Slashdot Mirror


US Govt Makes Times New Roman 14 Official Font

pollux03 writes "According to ABC news, 'In an internal memorandum distributed on Wednesday, the department declared "Courier New 12" - the font and size decreed for US diplomatic documents for years - to be obsolete and unacceptable after February 1. "In response to many requests and with a view to making our written work easier to read, we are moving to a new standard font: 'Times New Roman 14'," said the memorandum. ' The report goes on to cite a few exceptions to the rule including official telegraphs."

67 of 811 comments (clear)

  1. Exceptions by Joe+U · · Score: 5, Funny

    There are only three exceptions to the draconian new typographical rules: telegrams, treaty materials prepared by the State Department's legal affairs office and documents drawn up for the president's signature, it said.

    As those will all be done in the MS Comic Font.

    1. Re:Exceptions by Drathus · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget about the "Super Secret" communications.

      'Encrypted "Super Secret" communications will be done with Wingdings 16'

    2. Re:Exceptions by Anonymous+Custard · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't forget about the "Super Secret" communications. 'Encrypted "Super Secret" communications will be done with Wingdings 16'

      This message is in violation of the DMCA for circumventing encryption techniques.

    3. Re:Exceptions by dasmegabyte · · Score: 4, Funny

      And all documents from the Department of Homeland Security should be formatted in 16 point "Spooky" font. Preferrably in red.

      --
      Hey freaks: now you're ju
    4. Re:Exceptions by Jim_Maryland · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think the color for DHS will be different depending on the document importance:

      Regular - Green

      Limited Distribution - Blue

      Post-It Notes - Yellow

      Secret - Orange

      Top Secret - Red

  2. Damn. by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I had my money on 20 point Dingbat.

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

    1. Re:Damn. by buckinm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Only if Dean gets elected.

      --
      This isn't any ordinary darkness. It's advanced darkness.
    2. Re:Damn. by Tassach · · Score: 5, Funny

      The 20 point dingbat, with any luck, will be voted out of office this November.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  3. Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by The+One+KEA · · Score: 3, Informative

    Instead of actually doing something useful, they sit around and argue over the right font to use.

    Dear God.

    --
    SCREW THE ADS! http://adblock.mozdev.org/ Proud user of teh Fox of Fire - Registered Linux User #289618
    1. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by badasscat · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Instead of actually doing something useful, they sit around and argue over the right font to use.

      And we sit around arguing over their arguments. Which is worse?

    2. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by Wateshay · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's a jobs program, to help out all of the unemployed fontographers, put out of work by the dot-com bust.

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    3. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The government uses a lot of OCR - more than you would believe. Standardizing on one exact font description makes it far easier to build an OCR engine optimized for speed and accuracy, which in turn saves time and taxpayer dollars. It doesn't seem that unreasonable.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    4. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by kippy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This was a memo, not a $3 million case study. Don't overreact just because it has to do with the government. I'll bet you anything this cost about an hour of someone's time and the cost of emailing their workers and handing out some paper copies.

      If you want to start bitching about where your tax money is going, do some research first.

    5. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by pointbeing · · Score: 5, Informative
      I work for the federal government. Since not every federal employee can be trusted not to use a magenta scribble font for official correspondence, there needs to be a standard.

      Sad, but true.

      Also, most large corporations have a standard font for official correspondence.

      --
      we see things not as as they are, but as we are.
      -- anais nin
    6. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by k98sven · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The government uses a lot of OCR - more than you would believe. Standardizing on one exact font description makes it far easier to build an OCR engine optimized for speed and accuracy, which in turn saves time and taxpayer dollars.

      Wait a second.. are you saying that the government is spending lots of time OCRing their own computer documents??

      Now that is a waste of time and money!

    7. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by lobsterGun · · Score: 5, Informative

      When I was in the military we were required to use a font called OCR-A. It was optimised for the OCR readers they had at the time (the late 80's early 90's). I was nearly 100% accurate when OCR'd - pretty good when you consider that we were OCRing text that was being produced by typewriters that had been in near constant use for 20 years.

      You can see an example of OCR-a it here.

    8. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by Wateshay · · Score: 3, Funny

      Interesting!?!?!?

      It's not Interesting. It was a freakin' joke!! Geez...

      Sorry for replying to my own post...

      --

      "If English was good enough for Jesus, it's good enough for everyone else."

    9. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by joebok · · Score: 3, Funny

      When my dad was in the Navy there was a cost-cutting initiative to reduce wasted paper. Somebody noticed that there was a lot of blank space around the edges of typed text and decided that the best way to reduce these margins was to use 8 x 10 1/2 inch paper.

      It was abandoned when they figured out the special sized paper was more expensive. My dad still has a ream of the stuff.

    10. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I agree with you in principle, but you have to understand that the one thing the US government is tremendously experienced with is moving around massive volumes of paper. They've spent 200 years building a huge infrastructure around the idea of paper trails.

      Now, in the last 10-15 years it's become reasonable to use electronic means to move around large amounts of data between normal sites - that is, those not custom-built around mainframe systems like the original ARPAnet. The government seems to be making strides toward adapting to the new technology, but you have to understand that those giant traditional paper distribution networks can't just be replaced overnight. I'm sure that there are a lot of instances where, at this exact moment in time, it's actually cheaper and more efficient for office "A" to transmit information to office "B" using paper as a carrier medium.

      Remember, "Rome" wasn't built in a day (Heh! An on-topic pun! Ain't I the clever one?). It'll take a while to remodel it to suit the current technology.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
    11. Re:Yeah, nice use of taxdollars. by Moraelin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      You've never had to talk with the customer's PHB about some program spec yet, have you?

      The tech stuff is easy. They just want the program to do everything _and_ the kitchen sink.

      But what really causes weeks or months of meetings is

      - "should the logo in the corner be exactly 120 pixels or 121 pixels?... no, wait, 119 pixels is just right."

      - Then the fonts which _must_ be 7 pixel Sevenet (or some other non-standard font which is guaranteed not to even be installed on someone's computer, when they point their browser at the site. Bonus points if it's a pain to read.)

      - And it all _must_ comply with some nighmarish corporate scheme that wasn't designed for the net to start with. Actual examples from actual projects I've worked on, include cyan on blue, and light orange on orange-ish yellow. Literally. I'm not making it up.

      - And all the text _must_ always be limited into a 491 pixel wide area, to look the same on everyone's screen as it does on the PHB's laptop, with whatever default non-maximized position his IE remained set as. (God forbid that someone who uses 1600x1200 be actually able to use all that area to read the text.)

      And so on and so forth. It's the stuff managers' dreams are made of. I'm guessing that if you stopped them from spending weeks debating the exact font size and exact logo size and hue, you'd suck all the fun out of management.

      So, well, given that the government's job _is_ to manage... now why am I not surprised? ;)

      --
      A polar bear is a cartesian bear after a coordinate transform.
  4. 14 point? by ed.han · · Score: 5, Interesting

    why so big? isn't 10 the default standard for most written communication?

    ed

    1. Re:14 point? by SILIZIUMM · · Score: 4, Funny

      Old guys don't see very well anymore.

    2. Re:14 point? by MarkGriz · · Score: 5, Funny

      "Re:14 point? why so big? isn't 10 the default standard for most written communication?"

      Most likely aggressive lobbying by the pulp and paper industry.

      --
      Beauty is in the eye of the beerholder.
    3. Re:14 point? by hankwang · · Score: 4, Informative
      12 points = 1 pica = 1/6 of an inch height, which I have often seen ignored.

      The point size of a font refers to the height of the ancient lead type, where every letter is sitting on a rectangular piece of lead. Some fonts are designed to never reach the borders of that rectangle, i.e. a parenthesis "(" in a 12-point font can actually be a bit less than 12 pt high. Only if a "(" is more than the specified 12pt, then something is really wrong.

      Furthermore, 12 points are NOT the same as 1/6 inch. There are actually 72.27 (American printer's) points in an inch, but someday, Adobe decided that for digital typesetting, a round number such as 72 points per inch was easier. (The number 72.27 pt/in is easy to remember, but that is pure coincidence. See point units.)

  5. Slow news day? by prisoner-of-enigma · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Not to be petty or anything, but just how slow of a news day does it have to be when a font change is considered newsworthy?

    --
    In the end they will lay their freedom at our feet and say to us, Make us your slaves, but feed us. - Fyodor Dostoyevsky
  6. Times New Roman? Yuck. by adamvjackson · · Score: 5, Funny

    I would think Verdana or Tahoma would be a much better solution. Times New Roman is SOOO Windows 3.1! :)

    1. Re:Times New Roman? Yuck. by Ilgaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      Verdana and Tahoma are screen fonts. Georgia, Times, Arial are print fonts.

  7. How appropriate by jxs2151 · · Score: 5, Funny
    "...are moving to a new standard font: 'Times New Roman..."

    How appropriate since we are apparently the New Rome .

  8. The real reason by ArcticPuppy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The word "Oil" is often misintepreted as "Weapons of Mass Destruction" when written in Courier New 12.

    1. Re:The real reason by Zeinfeld · · Score: 5, Funny
      The word "Oil" is often misintepreted as "Weapons of Mass Destruction" when written in Courier New 12.

      Ever wondered why the Bushies did not use the name 'Operation Iraqi Liberation'?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  9. Copyright? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Who owns the copyright to Times New Roman? Are there any licensing issues involved in this decision?

    1. Re:Copyright? by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Informative

      Times New Roman is owned by Monotype Corporation.

      There's a ``gentleman's agreement'' w/ Linotype Corporation which allows them to use / produce ``Times'' (For the backstory on this, look up an article published in the APHA's journal and Walter Tracy's wonderful book _Letters of Credit_).

      However, URW did a clone of Times (Nimbus Serif, I believe it's provided as), which they've since made freely available (see the link to this at www.tug.org) and which can be easily used in free systems such as TeX, and is readily installable w/ XFree86 so that one may use it w/ Linux, Gnome, KDE &c.

      For those who're curious on the specifics of typeface copyright &c., www.typeright.org is a good starting point.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  10. US State Department by mekkab · · Score: 4, Informative

    US State Department

    I guess RTFA is too much to ask on a slow news day.

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  11. Interesting... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 5, Insightful

    That they are going from a fixed-width font (courier) to a variable-width font (Times). Columns of numbers, etc. won't line up as nice with Times, especially if the people creating the documents don't know what they are doing.

    1. Re:Interesting... by mysticgoat · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, the change from fixed to proportional strikes me as the significant thing.

      It means that government employees who have to use a word processor are now going to have to learn how to do tab stops. And (Horrors!) maybe even tables. Many of these astute public servants-- secretaries to heads of departments and so forth-- have been abusing the spacebar for 10+ years.

      This is going to disrupt the work of a lot of staff. They'll be spending their time learning about left justified tabs, right justified tabs, and the strange behaviors of the mysterious decimal point tab. And some will be forced to learn how to insert rows and columns in tables, and even perhaps how to merge adjacent cells in a table. This is going to be very stressfull in some areas, and will cause some early retirements and probably some medical retirements. I ain't kidding. I've worked with a goodly cross section of these astute public servants, and I know about the limitations that are behind the bright smiles.

      The March Monthly Report On The SW Antarctic Penguin Census And Pollen Count will have to be rewritten from scratch rather than simply copying last month's file and changing the numbers. All businesses that rely on such reports from the US State Department should be advised that these may be late, due to unexpected technical problems with the computers.

      Noted in passing: IIRC, both Courier New and Times New Roman were introduced at the same time, as two of the three core fonts of TrueType, about 1991, as part of Widows 3.1 (maybe another geezer can confirm this). Both are native Windows fonts. (The third core font was Arial.)

      There is nothing particularly newer or more modern about TNR vs CN. Both are computer implementations of fonts that were developed to meet limitations of earlier technologies. Courier is a very open font that does not gum up quickly on the electric typewriters of the 1960s. Times is a complex font designed to retain readability at small sizes with newsprint stock and linotype machines, where smearing, dropouts, and voids frequently damaged the letterforms.

      It is always good to see that the US government is improving itself, and moving ahead with the Times.
      </rant>

  12. Telegrams? by illuminatedwax · · Score: 5, Funny
    There are only three exceptions to the draconian new typographical rules: telegrams

    Telegrams?! They still use telegrams? If so, where can I still send one from? I'm sure a telegram to a Senator might get more attention than a letter and certainly more than an email. Plus sending telegrams sounds cool.

    --Stephen

    --
    Did you ever notice that *nix doesn't even cover Linux?
  13. This just in. by jghiloni · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news, the US Government changes the official resolution of all desktops to 640x480, 256 colors.

  14. Language? by DaHat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and yet we still do not have an official language!

  15. More Modern by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Informative

    From the article: "a 'more modern' font."

    I'm sure glad they put "more modern" in quotes, as Times New Roman was introduced in 1932!

    -Peter

  16. Its a shame.. by naelurec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They should have used an open license font like Bitstream Vera. This would have given them the fixed spaced "Bitstream Vera Sans Mono" for tabular data, "Bitstream Vera Serif" for paragraph and "Bitstream Vera Sans" for headers, captions, etc. Simply beautiful and open. :)

  17. Re:Telegrams? by jfengel · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Believe it or not, Western Union.com. Mind you, it costs fifteen bucks. But it definitely makes an impact.

  18. They didn't choose a font! by Quila · · Score: 4, Insightful

    They chose the Times New Roman typeface at 14 point, consisting of the fonts regular, italic, bold and bold italic.

    A typeface could technically be a font if you only have one version of that typeface = the one font in it.

  19. Re:Telegrams? by tommck · · Score: 3, Funny

    Seems a little obsolescent.

    Or even obsolete! ;)

    --
    ---- It puts the lotion on its skin or else it gets the hose again. It does this whenever it's told.
  20. Re:Telegrams? by Chris+Burke · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can think of something you can send your Congresscritter from WesternUnion.com that would have almost certainly have a greater impact than a telegram.

    Convenient that it lets you send both!

    --

    The enemies of Democracy are
  21. Re:Telegrams? by Chagatai · · Score: 4, Funny
    Telegrams would also have more of an impact because of the use of "STOP" to terminate lines of messages.

    Dear Senator. STOP.
    Please consider the following things that should be changed. STOP.
    -The RIAA. STOP.
    -Microsoft. STOP.
    -The war in Iraq. STOP.
    -The Patriot Act. STOP. No, stop. STOP. I mean seriously, stop it now. STOP.

    --
    --Chag
  22. And in Related News... by fuzzybunny · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...the department of homeland security recently adopted Zapf Dingbats as its official font.

    Should clear up their communiques a bit.

    --
    Cole's Law: Thinly sliced cabbage
  23. Not Garamond? by MuParadigm · · Score: 5, Funny


    Times New Roman instead Garamond? What were those aesthetically clueless dingbats thinking?

    That's it. I've completely lost faith in our government, and political processes in general. If they can't ascertain Garamond's clear superiority to TNR, well, they'll just have to impeached, that's all.

    And sent for serious rehabilitation. And re-training, with those methods used for de-programming cult victims.

    I mean, seriously, TNR over Garamond? I ask you...

    1. Re:Not Garamond? by WillAdams · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Unfortunately, Garamond isn't readily available to all systems the government is likely to be purchasing / using, so the choice of Times New Roman (a Windows core font, and available on all Macs which have Internet Explorer installed) makes good fiscal sense.

      William

      --
      Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
    2. Re:Not Garamond? by MuParadigm · · Score: 3, Funny


      People have to *read* these documents! Subjecting them to the ugliness, the aesthetic horror, that is Times New Roman, is either depravity or at the very least, an incidence of putting pennies before dollars. What will the medical costs be of subjecting the world to Times New Roman simply to save a few cents in producing government documents?

      This is an outrage, I tell you! Think of the children!

  24. 10 Point Falisy by Genady · · Score: 5, Informative

    See here's the problem. 10 point at 96 DPI and 10 point at 72 DPI *SHOULD* be the same thing, point does *NOT* equal pixel, that's a common fallicy propogated by Microsoft. Points are Points, there are 72 of them in an inch. Points are NOT pixels!

    So to answer your question. No, 12 point is the accepted standard for most communication. Unfortunately since the majority of computers in the world render points incorrectly '10 point' has become a defacto, and typographically incorrect, standard.

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
  25. Government Forcasts 30% Increase in Paper Use by stuffduff · · Score: 3, Insightful
    George W. Bush is expected to announce shortly the Timber Reclamation Act of 2004 in which all wood framed houses will be demolished and the lumber reclaimed and recycled to produce "Goverment Bond" in an effort to avoid a predicted paper shortfall for government documents.

    "I want to make it perfectly clear to every one in the world that just because I'm shortsighted does not mean that I can afford not to be misudnerstood."

    --
    "Can there be a Klein bottle that is an efficient and effective beer pitcher?"
  26. You do know what this means? by azaris · · Score: 3, Funny

    No more ASCII art in official US government memos.

  27. One thing that they forgot to mention... by WIAKywbfatw · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is that all US government reports now have to have to be accompanied by "the correct cover sheet". Oh, and all White House press conferences must have at least "fifteen pieces of flair".

    --

    "Accept that some days you are the pigeon, and some days you are the statue." - David Brent, Wernham Hogg
  28. i was ahead of my time, when i worked for DoD!! by pezpunk · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "In response to many requests and with a view to making our written work easier to read, we are moving to a new standard font: 'Times New Roman 14'," said the memorandum.

    this is pretty amazing. back 13 years ago in 1991 i was working for the Army Materiel Command Headquarters and i repeatedly got a "talking to" from my bosses for using Times instead of Courier in official correspondence to other departments. i then went to the head of AMC HQ and suggested a change in policy to allow Times New Roman to also be acceptable, since we were now in the computer age, and not limited to typewriters and daisy-wheel printers, and since Times New Roman was demonstrably easier to read, and more attractive. He took my request to the Chief of Staff of the Army, who shot it down.

    i was ahead of my time!

    --
    i could live a little longer in this prison
    1. Re:i was ahead of my time, when i worked for DoD!! by tverbeek · · Score: 4, Funny

      How did he respond to your suggestion that lowercase letters at the beginning of sentences and for the pronoun "I" should be acceptable?

      --
      http://alternatives.rzero.com/
  29. Dubya by hellfire · · Score: 4, Funny

    The 20 point dingbat is actually running the country, so maybe you should collect on your bet.

    --

    "All great wisdom is contained in .signature files"

    1. Re:Dubya by DAldredge · · Score: 3, Funny

      It isn't smart to talk about Karl Rove like that!

  30. Re:Resistance is futile. by byolinux · · Score: 3, Funny

    In 12pt Courier New, War Was Beginning...

    What happen!!

    Someone set us up the Times!!

    What!!

    We get bigger!!

    New Font Turn on!!

    It's Huge!!

    How are you gentlemen!!
    All your document are belong to us!!
    You have no chance to survive, make your change!!

  31. As a person with poor eyesight.. by haggar · · Score: 4, Interesting

    (and before I get trolled: no, I can't correct it with glasses)

    I have had problems reading small font text for at least 10 years now, and the problem is, of course, getting worse. But I have learned a lot, about the needs of visually impaired people. One of these things is that Verdana is probably the ideal font for us. This fact was discussed in depth on the nystagmus newsgroup, and the good thing is, we all reached a consensus about Verdana.

    I am surprised so few companies use it. Actually, none as far as I know. I am surprised mostly because I believe that a nice, readable font is pleasant even for the healthy eye, it's more ergonomic.

    --
    Sigged!
    1. Re:As a person with poor eyesight.. by notchcode · · Score: 3, Informative
      Verdana is a great face, esp. for use on-screen, as it was designed for that use by Matthew Carter in 1996. I am not a fan of it in print, because so many other great, easily-accessible faces are already available that are so similar. Take Franklin Gothic, for example.

      For lots of text-on-paper reading, serifed faces are easier on the eyes, so I can see the arguement for Times. Times, though, was intended for newspaper use (hence the name), not long reports that run in wide columns...AS I've said elsewhere, I think something softer and rounder, like Bembo would have been a better choice. FWIW, I specify Verdana in all my site designs, because it's the best web-specific face out there. A lot of my designer geek pals do, too.

  32. Re:Standard points or Microsoft points? by WillAdams · · Score: 3, Informative

    Actually, no, a point isn't / wasn't always 1/72nd of an inch.

    That was set by John Warnock (you may know him better as the founder of Adobe Systems) when he wrote a little program called PostScript. He chose to do this for efficiency's sake since he knew all fonts would have to be re-created for use in his system.

    Prior to that there were two different types of points, English points (72.27 to an inch) and Cicero / Didot points (some funny number to a meter).

    So, when one specs points in publishing, one should always ascertain whether one means the DTP point (72 to an inch), or Printer's points or something else.

    The original Mac OS set the screen dpi to be 72 pixels per inch, but Apple hasn't made a screen which matches that for a long while AFAIK. Windows sets the default logical screen dpi to 96 by default, but allows one to change it. Unfortunately a lot of programs are Mac ports which are hard-wired to 72 dpi, so it's actually better to set to that.

    For those who need more on this, I'd suggest www.schaedler-rulers.com --- also look up Victor Eijkhout's spiffy TeX ruler (should be on CTAN).

    William

    --
    Sphinx of black quartz, judge my vow.
  33. Re:Once againe, SCO set the standard... by tiger99 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Much as I would like to, even I can't actually find any way to blame SCO for this font change. I can't blame Sir Bill either. But, I think it is stupid, because 14 point is a bit too big and so wastes paper, not that the US government ever cared about waste.....

    In any case, there are more visually pleasing fonts, and I see no reason why official documents should not look good. Some organisations use their own custom font, I would have thought that the US government could afford to pay for a real expert to come up with a good one, which might also be more readable by the visually challenged.

  34. Re:Once againe, SCO set the standard... by mikerich · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Much as I would like to, even I can't actually find any way to blame SCO for this font change. I can't blame Sir Bill either. But, I think it is stupid, because 14 point is a bit too big and so wastes paper, not that the US government ever cared about waste.....

    And just think of the endless committees, sub-committees, working groups, focus groups, font lobbyists, R and D, marketing and strategising people that were involved. There were probably millions spent on deciding whether they should go for the relaxed 12 point, or the more dynamic and assertive 'hell we're a superpower' 14 point approach.

    I hear they're working on rebranding the bald eagle for the 21st Century, apparently the existing bird just isn't - well - [makes feeble hand gestures] swooping enough for today's time-poor, internet-rich, xboxed, click-to-continue, frappacino generation.

    Best wishes,
    Mike.

  35. Re:Once againe, SCO set the standard... by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 4, Informative

    Test it out, loud mouth.

    Open a new Word (or other word processor of choice) document and paste in multiple pages of text and format it all as Courier New 12 pt. Print it out.

    Now convert it all to Times New Roman 14 pt and print it out. How many pages compared to Courier? The same or less, I'll bet you find.

    Courier New is a monospaced font, you can fit a fixed number of characters per line, whether they are all i's or m's.

    Times New Roman is properly kerned so that you can fit more characters per line as each character takes up only as much space as it needs.

    It sounds like 14 pt would take up more space, and if you stay within one typestyle you would be correct, but Courier New is not space efficient so you actually do gain back more space and make it easier to read large blocks of text.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  36. Re:Once againe, SCO set the standard... by sg3000 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    > there are more visually pleasing fonts, and I see no reason
    > why official documents should not look good.

    Yes, there are more pleasing fonts, but don't let untalented people come any where close to them. Give them Times New Roman and delete all the other fonts from their computers.

    At my company, Futura is our corporate branded sans serif, with New Century Schoolbook used for serif work. However, only about 10% of the corporate population can deal with this. We've got people who produce hundreds of pages of Futura text (where its sans serif nature makes the document an eyestrain to read). We've got people who can't tell the difference between Futura, MS Comic Sans, and Arial. We've got people who will mix Futura and Times New Roman in the same freaking sentence. I once saw a marketing person (who should have known better) try to use Zapf Chancery (an abomination) in all caps all over a presentation for a trade show, before he was smacked upside the head.

    I can't imagine our Federal government is any better. So, if settling on Times New Roman is the way to prevent font atrocities, then so be it.

    Sheesh. The only way I can keep from exploding like this at work is to read Kibo's pages on this.

    --
    Insert simplistic political, ideological, or personal proselytization here.
  37. The ink lobbyists by Zevets · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think you just realized the real motive. The ink lobby has "donated to the president". Everyone knows how expensive ink cartridges are(or laser). Open Open Office (pun intended) and type something. You will see that the end number of pages is the same, but that Times New Roman 14 uses wider parts of letters (total width same including spacing). You will need to open it up to see what I mean. This will cost the governement millions paying for these extra cartridges. Fear the Ink Lobby!

    --

    Mod Wisely.

  38. fucking aweful title... US doesn't "Ban" anything by kaltkalt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    An administrative office in the US gov't decided to use a different font. Not only is this not news, but for them to frame it as "US Bans old font" is downright misleading and dispicable. Pretty much every office I've ever worked for has had a standard font. The Dept. of State decided to change fonts--and to a much more eye-pleasing one, I might add. Nobody is going to jail for using Courier Font in the USA. Not even a fine. This is basically just a "TPS Report" saying how they're gonna do the cover sheets from now on... new font. No big fucking deal. The USA has not banned any fonts. If you work for the Dept of State, start using Times new Roman. Shoulda been using it years ago anyway. Of course, if the title of the story had been "State Department Chooses New Font" the editors would have laughed the reporter out of the office... so it had to be more dramatic. "US bans..." ... yeh we've banned lots of stupid things that shouldn't be banned, but fonts are not yet one of them.

    --

    Stupid people make stupid things profitable.