Slashdot Mirror


Dusty Disc May Mean Other Earths

DoraLives writes "According to the BBC, astronomers say they have evidence for Earth-like planets orbiting a nearby star. The star in question is Vega, which is nice and close (as stars go), quite young (also as stars go), and one of the brightest stars in the sky. Apparently, 'Vega has a disc of dust circling it, and at least one large planet which could sweep debris aside allowing smaller worlds like Earth to exist.' Should be interesting to keep an eye on it as the years roll by as the disk rotates and our optical powers keep growing."

54 of 289 comments (clear)

  1. three-two-one---contact by ChrisTower · · Score: 5, Funny

    If it does have an Earth-type planet, it'll probably be inhabited by a bunch of beings that look like my late father... that's barely worth the trip out there, or an hour and half.

  2. Soon... by Kenja · · Score: 4, Funny
    Soon we'll be able to use amazingly powerful telescopes to stare out across the light years and see some one on Vegas planets staring back.

    Then the arms race starts.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Soon... by sisukapalli1 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      There is a high likelihood that one species is at a much more advanced stage than the other. Most likely, we'd be the more advanced ones (primarily due to the age of Sun and earth).

      It would be like the pilgrims landing in the US. Complete colonization one way or other. Not much scope for an arms race...

      S

    2. Re:Soon... by EvilNTUser · · Score: 4, Funny

      "i just hope no one gives them aids :)"

      Don't worry. James T. Kirk was a fictional character.

      --
      My Sig: SEGV
  3. Someone Get Jodie Foster on This ASAP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    She's the Expert on going to Vega....

  4. So... by Stile+65 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vegans really ARE aliens from another solar system!

    I'm off to eat some meat.

    --
    I claim first use of "Error No. 0B" - or "No. 0B error." It'll be the new ID 10T!
  5. Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by garyrich · · Score: 3, Funny

    not all that earthlike

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    1. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by garyrich · · Score: 2, Informative

      Eh? offtopic? the mods probably don't remember that Dune was a satellite of Vega...

      --
      -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
    2. Re:Dune... Arrakis... Desert Planet by rifter · · Score: 4, Funny

      "the mods probably don't remember that Dune was a satellite of Vega"

      Slashdot Rule 1: Don't assume that the mods remember anything

      No, Rule number one is we don't talk about moderation club outside of moderation club

  6. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by crymeph0 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Vega is only 25 light years away, so they'd be looking at the 70's. Of course, once they hear Disco, they'll probably decide nothing of value could have ever come from our system.

    --
    It should be illegal to say that freedom of speech should be limited.
  7. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by macshune · · Score: 2, Funny

    "i hate the fact that we cannot see the planets right now and can only see its past. for all we know they are looking back at us on earth back in 5000bc going nope no life."

    no, actually, they'd be looking at us in 1978 and saying "dude, check out the shitty clothes."

  8. woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Vega is where the message was relayed to earth from in Contact, perhaps rather than just relayed, it will actually be FROM Vega :-)

    --



    I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    1. Re:woah...Carl Sagan was right!!!! by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you remember the book, it pointed out that Vega was a giant star, with a lifetime of only a few million years. If the Vegans are going to avoid getting supernova'ed to death, they'll have to evolve like hell.

      Hear me, Vega? The clock is ticking.

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  9. Another thing to consider: by Sheetrock · · Score: 4, Insightful
    The more Earth-type planets we find in our tiny observable radius of the Universe, the greater the statistical probability that others exist where we can't see them.

    The likelihood of other meaningful life in the Universe just got better. And I for one welcome the possibility.

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:Another thing to consider: by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The likelihood of other meaningful life in the Universe just got better. And I for one welcome the possibility.

      I, for one, welcome our new Drake Equation overlords.

    2. Re:Another thing to consider: by rking · · Score: 4, Funny

      Beings with advanced technology could obtain all the resources we have on earth without resorting to warfare, so why would they bother us?

      Well, if they've been around longer than us and are more technologically advanced than us... odds are we're going to be infringing on some of their IP. Just ask Jack Valenti whether that's worth going to war over.

    3. Re:Another thing to consider: by Saeger · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Life is probably very common, but, IMO, most technologically advanced civilizations don't make it past The Great Filter.

      Those that *do* make it past that mass extinction filter (nuclear? bio? nano?), to Singularity, are probably so far advanced as to be unrecognizable and uninterested in us primitive biological ants.

      It's a pity humans still have all their eggs in one basket; until we've got self-sustaining offworld populations, we're a ticking time bomb.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    4. Re:Another thing to consider: by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Your point of looking for fish seems more analagous to looking for humans. Sure if you're looking for humans then you are best to look for earth like planets, since we know that's the environment humans live in - if you look for fish, look in the ocean, if you look for humans look on an earth like planet.

      But the search for ET life is just that, a search for life, not humans - we cannot say that life can only be found on earth like planets, we can't even say that in our solar system life can only be found on earth, it's entirely possible that there is life on other celestial bodies in our neighbourhood.

      Even if we take the search for intelligent ET life, it's still a search for an unknown life in an unknown environment, so the fixation on earth-like planets is silly.

      Far to often I think we assume that ET life must be like earth life, IMHO it's fairly unlikely, considering the (as far as is known) small percentage of planets that are earth like.

      Same as if we were looking for "any" life on earth, where do you look, well, everywhere you don't limit yourself to anything in particular because life can't exist there - it can, life can exist (almost) anywhere on earth, so why not anywhere in the universe?

      There is one advantage in looking for earth like planets, they could become useful to our distant descendants in the future, probably as a destination for a many-generational ship.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  10. Not the first, by ActionPlant · · Score: 3, Interesting

    But this certainly seems to be the most promising.

    I'm still all about developing a means of getting us out there to explore these places.

    Plus, it would certainly be nice to finally find a backup for our planet. You can't tell me there aren't at least a few people out there who have been rather alarmed at all of our recent unexpected solar activity.

    Damon,

    --
    http://actionPlant.com
  11. Contact by Necro+Spork · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Will everyone else now belive me that Carl Sagan may know more than he is letting on?

    --
    120 chars of filth!
  12. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Except, Vega isn't 7000 light years away. It's only 25 light years away. They're seeing the seventies. This is an even more frightening thought.

  13. Terrestrial Planet Finder Links by js7a · · Score: 5, Informative
    Until we get good stellar-occluding interferometers and coronagraphs, we can't be sure. Once we get those in place, it becomes possible to determine the atmospheric composition (i.e., O2, H2O, N2, etc.)

    Here are Terrestrial Planet Finder links at:

  14. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I kind of doubt anyone there is looking at us right now. From the (somewhat fuzzy) description in the article, it sounds like what we're observing is a disc of dust surrounding Vega with proto-planets forming within it. It was probably several hundred million years after the Solar System passed through that phase before life even got started on Earth. According to currently accepted models of planetary formation, those proto-planets would be pretty hellish places right now; their surfaces will be blazing hot and suffering constant bombardment by other, slightly smaller bodies. Being anywhere on the surface of one would be like being at Ground Zero of a massive nuclear strike.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  15. If astronomy was any other field of science... by bigHairyDog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... they'd be laughed off the stage.

    Seriously, there's a chance that a big planet might have cleared enough space so as to not preclude the existence of a planet the same size as ours

    CALL THE PRESIDENT! THE ALIENS ARE COMING!!

    --

    foo mane padme hum

  16. Ok, ok people, no Aliens... by JamesP · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Apparently everybody is thinking of earth-like planets and stuff. Sorry, but NO.

    1 - Vega is 25 light-years away. That's around the corner and "today" in astronomical terms

    2 - Carl Sagan picked Vega not because of planets, but because there were none, just a bunch of dust... There was a RELAY there, not aliens...

    3 - The news actually said about process that could happen; a balance between a dusty ring and an outer planet...

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  17. Contact Smontact! I have my space suit, will trave by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Funny

    I am SO depressed that all the /. crowd can come up with are lame Contact references.

    YOU CALL YOURSELVES GEEKS! DROP AND GIVE ME TWENTY!

    Vega, as ALL REAL GEEKS know, was the home of Mother Thing of Robert Heinlein's "Have Space Suit, Will Travel".

    And if they are watching Earth circa 1978, we'd better be damn thankful they don't rotate us 90 degrees just on general principles!

  18. Re:Life imitates art by DeadVulcan · · Score: 2, Informative

    Vega was the source of the extraterrestrial signal in Carl Sagan's "Cosmos."

    You mean "Contact," surely. And unfortunately, although it was the source of the signal, the system itself contained no life. So I don't think we can draw any parallels here.

    --
    Accountability on the heads of the powerful.
    Power in the hands of the accountable.
  19. Re:Maybe Schmaybe One Billion, Blah by Zone-MR · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There is no scientific theory that disproves it, so why not?

    What makes you believe that you/we are the most intelligent and important civillisation in the universe? The universe is pretty big, and that's a very arrogant assumption to make.

  20. Vega by Malicious · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now all we need is Jodie Foster to point all of her radio telescopes toward it, and we'll be having corporate sponsored alien space travel devices in no time.

    --
    01101001001000000110000101101101001000000110001001 10000101110100011011010110000101101110
  21. Vega is too big and to young by G4from128k · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article suggests that Vega is only 350 million years old. Moreover, at about 3 times the mass of the Sun, the lifespan of Vega will only be about 1 billion years. Given that it took about 3.5 billion years for life to get going, it seems unlikely that planets around Vega have (or ever could have) interesting lifeforms, even if an Earth-like planet is present.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
    1. Re:Vega is too big and to young by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I thought that life started 3.5 billion years before now, not that it took 3.5 billion to instantiate. Am I wrong? (actually, I think it's 3.8 billion)

    2. Re:Vega is too big and to young by Birger+Johansson · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I assume you mean *multicellular* life, or possibly *intelligent* life. The Vega system should be just old enough for the first primitive life forms to have emerged
      -This could mean an opportunity to observe the very transition from a "pre-DNA world" (based om RNA or even more primitive genetic substrates) to a "DNA world" -this is itself probably even more interesting than watching the planet-forming process around Vega.

  22. Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet... by Birger+Johansson · · Score: 4, Interesting

    -Since the Vega system is very young, any terrestrial planets will probably not yet be in a "finished" state, but will still be busy accreting smaller planetesimals- for the Earth, this initial process might have taken 30 million years. Also, any such planets will not have finished differentiating into a core, a mantle and a crust.
    If you send a probe there, it will not be able to find a cool surface on any of the larger planetesimals (growing proto-planets).
    The Vega system is interesting because it provides a snapshot of the early phase of planet formation.
    If you want to make a "Star Trek" style tour of a system, landing on the planets and checking for the presence of life, you need to find a more "mature" system, where the planetary crusts have had time to cool off, and where most of the orbiting debris has alredy been swept up by planets.

    One other interesting point about the Vega system though: It is bound to have an amazing number of large, highly visible comets ! In mature systems, most comets have either been kicked out to the Oort cloud or crashed into a planet.

    Yours Birger Johansson Sweden

  23. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 3, Funny

    [...] their surfaces will be blazing hot and suffering constant bombardment by other, slightly smaller bodies.

    So...not unlike my ex-girlfriend, then.

  24. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Funny

    "i hate the fact that we cannot see the planets right now and can only see its past. for all we know they are looking back at us on earth back in 5000bc going nope no life."

    Nar aliens have tachyon telescopes. They can see us in real time. They're watching us sitting around Slashdot and going "nope, no life."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  25. Wow... by i_am_syco · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought I'd be the first one with a Contact joke. Seems I'm one of the last.

  26. Sloppy definition of "Earthlike." by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This article is a little misleading.

    By Earthlike I believe they mean terrestrial; a rocky world, as opposed to a gas giant.

    Other known terrestrial worlds include baked-out Mercury, greenhouse-wracked Venus, and dry, cold Mars. Most people would not consider these "Earthlike" in the Star Trek Class M sense of the word.

    That said: Even given the existence of terrestrial planets, Vega isn't a great place to go looking for a habitable, life-bearing world. It's a bright, hot star, which also means that it is a short-lived star. In a few hundred million years, when its potential planets begin to cool to the point where water would condense, Vega would be getting ready to wander off the main sequence and get way unpleasant to be near.

    Another strike against life developing on Vega worlds: a greater percentage of its energy output would be in "bluer" wavelengths, including UV. Once it got started, life might adapt to UV, but to get started in the first place it needs some stability. I can see a influx of UV ripping apart delicate chemical chains in Vega Prime's oceans, greatly reducing the chance that life would get a foothold.

    All this said, this is hopeful news, because the existence of one planet-forming debris field means there are probably others . . . some around more genial F and G and K class stars.

    Stefan

  27. Earth is a proper noun.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Earth is a proper noun, no amount of dust is going to result in other earth's. Maybe earth-like or m-class or whatever you want to call them, but other earth's doesn't make sense in the same way other solar systems doesn't make sense.

    1. Re:Earth is a proper noun.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      Sol is the proper name of our solar system, just as Alpha Centauri is the proper name for that particular solar system.


      No, Sol is the name of our sun. The system of our sun is the Solar System.

  28. Re:too bad we're looking in the past by isomeme · · Score: 4, Funny

    First, there was plenty of life in 5000 BC. In fact, there was plenty of life in 1000000000 BC.

    Second, Vega is only 25 lightyears away, meaning that the horrid bug-eyed Vegans are peering through their observoscopes and lusting after Farrah Fawcett.

    --
    When all you have is a hammer, everything looks like a skull.
  29. Nothing like watching planets form by strictnein · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Should be interesting to keep an eye on it as the years roll by

    Yes, because the 1st billion years (or so, give or take a couple hundred million) of Earth's existance were oh so exciting. And don't even get me started about the 2nd billion! Wow!
    And the third billion... oh, my, god!

    As the years roll by? What is that supposed to mean? That maybe, we might be lucky enough to see a planet form over the next 100 million generations or so? Wooppee!

    I'll be excited when someone turns that slideshow into an animated GIF, ok?

  30. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Zeinfeld · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Vega is only 25 light years away, so they'd be looking at the 70's. Of course, once they hear Disco, they'll probably decide nothing of value could have ever come from our system.

    They would probably be more interested in the political situation. They would be watching the throes of the Nixon impeachment crisis in the West, China would still be in the middle of the cultural revolution, Vietnam would have ended but only just. The USSR would be in mid collapse. Latin America is run by cliques of corrupt generals who murder tens of thousands (Pinochet) or hundreds of thousands (Argentina).

    There has just been a war in the middle east. The Iranians are about to kick out the Shah (a brutal thug on a par with Saddam Hussein) and the Ayatolah would appear soon after to pervert the democratic revolution the same way Lenin appeared on the scene in Russia after the Tzar was deposed.

    Things don't get any better for quite a while and they get worse before they get better. The nuclear arms race accelerates, the US and the USSR are engaged in a series of proxy wars that appear likely to turn nuclear. If you look at the situation from the outside even the events of 1989 might be considered evidence of further instability rather than a good sign.

    On the whole I don't think that they are going to be avoiding talking to us just because of the disco music...

    I think we should get our act together globally before we start to try to join extra-terrestrial clubs. If there is anyone out there worth talking to they already know about us.

    --
    Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
    Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  31. Can this improve SETI's guessitude? by plainvanilla · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There's got to to be lots more where this came from. This particular sample was a lucky find, being a mere 25 light-years away. Could this lead to predicting similar (or better) environments beyond such easy eyeshot?

  32. Re:Probably not "finished" terrestrial planets yet by mindriot · · Score: 3, Funny
    If you send a probe there, it will not be able to find a cool surface on any of the larger planetesimals (growing proto-planets).

    Hm, given that Vega is 2.3935E14 km away and that Voyager I is travelling at 62500 km/h, a probe sent there will be travelling for about 437169 years. So maybe, by the time it gets there the planet will be ready :-)

  33. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Basehart · · Score: 2, Funny

    They would be watching the throes of the Nixon impeachment crisis in the West....

    No they wouldn't, they'd be looking at Jane Fondas tits!

  34. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2, Informative

    As opposed to the garden-variety, non-massive nuclear strike?

    Well, yeah, actually. Like what would have happened to Washington and Moscow if the Cold War had gone hot, as opposed to what happened to Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Not just one big boom, but a whole lot of them, one after another, until absolutely nothing is left.

    --
    The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
  35. Get yer terminology right by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Don't they mean a 'Class M' planet?

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
  36. who knows by ShadowRage · · Score: 2, Funny

    with these new planets forming, one day (assuming we're still alive and havent killed each other off like morons) we'll be receiving radio signals asking if they're alone or not in the universe.. :P

  37. No One's Found Earth-Like Planets at Vega...Yet by reallocate · · Score: 3, Informative

    This is an all-too-common example of sloppy BBC reporting. Evidence of Earth-like planets at Vega has not been found. What's been found is a dust disk that conforms to theories that very large planets ormed early in a system's development will migrate to larger orbits, dragging a lot of debris that would otherwise crash on small planets and inhibit life there. (Still a lot of rocks left over to crash and burn, though. Take a look at all those craters on the Moon. Earth would look the same, if not for erosion.)

    Good news, though, but not as good as imaging a small planet and getting positive results for water, oxygen and methane.

    --
    -- Slashdot: When Public Access TV Says "No"
  38. Re:too bad we're looking in the past by Smidge204 · · Score: 4, Funny

    the horrid bug-eyed Vegans ...and that's why meat and dairy are important parts of a well balanced diet.
    =Smidge=

  39. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by naasking · · Score: 2, Funny

    So...not unlike my ex-girlfriend, then.

    You sir, truly live up to your name. :-)

  40. Re:to bad we're looking in the past by slashnull · · Score: 2, Funny

    That's a good thing, because I don't want to have to remember any new kings. (ref., Futurama)

  41. you may be wrong on several accounts by guybarr · · Score: 2, Insightful


    I think the real threat to our planet is ourselves, not our sun.

    I think you ment biosphere, not planet ...

    Thus, I hope we do not find a backup planet. I hope this is it.
    If we foul our planet to the point it is unlivable, we deserve our fate.


    First, IMHO this is utterly wrong factually: once a society colonizes
    space, all it'll need is energy and materials. I suggest that actually
    there may be few solar systems which are completely uninhabitable.

    Second, from the pragmatic POV, this sounds to me like morality gone
    completely insane: are you truly sugesting that you'd willfully risk
    total genocide for humanity (and its surrounding biological system, BTW)
    just because you think we "deserve it" ?

    That's the largest-scale suicidal philosophy I have ever seen.

    Not, of course, that I am in any position to affect change on this issue. Either a habitable planet is in range or not. Either we find it, or not.

    Wrong. In fact, for a single individual, a researcher may be in one
    of the best positions to affect humanity's future course.

    Certainly we should try.

    To this I agree ;-)

    I just hope it is not too easy to leave Earth for the rich and powerful.

    Why not ? if it'll easy for them in several decades, it'll probably
    be easy for others later.

    And anyway, don't worry. Space travel is going to be risky buisness
    for a long time. If a rich and powerful person is willing to take on
    personal risks to explore a new fronteer, he/she'll probably be
    exactly the kind of person needed up there.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  42. Re:What do you call someone from Vega? by otis+wildflower · · Score: 2, Funny

    Vegans (pronounced 'vee-gan') don't eat meat.

    Vegans (pronounced 'vay-gan') love nothing more than the mouthwatering taste of human flesh.