Slashdot Mirror


The Golden Transcendence

Argyle writes "I recently finished reading The Golden Transcendence by John C. Wright. A great novel that serious science fiction readers should pick up. The Golden Transcendence is the third book in The Golden Age trilogy. The first two books were The Golden Age and The Phoenix Exultant." Read on to see if this series might be for you; if so, you're just in time, because author John C. Wright (a retired attorney) is working on the next book, Orphans of Chaos. The Golden Transcendence : Or, The Last of the Masquerade author John C. Wright pages 350 publisher Tor Books rating Excellent reviewer Michael Pusateri ISBN 0765307561 summary Can the determination of an individual change the entire society?

The books are firmly in the space opera genre with a dash of Heinlein libertarianism tossed in for good measure. The story takes place in the far future when artificial intelligences (known as sophotechs) and humans live immortal lives in a libertarian society of near unlimited technology. The experience of real physical interaction is replaced in many cases by remote bodies, recorded experiences of others, and complete control of what a person perceives. Humanity has moved beyond the one body - one brain system and has adopted many different systems of thought and even physical form

Mr. Wright puts forth a brilliant vision of technology and society in the far future where wealth is measured in seconds of computer time and physical labor is non-existent. In this future, there is are still wealthy and poor people but in a different way. In a good interview, Mr. Wright explains:

There would still be rich and poor, even if the poorest of the poor were absurdly well off by our standards. No advancements can eliminate differences in the abilities of men, or the differences in how men value the abilities of their fellow man (which is what causes inequality of prices and hence of incomes). If only by comparison, there will be poverty, even in Arcadia. My characters Ironjoy, Oshenkyo, and the Afloats [...] are meant to represent this idea of future poverty; the Seven Peers represent wealth.

As an example as just one of the concepts presented, we can look at the idea of 'sensefilters.' Perception is no longer what organic senses directly tell the mind. The signals received by the body or remote bodies are processed to be acceptable to the person's particular preferences. If a person doesn't like to see advertising, their mind eliminates the advertising from their vision and fills in the scene with what would be there if the advertisement wasn't there. Consciously, the person isn't aware of this, only that they have requested not to see advertisements. Sensefiltering can be used to remove (or add) objects, people, and even ideas from an individual's perception. The plot devices are interesting stuff that Mr. Wright explores in just enough detail to keep you wanting more throughout the trilogy.

The protagonist, Phaethon, is the son of one of the most important people in the society (known as the Golden Oecumene). In the first two books, Phaethon struggles against first the realization that he is missing parts of his memory, his struggle against society, his fall into exile, and his return to strength.

The third book finds Phaethon poised to fight against the true enemy that has been revealed to him. Without spoiling too much, Phaethon is forced to fight for the very survival of his society (which tossed him out) or allow it to be destroyed.

The author, John C. Wright, obviously has a libertarian heart and embodies the attributes of individuality, resourcefulness, ingenuity and desire for progress in Phaethon, the hero. In the opening novel, we find a society content with things how they are, willing to simply stop progress to prevent anything from changing their utopia in any meaningful way. Phaethon is a man of action in opposition to the statist Golden Oecumene. The underlying theme is that without mankind's strive for exploration and new goals, it is doomed.

Overall, an excellent book and series for the science fiction reader looking for something more than blasters and evil six-legged aliens. Getting used to the terminology and concepts is slow at first but well worth the effort.

Final note: If you enjoy Iain Banks's Culture series, Peter Hamilton's Night's Dawn, or John Varley's Eight Worlds, you will enjoy the The Golden Transcendence and the entire Golden Age Trilogy.

You can purchase The Golden Transcendence from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

43 of 172 comments (clear)

  1. Anti-spam? by blat.info · · Score: 5, Interesting

    As an example as just one of the concepts presented, we can look at the idea of 'sensefilters.' Perception is no longer what organic senses directly tell the mind. The signals received by the body or remote bodies are processed to be acceptable to the person's particular preferences. If a person doesn't like to see advertising, their mind eliminates the advertising from their vision and fills in the scene with what would be there if the advertisement wasn't there. Consciously, the person isn't aware of this, only that they have requested not to see advertisements. Sensefiltering can be used to remove (or add) objects, people, and even ideas from an individual's perception. The plot devices are interesting stuff that Mr. Wright explores in just enough detail to keep you wanting more throughout the trilogy (see other review).

    1. Re:Anti-spam? by Wintensis · · Score: 5, Insightful



      I think this has the potential to take things WAY to far.

      One could argue that if one has one's 'filters' set to high, one can end up screening out anything NEW. New experiences are what keeps the mind growing. So - I have visions of hordes of drones soaked in a safe, porn-tinted perceptual cocoon.

      Not saying that the idea doesn't have merit, but I think it can be abused.

      I'd say... go for a 5% 'totally random material' bypass ;)

    2. Re:Anti-spam? by maliabu · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the 'sensefilters' probably won't work in real life. it only filters things out visually, but not physically .

      this means you're still paying for the bandwidth taken to download advertising, the people you don't like to meet will still be there, probably slapping and kicking you invisibly.

      filtering ads on TV will show you what would be there if the ads wasn't there - ie nothing.

    3. Re:Anti-spam? by Wintensis · · Score: 2, Interesting



      hmm... now, I don't know what to do about 'invisible assailants' (that make me chuckle, btw) or paying for bandwidth by ads that I don't ever see, but finding a replacement for things that are blocked out shouldn't be a problem: I'll use the time/perceptual space to view my collection of por... classical art - much like I have on my screen-saver, or wallpaper.

      Heck - I can even see a new art form growing up around that. Subscribe to 'Ad-ventures', the new series of 15-second serial story vinettes, shown to you in place of commercial advertising! Why follow just one story when you can follow two?!

    4. Re:Anti-spam? by Malacca · · Score: 3, Informative

      In the book, 'sensefilters' can be used by both 'persons' with meat bodies as well as completely incorporeal uploaded 'persons'.

      In the latter case, for the person involved, both the 'visual' and 'physical' are filterable. It is only for 'persons' with meat bodies that one could be slapped and kicked invisibly. One of the taboos in the Golden Oecumene is acting contrary to the sense-filtered worldview of others.

    5. Re:Anti-spam? by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Funny

      One could argue that if one has one's 'filters' set to high, one can end up screening out anything NEW. New experiences are what keeps the mind growing. So - I have visions of hordes of drones soaked in a safe, porn-tinted perceptual cocoon. Not saying that the idea doesn't have merit, but I think it can be abused.

      Well, considering most content seems to be created like This, it's no wonder we need content filters.

      --
      I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.
    6. Re:Anti-spam? by Malacca · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC, there are AI routines that operate below the conscious level to consensualise the 'sensefiltered' environments. Trust the machines; the machines are your friend.

      One of the issues covered is the disadvantage of having one's perception modified like this. It's a blindspot that can be exploited. So, I could e.g take myself out of the 'sensefiltered' environment, and see things as they really are. In this case, there would be nothing to tell me what is and isn't acceptable to people around me.

  2. Science Fiction? by digital_milo · · Score: 5, Funny

    More like 'Math' Fiction.

    I love how some trilogies have at least 4 parts.

  3. single book please.. by viniosity · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I really enjoy both Sci-Fi and Fantasy, but what I wouldn't give for a novel that just ended without dragging me into 3 or more books. I just don't have time to read 3 in a row and I don't have patience to wait for them to keep coming out. (I am aware I'm being picky here)

    I know that the authors have investigated serious time in creating their world, but I'm not proposing never using the world again.. just give the particular character and plot a rest. Outside of the franchises (Dragonlance, Forgotten Realms, Star Trek) that pump out more than I want to keep track of, I don't see much.

    The last good one I read: Tigana

    The last bad one I read: Wheel of Time Series (OMG-will it EVER end?)

    1. Re:single book please.. by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just don't have time to read 3 in a row and I don't have patience to wait for them to keep coming out.

      I have a rule that I don't start reading a series of books until it's done. I want to know that there is an ending. But, sadly, I did get sucked into the Harry Potter series, now I live in terror that JKR will get hit by a bus before she finishes. Or worse, what must be tempting in her position, she takes the money and runs away from the pressure of it all.

      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    2. Re:single book please.. by hoggoth · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > sounds like we have to suffer through at least two more.

      Um.... no you don't.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
    3. Re:single book please.. by skia · · Score: 4, Interesting

      As I recall, the Golden Age was written as one book. It was the publisher's will that it be split into three novels, perhaps in part because this was Wright's first book, and in part because it's incredibly dense reading.

      But you may be in luck. I recall hearing rumors that the three books will be combined into one volume in the near future.

      As to the Wheel of Time, there is no comparison to be made between Wright's series and that monstrosity. For one thing, The Golden Age is complete now. You can go and read the whole thing from end to end right now should you choose. For another, Wright wisely decided to finish his series before penning prequels!

      --

      --

    4. Re:single book please.. by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I really enjoy both Sci-Fi and Fantasy, but what I wouldn't give for a novel that just ended without dragging me into 3 or more books. I just don't have time to read 3 in a row and I don't have patience to wait for them to keep coming out.

      Translation: You want to read a novel that's contained within one book. A LOT of novelists (especially in the franchises) forget that LOTR was three books because it was so long--not because three volumes really helps the story. (Though, again, a lot of the second-tier francise stories are single-volume contained...)

      A good one-volume fantasy I got for Xmas was Song of the Beast by Carol Berg. Nicely done. (Her premiere work, a trilogy, while good and modestly self-contained, is really a long story that should be read together, and not what you want.)

      Of course, my own work (see homepage) will be as standalone as I can get them. Definitly not as serial as Wheel of Time has gotten.

    5. Re:single book please.. by Coz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Modern authors need to re-read their Strunk & White.

      I believe it was Twain who said that as a starting point, an author should take every occurrence of the word "very" and change it to "damn" - since the editors of the day would promptly remove it, thereby improving the overall quality of the writer's work.

      Strict Strunk & White makes for fairly flavorless text - but a good story can still fight its way through.

      --
      I love vegetarians - some of my favorite foods are vegetarians.
    6. Re:single book please.. by Malacca · · Score: 3, Informative

      "The Golden Age" was very much worth the effort and for me is a stand-out book of recent vintage. I was however very frustrated when nearing the end of the first book, realising that there was no way Wright could tie up all the loose ends in the few pages remaining. I didn't know it was a trilogy. Nothing on the blurb suggested that it wasn't a stand-alone. Only on the last page of the first book was there a line about the story continuing in 'Phoenix Exultant'.

      Now I don't mind reading long series if they're good, but I thought it misleading of the publishers not to inform the reader. I expected (perhaps naively) that it was a stand-alone novel. That it wasn't was frustrating; "You mean I'll have to wait another few years to read the end of the story!"

    7. Re:single book please.. by hoggoth · · Score: 4, Funny

      > I still watch Enterprise, too, hoping against hope that there might be a diamond in the rough.

      Well, you got me there. I'm still watching Enterprise also, hoping one day for this:

      A hologram wavers into place in Archer's cabin.
      Archer: Daniels, it that you?
      Al: Sam, it's me. Sorry it took so long. Ziggy finally figured out why you are wasting your acting talents on this terrible show. You are supposed to rescue the only decent actor on the show, John Billingsley, from destroying his career.

      --
      - For the complete works of Shakespeare: cat /dev/random (may take some time)
  4. Slightly OT; sci fi in general by Theatetus · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've never liked science fiction but all my friends do. Most of the books I've read seem to just be about the technology, races and languages the author has imagined rather than using those as a medium for telling a compelling story; the tail wags the dog.

    I like Ray Bradbury, but all my sci-fi-fan friends say that's not "real" science fiction. So can anybody think of a "real" science fiction author that isn't

    • Pretentious
    • Focused on the stuff the author made up, and/or
    • Trying to make up for its bad writing by making some grand political or theological "statement"?

    I'd like to get in to sci fi because it seems like an interesting genre in principle, but I can't seem to find any authors other than Bradbury who care about writing a good book or story. Any ideas?

    --
    All's true that is mistrusted
    1. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by Ironsides · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ray Bradbury was "real" Science Fiction at the time. Today, like most of Jules Vern, it has become the past. If you want examples of hard Science Fiction(Deffinition, Take today, advance technology one step, see what happens), try "Kim Stanley Robinsons" Red Mars, Blue Mars, Green Mars Trilogy. Also try Robert A. Heinlen and James P. Hogan. They usually stick to hard SF as well. Most of the books you see in the Science Fiction section are borderline Fantassy. Super Science (Star Trek and the like) are either very soft SF or Fantassy.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by CGP314 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I too, try to like science fiction, but vastly more often than not, I'm dissapointed. The only author I like consistantly is Greg Egan.

      I think that sci-fi novels are the male equivalent of romance novels. They even have the same style cheesy covers.

      --
      In London? Need a Physics Tutor?

      American Weblog in London

    3. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Off the top of my head...

      Dune
      2001
      The Man Who Folded Himself
      The Demolished Man
      A Deepness in the Sky
      Ubik (and/or) Valis
      Tales of Known Space / The Smoke Ring / Ringworld
      Hyperion novels (4 of them?)
      Ender's Game

      uhh that's it for now...

      wait a minute. is this a troll?

    4. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by rkhalloran · · Score: 4, Interesting
      The problem most SF fans have with Bradbury is his generally pessimistic tone; we/they expect the genre to be basically the opposite, given it presumes we've made it to the future and expanded into space.


      That said, the Peter Hamilton and George R.R. Martin books mentioned above are good, and you might also want to look into David Brin's work.

    5. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by CodeSong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try Iain M. Banks. It Culture series is well known and I've found it very entertaining reading with well fleshed out characters and good storyline

      Or try Orson Scott Card's 'Ender's Game' and the companion 'Shadow' series (Ender's shadow, Shadow of the Hegemon and Shadow Puppets) All of Card's books tend to focus more on his characters and storyline than on science. He's also written a lot of fantasy, so you might want to check that out. You can read the first chapter of some (all?) of his books on his website.

      Anyway, there are tons of good books out there. Just sample here and there and you're bound to find something that suits your taste. And bluntly speaking, there is no such thing as real SF, just different "subgenres". If you find an author whose books you like, to h*ll with your friends and enjoy yourself :-)

      CodeSong

    6. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by mathin · · Score: 2

      I would argue that Ray Bradbury IS real sci-fi ... but that aside, you might try these authors:

      Frank Herbert: His Dune and Jesus Incident series are both very well written. Some of his earlier work isn't as polished, but those two series are great. (They do make some political statements, but the writting is good.)

      Kim Stanley Robinson: The Red/Green/Blue Mars series, Icehenge, Antarctica (set just a bit in the future on Earth ... really doesn't have much of the 'traditional' sci-fi elements, but does have some tech that doesn't exist now.)

      Dan Simmons: His 'Hyperion' series has some great stories within it (and on the whole is a good read too.)

      Well, that ought to get you started anyway.

    7. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by queequeg1 · · Score: 2

      Stephen Baxter's Manifold group of books (I believe three in all) is good hard sci-fi. Generally, they all involve fairly sweeping concepts about the progress of mankind and the evolution of the universe over billions of years. Essentially, he comes up with some story to wrap around various theories about how the universe works. For the most part, these stories work (aren't so hokey that they distract from the science). Sometimes, however, his stories (especially when they relate to contemporary US society and politics) are distracting.

    8. Re:Slightly OT; sci fi in general by my02wrxsti · · Score: 2, Informative

      David Brin. I believe David Brin to be one of the best hard science fiction authors writing today. Stong, complicated stories, engaging characters, set against backdrops of highly imaginative projections of our universe. About the only novel that could have been better put together would be "The Postman" which I have not been able to read more than once. His Uplift series is particularly brilliant. Richard.

  5. Huxley meets Heinlein meets Neo by southpolesammy · · Score: 4, Funny

    "The Brave New Moon is a Harsh Matrix..."

    or something like that....

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  6. What happened to standalone books? by MarcoAtWork · · Score: 3, Interesting

    nowadays it seems most writers embark on these loooooong series (that usually start blowing by the 3rd book), I know it's easier to just continue regurgitating the same stuff, but come on, show some originality!

    Notable example was the Erikson fantasy series (Malazan book of the fallen) which had a great 1st, good 2nd, ok 3rd and IMHO bad 4th (House of Chains IIRC) book. Notable exception to the rule is Martin's series that's still going strong (dying to read A Feast for Crows)

    For people looking for some good standalone sci-fi books look no further than John Varley, one of my favorite authors.

    --
    -- the cake is a lie
    1. Re:What happened to standalone books? by Richard_at_work · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I agree. Recently I found Alastair Reynolds, and read three of his books (Revelation Space, Redemption Ark and Chasm City) two of which are the first of a trilogy.

      I raved about this bloke and the series to everyone who would listen. And then his third book in the series came out. What a waste of money!!

      The whole series is leading up to a massive climax which jsut never comes, the entire storyline is wrapped up in the epilogue after the end of the third book, which jsut seemed to be a secondary arc that got pulled to the front. If i could get my money back for it, I would (its hard back, nearly 15!). It blowed, seriously. The ending had the feel that the author had jsut given up writing it one day (it was 700 pages long at that point) and ended it. I was severely dissappointed.

  7. Comfort Food Re:What happened to standalone books? by StefanJ · · Score: 4, Insightful

    People read books for different reasons.

    Sprawling SF or F series fill a need that many people feel. They want a comfortable place to escape to. Fictional comfort food.

    These are steady sellers, and some publishers favor them. Dedicated readers will keep buying them, out of a sense of loyalty or completeness, and forgive the occasional "dud."

    Different strokes for different folks.

  8. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN! Stole my comment!! by viniosity · · Score: 3, Informative

    Funny, but I don't remember plagerizing anything. In fact, the only thing I remember was typing the comment using my nifty PBG4. Shame on you for accusing me. Instead you should be brave enough to show your face and accept that somebody has a similar opinion.

  9. Roots of Poverty by JohnsonJohnson · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Libertarian myth that people will arrive at their appropriate station in life due to their own merits always amuses me. It becomes positively hilarious when you actually talk to them and realize they live in Lake Wobegon: where all the children are above average.

    Regardless of ability, poverty will result simply as a result of random chance. As long as there is an independent probability of a negative result there will be winners and losers, regardless of ability. In a large enough population there will be people who lose most of the time, through no fault of their own. They will be relatively poor then, but it has nothing to do with their personal ability.

    As a quick example, two investors mine some resource that's only available near fault lines. An earthquake comes, one investor's mine collapses and they are destitute. With the market all to themselves now the other is even wealthier than they would have been if the earthquake hadn't hit. They of course will write, or more precisely have someone ghost write, an autobiography lauding them as a business genius.

    1. Re:Roots of Poverty by Slider451 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I think you're trying to make it too complex. Circumstance (economic depression, natural disasters, etc.) certainly affects opportunity. But the poverty of third world nations doesn't disprove the concept of merit-based success.

      All else being equal (which is the environment portrayed in most Sci-Fi novels) people do go as far as their desires and talents will take them. Janitors are cheap because nearly everyone can be a competent janitor. Network architects are not cheap because their skills are rare. Supply and demand. Simple.

      Your example of the miners shows that one must take risks to get greater rewards. But failure rarely results in lifelong poverty. For someone willing to take the risks, failure is just a temporary stop on the journey upward.

      --
      Nostalgia isn't what it used to be.
    2. Re:Roots of Poverty by JohnsonJohnson · · Score: 2, Informative

      So then you prefer the Liberal myth that one can only achieve success by suckling at the taxpayer teat?

      No, I prefer the myth that I am the chosen one; specially favored among all creation.

      An irrelevant and unrealistic example. That implies that the investors have no other investments besides the risky one to choose from.

      For all the posters who take analogies too literally, a little research would probably have clued you in that I was referring to recent results in economics and finance which indicate that individual ability is not the only driving factor in wealth distributions, more info here. I am not arguing against personal responsibility or merit, merely pointing out that there are financial forces as inevitable as the curvature of spacetime which shape the course of events as well. The upshot is, whether everyone is equally able or not, as long as there is a chance of failure in investment activities, wealth will not be evenly distributed. In fact, as time passes, inequalities will increase, this has nothing to do with taxation, victimization or the availability of a good insurance policy. There are quite a few corollaries to consider as well, but I'll let you return to your ad hominem straw man attacks now.

  10. Re:MOD PARENT DOWN! Stole my comment!! by britneys+9th+husband · · Score: 2, Informative

    How to prove that your comment was stolen:

    1. Go to the anti-slash.org web site.
    2. In the upper-right corner, click on "tools."
    3. Click the link to "Use the Database Tool."
    4. Type your user name in the Author field.
    5. Look for your plagiarized comment in the search results (the site also provides you with a link to the original story).

    You can also go directly to the database tool (without having to click on the links I described) by going to http://www.anti-slash.org/tools/db/.

    --
    Hear recorded Slashdot headlines on your phone! New service beta testing. Just call (248) 434-5508
  11. I loved the series. by Leareth · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I was turned onto it by a local bookseller who is friends with the author and had read advance copies.

    I think it is a little misleading to call it Space Opera, because only the setting is such.
    No other Space opera even begins to touch on some of the issues addressed within.

    These include (but not limited too) what is truth, thought and humanity; ethics both of culture and individual; societal responsibility and individual responsibilities as well as human right vs societal rights; the nature of consciousness and how does perception affect it; the morel, societal and humanistic consequences of altering the human template; and whether tis nobler to quietly into that good night or rage, rage against the dying of the light.

    Mind you I also want to beat Mr. Wright soundly. Some of the concepts that he mentions IN PASSING ONLY almost deserve an individual exploration of a book of their own. I stopped counting at about twenty in the first book alone. It seemed like every single page he mentioned a concept and I though "Wow that'd make a great book..." and then he'd move on.

    Anywho, my $.02

    --
    *A)bort, R)etry, I)nfluence with large hammer.*
  12. Re:whoooosh by M.+Silver · · Score: 2, Funny

    So the differences between incomes in the first world and the third world are dependent on differences in abilites??

    "Abilities" at the scale of nations would have to include things like geography, natural resources, and so on. Why not?

    --

    Slashdot's token middle-aged housewife
  13. Some thoughts on Poverty and this Book by ewanrg · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Let me start with the obligatory link to a program designed to help address the problem of poverty in these current United States.

    With that out of the way, as one of the other posters has shown there are a number of factors that lead to poverty in the current world. There is no reason to believe in the kind of future that this trilogy describes that any of those factors would still apply. In fact I've been very disappointed that the author seems to allow people to "edit out" advertising but doesn't seem to consider that you can "edit out" knowing about people better or worse off than you. IOW, in that society why would I care to know I wasn't rich?

    With all that, I'd have to give these titles more of a mixed review. I think that the author has spent a fair bit of time coming up with some cool ideas. However, as with much of the genre, the characters seem dedicated to giving an excuse for the author to expound on the ideas than to actually giving us well-rounded characters who might make us learn or feel something new about the human condition.

    Just my .02 worth.

  14. Re:Cool by HappyCitizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sorry if I was unclear. SW EU stands for: Star Wars Extended Universe

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
  15. serious literature by xyr0 · · Score: 3, Funny

    sci fi books that are published as a series usually suck. i dont want to read 3 or 4 or even more books that are written the same way over and over and deal with topics in a pseudo-like way.

    if you want to find out about humans, society and such, serious literature is the way to go.

  16. Re:whoooosh by oob · · Score: 3, Informative

    Guet, if you haven't read his stuff already, I think you will enjoy Ken MacLeod's books.

    Dystopian near-future Science Fiction written by a Scottish ex-Trotskyite programmer with degrees in Zoology and Biomechanics.

    MacLeod is an astonishing writting talent and I think you will enjoy the political aspect of his books.

  17. Ending theme propaganda? by Ender77 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I loved the Golden age trilogy but I couldn't help wondering if the ending of transcendence was meant to reflect what is happening in Iraq now and was a form of propaganda. It talked about the golden age was over and how everybody would be drawn into a LONG war where certain liberties would have to be taken away to protect the greater good from the "ENEMY".

    I don't know, maybe its just me but with other scifi entertainment(star trek tv and games, knights of the old republic,etc) having propaganda mixed in I wouldn't be surprised.

  18. Fantastic Series! by Wire+Tap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I just got to the end of "The Golden Transcendence" and what a marvelous journey this trilogy has been. Hints of influence by authors like Gene Wolfe and David Zindell resound through the series, and a distinct flavor of Wright's background in law shines through in very well-composed ways.

    The hero of this story, a cyberneticly advanced individual named Patheon - many of the citizens of Wright's world use mythological and historical titles - who, in the first book, discovers that there are great portions of his memory - and life! - missing. Creatures from other planets visit, and often challenge, Patheon, tempting him with wealth, threatening him with violence and mind-rape, and informing him of hidden political struggles.

    It is very difficult to say much more about the story without giving away some fundamentals of the story, but it's safe to highlight some of the issues touched on in the series:

    Mortality
    Free Will
    What makes something 'alive'
    Space-colonization
    Love
    The venerable "Captain Kirk" problem - are you still yourself after you teleported? In this story, it was more along the lines of "Who are you after you have been ressurrected?"

    The sereis is a fantastic read, and I reccomend it to anyone who enjoys hard science fiction. While I would not consider this work _hard_ Sci Fi, it goes a bit past medium-soft. It's good stuff!

    --

    Man is born free; and everywhere he is in chains.

  19. Sensefilters = Augmented Reality by songbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Sensefilters sounds suspiciously similar to what Prof. Steve Mann in MIT has been proposing. See http://wearcam.org/

    --
    There are 10 kinds of people in the world - those that know binary, and those that don't.