Slashdot Mirror


Microsoft Rereleases Patch to Fix Problems

AbdullahHaydar writes "From CRN: 'One day after releasing a fix for an Office XP flaw, Microsoft upgraded the severity of the vulnerability to critical and re-issued a new patch to address a new attack scenario discovered in the last 24 hours.' The funny thing is that the second bug they missed with the first fix is 'critical' whereas the original bug the fix was for is 'important.'"

27 of 226 comments (clear)

  1. The problem.. hmm... by thrillbert · · Score: 5, Funny
    I love that headline.. a patch to fix problems.. great.. I'll apply it to my marriage, my job, my car, my bank account (too little money could be a problem).. and I'll apply it twice to my teenage daughter for better results..

    I knew eventually microsoft would do something right...

    ---
    Universe, n.:
    • The problem.
    1. Re:The problem.. hmm... by El · · Score: 1, Funny

      'll apply it twice to my teenage daughter for better results. The question is, how many times will your teenage daughter have to apply the patch to you? (My own daughter is 3 and I can't wait until she's a teen... in fact, I can't wait until she stops trying to pull me out of my chair while demanding over and over that I come play with her... your teenager doesn't still do this, does she?)

      --

      "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

    2. Re:The problem.. hmm... by frenetic3 · · Score: 3, Funny
      I'll apply it twice to my teenage daughter for better results..
      No sweat dude, I already took care of it.

      ...okay, okay, I'm going to hell... :)

      -fren
      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    3. Re:The problem.. hmm... by shadowbearer · · Score: 3, Funny


      Yeah, but can this patch help me drop my nicotine habit?

      *grumbles*

      SB

      --
      It's old. The more humans I meet, the more I like my cats. At least they are honest.
  2. So now there's four 'R's? by NecroPuppy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Retry, Reboot, Reapply, and Reinstall...

    --
    I like you, Stuart. You're not like everyone else, here, at Slashdot.
    1. Re:So now there's four 'R's? by WorkEmail · · Score: 3, Funny

      MS releasing patches reminds me of a cartoon character trying to stop a dam from leaking where they are stretching and using poles and brooms and all of their fingers and toes to stop all of the little water leaks.

  3. This is consistent by El · · Score: 4, Funny

    Remember, to Microsoft it is not an important problem unless they already have a fix for it!

    --

    "Freedom means freedom for everybody" -- Dick Cheney

  4. 24 hours by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    Wow, that's fast.

  5. Re:It ain't necessarily so by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm no apologist for MS (see my posting history :-), but re-relasing a new patch at a higher security classification ought to be applauded, not ridiculed.

    Applauding Microsoft for having to re-release a patch is like applauding Idi Amin for only eating some dude's skin and muscles and not his intestines or eyeballs. Or applauding Paris Hilton for having the good sense to only videotape herself having regular and oral sex and not anal sex.

    GMD

  6. Facts of life? by nmoog · · Score: 4, Funny
    "People have resigned themselves to this being a fact of life. "
    Life, death, taxes, and patching flaky patches.
  7. Uh.... by mrseigen · · Score: 2, Funny

    So what, they did a dupe?

  8. Apache OS by Eberlin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, ok, patching is a part of life -- that's understood. We have to patch our Linux installs too, after all. However, the Linux community doesn't seem to wrap itself in this strange PR shroud that MS does. You know the one -- how hackers are good for testing MS software and then how hacks aren't found until after MS releases a patch...oh and this business about making patch management easier by bundling patches monthly instead of releasing them sooner to protect their customers from harm.

    Right. So here we have a patch that should've probably been QA-ed to death (since they're doing this monthly instead of knee-jerk) and then later issuing another patch to properly plug the hole.

    I guess after they um...opened the source to some of Windows, they're only following suit by doing the "Release early, release often" mantra. Next thing we know, they'll be sponsoring Linux-friendly news sites and even exhibiting in Open Source conventions.

  9. that patch must be huge by minusthink · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Microsoft Rereleases Patch to Fix Problems"

    all of them?

    --
    "when life gets complicated, I like to take a nap in a tree and wait for dinner" - Hobbes.
    1. Re:that patch must be huge by dynamo · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, the EULA reads 'Caveat Emptor'.

  10. Re:It ain't necessarily so by THE+ROCK · · Score: 4, Funny
    Or applauding Paris Hilton for having the good sense to only videotape herself having regular and oral sex and not anal sex.


    I for one DO applaud Paris Hilton for doing just that. After all, videotaping yourself having ANAL sex and having it leaked all over the internet might get a little embarrasing for her. Good thing she didn't let things go THAT far!

  11. Great choice of article by mattgreen · · Score: 4, Funny

    I applaud the Slashdot editors once again in choosing a relevant and timely news story. Never before has a patch been reissued. This is surely a momentous day on the Internet.

    Plus we can have a chance to talk about how our favorite operating system would never do such a thing! This IS a great post!

  12. Excuse me... by Quinn_Inuit · · Score: 5, Funny

    "The funny thing"? The funny thing? That's like walking out of a Monty Python show and saying, "Man, that one joke was really funny."

    --

    Stop learning! Only you can prevent esoterrorism.
  13. attention moderators by GunFodder · · Score: 3, Funny

    Please moderate this story as both "Redundant" and "Flamebait" (definitely not clever enough to be a "Troll"). What, we're not allowed to moderate stories? Sounds like Slashdot needs a patch...

  14. My copy of Office must not need the patch... by pdcryan · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...because when right click on the paperclip and ask it if there is a security problem... and he told me Word already had security features.

    Thank god!

    --
    Ryan Kennedy opposes comm
  15. Re:It ain't necessarily so by dnoyeb · · Score: 2, Funny

    whew. I was just about to check it out for myself. But since I know its raunchy thanks to you, I can spare myself :)

  16. Re:It ain't necessarily so by Phexro · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's a hot thing to do in bed if you're a slutty shaved blonde worth $30m.

    It is not a hot thing to do if you're a 300lb, hairy, sweaty slashdot nerd 'flying solo.' I beg you, slashdot readers, don't video tape yourselves in bed.

  17. My question is... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    So does this patch require a restart? Because I'd hate to lose my 8 hours of uptime.

  18. I grow weary... by Epistax · · Score: 4, Funny

    of these threatening severity levels. I will install no patch less severe than "orgasmic" or possiblity "chocolicious".

  19. New Service Pack by CycoChuck · · Score: 4, Funny

    I heard that MS is releasing a new SP for Office that would fix all the problems. They're calling it OpenOffice. The new Windows SP, code named Linux, is suppose to be released soon as well.

    --
    Windows is as solid as quicksand.
  20. Nice headline by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    My first thought was, "Damn, that would be a tremendous patch."

  21. What Else is a Patch For? by handy_vandal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Microsoft Rereleases Patch to Fix Problems

    Well, that's a relief -- could be worse -- imagine a headline that reads "Microsoft Rereleases Patch to Cause Problems" ....

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
  22. critical second patch by natex84 · · Score: 2, Funny

    the second patch was critical? whaddya bet it fixed a new, more serious hole introduced by the first patch? :P