Slashdot Mirror


Review Of LinuxWorld 2004

jamienk writes "I went to the LinuxWorld convention at the Javits Center in NYC again this year. This is where the post-post-industrial corporate complex flexes for us consumers and infrastructure staff to see. And the smell of Corps was thick in the air. So was the nerdy, curious, driven, hacker odor. Guess which vibe won?"

127 comments

  1. Been there, done that by a+XOR+b+XOR+a+XOR+b · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I know all these journalism sites have to write stories about the supposedly big announcements and "new" technologies that come out at linux world, but to be honest there's exactly one reason I go year after year: Hanging out with the people there. It forges relationships that can be carried on well past the end of the convention. I'm glad all that desktop stuff was demoed, and I know it's important for the future of linux, but the best thing by far was making connections with like-minded geeks.

    --
    Anti-slash: In sacred jihad against slashdot
    1. Re:Been there, done that by KrispyKringle · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Really? I know the reason I go. One word: schwag.

      Let's see...free marshmallow sandwitches from Computer Associates (wtf?), a free T-Shirt from PogoLinux (don't think I'll wear that one anywhere except maybe to the gym), a Google pen, a HP water bottle, a Microsoft mini-radio (again, wtf?), a couple of BSD stickers, a few free CD's from Sun (Java Desktop System live-eval), and, if my luck holds out, maybe I'll win that Porsche from RedHat! :P

      I'm just bummed I didn't win one of the CA Tux scarves. Woulda kept me warm on the way home.

  2. comments on the crowd by theMerovingian · · Score: 3, Funny


    from article:
    They look like Nerds, but somehow lack the fear, the self-consciousness, and the "loser" qualities so often attributed to their kind.

    I'm not sure if that's a compliment, or not!

    --
    "If you think you have things under control, you're not going fast enough." --Mario Andretti
  3. What does linux world have in common by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    A guy in the FSF booth was saying ->What does Linux World have in common with a computer chip? -- each year it gets smaller!

  4. "scalability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    seems to include "middleware" "scalability" and other old, nebulous buzzwords.

    When did scalability become a buzzword?

    The author of this comes off as an elitist jackass.

    1. Re:"scalability" by jmlyle · · Score: 3, Informative
      buzzword n.
      1. A word or phrase connected with a specialized field or group that usually sounds important or technical and is used primarily to impress laypersons: Sensitivity is the buzzword in the beauty industry this fall (ADWEEK).
      2. A stylish or trendy word or phrase.

      Well, I guess the difference is that scalability is used to impress managers, not laypersons.
      --
      I have misplaced my pants.
    2. Re:"scalability" by metlin · · Score: 1

      The funny thing is that the fortune cookie at the bottom of my Slashdot page reads as

      buzzword, n: The fly in the ointment of computer literacy. :-p

    3. Re:"scalability" by dogsbreath · · Score: 1, Informative

      Yeah, no poop.

      My work life is predicated on all the motherhood issues of performance, sizing, architecture, availability, scalability, maintainability, operability etc. These certainly are not just meaningless buzz words, although they might seem that way to a poser.

      This guy is really judgemental. Sheesh.

    4. Re:"scalability" by kfg · · Score: 1

      When did scalability become a buzzword?

      The instant it became part of a "product" for "enterprise" with an "IT" department staffed by "engineers."

      I'd write more but I'd be in danger of flaming, since you come off as an egalitarian prick.

      I'm sure that was purely unintentional though.

      KFG

    5. Re:"scalability" by Trick · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It all depends how it's used, and why. Have you been subjected to any sales pitches lately? I have, and "scalability" is most definitely used as a meaningless buzzword much more often than I'd care to hear it.

    6. Re:"scalability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I know this guy, I went to school with him.

      The reason he can't stand developers being called engineers is because he got the biggest softhead degree one can get in an engineering school - "environmental policy".

    7. Re:"scalability" by Rostin · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Agree. If this guy patted himself on the back for being cool, confident, and un-fake any harder, he'd probably break his damned elbow. What he doesn't understand is that the lengths he has gone to to stroke his own ego have revealed the fact that he is just as sub-human as the stereotypes he is trying to poke other people into.

    8. Re:"scalability" by radish · · Score: 4, Informative

      But those are all perfectly useful words. You know how people make fun of us geeks because we make up all that jargon? (WIMP, GUI, IDE, SCSI, ATAPI, RS232, ...) Well we do it because we need words to describe the things we're talking about. Business is the same. "Enterprise" means something. It means a large company. "Engineer" is a good word for what I do, seeing as I have a degree in Software Engineering from an engineering university. I'm happy to be called an engineer. "Scalable" means something which can be expanded to handle more transactions per second, or more storage, or whatever, easily. That's not a common thing - I've worked on many older (and some newer) systems which certainly are NOT scalable. So using it as a differentiating factor when trying to sell me a product is GOOD. Of course, just telling me it's scalable isn't enough, but people sell cars by saying they're "comfortable", or "safe" or "ecnomical". There's no difference. It gets me kind of mad when I hear one bunch of smart people completely dissing another bunch of smart people just because they don't understand them, or think they're "better". It just shows you've got a closed mind and a serious superiority complex. Get over it. If it wasn't for big business paying the bills, there would be no software industry, and most /. ers would be working at McDonalds.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:"scalability" by maxpublic · · Score: 1

      It gets me kind of mad when I hear one bunch of smart people completely dissing another bunch of smart people just because they don't understand them

      You might have a point here, if middle management wasn't composed of fucking idiots. Phrases like 'enterprise management' are as close as these Darwinian pieces of flotsam ever get to true sentience, much less actual brilliance.

      The path to middle management isn't one of brains, but of how well you can suck the dick of the guy above you. Has been, always will be.

      Max

      --
      My god carries a hammer. Your god died nailed to a tree. Any questions?
    10. Re:"scalability" by jamienk · · Score: 1

      Most buzzwords have a real meaning: even "synergy" :) ... Sometimes though, marketing people use these words not to convey their meaning, but to try to create the illusion that they are talking about something that would be met with approval by someone who did know what they were talking about, when in fact, they themselves don't know what they mean to say.

      If it wasn't for big business paying the bills, there would be no software industry

      But Free software was emphatically not paid for by big business. In the same way, one could claim that "the best Literature was not paid for by big business."

    11. Re:"scalability" by kfg · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I don't work in the software industry. I never have. I don't expect I ever will. My first contract out of college was as head automotive engineer for a small outfit developing electric cars.

      I'm an entreprenuer. A businessman. I like business. I've got a copy of "The Art of Selling" right over there on my shelf, next to the Halliday & Resnick. But I grew up in a hard core marketing family (marketing development manager for GE Broadcasting Corporation) and have a finely tuned nose for the stink of hype. It isn't that I think I'm better, I just know when I'm being hustled. I've been the hustler.

      And you're absolutely right by making the comparison to the way cars are sold. I've been top management at a dealership specializing in exotics and collectables.

      Unfortunately that comparison makes my point. Not yours, "safe," "comfortable," and "economical" having little to no meaning within the context they are used when selling cars. Especially since cars are overtly dangerous, uncomfortable and damned expensive to purchase and own (possibly more expensive than your home even).

      All they do is make you, as you say, "happy" about the words and thus more inclined to buy the car.

      Yes, within certain contexts those words have real meaning. Outside of those contexts, like in a sales pitch, they are pure buzzword gobblegook designed explicitly to fleece the "mark" and make one's quota.

      By the way, have you read "Ogilvy on Advertising"? Brilliant man. Brilliant marketer. You don't pay attention to what he has to say at your company's peril.

      KFG

    12. Re:"scalability" by brassman · · Score: 1

      Two nice ladies from Ogilvy buttonholed me over in .org land, looking for a few words from a "Linux Lover" -- perhaps it was my Red Hat fedora that attracted them. Odd, I didn't see anyone else with one this year.

      --
      "Ain't no right way to do a wrong thing."
    13. Re:"scalability" by Justice8096 · · Score: 1

      I remember being in a bid creation meeting discussing pricing on a service contract for a very big company, and I told him that the product was scalable - then I showed him what it meant.
      It was very interesting to see him say "Wow! so that is what it means when I tell the customer that (name of product withheld) is scalable!".

    14. Re:"scalability" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Even if you don't understand some term, it doesn't mean all of them do. Anyway, middle management has to deal with a lot of shit the people below can't see. They have to live in between and it's not that easy.

      But I do agree with you that hierarchies belong to machines, not humans. But what can you do? When you have to be inside the system you dislike, then for fuck's sake, make the system work for you (so you stand at least a small chance of escaping).

      Also, get a date and stop working 50 hour weeks?

  5. Corps? by zonix · · Score: 4, Funny
    And the smell of Corps was thick in the air.

    Am I the only one who read that as corpses at first? :-)

    z
    --
    What would an EWOULDBLOCK block, if an EWOULDBLOCK could block would? -- me
    1. Re:Corps? by Limburgher · · Score: 1

      No. Sadly, no.

      --

      You are not the customer.

    2. Re:Corps? by Plug · · Score: 2, Funny

      Am I the only one, when given the link to the winning vibe, worried it might be something to do with this guy? :-)

    3. Re:Corps? by jonman_d · · Score: 1

      Actually, I read cops first. I guess the SCO suit, the RIAA, and the patriot act are all starting to mess with my mind...

    4. Re:Corps? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that may explain the "corpse" smell.

    5. Re:Corps? by FyRE666 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Am I the only one who read that as corpses at first? :-)

      Yeah, I thought it was a reference to the BSD booth too...

  6. ummm by zippo01 · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I can't afford to fly to a Linux Convention, i think they should do a live feed over the net so i can see all the nerds, and venders trying to sell to them.

    1. Re:ummm by Oen_Seneg · · Score: 1

      What about the freebies?

  7. great swag though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I walked out with a RH Enterprise 3.0 WS distro (thanks, RedHat), a SuSE SLES 8 developer edition, a SuSE 8 full distro (thanks SuSE), plus Fedora CDs for cow-orkers, 7 t shirts and a blanket. The Oracle / Linux installfest on wednesday night was fun: free food, free beer and free (proprietary and free) software (this I already pay for as an oracle customer, but it was still a nice gesture).
    Too bad that 10g db wasn't ready for prime time.

    I think I'll make the trip up to Boston next year.

    the Pogo Linux servers looked pretty sweet.

    I missed the BSD babes of previous years.

    Pd

    1. Re:great swag though by incom · · Score: 0

      "plus Fedora CDs for cow-orkers"

      That's not a very complimentary way to refer to your colleagues.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    2. Re:great swag though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I missed the BSD babes of previous years.

      Yeah it turns up that the feds have busted them for pedophilia.. the *BSD "chick" is like 9 years old

    3. Re:great swag though by kfg · · Score: 2, Funny

      Indeed. Here in the upstate NY/southern Vermont border region we have sensitivity to these matters and refer to them with respect as "Bovine-American Hominid Production Partners."

      KFG

    4. Re:great swag though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is a prime example of open source ethusiasts-slash-sample-killers that pollute enterprise gatherings for which companies pay pretty penny to exhibit at!

    5. Re:great swag though by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      BSD Babes?

      They hardly qualify as babes. They look like some geek coder's girlfriend dressed up in a devil/anime outfit. *yawn*

    6. Re:great swag though by boulding · · Score: 1

      Yes, lots of freebies. I came away with Xandros 2.0 Deluxe (Crossover Office license included), a lot of SuSE stuff (including the stuffed Gecko toy), many free CDs, and a Red Hat emblazoned with the word "Proof" (whatever that means). All this was free, but the best show item I had to pay for: Eric Raymond was tucked away on the sidelines to promote his book "The Art of Unix Programming" -- I picked up a copy and got him to sign it. Really cool show!

    7. Re:great swag though by negril · · Score: 1

      I'm new here and don't know if this is appropriate in this location. If not please forgive me and give me some direction. I'm trying to learn the name of a small company that is a supplier to Redhat that is prospering (on Redhat's coattails). I read about them in an article several months ago and failed to jot down the name. I'd appreicate any help - thanx in advance.

  8. Apache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It isn't called Apbache just as it isn't called WinAMP .

  9. Wasn't SCO there? by 91degrees · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm sure they would have loved the chance to pick a up lot of potential customers for their code licencing initiative. After all, surely everyone there was using their code.

    1. Re:Wasn't SCO there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking great! Please repost EVERYWHERE!

    2. Re:Wasn't SCO there? by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      SCO attending Linuxworld???

      I'd imagine there would be a brief flurry of activity, as a thousand or so geeks and gamers all opened up their cans of whoop-ass (with a neat "POP" sound), then a blast and a huge cloud of blood, like when the CyberDemonLord from the original DOOM exploded. We're talking instantaneous and total destruction.

      There'd be like, nothing left. Maybe a couple of pairs of blood-soaked penny loafers with argyle-socked ankles sticking up out of them, that's about it.

      Of course, then everyone would shrug and head over to the food court; nothing to see here! Move along...

      Did they REALLY show up? Did anything... INTERESTING happen?

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  10. Bleh by The+Goobla · · Score: 1

    Why dont people just admit it to themselve, stop calling them conventions, and call them "Malls that only last a few days."

    1. Re:Bleh by bluGill · · Score: 1

      Cause few people go to the mall to hang out with people from different geographical areas. I go to the mall with friends. I arrange to meet a few friends at the mall when the come to town (presumably for some other reason). When I go to a convention I don't know who all will be there, but I know we share an interest, so I will meet some new people.

      You can have a convention at a mall, but the atmosphere and expentation is different between malls and conventions.

      Typically you will not see too many talks at a mall. They might hire someone to get you in the door, but many people at the mall will have no interest. At a convention I might not be interested in a particular speach, but they are a part of the main event even if I don't go to any.

  11. First time @ LinuxWorld by Shant3030 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I went to LinuxWorld on Thursday and it was my first time... some thoughts.

    Good to see the large companies trying to get a piece of the linux pie.sigh Buzzwords were flying all over the place. Fed up, I started asking exhibitors at large companies for "scalable enterprise solutions". Most had answers! lol...

    The .org pavillion rocked. By far the most knowledgeable and friendly people in the place. Spoke to some of the good people at geekcorps, FSF and gentoo. One thing I will never understand... why were the people at LILUG playing that stupid dancing game? They looked like a bunch of fools.

    We sat in on a keynote Thursday afternoon, "The Impact of Open Standards on the Technology Industry". Absolutely useless. I was quiet amused at the people feverishly taking notes on very general topics.

    Good experience, learned alot and will probably attend next year.

    --
    100% Insightful
    1. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Dasaan · · Score: 1
      One thing I will never understand... why were the people at LILUG playing that stupid dancing game? They looked like a bunch of fools.
      Well my guess would be that they were having fun.

      Hell I laughed the first time I saw the game being played, but after trying out the mat I bought my little sister for her birthday I can see the appeal. The first few goes I kinda just stood there thinking "Shit I must look fucking stupid!" But then I got past that and started to enjoy it.

      It's basically an "each to their own" thing.
      --
      XP is basicly 98 with a lot more extra features to hunt down and disable. --Dram
    2. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      One thing I will never understand... why were the people at LILUG playing that stupid dancing game? They looked like a bunch of fools.

      Maybe because they don't give a f*** what people think of them? I don't mean to sound harsh, but who cares what they look like? You don't know any of them. It's amazing that in the USA, the land of equal opportunity and "freedom" that a bunch of people having fun can get such a comment for doing nothing else but having some innocent fun.

    3. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's becuase they're gay, and we cannot abide gays in the US. Fag.

    4. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Devil · · Score: 4, Informative

      We were not playing Dance Dance Revolution, we were playing PyDance, a from-scratch DDR lookalike that was written by one of the guys on our mailing list; it runs off a Linux box. It's just so well done that you thought it was regular DDR.

    5. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no one said that it was Dance Dance Revolution. They specifically called it "that stupid dancing game" which would apply to both ddr and pyddr.

      Anyway cheers. I thought it was fun watching the nerds dance.

    6. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Spoing · · Score: 1
      1. Fed up, I started asking exhibitors at large companies for "scalable enterprise solutions".

      Well -- all buzzwords aside -- most of it is, isn't it?

      --
      A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
    7. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by CaptainCarrot · · Score: 2, Interesting
      How was the .org Pavillion arranged?

      I first went to a LWE in San Jose back in 1998, I think. At that time, the pavillion was arranged as a group of reserved booth spaces surrounding a common area. It was a great setting for socializing, seeing what was going on among the genuine geeks, and just hanging out. (The free pinball and driving game helped too.) In later years, it devolved into a couple of rows of standard booths with aisles in the middle. There was no "common space", and the .org reps were more or less stuck in their booths with no real way of socializing among themselves, at least during hours. It was a much less congenial environment.

      I'm very much hoping they've gone back to the older arrangement.

      --
      And the brethren went away edified.
    8. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by linuxlesbian · · Score: 1

      pydance rocks; i am in love. thankyouthankyouthankyou

      (i played a couple games at the booth wednesday 3)

    9. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One thing I will never understand... why were the people at LILUG playing that stupid dancing game? They looked like a bunch of fools.

      Well for one thing PyDance wasn't even supposed to be in our booth but Brendan (one of the programmers) asked if he could share booth space and we were more than happy to do that. We have a couple of people in the group who are DDR fanatics. What better to get the lethargic geek some exercise. Besides Linux is about fun as much as it is about Enterprise solutions. You say this is your first Linux World, well it used to be a lot different. When SlashDot had their booth some years back there used to be all sorts of calamity. I seem to remember a guy with an accordian and Slashdot frisbee's flying all over the place. The shift to business is inevitable but it doesn't mean we have to throw out all of the fun.

      --
      J5
      LILUG Vice-President

    10. Re:First time @ LinuxWorld by kupojsin · · Score: 1

      yeah that was a big way over the top as im sure by now you've gotten about 200 replies on this that was not DDR but instead a amazing (if not better dupe called pyDance which MADE the table as far as im concerned. at least we werent sitting there spewing the same boring crap or giving away yet another pen ! Anyway the honorable thing might be to update your comment so you dont look so foolish but thats your call clarifying -jsin

  12. they're not even co-branded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    "Novel: SUSE is presented as completely separate from Novel, they're not even co-branded (yet?)."

    the SuSE standard edition CD set was a co-branded distro, including both Novell and SuSE software.
    If you install off of the UnitedLinux CD, its UnitedLinux. If you install off of the SuSE 1 CD, its Suse.

    UnitedLinux is dead, thanks to Darl.
    Maybe it will be revived after SCO (CalderaSCO) is dead.

    Having left the show with such a distro, I can fully state (evidence in hand) that his point is wrong.

    Pd

    1. Re:they're not even co-branded by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      drat. +5? I should have logged in.
      I lost my login when @home went under, never got a new one.

      Pd

    2. Re:they're not even co-branded by conway · · Score: 1

      And the Novell guys were giving out stuffed SuSe iguana toys!! How much more co-branded can you get? :)

  13. Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    The new GTKQTlib thing (where you can make GNOME applications use KDE dialog boxes, and save/print/open controls) can now be set to automatically make GNOME apps use KDE dialogs with no extra GNOME code. This should make it easy for distros to make GNOME apps integrate with KDE.

    This is worrying. Qt is a full-on GPL viral product. How does automatically linking it with the more liberal GNOME licensing work. TrollTech and KDE are up shit creek with licensing... GNOME allows you to use whatever license you like for apps, unlike Qt/KDE which requires a very expensive Qt license for that priveledg. Consequently TrollTech is getting slaughtered in the desktop market. This bit of underhandedness seems to be an attempt to muddy the license waters, and confuse the issue.

    1. Re:Worrying by metlin · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Stop trolling. What the hell has licensing got to do with this?

      This is more for the sake for portability and compatibility issues, thats all. Its a way for the user of one tool to be able to use another tool without having to really work hard at porting - the exact problem which users face when moving even between various platforms in MS (WinNT vs. Win98, etc).

      If I use app Foo on Gnome, I can use KFoo on KDE without too much trouble (K added for attitude ;). If anything, this is great.

    2. Re:Worrying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trolling. What the hell has licensing got to do with this?

      What has licensing got to do with development? You can't be serious... how would you like to find yourself suddenly in violation of the GPL because some KDE developer thought it was a good idea poison GNOME with Qt's licensing problems? When TrollTech releases Qt under the LGPL (but it'll never happen) we can really get to making sure that KDE doesn't get left behind by integrating the two desktops... but until then, this sort of cowboy liscensing does nothing but give Linux development a bad name with corporate lawyers.

    3. Re:Worrying by jamienk · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you're trolling or not, but as far as I can tell there is no licensing problem here. If someone builds a proprietary program on top of the LGPLed GTK+, they wouldn't be linking with the libqtgtk thing. As of now the documentation says you's have to explicitly change your source code to get the KDE integration, but I heard that they've made it so this isn't needed, that it's GPLed code that intercepts certain GTK+ calls.

  14. lol by theNote · · Score: 4, Funny


    The KDE people really impressed me. At one point one of them wanted to show me how you can write simple javascripts to create full KDE apps or dock applets. He didn't have it installed though, so he decided to download it from the net; there was a compatibility problem with the binary, so he pulled the code from CVS; he didn't want to wait for a long compile, so he decided to use the other processors on the LAN, but to do that he needed icecream; he pulled that from CVS... All this was done at a fast and furious pace, he had 10 or 12 shells running at the same time, was bouncing between them; other developers stuck their heads in: "which shell is patching...?" Development in action. It was cool.


    Just when I was ready to try linux again, I read this paragraph and remembered why I got rid of it last time.

    1. Re:lol by jamienk · · Score: 4, Informative

      Just when I was ready to try linux again, I read this paragraph and remembered why I got rid of it last time.

      To be fair, this was developer software under development, not something for your average desktop user. Here's more info.

    2. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, you can't help it if you're a big pussy I guess.

    3. Re:lol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And you can't help it that you'll never get any pussy because you're dealing with your binary incompatibilities.

  15. Ah, Linux is Growing Up... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and becoming another corporate niche.

    This sounds about right. There's money in it, so money-making corporations will treat it like any other revenue producer.

    Remember, the real longevity / profit in this market is assured by companies differentiating their offerings, which leads to locking in customers to products / services that competitors don't offer (can you say proprietary?).

    The profiles of the "enthusiasts" are kind of amusing. Those folk will eventually find themselves pushed off to the side with a, "Hey, thanks for making us a market. We'll tell you how often to pony up the next installment for Linux-related products / services." Just like Apple enthusiasts.

  16. I don't understand by Gerald · · Score: 1

    He appears to be bashing Microsoft because UNIX Services for Windows is faster than Cygwin. Pretty lame.

    1. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I agree, CygWin is a burning pile of rat feces. Fuck linux, Go Windows!!

    2. Re:I don't understand by jamienk · · Score: 1

      I didn't like how MS tried to appeal to me as an Open Source user/programmer. To a Linux enthusiast, it's not enough to say "It's faster." You have to say WHY it's faster. And if you say why it's faster, you have to let me ask even more questions. But at some point in this back-and-forth discussion, MS will say "I will not answer that question. It would not be in MS's interest." Oh.

      Sure, you are your Grannie are content to say "It's faster, therefore better, I don't care about the openness." But I'm a Linux enthusiast, and I want to discuss the coding possibilities, and I don't want to be limited by your company's bottom line.

    3. Re:I don't understand by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the irony is that they said it's faster because Cygwin is slowed down by making win32.dll calls. UNIX services doesn't. So they just said win32 is the cause of slowness on Windows.

  17. People forget by Unregistered · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That corps are necessary for widespread adoption of linux. Sure the people they send too these shows are worthless, but important stuff does cope from corps as well as individuals. So don't gete too down on the corps since we wouldn't have come this far without them.

  18. Rose-colored glasses by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Let the stuffed shirts and corporate bigwigs make money from the Free code. Let the pundits question what it will take for Linux to succeed on the Desktop. There is massive innovation in Linux userspace, driven by the same geeky joy that, in another era and in other fields is called "intellectual curiosity." That's what I see as the main force behind the Open Source movement; not corporate possibilities, as the LinuxWorld convention pretends, but brutal candor, mischievous smartness, self-mocking over-eagerness. The corporate successes of Linux are just the results of an overflow of energy, the excesses being mopped up. The hacker ethic is driving the corporations. We don't need them, but they need us.
    Umm ... OK.

    This guy's conclusion seems to be that LinuxWorld was overrun by corporations (read: evil) but that secretly the geeks were powering everything and they, in the long run, would "win out." Um -- huh?

    I mean, that might be a nice way to think about things, but how really is the open source world any different than any other scientific endeavor? You've got gigantic automobile manufacturers, aerospace companies, drug companies ... Boeing, Ford, Glaxo, Archer Daniels-Midland, whatever. Yes, these are "evil" corporations doing "evil" things, but a large proportion of what constitutes the products they sell came out of academic research. Weird guys with beards, in laboratories, doing things for the sake of "intellectual curiosity." People squirting things into petri dishes, people pointing lasers at things to see what happens. And then the corporations buy it all up and make money off of it.

    Does this surprise anyone?

    • Researchers research.
    • Tinkerers tinker.
    • Businesses make money.
    Aren't these pretty much the dictionary definitions, and hasn't that always been the case?

    Sorry, but it just kills me when Linux geeks seem to think they're creating some kind of cultural/scientific revolution that somehow dwarfs past endeavors like, oh, the Saturn 5 rocket. And that, because of their personal ethics, they're going to somehow escape The Way the World Is, unlike Einstein, or Stephen Hawking, or John Nash, or whomever.

    Nice world you must live in, buddy, but I'm not buying it.

    --
    Breakfast served all day!
    1. Re:Rose-colored glasses by jamienk · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Corporate technology companies have portrayed the computer as being driven by companies. Linux development has been driven by hackers. At Linux World, the corporations put their accomplishments and offerings front and center, but they still somehow get dwarfed by the independent developers, who are more creative, more excited, more genuine, and more fun. I have no problem with businesses making money, touting their wares, and spinning their services. But they are the less interesting side of the story, a predictable sideshow.

    2. Re:Rose-colored glasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I myself have often thought that there is a startling percentage of GNU/Linux users who do not understand the concept of Free Software or Open Source and as a result, decide that any company looking to utilize either idea as a evil entity. In my mind, it all comes back to people thinking free software equates to zero cost. And with that being the case, and the majority of GNU/Linux software being zero cost as well as free, it has been determined that only evil bastards try to make a living off free software. Thus the anti corporate zealot is born. In my mind these are people who just don't get it. There is nothing wrong with making money off the GNU/Linux platform. Now, if one were to place a patent on the code used in GNU/Linux that would be another story.

    3. Re:Rose-colored glasses by crazyphilman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hang on, be fair. If everyone brings their straw man to slashdot at the same time, the resulting fire could kill us all. It would only take one stoner to set off the conflagration, ok? You know those bongs throw sparks from time to time.

      Part of what you're saying is true. And part of what the other guy said was true. I think the TRUTH lies somewhere in the middle, like this:

      Corporations, and people who buy into that whole mindset/lifestyle, are pretty boring and soulless. All they think about is money, so whenever they latch onto something cool or interesting, the best they can do is fake it and try and squeeze a buck out of it. It's like this guy I know, let's call him "M". Back when I was on speaking terms with him, I used to tell him about ideas I'd had, little things I was working on at home. He would ALWAYS evaluate them based on whether they could be "monetized". I would argue, "but wait, you don't understand; this is cool, it's not about money, it's about having it, playing with it..." And he would make fun of me. He would call me a "techie weenie".

      Now, on the other hand, you have your true geeks, a group I consider myself a dyed-in-the-wool member of, albeit a moderate member. We do things because they're fun, although if there's money in it that DOES increase the fun a little bit. So, we'll build a system because it's interesting, or useful, or something we want but which we can't find anywhere. For example, I'm building myself a custom knowledge-management app because I'm tired of storing my source-code toolbox in a flat-file directory. Will there be money in it? Who knows? But it'll be USEFUL and FUN. Now, in contrast to the last guy, one of my friends, let's call him "D", heard a few of my ideas (the same ideas the other guy made fun of) and thought they were great. HE thought they should be done whether they make money or not, because it would be cool if they just EXISTED.

      And, THIS is the difference between corporate and geek. It has nothing to do with revolution, or who's going to "win" or any other thing of that nature. It's a basic difference in mindset which results in two entirely different worlds coexisting in the same space.

      The result of all this is that the vast majority of people are stuck with the boring, not particularly innovative stuff the corporations put out, and this isn't going to change, EVER. Because that's just how it is; boring people produce boring stuff for other boring people.

      Us geeks will ALWAYS have cooler, more interesting tech than the rest of the people out there because WE BUILD IT OURSELVES from nothing. We pull this stuff right out of our heads, you know? Eventually some of that stuff finds its way into corporate imaginations, such as they are, and regular people get their hands on a watered down version of it. Look at how Comp USA is selling a staid, boring, plastic-panel "modded" PC, but the REAL enthusiasts are making systems regular people couldn't even imagine exist.

      It's how it's supposed to be. Everybody relax; this is the nature of things, the form and structure of our world. Enjoy it.

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    4. Re:Rose-colored glasses by jaxom · · Score: 1

      As someone who attended LinuxWorld on behalf of my corporation, I can let you into a little secret: companies really want to run Linux; they just need the support and services around it before it can be deployed. When I talk to my CTO and CIO about the benefits of Linux, they listen and they agree that it is a cool thing. The problem historically was that I couldn't provide the same solution that I can with either a proprietary UNIX or Windows. This is now changing (although there are some hurdles).

      To the people who think that my attending LinuxWorld indicates something bad, you should definitely think again. It is precisely the adoption by large corporations that are going to make Linux succesful across the mainstream.

      -jax.

  19. 2nd or 3rd time by LinuxHam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    and it was but a mere shell of what it used to be.. at least I got to support the FSF by buying a nice-looking "Free Software/Free Society" t-shirt. Other than that, got the google pen and a good look at small displays that would be perfect for replacing my in-dash GPS display screen.. looking for one with multiple inputs. Oh, and I finally got a replacement Linux license plate. The one on my car now has "Compaq" in huge red letters on it, which isn't too cool as an IBM consultant. :) The new one has "OpenGroup" up there now.

    Oh, and my vote for the most mis-guided individuals who have no idea how to make the conversion to Linux-for-business: the VOIP people who ran their setup on a chipped X-Box. Are you kidding me, people??? You want a business to buy your product, and you power your display with a video game console? The coolness factor drops way the hell off when you're trying to sell VOIP solutions. Build a damn PC. Jeez.

    Anyone remember the IBM party in 2001? They rented out the whole upstairs, had an open bar, great music, a real BattleBots cage, and, well, an ice sculptor. But he cut out a damn fine Tux, too. THAT'S what I think of when I think about the days before the bust.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  20. Re:Cool ascii. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that true? I've always wondered about real-life trolling. Obviously it's not too hard to place a folded-up Goatse printout in someone's hand, but there must be other ways to have fun...

    Nice one, FTM.

  21. The convention this year was awsome I hope... by SirExar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm really looking foward to this year's HOPE conference. It seems everythings on the uprise in the computer sector to me. 2600 alaways throws a good party hope it happens again

  22. Accounting nerds... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At Linuxworld it seemed to me that there were alot more booths
    showing ACCOUNTING packages
    (and linux moves into the "mainstream" - whatever the hell that means) than in the past.
    (I wonder how many accountants read slashdot??)

    Is there an inverse relationship between TECH-COOL and Accounting?

    Why did he become an accountant?
    Because he didn't have the personality to be an actuary!

  23. M$ Swag by smartin · · Score: 1

    I was there on Thursday, dropped by the M$ booth hoping to see some ex-Softway employees. M$ was giving out a reasonably cool little fm radio thing. I avoid their software like the plague, but have to admit that a long time ago i got a decent lunch bag from them at a trade show (the only M$ product i've ever had that was worth anything). So I grabbed the radio. Unfortunately like most things Microsoft, when i got home i found out that it was junk, missing the little door that holds the batteries in. I guess they don't do QA on anything.

    --
    The difference between Canada and the USA is that in Canada healthcare is a right and gun ownership is a privilege.
    1. Re:M$ Swag by conway · · Score: 1
      Yeah, the little radio is utter crap. I got the same type for singing up for a Citibank credit card. So its leats its not a proprietary Microsoft piece of junk. :)

      BTW, in my opinion, the MS people looked pretty silly sitting there at _LINUX_ World, trying to show how you can get a unix shell under windows. Why?? *Shrug*

  24. Ulterior motives? by t0ny · · Score: 2, Funny
    but the best thing by far was making connections with like-minded geeks

    That, and hooking up with all the hot Linux groupies? Um, no.

    --

    Manipulate the moderator system! Mod someone as "overrated" today.

  25. The USA by bluGill · · Score: 1

    It's amazing that in the USA, the land of equal opportunity and "freedom" that a bunch of people having fun can get such a comment for doing nothing else but having some innocent fun.

    I think that the definition of freedom includes the freedom to make fun of people making a fool of themselves, as well as the freedom to make a fool of one's self. Not to mention doing both at once with some comments.

    I find it amazing that whatever culture you come from doesn't allow you to speak your mind [when you will look foolish for it] about others looking foolish.

  26. Relax Little Geeks, PHBs Like Me Loved It by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was there Wed. with Friends. Beyond the mandatory trip to The Gingerman for free-as-in *expensed to the company* beers, and the requisite downtown pub crawl, We had a good time at Javitts. The Novell "Red Carpet" demos were intriguing. The Red Hat girls made us feel right at home. Even the Sun and SGI folks had some decent products. i mean c'mon little penguins, you already knew almost everything about almost everything you were going to see there anyway. All this BS about parties and swag.... I remember a time when you guys actually wanted a "corporate presence" at this gig... S'matter? Don't like the IBM commercials????

  27. This writing makes my brain hurt. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I gave up after reading

    "I was at the LinuxWorld convention two years ago at the Javits Center in NYC. This one was bigger: more big companies, a bigger space, more people."

    So which had more attendees? 2004 or 2002?

  28. it was kinda strange actually by superfast-scooter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    it was my first linuxworld. im a reasonably new user of linux (started a few months ago.)
    now, i only went on the last day (boy was it freezing here.)
    i didnt know what to expect, i guess - but i sure expected a lot less corporate "types". most of the big names were out with their shiny new servers, and enterprise software (both not interesting to me.)

    the MS booth was as big as Redhat - and I noticed that everytime they clicked on anything a window with something on SCO would come up. they were promoting MS services for unix by saying it sits closer to the kernel, hence faster - unlike cygwin which being an app would have to go a few layers down. well, d-oh!! i wont even bother saying anything bout closed source here and how anyone could do what they did if we had the kernel cos well, they didnt seem like they were having a good time either.

    gentoo had a nice lot (maybe the goth chick had some to do with that...), and so did suse, sun and amd.

    i came back with lots of brochures and no freebies - maybe thats why i was disappointed. :)

    1. Re:it was kinda strange actually by ai · · Score: 1

      gentoo had a nice lot (maybe the goth chick had some to do with that...), and so did suse, sun and amd.

      As the official gentoo booth "goth chick", I take that as a compliment.

      Want to make your local goth chick happy? Install gentoo today!

  29. My impressions by felix9x · · Score: 1

    I totaly agree. For slashdoters the .org was the place to be.

    I noticed that the big corporations like to do the media presentation with some hired gun enthusiasticaly pronounsing the greatness of their products or services. I wondered who are these people who seat though all those boring presentations?

    Gentoo had a bunch of gentoo users the "chearleaders" intermixed with the developers. It made the project representation look a bit amaturish although the developers where on hand to answer any techincal questions.

    OpenACS and Mambo was presenting their content managment software. The local NYC linux user community was there, nyphp, lispnyc, and nylung and others were all there.

  30. My impressions by parkanoid · · Score: 3, Informative

    The AMD people were surprisingly clueless. I asked a few of them which socket a particular opteron system on display was using (Looked like it was 939), but most of them started mumbling "socket? what do you mean?", or worse. Some of the systems they had up were pretty cool though, like the dual opteron rackmounts with watercooling.
    The sun booth was another disappointment in terms of the staff. I wanted to see how reponsive the Sun Rays were, so I walked up to one of their public terminals and started looking around, starting a couple applications, etc. The nearby sales drone stood and glared at me, as if I was going to steal the bloody thing, the entire time (after asking "May I help you?" in that "What the fuck are you doing here, kid, get lost!" tone). I just walked away.
    Other corporate booths were similar; either the staff didn't know that much beyond their script, or they didn't want to talk to me, by the benefit of me being a high school student (i.e. a PFY). It's appropriate, I suppose, since I'm not going to be making any million-dollar purchases anytime soon, but still not cool. The IBM booth was a notable exception; one guy showed me GeoProbe, a very neat visualization system. The program had two sets of seismological data loaded from an oil field in England (several square kilometers), and it could be manipulated in real time in various ways. It was running under RHEL 3.0 on a prototype opteron with only 4GB of ram; pretty impressive, considering the complexity of the model. In the mainframe section, two engineers showed me the new zSeries servers, and explained how the hardware worked. Really cool guys (both the mainframe and GeoProbe people), knew their stuff and were really friendly. Otherwise, Oracle's grid seemed promising, but I wasn't able to get too many technical details.
    In the .ORG section we had the usual debian, BSD and Linuxboot people, fun to talk with as always. Didn't get a conversation going with the Gentoo or KDE guys, but the projects were still pretty interesting. EFF wasn't here this year, unfortunately, meant to buy some stickers.
    O'Reilly had a pretty good deal on books, 25% off and a free shirt (the shirts only lasted through the first half of the day). Honeynet gave a pretty interesting presentation in the back of the O'Reilly booth.
    There was also a robot rolling around the show floor, Sprocket (not sure of the spelling, it might have been different). It demonstrated pretty impressive speech recognition capabilities, talked to the presenters, made crude jokes and movie references. It seemed pretty capable of sustaining normal conversation and was able to recognize people based on their clothing (although it misinterpreted blue lettering on my t-shirt as a blue jacket). Unfortunately, I didn't get to talk to it for more than a couple of minutes.

  31. "Nice Bug" by noctrnl9 · · Score: 1
    This was my second LWNY and it was good for me because I was able to check out the reformation of the New York City BSD User Group (NYCBUG or "Nice Bug"

    I found it was great to talk to some Geograpic Information Systems firms there (since I am an Environmental Engineer). I was disapointed with some of the companies efforts to push me along on Friday Afternoon because they thought I was just a student looking foor a free stuffed TUX. I will be in the market for a cluster (once I have the money) so they just lost a sale.

    Since I am in the process of evangelizing the advantages of non-M$ Computing the contacts I made this past week will be helpful.

    I found it interesting to see Sun's efforts. I think their Java Desktop System was an interesting take on an old friend. Their new environment could be the best GUI around if they are able to optimize it.

    One thing:

    I love working on an OSS, but I think future Linux Worlds should try to make a better effort to attract end-users. I understand some companies might not want to be on the exibition floor if they are not going to increase sales, but the second you find out I am an end-user (not a developer/IT Manager/Purchase Order Manager) you should not give me polite push to the .org pavilion. I spent a lot of time updating my skills, and I plan to spend more time attempting to evangelizeing to people that migt attent future LWs (even in Boston) who might be in a position to make a large scale purchase.

    Look a how that other Bi-Annual IDG Conferences value end-users.

  32. SuSE == no ISO by gumpish · · Score: 1

    a SuSE 8 full distro (thanks SuSE)

    Seems a lot of people think highly of SuSE.

    I'd like to try their distro sometime. A shame they refuse (or can't due to licensing conflicts) to make their goods more readily available via ISO disc images.

    1. Re:SuSE == no ISO by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      I didn't like SUSE that much. They had weird utilities. I was a lot more comfortable with Slackware and Debian, which felt a lot more Linuxy, if that makes any sense. Red Hat used to be okay, but they got really weird and corporate a couple of years ago. Then their O/S distro got really slick and effective, and just as I started to like it, they killed off the home version with some weirdo "Fedora" move. Feh. Back to Slack and Debian! ;)

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
    2. Re:SuSE == no ISO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you want to install it without buying the CDs, try an FTP installation. It works really well, and if anything will be quicker because the full distribution is enormous, and with FTP you'll only be downloading the files you need.

  33. "from the Y2***-is-the-year-of-desktop-linux dept" by LeninZhiv · · Score: 2, Funny

    timothy, man, come on! /. editors need to have basic wildcard skills:

    2* already means "any year starting with 2"; for single-digit substitution use ?:
    2??? is the year of desktop linux.

    man bash | grep -A32 "Any character"

    And yes, desktop GNU/Linux is just around the corner :-)

  34. Check please! by jamesl · · Score: 1

    "As usual, the ".org Pavilion" was where everything interesting and fun was. Crowds of friendly, smart, kind-hearted people mulling around the back-corner, kindly paid for by corporate interests, a small bone thrown our way."

    Actually, the whole thing was paid for by the "corporate interests". It cost big bucks to rent the space for those big booths. You should say "Thank you, corporate interests."

  35. UNIX Services for Windows by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems odd that MS would hand out CD's of UNIX Services for Windows at a Linux show. Not that long ago MS was saying how the GPL is a "cancer" and yet they include GPL'ed software in their UNIX Services for Windows. I guess the GPL is OK if it helps the bottom line of MS and a "cancer" if it is any competition to them?

    --
    If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
    it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
  36. Gentoo... by FeeDBaCK · · Score: 1
    Gentoo was there in force, some of them were punk.

    I'm proud to have been one of those "punks", but I am sure he was referring to esammer and his wife. It was great meeting everyone who came by the booth and we all had a fun time. -- wolf31o2

    --
    wolf31o2 Developer, Gentoo Linux Games Team
    1. Re:Gentoo... by esammer · · Score: 1

      Represent, my Gentoo brethren. ...and, for the record, my wife and I are not punk, nor goth despite the reports. ;)

    2. Re:Gentoo... by weeve · · Score: 1

      heeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeey

      up the gentoo "punks"

  37. MS was once a company full of Punks and creatives by riversky · · Score: 1

    This is the evolution. Linux will create corporate millionaires and billionaires, and like Microsoft, someday will be the mega dominate OS. The next thing will be driven by the hackers and 'punks' all over again. I selected Linux because the money my consulting company saves in not paying MS licenses, (ie more profit for us and not Microsoft) helps go toward my second home purchase. This software is wonderful.

  38. Veh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Workstations aside SGI had the coolest baddest stuff there! Nice description of the best in show!

  39. Exchange alternatives by M'Barr · · Score: 1

    Anyone who went: were any of the newer Exchange alternatives shown? I know some of the groupware systems, but I'm looking for one that is outlook compatable and end user indistiguisable from Exchange. Prefereably for a low cost :-)

    1. Re:Exchange alternatives by Ed+Almos · · Score: 1

      Kroupware is your friend. I heard good things about it after a friend of mine went to a conference in the UK and saw a presentation on Kroupware by Bo Thorensen.

      Pity the name sucks.

      --
      The more corrupt the state, the more numerous the laws. - Tacitus, 56-120 A.D.
  40. How to take it back? by Martigan80 · · Score: 1

    It seems as if the who Corp. world has taken over the Convention and only given a little bit of space for the true geeks. Not like the days when people who had jobs would take a day off to bring everything there and show off their stuff. I miss those kind of conventions, more like a non-gaming LAN party these days. Any how I think it is good to go to these big shows and see what commercial "stuff" is around, but remember-that's not all Linux is about.

    --
    This SIG pulled due to lack of funding. (This damn war is costing too much!)
  41. sco? by bluewee · · Score: 1

    Was Sco there?

    --
    [blue] - The Ministry of Information approved this message...
  42. "Middleware" and "Enterprise" by James+Youngman · · Score: 1
    I'm positing this comment about the article here because the handling of apostrophes and quotes within the Nine Nines.org comment handling is all fubar. Anyway, the article says ...
    [mid-level managers]... fall back on corporate speak when addressing a crowd ("middleware," "enterprise").
    Perhaps the reviewer doesn't understand - middleware is real. It's an actual type of product, that does a genuinely useful job. The only synonymn for "middleware" that is really appropriate which I guess you wouldn't think is "corporate speak" is "glue", but these days it tends to understate the level of functionality in the middleware ("glue" was more appropriate when middleware was just stuff like basic Websphere MQ). I suppose that regular geeks just don't often come across middleware much because it doesn't do much for smaller (or home) installations. Middleware becomes important when you have to take a set of half a dozen applications and make them interoperate. The larger your organisation is, the more important middleware is. You can pay anywhere between $30,000 and $5,000,000 for a middleware system (just for the license, not including the cost of actually installing, customising and using it), so people are very careful about what they spend their money on.

    In fact, the jargon term for an organisation large enough to actually need middleware is - "enterprise". They're often not referred to as companies because (i) they may not be commercial organisations and (ii) they're often large enough to include several organisations that are large companies in their own right.

    So, perhaps the words "enterprise" and "middleware" seemed to the reviewer like vague corporate fluff words simply becuase they don't correspond to things in his/her world-view. However, they're real concepts and useful words.

    1. Re:"Middleware" and "Enterprise" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If "enterprise" and "middleware" are really real concepts and useful words, then how the hell did you spend 4 paragraphs and leave us with absolutely no information about what they are ?

      I mean, come on. Read your own post. An enterprise (which is called that because it might not commercial -- i.e., "enterprising" . . . whiskey tango foxtrot ?) is something that uses middleware. Middleware is something that is used by an organization bigger than you guys have seen (i.e., an enterprise). There is a single word of information in there: "glue".

      I am reminded of the sentence from William H. Whyte's "The Organization Man":

      This book is about the organization man. If the term is vague, it is because I can think of no other way to describe the people I am talking about. They are not the workers, nor are they the white-collar people in the usual, clerk sense of the word. These people only work for The Organization. The ones I am talking about belong to it as well. They are the ones of our middle class who have left home, spiritually as well as physically, to take the vows of organization life, and it is they who are the mind and soul of our great self-perpetuating institutions. Only a few are top managers or ever will be. In a system that makes such hazy terminology as "junior executive" psychologically necessary, they are of the staff as much as the line, and most are destined to live poised in a middle area that still awaits a satisfactory euphemism.

      The "satisfactory euphemism" that the world settled on, of course, was "Middle Management." It's an euphemism because the truth would be to call them "parasites, who once infesting a company can be got rid of only by bankruptcy." "Middleware" is a similarly an euphemism -- it's an euphemism for pointless spending done merely to increase the bureaucratic karma of a "Middle Manager."

  43. No pics? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No half-naked nerd pictures like they got from Autralian convention? *sigh*

  44. Mod parent troll. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mod parent troll.

  45. Re:"from the Y2***-is-the-year-of-desktop-linux de by named · · Score: 1

    Well, except that 2??? is at once more optimistic and realistic than 2*. 'Cause it's definitely not going to happen in year 2, or year 248, and I certainly hope it's not going to happen in 20482...

  46. Re:"from the Y2***-is-the-year-of-desktop-linux de by JudeanPeople'sFront · · Score: 1

    desktop GNU/Linux is just around the corner :-)

    Oh, yeah? How close?
    200[45]
    200[5-9]
    201[0-9]

    :)

  47. Red Hat Supplier ????? by negril · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know the name of a small tech company thats been prospering as a result of being a supplier to RedHat? I read about this company several months ago and failed to record their identity. Thanx for any help.