Slashdot Mirror


Is Security Holding VoIP Back?

phoneboy writes "Voxilla is running a piece I wrote on security issues present in Voice over IP. While an increasing number of people are ditching their ILEC in favor of using Voice over IP from companies like Vonage, VoicePulse, Packet8, and Broadvox Direct, there are a number of potential security issues to be aware of. Is VoIP secure enough to replace the PSTN as we know it?"

7 of 181 comments (clear)

  1. Re:I don't wnat VoIP by Phekko · · Score: 3, Funny

    Agreed. That's why there should be Slashdot via carrier pigeons, dammit!

    --

    Sigs for Nerds. Sigs that Matter.
  2. secure? by loraksus · · Score: 5, Funny

    like PSTN 2 aligator clips and a regular handset secure?
    Hell, when I *ahem* hung around people who beiged boxed we didn't even have aligator clips. Holding onto the wires was cool until a the phone rang ;)

    --
    1q2w3e4r5t6y7u8i9o0pqawsedrftgthyjukilo;p'azsxdcfv gbhnjmk,l.;/
  3. Re:As opposed to the security of PSTN? by firstadopter.com · · Score: 4, Funny

    Agreed, nothing is inherently secure as the FBI's new proposal for wiretapping comes out.

  4. Crappy service is holding VOIP back by bhny · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've had a ridiculous number of problems with Vonage, never any worries about security.

  5. 911 by RoadkillBunny · · Score: 3, Funny

    I see 911 as the biggest problem. If you are sharing the phone line with a normal internet, and you need to call 911 while someone decides to download the RedHat ISO's, you are in trouble.

    --
    Cheers,
    RoadkillBunny
    1. Re:911 by Spaham · · Score: 2, Funny

      Well, I'd say you were ALREADY in trouble if you needed to call 911 in the first place... ^_^

  6. What we need by chunkwhite86 · · Score: 2, Funny

    is something with the versatility of SSH, but that works on UDP. That would answer this problem.

    --
    I'd rather be a conservative nutjob than a liberal with no nuts and no job.