Slashdot Mirror


Shuttle XPC Linux Network Appliance

NoPants writes "Another big name looks like it's going to shack up with Linux. Shuttle, the maker of those small little cube looking PCs, is adopting Mandrake Linux with their newest network appliance XPCs. You can check out a review of the machine at Sudhian."

186 comments

  1. not news by Gherald · · Score: 4, Informative

    Shuttle has bundled Mandrake with it's barebones and motherboards for a long time now.

    1. Re:not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >>One world, One web, One program - Microsoft Ad
      >>Ein Volk, Ein Reich, Ein Fuhrer - Adolf Hitler

      with a sig like that....newsgroup threads that you participate in don't grow very long, do they? ;-)

    2. Re:not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lol, well I don't usenet enough to bother having a sig there, but if I did then I suppose it would be a problem :)

    3. Re:not news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shuttle told me at CES that they dropped Mandrake. They told me it was a "very bad experince."

  2. "small little cube looking PCs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    And not to be confused with those large, big cube looking ones.

    1. Re:"small little cube looking PCs" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course not, those large big cubes are soley the domain of M$.

      Just check out their /.logo (borg gates) if you need proof...

    2. Re:"small little cube looking PCs" by TrevorB · · Score: 1

      What, like the IBM Netfinity 5500 I have at home as my server? It's about 2.5 feet x 2.5 feet x 3 feet. It was a christmas present after the 3 year warranty expired.

      123 pounds of Linuxy goodness... :) Hell to get upstairs though.

  3. The installation review is really impressive by plover · · Score: 5, Informative
    Skip the review of the Shuttle appliance for now. The reviewer perfomed a click-by-click installation review of both Mandrake 9.2 and Windows XP on the machine.

    Bottom line: Mandrake was easier and faster to install than XP. It had just as many pretty pictures, and it required less knowledge on the part of the user regarding networking, hardware, etc. It took 40 minutes instead of 50, and required only one reboot as opposed to the nine+ required to install XP. And when it was done, the reviewer had far more applications ready to run installed on the machine.

    His conclusion was that Linux is indeed ready for the desktop.

    --
    John
    1. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      My co-worker was plenty impressed with Mandrake 9.2 until he tried to rename CDROM1 and CDROM2 to DVD and CD_WRITER. Thats when Mandrake started self-destructing. Its not a very robust system. Very easy to break if you try to deviate at all from the standard install.

      He went right back to Windows XP. Too bad... ;-(

    2. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Phillup · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the rundown... their slow server made it impossible to read the article before reading all the comments.

      --

      --Phillip

      Can you say BIRTH TAX
    3. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I had always ranted to anyone who would listen about how many times one had to reboot Windows (in my case, win98) during/after installation. Oh I've found new hardware, let's reboot! Same song and dance for a network card, a USB mouse, the sound card, a video card, the webcam, etc. Then it's installing MS Office which requires at least another reboot, if not two.

      My install of RH9 took a few minutes and one reboot -- after which I've got my devices working (yeah yeah, issues with Linux hardware support but if you're careful, everything is supported out of the "box"), have most of the software I need, and am pretty much ready to go. Then you install APT, run the update/upgrade, and maybe reboot again just for fun.

      For a base install (without the extra tweaks), RH9 seems to be more convenient. In all cases, though, especially for updates, broadband comes in very handy.

    4. Re:The installation review is really impressive by adamshelley · · Score: 0

      50 minutes to install XP maybe if you have a custom image of XP including all of the service packs / hot fixes. If you have to download all of these and install them add at least an hour + another 10 reboots.

      XP is weak.

    5. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i just built a shuttle sb75g2 last week. 3.2 p4 1gig corsair. wd raptor. win xp pro took 20 minutes with one reboot.

    6. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Maybe renaming and creating symbolic links to the new names may have fixed it? Just a random guess. Unfortunately it's too late now, eh?

      Ask the poor guy to rename "Program Files" to "stuff_to_run" or something like that and see how XP handles it. Slippery slope, but c'mon, renaming folders is just about equivalent to renaming your drives in Linux. There are hooks tied to those names (LSB, maybe?) and when you suddenly switch to a name the machine doesn't expect, things go wrong. No different in Windows.

    7. Re:The installation review is really impressive by mm0mm · · Score: 5, Funny

      I had always ranted to anyone who would listen about how many times one had to reboot Windows

      Reboot is one of the biggest annoyances that made me switch to Linux. I can't tell you how many times Windows reboot interrupted my downloading ISO images from alt.binaries.vcd.xxx. Now I'm so glad I switched to Linux and understand why people are so fond of it.

    8. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Helter · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hmmmm, I've installed windows 2000 and XP dozens of times, only one reboot needed.

    9. Re:The installation review is really impressive by cdc179 · · Score: 1

      One thing you are forgetting:
      For the M$ install the time didn't include partitioning and for Mandrake it did, so instead of it being 10 mins faster it's more like 15-20

    10. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Then you had to install software onto it, which must have needed a reboot. Then those update patches require at least one more reboot, if not 5.

      Only rebooted the machine once? Wow. Sure, one reboot is all you need. Now hook it up to the interweb and let's see uptime at its finest...or at least post their IP addys to have a few script kiddies reboot your machines for you. :)

    11. Re:The installation review is really impressive by starm_ · · Score: 1

      He's right. Its very easy to break Mandrake's GUI tools. I expect these things will be fixed in a year or two and Linux will then be a very good desktop.

    12. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 1

      My girlfriend was impressed with Mac OS X until she renamed /home/atr/ (her initials) to /home/alli/ (her name).

      Mac OS X didn't like that so much. She stuck with Mac OS X. Maybe every OS needs to telepathically interpret your desires, or maybe your coworker is the problem. Sure, maybe Mandrake should have prevented him from easily changing those names if it was going to be destructive.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    13. Re:The installation review is really impressive by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You're not counting the time required to install chipset drivers, updated video drivers, updated sound drivers, etc.

    14. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ummmm, soooooo, uhhh...which Linux newsreader client do you recommend?

    15. Re:The installation review is really impressive by incom · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I'm surprised Mandrake lets normal users do this operation. If he did this as root, then he deserves breakage, only use root if you know what your doing, you'd breakage get on XP if you were to rename a windows system folder or file, or mess around blindly in the registry.

      --
      True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
    16. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Dalcius · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Personally, for me, it's control.

      I'm running Gentoo Linux and there is nothing, not a single package, not a single service installed on my system that I didn't instruct my system to install or was required to boot the machine to a stripped command line.

      Each distro is a bit different, but that choice does wonders for the computing experience. For me, my setup fits my computing style like a glove.

      Cheers

      --
      ~Dalcius
      Rome wasn't burnt in a day.
    17. Re:The installation review is really impressive by SoTuA · · Score: 2, Interesting
      When messing around with mandrake, one must be extra-careful. More careful than, say, mucking around with debian. That's because Mandrake holds your hand... so you must disable all the hand-holding stuff before you want to get down n' dirty (linuxconf daemon comes on by default... good luck editing your config files :)

      Once you disable the moron-proofing, you are left with a distro that is as easy to use as you want it to. Great stuff, mandrake.

    18. Re:The installation review is really impressive by i.r.id10t · · Score: 1

      I installed Office XP and 2k a few times today, on both Win2k and XP Pro machines. No reboots were requested. Of coure, I rebooted anyway, but only after doing a few more things to each machine.

      --
      Don't blame me, I voted for Kodos
    19. Re:The installation review is really impressive by cens0r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      generally it says I must reboot... I say no... install the next driver... say no... install the next piece of software. I've never had a problem.

      --
      Jack Valenti and Orrin Hatch will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes.
    20. Re:The installation review is really impressive by the+unbeliever · · Score: 3, Insightful

      heh, that's fine as long as you at least reboot after the chipset drivers, because it's always best to have those installed and working before installing other drivers.

    21. Re:The installation review is really impressive by FCKGW · · Score: 1

      All versions of Windows with an NT kernel have a partitioning step in their installs. So, yes, Windows installs do include partitioning.

      --
      It's an operating system, not a religion.
    22. Re:The installation review is really impressive by erikdotla · · Score: 1

      You know, the two most recent versions of Office (XP and 2003) do not require a reboot on a Windows XP system. A progress bar moves, then says it's done, and that's it.

      --
      # Erik
    23. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you not use 'wget' which has a '--continue' switch so that you can continue interrupted downloads where they left off?

      http://wget.sunsite.dk/

      It's available for windows, afaik :

      ftp://sunsite.dk/projects/wget/windows/

    24. Re:The installation review is really impressive by BiggerIsBetter · · Score: 4, Informative

      It doesn't. He must have done it as root.

      It's actually supermount that provides the names for the drives. To rename them, you just rename /mnt/cdrom to /mnt/cdrw (or whatever) directory available and edit /etc/fstab to reflect the change.

      --
      Forget thrust, drag, lift and weight. Airplanes fly because of money.
    25. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The truth is that it _won't_ allow you to do this as a regular user. One would have to be root and even then you would have to rename the files with mv at the cli. I am calling bullshit on the original post.

    26. Re:The installation review is really impressive by whiteranger99x · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There's one problem, your analogy is a little off kilter. Basically what he tried to do in Linux is the equivalent of changing the drive letter in Windows XP, not fiddling with a system file or the registry.

      --
      Join the TWIT army now!
    27. Re:The installation review is really impressive by puddpunk · · Score: 1

      You could try knode (included with kdenetwork).

      Cheers,
      Chris.

    28. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The best Linux install I've had is SuSE 9.0. I just did a network install. Identified my nick from the list, typed in a ftp mirror, set the partitions, and 2 hours later had a working system with everything I wanted and the only thing I had to play around with was inside of SaX to get the wheel on my mouse to work. (The choice that worked was not intuitive however. Thank you person in IRC who helped!)

      Compared to other versions I've installed, this was a breeze. I had installed Mandrake 9.2 a few days prior, and while it got every single bit of my hardware correct (including the mouse) it just didn't behave properly on my system with the default configs. Once I ran their update utility several things became broken. That tipped the scales to send me back to SuSE. (I had SuSE 7.2 on before.) Other than maybe wanting to change the default file system from reiser to ext3, there is little to complain about. If you want to use their setup tool (Yast) it just works, and you can get anything you want off of the SuSE mirrors tested and reliable for your system. It may take a few more weeks for stuff to end up over there, but you have a good idea that when it does it wont break things.

    29. Re:The installation review is really impressive by dchamp · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Shenanigans. Linuxconf is not on by default in Mandrake, and thank god it isn't. It isn't even installed by default unless you tell it to.

      As far as "Mandrake is easy to break" goes... I guess if you do some pretty silly stuff while logged in as root, yes, you can break it. It's much easier to break stuff in WinXP Home - because everyone is an Administrator. I didn't need that silly \windows\system32\krnl386.exe file anyway, did I?

      Installing Mandrake is extremely easy, as the author states. There are often some "gotchas", like getting your laptop's screen resolution to run at the native 1920x1200, or having to go download & install the nVidia driver (if you're using the free download version of Mandrake). But the one reboot vs. 9 for XP (my last XP Pro install had 12 reboots, but I think I lost track...) is a real bonus in my opinion.

      "Linuxconf is the evil spawn of satan." - me

    30. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Malcontent · · Score: 1

      I just installed 200 today. Hit the windows update and I don't know how many times I rebooted. After the first three or four windows update started failing completely and I had to download all the patches by hand install them one at a time.

      Sucks big time compared to installing debian and typing apt-get upgrade.

      --

      War is necrophilia.

    31. Re:The installation review is really impressive by dchamp · · Score: 1

      He's talking about the time quoted in the article.

      For the WinXP install:

      # 50 minutes (excluding time to format disk)
      # One DVD-ROM, one driver CD and several Internet updates
      # Ten screens of questions
      # Nine (or more) reboots - I may have missed some

      For the Mandrake install:

      # 40 minutes (including time to format disk)
      # Two CDROMs and one Internet update
      # Nine dialog screens - plus three screens when logging in for the first time to configure your desktop type and email and news accounts
      # One reboot!

      I'd suggest reading the article before posting, but hey... this is slashdot...

    32. Re:The installation review is really impressive by realdpk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Idealy, the system would recognize the change and update any old references to the path on-the-fly. Not necessarily easy, but it would sure help in cases like this.

    33. Re:The installation review is really impressive by jilles · · Score: 1

      For the record, if you try, you will find that explorer hides options like delete and rename on system folders like program files. If you finally find a way to delete using explorer (e.g. by hitting delete) you get an error message. It's not impossible but if you manage to delete your program files folder, you fully deserve the missery. There's several layers of protection and warnings.

      --

      Jilles
    34. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      There's several layers of protection and warnings.

      Excuse me but if deleting that folder actually breaks the system in such a bad way shouldn't it be impossible to do that, at least from the GUI?

      How does MacOS X handle attempts to delete system files/folders?

    35. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily easy, but it would sure help in cases like this.

      modprobe telepathy.o

    36. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Kent+Recal · · Score: 1

      But I bet there still is a file somewhere out there that you have never seen before... ;-)

    37. Re:The installation review is really impressive by RenaissanceGeek · · Score: 1

      Do you mean like MacOS (pre OSX) did? All file identification was done by unique-file-id/disk-id, not name-and-path.

      You could make an alias to a file, then take that file and move it, duplicate it, rename it: whatever: the alias would still sucessfully point to the original file (even if you moved the alias to a different disk.)

      The only time that I've ever heard of this going wrong was when a guy was trying to manually clone a batch of hard-drives: the aliases to the applications all pointed to the apps installed on the original hard-drive, not the new local one. (This being non-profit work, he didn't want to pay for drive-cloning software.)

      --
      What is the difference between a small revolutionary change and a large evolutionary change?
    38. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Yokaze · · Score: 1

      > Not necessarily easy, but it would sure help in cases like this.
      Not necessarily complicated:
      Monitor the "/home" directory for changes with FAM a "FAMMoved"-event denotes the renaming of a home directory. Make approriate changes in necessary files (e.g. passwd/shadow). A "FAMDeleted"-event could trigger a dialogue, which confirms the removal of the user from the db, a "FAMCreated"-event the dialogue for adding a new user.

      The problem is, for every such solution there are surely hundred of other places to break the system, especially as root. So such work would probably in vain.

      --
      "Between strong and weak, between rich and poor [...], it is freedom which oppresses and the law which sets free"
    39. Re:The installation review is really impressive by SoTuA · · Score: 0, Redundant

      Yes it is. If you just breeze through all the installation clicking "OK" linuxconf daemon will come up every time you power on and replace all the changes you did to the config files with your favorite editor with the sensible choices made at installation time or through a nice GUI configuration tool.

      Of course, you DO have the option of not installing it, or turing it off when you decide wich daemons go up (first time I installed mandrake I didn't see it).

      I didn't say it was easy to break. In fact, all that hand-holding make it hard to break - but it also makes it hard to fine tune to your tastes. Just turn off the hand-holding, and you are left with one of the best distros in town.

      And yes oh yes, linuxconf IS the spawn of satan. Although satan might take offense at that.

    40. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Ask the poor guy to rename "Program Files" to "stuff_to_run" or something like that and see how XP handles it.

      I did something similar.

      I wanted profiles on a different drive than software. This is a perfectly reasonable thing to do, no? In fact, it's something all unix people have been doing for a very long time: you don't want some bozo user downloading gigs of stuff and not leaving enough room on the system disk for system updates or new software. You also don't want to go down the path of disk quotas, for there lies madness.

      Fortunately, (IIRC) there's just one registry key that determines where new profiles are created. Even so, why is this a registry key, not some admin-visible setting?

      Now, I'm a perfectionist, so I want ALL profiles put on a separate drive: even the default admin profile created when I installed the machine. So the problem becomes moving all profiles from one place to another.

      This was hellish. Basically had to do a search-and-replace on the registry, both the system and software registries and individual profile registries. If you have a lot of profiles you're moving over, you have to load each one individually and do your search-and-replace. Since there are an immense number of keys, most undocumented, you never know if you're going to break something. If you miss one key, you can seriously fubar the machine.

      I did finally get it working but then there are unfortunately certain software packages that expect a C:\Documents and Settings, so that had to actually contain profiles. Solved this with a reparse point.

      Compare this to, say, Mac OS X. All you have to do there is copy the home directory to the new place and change one netinfo entry. If you want Linux, just vipw, cp -pR and you're done.

      As for C:\Program Files, I don't think you could ever get rid of that. Again, compare to Mac OS X where you can just drag everything out of /Applications, blow away that directory, it stays gone and everything still works.

    41. Re:The installation review is really impressive by JPriest · · Score: 1

      Linux is ready for the desktop because it can be installed?? What about actually using the operating system in a real world environment? The first time the user needs to install a package, or fix or change something everything is a amess.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    42. Re:The installation review is really impressive by Helter · · Score: 1

      Yeah, and with my last debian installation apt-get simply refused to connect to any sources, despite being online and perfectly fine.

  4. Re:I is impressed by airjrdn · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Off Topic? I was pointing him to a faster hard drive to eliminate his troubles. Nice modding. *shaking head*

  5. Asus DigiMatrix by 3Suns · · Score: 4, Informative

    On a somewhat related note, there's a recent article on anandtech about the Asus DigiMatrix, a barebone computer aimed at people building a home-theater PC. that's one sexy box, with a volume knob and case buttons and an LCD, video capture card, radio tuner, tv tuner, gigabit ethernet, wireless ethernet, DVD/CD-RW, embedded audio-player OS, 7-in-1 card reader...

    I'm seriously considering getting one of these and making a linux media station / fileserver. Obviously Asus supports only Win2k and WinXP, but it seems like a fun challenge getting all those cutting-edge hardware components to run in linux. Most of them, even the ethernet controller, are so new they aren't directly supported in the kernel yet. And getting all the various Linux media applications to start up and obey the case buttons automatically based on what is inserted sounds like a software project in itself.

    --

    -3Suns

    ~~~~
    The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    1. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by ERJ · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yeah, I was looking at this too as a mythtv frontend to a mythtv server. Anyway, in my exploration I found this site:

      Linus on ASUS DigiMatrix

    2. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by ERJ · · Score: 1

      Damn my fumble fingers...that should have been:

      Linux on ASUS DigiMatrix.

    3. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by FePe · · Score: 2, Funny
      Linus on ASUS DigiMatrix

      I tried that link, but I was disapointed to see that it wasn't Linus standing on a ASUS DigiMatrix!

      --
      "Until you do what you believe in, how do you know whether you believe in it or not?" -- Leo Tolstoy
    4. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by blackmonday · · Score: 4, Funny

      As an owner of a Linux box with wireless ethernet and a TV Tuner, I suggest something less painless and more fun than your project: hang yourself by the testicles on a merry-go-round.

    5. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by waferhead · · Score: 1

      OK, I'm going to have to blow my mods up...

      The main reason to get a Digimatrix is it's ***HDTV*** AND CABLE TUNER.

      The HDTV part has no Linux drivers, and unless ASUS helps out here with at least binary drivers, it's almost pointless to use Linux here.

      I looked HARD at this box, and am tempted, but it will be a Windows box (unless ASUS helps) and I don't do Windows. (Yes, I'm one of those people, still have an Amiga 3000, so bite me)

    6. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by morcheeba · · Score: 1
      I was reading the review and digging it, until I got to the "known issues" page:
      The second issue comes with the macrovision encoding that the HDTV does via the SiS301C video bridge. If you have that form of video out enabled, programs like PowerDVD and the DVD play within Home Theater crashes. The easiest way to avoid this is just to disable video out and set the primary display to your monitor (CRT or LCD mode).
      You can't play DVDs on a TV with this machine, and neither ASUS nor the reviewer didn't consider that a serious problem? The big deal about this computer is that it is designed for the living room to be connected to a TV (it has a TV tuner built in!). Bringing this box to my computer room, or bringing my 21" computer monitor out to the living room isn't going to cut it as a solution.

      I'm surprised that with that restriction, ASUS even tried to make this box. Wow, companies really are as dumb and easily bullied as the DVDCCA thinks!
    7. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by 3Suns · · Score: 1
      1. This may be a bug with the way Anandtech installed the software
      2. this may be a peculiarity (defect) in their sample
      3. it may work to use regular NTSC video out, rather than HDTV encoding (albeit at a regular TV resolution)
      4. this may not be a problem if you installed other DVD software
      5. it definitely isn't a DRM issue, in which case it wouldn't crash the player
      6. chances are it's a bug that will be fixed soon
      --

      -3Suns

      ~~~~
      The Revolution will be Slashdotted
    8. Re:Asus DigiMatrix by morcheeba · · Score: 1

      Good points, but I do have to object to point number 5. The screenshot they show says (and it contradicts itself) "DVD Error / TheTV Out port of your display is not working properly. / This copy protected disc can not be ploayed when the TV out function is enabled." So, I fear that it is a DRM issue that won't be fixed.

      But, like you pointed out, we can't really tell what's going on yet - from the exact situation that's causing the problem, to what the actual product will do.

  6. Re:from the little-black-noisy dept... by adpowers · · Score: 5, Informative

    I agree. I made one of these little machines for someone yesterday. It only has two fans in the system, a power supply fan and a CPU/system fan. Plus, the system fan is a 'smart' fan, so it scales its speed based on the temperature of the CPU. It is loud when you first turn it on, but as soon as it detects that the CPU is a safe temperature, it backs off. I couldn't hear it at all over my normal computer. Even with my normal computer off, it is still very quiet. Unless you are running Prime95 or gaming or something, it should stay fairly quiet.

    I was really impressed with the little XPC machine. My mom thought it was cute machine and I was like, "This is what I have wanted to make for you!"

    adpowers

  7. Network Appliance? by signalgod · · Score: 5, Interesting

    What exactly qualifies this small form factor computer as a network applicance?

    I'm just curious...

    --
    --------------------------------------------- SignalGod ---------------------------------------------
    1. Re:Network Appliance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What exactly qualifies this small form factor computer as a network applicance?

      It has a NIC.

    2. Re:Network Appliance? by signalgod · · Score: 2, Informative

      From Webopedia: Network Applicance: A typically inexpensive personal computer, sometimes called a thin client, that enables Internet access and some business-related activities but lacks many features of a fully equipped PC, such as a hard drive or CD-ROM. Applications used on network appliances typically are housed on a Web server accessed by the appliance. Network appliances are used to ease remote management and cut costs. Is this not a full featured PC? Doesn't it have a Hard Drive and a CD-ROM?

      --
      --------------------------------------------- SignalGod ---------------------------------------------
    3. Re:Network Appliance? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What exactly qualifies this small form factor computer as a network applicance?

      I believe the qualifications come in the form of "dead presidents" submitted to Slashdot, along with the story and PR material.

    4. Re:Network Appliance? by Mad_Rain · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the article:

      "Unless you're a close follower of Shuttle press releases, you may wonder what defines a Network Appliance XPC - and indeed the definition does seem somewhat fuzzy. The common feature tends to be the inclusion of one or more "server" features - such as Gigabit LAN, or dual PCI, or dual LAN or RAID support. The current range of Network Appliance XPCs includes the SB52G2 (featuring the Intel 845GV chipset, Gigabit LAN and two PCI slots), the SB62G2 (featuring the Intel 865G chipset, SATA RAID, dual LAN adapters and the subject of today's review) and the SB75G2 (featuring the Intel 875P chipset, SATA RAID and a single Gigabit LAN adapter)."

      My best guess is that it has some hardware abilities more in-line with a server than a standard desktop.

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    5. Re:Network Appliance? by erikdotla · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I have to agree with the original poster. It's seamless, simple, kiosk-like software that makes a computer into an appliance. Form factor and cool knobs are a start, and have the potential to allow an enthusiast to turn it into an appliance, but it sure isn't an appliance out of the box.

      After I complete my Mandrake installation, how do I instruct my non-techie brother to copy a video he downloaded to the appliance, and then play it on the TV? I have to write some script to monitor a folder for new videos and play them automatically. Same for pictures? Need some sort of folder monitor and slideshow. Not to mention I have to set up the shares. Forget it.

      A true appliance won't even need a keyboard or mouse. It's front panel would have all the controls you need and well documented usage instructions. I don't have to telnet to my microwave, nor do I have to telnet to my complicated DVD and surround sound equipment, which supports VCDs and the like. I put them in and they start. I put food in, press a button, and it gets hot.

      Since this is a computer-based appliance, it should have the option for remote configuration. Perhaps I'd name my machine Linguo. I'd expect to dump a video to \\linguo\Play_Video and press a video button on the front panel. When it's done, it would archive it into a DVR-like system that I could call up and play later using http://linguo from any computer in the house.

      I'd dump a picture to \\linguo\Pictures and press a picture button on the front panel and it would start a slideshow. Another front panel button would flip it into thumbnail mode (like my digital camera) and a few arrow keys and the picture button would let me view the pictures.

      I'd dump an MP3 to \\linguo\Music and press a music button on the front panel. It would start playing the first track and would have two buttons - album select, track select. If I had 4000 MP3s up there, I might choose to visit http://linguo and ask it to play a specific song.

      Of course, a standard tv-style remote control unit should eliminate the need for even the web server, though it should maybe stay for the "select one song from 4000" example, where a PC interface is simply the most efficient.

      Ideally, I'd never even install the OS, and wouldn't even know or care what it was running. All I know is that it creates shares on my network compatible with Windows, Mac OSX, and Linux, and it works.

      That's an appliance.

      --
      # Erik
  8. Speeding up....... by psi42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    This is where things start to pick up...

    With a Linux distro bundled with hardware, buyers of said hardware do not need to go on their own initiative to download and install linux. It is right at their fingertips, bundled with their new barebone. They've just bought a Penguin Powered system, and chances are they will try linux out and not just delete it...... And then they will see the light.....

    And this is where Linux on the Desktop really starts to expand......

    Let it begin.

    --
    Defenestrate Windows...
    1. Re:Speeding up....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As you have put forward a well thought-out argument, using neither conjecture nor name
      calling; I will do the same:

      You are a worthless CUNT!

    2. Re:Speeding up....... by jbplou · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I think things it would be much better if dell offer home users a choice between Windows and Mandrake and the customer got a $75 discount if they used Mandrake. Then Linux would start penetrating the market quickly.

    3. Re:Speeding up....... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where does that $75 dollars come from? Dell refusing to provide support for the machine?

  9. Linux by Raindance · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Another big name looks like it's going to shack up with Linux."

    Linux seems to really get around. But what will the children look like?

    1. Re:Linux by miketang16 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They will look like this.

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    2. Re:Linux by ExoticMandibles · · Score: 1

      Not just that, but he's only nine years old! How, erm, precocious!

    3. Re:Linux by miketang16 · · Score: 1

      Who the hell modded me insightful? That was meant as a joke... lol

      --
      -------
      "In times of universal deceit, telling the truth becomes a revolutionary act."
      -- George Orwell
    4. Re:Linux by dbIII · · Score: 3, Funny
      Linux seems to really get around. But what will the children look like?
      There won't be any. Unix can't have children.
  10. Mirror! by FiberOpPraise · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since the site is dying at 10 posts already:

    Mirror!

  11. Network Appliance. by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Informative

    Interesting topic, Shuttle XPC Linux Network Appliance.

    A PC+Linux isn't a network appliance, its still a PC. A true network appliance, is a raid array with an ethernet adapter, its a piece of hardware performing a function.

    Before you say, well yes the computer can do it also.. You have install and set it up. Appliances in general are stupid things that are cheap and easy to replace, you just plug in and turn on. PC's are not appliances.

    Little pet peeve, but really if you don't care for HD's and the whole 1000k vs 1024K, this is along those lines. Use the correct terms you hackers.

    1. Re:Network Appliance. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what is a CSU/DSU?

      They certainly require set-up.
      They are not cheap.
      They require very specific training to replace.

      So are they an appliance?

      Or are we talking about it being a lightbulb?

  12. Re:from the little-black-noisy dept... by konfoo · · Score: 5, Informative

    The only problem is that it *doesnt* stay quiet. I have one of these on top of my TV. The fan on the CPU is a POS, and the two little fans are the same brand. After about 3-4 weeks of being on continuously they are all whining at 100 decibels. I've pulled the plug on the two case fans, but the CPU fan continues to whine and rattle. Cheap-ass POS.

  13. Just got my own Shuttle system by Bander · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I just built out my own Shuttle system a couple of weeks ago, based around the SB65G2 and a P4 3Ghz. Unless you've seen one in person, the "cube" format is smaller than you expect from pictures.

    The quality of the case and motherboard are very impressive, the cooling solution for such a small system is very clever. In addition, the instructions that came with the system are very clear, with photographs that detail each step of the build.

    I'm dual booting it between XP and Redhat 9, and both are running great on the system.

    -- Bander

    1. Re:Just got my own Shuttle system by lspd · · Score: 2, Informative

      I just built out my own Shuttle system a couple of weeks ago, based around the SB65G2 and a P4 3Ghz.

      I have four of the SK41G Shuttle boxes running Debian stable as web servers. I have to agree that the construction it top notch and the cooling system is very effective. The integrated sound chipset is also quite nice once you set up ALSA. The integrated video is unimpressive for a desktop, but works well enough on a server and there's an AGP 4x slot open with plenty of room for a decent video card (air circulation might be a problem though.) The only downsides I've noticed are that you need a newer kernel than Debian stable offers to get IDE DMA working properly, and the memory is limited to PC2100.

      Do all of the features of the SB65G2 work with a 2.4 kernel? I'd rather not migrate to a 2.6 kernel or rely on proprietary drivers for AGP 8x and SATA. Other than that, the SB65G sounds like a worthwhile improvement.

    2. Re:Just got my own Shuttle system by Bander · · Score: 2, Informative

      there's an AGP 4x slot open with plenty of room for a decent video card (air circulation might be a problem though.)

      Well, I went nuts and got a Radeon 9800 Pro for the 8x AGP slot. Seems to work fine, no heat-related issues so far, and I've been giving the UT2004 demo a few workouts.

      Do all of the features of the SB65G2 work with a 2.4 kernel?

      On-board 10/100 ethernet works great. I use a USB keyboard with an optical mouse chained to it, both work fine. (You do need a PS2 keyboard to mess with the BIOS, but that's not unusual.) To take advantage of the onboard audio you need to download the driver from Realtek and build it for your kernel, but that's not especially difficult, and the sound quality is good.

      I read a few posts that suggest Linux support for S-ATA is not quite ready for primetime, so I chickened out and went with ATA-100. Turns out that's damn fast as it is, and well supported.

      UT2003 is not as fast under Linux as it is under XP, which is disappointing. I'm not sure why that is -- might be because ATI's Linux drivers are lagging behind their Win32 drivers, might be problems with AGP 8x support. Also, I couldn't get UT2003 to work with ALSA, though I confess I didn't spend a lot of time troubleshooting it, since the framerate and rendering features (reflective water and other icing) is just better under XP.

      Anyhow, it's a sweet setup for gaming under XP, and excellent for getting real work done under Linux.

      -- Bander

    3. Re:Just got my own Shuttle system by lspd · · Score: 1

      UT2003 is not as fast under Linux as it is under XP, which is disappointing. I'm not sure why that is...

      UT2003 uses an OpenGL wrapper that makes it noticeably slower on Linux, even with optimal hardware. Enemy Territory would be a better way of comparing between the two, but I'd expect the ATI drivers on Linux to slow things down a bit.

      Guess I'll stick with the SK41G until SATA is 100% reliable.

    4. Re:Just got my own Shuttle system by TarpaKungs · · Score: 1

      Mandrake 9.1, linux 2.4.21 on SB75G2 - SATA works prefectly, straight into DMA. Very fast, very stable box. Got one at work - I'm extemely impressed.

      --
      Why can't women be like Hedy Lamarr - beautiful, talented and inventors of frequency-hopping spread-spectrum techn
  14. Re:from the little-black-noisy dept... by lantius · · Score: 5, Informative

    I've built a few of these as well. My mother loves the one I got her for Christmas, even though it took her a while to understand that it was the whole computer and not just an external cd-burner, which is what she had asked for. =) Even better yet, on the noise fron though Shuttle has finally released a new version, the Shuttle Zen, which features an external laptop-style power brick adapter. Hence, only one fan total and it has even less equipment inside to cool. Very smart! This is of course old news to folks who prefer the Mini-ITX formfactor (or the absolutely tiny Nano-ITX or other such shrinkages), where external power and no CPU fan leads to truly silent computing.

  15. Good article... by jdtanner · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Another good article from these guys.

    My point is, surely your experience of installing an OS is largely dependant on the *extra* hardware that you have e.g. 802.11b card etc

    I think it is great that Linux can get a fairly "standard" PC up and running without too much hastle these days. However, it is the glitches encountered with "non-standard" PCs that mean it isn't quite ready for the end users desktop.

    Just my two pennies worth...

    1. Re:Good article... by Taim · · Score: 1

      I have a number of non-standard PCs sitting around and getting them to work with Windows (XP Pro) is often harder than getting them to work with Linux (Generally RH or Fedora, but I'm playing with moving to Mandrake). For example, I have a PCI to PC-Card adapater with a PC-Card 802.11b network adapter, that Linux has never had trouble with (Back to Red Hat 7.3 out of the box) but even XP pro doesn't include the drivers for (It supports the adapter, but not the card, whereas Linux automagically grabs an IP address with no user intervention). I know this is one example, I just wanted to point out that you're over-generalizing, and that Linux is, in fact, more capable than Windows to handle some esoteric hardware configurations.

    2. Re:Good article... by FlipmodePlaya · · Score: 5, Informative

      My thinking is just the opposite. I've experienced installs of XP (during a short lived dual boot experiment) and Linux on my PC. I have plenty of potentially problem causing hardware, like my Hauppage 401 capture card and Mad Dog 52x CD burner. SuSe, the only distro I've installed since acquiring the afformentioned hardware, had both of them working after the install. It even threw in KWinTV for TV viewing, and K3B for burning. With XP, I had to use the install CDs that came with those products. That added about 1/2 an hour onto my install time, factoring in reboots. My long winded point is that Linux seems to have already surpassed Windows in terms of auto-configuration for hardware. This is especially helpful during a frustring OS install.

      Another good thing about Linux, it was able to make use of my fancy new NVidia 5900 as soon as I put it in. A quick configuration dialogue (two or three clicks, no settings had to be changed) and I was done with it. With Windows, I was forced to run in a very low resolution while tracking down the NVidia drivers for it. Again, Linux makes using new hardware easier and faster.

      One more story, I bought a USB keyboard to replace a broken, old, PS2 one. Linux autoconfigured it, and I was done with it as quickly as I was with the video card. In Windows, I could not type a password to log on, because it did not recognize the USB keyboard. I had to borrow a working PS2 one from a friend so I could log on, and then plug in the USB KB. I then had to use the character map utility for a bit as I installed the new KB. It took me an extra two days to get a KB working under Windows!

  16. Things you will only read on /. by OECD · · Score: 1

    Another big name... Shuttle, the maker of those small little cube looking PCs...

    Heh.

    --
    One man's -1 Flamebait is another man's +5 Funny.
  17. Shuttle is a spammer by valentyn · · Score: 0, Informative

    Sorry for having to mention this, but we get spam from Shuttle Germany: ``If you don't want this kind of email, then please answer with "No Mail".''

    I will never do business with Shuttle. Shuttle in Germany is a spam supporting company.

    --
    my other sig is a 500 page novel
    1. Re:Shuttle is a spammer by Cryogenes · · Score: 4, Informative

      I have bought two shuttles and I have exchanged emails with their technical support. And, yes, I do live in Germany.

      I have never received an unsolicited mail from them.

    2. Re:Shuttle is a spammer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I get at least one a week from Shuttle Germany. These fuckers can die.

  18. Plenty of glitches with Windows by limpdawg · · Score: 1

    I have a Creative Labs TNT PCI video card that I could never get to work properly with Windows 98. The card worked perfectly with xfree86, and I have it currently installed in the Linux server next to me. Sometimes Windows just doesn't work with some hardware, and it's considered ready for the desktop.

    --

    Nascantur in Admiratione. (Let them be born in Wonder)

  19. Bring on the heatpipes! by Griffon26 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How long will it take until they start making these things with heatpipes and large heatsinks and without fans?

    I'd much rather have a passively cooled box with a transmeta crusoe/efficeon or VIA C3 and a PVR350 card, than a box that can do software encoding+decoding and needs lots of fans.

    1. Re:Bring on the heatpipes! by MoonBuggy · · Score: 1

      Shuttles support P4 3.2GHz chips - I challenge anyone to fit a big enough passive heatsink into that case without melting any of your system.

      This is a full PC in a small case. If you want an computer powered 'appliance' then go for mini-ITX.

    2. Re:Bring on the heatpipes! by justMichael · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, here are your heat pipes.

      And if you want really quiet try one of these

  20. I must be behind... by sirReal.83. · · Score: 2

    ...now 2.6GHz machines with 800MHz FSB's and HT are "network appliances?"

    I guess nobody told my P4-1.4 that, because it's certainly handling its duties as a web/file server, router and workstation quite well.

    1. Re:I must be behind... by pehowland · · Score: 1

      You can stick whatever processor you like in the machine - a 1.4GHz would work fine too ;-)

    2. Re:I must be behind... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Actually, it would have to be Socket 478 (or 479 when the PowerLeap adaptor comes out for the Pentium M). The 1.4 P4 was only available in Socket 423.

    3. Re:I must be behind... by sirReal.83. · · Score: 1

      Really? My slot A must be a forgery.

  21. how about PVR? by BlackShirt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    is shuttle suitable? has anyone tried? what about noise?

    1. Re:how about PVR? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Shuttles are a touch noisy for this. They are quiet but noticable in a room without any other background noise...

      Cheers

      Matt

    2. Re:how about PVR? by BlueLightning · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm trying to build one using the Shuttle ST62K, as it has an external fanless PSU and a very quiet internal fan, thus making it almost perfect for a PVR. However the Linux support isn't as great with it as its ATI chipset is very new. I'm currently in the early stages of trying to get it sorted out.

    3. Re:how about PVR? by lordfoul · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I use a Shuttle XPC sk41g with an Amd Athlon 2400+ with Showshifter as the PVR software. It works great and is very Quiet. I can't hear it unless I am within a couple inches of the box. SHuttle uses a very large heat pipe with only one fan (variable speed user set-able).

    4. Re:how about PVR? by r1ckt3r · · Score: 2

      Using an SK41G with MythTV. Very quiet, I went ahead and got one for my desktop as well because it was so quiet. My old, loud tower sits in the closet now as a fileserver.

  22. Looks like... by inode_buddha · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... this could fill in a bit of market gap left by the Cobalt line, maybe? I know I'm interested in this anyway.

    --
    C|N>K
  23. Shuttles rock! by BookRead · · Score: 3, Informative
    The form factor is outstanding. Inside is a little snug and they aren't all that expandable but they make great workstations and small servers and they aren't space or energy hogs. I bought one because it was relatively cheap and customizable and love it for its quality. They are really well engineered. Nothing in excess about them but plenty of capacity.

    Now shipping with Linux (and it installs easier than XP)! Holy cow! How did the future sneak up on us like that?

    1. Re:Shuttles rock! by cmacb · · Score: 1

      Most likely my next PC will be a Shuttle, or something very much like it (even smaller footprint would be desirable. I want a desktop system, no fan noise, separate keyboard, video and mouse. And paying a lot more for a laptop to do that is silly.

      I hope more systems integrators "get it" soon. The Big Case vs Laptop at premium prices is a false economic choice to have to make.

    2. Re:Shuttles rock! by Bakaneko · · Score: 2

      www.cappuccinopc.com

      Hey, if you get Linux working well on one of them, let me know... I've been dying to buy one and maybe a Flash-RAM IDE drive and get MythTV or the like working on it...

      I've had one of the Shuttle XPCs for about 2 years now and am very happy with it, but its more of a workstation choice than a MediaPC/Appliance.

  24. Reviewer should test Mandrake also previosly... by Pecisk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...as RedHat NEVER actually cared about user expierence so much as Mandrake have all the time. Ok, for some time and still Mandrake Linux 9.2 initial release was too buggy, BUT things are improving, if we are talking about user interface side. Configuration tools and update system in Mandrake are clean and very well thought (don't talking about rpm depency here, only graphical interface). All things mentioned by reviewer also have made my life easer (don't looking to that I'm advanced Linux sysadmin). People starts to pick those things what Mandrake have envolved and extended for years. Good for them. As I have left them as my favorite platform - using Debian now - but still, Galaxy as default theme for both KDE and GNOME rocks as their many configuration tools. And it has the best solution in Linux how to mount SMB share in GUI.

    --
    user@ubuntubox:~$ stfu This server is going down for shutdown NOW!
  25. The kids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    No, they'll look like this:

    The kids

  26. crack smokers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    I don't know what kind of crack some of you are smoking about having to reboot continuously with Windows XP. I use both Linux and Windows and I rarely have to reboot either. Anyone who says otherwise is just spouting fud.

    1. Re:crack smokers by Namaseit · · Score: 1

      So when you install new apps you NEVER have to reboot? When you update windows you NEVER have to reboot? When you install new drivers(video, etc.) you NEVER have to reboot? Wow that sounds like a great version of Windows. Sure wish you weren't the only person using it in fantasyland.

      --
      75% of all statistics are made up!
    2. Re:crack smokers by Agret · · Score: 2, Insightful

      When installing anything Windows tells me to reboot, I just end task the setup.exe and run the program, it still works, Windows is just stupid and looks bullshitting you. When you install new drivers you have to reboot, go into safe mode, remove the current driver, reboot, get some bullshit about no video drivers, install the new driver, then reboot AGAIN, you've just wasted a shitload of time you'd never had to have used waiting for your computer to reboot if you were running linux. Windows XP Professional is good, if you leave your computer on for 24/7 (like most people) after awhile your computer starts to lag badly and you need to reboot, OR just deal with a painfully slow OS for about half an hour, then it starts to go normal speed again, I never know why, but its Professional so I take its word for it ;) ;) *nudge* *nudge*

      --
      Have you metaroderated recently?
  27. Re:from the little-black-noisy dept... by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of a bunch of Acers that were shipped about a month or two ago to the retail store where I worked. They also had a "smart" system fan. Unfortunately, the "smart" part of the fan got screwed somewhere and the fan revved up to full speed and stayed there, not only making the blasted thing sound like a Chinook helicopter, but also venting out air at ludicrous speeds. It was bad enough that you could feel the air flow even 3 meters ( ~9 feet for the silly people among us ) away from the thing. And hear it too. Some sort of patch was released after we contacted Acer and that calmed the thing down, more or less. I'm still amazed the fan itself didn't shatter into a thousand bits mere seconds after power on.

  28. Re:GGGGARYGERAGAGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    who cares it was understandable.

  29. Shuttle and Linux by DoctorPepper · · Score: 1

    I bought a Shuttle SS51G about this time last year. 1.7 GHz Celeron, 512 MB of RAM and an 80 GB hard drive. I originally stuck Mandrake on there, then after a month, moved to Debian (testing). I've been running Debian on there since, and I must say it is a very nice fit.

    --

    No matter where you go... there you are.
  30. HTPC by DeadBugs · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Shuttles make great Home Theater PC's. I have been using one for several months now. Linux support for this type of hobby is growing as well.

    Using one of these you can build a device for your home theater that will handle MP3's, DVD's, DIVX, Pictures and act like a TIVO.

    Adding Linux to the mix could make pre-configured HTPC boxes as common as DVD players. Maybe even for sale at Walmart.

    --
    http://www.kubuntu.org/
  31. On the bottom of the linked Shuttle page: by incom · · Score: 3, Insightful

    *This site is optimized for Netscape 4.5, Mozilla 1.0 and IE 5.0 or above.

    This may be a good company to support(with purchases). Thier left hand and right hand seem to be coordinated.

    --
    True genius is grasping a situation like a peice of fruit, and peircing it just right so that it drains dry.
  32. Re:"Big Name"????? by Carch · · Score: 2, Informative

    What planet have you been living on for the past year? Shuttle is the most successful manufacturer of small-form-factor PC hardware. Begone, troll.

    --
    _/\ - Sturgeon's Law: 90% of everything is crud.
  33. Re:from the little-black-noisy dept... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I was talking to a friend who works at nvidia and he said that the fans are a little noisy, but they were chosen because they don't fail.

    Just put a quieter fan in there and watch that fan.

  34. One more thought... by waferhead · · Score: 1

    If ASUS were to release a ready to roll Linux distro with the Digimatrix, with all the required drivers (HDTV), preconfigured/ready to run out of the box with MythTV or such, they would just about own the world with this totally slick little box.

    1. Re:One more thought... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorta, but the video capture card doesn't do hardware compression. That's makes a lot of difference.

      Now if they stuck a WinTV PVR card in there instead of that whimpy capture card then we might have something. The PVR creates beautiful MPEG2 captures that can be burned straight to DVD. No mess, no fuss.

    2. Re:One more thought... by bhtooefr · · Score: 1

      Did you notice that it's a MINI-PCI card? Didn't think so. They really had to do a lot of work to get it in that form factor...

  35. Mod parent down, He hasnt used mandrake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Have you tried Mandrake recently, or are you talking about some crap distro such as Debian.

    Sharing files, just right click and share once you have set it up using Mandrake Control Center.

    Burning a CD, say hello to K3b, the easiest Linux burning software.

    Setting up a firewall is a job for your mouse in Mandrake as well.

    Please stop spreading fud. Mandrake makes things easy, you are now on my foes list.

    1. Re:Mod parent down, He hasnt used mandrake! by steve.m · · Score: 1

      Fair enuff. Things have moved on a bit since I last looked (I've mainly used RH9 + gnome).
      My point was that you install an OS once (usually) - it doesn't matter how long it takes, because the time you spend installing is a fraction of the time you spend using it for everyday tasks (websurfing, CD burning, email, etc.).

      The learning curve of linux is still steeper than windows (mainly due to the spit'n'polish research microsoft can afford to do)

    2. Re:Mod parent down, He hasnt used mandrake! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not sure even that is true. Most of us are more familiar with Windows than with Linux (whether we like to admit it or not) so the way Windows behaves seems more natural, but to me Mandrake 9.2 seems more polished in many respects than Windows.

      IF everything "just worked" in Windows it would be a different matter, but it doesn't, and when it doesn't the Microsoft approach of "don't tell them anything they might not understand" actually makes the learning curve more like a brick wall. I've spent far too many hours trying to make things work in Windows to be impressed with their "spit'n'polish".

  36. He hasn't read the article either by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    If he had he would have seen screenshots of "those kinds of tasks" being "acomplished with a polished GUI"

  37. Not good. by glpierce · · Score: 1

    I can see it now - budget PCs sold with Linux to make them cheaper. Consumers who don't know/care about Linux get it and spend years complaining to everyone about how the computer can't do X and Y.

    --
    G
  38. Only works if.. by msimm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It doesn't inconvenience them. Otherwise you've just got an annoyed Microsoft customer using Linux cdroms as coasters.

    Might be good for people already familiar with Linux or who want to make the switch. But for a new user to convert its going to have to do something better then the current standard (which like it or not is Windows). Something that will actually positively effect their day to day use or give them some ragging rights. Like preinstalled MythTV.

    --
    Quack, quack.
  39. Re:Who cares about installation simplicity... by anagama · · Score: 4, Informative

    • How about cutting a CD - most burners ship with some sort of burning software for Windows (e.g. Nero 5). Under Linux say hello to 'mkisofs', 'cdrecord' and another HOWTO. If you want to burn an audio CD of MP3's, you're in a world of pain.
    Well, you haven't used K3b. I've used Nero before - truth is, K3b is easier. Literally a drag-drop-click-burn operation. For atypical data burns (or music), this is a great program.

    At the same time, I made a script to do my backups, mkisofs and cdrecord based. Being able to use the command line for these tasks is sometimes more convenient, at least for the repetitive ones. I just click the icon that runs my backup script, and I'm done, thanks to that ugly CLI.

    Pretty has its place. Function has its place. Linux gives you both.

    --
    What changed under Obama? Nothing Good
  40. Re:"Big Name"????? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Shuttle is the most successful manufacturer of small-form-factor PC hardware

    And what serious applications do these toys serve? Come on. They are neat, but no more serious computing than an xBox.

  41. Surprise: Troll does not read article. by waferhead · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Idiot,

    Mandrake* has had every item the moron mentioned covered to some degree for quite awhile now.

    *as well as every other distro, I use Mandrake myself since ~8.x days, (usually run cooker snapshots now though) Mandrake is usually ahead of SUSE as far as Desktop functionality, but it is a good race.

    I will withold any opinions on Fedora until I see it work right, perhaps they just need time, they seem to be getting there.

  42. MOD PARENT DOWN, GRANDPARENT UP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This guy works in tech support for Shuttle... check his post history!

  43. Woo by Agret · · Score: 0, Troll

    GO LINUX! DIE MICROSOFT! WOO!

    --
    Have you metaroderated recently?
  44. Linux on MSI Mega180 by GoRK · · Score: 1

    I am interested to see the kind of support available for Linux on the MSI Mega180 sytem. It should be fairly straightforward as it is nForce2, but I still wouldn't expect the LCD or remote to be easy to talk to -- might be a fun project to hack on...

  45. Shuttle Denies This at CES by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is very old info!

    When I was at the CES show in Vegas a few weeks ago, I asked Shuttle about Linux. They told me they had tried Mandrake but it was a "bad experience," so they went back to using XP.

    I don't think you can buy a Shuttle with Mandrake on it anymore.

    1. Re:Shuttle Denies This at CES by pehowland · · Score: 1

      Not true. Whoever you spoke to at CES was obviously uninformed. Not only are Shuttle shipping Mandrake with three of their XPC line, but they are also in the process of getting future machines accredited. I got that straight from Shuttle's director of marketing. (I'm the author of said article at Sudhian BTW).