Guinness's World's Smallest Hard Drive Record
ketbra writes "CNN reports that Toshiba has received the Guinness World record for the smallest disk drive for their new 0.85-inch HDD. (Covered on Slashdot a while back) The technology editor from Guiness made the comment that "Toshiba's innovation means that I could soon hold more information in my watch than I could on my desktop computer just a few years ago". "
Imagine what they are getting themselves into. Will companies now apply for largest screen? Fastest start-up time? Fastest processor? Quietest fan? Largest spam mailing?
At last, a hard drive thats also a suppository. Just what we need after a few too many rounds of Guinness.
"Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
You look at the picture and say "Damn, that's a big quarter."
The bigger the inside, the smaller the outside. I've already lost 2 hard drives this way... When will they stop?? Is it too much to ask for something at least one cubic foot?
Is it strange to think that hard drive is cute ?
Not sure why, but it just seems adorable in a little puppy dog kind of way.
I find Guiness World Records for computer parts strange. Everyone knows that all parts are in a constant upgrade cycle. 0.85 today, 0.80 tomorrow.
I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.
My computer about a decade ago had a 500 meg HD, now I've got a pocket USB drive with about the same capacity.
To set the record for how many you can eat in a minute using a cocktail stick?
And if you thought that was boring you obviously havn't read my Journal ;-)
Was anyone else supremely disappointed to see the word 'Guinness' (possibly mispelled) and find that the article was not about beer, with this being the day before St. Patty's day and all?
(Offtopic +1, Beer)
Check out the best P2P sharing website: MEDIACHEST.COM
RAID array of these things. I'm being serious, really.
Just think in a normal 3.5inch drive case you could probably fit at least 30 of these drives (lets say 1.5inch x 1 inch for each drive with two 3x5 layers, should leave plenty of room for electronics). Given the tiny size of each drive the seek times are probably phenominal) and even if each one wasn't all that fast or even reliable they could be combined to make an incrediably fast drive (using RAID5 or similar internally) with amazing seek times. BUT it might cost an arm and a leg, unless mass manufacturing could bring prices WAY down.
Thoughts on tech, Software Engineering, and stuff
Smaller disks generally mean smaller margins of reliability, whether that's because of missing safeties or just smaller margins for error.
I bought an MP3 player a while ago (iRiver iGP-100), which has a "reduced" HD. That worked well for a while, but recently I've lost everything from the 300MB mark and up.
I don't know why this happened, and frankly I don't care; I'm just happy that I have a three-year warranty, and they're letting me upgrade to a newer model which uses a larger, and thus safer, HD. For free. (Apparenly they didn't have replacement drives in stock; the law is the law, though.)
Well, enough about me. Now, about these drives: Would you trust your data to one of them?
"Wow, 1 bit!"
Being about the size of a quarter, wouldn't it be 2 bits?
It's one thing to have a book of records that's based on bar bets, and things that just involve getting a bunch of semi-skilled people together to do.
Does anyone care about corporate achievements in the Guiness record books? (other than the corporations, that is).
If they want in to the book, get 1139 people with golf carts, and break the record for longest golf cart parade.
I just think about the Guiness book being about things that are done almost solely for getting into the book, with no significant redeeming qualities other than getting someone's name in print. You know -- longest toenails. Worst smelling shoes -- the types of things that the average person could pull off with a bit of dedication, and not needing a multi-million dollar research facility, and not being directly linked to a company's product development.
How about 'shortest MTBF' for the next hard drive record?
Build it, and they will come^Hplain.
The first hard drive I ever bought was only 5 megabytes (no, not gigabytes). That's way smaller than the one in the article.
Consider two geeks in a pub (yeah, it's a stretch, usually one pint and they're under the table babbling about some OS or Kirk&Spok or making Monty Python references before passing out, ..):
A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
Am I the only one irritated when improvements get called innovations?
Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
I mean, seriously. People used to have to really work hard at breaking records before. And Guinness occasionally had to work hard to find them. Now, it's just a natural, virtually unstoppable progression for all "records" related to technology. Truly lame. The technology secion of Guinness has become a newspaper, effectively.
Get rid of the tech companies and bring back the human freaks! Guinness has closed many really cool (and difficult) categories like "Eating a Bicycle".
I'm going to fill up the world's tiniest drive with really really small thumbnail sized pr0n!
e.
Build Your Own PVR/HTPC news, reviews, &
Being about the size of a quarter, wouldn't it be 2 bits?
Which is what you need to encode all possibilites of getting a shave and/or haircut, coincidentally enough.
The enemies of Democracy are