Slashdot Mirror


Israel's Finance Ministry To Distribute OpenOffice

dudeman2 writes "Israel National News reports that The Israel Finance Ministry said Sunday it will begin distributing Open Office for free as of next week. The ministry said that it would begin to distribute thousands of Open Office CD-ROMs at public computer centers and later on at community centers throughout the country, 'in a bid to reduce the technological gap between the rich and poor in Israel'."

54 of 521 comments (clear)

  1. Re:My experience as a consultant for the Israelis by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "FINAL SOLUTION" is perhaps not the best choice of words. :)

  2. Fantastic! by Limburgher · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Now this is a page the U.S. SHOULD take from Israel's playbook!

    Not to the start a flamewar on the subject of Arab-Israeli relations, but just imagine the impact if the U.S. gov't did this! I'd start getting .sxc as attachments instead of .doc! Then, the economically challenged could buy a cheap PC, or get one used from a church or something, and immediately make it more useful!

    --

    You are not the customer.

    1. Re:Fantastic! by AKAImBatman · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was a simple format document so the moral of the story is... You still need to SAVE AS RTF!!!!

      Or state that the file is in OpenOffice format. Mailing documents to people without telling them what to use is somewhat rude, even if it is a common document. There are plenty of people out there who don't have ANY Office software, and/or even know what a ZIP file is.

      Get in the habit. A simple "Here's your document is OpenOffice format" goes a lot farther than "Here's your document."

    2. Re:Fantastic! by Micah · · Score: 2, Informative

      .sxc is the OOo spreadsheet extension.

    3. Re:Fantastic! by Wah · · Score: 2, Informative

      They (CFY) use Windows, as do we. [click 'home computers'] For us, this was purely a pragmatic decision, as there is some training on Microsoft OS's at school and it really would be a bit much to dump Linux on someone who is barely PC literate (not to mention the SAT prep software that has been donated to us is also Windows only). Yes, this does make the OS more espensive (by a factor of at least 2) than the hardware it runs on, but Microsoft does offer non-profit licensing options which we are currently working through the process to obtain (along with official 501(c)(3) statues (it takes at least 120 days, we're about a month in)).

      --
      +&x
    4. Re:Fantastic! by cshark · · Score: 2, Informative

      I think it's great!
      But the Israeli's have always been ahead of the curve technologically. I could be wrong, but wearen't they evaluating openoffice as part of a plan to migrate to Linux?

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    5. Re:Fantastic! by jroysdon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Gas-guzzling autos and tobacco products are also a big part of certain segments of our population's economy.

      I don't think either are acceptable and all need to move to another line of work, and/or adapt. Just because something lines our pocketbooks doesn't mean we should promote or endorse it.

      Just offhand (as my son and I were watching C.S. Lewis' _Voyage of the Dawn Treder_ last night), I believe slavery was a big money maker, and illicit drugs still are. Of course, many ways of handling the last, but my point was that just because something makes a lot of money, doesn't mean it should remain or be propped up as some sacred cow.

      Speaking of sacred cows and money... oh, wait, that's another story.

    6. Re:Fantastic! by Wah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Can an economist answer this one?

      Which is a better scenario...

      A) Where everyone has in the country pays $100 for software, generating a $30,000,000,000/yr industry.

      B) Everyone in the country gets $100 worth of software for free, destroying a $30,000,000,000 industry.

      Is it just the change from one to another that is the problem? Or is there some hidden danger from everyone on the planet being born with 'rights' to software that used to cost $1,000 a seat?

      I mean, sheesh, that's like $6,000,000,000,000 added to the global economy overnight. For 'free'.

      --
      +&x
    7. Re:Fantastic! by Wah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I realize that just fine. It's not a doom and gloom scenario, just a very strange one. Something of immense dollar value is replaced by something of no dollar value. The value to society is still provided (the service of the software) and the money can and will move to another place, but the outlook for an economy might not be so rosy, even to the extreme that it could cause a strange panic and real damage.

      So I'm curous how such things would look to an economist.

      --
      +&x
    8. Re:Fantastic! by budgenator · · Score: 2, Interesting
      wearen't they evaluating openoffice as part of a plan to migrate to Linux?
      that's the impression I got;
      The ministry is aware that despite the substantial savings accrued by not buying Microsoft licenses, there would also be considerable installment costs.
      my experience is OO for Win32 is an equivalent install to any other Win32 software. Additionaly
      the Account General supreme inter-ministerial tenders committee had instructed IT managers at government ministries to buy PCs without Microsoft operating licenses from January 2004.
      implies that Linux will probably be installed on all new Isreali PC's
      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    9. Re:Fantastic! by bnenning · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Something of immense dollar value is replaced by something of no dollar value. The value to society is still provided (the service of the software) and the money can and will move to another place, but the outlook for an economy might not be so rosy


      Short term, maybe. Long term, it's absolutely a good thing. Each consumer who would otherwise have paid $100 for the software instead uses it on her next preferred alternative, which she otherwise wouldn't have been able to obtain, so clearly she's better off. The argument might then be that software publishers and their employees suffer, but this is at most a temporary effect. Demand for (paid) software will decrease, but demand for other goods will increase (because of the extra $100 that consumers have to spend), so production and jobs are just being reallocated, not lost.


      Similarly, the discovery of a cheap, clean, abundant, and renewable energy source would be great for the world's economy, despite the problems it might cause for oil companies and others.

      --
      How to solve most of our problems: 1.Lots of nuclear plants. 2.Cure aging.
    10. Re:Fantastic! by openmtl · · Score: 2, Insightful
      In one phrase - only Final Goods contribute to Gross domestic product.

      Software generally are intermediate goods - it doesn't add to the GDP of a country (or globally) no matter what Microsoft say. No work has been done when an item valued at $100 is given away. Thought the scenario a) seems to show a $30 billion industry in fact all that has done is remove nearly $30 billion from the money supply because Microsoft charge a lot more than they ever pay their programmers or even shareholders. The rest sits in the bank in cash doing nothing. In scenario b) though MS may say that they gave away $30 billion of software in fact they have given away nothing of any value as no money has actually been exchanged. That $100 per person thats not being given to Microsoft will end up being used more usefully in other ways.

      You can also reduce this to a view that value is only added when you add human labour. Taking some bunch of EXE/DLLs and adding a $100 price to it doesn't instantly create a $30 billion industry whereas if $100 was paid directly to 500,000 programmers 600 times over then you could argue that you have a $30 billion industry.

      Fact remains that if I download Linux and pay my $100 for the books/manuals or an extra hard disk then more value have been added to the economy than if I simply paid $100 to MS. Thus spending money on Open Source software contributes a lot more to the GDP than if its used on packaged products.

      --

  3. Distributed by CDR Copies by H8X55 · · Score: 5, Funny

    'in a bid to reduce the technological gap between the rich and poor in Israel'.

    And in a similar move City Officials in Hong Kong announced plans to widely distribute illegal CD-R cracked copies of Micrsoft Office 2003.

    oh yeah, wait, that's already being done without a government sanction.

    1. Re:Distributed by CDR Copies by pergamon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, it's possible that is being done with government sanction. I once spoke with a high-up Microsoft exec who said that at that time (mid 90s), the Chinese government was their chief concern as far as piracy goes. According to him, they went all out by even copying the holograms on the license certs.

  4. Is free cheap enough? by mikeophile · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Will Bill now start paying the Israeli government to use Microsoft products?

    1. Re:Is free cheap enough? by artemis67 · · Score: 5, Funny

      No, but he is expected to meet with Yassir Arafat to discuss how he can fund the Microsoft intifada.

  5. Two questions. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Is it true that there is no Hebrew localized version of Office? I can see that being a primary reason for the distribution.

    If there is a Hebrew localization of Office, what is to stop a zillion people from pirating it? (like everywhere else)

    1. Re:Two questions. by nehril · · Score: 4, Informative

      if i recall correctly, the problem was the Mac version of Office not providing Hebrew support. OS X provides quite rich hebrew support in their libraries, so the technical barriers to a Hebrew Mac Office were perceived to be quite low, nobody is sure why MS wouldn't do it. There were no plans for adding it either. The Israeli government offered to pay for programmer time to add support but MS still refused.

      This is where the Office monopoly started to look sour, it looked like MS was not going to do a Hebrew Mac Office "just because. Buy Windows." This demonstrated the effects of monopoly lock in and led to the search for alternatives.

    2. Re:Two questions. by sigxcpu · · Score: 2, Informative

      M$ has a big ad thingy in Israel about "copy software - go to jail".

      Which is a lie, since Israeli copyright law dos not hold for private, none-profit use.
      If you want protection from that, you have to sell your program as a product, not as a "creation".
      But then you can't sell it without a decent warenty ...

      So It appears that the ad strategy has backfired.

      --
      As of Postgres v6.2, time travel is no longer supported.
    3. Re:Two questions. by Branka96 · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was Apple who did not provide support for Hebrew and Arabic and a lot of other languages in OS X 10.0. The first version of Office for OS X targeted OS X 10.1 which did not have support for Hebrew and Arabic. 10.1 was released 9/25/2001. Office X was released 11/19/2001. It wasn't before Apple release OS X 10.2 (8/26/2002) that the OS had support for Hebrew and Arabic. There is no reason to believe this is more than an engineering decision. Delay support for a feature until the OS supports it. I would be surprised if the next version of Office for the Mac does not support Hebrew and Arabic. Yes, I know it is fun to blame Microsoft for everything. However in this case, if you want to blame anyone, it should be Apple.

  6. Installation Costs? by VivianC · · Score: 4, Interesting

    From the Article:
    The ministry is aware that despite the substantial savings accrued by not buying Microsoft licenses, there would also be considerable installment costs.

    I have installed Open Office, Star Office, Word Perfect Office and Microsoft Office for various clients over the past two years. Maybe I'm missing something about a large scale deploy, but they all seem about the same for installation. I can even use SMS to drop the package automatically. Any idea what they are talking about?

    --
    Viv

    Gmail invites for ip
    1. Re:Installation Costs? by GMontag · · Score: 2, Insightful

      He may be referring to hidden costs like having to learn the quirks of the way it works, i.e., the differences between it and MS Office.

      Also, he may be thinking that someone has to go to each desktop rather than letting the users install.

      All of that is just guessing and I have not used Open Office yet.

    2. Re:Installation Costs? by carn1fex · · Score: 2, Informative

      theyre most likely bundling training, data-base switches, and maybe full linux installation into 'installment'.

      --

      ---------

      No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.

    3. Re:Installation Costs? by pigpilot · · Score: 5, Informative

      When we moved our administration/secretarial staff onto OpenOffice it took about half an hour per worker to get them familiar with the basic differences. It also degraded productivity significantly for a couple of days as each worker got used to the different ways of doing things.

      Many of these more experienced users also used some Macros and links to Access databases which entailed some time and effort to work around.

      The process was quicker for workers with less experience with MS Office, but then those users were much less productive when it comes to word-processing etc. so it was difficult to tell if they were having any additional problems with OpenOffice.

      Our move entailed a half an hours workplace training, which meant half an hours of the trainers time and half an hour of the admin worker's time, plus an unquantified loss of efficiency for a couple of days.

      On our salary scales it would come to a minimum cost of 10 pounds per worker, although with loss of productivity it could easily be 50 pounds depending on how slow the worker was to adapt. If you scale these kinds of costs up for thousands of users then you have a significant issue.

      We made the move in order to stop using unauthorised copies, so it was cheaper than going legit by buying the correct MS Licenses, but if the Isreali Government already has the correct Licenses then there may be minimal short term savings, indeed there is probably a significant short term cost to be justified.

    4. Re:Installation Costs? by good+soldier+svejk · · Score: 2, Funny

      If you have been using SMS to install and manage OO.org and StarOffice, our Windows desktop team would like to toalk to you. They seem to think this is a major hurdle.

      --
      It is cowardly, and a betrayal of whatever it means to be a Jew, to act as a white man

      -James Baldwin
  7. Re:My experience as a consultant for the Israelis by the_duke_of_hazzard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Check the weather story (below on the main page) out - a very opiniated response from the same user is on there, and the phrase "FINAL SOLUTION" pops up gratuitously there also...

  8. You're forgetting... by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 4, Informative
  9. You say this as if you prefer ms software by js3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    If Microsoft can focus on LOWER licensing costs and improved Jewish language support, things may change and the GATES of communication will once again

    the question is what does israel want? free software or good software. Do you want microsoft software instead but don't want it because it is too expensive? or do you don't want it because it doesnt meet your requirements? Also how does ms being a monopoly affect your decision since you easily switched to another software without suffering any effects from this monopoly you are so scared of

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
  10. Mac OS X 10.3 supports Hebrew by mkirsch · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to Mac OS X Hints Panther supports hebrew, arabic and farsi now.

  11. The technological gap is a wealth gap by js3 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    giving people free cds is like giving them free gasoline. it is almost useless to anyone without a car.

    --
    did you forget to take your meds?
    1. Re:The technological gap is a wealth gap by pavon · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So? Computer prices keep dropping while software prices have not.

      Right now, MS Windows + Office costs almost as much as computer does. Since an OS and office suite is pretty much required for a computer to be usefull, this is the same as giving them a $300 dollar discount on the computer, which lowers the barrier for entry significantly. In a few years, a computer will not be an economic burden for anyone living in a first world country.

      $500 Decent Computer
      $200 Decent Monitor

      $200 MS Windows XP Home Edition
      $300 MS Office 2003 Standard

  12. Consider The Source by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A lot of people will dismiss this as a "whoop-tee-doo" gesture and that would be an expected knee-jerk reaction. The thing here is that one must consider the source -- WHO is giving the stuff away. It's not the same as me burning a hundred OSS cd's and leaving them out for people to take. This is a GOVERNMENT entity doing this, and thus has more "umph" to it.

    This is most definitely a good thing.

  13. Well... by tuxette · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I already make the Norwegian government send me things in non-M$ format; it usually ends up in .pdf-format. They are required by law to do this for me. Mowahaha.

    --
    People say I'm crazy, I got diamonds on the soles of my shoes...
  14. Negotiation tactic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Ministry of Finance sources told Globes that the decision could be reversed if Microsoft Israel shows willingness to compromise on its pricing policy for tens of thousands of computer stations at government offices.

    Sounds to me like Isreal is just trying to force Microsoft into giving them a price break on Office.

  15. Misleading name? by Wumpus · · Score: 4, Informative

    Israel National News, or Arutz Sheva (Channel 7) as it's more commonly known, is a heavily right wing biased media outlet whose management was recently sentenced to various prison terms for operating an illegal radio station.

    More details here

    It's an odd source for tech news.

    1. Re:Misleading name? by Wumpus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because, contrary to the parent poster's assertion, Arutz 7 doesn't speak for the "majority voice of the people of Israel". Politically, it is in fact an extreme right wing organization, backed by right wing political parties and settlers' organizations. It's only a "majority" in the sense that the American Moral Majority is one.

      To present just one data point, opinion polls consistently show that the Israeli population overwhelmingly supports the formation of a Palestinian state (around a 60% majority), an idea which is abhorrent to Arutz 7 and its backers.

      Arutz 7's history is rife with controversy, from its announcers' miserable show of merriment when breaking the news of the massacre of 29 arabs in Hebron in 1994, to their infamous attacks on the late Israeli prime minister, Izhak Rabin, which were blamed as one of the factors that led to his assassination. To say that Arutz 7 was in any sense mainstream in its views is disingenuous.

      Why would they clamp down on right-wing stations?

      I would hardly describe allowing a pirate radio station to operate for over a decade as a clamp down. Left wing circles in Israel have repeatedly accused the government of complacency in their dealings with Arutz 7, and the amount of time it took to shut it down serves as evidence that they may have been right.

  16. Re:Priorities... by QuasiCoLtd · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is somewhat offtopic, but doesn't anyone think that Israel has bigger problems to deal with right now, instead of distributing OpenOffice.org CDs?


    Because God knows that if you have troubles with your neighbors you should Immediately cease any attempt at doing silly little things like bettering your information infrastructure or freeing up valuble resources that were previously going to a monopoly that was selling you software that you couldn't use properly.

  17. Just to get back on topic..... by digrieze · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Despite the anti-jewish trolls (someone mod these jerks down PLEASE, this is a TECH page!!!!). The decision Israel made points out both advantage and disadvantages of OS like OpenOffice.org.

    First, there are still compatibility issues. Although OpenOffice is a great office suite as is it still has problems converting from other formats. Therefore, even though it is free, government agencies that MUST access historical files in the original form do incur further expense in making an accurate file conversion.

    Second, when you have a government agency that requires certain forms to be filled out electronically you have to make sure that the people filling out those forms have access to the programs to do this. This problem is exacerbated by the first concern previously mentioned.

    Israel seems to have thought this through. That's why they're giving the disks away and also why they're biting the bullet and paying for properly converting the files (part of the installation process).

    If OS software is going to ever really make any imprint in the government or any other institution we're going to have to be honest. OS may be cheap, but nothings truly free.

    --
    It doesn't matter what you wrap your emotions around, Reality is a brick wall specifically designed to scramble eggs
  18. Threat or Real? by mcrbids · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this a threat to Microsoft? Or is this "for real"?

    If they actually distribute the CDs, is there a difference?

    I consider this a followup on this story at Linux Today about their threat to use Linux instead of MS-Windows.

    As such, we are definitely seeing the economics of competition and choice re-enter the marketplace, and no matter how you look at it, this is a GOOD THING.

    --
    I have no problem with your religion until you decide it's reason to deprive others of the truth.
  19. Re:How does this help the poor? by njdj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Don't most computer come with a rudimentary work processor and spreadsheet?

    OpenOffice is not a "rudimentary" word processor and spreadsheet. The "rudimentary" stuff you mention is intentionally inadequate for a lot of people.

    Can someone say 'I don't need MS Office so take that off my bill." I think we have already tried and failed to get MS to refund licensing costs.

    It's much easier to get a PC without paying for Office than to get a PC without paying for Windows.

    Is giving away copies of OOo going to reduce the cost of buying a computer so that it is affordable to everyone?

    Well, it sure makes a big difference. You can buy a PC for less than the price of MS Office these days. So eliminating MS Office from the package halves the price. I'd say that makes a computer affordable to a lot more people, wouldn't you?

  20. Re:Priorities... by operagost · · Score: 2, Informative

    Why is that? Because anti-Israeli nations will start pumping money into Palestine? The Arabs in Israel sure haven't proven to have the drive all by themselves. We've only seen progress since the creation of Israel in 1948. That's even with the Arabs attacking them every few years until the 1970's.

    --

    Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  21. yep by ed.han · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i used to do work w/ an israeli governmental entity who would send us large data files that were natively in hebrew. working for a financial services company at the time, i was obliged to find a translation service as we were using these files to populate a database. that particular entity was using office 97 hebrew edition to generate a large excel spreadsheet.

    several characters didn't get displayed properly on my english edition PC and i went back & forth w/ the translation service and the file creators, until we learned that the issue was the file creators were using win NT hebrew edition as well, which represents certain characters incorrectly when those characters are then displayed on an english edition box. i think i lost a week getting that file straightened out.

    ed

  22. Not just for Linux by Milo+Fungus · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The programs are for use on the Linux operating system, which is a free alternative to the Windows operating system.

    OpenOffice is a cross-platform suite. It's not just for Linux. I use the Windows version all the time.

    Free software for the win32 platform is (I think) an important front of the F/OSS movement. Most people are unwilling to take the plunge straight into Linux. Using free software on win32 is a way to wade in and test the waters before jumping in. The win32 port of The GIMP was the first thing that got me really excited about free software, and I have since migrated to more free and open source applications and operating systems. For those of you running windows who would like to check out some free software, follow the links below:

  23. Re:Correcting false historic claims. by lederhosen · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Can you come up with one example where the U.S. was not retaliating? Probably not

    You have no examples. One by one:

    IraqSaddam's army attacked US peacekeepers many times.
    Vietnam The US came to the aid of South Vietnam when the USSR invaded it.

    KoreaYou have the US confused with North Korea, obviously.

    AfganistanYou've obviously never heard of the 9/11 attack.

    Panama...where the US was invited by Panama's elected government. Next...

    Peru What year was this?



    Saddam's army attacked US troops, *not* peacekeepers.

    I *have* heard of the 9/11 attack, It
    was not Afganistan. It was a group of
    mostly Saudi people, not by a nation.

    US was not retaliating Panama.

    9/11 30 years ago. Ironic is it not?
  24. Bottom Line... by Chordonblue · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think the bottom line is, anytime an entire people are singled out as a 'problem', it's a problem.

    Amongst the people in charge there are no innocents, but among the poor everyday commoner who has no beef with anybody, it's a different story. As is always the case in situations like these - guess who suffers more?

    --
    "...Well, there's egg and bacon; egg sausage and bacon; egg and spam; egg bacon and spam; egg bacon sausage and spam..."
  25. Re:The Palestinians keep preventing this by babba · · Score: 2, Informative

    Both sides? There are only two sides? How about Iran, Syria, Saudi Arabia, Former Iraqi dictatorship, Egypt, or the terror-funding EU (who "need an investigation of where the funds go like they need a whole in the head")?

    There is no Israel-Palestinian conflict, it's just the media-friendly face to the same old Arab-Israeli conflict. Arabs refuse to recognize Israel's right to exist, and Israel refuses to cease to exist, a rather simple equation.

    And yes, Israel does have the right to claim the moral high ground, because mere days after Palestinians and Arabs joined in an attempted mass slaughter of her civilians, she responded with the most generous offer a victorious warring nation has ever produced - a return of the land for normalized relations - Arabs responded with their typical undying hatred of all things Jewish.

    "On June 19, 1967, scarcely ten days after the cease-fire, the Israeli government decided in a secret cabinet session to return all of the Sinai Peninsula, all of the Golan Heights, to Egypt and Syria respectively in return for full peace treaties. At the same time, the Israeli government launched a clandestine operation to canvass 80 Palestinian notables on the West Bank about the possibility of creating an autonomous Palestinian entity, leading potentially to an independent Palestinian state. The Egyptians and the Syrians rejected this overture. They convened at Khartoum at the end of the summer, and they passed the infamous Three No's: no negotiations, no peace, no recognition of Israel. The Palestinian notables in the West Bank, the protocols of the discussions, all said they'd be interested in having an autonomous entity. They certainly wanted independence. But they were afraid if they concluded any peace treaty at all with Israel, they'd be executed. A historic opportunity was lost that summer, and we've lived with the consequences ever since."

    - http://www.commonwealthclub.org/archive/02/02-06or en-qa.html

    If you're looking for a villain in the Middle East, start with the dictatorships and tyrannies that have ethnically cleansed Palestinians from Kuwait, refuse to give them basic citizenship rights in Lebanon, Syria, and Jordan (although Jordan is by far the best of that crew), refuse to allow Palestinians to immigrate (Saudi Arabia), and continue to fan the flames of hatred to perpetuate their proxy war against Israel. Find me a pro-Palestinian more concerned with the well-being of the Palestinian people rather than the desire to harm Israel in some way, shape, or form. I don't see all the apologists in Europe doing a damn thing to improve the living conditions of Palestinians in any Arab nations - a people forced to live in slum villages for the sole purpose of using their plight as a negotiating tool in their proxy war against Israel. I didn't hear a damn word when tens of thousands of Palestinians were ethnically cleansed from Kuwait, yet I heard plenty about it when somebody simply (and falsely) <b>accused</b> Israel of <b>considering</b> it.

    There is one party amongst all these people that has an open, liberal democracy that not only includes over 1 million Arab and Druze citizens (including an Arab member on the Supreme court), but also provides the highest standard of living for any Arab in the entire Middle East. Israel has made quite a few mistakes - bringing in a dictator from Tunisia at the urging of the U.S. government being the most egregious, but to try to equate the two sides while ignoring the funding and motivation from the Arab world is utterly puerile.

  26. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 2, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  27. Re:the violations by circusnews · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I have some good friends from Palestine who are very vocal about the issue. I have some good friends from Israel who are likewise very vocal about the issue. They are all very highly educated, very articulate, and very much believe in their perspective views. As such I have heard countless arguments on both sides over the years. I have seen numbers from both sides proving what they say, but in the end, they don't matter. You can make numbers say what ever you want them to - and both sides do. Both sides put out numbers showing how they were harmed, and how little they have harmed the other. These numbers are not stopping either side from killing the other, just encouraging it.

    Numbers like these lead to more donations to Palestine some of which buys more weapons. When Israel does its the same thing - more money to buy weapons. They don't lead to any solutions, only finger pointing, name-calling and more bloodshed.

    You know what angers me most? It's my own part in it. The majority of funding for this - both sides of this - comes from the USA. Until a few years ago I contributed to both sides in my charitable giving, and even worse, for a long time I did not take the time to understand the various points of view, and see my own part in it. So yes, I have blood on my hands as well. I often wonder what would happen if the money just stopped flowing.

    Before I get off my soapbox, can anyone tell me how much money Israel has spent caring for those Palestinians injured in their various attacks on Palestine? How about telling me how much money Palestine has spent caring for those injured in Israel by suicide Palestinian bombers?

    And we are surprised this keeps going on?

  28. Every word is a lie by shlaf · · Score: 2, Informative

    Palestine isn't a state occupied by anyone - it's a name of a former province of Roman Empire. There was never a state of Palestine. There's no brutal occupation either. What happens here is unprecedented war of terror against civilian population of Israel and you and those like you are denying the right of Israel to defend itself (by calling it "brutal occupation"). And that *is* racism.

  29. Re:GPL by trb · · Score: 3, Informative

    You may find unofficial translations of the GPL into Hebrew at law.co.il and guides.co.il.

  30. Try this experiment with SXC and SXW by DickBreath · · Score: 4, Informative

    Take an OpenOffice.org Writer file (SXW). Rename the file to have the extension SXC. (For OOo Calc -- the spreadsheet.)

    Now open it.

    It opens as a Writer document just fine.

    All OOo documents use the same XML structure. Based on some information in the META-INF directory, OOo is able to deduce that the top level of the document should open in Writer.

    What do I mean by all this META-INF nonsense? Try this experiment: take any OOo document and rename it's extension (from SXC, SXW, etc.) to ZIP. Now unzip it. You get a Content.xml file, a META-INF folder, and other goodies if your document contained embedded pictures, etc.

    --

    I'll see your senator, and I'll raise you two judges.
  31. Re:Stop the PC crap already! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Why is every criticism of the state of Israel (like the brutal occupation of Palestine) being labelled as racism?

    Because Arabs, Muslims, and the rest of the world didn't give a shit when Palestine was brutally occupied by Jordan and Egypt (holding the West Bank and Gaza Strip respectively).

    People didn't complain until the occupation was done by Jews.

    Same reason why nobody complains about Turkey's occupation of Cyprus or Syria's occupation of Lebanon. Muslims as the occupiers are acceptable in the UN and the rest of the world. Jews as occupiers is a violation of human rights.

    Conclusion - Jews are held to higher standards than Muslims. That's racism.

  32. Re:How does this help the poor? by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Yes, indeed, computers are cheaper than MS Office. I'm typing this on a 433 Celeron-based machine which I will probably be selling in the next few days for less than $100. It runs OpenOffice 1.1 just fine.

    As you say, there are lots of people out there with all sorts of software loaded on their machines. But much of it is illegal, so there are hidden costs. People lose respect for copyright laws. The laws themselves become more draconian, in order to crack down on widespread piracy. New players like OO.o are shut out of the market because there is an entire segment of the population where "free as in beer" confers no competitive advantage.

    In short, widespread piracy distorts copyright law and locks out competition. Despite the problems with copyright law, we do need it. If a "free as in legal" product can be had that has 90% of the functionality of MS Office, then it is irresponsible to use "closing the digital divide" as an excuse for encouraging piracy.

    Especially if half of the remaining 10% is Clippy.

    --

    You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

  33. Re:the violations by babba · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Israel has done quite a bit for the Palestinians, the reverse cannot be said for the Palestinians however. The bigger question is why Arab nations refuse to fund and aid in the creation of a peaceful Palestinian populace rather than funding the most extreme elements of Palestinian society (including a government that preaches hatred of Jews on all its government controlled media).

    For example, Israeli hospitals such as Hadassah, are known for taking in everybody regardless of religion or background, including terrorists. One surgeon recently blinded by a terrorist attack had in fact reattached the hand of a Palestinian bomb maker, only to be nearly killed by one later.

    It appears as though your gut reflex would be to give more aid, and it's an understandable instinct. The problem is, as numerous studies have shown, terrorism is perpetrated by middle class and upper class people by a far greater margin than those impoverished. Palestinians get the most aid per capita in the world according to the World Bank (no longer avail online, from a Jerusalem Post reprint of an Associated Press article dated Feb 19, 2003):

    However, "firm commitments" by donor countries meeting in London this week was only in the range of US$700 million, said Nigel Roberts, World Bank's representative to the West Bank and Gaza.

    He said US$1.1 billion would "maintain the very basic level of equilibrium in the economy."

    Donors disbursed US$930 million in 2001, and just over a billion dollars in 2002, Roberts said. "Given the trends, this very high level of foreign assistance is roughly US$300 per capita, which on a sustained basis is the highest in any country in the world, in a developing country situation," he told a news conference.


    The key is in the education - one that's currently under the control of a group of thugs sadly put in place by both my and Israel's governments.

    Your compassion is understandable and commendable, but ignoring the strategy behind terrorism will only lead to more of it. There's a wide political spectrum in Israel, don't you find it curious that it doesn't exist on the other side of the divide (usually because they're dragged out in the street and hung for their political views)?

    By the way, you have nowhere near as much blood on your hands as, say, the average European. At least our government officials don't secretly delight at the prospect of our funds going to the likes of Hamas, Islamic Jihad, and Al Aksa Martyrs Brigade. EU government officials hoping to prevent funds going to terrorist groups is a rare thing. As Chris Patten famously said, they'd want an investigation of where the funds were going like he'd like a hole in the head.