Slashdot Mirror


Sharp Debuts New Transmeta-based Laptop

kpogoda writes "Transmeta's new Efficeon processor will debut today within a new trim and slim Sharp notebook. In case you don't remember, the processor family is known for its extremely low power consumption and blazingly high computing speeds."

19 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Blazingly high? by lbolla · · Score: 5, Informative

    "The notebook's standard battery will last three hours under normal conditions. An extended battery will add six more hours of computing time and 0.6 pounds, Hanly says." It doesn't seem very different from a common laptop... batteries' life is still a big problem.

    --
    Computer are useless: they can only give you answers. - Pablo Picasso
  2. Re:Blazingly high? by lintux · · Score: 5, Informative

    That's the Crusoe chip. These machines have a new chip, the Efficeon. Quoting from the article:

    "The new Efficeon TM8600 is designed to improve performance while maintaining the low power consumption required by ultraportable notebooks--such as the 2-pound MM20. Sharp's tests showed that Efficeon delivers about 1.4 times the performance of Crusoe, Hanly says."

    I don't know if 1.4 times the Crusoe should be considered fast, but at least it's faster...

  3. Re:Blazingly high? by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Hanly says." It doesn't seem very different from a common laptop... batteries' life is still a big problem.

    Well sorta, the big buy here is that you get that much life from a significantly smaller/lighter battery. Note the presence of the physically larger "extended life" battery. Battery life isn't the "problem", or more accurately the tradeoff, it's the size (which in this case does matter).

  4. Re:Blazingly high? by millahtime · · Score: 5, Informative

    "It doesn't seem very different from a common laptop... batteries' life is still a big problem."

    If you look at the weight of the laptop 2 pounds for the 3 hours and 2.6 pounds of 6 additional hours. That is lighter than a conventional laptop. Hell, my battery prolly weighhs 2 punds for 3 and a half hours. So this does use less power. The battery is just smaller.

  5. Not that fast by linux_warp · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I love their products, the slashdot title of "blazingly high" clock speeds is a little misleading.

    From the article: "A base configuration of the notebook includes the 1-GHz Efficeon processor, 512MB of memory, a 20GB hard drive, and a 10.4-inch display for an estimated starting price of $1499. Sharp will take preorders for the notebook as of Monday, and it will ship in April."

    So we are looking at around 1ghz.

    1. Re:Not that fast by random_rabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's no reference to blazingly high clock speeds, just computing speeds. Remember clock speed!=compute speed.

    2. Re:Not that fast by auzy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thats not strictly true.. On a speed/watt basis, efficeons are by far the best. It also depends on what ur doing.. The VLIW architecture auto optimises, so some things will run very well on efficeons (and they get faster as they run).. Also, unlike the intel and AMD mobile processors, efficeons aren't just some hacked up processor designed for something else.. The 3 hours of computing on even the centrino's isn't great when u consider that the transmeta's last about 12 hours, and chances are u wont use ur laptop to play doom3 either

      He is right though.. the efficeons are fast.. not as fast as the pentium-m's or mobile AMD's, but a very decent speed, gets faster as it runs and awesome battery life make transmeta processors a very good choice..

      Could be wrong, but transmeta's I think dont need fans, so they are also very silent.

      People should remember that the future of computers is clustered CPU's (like openmosix) and wireless, to share CPU power, so in that point of time u wont need much CPU (cause u will just leech it off other computers on the wireless network if u need it) and when that happens, the only reason why the CPU will matter is for when u aren't connected to a network... still, 1GHZ, or more processing power is definately sufficient (my laptop only has 850 P3, which I'm surviving off easily, even with gentoo). Its no athlon 64 FX, but honestly, if u need that kind of power just buy a workstation...

  6. Re:Blazingly high? by akintayo · · Score: 5, Informative

    No 1.4 times Crusoe is not fast, since the Crusoe was/is kinda slow. Anyway the comment implied that the line was fast, but as stated in the linked article the Crusoe was panned for its performance.

    --
    Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
  7. Celeron comparison by PingKing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does this chip compare with that other energy-saving chip, the Celeron?

    And more importantly, is there any reason you'd choose a Transmeta-powered rig over an Intel one?

    --

    Patriotism - the last resort of scoundrels.
    1. Re:Celeron comparison by tugfoigel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not choose a Transmeta powered port-a-box? What's the difference what's inside as long as you can run you necessary proggies? Does it really matter if AMD or Intel is inside? Does it really matter that it's Transmeta? How could you even tell, provided your software behaves as expected?

    2. Re:Celeron comparison by slackr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Centrino is not a chip. It is a "system" comprised of three parts:
      Intel(R) Pentium M processor
      Intel(R) 855 Chipset Family
      Intel(R) PRO/Wireless Network Connection
      Basically, Intel repackaged and "branded" some existing technologies in an effort to squeeze out other wireless hardware manufacturers (if it ain't Intel WiFi, you can't call it "Centrino," and a successful branding campign makes people want Centrino whether or not they know what it actually is).

      Anyway, your question is stil valid, but to technically nitpick it's really about the Pentium M processor.

      More info:
      http://intel.com/products/mobiletechnology/ demo/wo rks.htm?iid=ipp_demworks+tab&

      --

      * Please do not read my signature.
  8. Not what it is all about by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The CPU is just one component that eats electricity in a laptop; the other big hog is the back lit screen.

    Do you really need much compute power in a walk-about machine to do email, web browsing, word smithing ? In a trade off give me battery time over machine horsepower every time.

    I think that many people have a laptop for ease of use (all your files not backed up in one place that moves with you) and expect the laptop to do everything. What I like is those laptops that drop performance in battery mode.

  9. Slow Computers by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know what everybody is complaining about with these being slow chips. THey should really start to look at the trade-offs. Do they want to lug around an 8 pound laptop, with 3 hourse of battery life, just so they can say they have a 2.4 GHz laptop, or would they rather carry around a 2.6 pound laptop with 6 hours of battery life (weight with extended battery), and have to run things just a tinsy bit slower. I've found that provided the system have a good amount of memory, a pentium 2 is good enough to run most applications.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
  10. Don't forget heat... by Lord+Haha · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned this, Transmeta's tend to run alot cooler then Intel/Amd...

    I know personally after sitting in a class at university with my Dell my legs feel like they are about to melt. Anyways Transmeta has exact stats on the site but its somewhere around 1/4 of the heat output, personally thats why I am considering a Transmeta next round....

  11. Re:How will Linux do on this, I wonder.. by distributed · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I think the question should rather be...

    Whether linux is well optimized for x86 arch.

    since these chips use a VLIW core for the actual processing with the x86 instructions being compiled on the fly to the vliw code.

    Maybe if the linux kernel was compiled to take better advantage of instruction level parallelism the code morphing engine(the x86 to vliw compiler) could actually run linux much faster.

    But then that would be doing some part of the code morphing engines job at the compiler level... nothing wrong with that except you would have to write an entirely new compiler.

    plz correct me if i am wrong. (any comp arch gurus around)

    --
    [all generalizations are untrue except this one]
  12. People don't get how thin these are by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Informative

    At CES, they had one, and it was absolutely dwarfed by my Nokia 6360 phone. Take a look:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13578
    While the phone is a 'big' one the laptop was thinner, and it weighed nothing. Very cool.

    These ultra-light models don't click until you hold one, but when you do, you look at the standard ultra-lights and wonder how people use them.

    -Charlie

  13. Re:Warm heart by swordboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow Transmeta will always have a warm place in my heart.

    And Intel will always have a warm place in my lap.

    Seriously, though.... The new IBM X40 is only 2.7 lbs with approximately the same battery life. The Transmeta only looks good until one realizes that it has a tiny 10" monitor.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  14. Re:Just Because of Linus Torvalds by Cooper_007 · · Score: 5, Informative
    Um. No.

    Intel Pentium M Thermal Design Power is listed as 24.5 Watt at 1.7 GHz, a FAR cry from the 7 Watt you claim

    The 900 MHz and 1GHz ones are the 7 Watt models, but how those perform compared to an Efficeon I was unable to find.

    Cooper
    --
    I don't need a pass to pass this pass!
    - Groo The Wanderer -

  15. Re:How will Linux do on this, I wonder.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is an option to optimize for the Transmeta processor line in the kernel configuration. That option is passed along to GCC to make sure the kernel will run as fast as possible. So GCC supports the Transmeta system.

    There are also things like LongRun support, etc. that are in the kernel configuration, that don't necessarily involve GCC options.