Slashdot Mirror


Beagle II Successfully Separates

Control42 writes "After the long journey out, it seems that little Beagle II, the lander of the Mars express mission has successfully separated. If all goes well, the lander should touch down on Christmas Day. Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration." Reader chalker writes "In order to build public interest in the Mars Exploration Rovers 2004 missions landing in January, NASA has released a series of movie trailers (Flash enabled page, Windows Media and Quicktime formats) for what they are calling "M2K4". They contain quite amazing animations of the landings, as well as a professional artistic style typically seen in action movie trailers. Additional videos on the launch, cruise, and landing challenges can be found at the JPL based mission site."

69 of 369 comments (clear)

  1. Quote from the Martian Information Minister by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I, for one, welcome our new British overlords.

    1. Re:Quote from the Martian Information Minister by mother+pussbucket · · Score: 2, Funny

      Beagle II? Wish they'd sent Tony Poodle.

      --
      Yes, it's true. This man has no dick.
  2. Congratulations. by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Of course, the ESA has the immense advantage over NASA that everyone uses SI units, rather than a mixture of metric and imperial ;-)
    Still, its a long way down for Beagle 2 - hope it succeeds.

    --
    Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
    1. Re:Congratulations. by robsimmon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Curious -

      NASA officially uses SI units. It's the contractors who still use antiquated units.

  3. M2K4 ? by Black+Parrot · · Score: 4, Funny


    Only 5 generations 'til we get to the R2 series!

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  4. Hope by Cujo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It's probably too much to hope that we'll learn as much from the voyage of Beagle 2 as from that of Beagle 1, but that is my hope that goes with it.

    More realistically,just some good data that further constrains any theories about Martian life.

    --

    Helium balloons want to be free.

  5. Coming to a theater Near you! by Lipongo · · Score: 3, Funny

    See the Mars robot scrape up soil samples. Watch it analyse the atmosphere. Be awed by the movement over harsh landscape.

    Welcome to Mars!

    --
    -Certified TechnoWeinie
  6. Lost the Edge? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Uhh, NASA has already been to Mars, multiple times.

    1. Re:Lost the Edge? by leonardluen · · Score: 2, Interesting

      seems to me that nasa has TWO probes that are to reach mars in january. instead of a single one like the ESA. so they haven't lost the edge yet

      http://marsrovers.jpl.nasa.gov/newsroom/pressrel ea ses/20031202a.html

    2. Re:Lost the Edge? by stuntpope · · Score: 2, Insightful

      >>Appolo ? What a big money-wasting show-off.

      And what a know-it-all about what it takes to accomplish space missions! Start everything from scratch again? Rubbish.

      At the Conference on 20th & 21st Century Space Flight (Dec 18), this point was raised: Prior to Apollo, when JFK announced the goal to go to the Moon, America did not have a significant aerospace industry, with the contractor base, manufacturing capabilities, processes, and the entire infrastructure that we have now. That was all built during the Apollo missions. So even if the lunar landing was a Cold War "show-off", it paved the way for the space capabilities that we now take for granted. Just because we aren't now living on the Moon doesn't mean it was a waste (but I am disappointed we don't have a Mars base at this point -- I was 5 at Apollo 11 and thought we'd be further along in space than we are now).

  7. Direct Links to movies by zeroclip · · Score: 3, Informative

    for those of us that dosen't like to view the movies in our browsers. http://anon.nasa-global.speedera.net/anon.nasa-glo bal/M2K4/God_high.mov http://anon.nasa-global.speedera.net/anon.nasa-glo bal/M2K4/water_high.mov http://anon.nasa-global.speedera.net/anon.nasa-glo bal/M2K4/Sixminutes_high.mov

    1. Re:Direct Links to movies by zeroclip · · Score: 5, Informative

      Argh damn formatting :P

      http://anon.nasa-global.speedera.net/anon.nasa-glo bal/M2K4/God_high.mov
      http://anon.nasa-global.speedera.net/anon.nasa-glo bal/M2K4/water_high.mov
      http://anon.nasa-global.speedera.net/anon.nasa-glo bal/M2K4/Sixminutes_high.mov

  8. What edge? by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So Esa has one probe and Nasa has two. Therefore Nasa is behind?

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  9. Science is world-wide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Why do you still have to think in terms of "losing edges"? The Mars Express mission will cooperate with NASA's "Mars Odyssey" to relay data back to earth. Competition is good, cooperation is better.

  10. I did that. by presearch · · Score: 4, Funny

    Once, I had to get two beagles to seperate by spraying them with a garden hose.

  11. two-leg match by BobTheLawyer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is it childish of me to giggle at how many Americans must be mystified by the great football (as in soccer) analogy?

  12. What would religion think if they find life ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful


    what would happen ? would there be a sudden roar of disbelief or would there be a "god created life there too" statement made, of course we havent decided what consitutes life yet (from our tiny perspective), can silicon or alternativ chemicals have life ? is life just a product of complexity or can simple systems have it too ? does it have to be carbon based ?

  13. Best of British by fruey · · Score: 5, Interesting
    What I find so amazing about this (national pride aside) is that the budget is so low, and yet the science done on this mission is allegedly more complex and thorough, quoting from the Yahoo news story I just read "It will be far cheaper and contain far more science than either of the two U.S. Martian rovers that will be landed from Mars Odyssey in January."

    How is this so? Why are the US projects so much more expensive?

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    1. Re:Best of British by Gumshoe · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why are the US projects so much more expensive?


      NASA spent a shedload of money developing vehicles that can navigate the Martian terrain. This will be needed for future missions I'm certain but I don't understand why they have implemented it this early. At this stage of the game, one region of Martian terrain will be just as interesting as any other region. Why bother scooting off to "that rock over there" when "the one right next me" is just as scientifically useful?
    2. Re:Best of British by jridley · · Score: 2, Interesting

      one region of Martian terrain will be just as interesting as any other region

      Uhh, no. I went to a talk a few months ago by a planetary scientist where she talked about site selection. There was a LOT of argument about it. Mission parameters (direct-to-Mars crash landing mode) limited touchdown sites to somewhere around the equator, but there was still a lot of choice.

      The two sites look very interesting. One is a plain where there appears to be a lot of hematite, which we believe is formed primarily by iron in water. If there's really a bunch of it there, that indicates a hell of a lot of water in the past.

      The other area is in a crater where the wall has been breached, it looks like by a river, and a whole lot of debris has been washed into the crater. This means that a hell of a lot of material from a wide area will have already been washed into the area for us to look at without having to travel very far.

      All in all, I expect a really fun time the next few months.

    3. Re:Best of British by BuilderBob · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The answer is possibly related to the Scientists involved.

      The Spirit and Opportunity landers may have been made by experienced scientists in scientifically clean labs and using wind tunnels designed for the military.

      Beagle2 (not the Mars Express Orbiter) was cobbled together with pop groups and artists. There's a picture of the project PI (Collin Pillinger) pushing Beagle2 on a shopping trolley. This wasn't a "let's play up the low price tag" PR photograph. He really was transporting the lander on a shopping trolley.

      There is then the technical complications. NASA have built two remote controlled sem-autonomous rovers, they have been designed to move about on terrain which has never been seen (from the ground) before. The Sojourner rover from the 90s did very little science because it was mostly wheels and batteries. The only thing I remember from the Sojourner mission is a rock named Yogi.

      The thing that separates the two missions is really only the PR. NASA tried to get the fancy rover factor that worked well with Sojourner, and even borrowed a few tricks from Beagle2 in their "were using musical tones to represent spacecraft state".

      Beagle2, on the other hand, has a PI who can get people to work for free with the promise of fame (and fortune?). using an artist to paint a spotted calibration plate for the spectrometers/cameras which a scientist would have otherwise done. Using a pop group to play the "mission success" tune on landing (which, I have no doubt, will come through in crystal clear surround sound in the Lander Mission Control).

      Going to Mars is expensive, Beagle2 was only cheap because a 300 million Euro orbiter was going that way anyway. Venus Express is recycling the Mars Express engineering models (and will be cheap).

      It also has less than 1 in 3 chance of success (3 out of the last 5 failed). Nozomi is dead. 100 million USD doesn't buy what it used to.

      BB
    4. Re:Best of British by T-Punkt · · Score: 2, Informative

      > The Sojourner rover from the 90s did very little science because it was mostly wheels and batteries.

      I disagree, it did carry a simple but sophisticated instruments that has been used on foreign soil so far, the Alpha Proton X-Ray Spectrometer (APXS). The wheels and batteries and solar panel where just build around that instrument to make it mobile since it hat to be placed directly on the surface of the material (rock, dust) you want to investigate.

      I guess the reason you don't remember anything about it is that this instrument doesn't produce fance pictures and such, it just tells you the chemical composition of rocks and such, how boring.

    5. Re:Best of British by Textbook+Error · · Score: 2, Interesting

      pushing Beagle2 on a shopping trolley. This wasn't a "let's play up the low price tag" PR photograph. He really was transporting the lander on a shopping trolley

      It may have been a genuine photo, however he would have been pushing a shell or one of the mock-ups used for assembly testing. The actual lander itself was assembled in an Aseptic Assembly Facility (aka "clean room"), and transported to the launch site by truck on a sealed container. This container was about 2-3m on each side, and lifted into the truck on a pallet. The seal had to be intact from the time it left the AAF until it was inserted into Mars Express, as one of the biggest concerns has been that we will end up shipping some Earth microbes along with Beagle 2 - and giving false positives when it starts looking for microbes on Mars.

      Blur's call sign is simply a couple of bytes used to identify packets coming from Beagle that can be mapped to a table of notes back on earth. It will doubtless be played through a futuristic-sounding synth for PR purposes, but then how else would you "play" eight or nine bytes... :-)

      Which isn't to say the project hasn't been an incredible achievement. It's been done on an absolutely miniscule budget/schedule compared with other lander missions, and it's a real achievement to have even made it this far given the paucity of space funding in the UK.

      --

      Nae bother
  14. Bleh. by clifgriffin · · Score: 2, Funny

    NASA hasn't lost its edge, it just has a different focus.

  15. trailers by Lord_Dweomer · · Score: 3, Insightful
    "They contain quite amazing animations of the landings, as well as a professional artistic style typically seen in action movie trailers."

    Anybody else read that and get kind of disappointed? I mean...I guess it would make it slightly more interesting, but EVERYBODY these days is turning things into action movie trailers. Hell, the whole "War on Terror" on the news seemed like a bunch of teasers and trailers for a big upcoming blockbuster (no pun intended).

    I know they're trying to reach a broader audience, and I know they have to compete with Hollywood, but if they need to sink to the level of an action movie trailer to make science interesting then I think we are in trouble.

    --
    Buy Steampunk Clothing Online!
  16. Re:What edge? by azzy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yeah.. 'cause Beagle 2 will be playing Blur tunes when it lands... it's hip and cool!

  17. Anyone else think it's kinda sad ... by Chitlenz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That a government agency needs marketing and promotional materials? Maybe the x-prize or the Chinese advancements will finally get people back into the 'space' mindset again. We've kind of lost the forward thinking momentum of the first shuttle and moon mission launches where EVERYTHING in America stopped to watch it happen.

    --
    Imagination is the silver lining of Intelligence.
  18. Brit spacecraft? by mj01nir · · Score: 4, Funny

    British-made spacecraft? Damn, that's gonna be impossible to find parts for.

    --
    the no .sig .sig
    1. Re:Brit spacecraft? by JanneM · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yep - they finally found a satellite design capable of leaking oil!

      Seriously, the design and impetus is British, but the project is very much an european effort. Big congratulations to everyone.

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
    2. Re:Brit spacecraft? by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Let's just hope the electrical wasn't contracted out to Lucas.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  19. I don't think it would be a big deal by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm a practicing agnostic, but I know several quite religious people who also believe in life elsewhere in the Universe. It's not that big of a deal, really. The question tends to be raised by those with a stereotypical view of "religious people". Always try to remember that in our society the most vocal and visible members of any group are the Gaussian tail types.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  20. Webcast by MagPulse · · Score: 3, Informative

    Here's the Mars Express Webcast. They talk about the training missions they went through and some of the science they'll be doing while they get telemetry in about how the separation was going.

    And the post doesn't make clear that this is all EESA, the Beagle has nothing to do with NASA or its probes.

  21. Merry Christmas, Mars by H8X55 · · Score: 5, Funny

    "After the long journey out, it seems that little Beagle II, the lander of the Mars express mission has successfully separated. If all goes well, the lander should touch down on Christmas Day."

    Awwww, how cute, we gave Mars an Aibo for Christmas...

  22. It definitely has separated ok by EricTheRed · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've just seen the first picture taken by Mars Express of Beagle 2 just after it separated.

    I think this is the first time a spacecraft has taken a picture of another outside of earth orbit (ie the only previous ones are manned missions in either Earth or Lunar orbit).

    --
    Java gaming nut - http://www.retep.org/ or for the rail http://uktra.in/
    1. Re:It definitely has separated ok by aallan · · Score: 2, Informative

      You havn't by any chance an URL ? Or are they not published yet ?

      You can find it here.

      The bright spot on the left-hand side of this picture is the back side of Beagle 2, slowly drifting away from Mars Express. This image, taken this morning (19-Dec-2003) at 9:33 CET, shows the lander when it was about 20 metres away from the mother spacecraft, on its way to Mars. - ESA, 19 Dec. 2003
      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
  23. ok, try this by Bill,+Shooter+of+Bul · · Score: 2, Informative

    Then please explain to me where the edge is. What is the basis for the comment in the blurb? Nasa alreadly has 2 orbiters at mars, Last touched down 9 years ago, has sent probes to every planet and the sun, and The Esa has sent one to mars ( and also one to the sun If I remeber correctly).

    --
    Well.. maybe. Or Maybe not. But Definitely not sort of.
  24. Separation pic by mlush · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is a link to the seperation picture of Beagle 2 taken by Mars Express

  25. Re:What edge? by Scarblac · · Score: 2, Funny

    ESA has two as well - the part of Beagle that's going to land, and the part that's staying in orbit :-)

    --
    I believe posters are recognized by their sig. So I made one.
  26. Beagle's not ESA either by EricTheRed · · Score: 4, Informative

    Beagle 2 wasn't funded by ESA either, they just piggybacked for the trip.

    There was a lot of publicity by the Beagle 2 team over the last few years to get the funding. The UK government only put in (I think) 2 million after they had the promise of other institutions would pay up (and I'm not sure they have got the money back yet).

    The mission is almost entirely privately paid for.

    The only link with NASA is that they will be relaying the first signal to see if it landed ok, and ESA agreed to allow Express to be used as a relay for NASA's rovers.

    --
    Java gaming nut - http://www.retep.org/ or for the rail http://uktra.in/
  27. Re:What edge? by zeux · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And why is everybody always looking at space exploration as 'a race' or a 'competition' ?

    What about trying to make an international Mars mission ?

    I know that maybe ISS is not very useful, but it certainly is a success in terms of engineering and many countries took part in it.

    What about doing the same for Mars ?

  28. You forget. by maroberts · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Lots of British hold lovingly to their pounds, gallons and miles per hour.

    Even the documentation I saw used non-SI units, so the possibility of a screw up still exists.

    --

    Donte Alistair Anderson Roberts - hi son!
    Karma: Chameleon

    1. Re:You forget. by perly-king-69 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Well our currency (Pounds Sterling) was metricised in the 1970's. 100 pence = 1 GBP.

      Petrol has been sold in litres for about 10 years.

      Metric units have been taught for years (30+?) in schools.

      Our national mapping agency, the OS, produce maps with grids in metres or kilometres.

      Everything apart from the road network is marked up in metric form. We still use miles for the road network though.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

  29. The BBC's Take... by merikus · · Score: 4, Informative
    The BBC has a good summary of the descent, and the mission generally, at "Beagle glides solo towards Mars."

    A good resource if you had no clue what was going on, like me.

  30. Because when you have to much money ... by zeux · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ... you tend to waste it.

    NASA as a weak budget but it was used to very big fundings during the cold war.

    In Europ space has never been a top priority and fundings have always been really limited. When you have less you try to optimize everything and you tend to do better for cheaper.

    Look at the Pathfinder mission with Sojourner. It was a Nasa mission but a mission without a very big funding. It was a tremendous success.

    1. Re:Because when you have to much money ... by JanneM · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Actually a different budget constraint ended up pushing NASA ahead; in the early sixties, the russian rockets were way more powerful than the american ones, so very tight weight and size constraints forced the american efforts to focus much harder on miniaturization. This, in the end, proved to be a much more effective edge than bigger launch vehicles.

      I hate to say this (as I am a scientist myself, and appreciate funding as much as the next guy), but constraints are in many cases a great motivator and focusing lens on what is truly important. With a nearly unlimited monetary/time/resource-budget, you'd likely waste most of it on nonessentials; in many cases perhaps the essentials would never even be identified, but lost in the sea of nice-to-haves.

      Naturally, the above does in no way affect my particular work, which is always essential and topical, so please do not hesitate to send me lots of money, ok? :)

      --
      Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  31. We'll see how it goes... by Glock27 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration.

    Seems to me that we should wait for the probe to actually land, power up, and communicate before we judge how far the EU has caught up.

    With some of the coming propulsion breakthroughs, these missions are just scratching the surface (so to speak;) anyhow.

    --
    Galileo: "The Earth revolves around the Sun!"
    Score: -1 100% Flamebait
  32. Waiting for news by Hieronymus+Howard · · Score: 2, Funny

    So we're now just waiting for the news that the Beagle has landed.

    HH

  33. Godspeed the Beagle, but don't count eggs yet by pease1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The national pride in this thread is great to read, but if I were a brit, I wouldn't be counting my eggs yet just because the chicken has started to squawk.

    There are still many things that can go wrong; remember the poor record of successful missions to Mars spans all countries... Russian, Soviet, US and now Japanese.

    For one thing, be sure to keep an eye on growing dust storms on Mars... they appear to be mostly confined to the southern hemisphere now, but that might change... and Beagle 2 is landing at only 11 degrees north.

    We ALL stand to gain from a successful Beagle 2 mission as well as successful NASA missions.

  34. Re:Oh, God... by aldoman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ugh. I've lived in England for 15 years now, and the one thing that I know is that 70% of British people speak almost undecipherable English - the accents are very heavy in most (especially) northern palces. In Inner city areas, you would have problems understanding how much a newspaper costs. That's how bad the dialects are - it makes a good ol' Southern accent seem like a tiny difference.

  35. Not to mention, the fat lady has not sung yet. by ronmon · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The lander is completely unpowered as far as propulsion goes. The separation was successful, but there is still plenty that can go wrong. And the same for the two NASA probes. Let's see how it all shakes out before making any conclusions.

  36. ET life was suggested by Christ himself by s20451 · · Score: 2, Informative

    John 10:16: "I have other sheep, which are not of this fold; ..."

    Some suggest that this passage implies that there is intelligent life other than on Earth. It's a little thin, but other religious beliefs have sprung out of even more tenuous evidence. At the very least, if ET life is found, the Christians could point to this passage and say, "We knew all along ...".

    --
    Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
    1. Re:ET life was suggested by Christ himself by s20451 · · Score: 4, Informative

      Sorry to reply to my own post, but I just remembered that the Catholics have a whole doctrine on extraterrestrial life (can't find a link right now, sorry).

      One Vatican astronomer says the possibility that humanity is alone in the universe is madness. Weirdly, the Jesuit order maintains observatories for the Vatican, some of which do important astrophysical research!

      --
      Toronto-area transit rider? Rate your ride.
  37. Re:Lost The Edge My Ass by G.+W.+Bush+Junior · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How did this get modded insightful?

    Viewing the science and exploration as a competition makes it appear like you are more interested in the nationalistic aspects of it than the scientific.

    IF you have to discuss it, the "we've sent waaay more robotic explorers out there" is a pretty bad point.

    I live in Denmark, we had Vikings; The vikings ruled the sea for a very long time. After that we had a LARGE fleet that was comparable to the english for the better part of 18th and 19th century.
    Now we can just sit back on our asses for the next couple of decades and STILL have ruled the sea for longer than the americans...
    This obviously translates into: Danish sailors kicks american sailor ass.
    just like NASA kicks everyone elses ass because they went to the moon before everyone else.

    --
    "I don't know that Atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots." -George H.W. Bush
  38. NASA's Record by WindBourne · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Seems that NASA has actually lost the edge in robotic space exploration.

    Nasa is about to place several landers on mars shortly after beagle. They have landed 3 others on mars already (not including 2 that "landed" :) ). There are 2 orbiting mars taking pix (one of which I have code helping to control the cams). NASA sends up 1 or more robotic missions per year. The beagle is EU's first real robotic mission. Other than the US, only Russia has done and robotic missions. NASA has not lost the edge.

    They have lost their funding for various missions which makes them the same as Russia. They have had politicians control what missions take place (by providing moneys for their own local fat cats).

    --
    I prefer the "u" in honour as it seems to be missing these days.
  39. Re:Oh, God... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 2, Funny
    So what you have basically established is that all "Martians" will be stereotypes of British nations and colonies when in actual fact a fairly substantial amount of these people don't drink tea and think that cricket is the most boring game ever.

    Precisely. :-)

    You see, the Martians are very adaptable, like the aliens in Alien Nation.

    And another thing- wait.. is it me, or we arguing over a slur against a nonexistent species?

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  40. Creationism? by manganese4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    So to give equal time to the creationists, will NASA be required to launch a probe called Eden++ or Turbo Ark?

    --
    I make my face look like this and concerned words come out.
  41. The beagle has landed.... by skywhale · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, maybe not yet. I couldn't wait any longer.. :)

    --
    :wq!
  42. Mirror by swordboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    In case of slashdotting, there is a mirror here.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  43. Re:Oh, God... by 2sheds · · Score: 2, Funny

    Bloody Southern fairies.... ;-)

    --

    Absit Invidia
  44. Why are these not open formats? by jridley · · Score: 2, Insightful

    These movies were paid for by NASA, which mean they were paid for by me, and all us taxpayers. How come they're in DRM'd formats? Even if they want to use WMV, fine, but give me an unprotected download link.

    In the past I've borrowed the VHS from a NASA ambassador and encoded it myself, but why should I have to?

  45. Re:Oh for Chrissakes... by leonardluen · · Score: 2, Insightful

    exactly, it is an exciting time, because there will be 3 probes on mars!

    i am not trying to say hey look "our probe is bigger than your probe" that was sort of started in the by the article itself...

    and competition is good, maybe the ESA will find something NASA doesn't

  46. Slashdot's Antipolicy by mattr · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope the spacecraft does well. I also wish it was possible to read an honest science story without the jabs from left field. Lost their edge? This is based on who's historical revisionism?

    Is it rocket science for Slashdot to hire editors who would be considered satisfactory for any other publication to ensure that thousands of people do not have to have a moment of pristine delight spoiled by an editorial policy that rewards knee-jerk jingoism? And how is this even calculated when hours earlier photos were shown from the incredible Spitzer Telescope, which took off from the Cape Canaveral launch facility after being built between the U.S., U.K., and the Netherlands?

    It's a simple backhanded comment like this that obviously makes a lot of people feel like they're being fed shit when they could be spending their energy more productively. Geek editor you are unfortunately thy worst enemy. Poster, keep it in your pants! Slashdot, please quickly hire some talent, dudes!

  47. Beagle software by orbitalia · · Score: 5, Informative

    Having been involved with space work a bit the software aspect of the Beagle lander is quite interesting - the reason I know about it is we used the same compiler on the Galileo signal generator project.

    ADA is still very popular amongst the European space companies and agencies (for a good reason I think) and particularly the ADA95 Ravenscar profile which gives a miniscule runtime the actual runtime is only about 4-5k which is pretty good considering that contains everything you need to execute the ADA code including tasking.

    There is another opensource attempt at a ravenscar compiler called openravenscar funded by ESA here - for Sparc and Intel platforms . Ravenscar is basically a profile that removes the more complex features of the ADA languages to give a mathetmatically provable scheduling - so you can always cater for your worst case scenario. Such small executives are neccessary due to the prohibitive cost of rad hard EEPROMs as most missions have some sort of inflight reprogramming requirements. I think they are using the ERC32 processor which again, is an open source processor, along with its replacement LEON, you can even download the vhdl for the Sparc based leon here

    Heres hoping Beagle makes it through the Martian atmosphere and takes some pictures of little green men.

  48. Oh for the love of everything holy by sunbeam60 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Must this be an issue EVERYTIME something is specificall attested to NASA or ESA.

    "Bu hu, look at what the Americans can do!" "Bu hu, we'll build or own GPS and you can get lost!" "Bu hu, the Euro is strong, the dollar is weak" "Bu hu, we saved you weakling European ass in WWI and WWII".

    At least the academic world is less teritorial.

    Whatever NASA does, ESA will get all the data they ask for.

    Whatever ESA does, NASA will get all the data they ask for.

    I hope, for one, that we plant the flag of humanity once we take that small first step on the surface of Mars.

    Last time I checked we all belonged to that race.

    1. Re:Oh for the love of everything holy by dotwaffle · · Score: 2, Interesting

      "Bu hu, look at what the Americans can do!"

      Yup, they can land on the moon to show off to the Russians they are better!

      "Bu hu, we'll build or own GPS and you can get lost!"

      Too right, for the simple reason that every time the US goes to war, we don't want to have crap GPS in Europe. Put simply, if we owned it, it'd stay up all the time, rather than bowing to political pressure.

      "Bu hu, the Euro is strong, the dollar is weak"

      But the GBP is in the middle reaping the benefits!

      "Bu hu, we saved you weakling European ass in WWI and WWII".

      Bollocks... You haven't won a war. Ever. Well, apart from your own Civil War, and you couldn't lose! The Allies won WWII, thanks to the Russians, thanks to the British, and in part thanks to the Americans. That's because we were allied. The Americans don't get to steal the thunder, no sir. WWI was in fact won by the British by the way, the British were helped by the Americans, in such small numbers, that we would have won anyway. Just remember, we won through negotiation with the enemy, not blowing them to smithereens. November 11th, 11am, a day each Briton remembers that those who died, did die for a just cause, and that it would have been worse had negotiations have been abandoned. Maybe the US could learn a lesson from the Europeans... Beating the crap out of people isn't always the greatest idea.

      Not an attack on Americans there, just America and it's politics. Americans are generally nice people, they just have a really shitty government. Move here to Britain while you still can! ;)

    2. Re:Oh for the love of everything holy by AaronGTurner · · Score: 2

      And as for the European theatre, I suppose Monty would have run circles around Rommel just the same without the American landings in North Africa. Right. So much for El Alamein. The only victories Britain managed without American help was the sinking of a few Nazi battleships-- Graf Spee and Bismark-- early in the war.

      The whole point of being allied is to help each other and avoid the need to do things alone! United we stand, etc. At the Normandy landings 50% of the troops landing were from the USA, the other 50% were from the commonwealth, and from other nations who had lost their countries to the Germans. The balance tipped in the favour of US numbers from June 1944 onwards.

      By yourselves you had great success at Dunkirk, Norway, the Balkans, Greece, Crete and Singapore.

      Early in the war the UK was on the defensive in the same way that the USA was in, say, the Philipines. In the same way that MacArthur eventually returned to the Philipines, the UK also ultimately took part in victories against the Germans and Japanese. To be partisan about it is pretty silly.

    3. Re:Oh for the love of everything holy by AaronGTurner · · Score: 2

      Yes. Everyone contributed. People can wave penises about over who won it more than anyone else, but many nations contributed. The UK helped win by holding out and providing a base. The Polish and Czech pilots were invaluable in the Battle of Britain. The Greeks and British delaying the Italians in the Balkans delayed Barbarossa. US trucks and planes were instrumental in helping to keep the USSR going. The USSR contributed a lot of human resources. Norweigan heroes helped destroy any chance of the Germans developing atomic weapons. The French resistance and Free French made a vital contribution too. All round a group effort to a noble end.

  49. MER Animation by captaineo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I created all of the animation in these pieces associated with NASA's MER mission.
    The best way to view them is the 9-minute launch-to-landing music video at:

    http://athena.cornell.edu/the_mission/rov_video.ht ml

    And downloads including a DVD-spec MPEG-2 stream at:

    http://www.maasdigital.com/gallery.html

    I also made a bunch of new animation for a NOVA documentary, "Mars, Dead or Alive," which will be shown on PBS January 4-6 (the first MER landing is late night Jan. 3).

    The trailers NASA made look neat. Wish they had used our 24p master rather than interlaced video sources though.

  50. Mars Express info... by rlink · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There is a US experiment on Mars Express, part of the ASPERA-3 (Analyzer of Space Plasma and Energetic Atoms, http://www.aspera-3.org/) instrument package. I'm a member of the science team for this instrument, and you can see some of my computer simulations of the interaction of energetic space plasmas with the Mars environment at http://www.aspera-3.org/model.pdf.

    Here's an email I got yesterday:

    Dear colleagues,

    We are very close to our target! On Dec. 19 Beagle - 2 will be separated
    and on Dec. 25 Mars Orbit Insertion executed. ESA is going to cover both
    events on live TV on the ESA television and, of course, Internet. Below
    follows a short time table for the main events.

    All times are in CET (Central European Time ) = UT + 1

    December 19
    07:51 go/no-go decision to proceed with Beagle-2 ejection
    08:21 spacecraft slew starts
    08:51 spacecraft slew ends
    09:31 first confirmation of separation

    ESA TV sending
    09:00 - 09:32 approx. (Internet 09:09 - 09:32) First sequence
    11:25 - 11:47 approx. (Internet 11:25 - 11:47) Second sequence
    12:00 - 12:10 approx. (Internet 12:00 - 12:10) Third sequence

    December 24
    21:00 MOI "go / no go"

    December 25
    02:47 MOI execution
    02:50 Beagle 2 landing
    05:15 Beagle 2 contact with Mars Odyssey

    I will inform you about exact times of ESA TV live sending for December
    25 later.

    The permanent ESA channel:
    Astra 2C at 19 degrees East
    Transponder 57, horizontal, MPEG-2, MCPC
    Frequency 10832 MHz, Symbol Rate 22000 MS/sec, FEC=5/6
    Service name: ESA TV

    Merry Christmas,
    Stas

    and another one ...

    Check out ESA's picture of Beagle-2 now
    separated from Mars Express.

    http://www.esa.int/export/esaCP/index.html

    Cheers,
    Rick