DARPA Grand Challenge Kicks Off March 13th
GillBates0 writes "A quick reminder that the DARPA Grand Challenge is due to kick off March 13, the coming Saturday." He points to this "quick recap of the teams participating in the event," as well as details about the available satellite feeds. "The Atlanta-Journal Constitution is running a story about the event today. Quoting Frank Dellaert, co-director of Georgia Tech's robotics lab from the article, 'I would have trouble driving some of these roads myself. I think it's beyond the capabilities of autonomous vehicles today.' (shameless school plug). We'll see if the participants can prove him wrong."
Iphtashu Fitz adds a link to the New York Times' coverage of the trans-Mojave race, whose participants include "among other things a seriously tricked out motorcycle. The race is being run by the Pentagon, who is offering a $1 million prize to the builders of the first robot to successfully navigate a 200 mile route across the desert. ... a blog on ScienceBlog about the race has just started as well."
So anyone planning on hi-jackin... uh I mean borrowing some equipment thats just rolling around the desert? Nobody is physically standing there watching right?
They're looking in the wrong place. I see a half dozen idiots drive "autonomously" to work everyday while eating, reading the frickin news paper, shaving, applying make-up, etc.
Researchers should be looking to these people for the artificial intelligence that they need!
rejected (19) accepted (0)
Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
I would have trouble driving some of these roads myself
The real problem is that his turn signal is on for 150 of the miles and confuses all the autonomous vehicles.
In vaguely related news, this Friday, my Eng Phys class (okay, not mine, I did it last year) is requiring the students to slalom autonomous vehicles around pylons of arbitrary position (though powered devices are allowed on top).
As I said, I did the course last year (it was easier at the time), and let me tell you, it's harder than it looks. Hats off to anyone who even comes close to finishing this.
...I read the articles and found out that there would be no hack-saw blades nor pneumatically controlled spike hammers.
Now that would be an autonomous vehicle I'd pay to see.
rejected (19) accepted (0)
Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
Is to prove to the pentagon that terrorists with a million dollars in funding can't build this.
Unfortunately, no one will will this contest.
Red Team: "Muahaha! Bow before the greatest CS school in the universe and our giant Hummer that is smarter than you!"
Blue Team: "Feh! We can beat you with two wheels tied behind our backs!" *obscene gesture*
Red Team: "Come a little closer and say that."
How will these robots be routed around wilderness areas generated by the California Wilderness Protection Act?
Wasn't the Barstow to Vegas motorcycle race cancelled due to declaration of these same wilderness areas? How is DARPA ensuring these vehicles aren't going to run over some tortoise?
Dont' get me wrong, as I'm no tree-hugger. However, it seems the Wilderness protection act only applies to people who cannot afford a congressman...
I want one of these for Christmas, damnit! You could run over your neighbor's house with that mo fo...
All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
At least two other teams have formally dropped out, and we expect some no-shows.
CMU is the favorite. Fifty people, $3.4 million spent to date, direct support from aerospace companies, and a team leader who expects people to work all night, day after day. (Read the article in the current Scientific American.) But their technology is rather disappointing. The whole route is preplanned by hand, using a bunch of people at workstations in a big trailer with maps obtained by overflying the route with LIDAR-equipped reconnaissance aircraft. It's not very autonomous. They found a loophole in the rules and exploited it very effectively. There's no breakthrough there.
Anthony Lewandosky, with his self-balancing motorcycle, has the most innovative technology. We've met him, and are impressed.
Palos Verdes High School has a viable entry, using a Honda Acura. We've loaned them some hardware. They've had autonomous driving working for months. They started by having handicapped driving control actuators put into a car, which simplified their mechanical problems. They debugged using a golf cart. Very nice work.
Caltech tried to qualify today, but their vehicle made an unexpected turn and bumped into something. They get a second chance on Wednesday.
Most likely, no one will finish. Nobody has really done enough field testing yet.
John Nagle
So how does the favored team train for a 210 mile race through the Mojave Desert?? Why, by testing it in the SNOW of course!
Is it just me, or are these entries too complex?
I admit I haven't made anything like this (although I've made some very advanced machines before) but it seems to me that a half-dozen laser range-finders connected to a laptop would do just nicely.
You could tell how far you were from the left/right of the road, and how far in-front of you an obsticle or change in terrain is (and can slow-down appropriately).
I suppose you'd also have to throw-in a $200 GPS reciever, since they have a "course", and you'll need to do more than just follow the road. But that seems to be all you'd need to accomplish this (yes I'm glossing over the basics, because they're just the basics).
So please, find fault in my idea. I'd like to know why this $5000 solution wouldn't work, and why 3+ million is required.
Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
I'm disappointed that there is not more information available about this event as it happens. I've been following it vicariously for months, and now I'd like to hear about what is happening at the speedway in Fontana. How many teams showed up? How many tried out today? Which passed, which failed? I haven't been able to find out any of that information.
The so-called Science Blog article was from February 10! That's not exactly timely, is it?
Nagle's later posting here does present some information about Caltech. The Caltech team web page provides the same basic info, with a little different spin. But I guess we're lucky they posted today; the previous entry on the team's news page was dated November 16, 2003.
CMU has been updating almost every day, but their last entry was Saturday, saying "The curtain goes up Monday morning". Again, what happened?
You'd think in this age of bloggers, when every windbag on the net sees fit to tell us what he had for lunch that day, someone would be watching this event and posting some updates in the evening. If this isn't happening, I beg anyone who is attending to step up and start writing! Maybe I'm spoiled by the usual instant access to information, but I'm passionately interested in this event and starving for news.