Slashdot Mirror


Real Announces Helix Grant Winners

elaineg writes "We're happy to announce the 2003 Helix Community Grant Program winners for development of open source projects on Helix. They are to UC Santa Barbara for providing robust multicast support in Helix, the Justin Karneges and Ulrich Staudinger at the Jabber Foundation for Jabber/Helix integration, Robert Kaye at MusicBrainz for integrated metadata cleanup in the Helix DNA Client, Jesse Schell at Carnegie Mellon University for integrating the Panda3D game and simulation engine with Helix, and the Xiph.org Foundation for further R&D and support of Ogg Vorbis and Ogg Theora codecs, including Helix DNA platform integration. More details can be found in the press release. Also, in vaguely related news, we've released Milestone 2 of the Helix Player for Linux." Helix styles itself as "the first open multi-format platform for digital media creation, delivery and playback", and has been created by Real Networks.

149 comments

  1. Its good to see by HappyCitizen · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That Org Vorbiss R&D is given an award. Its a good format IMO

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
    1. Re:Its good to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the winner is!!!!...

      Buffering...

    2. Re:Its good to see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hahaha. Now that's comedy.

      YLFI
  2. They should have more screenshots. by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    If this one is anything to go by it looks like they may have created something better than the old players from hell.

    Simply a menu bar, a playback area and some control buttons. Lovely.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:They should have more screenshots. by herrvinny · · Score: 1

      It looks too utilitarian. I hope they get some people working on interface design.

    2. Re:They should have more screenshots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      a menubar playback area and some control buttons, simplicity is a positive. what else is necessary, its a media player. not an organizer etc.

    3. Re:They should have more screenshots. by Joe+Tie. · · Score: 1

      Yep, that's the way the gui layout looked last time I tried helix, a couple weeks ago. My favorite feature is in the options though, the ability to choose betwean sound systems.

      --
      Everything will be taken away from you.
    4. Re:They should have more screenshots. by rgammon_real · · Score: 4, Informative

      The UI is written in glade, and the helix engine is wrapped in a GtkWidget-based GObject.

      This makes it easy to create your own UI or even custom player

      UI feedback is welcome on the users mailing list, users@player.helixcommunity.org, which you can subscribe to on https://player.helixcommunity.org.

      --
      Check out Helix Player
    5. Re:They should have more screenshots. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Like other people already have said.
      When you go to drive a car, you leave your moped behind.
      For me my car is my distribution.
      I do _not_ install software that doesn't come with my distribution.
      My distribution is the polishing layer. It makes sure that all software runs together and are set up to fit well and interchange.
      It doesn't matter what distribution I am using, but you really need to make your player and codec avaible to it or I won't be using it.

      Microsoft next initiative is the NGSCB. It will provide unconditional acces for Microsoft on the computers installed.
      The same way these people trust Microsoft, the same way I trust my distribution.
      I trust it make securitypatches timely, I trust they don't put in backdoors (they compile alle my software) and I trust they check the code on every program they put 'under their wings'.

      As I said, my distribution takes care of every program.
      This is also means that when I buy a game, it must be Open Source. I put in the CD (or just download it from the net) and my distribution automatically detects the data and installs the right binary (which my distribution have compiled).

      The reason I only use my distribution for software is.
      Security. No program will ever be installed which haven't been checked. Also all programs gets updated automatically when a security hole is found.

      Ease of use.
      When I wan't a new funktion I search for the task I need to get done, and my distribution have chosen a primary choice that best does the task. I only need to search one place to get it.
      If i need a new plugin for some obscure video on the net, my distribution automatically installs it when needed.
      The distribution is _designed_. This means that all programs are polished to fit together, so I do not have more of one program that does the same task.

      So the biggest plus about my distribution is that it just make me do stuff.
      It is computing made easy.
      The only caveeat is that all software my distribution uses must be found in Open Source.
      So all 'raw' code lies floating all over the net, and it is my distribution responsebility to polish it to fit _my_ needs.
      What I also like is that I am not tied to my distribution.
      Since all my work I make comes from raw software (and my distributions also is in raw software), I can change distribution very easy.
      I do not have to install programs, since all programs I need, also is in the new distribution.
      All my datafiles are made with Open Source software, so my files are intact.
      It is just as easy for me to change distribution, that it is to change a CD.
      This also means it is ekstremely easy for me to change platform.
      I can go from X86, to sparc to PowerPC and even to some future computer architecture, without changing my computerhabits.
      Actually I don't need to care about the hardware, because every program I use is Open Source, and can be ported to that platform.

      So what Realplayer need to do, is cater for distributions. Get your software _in_ the distribution, not as third party rpms og tgz.
      I need to _use_ my computer, not install programs.
      If I wan't to se a movie it has to 'just work'.
      This also means, that if you wan't to have your codec to survive, you need it in the distributions.
      This means Open Sourcing. And not just your newest codecs, but all realplayer formats.

      How do you make money, you ask?
      There are a lot of ways to make money on software.
      First I pay for my distribution because they provide a _service_.
      One of the services they provide is giving me the programs I want. So my distribution pays you to give me what i want.
      This means that you cannot make money on old software, but only on making new.
      New is not as in new features, but also cleaning and bugfixing.

      The other way is to make a project.
      A project is a big task that needs to be acomplished.
      To do this effectlively alot of people donate alot of money to get the task done.
      It is not very good to make duplicate wor

  3. What is this crap? by phr1 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    The only important parts of realmedia are the realaudio and realvideo codecs which as far as I know are proprietary. All attempts to integrate open formats like Vorbis into realplayer are only helping spread the disease. Why does anyone think it's interesting? Until the realaudio and realvideo formats are opened, integrating those other formats is just helping Realmedia Corp. co-opt the open formats.

    1. Re:What is this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They are giving you a free player that supports open formats as well as their own. Seems potentially valuable to me even if you don't want their codecs.

    2. Re:What is this crap? by enosys · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Don't they at least deserve some credit for not being Microsoft?

    3. Re:What is this crap? by starm_ · · Score: 1

      Can you even get a free player for real format these days? I think there is only 14 day demo but prove me wrong.

    4. Re:What is this crap? by brain159 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Immediately underneath their blue cross-bar under their tab navigation stuff, at the right, are the magic words "Free RealOne Player".

      If you look closely in the Preferences dialog you can also disable the "check for new messages" junk which is also a major source of pissing-everyone-off.

    5. Re:What is this crap? by waxed · · Score: 1


      http://www.real.com/freeplayer/?rppr=rnwk

    6. Re:What is this crap? by dragonfly_blue · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. Giving Real the opportunity to exploit our hard-won Open Source formats to further gain market share strikes me as a horrible decision.

      --
      Free music from Jack Merlot.
    7. Re:What is this crap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree. Any company that supports OGG in their products should be boycotted.

    8. Re:What is this crap? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Until the realaudio and realvideo formats are opened, integrating those other formats is just helping Realmedia Corp. co-opt the open formats.

      Of you don't want groups to co-opt your open format, then don't release an open format.

      I thought the whole point of open formats to be used?

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    9. Re:What is this crap? by kforeman · · Score: 3, Informative

      We are building the industry's best Linux and open source media player. Yes, we haven't open source our RealAudio and RealVideo codecs because we can't. We don't own all of the IP inside of those codecs. However, the Helix Player with Ogg and SMIL support are 100% open source. Let me say that again. 100% open source. We are pleased to be working with the open source community to finally standardize on a legitimate media player that plays all formats, even those that are not open, like MP3, MPEG4, Flash, RealVideo 10, RealAudio 10, etc. Take Milestone 2 for a run at www.helixcommunity.org. Kevin Foreman GM Helix, RealNetworks

      --
      Kevin Foreman
    10. Re:What is this crap? by GooberToo · · Score: 1

      Personally, I think what you guys are doing is great. As usual, there are many people that are either too ignorant to know a good thing or too clueless to realize that companies have to exist too.

      What Real is doing, is good stuff. Keep up the effort!

  4. Pre-compiled milestone 2 binaries for x86/Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anywhere I can get these?

    Second request--any way to get binaries that don't have GTK2 button order?

    TIA!

  5. $1,995 price tag by IDreamInCode · · Score: 1

    Does this mean I'll still have to pay the $1,995 price tag?

    1. Re:$1,995 price tag by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes. Plus, you still have to pay your $699 SCO licensing fee.

  6. OMG!! REAL!! run! by xot · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Its a Real thingy, we can safely ./ignore -wTf helix

    --
    Lord of the Binges.
  7. Re:Wow... by Rosco+P.+Coltrane · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Aaww well yes, they do suck, but I also remember a time when they were the only maker of serious software to play video on Linux, and I was really grateful to be able to play realaudio and realvideo files on my then badly supported pet OS.

    I guess it's like a moped : when you're a kid, you feel the biggest guy in town on your little buzzing machine, then you get your driver's license and your first car, and your hate the thing for taking up so much space in the garage and stinking the place up with that awful gasoline stench. But remember you once liked it though ...

    --
    "A door is what a dog is perpetually on the wrong side of" - Ogden Nash
  8. what? by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 0, Redundant

    That's what we have with RealOne player.

    It sucks, remember?

    Simple good.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  9. Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Informative

    How much helix sucks. I just downloaded the player for Win32 and attempted to play an MP3 stream which is played flawlessly by Winamp, iTunes, WinMP, and XMMS. Helix played it full of chirps, like it was a bad MP3 from Usenet circa 1993, and to top it off it stopped to do a "Buffering..."

    I can't make this up.

    1. Re:Let me be the first to say by Duncan+Howard · · Score: 1

      As yet, there is no Windows version of the Helix player. You are either lying, or mistaken.

    2. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sorry, there were no mp3's back in 1993.
      please drive up to the window.

    3. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then what is this???

      You are either lying, or mistaken.

      How funny is that? You lying about lying!

    4. Re:Let me be the first to say by Duncan+Howard · · Score: 2, Informative

      Ok, I understand what you were downloading. Splay and helixplay are "sample" applications. They are provided with the Helix DNA client source to provide developers with examples of how to work with client core. I thought your were talking about the GTK Linux player (http://player.helixcommunity.org), which has not been ported to Windows.

    5. Re:Let me be the first to say by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't blame us for lying--we've been dispensing Realbullshit for so long that we can't help ourselves.

      Hi, I'm Duncan Howard, and I peddle 2nd-rate scumware for a living.

  10. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by DA-MAN · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here is the direct link for the download!

    http://forms.helixcommunity.org/helixdnaclient/

    Here is a quick tutorial on making an rpm of it.
    http://fedoranews.org/tchung/helixplayer/

    And since there is no Windows version of the HelixPlayer, here is the link to the RealOne Player:

    http://www.realone.com/R/RC.012004realhome_1_1_2_1 _1_2.ecomm...R/forms.real.com/real/realone/realone .html?beta_bypass=true&bbits=true&type=dlrhap_bb&& pp=home&src=012004realhome_1_1_2_1_1_2

    --
    Can I get an eye poke?
    Dog House Forum
  11. Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Myself · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...must have something up their sleeve. Everything Real has ever done has been user-hostile, with the express aim of taking control of your computer away from you.

    Without some absurdly good justification (a new board of directors with Mother Theresa as chairperson?), I can't believe that Real would do anything "open" without an ulterior motive.

    1. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The whole point of this Helix project is to let people build a nerd-friendly, spyware-free RealPlayer for nerds.

    2. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by joe_bruin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      okay, here it is:
      real is getting their ass handed to them in the formats market. divx/xvid/mpeg4 format files are everywhere. quicktime sorenson is thriving in its own nitch. realvideo formats are nowhere except for low end streaming, and that market is drying up.
      in the music field, mp3 is the king, but wma and itunes m4a/m4p are catching up. ogg is out there for the geeks. meanwhile, real's audio and drm formats are decaying. their portable strategy is even worse (having sat in on some meetings with them, in a nutshell it is "[insert platform] is not currently supported").
      their players are spyware-ridden, buggy (buffering...), and annoying (being a pioneer in the player "skinning disease" that every media player seems to suffer from now). smart users avoid them like the plague, and stupid users, well, they have windows media player already installed.

      the only reason to have the real player installed on your machine right now is if there is some real content that you need to see. real's motive here is to make their streaming servers the choice of the geeks. microsoft is edging them out of the streaming server, but the problem is, you need to run windows to serve windows media format streams, and they are not (officially) supported on linux/unix clients. by giving the source (for what, really, a streaming server and client? big deal), they get cross platform compatibility, good pr, some free porting efforts, and a last foothold in their dying market. now, when your boss comes to you and says "we need a streaming video server", will you say "let's put up a winxp machine and stream asf", or will you say "real helix server on one of our linux boxes"?

      the fact is, they still suck. but at least now you don't have to rely on their shitty software as much as previously, at least making them a viable option. that's what their up to. whether it succeeds is yet to be determined.

    3. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by rgammon_real · · Score: 1

      Glad to hear Helix is a viable option! ;)

      Re: your codec comments, the helix client page has some technical information on the codecs. The latest helix client & player also supports the AAC audio format, as seen in iTunes among other places.

      As for DRM and devices, https://devicedrm.helixcommunity.org/ talks a bit about that.

      --
      Check out Helix Player
    4. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by rgammon_real · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'd also add that the news page talks a lot about how helix is being used by our partners. Worth a read! https://www.helixcommunity.org/

      To name the top few, in order of appearance:

      --
      Check out Helix Player
    5. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by kforeman · · Score: 5, Informative

      Guys, its really simple. Over 65% of our revenue now comes from consumer content services like RealOne SuperPass (content from CNN, ABCNEWS, Major League Baseball, etc) and Rhaposdy (streaming music service) This business model has allowed us to build great free(gratis) and open source (libre) software products, like the Helix Player. Kevin Foreman GM, Helix, RealNetworks

      --
      Kevin Foreman
    6. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Err... why does http://player.helixcommunity.org/ redirect to https? Especially since your cert isn't properly set, or something, I get a bunch of security warnings going to the page.

    7. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by EverDense · · Score: 1

      Without some absurdly good justification (a new board of directors with Mother Theresa as chairperson?)

      So, having an Undead Nun on the board of directors is a GOOD thing?

      --
      http://jesus.everdense.com/
    8. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have "Really" wasted your life developing this. Two years from now, no one will remember Helix. No one will remember this AC post on /. either, but this only took me 60 seconds.

      Kudos for struggling to breathe some more life into Realmedia in the face of its crushing, near-total irrelevancy. I guess we all have to choose sides, and you have chosen...poorly.

    9. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmmm, I asked about a dozen people at work and I can't find anyone at work who has even heard of RealOne SuperPass. Oh well, I'm sure it's nothing to worry about.

      Keep up the work, we're all rooting for you (to stop circling the drain and just plunge right in).

      And the horse you rode in on,

      AC

      (sorry, don't want the taint of Real attached to my /. ID in any way)

    10. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's put it this way: when the SCO hits the fan, do you want the Undead Nuns for you, or against you?

    11. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Possibly to circumvent cookie-ignoring, ad-blocking, referer-stripping proxies (like JunkBuster) that can't handle https.

    12. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      don't want the taint of Real attached to my /. ID in any way

      Yeah, because as we all know, if you're on slashdot, you want nothing that's real even near you.

    13. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by dipipanone · · Score: 1

      a new board of directors with Mother Theresa as chairperson?

      Mother Theresa (if she wasn't dead) would make a pretty good celebrity shill for Real Networks. They both have very similar value systems.

    14. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by HiThere · · Score: 1

      And this means you should be trusted because?

      The player being open should mean that it will be very difficult for spyware to be snuck into it. So that's a plus. And I understand that you have abundant business reasons to maintain a monopoly over the player...damn, there's that word.

      I find it quite difficult to trust a monopoly, even in a small niche. There've been just too many examples of monopoly positions being abused. (Like every one I've heard of that's been looked at closely.)

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    15. Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by pmsyyz · · Score: 1

      How most people feel about Real:
      http://pms.colonpee.com/irc/realplayer.txt

      Helix looks promising. The win32 nightly build isn't as nice looking as the GTK version though.

      --
      Phillip
  12. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do you think the POS company has a future? I doubt it, when was the last time Real posted a profit? No one needs to buy Real software!

  13. What the? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You seem to be saying that getting Realmedia to adopt open formats is a bad thing?

    Sure, we'd all like all the codecs to be open but in the meantime proprietary+open is better than proprietary alone. Pre-existing proprietary codecs are never going to be opened. Whatever they or we want sorting out all the patents and licences to do so would be an unbelievable amount of effort. You can't just "undo" proprietary development like that.

    What we can do however is help Realmedia see the value of Open formats here and now. We can't change their history but we can try and guide their future.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    1. Re:What the? by ThogScully · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I wish I had mod points to mod you up. I know the general consensus here is that Real is a bad company, but personally, I like being able to listen/watch streams in Linux because my other option is essentially not to listen/watch streams.

      I'm glad someone's giving me an option and the fact that they're using open protocol standards also only emphasizes that some websites may now choose that format in the comfort of knowing there is a bigger installed base.
      -N

      --
      I've nothing to say here...
    2. Re:What the? by phr1 · · Score: 0
      You seem to be saying that getting Realmedia to adopt open formats is a bad thing?

      Yes. I'd rather that they either go completely open and be embraced as a standard, or else stay completely proprietary so they can die out as quickly as possible and be replaced by open formats. I don't see this mixed open/proprietary stuff as doing anything but prolonging our agony.

    3. Re:What the? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But Real Networks does see the value in open source - they see the value of getting people to promote their proprietary stuff for them - for no pay. Seriously, they really don't share any of the values we associate with open source - this really is just exploitation by pretending to give a shit about open source.

    4. Re:What the? by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I'd rather that they either go completely open and be embraced as a standard, or else stay completely proprietary so they can die out as quickly as possible and be replaced by open formats.
      And I'd rather travel to work in a flying car, get paid a million dollars for an hours work and drive home to my wives Sarah Michelle Geller and Jennifer Love Hewitt for a bit of nookie.

      Unfortunatly I live in the real world.

      • Real cannot feasibly open up their closed codecs.
      • They cannot simply dump their closed codecs in favour of open ones as they clearly must continue to support existing customers.
      • There is no indication that if Real were to die there would be any great migration to open formats. Instead there would be a migration to the only other format that has an existing installation base. Microsoft Media Player.
      Real providing access to open formats provides a migration path. It's incredibly hard to get people to switch from one thing to another without one of those.
      --
      Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
    5. Re:What the? by phr1 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't see why they can't open the closed codecs. Other companies open formerly closed programs or formats all the time. Even Flash has been opened, fron what I understand (the format, not the Macromedia implementation).

    6. Re:What the? by waxed · · Score: 2, Informative

      Even if RealNetworks wanted to open up the codecs completely (not to say they don't), they couldn't; some chunks of code inside the codecs are not RealNetworks property. There are technologies utilized in the codecs that are owned, copyrighted and patented by third parties (Intel, Sony, etc.) and licensed and built upon by RealNetworks. RealNetworks almost certainly does not have their permission to release the code they don't actually own.

    7. Re:What the? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Realmedia is inferior and obsolete. Supporting Real just delays the inevitable, justified replacement of their media formats from the web. Good riddance.

      That flushing sound you hear is me "guiding their future."

  14. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by glassesmonkey · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think the link to the windows Real One player should be a *hint* to everyone about what this company is about.. Note: the link is NOT http://realone.com/download/realoneplayer_free.exe but rather a game to trick the average person into going somewhere they did not want to go.

    Does anyone think all the recent PR on slashdot in favor of Real (including quotes about having changed their ways and favorable comments from Helix community) is that much different from the clicky trickery just to download the player? It's just more of the same "try our great new player".. You just wait for the other RealOne(TM) shoe to drop.

  15. Whither Ogg Theora? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm beginning to think Xiph may fade and disappear at this rate. The Theora mailing lists appear to be dead, there've been no 'Ogg Traffic' updates for a couple of months, and Theora's still at "Alpha 2" half-a-year after it was originally scheduled to be "finished"....

    I'd played with the alphas and liked the video and sound quality. Seemed like a really promising format, so hopefully they won't let Theora languish and will use some of the grant money to get back to work on it, but I wouldn't hold my breath...

    1. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by marshall_j · · Score: 2, Informative
      The milstones for the Helix player suggest that support for Theora will be included as at milestone 4 - june 2004.

      Quote:

      Media Types Supported:
      • All modern RV and RA codecs (RV10, RA10, RV9, RV8, RA8, RVG2, RV7)
      • MPEG4 enabled (codec not bundled)
      • MP3, H.263, G2 Audio, Ogg Vorbis, SDP
      • Full SMIL 2.0 Support
      • AIFF, wav, au, RealText, Flash, RealPix
      • Ogg Theora Support
    2. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by evilviper · · Score: 2, Insightful
      and Theora's still at "Alpha 2" half-a-year after it was originally scheduled to be "finished"....

      Yes, development is going slow, unfortunately, but I'm sure it's not stopped. My main concern is not that it won't get finished (I'm sure it will) but that once it's finally done, it'll be so far behind the curve that nobody will want to use it.

      Theora isn't dead. There is Theora support in Xine, MPlayer, and I'm sure other media players.

      Personally, I wish they would have just released a Unix VP3.2 encoder/player, instead of wasting a lot of time on trivial improvements. Windows users can use the VP3.2 Quicktime plugin (along with a quicktime Vorbis Plugin) and create patent-free movies, but us Unix folks are left out in the cold.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by vikman · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, Theora support in Helix Player is almost ready :) Look for it in a nightly build soon. The milestone schedule will change to show it when it gets in. Thanks to the support of our users and community, there are somethings that have gone faster than expected within the project.

      --
      --
    4. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by Ziviyr · · Score: 1

      I'm seeing development even if you're not.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    5. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      I'm not TOO worried about the "behind the curve" issue - what I saw in Alpha1 and Alpha2 leads me to believe that the final result will be very good...if there ever IS a final result, which is my one concern.

      I USED MPlayer's Theora support while testing Alpha 2, and it does work...but since Alpha 2 was released, there've been (incompatible but justifiable) changes to the CVS sources. (The previous poster is right - there IS, or at least was, still SOME development going on very quietly in the background since last June...at least as recent as 3 months ago, according to the last 'Ogg Traffic').

      Meanwhile I keep hearing that the Ogg file format (not the codecs) is horrible and nobody is that interested in working with it, but on the other hand I THINK that in most cases what's being discussed is the 'hacked together' unofficial ".ogm" format that got put together by impatient people tired of waiting for official specifications to come out of xiph.org. I'm hoping that Xiph someday gets official specifications openly published ('quietly checking some docs into CVS' doesn't quite seem to interest developers outside of Xiph...) soon. Meanwhile, all development appears to remain semi-secret (the developers don't even show up on the Theora development mailing list very often, and then usually only to answer some 3rd party's questions rather than discussing current development.) and Ogg Theora is, what, over a year behind the original schedule now? www.theora.org hasn't been updated in over half a year, either...

      I know, I know, every time Theora comes up I whine about this. Can't help it - what's there really IS very promising, it's just frustrating to see the development being kept 'hidden' and mostly dormant the whole time and no indication that anybody is really doing much with it. (I think I will try checking out current Theora CVS and MPlayer and see if MPlayer's Theora support still compiles or if the last CVS updates broke that...)

      Personally, I wish they would have just released a Unix VP3.2 encoder/player, instead of wasting a lot of time on trivial improvements. Windows users can use the VP3.2 Quicktime plugin (along with a quicktime Vorbis Plugin) and create patent-free movies[...]

      Well, THAT I'm not certain about - I've heard it said that Apple holds patents on the Quicktime file format itself. (Plus, I heard more than one developer comment that QuickTime(tm) is a real pain to work with. My impression is that Quicktime is to Multimedia File Formats what Emacs is to 'text editors'...).

      I'd go so far as to say that what little development news has been coming out seems to imply that most of the work is really being done on the Ogg file format rather than the Theora codec (that is, adjusting the Ogg format specifications to finally deal with more than just Vorbis streams), and related minor changes to the Theora codec specifications to fit with it. The "encoding video" parts of Theora SEEM like they're really pretty much done, though not yet optimized. Or in short, it SEEMS (from the nearly non-existent trickle of news) that all that's really left is little 'tweaks' and publishing real specifications, and the rest is just optimization, but it SEEMS (again, maybe entirely due to the "secrecy" of the development) as though nobody's bothering with even that little bit...

      (I suspect if SOMEONE would start putting out regular, readily available news - even if just a simple paragraph once each week, even saying nothing more than "the developers were too busy this week to do anything, but hope to be checking in more Theora updates in the next couple of weeks" or something of the sort - would go a long way towards keeping interest in the project from dying completely and/or giving the impression that 'outsiders' are not welcome...)

      Okay, enough whining from me for now...

    6. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      Well, in THAT respect, Ogg Theora support is(/was) ALREADY "ready" in, for example MPlayer. Does this mean, though, that Ogg Theora is finally ready to be supported? (This is a genuine hopeful question, not a snide rhetorical one...) Has Xiph ironed out the last of the incompatible changes they needed to make and are getting ready to release specifications?

    7. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by Dr.Dubious+DDQ · · Score: 1

      True, there is SOME. Looking at today's CVS checkout (wish they still had WebCVS frontend available) the last code update to the theora lib itself was a month-and-a-half ago, though (unless maybe there have been more recent updates in the 'example players and encoders for win32 only' section).

    8. Re:Whither Ogg Theora? by evilviper · · Score: 1
      what I saw in Alpha1 and Alpha2 leads me to believe that the final result will be very good...

      Well, I tried Alpha 1, and it wasn't very good at all. More recently, I tried Alpha 2, and compared it very closely with the same video in MPEG4... The two seem to be pretty equal. With newer codecs comming out, and other improvements happening (like performance), I wouldn't be surprised if Theora won't be much competition in a couple years. Even now, mpeg4 encodes faster than Theora, so it's behind by a small extent already.

      Meanwhile I keep hearing that the Ogg file format (not the codecs) is horrible and nobody is that interested in working with it

      It's true that there are some people who say they don't like it, but most of them don't seem to like ANY format out there, so their opinions aren't very convincing to me.

      There isn't much competition in file formats. MPEG only works for MPEG-1/2. AVI is well-known for it's limitations. Matroska is an attempt, but I see much potential personally. ASF might work, but open source support is almost non-existant.

      Ogg/OGM has become popular because it's really the lesser evil. It's not perfect, but it certainly works, and does not have the limitations of most of the others. Perhaps it's odd, and perhaps it's hacked-together, but when did that ever stop something from becomming popular?

      I've heard it said that Apple holds patents on the Quicktime file format itself.

      I don't know about that... Quicktime has been around longer than anything, and MOV has been there from the beginning.

      (Plus, I heard more than one developer comment that QuickTime(tm) is a real pain to work with.

      MOV is actually pretty nice. I'm sure everyone has seen that it can do streaming pretty well, and it's main strength is that it's good for editing. Quicktime and Apple haven't gotten as popular as they are, in multimedia, by having crappy tools.

      I can't say how hard it is to code for, but it is a very robust file format.
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  16. You're wrong by SweetAndSourJesus · · Score: 1

    Free.

    I'm sure there's a windows counterpart.

    --

    --
    the strongest word is still the word "free"
  17. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by rgammon_real · · Score: 1

    The referenced "direct download" link is for the nightly builds of the helix player. The release MS2 build can be downloaded from here

    (You must register on helixcommunity.org and click through the binary eula to get access to it)

    The main page for the player project is at: https://player.helixcommunity.org/

    From there, you can access the web forums, mailing lists, and issue tracker.

    --
    Check out Helix Player
  18. Mplayer is your friend by adrianbaugh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    It plays almost everything I need it to play. As of pre3 the exception seems to be realaudio streams (which play but seem to lose sync after a while). I'm sure that'll be sorted out before long though - props to the developers!

    --
    "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
    - JRR Tolkien.
    1. Re:Mplayer is your friend by evilviper · · Score: 1
      It plays almost everything I need it to play.

      "almost" and "I need" being the key there. I've been on the mplayer mailing list for some time now, and I've heard no end to the feature/format requests. NSV support isn't in there for one.

      As of pre3

      I use that version as well.

      the exception seems to be realaudio streams (which play but seem to lose sync after a while).

      Not only that... RealVideo+Audio streams seem pretty lowsy. A video that is quite high quality, with a fast framerate (when played with RealPlayer) ends up very low quality, and an extremely low framerate (when played with MPlayer). Several MOV video won't play at all. Many WMV/ASF files are completely broken, so essentially don't play. And that's only on Linux. On other platforms there are a lot more limitations.

      That said, although it isn't perfect, and doesn't support everything, it's better than any other single media player around

      I'm sure that'll be sorted out before long though

      I have to doubt that. There are a lot of long-standing issues that just have never been fixed. Some formats being half-broken are just a few. MPlayer still doesn't have any semblance of DVD-Navigation support (it would be nice). All sorts of things are being put off until G2 is a reality, and that is a very very long way off.

      I think more and more people are switching to xine, which is more feature-stable and bugfree, while having a more idiot-friendly user-interface (although not as powerful).
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    2. Re:Mplayer is your friend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever looked into the code?

      You'll change your mind about mplayer quite quickly.

    3. Re:Mplayer is your friend by adrianbaugh · · Score: 1

      I have both installed. Xine is nice for some things (especially DVDs).
      But I'm not convinced about failure to fix broken things - I've noticed definite improvements between pre2 and pre3. While they may not be adding stuff like navigation support they do seem to be fixing bugs. I haven't come across the ones you mention, but maybe they're just really hard to fix.

      --
      "'I pass the test,' she said. 'I will diminish, and go into the West, and remain Galadriel.'"
      - JRR Tolkien.
  19. /. conformism wins out over independent thought? by jensend · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Look- everybody knows Real's mass market players have been horrible for quite some time. However, whenever anybody mentions Helix on /., any rational discussion is drowned out by a horde of people who haven't looked into Helix at all but want to get in their "R3AL I5 T3H 5UX0RZ!" me-too comment. Helix looks like a really solid effort, and the linux player is rather nice. Hopefully management will let them release a Windows port of the helix player as they intend to do.

  20. Where is the code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Redundant

    First they need to get their licensing scheme in order. Next when I can compile Helix from source code, then I'll take them seriously.

  21. Want to know what's going on with Helix? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Use the source, luke.

  22. Helix for ppc Linux? by mjc_w · · Score: 1

    This may be naive, but, can Helix be compiled for Yellow Dog Linux on Mac hardware?

    --
    This is the Constitution.This is the Constitution under the Bush administration. Any questions?
    1. Re:Helix for ppc Linux? by rgammon_real · · Score: 1

      The platforms supported by the helix player are listed here.

      Help is wanted for the powerpc port -- developers interested in porting should subscribe to the helix player developers list, dev@player.helixcommunity.org.

      --
      Check out Helix Player
  23. Just say NO to Real; use these alternate tools by coltrane679 · · Score: 2, Troll

    Real is hideous spyware, bloatware and crapware; the most recent version is worse than ever:

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A2 41 90-2004Jan17.html

    Instead, use these tools if Real Media is all that is available:

    Player: http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group _id=82303&package_id=84358

    Capture and convert to AVI: Use Real 7ime, more about it here:

    http://emoney.al.ru/capture-streaming-video-and- au dio/record-streaming-video-real-video.htm

    And if you want to see all the options for capturing streaming media:

    http://all-streaming-media.com/record-video-stre am /all-streaming-video-recording-software.htm

    FUCK REAL by any and all means possible.

    1. Re:Just say NO to Real; use these alternate tools by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And an AMEN to you brotha!

    2. Re:Just say NO to Real; use these alternate tools by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      To add to the info you give, I just stumbled upon this program today, it not only captures Real but several other formats, it seems very configurable and works quite well:

      NetTransport

    3. Re:Just say NO to Real; use these alternate tools by Big+Blingin · · Score: 0

      WTF?! Troll?! Real is a bunch of shitty codecs that haven't been useful since the mid 90s foolz! Ya'll best be moddin mah parent nizzy up!

      --
      Yah whutevah, you knows i be right foo'!! I PITY DA NOOB!!
    4. Re:Just say NO to Real; use these alternate tools by 31+Flavas · · Score: 1

      Desperatly trying to hang onto outdated facts is being a troll.

  24. Gstreamer.. by Ploum · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    Well, I prefer spending my time to develop applications using gstreamer and feeding the gstreamer's bugzilla.

    I've seen some mail about helix on the gstreamer and on the matroska dev list.

    It's very interesting, because the only thing that helix folks can say is : "Helix is really better because we have the best codec ever made : RV9. And if you join Helix, you can build a player that play RV9 file. If you don't join Helix, your player will suxx because it will not be able to play proprietary encoded RV9 videos and RV9 is the best codec that everybody will be using."

    I maybe wrong because my english is not perfect. I hope to be wrong... If not, please forget helix. it's disgusting...

    1. Re:Gstreamer.. by kforeman · · Score: 1

      Not quite. Our goal with the Helix Player is to crete the industry's best and standardized media player for Linux. One that is open source and plays as many formats as possible, including open source formats like vorbis and Theora, and non-open source formats like RealVideo 10, RealAudio 10, MP3, MPEG4, Flash, AAC, MB-AMR, etc. Its this reason why desktop application like Sun's Java Desktop System, mobile phones Eg Motorola and other embedded linux products are standardizing on Helix. Kevin Foreman GM, Helix RealNetworks

      --
      Kevin Foreman
    2. Re:Gstreamer.. by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      Bah, I just tried the Helix player. Know what's the common thing between hxplay and gst-player? Both totally choke on video. hxplay plays my icecast2 Vorbis stream beautifully. gst-player and rhythmbox didn't understand what the m3u was supposed to be and choked on direct URI. (Not that it matters, I tend to use xmms myself...)

      Okay, okay, special cases and all that.

      Neither appears to be perfect, though I think gstreamer looks a bit frostier in general with its very wide variety of plugins and very interestingly described API - nobody has made similar presentations of Helix architecture. Still, I wouldn't go flaming either camp, I'm sure both will eventually show something seriously promising, or even cooperation on key areas.

      The only bad thing I had to say about helixcommunity.org is the requirement to sign up to download and the Legalese Everywhere approach, Agree This, OK This thing. Far less painful than trying to get the player from real.com though =)

  25. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by Compenguin · · Score: 1

    Do you know what DR5 is and how it differs from MS2?

  26. Re:This is Wednesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's already Thursday in this part of the world, and guess what?

    We still hate RealNetworks.

  27. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The big question for me is who's going to get hit by any possible dropping of shoes. If I gain the ability to use an officially supported linux player with a gtk2 based gui, ability to choose sound api, and even the option to modify the gui, I don't really care what they do with the windows client. Heck, a company whose Linux release is better than the windows version is a welcome change from the norm.

  28. a cancer analogy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    From the parent post:

    You seem to be saying that getting Realmedia to adopt open formats is a bad thing?

    And you seem to be thinking that if you can give cancer cells unfettered access to healthy cells, everything will turn out A.O.K.

    Real has already repeatedly demonstrated that it doesn't give a shit about its users. Why on earth would anyone concerned with open source do a thing that serves this company's best interests?

    The sooner companies like Real go belly up, the better it will be for anyone who uses a computer. Streaming media will immediately shift to less proprietary sources, or non-proprietary sources. I challenge you: how does Real's continued existence serve anybody but the company's shareholders?

  29. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by rgammon_real · · Score: 2, Informative

    DR5 (Developer Release 5) is a September 22, 2003 release of the client sample players, splay (no gui -- video window only), and helixplay (cross platform basic gui, uses motif on linux).

    It does not include the hxplay, the gtk-based linux player.

    You should register on helixcommunity.org, as that gives you access to the web support forums, mailing lists, and issue tracker.

    But, if you insist on using a build from the nightly builds download page, your best bet would be Table "Tarball for 01/15/04", row "linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586" column "HelixPlayer"

    --
    Check out Helix Player
  30. Totally Lost by Compenguin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm totally lost here, I've registered all agreed to two seperate licenses but I can't find the source to M2. A little help here.

    1. Re:Totally Lost by rgammon_real · · Score: 1

      The download is here (requires helixcommunity.org registration, which you've done).

      It is an installer that you can "chmod a+x" and run. rpm's and tarballs are coming soon.

      The release notes for MS2 are here.

      --
      Check out Helix Player
    2. Re:Totally Lost by Compenguin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I got the binary installer, but what's confusing me is that the Release Notes say the source is availible but on the download page all I see are "hxplay-linux-2.2-libc6-gcc32-i586.bin" and "Test Plans." I'd love to get at the source because some minor things are driving me nuts.

    3. Re:Totally Lost by rgammon_real · · Score: 4, Informative

      The easiest way to get the source is here.

      You want the "01/21/04" table, "source" row, "HelixPlayer" column.

      You should be able to build this tarball by untarring it and typing make.

      It'd also be a good idea to subscribe to the dev@player.helixcommunity.org mailing list here

      You can also ask questions on irc.helixcommunity.org channel #player if you have feedback, or need a hand with the build system.

      Hope to see you on the mailing lists!

      --
      Check out Helix Player
  31. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by elohim · · Score: 1

    windows version: http://forms.helixcommunity.org/helixdnaclient/ind ex.html?filename=20040121/all_clients-helix-200401 21-win32-i386-vc6.zip

  32. Re:conformism wins out over independent thought? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Like you have to ask.

  33. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by rgammon_real · · Score: 1

    This is not the same helix player as the linux helix player. These are more basic test clients that are samples for developers working with the helix core.

    --
    Check out Helix Player
  34. Wow, Justin Karneges... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 1

    Good to see (former) TI Programmers making it big. First Jimmy Mardel wins the Google Code Jam, now Justin.

    For those that don't know, Justin Karneges created the Joltima RPG for the z80 processor based TI Calculators. He also worked with his company Affinix to create Joltima II (Infinity) for the Gameboy Color... unfortunately, they couldn't find a publisher, and by the time they did... the Gameboy Advance was released and they pretty much lost all hope.

    Personally, I'd still buy their game... looks like one of the best RPGs ever made for a portable.

    1. Re:Wow, Justin Karneges... by Drantin · · Score: 1

      Heh... may want to update your homepage URL there Tim ;)

      --
      Actio personalis moritur cum persona. (Dead men don't sue)
    2. Re:Wow, Justin Karneges... by }InFuZeD{ · · Score: 1

      True that =p

  35. Jabber by LS · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I think the guys over at Jabber need to work more on their shitty architecture before working on Helix.

    --
    There is a fine line between being a cultivated citizen and being someone else's crop. - A. J. Patrick Liszkie
  36. And how was the parent post a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Looking at some of today's RIAA story mods, plus mods like those directed at the parent article, make me wonder if Slashdot is getting co-opted by astroturf industry folks.

    We're seeing moderation that makes no sense whatever, unless you have vested interests in the RIAA or in spyware developers like Real. The parent post had all kinds of useful links and was clearly well thought-out. Marking it as a troll really raises suspicions about who is doing the moderation here.

    1. Re:And how was the parent post a troll? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a troll because he didn't hyperlink his URLs. Duh.

  37. Re:Wow... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ur right when people were pooping on linux left and right real stepped up to the plate...although they eventually served us a steaming pile of shit...just for old times sake ppl should give them a chance to do good.

  38. Re:/. conformism wins out over independent thought by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, superior media formats win out over Real, and have done so for years.

    People have had the blatantly inferior .rm/.ram forced upon them as the only media choice on many websites, and the inarguably horrible Realplayer as the only means to play that content. I won't even go into their sleazy marketing tactics, they deserve to wither away just based on the technical aspects of their product.

    You can't blame people for being resentful. Even if the company has completely changed--a big 'if' there--my response is still "So what?" Who needs Realmedia? There's a new, open-source player? So what? It might be useful for viewing the decaying Real content still out there on the net, but why should we promote the continued use of this crap?

    If a shiny new media player is all it takes to erase our memories and win back the geeks, maybe SCO should be taking notes.

  39. You can only open what you own by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 1

    If there's any third party IP in there then relicencing becomes a complete nightmare. The codecs suffer from this fate.

    You might recall a similar problem being faced with Mozilla. Stuff like the spell checker couldn't be opened and had to be left out of Mozilla and made available as a proprietary plugin by Netscape. With any luck over time the Open parts of the product will grow so as to render the closed parts into legacy. But that will take time. There is no magic wand that can change the past.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  40. Helix wins best open source project - Linuxworld by kforeman · · Score: 1

    Best Open Source Project:

    Company: RealNetworks, Inc.
    Product: The Helix Player Project in the Helix Community

    Check out the Helix Player at https://player.helixcommunity.org/2004/draft/MS2Re leaseNotes

    --
    Kevin Foreman
  41. Re:This is Wednesday by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I think you meant.

    We still hates Real Networks

  42. Disappointing plugin support for Helix by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I was hoping for a new plugin that would cause the little remaining Real content on the web to stop sucking so much ass, but apparently it is beyond the realm of modern science. Buffering...

  43. Odd, I've built it... by xiphmont · · Score: 1

    Subject sez it all. Although I must admit the build system on PPC requires a minor bit of chainsawing, and there's some trouble with gcc 3.3 due to gcc de-supporting varargs....

    Monty

  44. AntiTrust - Am I getting it? by s7726 · · Score: 1

    It looks to me like this helix thing is like what they were trying to do in the movie Antitrust. A stream to anything media distribution system. From what i read at the helix community site this could be the bassis for something like that. If i'm completely wrong and way off base please say so. It sounds interesting.

    1. Re:AntiTrust - Am I getting it? by WWWWolf · · Score: 1

      In the real world, the answer isn't on the band and the box won't help much either. Or something. Translated to human language, this means that streaming video is always, no matter what technology, unwatchable.

      =)

  45. I still can't get this thing to play anything by EMR · · Score: 1

    Well, I finally managed to get this new release to play mp3 and ogg files.. But it will not play anything else.. no mpg, rm, etc.. I am really dissapointed with this product so far.

  46. DNAHELICES.COM for sale by dnahelix · · Score: 1

    serious inquiries only.

    --
    Slashdot Eds Link Anonymous Posts With Logged Posts
    They Are Vermin Feeding On Each Other's Feces.
    I Hate \.
  47. Umm... what about the Grant Program? by elaineg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I manage the Helix Community Grant Program, and am really looking forward to working with the grant recipient choices. However, I am part of a larger team that's trying to effect change w/in Real... part of this effort is sharing the Slashdot community's thoughts with the exec team. Constructive comments are easier to convey than cranky responses about past perceptions. Help us out! We want to build products & release code that is for the greater good. With your support we can make this happen. Start here: what do you think about our Grant Recipient choices? Have you checked out the Helix Player project, or other projects in the Helix community?, Please advise...

    1. Re:Umm... what about the Grant Program? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it is a mistake to ask for registration to download your software. Helix is struggling against media players (xine, mplayer) who are mature and working well and are generally installed by default on a Linux distribution. I think the challenge for Helix is creating a user base for your media player in the Linux world.

      Make binaries for the main Linux distributions with an windows style installer where you click to accept the License for the proprietary codecs.

      Your home page is also pretty dull. Put some screenshots of your application and explain better why your stuff is better than the others.

    2. Re:Umm... what about the Grant Program? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      I find the multicast stuff fairly interesting, since I have in the past worked on streaming video using multicast. I guess I should've applied for grant money to integrate our multicast capability into Helix. In fact, Dr. Kevin Almeroth references some of our work, so maybe I should get in touch with him.

      Information on our multicast work can be found here:
      http://www.cs.wisc.edu/~vernon/sword.html

      Anyhow, on to your questions.

      People here will likely be pretty happy about the Xiph.org and Jabber grants. The tagging work also looks good for open source since it will be GPL or LGPL. I don't know much about the 3D work - it could be something Sun and their 3D desktop team would be interested in. But maybe not since it isn't Java3D.

      I haven't tried the Helix player, and honestly, I don't really have that much reason to. Had it been built about a year earlier, I might have more interest. But right now I'm pretty happy with what is available in the player space already (xine/totem, mplayer, VLC/VideoLan, etc). Plus the other players either come with the distro, or are easier to get than Helix. If Helix were easier to get through the distros, it may see more usage (ie. apt-get helix-player, urpmi helix-player, emerge helix-player). Having to register and login to see content and download OSS software is annoying.

      I wonder if there is the possibility to work with the other clients, or at least have compatibility with their codecs to avoid duplicate work. Even on the server side, it'd be nice to see some cooperation between Helix and others (Darwin,VideoLan).

      Right now it seems Helix is working together well with the research community, and the resulting work may push Real and Helix into newly emerging areas of media. Unfortunatly it seems that hasn't translated into downloads or deployments of the core client and server products yet. Even a lot of online radio stations seem to have made the move from .rm to .wmv (so likely from Real to WindowsMediaServer, even though the Real server does .wmv/.asf better than MS). As this used to be Real's strongest area, I'm starting to wonder what is left. Not many people liked the old Real branded players (as you can see from comments here, many were turned off forever by them), and not much content online is in .rm anymore.

      I guess I'd suggest getting the Helix player into the distributions (or at least create an easy way to download it). The Real player will probably continue to be popular with Sun's desktop and maybe other commercial Linux desktop offerings.

      Helix server integration into Apache is another area that would be really great (our SWORD prototype uses Apache, so I'd be doubly intrested in this). Since work is going into Helix and WebSphere integration, some of this work has likely already been done. Making this available to webmasters would be a nice way of competing with IIS/WMS integration in the Windows world. If this gets into the distros, suddenly Helix and Apache may be a base for custom PVR and home theatre applications.

      Unfortunatly for Real, a lot of this work is being done in parallel by other projects. As I said before, projects like mplayer, xine, VLC/VideoLan, and Darwin all can do what Helix does, and all of them are open source. The thing that could set Helix apart is the ability to do it all - integration with Apache, Jabber, Xiph.org, xine/mplayer codecs, streaming of rm/wmv/mov, etc. Also, a player that is more userfriendly than mplayer/xine would give Helix a leg up. Since these players have much maligned UIs, this would've been a great place for Helix to shine. But the others aren't standing still either, as a player like totem didn't take long to build and look pretty good.

      Hopefully this rant has something useful for you. I apologize that I don't have the time to rewrite this to be a bit more coherent.

    3. Re:Umm... what about the Grant Program? by codemachine · · Score: 1

      Someone should mod this guy up. I did, but then I wrote a comment, probably nullifying the moderation.

      This is good feedback. Hopefully it gets read.

  48. Real is NOT a software company by brrrrrr · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a small comment, though most people know real from the realplayer and helixserver, Real is primarily a content-broker. Their players support their business to buy and sell content to the likes of BT and DT. To me it therefore seems that want to move (part) the SW business (the development of which is a cost-centre) to the outside world, thereby increasing their overall operating margins.

    I think this is a smart way to work (from a business point of view) but ethically questionable.

    --
    brrrrrr it's cold
  49. Thanks! by robla · · Score: 1
    Thanks for letting us know we're appreciated for putting in the effort on Linux. The Helix Player team has been working really hard on our latest generation player, and took a really sensible direction (straight-up Gtk, no bells and whistles), and their hard work is really starting to pay off. It's clean and simple and gets the job done.

    As a Linux desktop user myself, I'm really keen on making the Linux desktop commercially viable; something that our primary commercial competitors don't have a lot of motivation to do. Hopefully, we can complement the existing enthusiast-driven open source efforts with commercially-attractive (supported, OEMed, blah blah) software, making the platform as a whole far more attractive.

    Rob Lanphier
    Helix Troublemaker

  50. Re:/. conformism wins out over independent thought by jsebrech · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "So what?" Who needs Realmedia? There's a new, open-source player? So what? It might be useful for viewing the decaying Real content still out there on the net, but why should we promote the continued use of this crap?

    What cross-platform content format would you suggest then? WMV is not an option due to it being windows-only (there's a mac version, but it's been discontinued). Quicktime has no linux version (though you can get it to run through crossover, but performance in that case of horrible). All the other formats are either not available on all platforms, unsuitable for streaming, or too difficult to get running.

    Like it or not, in the real world, rm is the ONLY format that will easily play on all the major platforms.

    Maybe if ogg theora or ogg tarkin ever get off the ground that will change, but given how ogg vorbis is still a niche player, despite it being a clearly superior and completely open/free format that has been out for quite a while, this seems incredibly unlikely.

  51. free RealPlayer link by elaineg · · Score: 1

    Yes - RealPlayer has always been free, and versions for Linux/UNIX, Mac, Windows, and Mobile devices here.

  52. Here's a suggested compromise by metamatic · · Score: 1

    Keep the codecs closed source but allow their use for decoding Real-encoded content to other formats.

    Last time I checked, this was explicitly not allowed by the license, which makes me suspect that the stuff about not owning all the IP is just a convenient smokescreen.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
  53. Please learn how to use links. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Please learn how to use links.
    <a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/guliverkli/" >Various players</a>
    <a href="http://emoney.al.ru/capture-streaming-video- and-audio/record-streaming-video-real-video.htm">H ow to Capture Streaming Real Video and Streaming Real Audio</a>
    <a href="http://all-streaming-media.com/record-video- stream/all-streaming-video-recording-software.htm" >Streaming video recording software</a>
    yields:
    Various players
    How to Capture Streaming Real Video and Streaming Real Audio
    Streaming video recording software
  54. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by dipipanone · · Score: 1

    Note: the link is NOT http://realone.com/download/realoneplayer_free.exe but rather a game to trick the average person into going somewhere they did not want to go.

    I've put up with some pretty crappy tricks from Real Networks over the years, but sneaking goatse and tubgirl links in to their employee's Slashdot posts is the absolute limit!

  55. Re:Helix Player milestone 2 by 31+Flavas · · Score: 1
    Does anyone think all the recent PR on slashdot in favor of Real (including quotes about having changed their ways and favorable comments from Helix community) is that much different from the clicky trickery just to download the player?

    What "clicky trickery"? Clicking on the "Free RealPlayer" link gives you an instant download.

    Sure, their past leaves much to be desired, but, at the very least, do not propigate no longer true facts.

  56. correction: Re:Call me a skeptic, but Real... by HiThere · · Score: 1

    Correction: Sorry, couldn't cancel the prior post, and didn't catch it on preview.
    And this means you should be trusted because?

    The player being open should mean that it will be very difficult for spyware to be snuck into it. So that's a plus. And I understand that you have abundant business reasons to maintain a monopoly over the
    server...damn, there's that word.

    I find it quite difficult to trust a monopoly, even in a small niche. There've been just too many examples of monopoly positions being abused. (Like every one I've heard of that's been looked at closely.)


    --

    I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  57. What do Real's own coders think? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Real basically has admitted that its own programmers are so completely inept that their only hope is to get some of the more naive members of the open-source to do the work for free.

    Any Real codemonkeys out there willing to defend their handiwork?