Slashdot Mirror
Space Station Slowly Falling Apart?
Yoda2 writes "MSNBC discusses debris apparently seen by the crew floating away from the International Space Station. From the article, 'Such debris may include fragments of insulation, labels and possibly important components.' Yikes! Many of these quotes seem appropriate."
For those of you who can't get to it, don't worry--you didn't miss much. It's just a compilation of Scotty quotes, and contrary to the submitter's assertion, hardly any of them apply to the current situation.
Unless, of course, the ISS has warp drives.
Or is in the midst of battle with Klingons.
Obliteracy: Words with explosions
It's the INTERNATIONAL Space Station. So you can't go blaming the Americans even though they do contribute the bulk of the efforts towards the project.
Is this a nice way of saying that a slothful astronaut got sucked out into space?
True story.
Race: Payload checklist. IRS surveillance satellite --
Buzz: Check.
Race: Ant farm --
Buzz: Check.
Race: Children's letters to God --
Buzz: Check.
--- Deep Space Homer
include fragments of insulation, labels and possibly important components
Labels? Like "Canadarm" or "U.S.A." ? Please don't tell me there's a Taco Bell billboard up there too!
There goes the $10,000 wrench. There goes the $20,000 hammer...
There's a growing sense that even if The Future comes,
most of us won't be able to afford it.
-- Lemmy
No kidding. You could crash things into it and set it on fire and it was still usable!
Yet Another Web Site
This clearly has to be the bottle of finegrain Wodka I lost just the other day !
Slashdot: stuff for news, nerds that matter, matter for news, stuff that nerd
Cosmonaut
Astronaut
Cosmonaut
Astronaut
Cosmonaut
21908uje12~~!~~~
[END TRANSMISSION]
Trolling is a art,
I wonder if it is all coming from the space station. There must be a lot of crap up there now... unless decaying orbits take care of that sort of thing?
Perhaps it is a sneaky astronaut out there snapping pieces off to frighten the others... All in good fun.
The article clearly states the piece was from the Progress or Soyuz spacecraft docked to the Space Station. It is a part that locks down the solar panels on these craft.
HCG 50a = 2MASX J11170638+5455016
11h17m06.4s +54d55m02s
Interesting note, current ISS commander Michael Foayle was onboard Mir when they had the accident with the Progress vehicle. This guy seems to be really unlucky. It was Mir that was falling apart around him, this time it is ISS.
Yeah, Mir==Peace, apparently ISS==Piece(s)
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
1) I always knew that such an international collaboration is succeptible to fragmenting.
2) Someone send in Tom Ridge with plastic wrap and duct tape.
3) In ISS, the computers defrag you!
4) The ISS -- Modular programming at its finest.
5) ISS -- I could have sworn it was Apache Station
6) NASA is waiting for an official patch for ISS
7) Aussie quoted: "pull yourself together, mate! Yer fallin apart!"
8) ISS -- where do you want to fragment today?
Yes, it is station debris. The odds of anything passing within view of the crew is very, very small unless it came from the vehicle they are in. The kind of debris that is being talked about here (possibly launch stow clamps for Progress/Soyuz solar panels) is quite small and would be extremely difficult to see from greater distances. These parts are used to hold the solar panels in the folded position during ascent and are no longer needed once the spacecraft is in orbit and the panels unfold.
The station normally has a Soyuz docked (for crew escape) and a Progress docked (for resupply and refuelling and trash stowage.) That's four solar panels right there. In addition, the Russian station modules (except for the Pirs airlock) have their own solar panels, as they operated autonomously at first, and provided power to the US modules earlier in the assembly sequence before the larger US array was added.
The biggest worry is that one of these pieces could impact the station and damage it.
i am a soviet space shuttle
Objects in Mir are closer than they appear.
Ooops. Wrong station.
MSNBC discusses debris apparently seen by the crew floating away from the International Space Station.
The crew saw debris as they were floating away from the ISS!? It sounds like the more alarming story is the fact that the ISS is losing crewmen! :)
Information wants to be anthropomorphized.
A long while ago, somebody* called Mir "The Orbiting Space Barge of Death." Perhaps the ISS could be renamed "The International Space Barge of Death."
/. poll, but I couldn't locate the source.)
*(I wanna say it was from an old
That first paragraph prented as the headline is a bit inaccurate. Basically the article goes on to explain that the part in question is part of an explosive bolt, read, disposable. The space station is not falling apart as out slashdot editors would have us believe.
Images of the object were sent to the Russians, and the boltlike object looked familiar. "Preliminary info from Moscow indicates that the eyebolt may be from the Soyuz solar arrays," the NASA report said. "Four of them are used to safe the [solar array] during launch with a hook mechanism, which is released via [explosive bolt] after insertion [into orbit]. The bolts are secured with a nut and a locking wire, and apparently one of them came free."
The same bolts are used both on the Soyuz crew transport spacecraft and on Progress, the Russian-built cargo-only ship. Both vehicles are currently docked at the station, and NASA sources said Tuesday the Russians now believe the piece actually came off the Progress, which arrived at the space station at the end of last month. In the past, during periods of strong rhythmic thumping on an exercise device, the solar arrays on docked Soyuz and Progress craft can be observed to jiggle.
I'm sorry Dave, I can not do that. It fell off already.
my head injury from Skylab just cleared up 3 days ago, now I have to worry about this.
As a result, when you are in the station, you won't be able to find anything. This was a major issue with Mir and Skylab, probably it was with Salyuts as well. No one stows the experiment equipment once they use it, just straps it into a convenient location. If you do a space walk, the chances are it will be your first time outside of the space station and you will get lost, won't find what you are looking for and won't remember the training session you had a year ago in a boring, hot Texan day.
Labels are for convenience.