Slashdot Mirror


Xbox 2 Storage Supplier Says No Hard Drive

Loadmaster writes "Dov Moran of M-Systems, who recently closed a deal with Microsoft to provide 'customized memory units' for the next Xbox, spills the beans. He says Xbox 2 will not have a hard drive in an interview with the Israeli website Globes Online. No details on how their memory solution will replace the HDD, though." Regardless, Moran seems pretty confident in the agreement with Microsoft, so it's likely that the Xbox 2's storage system is now in M-System's hands. S!: Also worth noting is a GameSpot story which has an Xbox spokesperson claiming: "Mr. Moran is aimlessly speculating... we've made no such announcements about future Xbox products and services."

99 comments

  1. So what you're saying... by Snowspinner · · Score: 1

    So what you're saying is that Microsoft is totally abandoning their online strategy?

    That or they're selling the hard drive as an extra to squeeze more cash out of people.

    The first seems unlikely, the second is just bleh.

    Guess I'll stick to Nintendo.

    1. Re:So what you're saying... by MachDelta · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, they're purchasing a whackload of that Flash memory they used on the Mars rovers. That way, peoples Xboxes will randomly lock up and refuse to do anything unless a tech support guy 8000 miles away sends it a command.

      All in M$ style, of course.

    2. Re:So what you're saying... by Vampyre_Dark · · Score: 1

      So it's no different than any other windows box... Welcome to the family XBOX Next!

    3. Re:So what you're saying... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

      "So what you're saying is that Microsoft is totally abandoning their online strategy?"

      What? How does not having an HD mean they're abandoning online strategy>

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:So what you're saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ya, the PS2 network adapter/online network has a bigger userbase than Xbox Live and that doesn't have a hard drive built in...

    5. Re:So what you're saying... by a_peckover · · Score: 2, Interesting

      PS2 Online is utterly useless in comparison, though. It's a free-for-all mess, not disimilar to online PC gaming. You have to enter your internet settings seperately for each game, have different user accounts for different publishers, there's no cross-game invitation or buddy system etc. Compare that to the integration and relative simplicity of XBox Live.

    6. Re:So what you're saying... by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

      Umm... did they say there will not be a large capacity storage device in the xbox 2, or just not a conventional hard drive. That company makes storage media up to 47GB.

      Hell, a couple gigs of space should be plenty to store game saves and some extra maps, etc.

      I dont see what everyone is getting so worked up about. As long as its not like the current PS2 or Gamecube, who cares...

    7. Re:So what you're saying... by CaptMonkeyDLuffy · · Score: 1

      Well, if what you say about the online PS2 experience is true, then that really is pathetic. Even the Dreamcast allowed enter once, use for any game network settings...

      Not that the XBox doesn't have a really good setup as far as online console gaming goes.

    8. Re:So what you're saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not so bad. It's not as slick as xbox live perhaps, but it's free.

      And you don't have to enter in internet settings each time. You might have to make seperate logins. But your inet settings are setup on your memory card.

    9. Re:So what you're saying... by Acidic_Diarrhea · · Score: 2, Informative
      "You have to enter your internet settings seperately for each game"
      Wrong. The disc that comes with the network adapter saves all connection settings to the memory card when you set it up. Have you actually played a PS2 online game?

      "there's no cross-game invitation or buddy system etc."
      Wrong again. EA Sports games include a buddy system and cross-game invitation. You noted that you need different user accounts for different publishers. You should realize that there is integration of user accounts and buddy systems within a publishers set of games.

      "Compare that to the integration and relative simplicity of XBox Live."
      Compare that to the price. I get all the online coddling I need from Sony for $0.00. Yeah, it's a free-for-all, just like PC gaming, which is fine by me. Playing games on the Internet with my PC has never been especially challenging, certainly not so challenging that I need to pay money for someone to handle some of the details of it. But I guess there's a market for people who need a little extra help. ;-)
      --
      I hate liberals. If you are a liberal, do not reply.
    10. Re:So what you're saying... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      great job moderators - mod my post down as flamebait and let the post i was replying to stay at +2, false information and all. you're a fucking moron.

  2. Hard drive in some by bsharitt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm guessing that their base game unit will not have a hard drive, but they will have a more expensive deluxe PVR model that will have a harddrive.

    1. Re:Hard drive in some by Loadmaster · · Score: 1

      That's what most people think. It seems plausible since most games don't use the hard drive much. Halo and Morrowind use the caching feature, but most games don't. And the custom soundtrack feature isn't supported well, either. You're probably right that the hard drive will be an upgrade feature for PVR and media functions. I assume the memory installed will allow for cache and content downloads.

      Join the Air Force. Be a C-17 Loadmaster.
      Monthly A1C check - $1079
      Per Diem/Hazard Pay/Flight Pay/Tax Free - $2000
      Free beer from the AC while in Germany in the name of crew solidarity - Priceless

    2. Re:Hard drive in some by WorkEmail · · Score: 2, Interesting
      That is one possibilty, but I think they will want to keep things more simple than that. I know the games that are out for Xbox are made to recognize a HD. And they will want it to be backwards compatible, so I am guessing that when all is said and done it wil have a Hard Drive.

      I have read articles that speculate that the PS3's content will all be online, the games you will download, etc. So Maybe Xbox will try to do some of that as well, focus more on the downloading of material and less on the games being in stores. It only makes sense if they can pull it off, they pay no shipping, no middle man, you just download the games right from them and that would be it, the only thing the stores would stock is the actual console itself and controlers.I don't think this is practical anytime in the next few years. I would guess maybe about 2007 or so something like that wil be done.

      I am guessing the next Xbox will be the same exact thing almost, just more memory, faster memory, faster and bigger video card, and some new stuff to keep people from hacking it, and that will be about it. :)

  3. M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by ObviousGuy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I for one would love to see more solid-state parts used in these game consoles. The more moving parts a thing has, the more likely it is that those things will break. By removing them and replacing them with solid-state devices, it makes the failure rate of the these things due to hardware failure drop considerably.

    But that's just the consumer's POV.

    More to the heart of the matter, Microsoft would likely be doing this because of the inability of hackers to easily replace the contents of a DOC with their own personal OS image, be it Linux or NetBSD. The reprogrammable DOC is great in its ease of update, if you've got the programming hardware. Otherwise, you have to find a way using the existing OS to update the OS image. You can be sure that MS will make that close to impossible.

    But then again, I've never really cared about Linux on the XBox. It always seemed like one of those Everest platforms: you do it because it's there.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by Innominate+Milquetoa · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Microsoft would likely be doing this because of the inability of hackers to easily replace the contents of a DOC with their own personal OS image, be it Linux or NetBSD.
      Actually, I'd say it's to prevent people from putting their own 160G hard drives in and downloading game images to it. The XBox (not surprisingly) proved to be one of the easiest consoles to mod. There's even a purely software-based way to do it. Those who know this have approximately 2 legitimate copies of games (Halo and MechAssault), and about 30 illegitimate images sitting on their hard drives. A non-standard storage medium would make this kind of thing all that much harder.
    2. Re:M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by EnglishTim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Microsoft doesn't care about people putting other operating systems onto Xbox. It's not a big enough chunk of people to make any difference to them.

      The main thing that will concern them is cost. Hard drives are big and expensive - the hard drive is probably the most expensive component in the Xbox. If they can get rid of it, it makes a lot more financial sense to them.

      There is also the fact that the hard drive makes it easier to pirate games, but to be honest I don't think that's as big a problem as the sheer expense of it.

    3. Re:M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your theory falls apart when you consider that DOCs cost much more than equivalent HDDs, even in bulk. Especially in bulk.

      This isn't about keeping XBox prices cheaper. It must be something else. The question is, What?

    4. Re:M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Well, my argument would fall apart if Microsoft were going to put 8GB memory cards into Xbox 2, but I don't think that's likely to happen. If they're looking at taking the hard drive out of the Xbox, they'll be much more likely to put either a small internal flash card (32Mb?) and have the option to buy larger external memory cards that slot in , or perhaps even not have an internal card at all.

    5. Re:M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that if they wanted to pop a small flash card in there, they could make do with a simple CF card like many small devices do. But because they are going with M-Systems DOC (according to this report), there must be a reason. If that reason is not cost, and it can't be, then why would they choose the DOC over a more conventional and cheaper flash memory card?

      My guess is that the DOC is harder to replace and harder to upgrade for the average user than a similar CF card.

    6. Re:M-Systems Disk On Chip in there? by EnglishTim · · Score: 1

      Yes, I wouldn't be surprised if maybe they're going for some form of encrypted storage or something like that.

  4. Backward Compatibility? by aweraw · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So i guess this rules out any question of backward compatibility for Xbox games that make use of the hard drive... That is unless of course they stock the XB2 with 10G of flash memory, in which case, it's price tag is going to be astronomical... and what about the touted "Media Center" functionality of the Xbox? How will you rip your songs to the HDD if there isn't one?

    --
    5468652047616D65
    1. Re:Backward Compatibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      The M-Systems stuff is identical, interface-wise, to a hard disk.

      For the most part, at levels above the actual driver, nothing has any idea that it is reading and writing an IDE drive.

    2. Re:Backward Compatibility? by ottawanker · · Score: 2, Informative

      From their website, they offer the following sizes of their 2.5 Inch IDE Plus product:

      Capacity - Unformatted (MBytes) 256, 512, 1024, 2048, 3072, 4096, 5120, 6144, 7168, 8192, 9216, 10240, 12288, 14336, 16384, 18432, 20480, 22528, 24576, 26624, 28672, 30720, 32768, 34816, 36864, 38912, 40960, 43008, 45056, 47104

    3. Re:Backward Compatibility? by aweraw · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I have no doubt of that... but in terms of storage, how much is there going to be? Some games use swap space (though I'm not sure of the amount they utilize in terms of MB) I would expect that regardless of the hardware interface, they latency compared to an acctual hard drive will make them unplayable... In my experience, flash memory is *MUCH* slower than a fully fledged plater HD. Not to mention alot more expensive... The upside is, no moving parts to eventually wear down and fail...

      /rant

      --
      5468652047616D65
    4. Re:Backward Compatibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      From their website, the following is some performance information on the 2.5 Inch IDE Plus: Performance Burst Read/Write: 16.7 MBytes/sec DMA-2 transfer mode: Sustained Read: 8.3-8.7 MBytes/sec (up to 13MB/s with customize s/w) Sustained Write: 8.0-12.0 MBytes/sec PIO-4 transfer mode: Sustained Read: 7.3-7.6 MBytes/sec (r/w sector or multi 16 commands) Sustained Write: 7.7-10.1 MBytes/sec (r/w sector or multi 16 commands) Access time: 0.04 ms

    5. Re:Backward Compatibility? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't worry, flash memory wears out a lot faster than hard drives.

    6. Re:Backward Compatibility? by addaon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Check the price.

      That's a nice drive and all, if a bit small. But check the price.

      If XBox 2 is M-Sys, it's disk-on-chip.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
    7. Re:Backward Compatibility? by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      Well, at least this company gives you a 5-year warranty (I believe, the site seems to be awfully slow at the moment) on the flash drives. Hard drive manufacturers may give you 3 years, but the majority give you only 1. This tells me that M-Systems is pretty confident that their devices will last.

    8. Re:Backward Compatibility? by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      Statistically speaking, if a HDD is going to fail, it will be while under warranty. The same thing generally goes with any major PC component. Once you get through that, *most* hardware will keep on ticking quite fine for 10x longer, and in some cases more than that.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
    9. Re:Backward Compatibility? by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      Yes, unless it's an IBM that is...

      Either way, I don't really care about the data that's on the drive, or the hassle to put the data back on the drive, because this takes about 5 minutes of my time (remove connecters, unscrew drive, put in new drive, connect, run shell script), I just care about the drive itself. The data has all been backed up on another drive and on different media.

      The fact that I don't have to worry about replacing a drive (with out-of-pocket money) for 5 years instead of 1 year has HUGE peace-of-mind value for me. I don't want to have to spend the thousands of dollars for new drives anytime soon.

    10. Re:Backward Compatibility? by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

      The M-Systems stuff is identical, interface-wise, to a hard disk.

      For the most part, at levels above the actual driver, nothing has any idea that it is reading and writing an IDE drive.

      Um meta mods? Someone needs their account revoked for modding this guy down. This, if true sheds light on the subject and is an important peice of information for people thinking of buying Xbox 2.
      So... MOD PARENT UP!

    11. Re:Backward Compatibility? by YomikoReadman · · Score: 1

      Well, since as of right now, we have nothing to go by on flash memory based drives insofar as longevity is concerned, I can really only talk about HDDs. I've worked with them from just about every manufacturer, and have actually seen some that were older than I am. I'm sure you'll remember the gigantic 20mb drives that would fill 2 5.25" bays, right? I've seen several of those, perfectly functioning, complete with data on them. I'd rather have a cheaper component to replace, than a more expensive one any day of the week. Like I said in my previous comment; If a component such as your HDD is going to fail, it will be within the first year. After that so called break-in period, they will generally run for 100 years with no faults.

      --
      I have no regrets, this is the only path.
      My whole life has been "UNLIMITED BLADE WORKS"
  5. DVD rw? by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I wouldn't rule out MS putting in a re-writeable dvd drive. They retail under 100 bucks these days, so if they struck a deal with some company it could be rather cost effective.

    Games didn't really use the HD much anyways. And I bet one dvd-rw would be enough to hold all the extra game content you download for a very long time.

    1. Re:DVD rw? by Psykechan · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I wouldn't rule out MS putting in a re-writeable dvd drive.

      I would. Large rewritable removable media is the last thing that MS wants. Built in DVD-R just screams for piracy. Besides, it's also a hassle to consumers that would have to switch discs frequently.

      Look for extra game content to be stored online and distributed in a somewhat peer-to-peer model in the vein of BitTorrent. Be it a new multiplayer map or a single player campaign, the first user would download the content from the servers and the rest could get it from peers.

      They [rewritable DVD drives] retail under 100 bucks these days, so if they struck a deal with some company it could be rather cost effective.

      True. They may well be less than that in quantities but that doesn't automatically mean that they are cost effective. MS is finding the additional price for the built in hard disk drive in the current Xbox isn't cost effective and they probably get great deals on those.

      Games didn't really use the HD much anyways.

      From an end user standpoint, you're right. There are games that create obscenely large save games and a bit of downloadable content for others but aside from these (and custom soundtracks) the HDD doesn't seem to get much use.

      The truth is that many games, mostly first and second party games, use it for virtual memory or for spooling data. A good chunk of the Xbox OS, such as the dashboard, is also on the drive. Granted the Xbox 2 will have much more than 64MB of RAM but developers will just have to deal with no HDD. Those that are programming for multiple platforms may not even notice.

      An add-in hard disk drive could still be a viable option for games that absolutely need it but people will just have to plunk down more cash for it. Heck, people are already paying $200+ for Steel Battalion. Sony is banking on Final Fantasy XI to sell the PS2 HDD; MS could simply make it a requirement for Halo 3 if they want a maximum install base... and it's a bonus if it includes the ability to play old Xbox 1 games.

    2. Re:DVD rw? by ottawanker · · Score: 1

      I wouldn't rule out MS putting in a re-writeable dvd drive.

      Right, so then I can pirate the games using Microsoft's own console? They should put 3 or 4 rewritable drives in there so I can copy the game for my friends at the same time!

    3. Re:DVD rw? by bluGill · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Think Sega Dreamcast, IIRC many Sega games had two tracks, one normal CD track, and one higher density track. Build a two part DVD, the inner part normal pressed DVD, the outer part (basically whats left after your game) DVD+rw. All the game save files go on the disk, just like GBA cartrages store saved games. If you want to do game updates, just press only a loader and a couple graphics images, and burn the rest.

      This has a good anti-piracy measure: just turn the write laser on in the pressed part, and if there is anything left you know it is a real pressed disk and legitimate.

      Microsoft has the money to design such a disk, and setup the manufacturing. Volume sales might never make up for the costs, but they have already prooven they don't care about profit too much yet.

      Note that if I were going to design this I'd use a DVD-RAM for the writeable section, both because give more write cycles, and it is rare enough that most people can't write it. Do your lasers right, and even if someone manages copy a game to a rw (+/-), they won't be able to save any of their games.

  6. The only thing that is clear.. by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is that Dov Moran of M-Systems is a blithering idiot. To shoot off your mouth like that on a Microsoft deal has to be like pissing on the third rail. Especially after the SCO shit this morning.

    I predict he will be looking for a new job tomorrow.

    --
    "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
    1. Re:The only thing that is clear.. by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      Indeed, simply mentioning that the Xbox Next wouldn't have a hard drive is a bad, bad move. The next-gen console wars have already begun and I'm sure all three companies are holding back on some of their secrets (maybe the PS3 will surf the net, be a TiVo, play PS2, PS1, and PS3 games all in one?).

      Shooting off his mouth without confirmation, let alone permission (for all we knows it could be an add-on, a la headset or external transferable memory card, and not actually part of the Xbox Next since theres no real evidence other than his own word.) This guy just commited career suicide.

    2. Re:The only thing that is clear.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why should you care?

      The more people pissing Microsoft off, the better. Everyone involved explodes, which is amusing for those of us who have nothing to do with the situation.

      I would like to see this guy get fired. I would also like to see Microsoft spend the money to make sure that it happens. Then I would like to see this repeated many times to many otherwise good people.

    3. Re:The only thing that is clear.. by HotNeedleOfInquiry · · Score: 1

      Why should you care?

      I don't. Oh, and thanks for asking...

      --
      "Eve of Destruction", it's not just for old hippies anymore...
  7. other angles by JDizzy · · Score: 4, Informative

    Maybe Microsoft also is also looking for ways to lockdown the hardware, and prevent people from installing linux. Possibly using a more compact form of memory which they can control better. You know the old moto: "embrace and extend". Microsoft need only pervert something for their proprietary needs, and lockout reverse engineering.

    Another issue might be simply mechanical, hence the notion of reducing the need for moving parts. Since solidstate memory is increasing in capacity, and price. One cannot arge against the percieved advantage of having a hdd for large scale storage. I dump entire CD's to my xbox, and play them in games, or use the xbox as a primitive juke to play the entire collection. So possibly Microsoft is opening up an after market for add-on hard drives? Their stance being that you get "enough" storage for game-state saves, and if you need more get an add on memory module for your controller, or get the option hard drive. It certaily helps to leave space for the the extra hardware in the enclosure just in case they decide to include them later on (depending on what sony does).

    --
    It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    1. Re:other angles by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      You know the old moto: "embrace and extend".

      We know the motto, but it doesn't apply here, and you obviously don't understand it.

      The idea is that you subvert an existing standard by adopting it (embrace) then add non-standard features/capabilities/whatever (extend). Once people come to rely upon these proprietary capabilities, anything truly compliant with the regular standard is either less attractive to a consumer, or not an option for those who are "locked in" by a reliance on those features.

      Since there is no standard involved, there isn't anything to embrace, let alone extend.

      As many others have already posted, the most likely reason for this is to prevent piracy in the form of DVDs copied to the HDD (either the stock one, or an expanded one). That would probably indicate there won't be an HDD aftermarket. Except to whatever degree putting Linux on the XBOX helped pirates figure out how to circumvent piracy protections, Linux on the XBOX really isn't doesn't pose any sort of threat -- certainly not one worth a major hardware overhaul.

      But any anti-MS post is always good for a couple of positive mod points around here.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    2. Re:other angles by JDizzy · · Score: 1

      We know the motto, but it doesn't apply here, and you obviously don't understand it.


      I'm sure it makes you feel better to randomly belittle others. FYI: I belive my comments are valid, yet that you read them wrong, just blantantly cannot read? For example, MS desision to use solid state memory could be something as simple as CF form factor memory, with the pin out changed, or a different operational voltage. In other words embrace and Extend. It was just an example, and I was attempting to demontrate how they might have actually learned something from their last consol faux pax.

      I'd think the reasons for doing this are numerous, namely price reduction, and security. To speculate about the exact reason is a silly, as this probaly involves several domains of reason.

      Also, I'm not against MS in anyway, and I used to work at Microsoft several years ago.

      It was a nice attempt to troll though, better luck next time.

      --
      It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    3. Re:other angles by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      something as simple as CF form factor memory, with the pin out changed, or a different operational voltage

      That still isn't embrace and extend. That's just a purely custom solution which happens to have started life as a standard piece of equipment. Nothing about that would be a "threat" to anyone with an interest in the related standard -- which is the point of the "extend" part.

      Java is the popular example for embrace and extend. In that case, the Microsoft JVM was capable of running standard Java bytecode: embrace. However, MS added non-standard features, allegedly to "lock in" developers to their VJ product: extend. If it worked the way you describe it, the MS JVM wouldn't run standard JVM bytecode at all.

      I'm also not saying it's necessarily impossible to imagine an embrace-and-extend angle to this -- although nothing comes to mind, and it would be difficult to imagine a justification since standards worth controlling are few & far between in the console world -- I'm just saying I don't see any evidence of embrace and extend in anything you've brought up so far.

      If you feel belittled by that, sorry, but I still think you don't get it.

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

    4. Re:other angles by JDizzy · · Score: 1

      nice troll. You already proved you're an idiot with yoru previous comments, but this reply just confirms it. Obviously your narrow view of definitions is a mechanism for you to pump your own ego. It's always the idiots like you who are the loudest, and your just flapping hot air here. You can reply all you want, but trust me I'm not going to argue with a fool over what "embrace and extend" means to *you* ; Because I'm sure your 100% commited to that view point no matter how stupid it may be.

      --
      It isn't a lie if you belive it.
    5. Re:other angles by bugbread · · Score: 1

      Um...it's not a "narrow view of definitions", it's the actual definition. I mean, I don't complain if someone says the Sun is hot that their definition of "Sun" is narrow and that it should include ice cubes.

      Look, you didn't know what embrace and extend meant. Now you do. Just consider it a learning experience. Don't attack the poster for being a troll just because he was right and you were wrong.

    6. Re:other angles by zero_offset · · Score: 1

      Anybody feel like helping him with the definition of "troll"? :)

      --

      Slashdot quality declines as the number of hot grits posts decreases. - Provolt's Law, Apr-09-2005

  8. Piracy? by almaon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Is it just me, or is the concept of the Xbox 2 not having a hard-drive seem possible as a direct influence of piracy?

    With modchips and the internal drive, being able to play disk images right off the harddisk seems like this could be an issue for Microsoft.

    Fastest way to find a needle in a haystack? Burn down the haystack...

    Taking out the harddrive would be just that, elimating the problem.

    Course it could be just a cost factor, who knows. All arm-chair analtics...

    1. Re:Piracy? by NanoGator · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "Is it just me, or is the concept of the Xbox 2 not having a hard-drive seem possible as a direct influence of piracy?"

      No, not really. I think it had more to do with taking a loss on each unit and nobody making that effective of use of the drive. Piracy might be a distant 3rd.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    2. Re:Piracy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you sure on those priorities? Pirating Xbox games doesn't even require a mod chip(though having one does make it easier). It's not quite as simple as the Dreamcast, with simply downloading and burning a game, but of the current 3 consoles it's by far the easiest to pirate games for.

    3. Re:Piracy? by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      Fastest way to find a needle in a haystack? Burn down the haystack...

      Hey, that's a good idea. Way to think outside the box!

  9. I hope that they do by unixbum · · Score: 1

    I really do hope that they include the hardrive... It is the only reason i would buy a game console, otherwise you have to pay hundreds of dollars in accessories, and it adds general value to the console. It would be a typical microsoft move to not incorperate it.

    1. Re:I hope that they do by Daetrin · · Score: 1
      I really do hope that they include the hardrive... It is the only reason i would buy a game console, otherwise you have to pay hundreds of dollars in accessories, and it adds general value to the console. It would be a typical microsoft move to not incorperate it.

      Hundreds of dollars? Exactly how many memory cards do you buy? They're only $15 or $20 each i think, certainly not hundreds.

      Or is there some other accessory you think a built in hard drive replaces? An add-on hard drive certainly, but it's not that much cheaper to get in included that to buy it after the fact. Why do you think the Xbox is so much more expensive?

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
    2. Re:I hope that they do by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Repeated reminder... not everyone on Slashdot means the same thing by dollars. Here in Canada, first-party mem-cards can run $40. Five cards? Yes, I could easily need five cards.

      Even beyond that, 10 memory cards is not completely unreasonable, and certainly wasn't on the PS1. So hundreds is not an insane phrase. Would you prefer "dozens of dollars" or "scores of dollars"?

    3. Re:I hope that they do by prockcore · · Score: 1

      Here in Canada, first-party mem-cards can run $40. Five cards? Yes, I could easily need five cards.

      I don't think so. Here in the US Nintendo 250 slot memory cards cost $15.

      The average game uses 3-6 slots for a save game. So you're looking at about 25 save games for $15.

      I don't think you would ever need 5 cards.

    4. Re:I hope that they do by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      there are some GC games that want a memory card all to themselves (madden 2004). Just remember, as games get more complex so do the saves for those games. I only played my ps1 rarely, and i collected 4 save cards.

      aha. this was entertaining:

      http://forums.gamespot.com/gamespot/board/messag e? board.id=gcbasic&message.id=165485

    5. Re:I hope that they do by prockcore · · Score: 1

      there are some GC games that want a memory card all to themselves (madden 2004).

      True, but they're rare (Madden and Animal Crossing). and Animal Crossing comes with a memory card in the box.

    6. Re:I hope that they do by jasonbw · · Score: 1

      guess you missed these
      Hitman 2: Silent Assassin -59
      Sims, The - 60
      Sims: Busting Out, the -161
      Fifa Soccer 2003 -54
      NBA Live 2003 -103
      NCAA Basketball 2k3 -143
      NHL 2k3 -125
      Tony Hawk Pro Skater 4 -50
      SSX 3 -51

      seems the rare sports game is the one that uses less than 20 slots.

  10. anti-linux by FlashBuster3000 · · Score: 1

    I think it's obvious. They gonna build in a hdd that's called "XBOX superhyperdrive". The only thing that will change is the interface, so that no linux-driver exists and many people will have to stick to their old xbox-linux-router (until some guys figure it out, again).

    1. Re:anti-linux by FlashBuster3000 · · Score: 1

      i forgot to mention that the only change is, that the connector has an additional absolutely useless pin, so that conventional connectors don't fit.

    2. Re:anti-linux by cybermace5 · · Score: 1

      Unless M-Systems develops an entirely different memory technology, the Disk-On-Chip is well documented and is supported under Linux. You don't get a lot of storage space, but you could still put Linux on it.

      --
      ...
  11. No Influence, Here by Undefined+Parameter · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Well, it looks like I'm in the minority who don't believe this guy.

    I don't think he knows what he's talking about; the way that he keeps mentioning that he's looking out for the company's long-term survivability in regards to the company's track record of red ink reminds me of Tom Smykowski's nervous, angry interview with the Bobs in Office Space. The fact that he said that the Xbox 2 was going to have a "CD," not even a "CD Drive," rather than a DVD drive of some sort tells me that he's not at all familiar with what the specs of the Xbox 2 will be.

    If I read the article correctly, M-Systems has had a total of one quarter of profit in fifteen years of existence, and this quarter will have them back in red ink. It sounds to me like the poor guy's in the process of jumping ship ("I personally own a lot of shares in the company, and I sell shares every quarter....") but doesn't want the public shareholders to beat him to it, so he's trying to sell everything M-Systems is doing as a Real Big Thing(TM), which will bring in "hundreds of millions to the company, spread over a few years...." In other words, I don't think M-Systems is anywhere near as important in the Xbox 2 development process as Mr. Moran would like to have us believe.

    Then again, if such is the case we're back to square one with conflicting rumors and no solid statement from Microsoft either way. I'm hoping Microsoft does decide to include backward-compatability. If they don't, I'll not even begin to consider purchasing one for a few years.

    ~UP

    --
    Eat the Path.
  12. MOD PARENT UP by Neo-Rio-101 · · Score: 1

    Good thinking... and you're right.

    The PSX already has this feature!

    --
    READY.
    PRINT ""+-0
  13. Re:Give... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 2

    Roger this, when I bought my Xbox I had already planned to buy a PS3 with backward compatability, whichever console maker brings the HD wins, HD and PVR wins, HD PVR and Free online play teh win!

  14. Bullshit speculation by dstillz · · Score: 1

    I'm increasingly displeased with Slashdot Games, which posts unconfirmed rumors that have to do with insignificant details of next-generation console hardware. I don't care how many buttons the next PlayStation will have on its controller, or whether XBox Next will have a hard disk, especially if I can't be told for certain. Rumors are not "news for nerds, stuff that matters." I may move to exclude Games from my homepage, or to quit Slashdot entirely, not that you care.

    1. Re:Bullshit speculation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      [Randal]
      You'll be missed.
      [/Randal]

      (from Clerks, if you don't get it)

    2. Re:Bullshit speculation by TwistedGreen · · Score: 1

      No, please, don't go! I'll give you candy!

    3. Re:Bullshit speculation by kgbkgb · · Score: 1

      It's not like Slashdot Games gets a ton of good stories. As in any news reporting medium, when you lack lots of good stories, you get some filler.

      So unless you're claiming that they're overlooking important stories by paying attention to unimportant ones, then I say who cares? Just read the title and realize you don't want to read that article.

    4. Re:Bullshit speculation by dstillz · · Score: 1

      They are overlooking important stories. Seen any stories recently on how DirectX 10 is being developed, and what implications that has for XBox/XBox Next? Seen any stories recently on Sony's Cell technology?

  15. it's not cheaper by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i looked into SSD as a replacement for a hard drive a few weeks ago. m-sys was one of the MOST expensive out there. i'm talking on the order of a dollar a MEGABYTE. by 1997 standards, that's not bad... but you're talking 20 grand for a 20 gigabyte drive. it's cheaper PER MEG than the sony memory cards which are 8mb each at like $25 ... but, really, what the hell are you going to store on 8mb that'll make a difference?

  16. Re:Give... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't expect Xbox 2 to offer a PVR. Microsoft already tried playing with PVRs with their UltimateTV service, which flopped.

    And they can't just throw in the ultimate tv software, that's for set-top boxes, and runs the same OS as WebTV. They'd need to design something new, from the ground up, and I don't think they'd want to take the risk.

  17. Caching by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    The HDD don't get used much? So where do you think all that cached information from the game is going?

  18. Roger that by orthancstone · · Score: 1

    Although this isn't confirmed information (lack of HDD), I can say that I'm 99.9% sure I wouldn't buy Xbox 2 if it lacked a HDD.

    1. Re:Roger that by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      Did you buy the first Xbox?

      And if so, you know how important the HDD is. Do you think that they would just take that functionality out- without replacing it with something equally as good- or better?

      --
      No reason to lie.
    2. Re:Roger that by Ezrem · · Score: 1

      Why does it matter if it has the hard drive in it coming from the factory? Odds are that if it has a DVD or other optical media drive, it will still run on some kind of IDE interface, making it easy to add a hard drive yourself if you're the kind of person who wants to hack the box to do the things you want to do with it.

      Let's be honest - who actually uses the standard 8 gig hard drive when they're hacking their xbox anyway? Sure, for Linux it would be fine, but if you're serious about this, dropping another $40 on a cheap IDE drive is not going to be a big deal.

    3. Re:Roger that by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      Yes, I own the original Xbox...hence why I wouldn't purchase a new one without it. I use it a lot and would hate to not have its functionality.

    4. Re:Roger that by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      I have a bunch of CDs on my drive, so I'm fairly certain I use a large amount of my drive.

    5. Re:Roger that by bigman2003 · · Score: 1

      But my point is that they will maintain the same functionality.

      That is like someone saying 3 years ago "I won't buy a Gamecube, because it doesn't take cartridges. The N64 takes cartridges, and my next console needs to also take cartridges!"

      Or, maybe a PS2 owner not wanting to buy an Xbox (first version) because "none of my frieds with an Xbox uses memory cards. I use memory cards on the PS2 all the time, and nobody uses them on the Xbox, so it must suck."

      My point is that we are looking to the future, and they may have something totally different, new, and better up their sleeve than a hard-drive. Because without some sort of re-writeable mass-storage, much of the functionality that makes the Xbox great will be gone.

      Rather than painting a grim picture of the future Xbox without a hard-drive, imagine if your Xbox was SMALL and QUIET. Wouldn't that be answering some of the 'problems' with the current Xbox?

      Personally- I don't particularly want a hard-drive in the next Xbox. I want something even BETTER.

      --
      No reason to lie.
    6. Re:Roger that by orthancstone · · Score: 1

      Um, the size and noise of it is no problem for me. Furthermore, I store cds on my hard drive for in game play. Will a memory key be able to handle this decent?

      Most importantly, lack of a hard drive will pretty much guarantee no backwards compatibility. That is yet another selling point I want to see in future consoles.

      I hate memory cards (always have); gimme a hard drive anyday.

  19. I talked with a few Microsoft execs by gruntled · · Score: 2, Informative

    over the past week for a story on cheating online that's running Monday in the SJMN. Some tidbits: One fellow told me that MS folks were "extremely surprised" by the Linux hacks. Another fellow told me that the hard drive has been "critical" for pushing patches down the pipe.

  20. Ummm...Everyone missing the obvious here? by GameNutz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Ok, the obvious answer here is:

    Microsoft wants out of the office and onto the TV. Steve Ballmer has always stated that there is a bigger play for the XBox outside of video games. Would not be suprised to see a windows component for the xbox that allows, over your home network, to stream media from your pc to the tv. The HD for the XBox will be your PC.

    This is a model that they have been pushing on for quite some time now and by tethering the 2 together, they reinforce their position in the home requiring XBox users to run Windows on their pc for the additional features the platform provides.

    You heard it here first.

    -GN

    1. Re:Ummm...Everyone missing the obvious here? by gruntled · · Score: 1

      Nice as an option, but frankly running any kind of a feed from my xBox in the living to my PC in my office and back to my TV next to the Xbox would be somewhat problematic. (Okay, at the moment I am back in a dorm room with my laptop scraping up against my TV/XBox/TiVo, but you get my point...)

    2. Re:Ummm...Everyone missing the obvious here? by Laur · · Score: 1
      Nice as an option, but frankly running any kind of a feed from my xBox in the living to my PC in my office and back to my TV next to the Xbox would be somewhat problematic.

      If you use XBox Live then you probably already have your XBox hooked up to your home network or router. You don't need to run the feed back and forth as you claim, you just need a single run of CAT 5, or you could go wireless. I use my XBox (running Linux) to stream media from my Linux fileserver all the time.

      --
      When you lose something irreplaceable, you don't mourn for the thing you lost, you mourn for yourself. - Harpo Marx
    3. Re:Ummm...Everyone missing the obvious here? by gruntled · · Score: 1

      yeah, but most people aren't running XBox Live. I guess it's possible that MS could say that the next generation box will require high speed access to work at all, but that seems unlikely.

  21. The Conspiracy Part by superpulpsicle · · Score: 1

    The main reason why M$ fear the hard drive is the compatibility with PC. They don't want some techie to put something on a disk while it is in the PC, then transfer it over to the Xbox. Last thing M$ wants to hear is an unstable console.

  22. Game Saves On Line and Hardware Expansions by Dooferlad · · Score: 1

    It makes sense to do away with having your console being the place where your saves games are and tie it to an on line player profile. Mobile profiles are possible with memory cartrages but it involves hassle. Being able to continue your Halo campaign around your friends place by entering your login details is far nicer than having to take anything physical with you.

    The possiblilty of custom settings for all your games being instantly accessable to you as long as you have a net connection is a great idea, but I don't know if MS are removing the hard disk for this reason. It is possible that because they are moving into the home entertainment business they will want to sell you a PVR as well. If this was a software addon to the XBox 2 then you could pirate it, but it is harder when there is no hard disk. If they get the PVR expansion to authenticate against the XBox 2 (which would basically be a video in and a hard disk in a matching box) then they keep the option secure. Of course you would have to hack your XBox 2 to get the new encoder working if they did hardware authentication anyway, but as has been pointed out no hard disk is a great cost saving. Selling a hard disk as an extra to turn your XBox 2 into a media centre (for which they all ready have an OS) is a good business idea. Of course nobody will want one if it is as ugly as the current XBox.

    Myself I will stick with emulating classics and MythTV (when I get it working, KnoppMyth will either receive praise or curses tomorrow when I erase Windows from my PVR).

  23. Re:Give... by PeeweeJD · · Score: 1

    just because it is not a hard disc drive does not mean they wont have multiple gigs of storage.

  24. Re:Give... by Deliveranc3 · · Score: 1

    Frankly sir, microsoft doesn't even need to offer me a bios. That's where free online gaming comes in :)

  25. XBox Starting Over by blueZhift · · Score: 1

    Given the news we've all heard of the Apple based dev kits and now the lack of a hard drive, it seems pretty clear to me that Microsoft has decided to start over again on the XBox.

    This can be a good thing of course, because in some sense it means that they are serious about making a real games console this time. Not that the first attempt was so bad, but they have learned from their first foray into the console business.

    One thing they have learned is that they need to keep costs low and make things small and cute (kawaii..;-)). Dumping the hard drive is one way to do this. The hd wasn't being used for much anyway, not enough to make it standard issue. On the other hand, the broadband connectivity has been a big hit.

    My guess is that the flash memory storage will be at least 128MB standard. They will also, as others have speculated here, likely provide online storage. Having dumped Asheron's Call duties, they may have additional capacity for simple storage. Another benefit for MS is of course making more bucks selling memory cards. See, they've learned!

    Finally, I would speculate that they are getting some design help from Apple, or the Apple connected. If this is true, expect one very sexy little console late next year in time for XMas (especially if you see a price drop to $99 late this year). A sleek little machine will help them in Japan too, where the XBox's large size was another strike against it. If my wildest speculations are right, the devil better'd bundle up because we could see Gates _and_ Jobs unveil the new machine together!

    1. Re:XBox Starting Over by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh come on. How hard would it be to keep backwards compatibility?

      The Apple kits? The G5 has more GPRs than any i386, and the Altivec can hold more data than the i386 FPU. Microsoft now owns Virtual PC so they have inhouse technology to do the translation. Just so long as they have enough extra speed and memory, which isn't that hard.

      The missing hard drive? Replace it with SDRAM. A lot of people have been wondering what could replace a 10GB hard drive. XBox games don't write over the whole drive! Each game is alloted one of three game caches from the disk, and these are 750MB each. Can you imagine 768MB of RAM? I sure can.

      Let's be generous: 1GB of RAM. XBox2 games can use the whole thing, while Xbox1 games get their game cache plus 64MB of RAM the original XBox had and there's plenty of room left over for Virtual PC to run in.

      Playing ripped music? Microsoft will simply stream songs off your Windows Media Center over your (preferably wireless) network which is what they should've done in the first place.

      ATI hardware versus NVidia? XBox games are statically linked against DirectX which makes this a bit of a challenge. Basically, there's one function that they call which returns the appropriate DX object. They need to trap that one call, which is hard because it's been statically linked and there's no symbol table. The good news is that these games will be running under Virtual PC to begin with, so they will be able to identify the appropriate assembly code before running it. Realize that the compiler for XBox games is always MSVC++ so the byte pattern can be hardcoded in. Once they identify this call, they can substitute a different DX object where the vtable links to the proper NVidia drivers.

      You're dead right about the memory cards. This is where your extra save games go. No idea whether they'll have any real solid-state storage or just ship with one flash card in the box when you buy.

      This is pure speculation on my part, but if I were involved, this is how I would do it. How hard would it be to keep backwards compatibility? Not nearly as hard as you think.

  26. 3 steps by djpandemonium · · Score: 0

    1: dont sell with drives 2: wait 3 months after launch then offer expensive hard drives 3:profit