Slashdot Mirror


Linux-Based Robot To Explore The Forest

crashoverride025 contributes this link to a BBC story about Treebot, "A Linux-based mobile robot equipped with a webcam and sensors swings into action to help monitor forests." Despite the Tarzan reference, it looks like this robot moves along a cable, rather than swinging from place to place.

84 comments

  1. Oh, just great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now the forests are going to be polluted with non-indigenous directory trees!

    --
    Rate Naked People at FuckMeter (not work-safe)

    1. Re:Oh, just great... by beacher · · Score: 1, Funny

      It'll use Banyan vines to communicate too... -B

    2. Re:Oh, just great... by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

      It will be fine as long as these robots don't start dumping core all over the place.

  2. The lighter side of forest fires... by odano · · Score: 1, Funny

    I hope they have a good HSF, lest it overheat and start a forest fire.

    1. Re:The lighter side of forest fires... by AchmedHabib · · Score: 1

      yes, I am picturing it racing along it's wire, ablaze with a trail of smoke and fire while the scientists scream, we can't stop it, it is completely autonomous..

      (OSQ:solar powered! will they ever learn)

  3. Apparently this is their third attempt by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1, Funny
    • One Bot
    • Two Bot
    • ???
    --
    Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  4. Not To Rain On Anyone's Parade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    But this has actually been done before according to a Yahoo! News article from early this year. And yes, this is actually a different project, not the same one from the article.

    1. Re:Not To Rain On Anyone's Parade by bedessen · · Score: 1

      Lookee there, it's tubgirl. Guess who's moderating without checking links...

  5. what leads to... by demonhold · · Score: 3, Insightful

    what we all agreed before...

    probes sent to mars should've been run by linux. Instead of worrying us to no end, now we would be discussing the data obtained and ways of improving the performance of futere missions.

    Not only that, I'm sure that the code for those probes beeing opensource would've meant people contributing and finding solutions and apps no one would've thought of...

    Wouldn't it be lovely that the routines of a mission to space would've been a truly world project, with programmers from all over the world taking part in it?

    Well, I'm dreaming, maybe I'm not...

    --
    ... y Dios vio que Linux era bueno... Genesis 99.666
    1. Re:what leads to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, I'm sure that Linux would solve an antenna that gets stuck or a broken solar panel, or a frozen propellant line, or...

      Most of these probes seem to fail due to hardware problems, not software problems. Changing the OS wouldn't make a difference. Besides, why use a complex general-purpose OS if you can use a specific one that's optimised for the hardware? These probes use old 8-bit and 16-bit processors, because modern processors are too sensitive (due to smaller process sizes) to cosmic radiation. You may be able to get Linux on them but really, why bother?

      Lourens

    2. Re:what leads to... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 4, Informative

      probes sent to mars should've been run by linux

      Are you kidding? what do you think they run, Windows?

      Linux is great, but nowhere near the level of certification required for software that runs on space probes. The latter, as well as software running on airplane computers, space shuttles, etc ... are so strictly checked that many parts of them are proven mathematically, with great care, at great expenses.

      Just propose NASA or ESA to power their stuff with Linux and they'll probably look at you with a thin smile and the kind of condescending look one makes while shooing a slightly annoying retarded child.

      --
      "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    3. Re:what leads to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try again, windows is not a certified OS and is not used for flight critical functions in airplanes. VxWorks, VRTX and QNX are currently the main certified OS's used aboard aircraft. Of course the TV screen support might be run by MS

    4. Re:what leads to... by demonhold · · Score: 1

      so NASA uses LINUX after all...

      who's the retarded child then?

      well I guess you didn't mean it as an insult

      --
      ... y Dios vio que Linux era bueno... Genesis 99.666
    5. Re:what leads to... by loosewing · · Score: 0

      "probes sent to mars should've been run by linux.Instead of worrying us to no end, now we would be discussing the data obtained and ways of improving the performance of futere missions.
      "

      Yeah but then the discussion would then be WHAT DISTRO and THAT would take a lot more time than sending it to mars.

    6. Re:what leads to... by pcmanjon · · Score: 1

      Thats the whole point. NASA doesn't want anyone but them contributing to the project. They think they're smart enough and have it under control. They don't think they need help from anybody else.

    7. Re:what leads to... by ShwAsasin · · Score: 1

      Actually not all airplane computers run sophisticated O/S's. I work for a company that produces GPS guidance/navigation systems for planes/helicopters and our systems use Ms-Dos 6.22, no joke. We're slowly moving our systems to Linux (if everything goes well it'll be done by June) but we've used Dos since '86 in aircraft.

  6. An Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Instead of remotely viewing a forest over the web, maybe a walk would solve some problems?

    1. Re:An Alternative by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If linux is deployed in the forest... does anybody hear it?

  7. If a treebot falls in the forest... by JamesP · · Score: 0, Funny

    does it throw an exception???

    --
    how long until /. fixes commenting on Chrome?
  8. If a treebot falls... by gibbonboy · · Score: 1

    ..does it make a sound? My favorite line is "helps by being stealthy enough to travel through the forest canopy along specially-constructed cabling, night and day." Stealthy, riiight- it might scare the trees or the atmosphere.

    --
    "Never pet a burning dog."
    1. Re:If a treebot falls... by michaelhood · · Score: 1, Funny

      Am I the only one who would be absolutely FREAKED OUT if I were camping, and saw in the distance some faint shiny object hovering above us?

  9. I agree! Very original! MOD UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ntext

  10. Ooh Treebot... by Xpilot · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hooom... no one cares about the trees or free sharing of code anymore...it's all FUD and copyrights and lawsuits.... hooomm... time to rouse the forest!

    We come, we come with roll of drum: ta-runda runda runda rom!
    We come, we come with horn and drum: ta-runa runa runa rom!
    To Redmond! Though Redmond be ringed and barred with doors of stone;
    Though Redmond be strong and hard, as cold as stone and bare as bone,
    We go, we go, we go to war, to hew the stone and break the door;
    For bole and bough are burning now, the furnace roars - we go to war!
    To land of gloom with tramp of doom, with roll of drum, we come, we come;
    To Redmond with doom we come!
    With doom we come, with doom we come!


    --
    "Backups are for wimps. Real men upload their data to an FTP site and have everyone else mirror it." -- Linus Torvalds
  11. Re:what the hell? by mOoZik · · Score: 1

    It happens from time to time. Who cares who submits it? Just enjoy the discussion. :)

  12. So the questions will be answered by dcw3 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Finally, we'll find out...

    * Do bears shit in the woods?
    * If a tree falls and nobody's there to hear it, does it make a sound?
    * Is the Pope Catholic...

    Oh well, maybe 2 out of 3.

    --
    Just another day in Paradise
  13. Re:what the hell? by powlow · · Score: 1

    doesn't seem to be much discussion going on...
    plus that makes me a bit less inclined to submit stories...oh well...

  14. Ooooh a webcam! by Capt'n+Hector · · Score: 1

    From the grant proposal: "As a source for ongoing additional funds, all Jane movies will be made available on a subscription website."

    --
    Quid festinatio swallonis est aetherfuga inonusti?
    Africus aut Europaeus?
  15. The important question is by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 1

    What runs the Jane robot? FreeBSD?
    And Cheetah? Unixware?

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
    1. Re:The important question is by Crypto+Gnome · · Score: 1

      And here was I thinking the JaneBOT would be running OpenBSD.

      --
      Visit CryptoGnome in his home.
  16. Yes but. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    What happens if the kernel inside of it panics. I mean there are a lot of hazards in a jungle. It would be a lot better to use a specialised os than Linux. You cant just press a button to reboot it when its in the middle of nowhere. Linux is okay when its sitting on a rack serving up web pages or doing general workstation tasks, but when your in the forest, who knows what could happen.

    1. Re:Yes but. by ShadowRage · · Score: 1

      especially those horny monkeys. sheesh.

  17. Re:what the hell? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I just submitted this story and now its been credited to crashoverride025
    You should have used the nickname "acidburn001." Mess with the best, die like the rest!
  18. Re:what the hell? by cioxx · · Score: 1

    The story isn't some ground-shattering news item, just a BBC link. There was no work involved on your behalf to do research or waste considerable amount of time.

    Harry Truman once said, "It's amazing what you can accomplish if you don't care who gets the credit"

  19. Re:what the hell? by powlow · · Score: 1

    i suppose, just outraged at first look! true...it really isn't that big a deal...

  20. stealth by Pompatus · · Score: 3, Funny

    helps by being stealthy enough to travel through the forest canopy along specially-constructed cabling

    I suppose a piece of metal crashing through tree branches hanging from a cable is more stealthy than, say a jackhammer. Wouldn't it be more quiet if many sensors were placed about the forest and used wifi to connect and send information? They could even still run linux to do so and get mentioned on slashdot!

    --

    ----
    Squirrel ... It's not just for breakfast anymore
    1. Re:stealth by Eevee · · Score: 1

      I know it's a far stretch, but it's entirely possible that the team placing the cables might have, umm, you know, actually looked at the area while they worked. I know it's a bit of a challange for a college student to be able to identify branches, let alone avoid them while stringing the cables; but that's why they have advisors.

      As far as placing other sensors...well, if you had read a little bit farther in the article:

      ...and it talks to other fixed sensors on the ground around the forest.
    2. Re:stealth by aXis100 · · Score: 2, Informative

      WiFi and tres dont mux well.

      1) Trees contain water. Water attentuates microwaves really well.

      2) Microwaves have a similar waevlength to leaves - lots of diffraction/

    3. Re:stealth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Wouldn't it be more quiet if many sensors were placed about the forest and used wifi to connect and send information?"

      The trees... they're... whispering...

    4. Re:stealth by SpaceJunkie · · Score: 1

      I must admit- although I am 100% robot advocate - I would consider a wi-fi distributed net a better use of resources. But I would agree with a real tree-climbing/swinging robot(not a robot on a rope) for the purpose of placing such things - as well as counting/tracking animal populations, and scaring off would be poachers and loggers.

      To be fair- a machine does not necesarily need to be all mobile to be classified as a robot anyway. I would imagine a wi-fi net of sensors to gather info in a forest just as much a use of robotic technology.

      --
      OrionRobots.co.uk - Robots From sol
    5. Re:stealth by Demodian · · Score: 2, Funny

      So basically, you are saying it can't see the forest for the trees...

  21. What this article doesn't touch upon: NIMS AI. by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 2, Informative

    What this article really doens't say much about is that NIMS isn't just an open source program for controlling robots, it's a program developed by grants given to UCLA to develop AI, or Ambient Intelligence in this isntance. This robot isn't entirely remote controlled, and though the article touches on continual monitoring, it doesn't say that it's using open source robot AI developed by UCLA.

    For more info about NIMS:

    UCLA doc in PDF

    Google HTML Cache

  22. Cannibal Holocaust 2.. by Channard · · Score: 2, Funny

    .. featuring web cam footage of the tragic demise of a team of SCO lawyers who went into the woods to impound the robot due to the makers not paying the Linux license fees for it, only to be eaten by a tribe of hithertoe unknown Cannibalistic Californian Forest Dwellers.

    1. Re:Cannibal Holocaust 2.. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 1

      This time the director is put on trial and forced to prove that the horrific murders really did take place and none of the actors made it out or he will be send down the slammer for getting our hopes up.

      --

      MMO Quests are like orgasms:

      You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

  23. hmmm fark? by muyuubyou · · Score: 1

    I'd say it's been the fark effect. Read: the post description is more amusing than the story itself.

    Probably if you included Tarzan in your post you'd have get it. You know, makes it easier for those who don't RTFA to make quick jokes.

  24. Re:what the hell? - me too by sparkes · · Score: 0

    2003-12-29 08:55:57 Linux powered tarzan robots (articles,linux) (rejected)

    I have suffered a dodgy cable to my sky tv box, a powercut, my second best laptop burst into flames, and now rejection by slashdot. oh woe is me.

  25. Routing to a mobile wireless sensor network node by dtmos · · Score: 2, Informative

    As the article says, the treebot is part of a "Networked Infomechanical System", a type of wireless sensor network, developed by the UCLA Center for Embedded Networked Sensing. The forest network is used to develop practical wireless sensing technology while simultaneously providing an example of its utility. The use of a mobile network node in a wireless sensor network requires some engineering of the multihop message routing protocol, since such networks are usually assumed to have stationary nodes. I don't know what they've done to address this; it could be anything from MANET-style routing (e.g., AODV, in which they accept the resulting increase in route establishment overhead), to a quasi-static approach in which the treebot reassociates to the network every time it stops.

  26. You mean like this ? by ErrorBase · · Score: 2, Informative
  27. Additional karma whoring by dtmos · · Score: 1

    Oh, and I forgot to mention the NIMS website, which has a lot more pretty pictures.

  28. Tarzan, this Bot Ain't by Spencerian · · Score: 0

    Despite the change of venue, the bot, nor the scientists who created it, are going to get laid.

    Hell, Tarzan had fewer cycles than the box they have swinging from tree to tree, but rain is the only way that box or its makers are going to get wet...

    --
    Vos teneo officium eram periculosus ut vos recipero is.
  29. NASA Take Note by protocoldroid · · Score: 1

    Maybe NASA should take note and start using Linux to save tax payer money powering their multi million dollar space shuttle toilets. If robots can watch logs, they can flush 'em too.

  30. Design Screwup by CrankyFool · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I heard about this some time ago. I seem to recall that due to the fact it's travelling along the tree tops, it has a problem actually seeing the forest because the trees get in the way ...

  31. Re:what the hell? - me too by powlow · · Score: 1

    seek counseling....?

  32. NASA breaks GPL by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    FlightLinux is a customized copy of a standard Linux distribution, adapted to the unique environment of a spacecraft embedded control computer.

    The first instance of FlightLinux will be on the 80386EX processor of the currently in-orbit UoSat-12 spacecraft, of Surrey Space Technology, Ltd (UK). As a basis, we are currently using the ELKS distribution, due to its small size. We will migrate to BlueCat Linux from LynuxWorks, and add real-time features as required.

    [...]

    At the moment, we have not posted any downloadable code, due to issues of export restrictions on satellite control software.

    --

    --
    make install -not war

    1. Re:NASA breaks GPL by geekoid · · Score: 1

      It's only a violation if they are distributing it. If you are not distributing it, you do not have to release the source.

      It would be neat to take a look tho'

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  33. My Precious... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I wonder if we can spots them Hobbits... yesh...

  34. Re:what the hell? by commodoresloat · · Score: 1

    You've discovered the slashdot conspiracy against you.

  35. Re:what the hell? by powlow · · Score: 1

    define discovered...

  36. "rather than swinging from place to place" by andr0meda · · Score: 1


    "rather than swinging from place to place."

    This is one of those comments that make you say "well, duh!", and then somebody just goes on and invents something that does this. It is quite a challenge on numerous levels.. would be impressive if someone pulled this one off..

    --
    With great power comes great electricity bills.
  37. Save the Forest by cattail.nu · · Score: 1

    Put cables with robots in every forest! They'll get in the way of people trying to cut down trees. Wait. How much will the forest be impacted by installation, maintenance, and resulting debris?

  38. HOW? was Re:NASA breaks GPL by mefus · · Score: 1

    Using Linux in any way you choose is not restricted by the GPL.

    Restrictions based on agreement with the licensing conditions of the GPL are limited to the manner by which YOU offer code up for distribution.

    So if NASA chooses not to distribute their copy of the code, how are they in violation of the GPL?

    (I admit I'm not sure how, in this case, distribution within an organization might be regarded by the FSF law team.)

    --
    mefus
    In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
  39. Hey moderators! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's a joke! Insightful? You need to rethink that one.

  40. dumb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "It can move where it likes, night and day"

    NO IT CAN'T! IT IS ON A FREAKIN' CABLE..what a bunch of idiots.

    make one that can actually swing around like tarzan, and I'll be interested. until then...

  41. Re:HOW? by Doc+Ruby · · Score: 1

    Where does the organization end, an another begin? NASA is a good place to examine this murky, yet fundamental, factor of the GPL. Can the GSFC use it internally, without triggering the distribution clauses? All of NASA? The US Federal Government? US Citizens? The American People?

    --

    --
    make install -not war

  42. Neat. by ghost. · · Score: 1

    Maybe they can use this device to finally find those poor kids out in the woods near Burkittsville, MD. They've been missing since 1994, I understand.

    --
    Bush is a cylon.
  43. Re:HOW? by mefus · · Score: 1

    Where does the organization end, an another begin?

    If the source code is provide to the recipient, it is a moot point. The GPL has been satisfied.

    Presumably this would only happen where (satellite) security concerns have been satisfied.

    --
    mefus
    In Open Society, GPL Software frees YOU!
  44. THE Forest? by azteca79 · · Score: 1

    Fangorn Forest?

    --
    EHC
  45. Treebot hunting rules by fjm03 · · Score: 1

    While a year around season should be maintained for treebots, shotguns should be limited to 20 gague or smaller, a bag and possession limit of three bots per week should be imposed and it should be considered bad etiquette to shoot a stationary bot.

  46. Poster is a troll by eclectro · · Score: 1


    he wants you to click his website URL

    --
    Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"