Slashdot Mirror


Mars Rovers At Smithsonian And Exploratorium Now

Illah Nourbakhsh writes "From the makers of the Palm Pilot Robot Kit comes our newest thing. If you live in SF or in DC you can go to the biggest science centers of them all, the Air & Space Museum or the Exploratorium and interact with miniature Mars rovers we've put in Mars yards there. The robots take panoramic images and track and test rocks, so it's no remote-control toy. All Linux on-board, using a prototype single-board arm-based robotics board (the Intel Stayton). The website 'gallery' has pictures of all of the rover's parts, including the Linux processor and the mechanicals. Gallery also has several videos. We've built 20 of these 'bots and they're in DC, San Francisco and Augusta, Georgia." If these were in toy stores ...

17 of 85 comments (clear)

  1. Obvious question..... by BWJones · · Score: 5, Funny

    So, I guess the obvious question is: Where can I buy one? Followed up by: Are you going to Open source it?

    --
    Visit Jonesblog and say hello.
    1. Re:Obvious question..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      You forgot to ask about OGG support.

      ~~~

    2. Re:Obvious question..... by lxs · · Score: 5, Funny

      No no no no no!
      The obvious question is:

      "Does SCO plan to send a probe to mars, carrying an invoice for $699?"

    3. Re:Obvious question..... by GreggBert · · Score: 2, Funny
      Why do I think that even if someone could buy one, that they would not stand a chance of having it arrive at home successfully ?

      Maybe we should put Fed-Ex in charge of delivering these things to Mars. I can hear the commercial now. "Fed-Ex...When it absolutely, positively needs to get there overnight. In one piece. Without exploding, vaporizing, bouncing off the atmosphere or being driven into the ground due to metric/standard conversion issues"

      --


      If you don't understand anything I post, please accept that I ate paste as a small boy...
  2. The real thing by Dan+East · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let's hope the actual landers make it safely to the surface of Mars, so these models don't end up being sad reminders of the science that could have been.

    Dan East

    --
    Better known as 318230.
  3. I've heard alot about these models by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've heard alot about these models, and they're supposed to be spactacular. Incredibly accurate. There's a great collection of interviews (audio) with project scientists available at http://www.planetary.org/audio/planetaryradio.html . Really worth a listen.

  4. Unfortunately by CrankyFool · · Score: 4, Funny

    I called the Exploratorium. They said they were _supposed_ to receive one of these, but so far it's late checking in, and they're losing hope it'll actually arrive.

  5. Rock tracking? by CompressedAir · · Score: 4, Funny

    The robots take panoramic images and track and test rocks,

    "Still there... yep, still there. The rock has not moved."

  6. Re:Oops... by cybermace5 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Yeah, 1999, along with closing my bolding tag.

    --
    ...
  7. Control your own rover! by Naomi_the_butterfly · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, this is real. You can actually control your own rover through the web, and see live images. These aren't replica's, but made of lego's to drum up interest in the "Red Rover Goes to Mars" bit sponsored by The Planetary Society, a group over 20 years old that advocates space exploration and planetary science, founded (in part) by the great Carl Sagan.
    Go to http://www.redrovergoestomars.org/Rrsites.php and control your own rover!

  8. Shouldn't It Be More Realistic by cptofmysoul · · Score: 2, Funny

    I think they should capture more realism by just advertising the Mars Explorer models. Then, when all the kids come to play with them, they would just have the empty display. Maybe the control panel could display, "SEARCHING FOR SIGNAL...". Does anyone else think that the problems with getting something on Mars kinda gives validity to the whole "we didn't really land on the moon" conspiracy theory?

  9. Tech Museum in San Jose too by G4from128k · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Tech museum in San Jose had an exhibit like this (about 3 years ago?). They had a little rover model running around in a simulated Martian crater. Visitors could control the rover remotely through a closed circuit TV and joystick setup. It was quite fun.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  10. Re:Cerebellum board by x4A6D74 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I've worked with the Cerebellum. I TA'd for a summer program at CMU for high school students who are strong in compsci/math. Part of the curriculum was building robots out of Lexan, hobby servos (with Lego wheels, 'cause they were conveniently around when the instructor moved away from Mindstorms), and these boards.

    They have a PIC 16F877 controller driving 8 digital tristate I/O lines, and 8 analog lines (which I think were just input, IIRC). So we plugged the modified servos in as motors, and for sensors had switches, photoresistors, and an infrared rangefinder. The students were able to code in a somewhat-limited subset of C (due to the freeware compiler we had -- there was a better one available, but the instructor couldn't get funding for it) and compile it down, then transfer to the board (via a built-in serial port). It worked well for those applications, though with only a couple K of memory. In fact, I ended up writing a prettied-up API for the students, because the instructor decided he wasn't all that pleased with some of the low-level, non-intuitive calls (which would be trouble for those students who'd never coded before, let alone in C).

    More info here on robotics at Leap: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~roboleap/

    The Cerebellum was conveniently easy for this level, but I'm surprised they're using it for these rovers. I didn't think you could get Linux that small!

  11. How unusual that there is one at the Smithsonian.. by andy666 · · Score: 2, Funny

    Mars probes are usual debris strewn across the surface of the red planet.

  12. Houston Space Center, as well by JWhitlock · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The Tech museum in San Jose had an exhibit like this (about 3 years ago?). They had a little rover model running around in a simulated Martian crater. Visitors could control the rover remotely through a closed circuit TV and joystick setup. It was quite fun.

    I think this is a new, autonomous exhibit, not the remote control ones from other museums.

    The Houston Space Center has the remote control one, which me and the wife visited when we were on a pilgramage to Ikea (damn your fashionable and reasonably priced Nordic furniture! Why won't you build a store more than 50 miles from a port!).

    I played with the joystick part, which allowed two rovers to compete to roll a ball into a goal. It was a somewhat low-res screen, and I thought it was a computer game ("why did they bother with 3D models if they were only going to show a nearly top-down view?"). It was only later that I saw the real models, and realized that I was remote controlling the robots. It was a very strange feeling, like realizing that something you read about in a Sci-Fi book has suddenly come to life.

    If you go to the Houston Space Center, try to find one of the many discounts to get in. My Southwest Airlines frequent flyer card got me in cheaply, even though I drove to Houston.

  13. Rovers ARE at the Exploratorium by ronhip · · Score: 3, Informative

    The robots ARE at the Exploratorium and are working great thanks to the fine folks at CMU. The "personal" rovers will go on display this weekend coinciding with our webcasts. See http://www.exploratorium.edu/mars for details.

  14. Finally, something usable on earth by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Funny

    NASA finally has made a practical technology: Remote Up-skirt viewers

    "Honest officer, the probe thought it was on another planet."