Slashdot Mirror


Sharp Debuts New Transmeta-based Laptop

kpogoda writes "Transmeta's new Efficeon processor will debut today within a new trim and slim Sharp notebook. In case you don't remember, the processor family is known for its extremely low power consumption and blazingly high computing speeds."

80 of 250 comments (clear)

  1. Blazingly high? by cbreaker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I thought these chips were supposed to have "good" performance while consuming a lot less power.

    --
    - It's not the Macs I hate. It's Digg users. -
    1. Re:Blazingly high? by lbolla · · Score: 5, Informative

      "The notebook's standard battery will last three hours under normal conditions. An extended battery will add six more hours of computing time and 0.6 pounds, Hanly says." It doesn't seem very different from a common laptop... batteries' life is still a big problem.

      --
      Computer are useless: they can only give you answers. - Pablo Picasso
    2. Re:Blazingly high? by lintux · · Score: 5, Informative

      That's the Crusoe chip. These machines have a new chip, the Efficeon. Quoting from the article:

      "The new Efficeon TM8600 is designed to improve performance while maintaining the low power consumption required by ultraportable notebooks--such as the 2-pound MM20. Sharp's tests showed that Efficeon delivers about 1.4 times the performance of Crusoe, Hanly says."

      I don't know if 1.4 times the Crusoe should be considered fast, but at least it's faster...

    3. Re:Blazingly high? by binaryDigit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Hanly says." It doesn't seem very different from a common laptop... batteries' life is still a big problem.

      Well sorta, the big buy here is that you get that much life from a significantly smaller/lighter battery. Note the presence of the physically larger "extended life" battery. Battery life isn't the "problem", or more accurately the tradeoff, it's the size (which in this case does matter).

    4. Re:Blazingly high? by millahtime · · Score: 5, Informative

      "It doesn't seem very different from a common laptop... batteries' life is still a big problem."

      If you look at the weight of the laptop 2 pounds for the 3 hours and 2.6 pounds of 6 additional hours. That is lighter than a conventional laptop. Hell, my battery prolly weighhs 2 punds for 3 and a half hours. So this does use less power. The battery is just smaller.

    5. Re:Blazingly high? by akintayo · · Score: 5, Informative

      No 1.4 times Crusoe is not fast, since the Crusoe was/is kinda slow. Anyway the comment implied that the line was fast, but as stated in the linked article the Crusoe was panned for its performance.

      --
      Woe be on to them, all who rise against poor people, shall perish in a the end. Buju Banton
    6. Re:Blazingly high? by ThisIsFred · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, battery life is the problem too. These laptop batteries lose much of their capacity within a year if used on a daily basis. They're outrageously expensive. When are fuel cells coming?

      --
      Fred

      "A fool and his freedom are soon parted"
      -RMS
    7. Re:Blazingly high? by addaon · · Score: 3, Informative

      Fuel cells also lose most of there capacity within a year (okay, within a month) if used on a daily basis. I'll stick with batteries for long life; the only advantage fuel cells have is energy density.

      --

      I've had this sig for three days.
  2. Not that fast by linux_warp · · Score: 5, Informative

    While I love their products, the slashdot title of "blazingly high" clock speeds is a little misleading.

    From the article: "A base configuration of the notebook includes the 1-GHz Efficeon processor, 512MB of memory, a 20GB hard drive, and a 10.4-inch display for an estimated starting price of $1499. Sharp will take preorders for the notebook as of Monday, and it will ship in April."

    So we are looking at around 1ghz.

    1. Re:Not that fast by random_rabbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

      There's no reference to blazingly high clock speeds, just computing speeds. Remember clock speed!=compute speed.

    2. Re:Not that fast by auzy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Thats not strictly true.. On a speed/watt basis, efficeons are by far the best. It also depends on what ur doing.. The VLIW architecture auto optimises, so some things will run very well on efficeons (and they get faster as they run).. Also, unlike the intel and AMD mobile processors, efficeons aren't just some hacked up processor designed for something else.. The 3 hours of computing on even the centrino's isn't great when u consider that the transmeta's last about 12 hours, and chances are u wont use ur laptop to play doom3 either

      He is right though.. the efficeons are fast.. not as fast as the pentium-m's or mobile AMD's, but a very decent speed, gets faster as it runs and awesome battery life make transmeta processors a very good choice..

      Could be wrong, but transmeta's I think dont need fans, so they are also very silent.

      People should remember that the future of computers is clustered CPU's (like openmosix) and wireless, to share CPU power, so in that point of time u wont need much CPU (cause u will just leech it off other computers on the wireless network if u need it) and when that happens, the only reason why the CPU will matter is for when u aren't connected to a network... still, 1GHZ, or more processing power is definately sufficient (my laptop only has 850 P3, which I'm surviving off easily, even with gentoo). Its no athlon 64 FX, but honestly, if u need that kind of power just buy a workstation...

    3. Re:Not that fast by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Maybe poster realized that full quote is 'The MM10 used Transmeta's older Crusoe processor, which was praised for its miserly power consumption but panned for its performance.' and the article is about MM20 with Efficeon processor.

  3. Obligatory Dilbert/PC World Quote by goldspider · · Score: 4, Insightful
    "Will you advertise on my website or is your new product you want me to review a piece of junk?"

    Seriously, though, this practice shouldn't be rewarded with more free publicity for these products or their "reviews".

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  4. How will Linux do on this, I wonder.. by polemistes · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since Linus Torvalds used to work for Transmeta, I would like to know if Linux is well optimized for this processor.

    1. Re:How will Linux do on this, I wonder.. by distributed · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I think the question should rather be...

      Whether linux is well optimized for x86 arch.

      since these chips use a VLIW core for the actual processing with the x86 instructions being compiled on the fly to the vliw code.

      Maybe if the linux kernel was compiled to take better advantage of instruction level parallelism the code morphing engine(the x86 to vliw compiler) could actually run linux much faster.

      But then that would be doing some part of the code morphing engines job at the compiler level... nothing wrong with that except you would have to write an entirely new compiler.

      plz correct me if i am wrong. (any comp arch gurus around)

      --
      [all generalizations are untrue except this one]
    2. Re:How will Linux do on this, I wonder.. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 5, Informative

      There is an option to optimize for the Transmeta processor line in the kernel configuration. That option is passed along to GCC to make sure the kernel will run as fast as possible. So GCC supports the Transmeta system.

      There are also things like LongRun support, etc. that are in the kernel configuration, that don't necessarily involve GCC options.

  5. This seems like a good idea... by Tore+S+B · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...a laptop with a dedicated "portable" architecture. I can definately see Intel saying "More transistors, more power, more clock, and it'll be okay" - which is questionable on the desktop but not at all adequate with laptops. Transmeta's departure from this is an interesting turn of events - Will we see two separate processor lines, one for the laptop, and one for the desktop? And I don't mean the M-series, which just added variable clock and PM, but something like two different design philosophies.

    And damn, that's a sexy laptop... :)

    --
    toresbe
    1. Re:This seems like a good idea... by Tore+S+B · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Huh?

      Did you even read my post?

      "And I don't mean the M-series, which just added variable clock and PM, but something like two different design philosophies."

      Compare to your link.

      "These components include the Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor, " - that isn't really buried deep down into the site.

      Centrino is a power-efficient chipset, true, (and, BTW, kudos Intel for releasing OSS drivers!) but as I said, it's still basically a power-reduced Pentium X. What I was asking for, was something like a separate architechture, designed for power economy.

      --
      toresbe
    2. Re:This seems like a good idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      But variable clock and power management has been around in Intel's chips since the mobile Pentium III's and 4's.

      The Pentium M is a very low voltage chip that manages to achieve relatively high clock speeds (difficult to do with low voltage). And since it's a modified Pentium III, it can outperform the mobile Pentium 4 counterparts handily.

      So, while you may be right that the Pentium M is not a complete redesign, it does have significant technology to make it low power. Sometimes that best bet to a successful product is to modify existing proven technology, not start from scratch. I think Intel has done a commendable job in this regard.

    3. Re:This seems like a good idea... by centron · · Score: 4, Informative

      You should mean the M series, because there is a lot more to it than PM and variable clock, something the regular Pentium line has had for years. Read this article and you'll realize just how much went into it.

      --

      XeoMage

  6. Zaurus connectivity ? by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I first expected it to be some kind of super Zaurus but no...
    it just seems to be some bigger Vaio C1xx.
    Now, I do not see who they want to sell this to if this at least present no consistency with the rest of their offer.

    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  7. Celeron comparison by PingKing · · Score: 5, Interesting

    How does this chip compare with that other energy-saving chip, the Celeron?

    And more importantly, is there any reason you'd choose a Transmeta-powered rig over an Intel one?

    --

    Patriotism - the last resort of scoundrels.
    1. Re:Celeron comparison by PingKing · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Whoops, I mean the Centrino chip.

      --

      Patriotism - the last resort of scoundrels.
    2. Re:Celeron comparison by tugfoigel · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Why not choose a Transmeta powered port-a-box? What's the difference what's inside as long as you can run you necessary proggies? Does it really matter if AMD or Intel is inside? Does it really matter that it's Transmeta? How could you even tell, provided your software behaves as expected?

    3. Re:Celeron comparison by slackr · · Score: 5, Informative

      Centrino is not a chip. It is a "system" comprised of three parts:
      Intel(R) Pentium M processor
      Intel(R) 855 Chipset Family
      Intel(R) PRO/Wireless Network Connection
      Basically, Intel repackaged and "branded" some existing technologies in an effort to squeeze out other wireless hardware manufacturers (if it ain't Intel WiFi, you can't call it "Centrino," and a successful branding campign makes people want Centrino whether or not they know what it actually is).

      Anyway, your question is stil valid, but to technically nitpick it's really about the Pentium M processor.

      More info:
      http://intel.com/products/mobiletechnology/ demo/wo rks.htm?iid=ipp_demworks+tab&

      --

      * Please do not read my signature.
    4. Re:Celeron comparison by rsborg · · Score: 3, Informative
      How does this chip compare with that other energy-saving chip, the [corrected]Centrino/Pentium-M?

      Well, from my viewpoint, it's a power/speed tradeoff. Here's my take from the list of laptops you might want:

      • Efficeon/Transmeta is the lowest power laptop chip you can buy. It scales very well, but is also not very fast (but is 1Ghz fast enough for laptop activities like browsing/doc editing/movies?)
      • Next is the G4 from Apple, which is also low power. My sister's iBookG4 is not exactly a slouch, but then again, it doesn't run windows (is that a pro or a con)?
      • In the middle is the Pentium-M, which is fairly low power, as well as being pretty dang fast. Con: high cost.
      • higher up on the power curve is AMD's AthlonXP... not much to say 'xept it's probably the cheapest x86 option out there.
      • Drawing more power is AMD's Athlon64-Mobile. Thing is, the power control on this puppy is so good that it's often cooler than the XP-M. It is by far the fastest mobile chip out there.
      • On the high end you have the Pentium4-M (which is what I have). Only use this if you never plan to test the term laptop. P4's run hot and were never meant to be put into a mobile architecture.
        • I'd say what you want depends on what you need. Cost not being a factor, I'd be happy with a Centrino/Pentium-M. If I wanted super low power/heat, I'd go with a Efficeon. If I wanted OSX (yummy), I'd of course, go with an ibook (still wating for those powerbook G5's). If I want cheap, AMD has me covered with their XP-M offerings. If I wanted a powerhouse/gaming 'top, I'd definitely go for an A-64M (just impressive). What I'd avoid: the P4M (abomination).

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
    5. Re:Celeron comparison by sean23007 · · Score: 3, Informative

      On the slower, colder end you're forgetting the VIA C3 chip that is available in a few laptops and tablets. It uses less watts than the Efficeon and gives off less heat. It is also cheaper. However, it is considerably slower per clock cycle and doesn't have the power management built into it like the Transmeta chips. I have a Crusoe tablet, and I'd like to compare it directly to a VIA-based machine.

      On the fast and hot end you're forgetting about laptops with the full P4 in them (or even the new ones with P4EE or Prescott). I also have one of these (full P4). It is hotter than hell, and I can't keep it on my lap for more than half an hour without worrying that the sweat on my thighs will short it out. Also 12 lbs vs 3 lbs is not so comfortable.

      Basically, there are a lot of options depending on what you want. I personally like the laptop form factor for a desktop machine (quiter than a normal rig with comparable speed), and the tablet/laptop hybrid is awesome for portability (especially the Compaq one, which has the computer behind the screen instead of the keyboard, so there is nothing to produce heat where the machine touches your body).

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
  8. Not what it is all about by Alain+Williams · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The CPU is just one component that eats electricity in a laptop; the other big hog is the back lit screen.

    Do you really need much compute power in a walk-about machine to do email, web browsing, word smithing ? In a trade off give me battery time over machine horsepower every time.

    I think that many people have a laptop for ease of use (all your files not backed up in one place that moves with you) and expect the laptop to do everything. What I like is those laptops that drop performance in battery mode.

    1. Re:Not what it is all about by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Ditto, I'd also like to add that I use our home 'pokey' laptop to ssh and remote desktop into much faster/less portable computers. Think of it as a wireless console and it's CPU horsepower doesn't matter AT ALL.

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    2. Re:Not what it is all about by hankwang · · Score: 3
      Do you really need much compute power in a walk-about machine to do email, web browsing, word smithing ? In a trade off give me battery time over machine horsepower every time.

      Common sense would say so, but unfortunately, newer browsers, widget libraries, and window managers use a lot of resources. I used to use Redhat 7.1 with FVWM and Opera 6. Blazingly fast on my P3/450. Then, because of frustration with incompatible libraries for newer RPMs, I upgraded to Fedora/Opera 7. I still run Fvwm, but this new Opera version (with a newer Qt library, I presume) needs about 2 seconds of CPU time just for getting in and out of focus. If I look carefully, I can see that the borders of the windows inside the Opera window change a little bit depending on the focus. Emacs and xterm still run fine, but everything that has Gtk or Qt is slow as hell.

    3. Re:Not what it is all about by Alain+Williams · · Score: 3, Interesting

      1. If I look carefully, I can see that the borders of the windows inside the Opera window change a little bit depending on the focus. Emacs and xterm still run fine, but everything that has Gtk or Qt is slow as hell.


      I have long been of the opinion that the Gnome/KDE developers should be forced to use a P450 as their desktop - that would result in fast/efficient/bloat_less code, or at least we would see a fast mode option where most of the eye candy is switched off.

    4. Re:Not what it is all about by Glonoinha · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I do almost the same : I have a 4 year old HP Jornada 680 (6" diag 640x240 touch screen, 133MHz cpu, 16M RAM, keyboard, wifi card) running WinCE 3.0 - I use the term-server client for WinCE to connect to my server and just run a terminal server session full speed on one of those machines. The only thing moving over the wifi connection is screen deltas and it is incredibly smooth, fast. If the screen was 640x480 or even 800x600 - it would be the perfect solution.

      Battery lasts about 20 hours (I have the larger battery) and it is instant on / instant off. Doesn't run DOOM III but for regular computing it is almost perfect.

      Maybe if Sharp wanted a 'killer' solution, come out with something like that, a PDA with a keyboard, wifi, term-server client already installed, a 1024x768 screen, a real slow CPU that sucks lightly on the electricity, and a fat battery to run for 20 hours. The entire thing could weigh less than 2 lbs and would simply scream when connected to a decent machine running terminal server.

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
    5. Re:Not what it is all about by JimDabell · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have long been of the opinion that the Gnome/KDE developers should be forced to use a P450 as their desktop - that would result in fast/efficient/bloat_less code, or at least we would see a fast mode option where most of the eye candy is switched off.

      The very first thing that you see when logging into a KDE system for the first time is a personalisation wizard that asks you a couple of questions about how you'd like things to work.

      One of the things it asks you is how much eye candy you want. There is a slider that goes from "fewer effects" to "more effects".

      Furthermore, KDE has been getting faster and faster since KDE 2. When KDE 3.2 was release, a lot of people mentioned how fast it felt compared with the previous version.

  9. US debut by mocm · · Score: 4, Informative

    The new Muramasa has been out in Japan since January. It has had some nice reviews and keeps up well with Pentium-M modells of similar clock speed (see this Japanese review). And it is much cheaper.

    --
    ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
  10. Slow Computers by CastrTroy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I don't know what everybody is complaining about with these being slow chips. THey should really start to look at the trade-offs. Do they want to lug around an 8 pound laptop, with 3 hourse of battery life, just so they can say they have a 2.4 GHz laptop, or would they rather carry around a 2.6 pound laptop with 6 hours of battery life (weight with extended battery), and have to run things just a tinsy bit slower. I've found that provided the system have a good amount of memory, a pentium 2 is good enough to run most applications.

    --

    Anthropic principle: We see the universe the way it is because if it were different we would not be here to see it.
    1. Re:Slow Computers by Westley · · Score: 2, Informative

      That really depends on what you're going to use your laptop for.

      My laptop is my development and entertainment computer. I want it to be able to cope with XP and Visual Studio .NET (or Eclipse) pretty nippily, and still play music while it's doing so without stuttering. I want it to be able to compress music to MP3 without making it completely unusable while it's doing so.

      My current laptop (Dell Inspiron 5150) does all of that fine. It has a reasonable battery life (3 hours or so if I'm not playing games), a reasonable graphics card (GeForce FX 5200 - not great, but not too bad) and 1Gb of memory to make up for the disk being slow. Its processor is nice and nippy at 3.06GHz, and having used a P3/733 for a long time, it *does* make a difference.

      In terms of portability, most of the time I'm only carrying the laptop to/from the car, so it's not a problem. Lugging it around in the house is no hassle at all. It's heavy, but it's not like I'm running a marathon with it.

      Basically, I'd rather go for heavy and powerful than light and slow - because of what I use my laptop for. Not everyone will want to use it in the same way as me, of course, but I'm pointing out that not everyone has the same priorities as you, either.

    2. Re:Slow Computers by digitalhermit · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I've found that provided the system have a good amount of memory, a pentium 2 is good enough to run most applications.

      I've been tweaking an older PII laptop (400MhZ, 192M) over the past few months. The idea was not to lose any functionality or "new" features (i.e., dropping a 2.2 based distro, the PII's contemporary OS, would be cheating). So far I'm extremely pleased. The machine is very functional, even faster in some respects than a newer Thinkpad T22 (800MhZ, 256M) because the video support is better.

      The main changes:
      * 2.6 kernel -- huge difference
      * Fluxbox instead of KDE/Gnome
      * NPTL
      * Rebuilt some apps with i686 optimizations
      * Config tweaks (default services, buffer sizes, etc)
      * Application substitutions (Firefox vs Mozilla, etc)

      I've been testing other things including:
      * Default fs (reiserfs vs ext3)
      * sshd default configs (blowfish vs des, etc)
      * MP3 vs OGG (about the same CPU, but I hear MP3 is nicer)
      * Adjusting timer resolution in kernel
      * Replacement syslog that batches writes

  11. Factually opposite, IIRC by c4miles · · Score: 3, Informative

    Your post contains some errors, I believe.

    IIRC, the Pentium-4 die was stripped of extraneous chip functions in order to maximise the clock speed. These more efficient parts of the chip were re-introduced in Pentium 4M, to enable the system to run more efficiently at lower clock speeds. Perhaps the actual transistors themselves are on both chips, but only enabled in one format or the other.

  12. Don't forget heat... by Lord+Haha · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm surprised no one has mentioned this, Transmeta's tend to run alot cooler then Intel/Amd...

    I know personally after sitting in a class at university with my Dell my legs feel like they are about to melt. Anyways Transmeta has exact stats on the site but its somewhere around 1/4 of the heat output, personally thats why I am considering a Transmeta next round....

    1. Re:Don't forget heat... by ArseneLupin · · Score: 4, Funny
      I know personally after sitting in a class at university with my Dell my legs feel like they are about to melt.

      Be glad that it was only your legs ...

  13. Speed is by no means by karmaflux · · Score: 4, Informative

    what these processors are known for. Benchmarks show that. That's not to say it's a bad processor, and maybe the Efficeon will turn out a little sweeter. Meanwhile, there isn't a whole lot about Transmeta's stuff that stands out. Except the wacky design.

    --

    REM Old programmers don't die. They just GOSUB without RETURN.

    1. Re:Speed is by no means by mocm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The benchmark is of a TM5600 Crusoe against a VIA. I can tell you that the TM5800 933 MHz is faster than the Via at 1GHz and the Efficeon is even faster than that.
      Maybe Transmeta used to be a little slower, but not anymore. The Efficeon can keep up with the Pentium M
      and the new 90nm Efficeons will be even faster with higher clock speeds.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
  14. Re:Warm heart by TwistedGreen · · Score: 3, Funny

    *cough*Linus Torvalds*cough*

  15. 9 hours by Teun · · Score: 2, Informative

    2.6 pounds with 3+6= 9 hours of battery life.

    --
    "The likes of Facebook and WhatsApp are free to those whose privacy is of zero value."
  16. People don't get how thin these are by Groo+Wanderer · · Score: 5, Informative

    At CES, they had one, and it was absolutely dwarfed by my Nokia 6360 phone. Take a look:
    http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=13578
    While the phone is a 'big' one the laptop was thinner, and it weighed nothing. Very cool.

    These ultra-light models don't click until you hold one, but when you do, you look at the standard ultra-lights and wonder how people use them.

    -Charlie

    1. Re:People don't get how thin these are by Glonoinha · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Jesus the top one in that article got my attention ... that's real, real nice.

      http://www.oqo.com/hardware/specs/

      --
      Glonoinha the MebiByte Slayer
  17. Just Because of Linus Torvalds by myownkidney · · Score: 2, Insightful
    I think transmeta is loved by geek community just because of Linus Torvalds connection.

    Their first chip Crusoe, although saving power, underperformed badly. And the Efficeon doesn't look fast compared to its rivals. The Efficeon TM 8000 can do 1.1GHz consuming 7W. Intel's Pentium M does 1.7GHz for the same power consumption.

    I don't think there's anything particularly cool about this news. It is the same as the discovery of the new planet. There are better ones already out there.

    1. Re:Just Because of Linus Torvalds by mocm · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I very much doubt your Pentium M numbers. Why else would e.g. Samsung need to permanently activate the cooling fan on its Pentium M notebooks when running without battery, whereas the Efficeon doesn't even need a fan.
      And saying just because the TM5600 (oldest Crusoe) was slow the Efficeon is also slow, is like saying just because the K-6 was slow the Athlon64 is also slow.

      --
      ***Quis custodiet ipsos custodes***
    2. Re:Just Because of Linus Torvalds by Cooper_007 · · Score: 5, Informative
      Um. No.

      Intel Pentium M Thermal Design Power is listed as 24.5 Watt at 1.7 GHz, a FAR cry from the 7 Watt you claim

      The 900 MHz and 1GHz ones are the 7 Watt models, but how those perform compared to an Efficeon I was unable to find.

      Cooper
      --
      I don't need a pass to pass this pass!
      - Groo The Wanderer -

  18. Did You by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Compile the "Dell Laptop Extensions" into the kernel? gkrellm has an i8k plugin you can use to spin the fans up to low and high when you hit certain temperature thresholds. There's also a standalone temperature monitoring utility but it's seemed a bit flakey lately.

    Of course both fans spinning will impact your battery performance but it's better than third degree burns on your... lap.

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  19. Cool by color+of+static · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have been looking at the MM10 (the older version) as a small Linux computer for some months now and the memory was always a hold up. This things solves that and then some.
    The older model was small and light, but very usable. You could confortably hold it in one hand for a long time and it never got warm/hot. This was the thinnest thing I've ever seen, and the smallest without seeming to sacrifice on usability (close to sacrifice though).
    I might just have get one and see about running Linux on this little guy.

  20. Wrong price point by uradu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    As far as I'm concerned (and lots of people I know as well), the magic price point for notebooks financed from personal funds has become $1000 or less. After all, these are machines that are often "refreshed" every two years or less, I definitely don't want to spend much more than $500/year on notebooks. This Sharp is only giving me a slow processor, XGA and 20GB for $1500? Heck, I can get the ultra-slim Averatec 3150 for $900 (often for $700 refurbished), and it's got twice the HD and a faster mobile AMD to boot. Given that the backlight eats most of the power anyway, I doubt this Sharp will run all that much longer on a charge than the Averatec, Transmeta or no Transmeta.

    1. Re:Wrong price point by Draknor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Uh, RTFA?



      The MM20 is designed as a second notebook for corporate executives or frequent business travelers that prefer something lightweight when traveling, Hanly says.



      You are right - its the wrong price point for home use. The mass market there buys Dell, HP/Compaq, and maybe Sony. They have the cheap laptops at the price point you speak of. I'm actually in the market for a laptop, and I've decided to skip the cheap consumer junk and go with an IBM T40/41 - a durable business-class notebook backed by a 3 year warranty with a company known for great customer service. And I should be able to get it around the $1500 price point within a few months.

  21. Re:Warm heart by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Somehow Transmeta will always have a warm place in my heart. Don't know why, but I really like the company and praise them for what they are trying to do.

    Really, why is this even slightly +5 Interesting? Fair enough that you love the company...they did employ Linus for a while after all, and this is Slashdot, so I guess that counts for something. But Transmeta is nothing more than a hyped up dot.com remnant that hasn't realised that it should have crawled away and died somewhere a few years ago. Transmeta overpromised and underdelivered. Its CPUs have never really carved out a niche, suffering from terrible performance, and negligible gains in power efficiency over mobile designs from Motorola, Intel and AMD. Too underpowered for a mainstream notebook, and too power hungry for a PDA or cellphone, Transmeta CPUs linger on in a kind of zombie state, appearing from time to time in strange Japanese systems like this Sharp Actius, itself nothing more than a pale imitation of an Apple 12" G4 PowerBook.

    You're entitled to your opinion. It's just -1, Clueless Linus Fanboy, not +5, Interesting.

    Thank you.

  22. Re:Warm heart by swordboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Somehow Transmeta will always have a warm place in my heart.

    And Intel will always have a warm place in my lap.

    Seriously, though.... The new IBM X40 is only 2.7 lbs with approximately the same battery life. The Transmeta only looks good until one realizes that it has a tiny 10" monitor.

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  23. Needs work. by Short+Circuit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Using a wireless network as the backbone for a cluster seems to me to be inefficient, at least right now.

    Sure, you've got a lot of power available, but your latency is going to be pretty bad. And your reliability, especially in buildings with a lot of concrete. I don't know how well OpenMOSIX handles faults.

    On another note, what happens to a wireless network when you put a whole bunch of computers in the same room? Which will be more important? The number of channels, or the bandwidth per channel?

    Again, I don't know how OpenMOSIX would react.

    Of course, it is an interesting idea, even if it needs work. Perhaps incorporating mesh network logic with signal strength sensing would improve the behavior of the system.

  24. Comparisons with macs? by littleghoti · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone know / care to comment how these chips compare with apples G3 and G4 laptops? I was under the impression that they were much less power hungry than intel and AMD's chips, which let them be lighter and have better battery life.

    1. Re:Comparisons with macs? by kf6auf · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Contrary to the other replier, I have a 15" G4 Powerbook (TiBook) and I still get a little over 4 hours on the battery if I turn down my screen a little bit (still very readable). I would also like to mention that my powerbook is over a year old now and it got more than 4.5 hours when it was new.
      As for the newer powerbooks, I can't say how they compare, but its probably pretty close to 4.5 hours if that is what Apple claims. The 17" powerbook has a bigger battery and so it should last about the same as the 15" while the 12" lasts longer at over 5 hours (my friend's would last about 5.5 hours).

      As for the G3 laptops.....those are old stuff man. Apple stopped selling them so I can't even check on the specs for you.

      As far as the heat issues go, I can heat up my lap if I (simultaneously):
      1. Tell Mathematica to sum a series from 1 to 100 with many factorials and an infinte sum inside.
      2. Burn a DVD.
      3. Read slashdot over a wireless connection in addition to being on IM, other standard things, etc.
      But I still won't get anything near the 2nd degree burns you get with my dad's P4 2.4 GHz Toshiba.

      In other words, I love my powerbook. =)

      -Scott

  25. Either way... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I have a feeling the guy writing the summary was blazingly high.

  26. Transmeta hype by mst76 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Transmeta made a lot of fuss about energy efficiency, but in reality, the Intel LV and ULV mobile Tualatin P3 consumes almost as little power while being much faster. The best power/speed tradeoff seems to be the ULV P3 933mhz, 512kb L2 cache, 1.1V. The typical and maximum power consumption are 4 and 7W respectively.

    Intel is now hyping the P-M just as heavily as Transmeta. The P-M can dynamically scale the frequency through a large range, but if you use CPU intensive apps, the power consumption can get suprisingly high (31W for the 1.5-1.7 ghz versions). For more facts and figures, see Sandpile.

  27. Sharp can't compete with Fujitsu's P-Series. by NullStream · · Score: 2, Informative

    Fujitsu 'did it right' with the P-Series.
    It would be nice to have a faster processor but the flexibility the P-Series (I have the 2120) is unmatched. 8 hours+ battery life and when you add in a 7200rpm drive it is not as sluggish.

    Games are best avoided here but I didn't buy it for mobile gaming just mobile working and notes taking in class.

    --
    "Survival of the fittest Max, and we've got the fucking gun!" - Pi
    1. Re:Sharp can't compete with Fujitsu's P-Series. by andrewm · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I agree, as I own a P2120B and a NetWinder 3300, but even Fujitsu switched the P Series to Intel processors.

      I helped develop a Crusoe based product, the NetWinder 3xxx series. It took a LOT of effort to before we saw 86 on the debug port (86 is the code for when the Crusoe processor is finally executing CMS and is ready to execute x86 instructions). It was so monumental a moment and effort that we took pictures.

      A NetWinder 3300 powers my website. Along with the DSL modem, the UPS lasts over 2 hours with the 30 Watt peak power draw (15 Watts each).

  28. The bytecode changes with each processor... by emil · · Score: 3, Informative

    Transmeta makes wholesale changes to the backend architecture of these chips with each release. The x86 frontend is the only thing that they guarantee to remain stable.

    A compiler producing native Transmeta code would need to emit (wildly) different code for each different revision. I read a quote from Linus somewhere that the scheduling and parallelism issues are very, very messy.

    So that is why you don't see native Transmeta compilers, although I have heard of large customers tweaking the translation software for higher FPU performance.

  29. Not fast at all. by ItsIllak · · Score: 3, Insightful
    In case you don't remember, the processor family is known for its extremely low power consumption and blazingly high computing speeds

    Obviously someone who's not used the Transmeta based Compaq Tablet. About as blazingly fast as a shackled tortoise. It does have great power consumption stats though :)

  30. Does it still 'dynamically emulate' by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    And if so, can i change the emulation to lets say.. a PPC, or even a Z80?

    Or is that locked down to a microcode level and not 'user accessable'.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  31. Re:Warm heart by TheApocalypse · · Score: 2, Funny

    Transmeta CPUs linger on in a kind of zombie state
    I can just see the advertisment department going crazy with this. "When there's no more room in Hell, Transmeta will crawl the earth."
    Just doesn't sound as good if it's not a Dead film.

  32. Don't use KDE do you? by bluGill · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've used kde since the 1.0 days, upgrading all along on my dual ppro-200. Even in the slowest 2.0 days, it ran fast enough on my system. Sure I turned the eye-candy slider way down when I configured KDE the first time, but that is all. It works, and is fast enough.

    The only time I have problems is when I hear the harddrive grinding away, swapping. Even then I'm running something heavy duty in addition to KDE, something that can take up most of my memory alone.

  33. Re:How about compiling natively for the Efficieon? by jensend · · Score: 3, Informative

    The native instruction set isn't well-suited to host an operating system (see also Linus's take, it's too much of a moving target (TM changes it all the time and keeps the frontends stable; without this flexibility they would be entirely lost), and compiling for the native instruction set would eliminate all the benefits of code morphing (the dynamic optimizations, etc). Efficeon has a lot of potential; here's hoping Transmeta can get bugs sorted out and become competitive.

  34. Crusoe performance, battery life (Fujitsu P1120) by mahler3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I have a Fujitsu P1120, with the 800MHz TM5800 Crusoe. It won't blind anyone with its speed, but I make up for a lot of that because the touch screen makes navigating easier than the eraser-mouse or other laptops' touchpads. (That cinched the choice of the 1120 over the Sharp MM10.)

    I've heard that Crusoe processors tend to do well on relatively compact computing tasks, like CPU-heavy numerical analysis in which a relatively small bit of code is run repeatedly-- a bit that's small enough to fit into the instruction translation cache. One interesting thing that I've noticed is that, compared to most applications, OpenOffice seems to run quite nicely on my P1120. Perhaps that's because the JVM (or its most frequently used subset) is small enough to stay in the translation cache? I'm just guessing, here... more informed insight is welcome.

    The extended battery really does last almost 9 hours if you're not using WiFi-- e.g., on a flight. I still had 48% battery remaining after constant use on a 5-hour Orlando-to-LA flight last summer. My WiFi use is mostly at home, and it's still decent-- though I haven't tried to measure it. (Interestingly enough, the biggest battery hog seems to be the tiny DLink USB Bluetooth adapter that I use to sync my cell phone!)

    On the other hand, I effectively lose some of my performance on airplanes, due to everyone around me saying, "What the heck is that thing? Aww, how cute..." Then they realize that their Dell laptop's extended battery is almost as big as my whole rig. :-)

    FWIW, my P1120 doesn't appear to have a fan or a vent. And I can actually place it on my lap for a while; it gets warm, but not too hot.

    Obligatory Linux content: I haven't tried loading Linux on it yet, because as far as I can tell, there is no available touch screen calibration utility. (The screen itself reportedly shows up as a generic USB pointing device.) Anyone know of a solution for this?

  35. wait..... by MoFoQ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    lemme check the calendar to make sure it aint april 1st.

    Indeed, transmetas have an extremely low power-consumption rate, but one can't say they are fast, especially post-Enron; u can't fudge the numbers. If power consumption was a part of the performance index (let's say for a SpecInt or a SpecFP), then yea...it might be able to compete. But it's like Via's C3; its low power in more than one way.

    Just like you can't have a Lamborgini that gets 60MPG, you ccan't expect to have low power with high power; only some balance of the two in between.

  36. Re:Soekris-like board? by Bombcar · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go to this Mini-Itx site and scroll down to the review of "Teeny Weeny PCs"

    Hope this helps!

  37. I have a MM10 by Anonymouse+Cownerd · · Score: 3, Informative

    I have the older MM10 model, with the transmeta 1GHz. I love the machine though it is not the quickest. The only problem? They seem to be OVERLY dedicate. I had purchased my original last July. After 3 weeks of minimal usage, the screen went bad. Sharp sent me a refurbished unit (though I had paid full price for a new unit just 3 weeks early). About a month ago, the replacement went bad (battery was bad and possibly the charge circuitry went bad as well). They have since sent me a refurbished unit and battery and I've been ok since then. It's a great machine, but you really have watch out for it.

    --
    http://www.rayn.net . Funny. Stuff.
  38. Other form factors? by -tji · · Score: 2, Interesting

    When will transmeta come out with a Mini-ITX or Nano-ITX board with ther CPU on it? VIA has done very well at that with its C3 processors. They sell a lot to end-users, and sell a ton to embedded systems vendors. Transmeta could get a piece of that market.

    Those server/embedded devices are a lot less demanding of CPU power. Any device, like a laptop, which has direct user GUI interfacing will always need a lot of horsepower.

  39. Blazingly high? by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 2, Informative

    Is it really all that much faster than the Crusoe? I've got a Sony Vaio C1MW with an 866 MHz Crusoe in it and it's just barely fast enough as it is.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  40. you started off good... MOD PARENT DOWN! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I mostly agree with your sentiment until you say the Sharp Actius is a "plae imiation of the ... PowerBook."

    Ok, you obviously don't own a laptop or know what the fuck you're talking about. The Actius weighs 2 pounds and has one internal spindle (hard drive) with a travel weight not much more (very small, light power adapter). The PowerBook weighs ~5 pounds and has two internal spindles. It's travel weight is more than that still. If there's no difference betwee 2 and 5 pounds... I just don't have anything else to say to that. You're clearly clueless on the issues and are merely plagarising the popular opinion.

  41. wrong! by dJOEK · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's known for that Torvalds kid that worked there

    --
    Exercise caution when modding this message up: the author acts like a jerk when his karma is excellent.
  42. Re:Not that fast -- Transmeta Fans by Nom+du+Keyboard · · Score: 3, Funny
    Could be wrong, but transmeta's I think dont need fans, so they are also very silent.

    Tansmeta's do have their fans. But rather than being little devices that go round and round inside the case, these fans keep the air circulating by incessantly praising the processor in their new notebook to anyone who will listen.

    And they're not silent at all!

    --
    "It's the height of ridiculousness to say for those 9 lines you get hundreds of millions."
  43. Transmeta CPUs != longer run time by rayd75 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I know it is one of their big selling points but I have yet to have used a Transmeta device that actually had a longer run time than my huge Latitude C series with second battery. Why? Because for some reason manufacturers seem to have a fetish for the 2.5 - 3 hour benchmark. Once they reach it, they concentrate on size instead. Surely I can't be the only one who would be happy with a smallish (12-13") notebook with long battery life. I certainly find that more interesting than devices that are so tiny as to be unusable yet have comparable run time to normal laptops.

  44. There IS a definite market for this. by rindeee · · Score: 2, Informative

    First off, I just finished ordering one, with the extended battery. Now for why:

    I use a Laptop virtually all day, every day. I currently work on a Thinkpad T23 with a 1.3GHz processor, 1GB RAM, 14" Screen, etc. I add a 802.11g card when in office and a T-Mobile wireless WAN card everywhere else. I love my laptop, but I have three complaints: 1. Weight, 2. Heat (holy crap it gets hot), and 3. battery life. I also have a Sony Picturebook which address these issues, but it's TOO small and lacks a LOT of connectivity. I use a Zaurus with Opie and love it. I have long wished that I could get a "really big Zaurus" with integrated WiFi, good storage, etc. That's essentially how I view the MM20. Of course that is predicated on my getting Linux on it, but I am confident that given some time, that is quite doable. A 1GHz proc, half a gig of RAM, acts as a USB2 hard-drive when connected to my desktop, integrated 802.11g, 2 lbs. and a 10" screen...it's PERFECT for my needs. Anyone want to buy a Thinkpad?

  45. Re:My Crusoe is *anything* but "blazingly" fast... by trouser · · Score: 2, Informative

    RTFA

    The MM10 used Transmeta's older Crusoe processor, which was praised for its miserly power consumption but panned for its performance..............Sharp's tests showed that Efficeon delivers about 1.4 times the performance of Crusoe

    --
    Now wash your hands.