Slashdot Mirror


Saturn V Fallen on Hard Times

n9fzx writes "The best remaining artifact of the Apollo Program, Huntsville's Saturn V, is 'pocked with pits and cracks, and patches of mold and mildew', having survived for forty years outdoors. Alabama's U.S. Space and Rocket Center is trying to raise a measly $5 million in order to preserve the beast, with $1.5 million in the kitty so far. Paypal, anyone?"

29 of 355 comments (clear)

  1. never should have been left to rot by Barbarian · · Score: 5, Interesting

    It should have been used! I assume this is a complete rocket and not a replica, and when the Saturn V's were in service probably could have been launched. It is too bad it was allowed to wither away. I assume that it was abandoned along with the other remaining Saturn V rockets when the moon program was suddenly terminated and the focus shifted to the low-orbit space shuttle.

    1. Re:never should have been left to rot by stephenhawking · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yes there were three more missions planned, and enough hardware to fly them. The three rockets are at Cape Canaveral (fully restored and inside a building made to house and display it), Mission Control Houston (outside), and the one at Huntsville, which is also outside. I've heard the one in Huntsville was raised to stand upright a couple of years ago. I've made a few trips to Cape Canaveral and Mission Control Houston, but I've never seen the Saturn V at Huntsville.

    2. Re:never should have been left to rot by October_30th · · Score: 5, Informative
      The original plan called for 20 Apollo missions.

      If I remember correctly, two complete Saturn V's were available when the program was cancelled. One of them was turned into Skylab and another into this showpiece. Apollo 20 was never assembled.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    3. Re:never should have been left to rot by kwpulliam · · Score: 4, Informative

      I live in Huntsville

      A few years ago, the Space and Rocket Center, paid way too much money for a BEAUTIFUL fiberglass replica shell to be built and stod up. It is life size and is accurate. It's a wonderufl sight to see coming in 565 or landing at the airport in the afternoon. This thing is I believe the second tallest structure in the state of Alabama, and it stands out like a giant sundial when you are at 1-2000 ft.

      Regardless, the original post was about the real hardware which was laid on it's side 40 years ago, and is viewable to this day. Ignoring the 'left to rot' aspect, the hardware was Unusable within a very short time, and it was understood when it was first laid down that it would never be considered flight worthy again. The $5 Mill. is merely to restore and preserve it so it looks nice. (and I do support the project to preserve it, even if I may sound like I don't)

    4. Re:never should have been left to rot by luckylindy · · Score: 5, Informative

      The following data is based on the technology available at the time of the design of the Saturn V and technology developed in the following years. Folks we had the means to colonize the moon and mars and we threw it away. It can be redeveloped with the proper political attitude and money. But will it? Woulda, Coulda, Shoulda.

      Part one: Capability of original Saturn V.
      Part two: With improved efficiency F1 main engines.
      Part 3: Improved F1 engines burning high efficiency kerosene/nanoaluminum powder fuels.

      Saturn V basic specs:
      Empty weight: 250 tons.
      Empty weight of first stage: 100 tons.
      Fueled weight 3000 tons.
      Takeoff thrust: 3750 tons.
      Takeoff weight / thrust ratio: 80/100.
      Thrust of each main first F1 engine: 750 tons.
      Efficiency of each F1 engine: 250:1
      Fuel consumption of each F1 engine: 3 tons/second.
      Ratio of LO2/Kerosene: 2 tons/1 ton/ second.
      Total mass of fuel consumed at and of first stage cutoff: 2250 tons
      Mass of all upper stages at seperation:650 tons.
      Thrust of second stage:600 tons.
      Net weight of two stage orbit capability, based on skylab data: 90 tons.
      Net weight of 2.5 stage orbit capability, based on moon launches: 150 tons.
      Net capacity escape to moon: 45-50 tons.

      Part two: Improved F1 engines:
      The russians designed during the Moon landing era LO2/kerosene engines with efficiencies of 333, sea level, which is 33% greater than the existing F1.
      That means the redesigned F1 engines could have produced 2 million pounds of thrust ( 1000 tons) at the same 3 tons per second consumption. That means that take off thrust of 5000 tons versus 3750 tons, an increased thow upper stage total weight jumping from 650 tons to 1650 tons and a probable doubling of mass to orbit:
      2 stage mass: 180-200 tons.
      2.5 stage mass: 300 tons
      3 stage escape mass to moon: 90-100 tons.
      So a conventional but improved F1 engine could hav e allowed supporting an early small manned colony on the moon.

      Part three: Use of NanoAlumimum powder in Kerosene fuels: Link: http://www.argonide.com/gun_propellants.html

      Based on the article, efficiency could increase at least 50%. If so then the 333 ISP of the 1970's technology could have been raised to 450.

      Thus, a possible F3 engine, designed for high efficiency and high energy fuels could have an efficiency rating of 450-500. That means that the Saturn V could have evolved into a rocket that could have placed:
      2 stage orbit: 300 tons
      2.5 stage orbit: 450 tons.
      3 stage escape: 150 tons.

      All this without resorting to adding side boosters to the Saturn vehicle. If side boosters of equal or better design than that used by the current space shuttle could have been added to the Saturn V then that vehicle could have evolved to place in orbit perhaps 600 to 1000 tons and have capacity to put into escape 300 tons.

      The mass of the current space station is now 200 tons and if core completed will weight 300 tons. It is estimated that the requried mass of a mars expedition space ship will be 300 tons.

      The world could have been colonizing the moon right now and be on the verge this year of making the jump to mars.

      Hundreds of years ago the Chinese sent a huge fleet to colonize the world. It went entirely around the world leaving historical evidence everywhere and bring home innformation. The Mandarins then dismantled the entire fleet, forbid exploration and became a closed society until Admiral Perry forcibly opened them up to the world.

      Why does the high sounding Bush administration's new space vision really feel like a mandarins sleight of hand maneuver to gut the space program like they are gutting everything else.

      Folks, the technology exists NOW. The means is there. But will the politicos actually allow the opportunity?

    5. Re:never should have been left to rot by the+Llama+of+Virtue · · Score: 4, Insightful

      The Saturn V that is standing up is a mockup, the real Saturn V is lying horizontally on its land transport carriages (essentially individual, blue, trailers) Interesting anecdote, back in the 70's someone wanted to take the Saturn V away, to the smithsonian or something. Werner von Braun, outraged, went out one night and smashed in the axles on the transport carriages to prevent their movement. They decided not to take it away. For being in such bad shape it still looks beautiful. I saw it about a month ago (I go to school in huntsville) Very impressive to be a mere 10 feet from the vehilcle. I remember in high school when I visited on a trip they let us sit in one of the rocket nozzles to get our pictures taken (which probably didnt help the damage any) but even as a kid youre awe inspired sitting in a vehicle that could take man to the moon
      -philski-

  2. I remember that thing by The+Tyro · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We used to drive past that rocket whenever we would travel to visit family down in New Orleans.

    It looks big in person... looked even bigger as a kid... truly an impressive sight.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
    1. Re:I remember that thing by porksodas · · Score: 5, Informative

      Here is a picture, with some people next to it for comparison.

      It's big, indeed.

  3. For $5 million bucks... by Op7imus_Prim3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Hell, I could build my own themepark on the moon! With hookers, and blackjack! Forget the blackjack.

  4. Something better to do with the money by phr1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    According to this post, only about $40 million would need to be raised to service the Hubble Space Telescope, one of the best and most productive scientific instruments ever made. The Saturn 5 out at Huntsville is just a big hunk of metal laying on the ground, completely nonfunctional, and sure, maybe it gets even more pockmarked as the years go by, but it's not like it's going to suddenly vanish or anything. And anyway, unless something has happened, there's another one on display at Kennedy Space Center (I saw that one in the early 80's). I'd say put the $5 million toward servicing the Hubble and actually accomplish some useful exploration, rather than just polishing up a relic of glory days gone by.

    1. Re:Something better to do with the money by October_30th · · Score: 5, Insightful
      With all due respect to the Hubble which has indeed been one of the best and most productive scientific instruments ever made, I don't think servicing it would be rational.

      Hubble's successor is launched in 2010 and any money is definitely better spent on the successor rather than the old Hubble.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:Something better to do with the money by eclectro · · Score: 4, Insightful

      According to this story, the shuttle mission was cancelled because of NASA's new focus of going to mars, given to us by the vision of George W Bush.

      While it would only take $40 million to service hubble, $3.5 million is alot easier to raise than the additional $38.5 million for hubble.

      So the choice is not really between fix up Saturn V or service hubble but rather between man on mars or servicing hubble.

      What would you rather have, a man on mars collecting samples (that may be done by a robot for a fraction of the cost) or all the scientific discoveries of the universe that are continuosly made by hubble?

      It's a safe bet that because of George W. Bush "man on mars" initiative any Saturn V repairs are going to be completely off the radar as well, unless maybe you get a bunch of schoolchildren to toss in their dollars (as they did for the statue of liberty).

      If I were an astromoner, I'd be pretty mad too.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  5. one way trip to mars, anyone? by vnv · · Score: 5, Interesting
    "They come up with a plan to launch a manned, one-way mission to Titan using the remaining shuttle fleet and vintage Apollo spacecraft and Saturn V launchers."

    If Stephen Baxter could use the Saturn V for a one way trip to Titan, I see no reason why we can't use it for Mars instead! Baxter has even done the research :-)

    And just for the record, yes the book does drag, but it also has a great story of a dilapidated American space program doing something heroic which I found a tale worth reading.

  6. sheesh... by mraymer · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Yeah, it's only one of the most important human creations of all time. No big deal or anything. I can see why raising $1.5 mil would be an issue...

    Oh wait, that doesn't make sense at all.

    Too bad I don't have an extra $1.5M lying around somewhere. Maybe I could talk to Capital One about raising my credit limit? ;)

    Anyway, it was truly a remarkable construction. Everything about the Saturn V was huge. From the buildings involved in construction to the enormous crawler built to haul the damn thing. We're talking an absolutely massive scale... In fact, according to the history channel's show Modern Marvels, the only human-produced sound louder than a Saturn V at lift-off is the detonation of an atomic bomb.

    It is a historical irony that space exploration takes second place to mass destruction in decibel output, though. Perhaps that says something about human nature?

    --

    "To confine our attention to terrestrial matters would be to limit the human spirit." -Stephen Hawking

  7. Interesting stuff about Saturn V by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Only has a Thrust To Weight of 1.5 (compared to >2 TW on a Eurofighter)

    Weighed 5 million pounds fueled

    Main engines burned for less than 2.5 minutes

    Was travelling 6,000mph at burnout

    Was slightly more fuel efficient than a Crystler SUV

    --
    Beep beep.
    1. Re:Interesting stuff about Saturn V by thogard · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I've seen a F15 go up at an AFB (not a air show where its much less impressive). I've seen most of the Sat V go up too from Coco beach or the three mile observation point. They where much more impressive. The F15 at 4 minutes is at 104,000 ft and out of fuel but the Saturn V would put the 2nd stage above 40 miles up in less than three minutes while being downrange 78 miles. Apollo 17 was launched at night and turned part of the sky blue. It was quite impressive.

  8. Correction by October_30th · · Score: 5, Informative
    Just to correct some ambiguities/mistakes in my own post above.

    Apollo 20 was indeed assembled and serves as a memorial to the workers at the Michoud Assembly Plant near New Orleans. The first and second stages on display in Houston were originally slated for Apollo 19. The booster used for Skylab was that of the Apollo 18.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  9. Re:Feed The Hungry by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The hungry are not dieing from lack of money. They are dieing from corruption, apathy and malice, to name a few. Think Zimbabwe.

  10. Historical Perspective by publiusREX · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Remember the Viking sailing ships?
    Remember Columbus' sailing ships?
    Remember the Conestoga wagons?
    Remember the first steps off this planet?
    and onto another world?

    It tells who we are, like it, or not.

  11. Use the money elsewhere?!? by Tokerat · · Score: 4, Insightful


    Yes, while we're at it, if the Statue of Liberty begins to fall apart, no worries, we'll just let it fall over.

    Effiel Tower? Nah, France surrenders.

    Big Ben? I already have a watch!

    Taj Mahal? Whatever, we can just visit it virtually since they scanned it with 3D lasers or whatever...

    </sarcasm>

    What's with all the "who cares" posts? If you don't care, don't donate to fix the rocket. Go feed the hungry or whatever. Jeez, I've said this twice before in the last 24 hours, but geeks/engeneers really will find a way to disagree with anything just for the sake of argument. It's the god damned Saturn V! This ain't just America's history, this machine brought the first MAN to the moon. I say preserve it at all costs!

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    1. Re:Use the money elsewhere?!? by bsartist · · Score: 4, Funny

      geeks/engeneers really will find a way to disagree with anything just for the sake of argument.

      No we dont. ;-)

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  12. There is one in FL by Danathar · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a complete Saturn V indoors in a facility at the Kennedy Space center. Its in great shape (at least from the outside) and totally protected from the weather. Its in a museum facility that anybody can see.

  13. Re:Feed The Hungry by Mod+Me+God · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Well said. $2 a day given to the world's starving will not reach the starving, it would line the pockets of corrupt officials or get soaked up in the vast inefficiency the majority of charities operate with.

    Space exploration (or historic preservation) and removing world poverty are not mutually exclusive. Ending world poverty requires removing corruption and improving logictics in 3rd world countries, pumping money at them will not solve these problems, it will sustain them.

    --
    --

    FreeNET user? Comfortable with the adverse selection?
  14. 5 million? by markh1967 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This seems a lot of money to preserve what is mostly a large metal tube. What are they planning on doing that will cost that much? It's a museum piece so the components don't have to be kept in working order; it just has to look intact wherever they are visible.

    --
    Input error. Replace user and press any key to continue.
  15. Re:Feed The Hungry by richie2000 · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Damn. I have modpoints, but no "-1 Troll, Insightful but Heartless Cynical Bastard, Flamebait and Underrated" mod option. Oh, well.

    In a short-sighted, cold and logical sort of way, you are absolutely correct. However, we as a species like to think that we are both social and moral creatures and our actions today affect our lives tomorrow. Therefore, just letting the 3rd world starve is not just wrong in a moral sense, it's not smart considering what will happen a few years down the road when the remaining billions come for our throats.

    Then again, we (the peoples of the "West") really need to have this discussion. We've needed it for over a hundred years, but no one has been willing to pick it up, for various reasons. USA for Africa is just a Band-Aid (in your face, Bob Geldof!), but we will need to help them somehow, and soon - if for no other reason than our own long-term survival on this planet. The present state of affairs is not sustainable.

    --
    Money for nothing, pix for free
  16. Obvious solution... by pieterh · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cut the damn thing into hand-sized pieces, seal in plastic bags, sell them for $25 a piece and use the proceeds to send Carly to Mars on a one-way mission to sign outsourcing contracts with the Martians.

    Damn, my living room museum needs a brick from the Berlin Wall, a chunk of the Biggest Rocket Ever Built, and a single hard-copy SCO share to go along with my original mint-condition 20-diskette pack of IBM's OS/2 (which never flew, either).

  17. JSC Saturn V by Alioth · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I used to work (until about 1.5 years ago) pretty much opposite the Johnson Space Center in Houston. They have a Saturn V outside there - I often took people who came to visit me to JSC, and we'd have a look around the rocket park.

    It's an impressive thing up close. From our parking lot at work, it didn't look that impressive. But when you got up close to it, it was another story.

    However, the Saturn V at JSC is also in pretty poor shape - it's corroded right through in places if you look closely. The white paintwork on the CM is badly cracked. Apparently, it also became a home for some owls (which is not a bad thing really).

    The best artifact inside JSC is an Apollo capsule that went to the moon and back. You can actually (or could when I was last there) touch the heat shield - it's neat touching something that's been to the Moon and back. When you look at it closely, with its primitive electronics and its small size, you wonder how they ever did it.

  18. Fly them? I couldn't agree more by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As was discussed recently, they have a lot to teach us.

    I'm not convinced at all that we should be spending billions of dollars of government money on new launchers when we have a system sitting around that works very nicely, thank you very much.

    Sure, a brand new system would be better, but between the brevity of our pass by-with Mars, the vitality of private space programs, and our humbled and abused government finances, perhaps the Saturn should be more then a five million dollar paperweight and conversation piece.
    And even beyond that, nothing gives perspective on a subject liking getting to look up close and personal at the gear used to do it. Especially since leading-edge gear from the seventies and earlier (like, say, the Spirit of St. Louis) always looks so DIY to anybody who pays attention.
    I found it very energizing when I was a kid to see the Kennedy Space Center Saturn and think "hmm.... that wouldn't be so hard to build at all".

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.
  19. Auction it off by xtermin8 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ebay anyone?