Slashdot Mirror


15-Mile Wi-Fi Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down

DarnComputers writes "5G Wireless (FGWC) announced that it has documented a long distance Wi-Fi shot of 15 miles at a throughput of 4Mbps upload and download speed. The shot was completed this last weekend, in a competitive Wi-Fi shootout at the Defcon convention in Las Vegas, Nev. There were many participants with both commercial-grade and homemade entries in a variety of categories at Defcon's first annual Wi-Fi shootout.http://home.earthlink.net/~wifi-shootout/"

79 comments

  1. Make that 24Km Wi-FI Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    I thought English measurements are banned on Slashdot now?

  2. Last weekend? by LinuxGeek · · Score: 5, Informative

    This story was posted last summer. Check the dates on the linked page...

    --

    Kindness is the language which the deaf can hear and the blind can see. - Mark Twain
    1. Re:Last weekend? by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 3, Funny

      Wow, it happened last year and we're only just reading about it on Slashdot?

      Is it me, or does someone have a real big problem with latency here? Perhaps Timothy needs to upgrade from narrowband just as badly as Taco does!

      --

      "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
    2. Re:Last weekend? by Manitcor · · Score: 1

      For a second there I thought the voice in my head actually won and I was seeing things now.

      Looks like we need our /. editors to RTFA

      --
      "Don't mess with him, he taunts the happy fun ball."
    3. Re:Last weekend? by VonSnaggle · · Score: 1

      There was even coverage on TechTV's ScreenSavers last November of the actual Wi-Fi shootout....

      Thanks to Patrick Norton...

      --
      if common sense was common, wouldn't everyone have it?
  3. That's cool by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    In my house, I'm able to shoot 54Mbps across 15ft of WiFi.

    It's not too shabby, and I don't get delayed on the 11Mbps Internet connection like I did before by my 10Mbps LAN card.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  4. CmdrTaco's Internet by SultanCemil · · Score: 3, Funny

    I guess this means Taco can get high speed internet access out in the boonies after all. (see earlier story)

    --
    Cemil.
    1. Re:CmdrTaco's Internet by kfg · · Score: 1

      So long as he moves to Nevada with a 40 mile line of sight, yeah. Outside of Ann Arbor line of sight is often described as "I'm touching it."

      KFG

  5. Formatting error on story synopsis by CdBee · · Score: 1

    The hyperlink pointing to the Earthlink page isn't working. This may be an attempt to save Earthlink's servers from a serious slashdotting, I suppose.

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  6. What chipsets did they use? by The+One+KEA · · Score: 4, Insightful

    It doesn't say anywhere what chipset they used for this shootout...

    Although 35 miles with 802.11 is pretty damn good, IMO - scroll to the bottom and have a look at the monster antenna they used.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    1. Re:What chipsets did they use? by Webmoth · · Score: 1

      "...scroll to the bottom and have a look at the monster antenna they used..."

      Will this hang off the USB port of my laptop OK?

      --
      Give me my freedom, and I'll take care of my own security, thank you.
  7. Last weekend ? or more like a few dozen Weekends ? by kbsingh · · Score: 5, Informative

    Defcon is usually end of summer kinda things... the 2004 Defcon is posted for July 30th - 4th Aug 2004.

    I remember looking at this story a while back - and the same page was linked. might be worth looking back on ./

  8. Only 15 miles? by Brymouse · · Score: 5, Interesting

    That's a good shot, but I have done 10.1, 22.65 and 19.3 mile links, with 99.9% uptime. I used Breezecom DS.11 radios and 24 DBi andrew/conifer antennas to accomplish it. The worst signal strength was -68 to -72 dbm on the 19 mile shot.

    It's not something that all that uncommon.

    1. Re:Only 15 miles? by yppiz · · Score: 2, Informative
      I think the winning team was shooting from their ~24db horn to a 5-8db omni. Not bad, especially considering their horn was a Home Depot special.

      --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    2. Re:Only 15 miles? by envelope · · Score: 1

      The other day my laptop was connecting to the campus Wi-fi, 12 to 15 miles away, using nothing but the built-in wireless card. Throughput was crappy though.

      --

      appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars
    3. Re:Only 15 miles? by rudeboy1 · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The breezecom system you use is a specialized point-to-point/point-to-multipoint bridge system. They're designed to go that far. Your overall throughput is probably about 1-2 megs, right? These guys were using a home wi-fi system that is not designed to go more than a few hundred feet. Amplifying a signal like that takes a pretty good amount of thought, especially to get those kinds of throughput figures. Amplifying and transmitting a signal of that nature is like trying to stretch a 1X1 icon to the size of your screen. It comes out all poixelated and fuzzy. Same with this. Those chipsets were not designed to deal with those distances. The article doesn't say anything about lag time, which I would assume to be considerable. They did this in the middle of Vegas, right? I would hate to see the signal to noise ratio in that area. That would make it SO much more interesting.

      --
      Raging in an online forum won't do anything for the world around you. To see change, you must take action.
    4. Re:Only 15 miles? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >Your overall throughput is probably >about 1-2 megs, right?

      LOL :/

    5. Re:Only 15 miles? by NateTech · · Score: 1

      The Breezecoms' are licensed radios, no? Higher allowable output power, bigger antennas = better range. Duh.

      If they're not licensed, I'm *sure* you stayed within the legal ERP limits, right? Out of respect for the licensed users of the bands used?

      --
      +++OK ATH
  9. Cardboard and tinfoil antennas by yppiz · · Score: 5, Informative
    I built a copy of the cardboard antenna that the winning team used at the core of their mongo-horn. It turns out that the design is quite robust (that is, even I can make it) and with just the amount of cardboard you'd get from two standard 16"x16" boxes, it's possible to make a 16db gain directional antenna.

    What 16db means in terms of wireless use is than instead of picking up 4 access points from a rooftop using Netstumbler, I saw 40 different access points, including the BAWRN public node over eight miles away (with clear line of sight but an enormous amount of clutter in the fresnel zone).

    I used this design from Seattlewireless.net

    I strongly recommended trying this as a project. It's easy and pretty cool.

    --Pat / zippy@cs.brandeis.edu

    1. Re:Cardboard and tinfoil antennas by Technician · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you need it for outdoors, I would recommend using the aluminum coated insulating sheeting that can be purchased at any good building supply. It's the plywood with metal coating. Using the metal tape the HVAC guys use to seal up seams in ductwork would work well for assembly and provide weather protection.

      Georga Pacific makes some. It's description from the website;
      GP Thermostat Radiant Barrier Sheathing enhances Plytanium plywood sheathing with a highly reflective aluminum foil. Thermostat Radiant Barrier Sheathing can reduce heat flow through the ceiling up to 50 percent and save up to 20 percent on cooling energy consumption in hot, sunny climates. (1) Best of all, it's made of Plytanium plywood, so you know it's strong and durable.


      http://www.gp.com/build/product.aspx?pname=Plyta ni um%e2%84%a2+Thermostat%e2%84%a2+Radiant+Barrier+Sh eathing&pid=1741&hierarchy=

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
  10. Earthlink Link. by MooKore+2004 · · Score: 0, Informative

    For those who dont want to copy and paste, here is a link
    http://home.earthlink.net/~wifi-shootout/

  11. Bad Porn Joke by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's just too bad they didn't have Peter North set up the WiFi access points...

  12. "Last week at Defcon" by ehintz · · Score: 4, Funny

    The link is so blazing fast that it actually slows down time, like Superman in the movie. That's why we all feel like Defcon was months ago. It was really last week.

    In related news, the shuttle was traveling at 18x the speed of light when it broke up... Really, cnn said so here, and everyone knows cnn is the epitome of clueful.

    --
    ehintz
    1. Re:"Last week at Defcon" by ch-chuck · · Score: 1

      the shuttle was traveling at 18x the speed of light

      Wow, that's bizarre, even for sloppy journalism. Everyone knows that Columbia couldn't go much more than warp 10 without Scotty in engineering pitching a fit.

      --
      try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    2. Re:"Last week at Defcon" by ehintz · · Score: 1

      Heh. Good point...

      --
      ehintz
    3. Re:"Last week at Defcon" by winse · · Score: 1

      well I'm sure that relative to .... well i guess probably there's no way an object could be traveling 18x the speed of light away from the shuttle. Nevermind

      --
      this sig is deprecated
  13. Legality? by d-ude · · Score: 5, Interesting

    No matter what, at least it has to be more legal than the 'key-down showdown' stuff that used to be popular on the CB radios. I saw a guy with a suburban that had like 6 alternators on some custom bracketry, the entire rear cargo area full of batteries, and two large coil antennas on the roof. He claimed that he had a different length of coax on one antenna so that by the time the signal from the rear antenna 'slammed into' (his words) the front antenna would start transmitting and it helped his performance. They usually sit people many miles away and whomever can be heard the loudest wins. Everyone transmits at once I guess. Craziness.

    Anyway i'm just wondering what the limits are for dB gain on a certain power level to keep within the legal limits. I have an Andrew 24dB gain dish for 2.4GHz and I wonder if I hooked it to my Lucent card if it would be a legal power level.

    1. Re:Legality? by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yep, point to point limit using a 100mW card is around 28dBi.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:Legality? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From http://www.qsl.net/n9zia/wireless/page12.html

      For point to point fixed networks, max EIRP is related to antenna gain and transmitter output power.

      For every 6db in antenna gain, you have to reduce output power by 1db.

  14. Re:Make that 24Km Wi-FI Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    wait dont u mean Kibimetres ????

  15. Not in Europe by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2

    100mW EIRP is the maximum.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  16. Re:Make that 24Km Wi-FI Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down by Space+cowboy · · Score: 1

    Only spatial ones apparently - temporal measurements can still be completely screwy, or maybe it's just that the error-bars on the measurement were +/- 6 months....

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  17. Wireless Homebrew Website by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is a website for homebrew/amateur radio related wireless experimenting. It covers the construction of homebrew amplifiers, antennas, receiving converters, etc. They also have path analysis and line-of-sight analysis CGI utilities.

    Green Bay Professional Packet Radio

  18. Antenna by Polkyb · · Score: 0

    Now that's what I CALL an antenna... I wonder how big the pringles are that come in one of those babys

    :-)

    --
    I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
  19. Re:Make that 24Km Wi-FI Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down by Polkyb · · Score: 2, Funny

    The metric system was the invention of the French. I'd quite happily revert back to the good old imperial system, if I had the choice

    Fortunately, I was at school when Metric was introduced, so, I can convert between the two without using many brain cycles

    --
    I've never shoed a horse, but I once told a donkey to piss off!
  20. Cheap by qmf · · Score: 1

    I spend all day in the office looking busy buy twiddling with my linksys antennas promising the boss a better signal. But now all I have to do is buy a load of metal pipes and some duct tape?

    --
    get crazy with the cheese wizz
    1. Re:Cheap by shaldannon · · Score: 4, Informative

      Dunno if this will help you, but Linksys has a signal booster for your Linksys wireless device. Pop the antennas off the existing one, pop them on the booster, connect the booster to the access point, and (according to Linksys), you're good to go.

      --


      What is your Slash Rating?
  21. Ahh the gold ole days... by devnullish · · Score: 0, Funny

    I remember when one had to was 32 miles to get to the library to look up information - uphill! Both ways! Now I have just to turn on my laptop with a frickin' huge antenna and look up information.

    Hrmmm, I wonder why we have such obesity issues. Got to admit, this would be fun with a Humvee downtown NY.

  22. actually by raz2 · · Score: 0

    But competing in the DefCon Wi-Fi Shootout was much different than setting up an antenna in your back yard, or on top of a friend's house.
    ... ok ...

    To get better line-of-sight, many contestants decided to hike up a mountain with all of their gear.
    There you go. After all, it wasn't that much of a difference from putting an antenna on a friend's house, it's just a little higher, which probably even means the rate of success you get is higher too.

    Furthermore, the conditions don't look all that bad, from what I can gather from the pictures on the site. It's very exciting, but I don't really think it's worth the prizemoney. 8)

    --


    -raz
    "I shoot troubles with a jackhammer"
  23. Uh... by danielrm26 · · Score: 1

    Last weekend at DefCon?

    (checking calendar)

    --
    dmiessler.com -- grep understanding knowledge
  24. Re:Do people really get excited about this? by devnullish · · Score: 0

    Well yes the technology concept is not new but lets face it. If you can get a rock solid 54Mbps connection anywhere on say a Sharp Zaurus SL-5500 or a Dell X5 or a
    Besides, then there is the it-can-be-done mentality. People want to push the limits of their technology to see if it can do it. If it can't then how can they make it to. It is all about going where no (wo)man has gone before. Remember, people thought about going to Mars long before Beagle 2, Spirit and the other nauseatingly named robot landed there - Gallileo even passed it (IIRC) but now we are getting down and dirty with the red earth - or would that be red mars :)

  25. Friends and foes in a radius of 14.8951 miles by armando_wall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm looking forward to when this kind of technology becomes more mainstream (and cheap).

    You will be able to "phone" your nearby friends (usually most of them) by using regular p2p netphone software and a Wi-Fi connection... why limiting to audio? Videomeeting software! Free-of-charge digital communications possible?

    Goodbye to those ZIP and CD-Rs and DVD-Rs, now you can upload your work from your home pc directly to your office desktop (maybe companies will have to implement stronger security measures).

    On the downside, I can see a new generation of viruses, trojans and worms "in the air".

    1. Re:Friends and foes in a radius of 14.8951 miles by aardwolf204 · · Score: 1

      Have you seen that new IBM commercial about WiFi? Couple guys sitting a bar/diner. One guy mentions how he sees people with laptops everywhere. Another guy goes on a short little rant about how it started as 1 hotspot and then grew to millions, and now theses billions of dollars flying around the air. "Watch your head".

      I give it a 4 out of 6. Yes my scale goes to 6. 6 is reserved for those IBM / Linux commercials with the "orphan boy who was adopted by the world"

      PS: My MythPC is down for repair, I'm just dealing with these 30 second annoyances for now. Would have missed these cool IBM Linux and Wireless commercials though. Maybe there should be a PVR filter for cool commercials :)

      --
      Im dreaming ofa big bndwdth, That can resist the /.crowd.May ur days b merry & bright & may al
  26. only 15miles and 4mbps ? that's nothing by RouterSlayer · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Way back in '99 when wi-fi was just coming out (barely), I setup a 19.2 mile shot and got 11 mbps out of it, with only 11ms ping time.

    this isn't news... and it's not even useful...

    btw that wi-fi setup I did is still running today!

    and didn't we see some recent stories on slashdot of wi-fi setups running more than 30 miles with decent through-put ?

    1. Re:only 15miles and 4mbps ? that's nothing by rosbif · · Score: 1

      ...only in '99
      I was working on a project in '89 (yes I do mean the eighties) that did 13klicks with spread-spectrum radio boxes - admittedly, this was prior to 802.11 standardisation and the interface was the size of a house brick.....but still

    2. Re:only 15miles and 4mbps ? that's nothing by ph43thon · · Score: 1

      well, back in 1889 my great grandaddy made his own homebrew bullhorn and managed to shout information that could be heard 34 miles away.. on a rainy day. Then I made a time machine and went back to 1779 and cloned cows! AND TRANSMITTED THEM OVER A DISTANCE OF 100MILES!!! ..so there

  27. What slashdot needs ... by The+AtomicPunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Is some form of punishment both for people that submit, and people that repost, duplicates.

    Especially in this case, when said submitter claims it's "last weekend" when in fact it occured last summer, and was all over Slashdot at the time.

  28. contest by austad · · Score: 1

    Is there some sort of "secret" contest going where people try to get the editors of Slashdot to post the oldest articles possible? Is this the new fad since goatse.cx is gone?

    What do I win?

    --
    Need Free Juniper/NetScreen Support? JuniperForum
  29. Re:Make that 24Km Wi-FI Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down by slashdotkevin · · Score: 1

    Why Metric or English, use the system that suits the situation, both have benefits for exaple take 1/3 of a meter vs 1/3 of a yard, which rounds? Most of the units (volt, time, ohm, lenght, mole) have nothing in common with either sytem.

  30. August - January to document it? by dspyder · · Score: 1

    Guess it took them since the competition ended (and the first story came out) to actually document their success???

    Still a cool accomplishment, especially considering I think the antennas had to be built then and there (or maybe the team just got lazy). Goes to show you what a little knowledge of efficient antenna designs can do for you.

    --Darren

  31. Tell Taco by borroff · · Score: 1

    Someone tell Cmdr. Taco before he signs the DirecWay contract.

  32. The Emperor has no clothes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Too bad the grand prize winner has no content on their website. Just a big black, blank page with some embedded proprietary binary file.

    http://www.anybrowser.org/campaign/

  33. Check the dates? by Veovis · · Score: 1

    I attend defcon and I assue you the defcon dates for 2004 are July 31, Aug 1, 2. Theres no way that this took place "last weekend" as the article says

  34. In other news... by schwaang · · Score: 2, Funny
    The entire frozen dinner section at a small convenience store near Las Vegas, NV mysteriously cooked itself at approximately 7:03PM.

    A special envoy of the Pope has been called in to investigate the possible miracle. Said one bystander, "I don't think it was, like, God or something because this chicken burrito is way overdone."

  35. Re:Make that 24Km Wi-FI Shot At 4 Mbps Up and Down by Tandoori+Haggis · · Score: 1

    I've got a 15 inch...

    er wait a minute...

    --
    My hyperlinks aren't worth the paper they're printed on.
  36. grrr by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And SBC can't seem to be able to get me more then 384kbps and I am only about a mile from their office.

  37. FRARS - 14Km + 30Km 802.11B link tests by Richard_L_James · · Score: 1

    Some useful technical information / photos in relation to extending WLAN links can be found on the FRARS WLAN website here.

  38. Interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Does anyone know how/where to find more info (url) which explains exactly how and what to do, to boost a wifi-signal?

    I would like to give it a try myself, but it would help if there was a step-by-step tutorial somewhere.

    Does anyone know?

  39. dupe and illegal by NateTech · · Score: 1
    This is a dupe article from quite some time ago, but...

    Why doesn't anyone ever point out that these guys/gals/idiots (and most other 802.11b antenna articles on Slashdot) are operating their transmitters illegally? You'd think folks like TechTV wouldn't sponsor illegal activity.

    There are ERP limits (Effective Radiated Power) for 802.11b under their FCC Part 15 licensing.

    No one seems to particularly care that there are legitimate licensed users in the 2.4 GHz band, I suppose.

    Follow the legal limits in Part 15, folks... or ask the FCC to change the laws. Doesn't seem like that difficult a request.

    I'd love to see the FCC show up at the next Wireless Shootout with a video camera and then start handing out $10,000 fines to all participants. Now THAT would be worthy of posting on /.

    Real "nerds" (since /. is supposedly for nerds) use licensed radios and measure their power output levels with spectrum analyzers and RF service monitors... and probably build the antenna array using an RF Network Analyzer, too. They don't duct tape together some chicken wire.

    They put up antennas like these.

    These hacks and their /. fans are just illegal wanna-bees.

    Of course, most /. techno-wanna-bee-idiots also use crappy RG-8 mini-foam coax to hook it all up with and let all the RF dissipate before it ever reaches the high gain antenna anyway...

    Lame "radio" article - As usual.

    Mod me Troll if you like. 802.11b "hackers" have zero idea what radio really is.

    --
    +++OK ATH
    1. Re:dupe and illegal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm just a hacker I guess. I built a 24 element array with beam forming network. My controller software performs successive interference cancellation to remove unwanted demods. Instead of taking RF to the antenna, I have the amplifiers/LNAs housed with the elements. Testing the noise level- my problem is that the spec. an noise floor limits us to -132dBm so that's all I can guarantee.

      Ok- I know what I'm doing, but there's always a bigger fish. Your post sounds very trite and I take exception to that.

    2. Re:dupe and illegal by NateTech · · Score: 1

      Excellent dude. Amazingly good for /. !

      Unless you're one of the people in the photos in the article though, I wasn't talkin' about YOU.

      Again... unless you're over the ERP limits. Then you're no better than ChickenBob the CB-radio boy with his "c'mon y'all and git it" "blower" under his front seat. Illegal is illegal.

      (And the legality is the #1 point I wanted to make, while yes... being trite, because it fits so well into /. culture!)

      Mod me Flamebait baby...

      (Nice work if you REALLY do that quality of stuff... but make sure it's legal. We have enough idiots out there doing illegal stuff with Part 15 devices and broken Part 15 devices creating enough SPEW on the bands to keep interference hunters busy for a lifetime at this point... I'm just sick of hearing spewed crap from my neighbor's consumer-grade devices all up and down the bands -- and knowing there is very little realistic way I can convince them they're illgal when they operate out of their bands and get them to turn them off... because they think spectrum is a free-for-all and "wireless" is cool. Such is life, but that doesn't mean I don't have a "operate legally or die" mentality. Illegal 802.11b operators fall into the same scumbucket as Internet spammers in my book. And up until recently the spammers weren't even breaking the law, while the illegally operated 802.11b idiots WERE -- but I'm sure the illegal 802.11b operators would say they're "better" moral people than spammers.)

      Kinda get where I'm coming from now?

      802.11b -- LEARN THE RULES AND ABIDE BY THEM, is what I say to all those who post silly articles about rediculous distance contests which must certainly be breaking the laws of physics if they're not breaking the laws of the land.

      --
      +++OK ATH