Slashdot Mirror


iTunes 4.2 and QuickTime 6.5

usr122122121 writes "iTunes 4.2 and QuickTime 6.5 were released today, available by Apple's Site and Software Update (respectively)."

20 of 467 comments (clear)

  1. Quicktime 6.5 by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Hm - hopefully this will fix the problem of "No One Lives Forever 2" not being able to function in Quicktime 6.4. Otherwise, I'm going to install Jaguar to my iPod and boot off that when I want some "Cate Archer" sneaking action.

  2. just wondering by Dreadlord · · Score: 3, Interesting

    any plans of a Linux version of iTunes? Since Mac OS X kernel is BSD, I guess porting to Linux wouldn't be that hard.

    --
    The IT section color scheme sucks.
    1. Re:just wondering by aristotle-dude · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You hit the nail on the head. If linux is ever to succeed on the desktop, the distros will have to agree upon one common set of libraries and a common default window manager. I personally don't see that happening any time soon so Windows will continue to rule and the only viable alternative for the desktop with commercial apps is OS X. Perhaps OS X will achieve a 10-15% market share as people get tired of waiting for longhorn over the next few years.

      Commercial Apps must be able to run in binary form on all major distros if linux is to gain any significant marketshare on the desktop.

      --
      Jesus was a compassionate social conservative who called individuals to sin no more.
    2. Re:just wondering by molarmass192 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ummmm, Apple does *not* have an 8% market share. They may have back in 1997 but they now have 2.9% COE (client operating environment) market share to Linux's 2.8% as per IDC. Linux is expected to overtake Apple for the number 2 spot on the desktop early in 2004. To me that means Apple should refuse, now more than ever, to release Quicktime for Linux since that would only help Linux grab and extend it's lead. The good news for Apple is that Linux is only taking market rank from it, not market share, that's coming from the MS piece of the pie. All that market share crap aside, I still want a 17" PowerBook for x-mas!

      --

      Good people do not need laws to tell them to act responsibly, while bad people will find a way around the laws-Plato
    3. Re:just wondering by zulux · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Ummmm, Apple does *not* have an 8% market share.

      Depending on the survey - Apple has anywhere from 2% to 6%.

      I put 8% as it's my hunch that Apple has a larger effective market share when it comes to people who play MP3 and watch movie trailers.

      --

      Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  3. Re:Changelog? by The+Limp+Devil · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It still doesn't minimize to the tray (single most common complaint on Windows), but maximize does make it full screen now. Otherwise there's no discernible diffeence.

  4. Re:Hmmm.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Interesting

    I'm really surprised that people are still talking about his vaporware. If you want to reencode an AAC to an MP3. Open the AAC in Soundstudio and save it as an MP3, its very easy.

  5. Re:almost unrelated Quicktime question by mcc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    MPEG, and if you pay the 30 dollars for Quicktime Pro Quicktime should be able to export to MPEG from any format it plays for you, i'm pretty sure.

  6. Fantastic. by endquotedotcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Installed the update on WinXP, rebooted, and no iTunes won't start. Nothing at all happens, really. Awesome patch.

  7. Re:Updates timing by redwoodtree · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Can't please all the people all the time. If they release a jumbo patch a bunch of people complain about why they couldn't have been broken up so they could pick and choose what they want to install.

    If they release it in pieces then everyone complains about having to install in chunks. People just love to gripe I guess it's human nature.

  8. Re:Updates timing by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Switch Software Update to only check for updates once a month, and you can have all of your updates at once, if it really causes you "madness."

    --
    Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  9. Re: This ain't even news by atheken · · Score: 2, Interesting

    actually, there was a Winamp 5 story (yesterday?)

  10. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    My main gripe with performance was that the play/pause and skip controls were slow to respond, and at times would seemingly not detect clicks. This seems to have fixed. The application also maximizes correctly now at higher resolutions, which is a big plus. It's not a revolutionary upgrade, but definately worth getting.

  11. Re:iTunes is the Devil by rsmith-mac · · Score: 3, Interesting

    While I applaud DownHillBattle for their efforts, their efforts seem to be largely composed of swinging a big mase around, hoping they hit something they should, and hoping no one notices when they hit something they shouldn't. DHB is correct, for example, in that the iTMS is built on the RIAA's terms, and helps the RIAA a bit in that way, but they also make several arguable/incorrect statements about things such as AAC compression, and how Apple gets such a large share of the sale(remember, Apple isn't making any money on the iTMS, their share pays for the bandwidth, the CC transaction, and just barely supporting the store itself). Their "solution" isn't doing their cause much good either, asking Apple to list the artist's share of the sale(something not possible, Apple has agreements with the label, not the artist; the label gets to dicate the share and doesn't have to tell a soul), and encouraging users to instead using things like Poisioned(an OSS Kazaa client) to acquire their music instead.

    I can't fault DHB for trying, but I can fault them for not trying hard enough. The site seems built more on FUD than facts, and a little bit of something resembling backmail is there too(That could really change the industry. (and we promise we'll take down the iTunes iSbogus page)).

  12. Re:Changelog? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This isn't funny at all.

  13. Re:QT: Linux client? by raydaniels · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm guessing that the reason they haven't ported Quicktime to Linux has more to do with the licenses for all the codecs that Quicktime depends on (from other vendors) and not any fault really of Apple's. Quicktime without all the codecs wouldn't really be Quicktime, and it's likely not in Apple's interest to dilute their brand for no good reason.

  14. Some changes I noticed in windows by lune+tns · · Score: 2, Interesting

    First: My beloved 'player-control' window is now accessible only by using 'ctrl+m'. The standard windows 'maximize' button now sets iTunes up to full screen.

    Second: One performance increase I noticed immediately is that it's no longer lagging when scrolling through large library lists. I have 3500+ mp3s in there, and the previous version was very choppy when scrolling. The update seems to have fixed that.

  15. Everyone missed the point! by azpcox · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The big news is that these were items that could have been announced at MacWorld SF. instead, they are released now.

    What does Steve have up his sleeve for then?

    --
    What exactly do you mean by "Don't touch this button?"
  16. Re:Hmmm.... by VoyagerRadio · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read a news item about the company that encodes the 30-second preview files for iTunes and other music services. I can't remember their name right now, but they encode directly from the master recordings. I'm not sure if they handle the entire encoding operation, though. By the way, this company is going to start offering its tools to other companies so they can start their own music services.

    --
    Harold
  17. Booting OK according to Apple by Ffakr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Um.. Apple publicly states that one prefered way to image xServes is to boot from your iPod and then copy an image from it. Apple had the Genetech guys up on stage at WWDC hawking iPods because they use them to configure their clusters.
    so.. Apple says it's OK to boot from it and iPodHacks says Apple says you can't boot from it.

    Hmn.. who to believe, who to believe?

    --

    I'm not feeling witty so bite me