Slashdot Mirror


SETI@Home Expanding Goals With Sun's Help

GabeK writes "The Register is reporting that the SETI@home project is going to be expanding the scope of their project with the help of Sun. Sun is donating a fleet of servers to the SETI@home project for use in its new BOINC (Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing) project. This project will use Sun's new JXTA peer-to-peer protocol for distributed computing, and will add other functions to the project other than looking for little green men. Users will now be able to dedicate slices of their idle time to projects other than SETI, like cancer research and climate mapping." We previously mentioned early word of BOINC a couple of months back.

133 comments

  1. BOINK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    is BOINC really the best acronym they could come up with?

    1. Re:BOINK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      You're absolutely right. When you rearrange the letters in "Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing", you get "grep for weekly beefcake pron units trout, court in morn". Much better, don't you think?

    2. Re:BOINK? by illtud · · Score: 2, Informative

      Boink is an old usenet term for a Real World get together, a meat, a meatspace meeting:

      http://groups.google.com/groups?hl=en&lr=&ie=UTF -8 &oe=utf-8&safe=off&q=boink&sa=N&tab=wg

      Can't for the life of me remember where the term came from, but I wonder if that was in their minds.
      (yes, I know it's boinc).

    3. Re:BOINK? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Can't for the life of me remember where the term came from, but I wonder if that was in their minds

      Wishful thinking?

    4. Re:BOINK? by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "is BOINC really the best acronym they could come up with?"

      I hope the screensaver program opens with the noise made by the power droids of the original *Star Wars* movie (Episode IV - A New Hope)...the power droids would walk around and say "bonk!"

      http://www.starwars.com/databank/droid/powerdroi d/ index.html

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  2. Upgrade time? by dan+dan+the+dna+man · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still can't see any information on their website as to when they will upgrade to BOINC.. Which is a shame.. I'm a top 5000 user and I want to switch ASAP :)

    --
    I don't read your sig, why do you read mine?
    1. Re:Upgrade time? by MoonFog · · Score: 4, Informative

      From this page:
      Status
      BOINC is under development. The source code and bug-tracking database are available. We are currently conducting a beta test of BOINC using the SETI@home and Astropulse applications. The public release will be announced on the SETI@home web site. Several other distributed computing projects are evaluating BOINC.


      Guess it will be some time yet.

  3. Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    Java? Really? I love Java and Sun, but Java isn't the fastest thing in the world. For something that uses advanced algorithms that are usually optimized in Assembly, is Java really a good choice?

    Fortress of Insanity

    1. Re:Hmmm.... by NeoBeans · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Java has one key advantage over assembler: it runs everywhere. Also, depending on the JVM in use, performance may not be bad at all... I'm sure that if optimizing assembler code was worth the effort to code it, the developers could write the Win32 flavor in assembler, and provide a Java version for those who run on other platforms.

    2. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thing is SETI and other distributed computing projects have been doing just that already. For example, SETI has C/C++ clients for Windows, Linux, BSD, Solaris, Mac OS X, you name it. Each has optimized assmebly cores.

    3. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      As an aside:

      "For its part, Sun is donating some of its midrange Solaris servers and some workstations. In addition, the SETI@home crew is dabbling with Sun's JXTA peer-to-peer protocols for future versions of BOINC."

      Who ever said it was going to be in java should kick themselves in the ass. Not pointed at the OP of this thread, but at the OP of the article.

    4. Re:Hmmm.... by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Java has one key advantage over assembler: it runs everywhere.

      Should they open their client's specs, they'd get a lot of coders who'd port it to any platform.

      Using Java because it's open is a bad idea, especially when there's no patent involved.

      --
      Trolling using another account since 2005.
    5. Re:Hmmm.... by ReallyQuietGuy · · Score: 1

      Should they open their client's specs

      IIRC, the reason they dont want to open their client code is because that opens the way to cheating. apparently a lot of assholes out there willing to screw up the scientific data in order to falsely claim improved crunch work-hours.

      imagine if a genuine alien signal was not found because the bastards who were handed those work units were running "fake" clients that returned false "nothing found" data?

    6. Re:Hmmm.... by scheidercheck · · Score: 1

      Why yes. Yes, it is.

  4. Hmm... by iamdrscience · · Score: 5, Funny

    Expanding the scope of SETI@Home, eh? So like SETI@Work, SETI@Car, SETI@Vacation, SETI@LunchBreak and such? Sounds good!

    1. Re:Hmm... by Epistax · · Score: 1

      SETI@Surgery

      By the aid of world computers, Dr. Nick can figure out whether to cut the blue or purple vein.

    2. Re:Hmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      has somebody ever Trademarked the @ symbol for such use?

      @Stake surely has..

  5. I doubt they'd find anything by ObviousGuy · · Score: 0, Interesting

    The whole premise behind SETI is that there are intelligent beings 'out there' in the universe that are broadcasting their signals into space. Even if there were beings doing just that, they would be hundreds if not thousands if not millions or billions of light years away from us making any sort of coherent response to a signal meaningless.

    If there were beings out there who had the capacity for interstellar travel (and that's the only kind that would matter because anything less than that would make communication impossible) they would have already found this noisy planet and if not made contact at least monitored us from a safe distance.

    So either way SETI is unlikely to find anything meaningful. I'm with the Christians on this one. The search for extra-terrestrial life is only a substitute for the search for meaning within one's self and with one's God.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by lennart78 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Even if there were beings doing just that, they would be hundreds if not thousands if not millions or billions of light years away from us making any sort of coherent response to a signal meaningless.

      The S in SETI stands for search, not for Speak.
      The finding of a signal with non-natural origins, such as broadcasts would be on of the major scientific breakthroughs of the century. Communicating with any -if existant- "aliens" is an other story altogether.

      Besides that - How many people play along in lotteries even their chances of winning are slim to none? People have a tendency to romatisize things, give 'em a break...

    2. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by danidude · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "The whole premise behind SETI is that there are intelligent beings 'out there' in the universe that are broadcasting their signals into space." I disagree. I think the whole promise behind SETI is that it MAY BE intelligent beings out there in the universe. How we can find then? SETI may not find then if they are, but I think that actively searching, even with very little chance of actually finding then, is a lot better than doing nothing at all to try to find the answer to that very important question: Are we alone? And at the moment SETI@HOME is the best way that I can use to give (yes, veeery smal) contribution to try to find the answer.

      --
      - no sig.
    3. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by retards · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So either way SETI is unlikely to find anything meaningful. I'm with the Christians on this one. The search for extra-terrestrial life is only a substitute for the search for meaning within one's self and with one's God.

      Maybe the search for meaning within one's self and with one's God (wow, not only do you assume everyone has a god, but you mean THE god with a capital G) is just a nice bush to hide your head in instead of facing up to mortality and a universe without clear meaning.

      Basically you are saying we should go to church and pray to some deathcult-deity instead of listening for radio waves from outer space. Somebody did a nice mind-job on you....

    4. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by nacturation · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The whole premise behind SETI is that there are intelligent beings 'out there' in the universe that are broadcasting their signals into space. Even if there were beings doing just that, they would be hundreds if not thousands if not millions or billions of light years away from us making any sort of coherent response to a signal meaningless.

      Some remote civilization might be broadcasting a sort of Open Source encyclopedia which gives a leg up to emerging space civilizations. Very very far-fetched, but what does that God of yours say? Seek and ye shall find?

      --
      Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
    5. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by GuidoJ · · Score: 1

      The goal of current SETI projects is not to communicate in the sense that you suggest, but to find out if there's any life out there capable of such communication in the first place. Finding a signal, just proves that there exists intelligent life besides us. So even if such a signal is coming from a system billions of light years away, the finding of it would be extremely meaningful.

      If you want to donate your spare cycles only to a project with a high probability of actually finding something, you should go cracking keys with DNet.

    6. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by DigitumDei · · Score: 5, Interesting

      SETI may be called the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence, but the data gained from it is used for various other scientific studies involving evaporating black holes and other radio wave emitting phenomena. Christian groups may call SETI useless, but then of course they are scared of its results and the effect it would have on their beliefs. And sure, the chance of finding any intelligent out there via SETI is incredibly slim. On the other hand, decoding a signal from outer space, even if we never translate it, will give us a very good idea of what direction to head when we do eventually get to exploring the universe (or more likely where our militaries decide to start pointing their guns, figuratively speaking).

    7. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by ThomasXSteel · · Score: 5, Interesting
      +1 Insightful WTF?

      The whole premise behind SETI is that there are intelligent beings 'out there' in the universe that are broadcasting their signals into space. Even if there were beings doing just that, they would be hundreds if not thousands if not millions or billions of light years away from us making any sort of coherent response to a signal meaningless.

      Communication does not have to be two way to get anything meaningful from it. Simply eavesdropping on the signals produced by an alien civilization could produce enormous benefits to mankind including but not limited to advances in the physical sciences, mathematics, and engineering.

      If there were beings out there who had the capacity for interstellar travel (and that's the only kind that would matter because anything less than that would make communication impossible) they would have already found this noisy planet and if not made contact at least monitored us from a safe distance.

      This is so flawed I don't even know where to start. First, interstellar travel is not a prerequisite for interstellar communication. All you need to communicate between stars is a sufficiently powerful EM wave, well within the capabilities of our current technology. Why would you have to be able to travel the stars to send an EM signal? "impossible" pfffffft whatever

      Second, just because beings have mastered interstellar travel doesn't mean they have found us. I guess you think "building very fast spaceship" == "finding earth". I don't think this is the case.

      So either way SETI is unlikely to find anything meaningful. I'm with the Christians on this one. The search for extra-terrestrial life is only a substitute for the search for meaning within one's self and with one's God.

      Seti is great testbed for distributed computing technology, worst case. Best case it is relatively low cost R&D that could pay massive technological dividends if anything is ever found. Leave god to the preachers, this is science.

    8. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Decaff · · Score: 1

      Second, just because beings have mastered interstellar travel doesn't mean they have found us.

      Yes it does, eventually. Any culture that travels in space, even at sublight speed, and builds colonies and expands exponentially and could have explored the galaxy in its entirety in a few tens of millions of years at most, according to most models of growth. The Earth is thousands of millions of years old.

    9. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Big+Nothing · · Score: 0

      This is one of the time I whish I could moderate a post "-1 Wrong" or "-1 Dumbass".

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    10. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Neop2Lemus · · Score: 2, Insightful
      I'm a Christian, yet I am interested in SETI. Yet, how can I be interested in SETI when I already have God and meaning in my life?

      You, Sir, are ignorant and obviously haven't talked to many Christians. Most of us are as excited about the possibility of alien life as you are.

      And I really like the idea of the Open-Source encyclopedia being broadcast for beginning or non-interstellar races (as posted below).

      --
      Needle Nardle Noo
    11. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by stwrtpj · · Score: 2, Insightful
      So either way SETI is unlikely to find anything meaningful. I'm with the Christians on this one. The search for extra-terrestrial life is only a substitute for the search for meaning within one's self and with one's God.

      Some people consider the search for extraterrestrial life to be an integral part of the search for meaning within one's self and with one's deity.

      --
      Karma: Frotzed (mostly due to the Frobozz Magic Karma Company)
    12. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Insightful

      they would have already found this noisy planet and if not made contact at least monitored us from a safe distance

      But space is big and time is, well, long. We have been pouring significant amounts of artificial EM into the universe for under a century. We have been actually listening in any sort of organized way for under half a century. The universe could be teeming with life - just not life that happens to be a) within 50 light-years of Earth b) in the EM-broadcasting phase of its development 50 years ago. If there was a culture at a Victorian-equivalent technological stage under a hundred light-years away, it would be completely invisible to us, and vice versa!

      Remember that lots of our broadcasting was entirely accidental; a culture that is running short of bandwidth and concerned about energy consumption won't want to tie up huge chunks of it with powerful broadcasts, but will want to use it much more efficiently with short-range signals, line-of-sight, fixed lines, etc etc. It's safe to make that assumption because it's grounded in the laws of physics.

      It's wise to keep an ear out, just in case.

    13. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by fruey · · Score: 3, Insightful
      If there were beings out there who had the capacity for interstellar travel (and that's the only kind that would matter because anything less than that would make communication impossible) they would have already found this noisy planet

      • Beings out there capable of interstellar travel may exist. Some of them may be too far from here to come and find this "noisy planet".
      • Communication does not rely on travel. Being able to send messages via signalling on good frequencies provides near light-speed communications. This may have long delays, but be nothing like the time it would take to travel interstellar distances, save wormholes and other things which break current known physical laws. Your concept of impossible is too restricted. Indeed, how would messages from the travellers get back to the earth in reasonable time if communication is impossible over such distances?
      • If other intelligent beings thought like you do, then they wouldn't have already found this planet in spite of the noise. Precisely for the reasons you think we shouldn't look.

      Thankfully, we don't all think like you, and sometimes allow far-reaching ideas with no definite goal to lead us to scientific discovery. If nothing else, SETI has already undeniably advanced distributed computing.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    14. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by michrech · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Basically you are saying we should go to church and pray to some deathcult-deity instead of listening for radio waves from outer space. Somebody did a nice mind-job on you....

      That's because they start them out when they are very young. Gives them plenty of time to screw them up so that we have to deal with them later in life.

      This guy reminds me of a .sig I saw on one of /.'s articles a while back..

      "Religion is a crutch for the weak minded"

      I knew, when I saw a thread about SETI, that it wouldn't take me long to see someone telling us how useless it is to search for the LGM's but that we should instead believe in whatever god they believe in.. Just amazing..

      =]

      --
      bork bork bork!
    15. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Ohreally_factor · · Score: 1

      Unless they traveled back in time in their time machines.

      --
      It's not offtopic, dumbass. It's orthogonal.
    16. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by El+Torico · · Score: 1

      Then again, decoding that signal just might give us a very good idea of what direction to run away from! Actually, I prefer a nice, empty universe that is all ours. We have enough conflicts with each other; we don't need more complications.

      --
      In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is usually crucified.
    17. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by dr_canak · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think the word is still out on whether or not SETI will find anything interesting. What I think is fundamentally important about SETI is that is has become a proof in concept for the power of distributed computing.

      SETI, to my knowledge, was the first large scale, public domain, distributed computing effort to do something interesting in the name of science. The fact that it's looking for alien communications worked great with the "geek" community, a large number of which happen to like computers as well. It became the genesis for all distributed computing projects to follow.

      Had the very first distributed computing project involve folding proteins, it would have never, ever attracted the same level of attention/effort that a search for alien communications did. However, because it has attracted this level of attention and effort, and because of its success as model for how distributed computing can work, we now see a whole slew of distributed computing projects coming up and companys developing distributed computing apps as a business model.

      Generally speaking, I think only good things are going to come of these efforts, and at a much faster pace than they might otherwise have.

      just my .02
      jeff

    18. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by michrech · · Score: 1

      Yes it does, eventually. Any culture that travels in space, even at sublight speed, and builds colonies and expands exponentially and could have explored the galaxy in its entirety in a few tens of millions of years at most, according to most models of growth. The Earth is thousands of millions of years old.



      But your assuming that they actually lasted a few tens of millions of years.

      --
      bork bork bork!
    19. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moo.

    20. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by DrewBeavis · · Score: 1

      I can't speak for all Christians, but the ones I know are pretty sure that if God created us, he has the power to create other life forms, too. Omnipotent means All-powerful, not just powerful in our galaxy.

    21. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Gee, sure is easy to scoff at each other from opposite sides of the fence. Ever going to realize that YOU are being just as closed-minded about the whole thing that the "religious nut" you poke fun at?

      Ever consider that you're both right? ...or wrong?

    22. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree with this post.

    23. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by jsebrech · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Note that there are about 70 sextillion stars in the universe. That's a 7 with 22 zeroes. Even if only one in a billion stars has a planet orbiting it with intelligent life on it, that still means there are 70000000000000000 such planets in the universe.

      Ofcourse, distances between galaxies are so large we can only reasonably search within our own galaxy, the milky way. The guesses here go from 3 billion stars to 100 billion stars. With the previously mentioned 1 intelligent species homeworld per billion stars this would result in 3 to 100 such homeworlds.

      The odds ofcourse of intelligent life evolving are not known, because we don't understand yet how life evolved to the finest detail. So most guesses have to be taken with a grain of salt. Still, the odds can be pretty slim and still result in intelligent life being pervasive in the galaxy.

      Also, you have to take into account the age of civilizations. If an intelligent civilization developed 1 billion years ago around alpha centauri, it would be long gone by now, so we wouldn't be able to pick up their communications. Why wouldn't the civilization keep existing? Simple, the older a civilization get the likelier it becomes it destroys itself in one way or another. And if somehow a civilization doesn't destroy itself, it would either turn inwards (not communicate with the rest of the universe) or turn outwards (colonise the rest of the universe). Since we haven't seen any alien colonists schedule up an interplanetary zoning meeting with Bush, it seems unlikely there are any colonising civilizations out there. Although, I did like the idea from Star Trek where they only made young civilizations aware of the existance of the federation once the civilization developed intersolar travel.

      Given the size of the universe, it's indeed pretty likely there is intelligent life out there. I fully expect we will find at least one intelligent extraterrestrial lifeform before our species disappears. What I'm curious about is how this is going to be retrofitted into religion, which very much assumes we are $DEITY's chosen ones.

    24. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by jsebrech · · Score: 1

      Whoops, got the 7 with a lot of 0's thing wrong, it should be 70000000000000. Still plenty.

    25. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're all nuts.

    26. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      SETI@Home is the most popular project, measured by number of participants, but it was actually the third large-scale, public domain, distributed computing project. A lot of its functionality and design is based on the second project, distributed.net, which in turn is based on some design ideas from the first project, GIMPS.

      SETI@Home has definitely done a lot to popularize distributed computing, and has influenced many later projects, including protein folding projects like Distributed Folding and Folding@Home.

      To see what other projects are out there, take a look at my site about distributed computing projects. And click on the links to past years (on my main index page) to see just how fast this field of science is growing.

      Kirk

      P.S. Somebody please /. my site so I don't have to keep plugging it in these SETI@home discussions :-)

    27. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is no such thing as god... god is just an idea created by ancient men to explain their world and later used by other men to subdue the masses to make them do things like empty their pockets of money, go to war, etc.

    28. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by LearnToSpell · · Score: 1

      The finding of a signal with non-natural origins, such as broadcasts would be on of the major scientific breakthroughs of the century.

      Right up there with eBay and the Segway? s/the century/all time/

      Every imaginable aspect of human existence would be instantly changed. Religion is the obvious first example.

    29. Re:I doubt they'd find anything by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm willing to bet advanced alien civilizations wouldn't be creationists.

  6. Well, see it from our side.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ..we're geeks, this is the only BOINC we're going to get.

    1. Re:Well, see it from our side.. by lullabud · · Score: 1

      But if you just glance at it you might mistake it for BIONIC, which would've been clever.

  7. here's a thought by Pompatus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Why don't we combine this new idea of distributed computing with a P2P network? It should be technically feasable, and then the eff people could run an ad campain such as, "The RIAA is against Kazaa. Kazaa cures cancer. Therefore, RIAA is for cancer!" similar to the campain comercial in Head of State.

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:here's a thought by SamSim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Why don't we combine this new idea of distributed computing with a P2P network?

      You mean share our music with the aliens?

    2. Re:here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      JXTA is a P2P network.

    3. Re:here's a thought by Geek_in_Marketing · · Score: 1

      Funny you should mention that.

      Direct Connect
      http://dcplusplus.sourceforge.net

      They have several hubs whose members share work units for SETI. Check out the UKS hub (uks.no-ip.com)for their figures!

      Apologies for not supplying a working hyperlink, I'm not very good with this HTML stuff yet.

      --

      "This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
    4. Re:here's a thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're not serious, are you?

      That's like saying "Pompatus is against gun control. Guns kill people. Therefore, Pompatus is for killing people!"

      Just because you are against something for one reason doesn't mean you are against it for another reason.

      I think a lot of people are against some of the outrageous stunts that PETA pulls off. But I also think a lot of those same people are FOR the humane treatment of animals.

      How about this one:
      "Pompatus is for Kazaa. Kazaa infringes copyrights on a massive scale. Therefore, Pompatus is for copyright infringement!"

      It's the old "tool" arguement. Kazaa is a tool. You can cure cancer with it, or you can infringe copyrights with it (OK, not everything being shared is infringing copyrights).

      A gun is a tool. You can shoot dangerous criminals with it, or you can shoot innocent civilians with it.

      I guess shooting someone is not comparable to infringing copyrights, though. Haha.

      Damn. I sound like an NRA lapdog! I don't own a gun, nor does any of my family. But I would consider buying one to protect myself from people like you.

  8. Re:Disappointing marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yes. Yes I agree. You for one should put some clock cycles towards fixing your goddamned grammar.

    Hint #1: Don't spray apostrophes everywhere. Pretend there's a worldwide shortage and use them sparingly.

  9. Scientific progress goes... by Epistax · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Boinc".


    (extremely obvious)

    1. Re:Scientific progress goes... by richteas · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If it is the Calvin and Hobbes quote you are referring to, this is where it is from: Scientific Progress goes "Boink?", first published 01/10/1990 :)

  10. Re:Disappointing marketing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    My father's cancer is gone thanks to a treatment that was just an EXPERIMENT several years ago.

    People are only fooling themselves if they think that by running these that they'll see prompt effects.

    Research needs experiments to validate/invalidate it. Successful research experiments can lead to experimental treatments, which can become standard treatments.

    So coming from someone who has family members who were cured by things that were at one point just "an experiment", I say learn what you're talking about, and until then shut up.

  11. Stuff to read... by BillGodfrey · · Score: 4, Informative
    I wrote this primer on building a distributed computing system a while ago. Looks like it needs updating.

    Bill, shamelessly plugging.

  12. Re:Disappointing marketing by Psiren · · Score: 1

    Indeed. He should probably look up the difference between their and they're too, seeing as he used neither correctly.

  13. Ambiguous subject by mirko · · Score: 1

    So they are now looking for help in order to find those farting solar E.T.s ???

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  14. Slashdot users worldwide now conflicted by Burb · · Score: 1, Insightful

    SETI ... Ug says SETI good
    Sun ... Ug says Sun baaad
    Oh no, Ug says make pain stop!

    --

    1. Re:Slashdot users worldwide now conflicted by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ug... Brian says Ug dumb.
      Is everything that Sun does evil to you guys? If they saved a kitty from a tree would you knock them for not letting anyone else help or something? jeeze.

    2. Re:Slashdot users worldwide now conflicted by Burb · · Score: 1

      Well that was kinda my point. There's quite a few people around here that hate Sun, IBM, SCO, Microsoft to an equally venomous degree. The kind of person that hears that Bill Gates breathes on a daily basis and instinctively starts holding their breath in defiance of his monopoly.

      --

  15. Bandwith? by neglige · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the past SETI@home had many network problems, with Berkeley throttling down the available bandwidth for SETI... Will BOINC adress this issue? There doesn't seem to be any information about this on the BOINC pages, and additional clients will probably increase the demand for bandwith further. I guess it's feasible to place the BOINC servers outside the Berkeley network infrastructure.

    --
    My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    1. Re:Bandwith? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      I sorta figured that a switch to JXTA would bring along greater decentralization. Any central server ought to have their load reduced, that way.

    2. Re:Bandwith? by neglige · · Score: 1

      Hmm... I think the results need to come from and go back to the "originator" (some BOINC server), which means that a P2P model would help to distribute the load: if you can't send the results now, put it on a peer, he'll take care of it later. Still, the data is gathered at a central point - or am I mistaken here?

      Scattering the servers across the P2P network is a possibility, of course, and it would reduce the bandwith requirements for each server, so that could very well be the solution... :)

      --
      My cats ate my karma. They also wrote this comment.
    3. Re:Bandwith? by nicnak · · Score: 4, Informative

      During one of the last times that Berkeley throttled their bandwith the SETI@home project moved to a different hosting location. They are now situated off campus and have their own pipe to the net. The Planetary Society has a good artical about the bandwith problems.

    4. Re:Bandwith? by spellicer · · Score: 1

      You do have the option of decentralizing some of the BOINC operations. The server side components are pretty small and flexible. Eventually some information on the workunits processed returns to the centralized database, but data distribution and assimilation can actually happen on seperate servers as long as the workunit and result records on the central database are eventually updated.

  16. JXTA has improved greatly by joelparker · · Score: 4, Interesting
    If you haven't seen JXTA,
    or looked at JXTA recently,
    it just got a *lot* better.

    Check out the main website
    and this review of JXTA 2 by DeveloperWorks

    Cheers, Joel

  17. BOINC is great by gxv · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Old S@H protocol was full of security flaws. Due to lack of verification of returned data it was possible to modify the workunits. And people did it, just to make them compute fast. In the fisrt 100 places of current Top 1000 list there is at least 10 cheaters. I've heard some time ago that approx 30% of workunits results returned to Berkeley was fake.
    BOINC prevents this. S@H will now able to verify iof returned result is real or cheated.

  18. DRM cracking by t_allardyce · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    How about various DRM and TCPA cracking projects? I'll donate cycles to anyone who wants to publically humiliate Bill Gates, Senitor Fritz (he still around?) or any of the other crack heads that fancy controlling what i do with my own computer in my own home.

    Maybe they can give me a spell check too?

    --
    This comment does not represent the views or opinions of the user.
    1. Re:DRM cracking by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      Now that's just silly. Legally, it's too dangerous for SETI to get involved with DRM cracking. Wait until that portion of the DMCA is invalidated.

      Large prime factorization would be cool, though.

    2. Re:DRM cracking by Short+Circuit · · Score: 1

      doh...That should be "Prime factorization of large numbers"

  19. The Sun by Cutriss · · Score: 3, Funny

    Am I the only one who read the title and thought that SETI was somehow using the Sun to pull in weaker transmissions, or maybe using it to threaten some rather anti-social aliens? :P

    Considering that SETI = Search for Extra-Terrestrial Intelligence, the context was rather amusing...

    --
    "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    1. Re:The Sun by Big+Nothing · · Score: 1

      Nope, I too thought of THE sun first.

      When i got to the line "Sun is donating a fleet of servers" it got REALLY confusing.

      --
      SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
    2. Re:The Sun by OverclockedMind · · Score: 0

      SETI@Home Expanding Goals With Sun's Help from the company-not-large-flaming-object dept. kind of explains it all, you know :)

      --
      if you can read this, good, because i sure cant
  20. ok time to spend some of that karma by Indy1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I know i am going to get modded flamebait here, but i dont care.

    What a typical fundamentalist christian statement you have there. "The search for extra-terrestrial life is only a substitute for the search for meaning within one's self and with one's God."

    Translation: Dont be searching for ET you sinners, cause if you do find proof of intelligent life out there, it shoots giant fucking holes in our dogma. Thats why the catholic church, ever an institution thats quick to condemn anything that crosses their ideology, burnt
    Giordano Bruno at the stake for even suggesting the possibility of intelligent life that was not on earth.

    As far as your assertions that ET would of already heard us and visited us if they existed, there are MANY possibilities that can include intelligent life not traveling here for any number of reasons. But that goes into the realm of speculation. Seti is about hard science, and the seti project is extremely cautious about making any sort of claim.

    --
    Lawyers, MBA's, RIAA? A jedi fears not these things!
    1. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by Decaff · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As far as your assertions that ET would of already heard us and visited us if they existed, there are MANY possibilities that can include intelligent life not traveling here for any number of reasons. But that goes into the realm of speculation. Seti is about hard science, and the seti project is extremely cautious about making any sort of claim.

      The problem of why ET would not have visited us is a serious one (the Fermi Paradox), and is a compelling argument for SETI being a waste of time. Lack of visits implies that either there are ETs out there and not one of them is even slightly interested in space flight (the entire galaxy could be colonised at sublight speeds within tens of millions of years), or that there are none there at all.

    2. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by JPelorat · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      No no, no worries - as long as it's a generalising, blanket hatred against Christianity or any other religion, you'll never catch a Flamebait here.

      --
      Hokey statistics and ancient misconceptions are no match for a good thought in your head, kid!
    3. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Dont be searching for ET you sinners, cause if you do find proof of intelligent life out there, it shoots giant fucking holes in our dogma. Thats why the catholic church, ever an institution thats quick to condemn anything that crosses their ideology, burnt Giordano Bruno [wsws.org] at the stake for even suggesting the possibility of intelligent life [setileague.org] that was not on earth."

      Get a grip. It's one thing to say something is pointless and that you are better off finding meaning in your own life. It is another thing entirely to persicute or belive people are heathens or something because of it. There really is nothing tangible that can come from SETI and therefore the argument is valid and should be addressed rather then deflecting it without slipery slope and strawmen arguments.

    4. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by liquidsin · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I hope you're joking. Your 'either-or' assertion is utter bullshit. Hell, there are earthlings interested in finding intelligent life, yet none of us has ever travelled beyond our own moon. What makes you so sure that there aren't millions of other life forms in the universe in the exact same predicament?

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    5. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by michrech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem of why ET would not have visited us is a serious one (the Fermi Paradox), and is a compelling argument for SETI being a waste of time. Lack of visits implies that either there are ETs out there and not one of them is even slightly interested in space flight (the entire galaxy could be colonised at sublight speeds within tens of millions of years), or that there are none there at all.

      So, then, there is no possibility that they came by, saw us, decided that either we weren't ready for a visit (which I believe personally - not that they came by already, but that we aren't ready), or that they came by and throught we weren't technologically ready for the visit, or? Why does it half to be that they simply aren't interested in space travel or aren't there at all, and that's it? Why can there not be any other possibilities?

      --
      bork bork bork!
    6. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by Decaff · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm not joking at all. Its not bullshit - take a look at any SETI site and you will see that my point (the Fermi Paradox) is taken deadly seriously. we earthlings haven't got beyond the moon because we have only been space travellers for under 50 years. Are you seriously suggesting that if there were millions of other life forms in the universe they would ALL be stay-at-homers, or ALL be the same age as us in terms of technology?

    7. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by Decaff · · Score: 1

      So, then, there is no possibility that they came by, saw us, decided that either we weren't ready for a visit (which I believe personally - not that they came by already, but that we aren't ready), or that they came by and throught we weren't technologically ready for the visit, or? Why does it half to be that they simply aren't interested in space travel or aren't there at all, and that's it? Why can there not be any other possibilities?

      So where are the probes? Where are the space stations? You have to assume that ALL of them simply aren't interested in space travel - that at no stage in the lifetimes of millions of civilisations that may each be tens or hundreds of millions of years old did anyone take an interest in migration or colonisation. This is a big assumption, but its one you have to make if you expect to find radio signals via SETI.

    8. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "The problem of why ET would not have visited us is a serious one (the Fermi Paradox), and is a compelling argument for SETI being a waste of time. Lack of visits implies that either there are ETs out there and not one of them is even slightly interested in space flight (the entire galaxy could be colonised at sublight speeds within tens of millions of years), or that there are none there at all."

      Wait a sec. Your comment about "lack of visits" should be clarified. It is quite conceivable that extra terrestrials have visited Earth without one being labeled as a "tin foil hat" brigade. Just because no aliens have landed in New York City near the U.N. and asked to be *taken to our leader* does not mean they haven't been here. It is not hard to believe that aliens would conduct themselves like our own Special Ops does; sneak in and sneak out with as little detection as possible. This is highly probable since a single alien ship landing on our planet would be outnumbered greatly by the amount of humans (5 billion?) and any one of us could be labeled as "hostile."

      From what I gather, you are from the school of thought that complains about not having any tangible evidence in your hand of a visitation to our planet. But let's use a *real world* example to show how foolish that is. There are numerous items that our Department of Defense builds each year that have no real paper trail due to being part of the "black projects" (and I'm not talking about flying UFOs at Area 51 but *actual* classified weapons). Just because you don't have access to those records does not mean that they don't exist.

      And as for the Fermi Paradox, that's nice to try to explain extra terrestrials with, but you are judging alleged advanced beings by our own scientific knowledge. If you rely upon that, in 100 years you might look as foolish as the people who claimed if a human drove a car faster than 35 mph they'd die, or even better, a Biblical passage where Joshua commands the sun to stand still...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    9. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "So where are the probes? Where are the space stations?"

      To qute Lord Vader, "all too easy." Ever heard of a *cloaking device*? Perhaps outer space is just as dangerous as here on Earth with various factions fighting one another. We encrypt data all the time on this planet and go to great lengths to make aircraft undetectable to our own devices, let alone the devices of beings not of our species.

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    10. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      I take that back on the term "cloaking device." Too Americanized with the *Star Trek* and *Star Wars* cannons. How about if I say "chamelion circuit" instead? (judging from your spelling of "civilisations" and "colonisation" you might be British so a *Doctor Who* reference would be in order...). :)

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    11. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by bonehead · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lack of visits is no problem at all. What basis is there to assume that a space faring race would choose Earth as a destination? There are a variety of reasons why they may not be interested in coming here. For example, if their reason for venturing into space was colonisation, don't you suppose they'd look for EMPTY planets?

      As for probes and space stations... You're joking, right? Only recently have we even been able to detect Earth sized planets around other stars, and we still can't observe them visually. How are we supposed to be detecting probes and space stations at equal distances?

    12. Re:ok time to spend some of that karma by Wiwi+Jumbo · · Score: 1

      I don't know... even if we could just get their television I think it would be interesting to watch their news...

      Think of it this way, if we watch a planet destroy themselves one alien newscast at a time, it might help us to keep us from destroying ours...

      ???

      --
      Wiwi
      "I trust in my abilities,
      but I want more then they offer"
  21. Ah... but this is the age old debate by Zegnar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That I've had with friends - why the hell are you using your computer to look for little green men (who, even if they contact us, are near enough to come to us, and do so, will probably make us into gourmet ready-meals for their home planet, or smething) when they could be running something like the UD Cancer Project

    This gives SETI more legitimacy IMO... as a fun project attatched to one with real value. Of course, I suppose Sun probably couldn't stomach donating to a commercial venture like UD, so I won't criticize them for choosing SETI.

    1. Re:Ah... but this is the age old debate by FooAtWFU · · Score: 1
      why the hell are you using your computer to look for little green men (who, even if they contact us, are near enough to come to us, and do so, will probably make us into gourmet ready-meals for their home planet, or smething)
      Because it makes a spiffy screensaver. It's pretty nifty to see every machine in the school's computer lab decked out in the SETI@Home screensaver.
      --
      The World Wide Web is dying. Soon, we shall have only the Internet.
    2. Re:Ah... but this is the age old debate by liquidsin · · Score: 1

      And why are you posting to slashdot when you could be out curing AIDS? What's that? You think you can do as you please with your own time and resources? Well then, fuck you! So can I!

      --
      do not read this line twice.
    3. Re:Ah... but this is the age old debate by DavesWorld334 · · Score: 1

      Many many many resources are devoted to cancer and other medical researches. People are eternally self centered, after all.

      Hardly any resources are devoted towards space exploration, even planet based exploration such as SETI.

      Not only is SETI dilluting its user base with these non-space-exploration projects, but some folks are apparently going to crow about it.

      A sad day for SETI indeed.

    4. Re:Ah... but this is the age old debate by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      "That I've had with friends - why the hell are you using your computer to look for little green men...when they could be running something like the UD Cancer Project."

      I've encountered the same thing, but unfortunately for UD (United Devices), they limited themselves by only centering on the WinTel platform. For the longest, their website referred to the x86 platform as "Intel." They wouldn't say "Intel-compatible" or even mention AMD. So sure, I could've went ahead and downloaded their client and tried it, but I didn't want to take the chance of submitting completed work units with errors due to my computers using AMD chips. (the same goes for overclocking with SETI@home).

      United Devices still does not support Mac OSX, and the last time I checked they didn't support Linux on x86. There are plenty of distributed computing platforms that are more universal so UD is doing this to their own selves.

      I'm hoping BOINC will be released with support for the G5 and the AMD64 chips...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
  22. Similar but different by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How about a "community" distributed computing project? A true P2P thing where anyone can upload a job and have it processed by folks, and in return provide computing power to others. No centralized server and formalized infrastructure, just a bunch of geeks crunching data for each other.

    --
    Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
  23. Re:Shame on sun by Zegnar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this a troll? Unfortunately capitalism means people can spend money how they like, though. However, what ya also have to notice is that the money does not stop in the hands of SETI - it is used to purchase equipment, materials, bandwidth, etc, and stimulates the economy. Also, sun can use this as a massive tax write-off, since they can overvalue their own equipment to sale price :) Since I doubt starving children would have much use for things that Sun makes... (mmm... the tastiest bit is the lead solder...)

  24. Huh? by Cujo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't understand your post at all. There is no "whole premise" as you describe it. Science has found no reason why sentient life on Earth should be unique. Rare, maybe (maybe not), but not unique. So, the hugely interesting and important question arises of just how rare it is. SETI is one of the best sets of investigations we can undertake now to try to answer that question. Astrobiology is the other area where we hope to make progress, and which could help us constrain some of the terms in the Drake Equation.

    If there were beings out there who had the capacity for interstellar travel (and that's the only kind that would matter because anything less than that would make communication impossible) they would have already found this noisy planet and if not made contact at least monitored us from a safe distance.
    So either way SETI is unlikely to find anything meaningful.

    Non-sequitur of the week, maybe month. communications != travel. Also, we've been using RF communications for about 100 years, so there's every reason to believe that only listeners in a small volume of space could know about us by those means. Also, if "they" were monitoring us from a safe distance, how would we know?

    --

    Helium balloons want to be free.

  25. SSDI ... by peter303 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Same acronymn as SETI, except replace ET with slashdot.

    Still looking ...

    1. Re:SSDI ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I Cnat FIND IT!@

      omg tehers no intellgenace hAER!

  26. i don't understand by circletimessquare · · Score: 1

    the sun is no help to the search for extraterrestials

    for one, anything in it's part of the sky is blocked or drowned out by the suns electromagenetic emissions

    additionally...

    oh wait, nevermind ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
  27. SETI by M|tzi · · Score: 1

    It's a hard enough job to find intelligent life on THIS planet. How much harder is it going to be to find it elsewhere in the universe??? :)

  28. How sexist, only little green men?! by hellfire · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm hoping with the upgrades they will start looking for sexy green women.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:How sexist, only little green men?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And if we find sexy green women they better look out for Capt James T Kirk!

  29. Re:Disappointing marketing by Inda · · Score: 1

    He got more right than wrong. Surely he should get some credit for that..?

    --
    This post contains benzene, nitrosamines, formaldehyde and hydrogen cyanide.
  30. What else... by gumbysworld · · Score: 0

    What else is SUN gonna do with all of them AMD servers? Sell Em???

  31. You be silly: Pointing out stupidity isn't hatred by revscat · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Your attempt at persecution sympathy is noted, but ultimately fails. I occasionally browse at -1, and I've seen tons of anti-religious posts modded down, sometimes justly, sometimes not. The post you are replying to was no more full of hate than any other energetic critique of a dogma.

    Hate: "All Christians should die."
    Not: "Christians perform symbolic ritualistic cannibalism. That's freaking weird, man."

    I know Christians in America love to tell each other that they are a persecuted minority, but it doesn't hold water under scurtiny.

  32. Seti@home causes global warming by daminotaur · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There's an idea that since your computer isn't doing anything anyway, the seti screen saver is zero cost. Not so. My CPU runs 5 degrees Centigrade hotter when running seti@home than if a basic screensaver is running. Thus there is even more strain on the hardware. Currently, about 1100 years of CPU time per day are devoted to seti@home. Not sure what the increased power usage is, but for each watt that's roughly 10 megawatt-hours per day of energy going up in smoke (or CO2). Since the idea of finding an alien signal by these means is clearly a non-starter after so many years, it's about time more justifiable projects were found.

    1. Re:Seti@home causes global warming by Ayaress · · Score: 1

      Yes, but you see, my computer is powered by a dynamo attached to the rear hub of a bicycle. The only real cost to me is the extra caffine and doghnuts I need to keep peddling.

    2. Re:Seti@home causes global warming by The+Lynxpro · · Score: 1

      My CPU runs 5 degrees Centigrade hotter when running seti@home than if a basic screensaver is running.

      Are you really complaining on Slashdot about increased wear and tear on your computer purchases? Are you really going to use your same hardware for more than 5 years? Because if not, then all you are doing is increasing your computer's efficiency by making it do work even when you yourself have nothing to give your own computer to do. You'd be better to complain about higher utility bill costs instead...

      --
      "Right now, somewhere in this world, Scott Baio is plowing a woman he doesn't love," - Peter Griffin, *Family Guy*
    3. Re:Seti@home causes global warming by daminotaur · · Score: 1

      Aha, and you exhale what?

  33. Feeding the trolls! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Awsome troll. I read your other work... you're on a roll.

  34. SETI = search for little green men? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Here is a bit of nitpicking.

    The SETI Project is much, much larger in scope than just the SETI@home component. There is an incredible amount of research, all hard-science, going on under the umbrella of SETI that is not SETI@home related. SETI@home is certainly one of the most promient, publicy accessible parts, so the generaliztion is understandable, but not for this "academic" crowd.

    Swing on by their site and educate yourself: www.seti.org

  35. Re:You be silly: Pointing out stupidity isn't hatr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know Christians in America love to tell each other that they are a persecuted minority, but it doesn't hold water under scurtiny.


    Now you're generalizing.

    As a Christian, I expect to be persecuted. I don't claim that I am. So you see, I just disproved your statement.

  36. Re:Shame on sun by Ayaress · · Score: 0, Troll

    Waste of money? An entire project that, in order to survive, has to litterally get people to come and give them free access to their spare clock cycles? I suppose you're either dumb, ill-informed, or just want to piss people off, but you should read up on an issue before developing an opinion. Any issue. For example, SpaceGuard, which looks for earth-crossing asteroids, has the funding and staff roughly equivalent to a small urban McDonalds franchise. SpaceGuard has SETI pwned six ways from sunday for all that, too. SETI is more like a small rural McDonalds franchise that only opens on Friday and Sunday because that's when all the city folk are driving up to their cabins at the lake, but the other five days, nobody ever uses that dirt road. The only way SETI gets anything done is by leeching clock cylcles off of other people. What the fuck can Sun do to stop hunger, poverty, etc? And with Microsoft, Apple, and everybody else giving computers to schools it's really the school's fault if they don't have computers. You can get a million dollar lab of them for free if you whine to the right people.

  37. Re:Shame on sun by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And don't forget Sun is one of those companies that is donating products (mainly StarOffice and JDS) to thousands of schools and colleges all over the world

  38. Who gets access to the data developed by BOINC? by sean.peters · · Score: 1

    If, for example, I dedicate some fraction of my spare cycles to drug research, am I essentially giving this information to a big pharmaceutical company, which will then patent it? Or will the data be "open-sourced" somehow?

    I won't be donating any of my spare CPU time until I can get an answer...

    Sean

    1. Re:Who gets access to the data developed by BOINC? by carlgt1 · · Score: 1

      It depends on the applications you are interested in running within BOINC what their policy is and whether you choose to use them within BOINC. It isn't a "BOINC-level" global decision what is done with the data. I happen to work on climateprediction.net and we will be "BOINC'ing." Our data will be available to the public on many levels to interested parties, e.g. via summaries of the data & results for the general public in the usual literature, or directly for researchers, gov't agencies etc, probably via grid tools (we're building interfaces to the NERC Data Grid, etc).