Slashdot Mirror


New Nano-ITX Boards Shown At Cebit

Subartik writes "The new nano-itx boards from Via have been shown at the CeBit show in Germany. It looks like it will be a suitable platform for all kinds of small form factor devices. See VIA embedded and Linux Devices for the specs and pictures" An anonymous reader points to PC World articles about the Nano-ITX board itself as well as the first system which will include it.

228 comments

  1. Linkage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Troll

    Looks like the first system to be built with this chip will be precisely twice as long as the chip itself!

    MODS: If you don't get it, don't mod it down.

    1. Re:Linkage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't get it?

    2. Re:Linkage by Momo_CCCP · · Score: 1

      and most probably fourth as expensive (for price varies as the square of the surface, as far as chips are concerned).

    3. Re:Linkage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Someone explain this to me, thanks.

    4. Re:Linkage by Krunch · · Score: 1

      It seems the first system using it will have a CD-ROM drive. Now look at the first link.

      --
      No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  2. Ironic Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I load up the PC World article on nano-tech and what ad do I see? That's right, an ad for ENIACS on the cheap.

    1. Re:Ironic Advertising by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You still see ads? How retro. Friend, it's time to get your adblock on.

    2. Re:Ironic Advertising by Mr.+Troll · · Score: 1

      You use a seperate ad blocker? How retro. Just use Mozilla, and block images from the ad server...

      --
      Kiss my shiny metal ass
    3. Re:Ironic Advertising by juhaz · · Score: 1

      It's a Mozilla extension in case you didn't notice.

      Retro? Well, let me know when moz can block _ANYTHING_ (yeah, that includes flash), and based on a pattern of some kind as well, not just server.

    4. Re:Ironic Advertising by Stonent1 · · Score: 1

      Block images from Mozilla? How retro. I block ads by directory name. Using the Adblock plugin for Moz. */banners/* */ads/* http://ads.* . I can even right click on embedded frames and colapse them never to see them again.

    5. Re:Ironic Advertising by UniverseIsADoughnut · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You do realize that many people find the dead space left from the ad more anoying then the ad itself. Ad blockers are for people who are really crazed, for most it's just pop ups that bother them. Normal ads are fine, aside from the ocasional super flashy one. And sometimes you might find them useful. Also I prefer to still have ads make websites money. I don't want to have to start paying to visit every website out there because everyone has ad blockers so sites need new money streams.

    6. Re:Ironic Advertising by amix · · Score: 1
      I use Privoxy which is much more powerful than the Mozilla extension.
      • Adds HTTP headers.
      • Editing the settings for this option, or turning it on if it was off, is not yet supported using this web-based editor.
      • Block the request
      • Prevent the website from setting cookies on your system.
      • Prevent the website from reading cookies from your system.
      • Replace animated GIFs with their (first/last) frame.
      • Use the first frame last frame
      • Change HTTP/1.1 requests to HTTP/1.0. Only change if you know what you're doing!
      • Bypass some click-tracking URLs.
      • Filter the website through regular expression filters. You can use the radio buttons on this line to disable all filters applied by previous rules, and/or you can enable or disable the filters individually below.
        • Get rid of particularly annoying JavaScript abuse
        • Get rid of particularly annoying HTML abuse
        • Kill cookies that come in the HTML or JS content
        • Squish WebBugs (1x1 invisible GIFs used for user tracking)
        • Kill all popups in JS and HTML
        • Give frames a border and make them resizable
        • Kill automatic refresh tags (for dial-on-demand setups)
        • Reorder attributes in tags to make the banners-by-* filters more effective
        • Kill banners by size
        • Kill banners by their links to known clicktrackers
        • Text replacements for subversive browsing
        • Remove Nimda (virus) code
        • Kill embedded Shockwave Flash objects
        • Make Quicktime movies saveable
        • Kill all JS event bindings (Radically destructive! Only for extra nasty sites)
        • Crude parental filtering (demo only)
      • Request is for an image (only useful in conjunction with the block and set-image-blocker actions).
      • Block any existing X-Forwarded-for header, and do not add a new one.
      • Stop old web browsers from sending the user's e-mail address with every request.
      • Remove completely
      • Fake e-mail address:
      • Helps prevent tracking by not sending the URL of the previous web page.
      • Remove completely (breaks images on some free web hosts).
      • Fake as the root directory of the site (fools checks for in-site links.)
      • Fake as this web address:
      • Pretend to be using a different web browser. (Breaks many web sites).
      • User Agent string to send:
      • Filter the website through a built-in filter to disable many JavaScript pop-up windows.
      • Specify which ports are allowed for SSL (HTTP CONNECT) access. Note that this allows arbitrary tunnelling, so opening all ports would be a security hole.
      • Legal SSL ports (comma separated, ranges allowed):
      • Disables compression. Compressed web pages are faster to download, but cannot be filtered with filter or kill-popups. This setting only affects the few web sites which support compression.
      • Adds a special wafer (standard cookie) to all your requests.
      • Adds user-specified cookies.
      • Any cookies set by the website are changed to temporary ("per-session") ones, which only last until you close your web browser. This will allow you to use sites that require cookies, but sites will not be able to track you across sessions. For this to be useful, you should disable crunch-outgoing-cookies and crunch-incoming-cookies.
      • Specifies how to block image

        I do not understand people who use their clients' integrated spam-filter or popup/advert-blocker, while there is specialized utilities (as Privoxy) which just do that way better

        Now mod me down, since I am off-topic, so no-one can see this and learn from it.

      --
      Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
    7. Re:Ironic Advertising by juhaz · · Score: 1

      Oh, I've used Privoxy before. But the fact is, 99.9% of the time adblock does just as well, is a lot faster and lot better integrated into the browser. Filtering is the only thing it really does that other solutions don't...

      If I end up on a one-in-thousand page that has ads that are non-blockable without filters, chances are that I'll never end up there again anyway. Why on Earth should I bother wasting hours writing a regexp that is, after all, only useful for that one site I'll never visit again? Complex filters eat a shitload of CPU time on big pages as well.

      Filtering web proxy may have some uses, but simple adblocking sure as hell isn't one of them, it's like trying to kill a fly with cannon.

      I do not understand people who try to kill flies with cannons.

    8. Re:Ironic Advertising by MikeFM · · Score: 1

      Without ads we might *gasp* have to resort to using more targeted, smaller, non-commercial websites. Amazing as that sounds it is possible. I'd say that 90% or more of what I look at online is on such sites. Google being the main exception. I might be willing to pay to use Google. Thus far I've yet to find any other website worth paying to use. Discussion forums and news articles just aren't worth paying for because any dope can set up a discussion forum and two any dope can write articles. Yes, such sites may be less polished but without the competition of the big sites I think they'd become more polished.

      --
      At what price learning? At what cost wisdom? The price is a man's peace of mind, and the cost is his life.
    9. Re:Ironic Advertising by Anonymous+Slacker · · Score: 1

      Block ads/annoying sites from Mozilla? How anti-retro. I use a customized hosts file to redirect any queries for sites I don't like to 127.0.0.0 and that gets rid of most of the annoying ads.
      And the good thing about it? It works for any web browser that I want! I'm quite happy using IE under Windows ME to do this. Much shorter learning curve than any *nix OS or alternate web browser. If you can edit a text file, you can do this.
      I know there's many other security risks to using Winblah blah blah, I know all the slander about M$, I just don't care. I'm lazy about such things. When I feel like dinking around with things I have no clue about and less than no time to learn properly, I boot into my FreeBSD partition. When I just feel like surfing the web, I'm gonna use what came with the OS that makes all the toys on my computer work the way I want them to.

      --
      "If you choose not to decide, you still have made a choice!" -Rush
    10. Re:Ironic Advertising by ryanvanderzanden · · Score: 1

      how many is 'many people'? I would much rather see a blank white area than some flickering/flashing animated banner/skyscraper ad.

      Lastly, I use the Mozilla addon adblock (adblock.mozdev.org) and you can set it to compact the whitespace where the ad used to be. Crazed or not, I surf w/o popups OR banner ads, and it is nothing aside from glorious. :)

    11. Re:Ironic Advertising by amix · · Score: 1
      Why on Earth should I bother wasting hours writing a regexp that is, after all, only useful for that one site I'll never visit again?

      You don't. Privoxy does that for you. The regexp you'll need are already added by default. If the overlap or leave out with your habits, all you need to do is to add a category of exception in you user-config, using the form privoxy delivers. A few clicks in radios...

      Complex filters eat a shitload of CPU time on big pages as well.

      Wrong. They don't. I use a VIA C3 system atm, which really is not that powerful. Web browsing with the proxy on does not use more CPU load than any other task.

      I do not understand people who try to kill flies with cannons.

      Well, it's simple. We are an army. Four clients hooked to the server. One dual-boot WinXP/Linux, one AmigaOS and two Linux systems. See, I do not carry my browsers in the hand. I have them installed on the clients. On WinXP sometimes I use IE, mostly however Firebird. On Linux I use mostly Mozilla-stable and Konqueror. On AmigaOS I use IBrowse and AWeb.

      Some do have the ad-block, some don't. And even if all were Mozilla, I'd still need to transfer the settings, keeping in sync.

      I tend to control all centralized. Be it email, spam-control, ad-block, contacts, bookmarks etc. It's the power of utilization.

      I don't understand, how people are happy with monolithic applications, that take over functionalities for themselfes, instead of using a modular approach in the good old *IX tradition, where you have a programmatic instance for mostly all, doing only that task, but this excellent and then pipe the data through the world.

      --
      Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
  3. Perfect size for a media center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    hmmmm??

    1. Re:Perfect size for a media center? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      There is a perfect prebuilt system for a media centre as well.

  4. my dream by wed128 · · Score: 4, Funny

    i can finally realise my dream of cramming a computer onto my bike!

  5. I can see it now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Man, all this biking has made me hot... AND BOTHERED! Time to crank up the ole computer..."

    *switches on generator*

    *begins pedalling very, very slowly*

    "Ugh... all strength... in pedalling... motion. Not... enough... for hands... and wrists..."

  6. Pictures by JPriest · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mini-ITX has some pictures here

    --
    Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    1. Re:Pictures by ManxStef · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, I love this one. It seems to defy the universal law that toast always lands butter-side down, and cats always land on their feet. Or maybe they're inferring that it's a pussy magnet? Either way, I want one ;)

      (apologies to MiniITX for the impending bandwidth onslaught)
    2. Re:Pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      They are the same people that built a computer inside a Windows XP box a while back.

    3. Re:Pictures by devnullkac · · Score: 1

      Apparently it's perfect for mounting on cats.

      --
      What do you mean they cut the power? How can they cut the power, man? They're animals!
  7. My head hurts, again. by gklinger · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Let me get this straight. We've got ATX, Extended ATX, FlexATX, WATX, Mini ATX, microATX and now Nano-ITX? How is anyone suppose to keep this straight? What a pain in the atx. I will say this, these boards are getting pretty small. The article gave the dimensions as 3.7 inches by 5.9 inches by 6.3 inches. Nanode must have invented a debigulator.

    1. Re:My head hurts, again. by Rinikusu · · Score: 3, Funny

      All - ATX
      Evil - Extended
      Fucking - Flex
      Women - WATX
      Make - Mini
      Men - Micro
      Nuts - Nano

      --
      If you were me, you'd be good lookin'. - six string samurai
    2. Re:My head hurts, again. by gooberguy · · Score: 3, Informative

      Nano-ITX is 12cm x 12cm. Oh, and you forgot to list Mini-ITX. :)

      --


      Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    3. Re:My head hurts, again. by mrjackson2000 · · Score: 1

      you forgot BTX and the various sizes there too

    4. Re:My head hurts, again. by Jeff+DeMaagd · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There was a quote to the effect of:

      Standards are great! You can pick any one you want!

      The prospect of smaller computers with an interchangeable form factor is interesting. I doubt power users will want an ITX board based system as their main system, but there's a lot of power to be harnessed for experiments.

  8. Embedded by oO+Peeping+Tom+Oo · · Score: 5, Funny

    Wow! This'll open the door for much more efficient/interoperable embedded computers! Just think about it: A more advanced Big Mouth Billy Bass!

    1. Re:Embedded by WaterTroll · · Score: 1

      Please allow me to retrieve my wooden baseball bat.

  9. MOD DOWN: I DON'T GET IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    MODS: If you don't get it, don't mod it down.

  10. notice the AES hardware encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Somebody needs to write a Linux driver for that shit! That would be so badass. The Eden chip is sweet and all (low power usage, low heat emission -- so no CPU fan) but it's not nearly as computationally capable as Intel or AMD's latest and greatest. But I bet if the Linux loopback encrypted filesystem had a driver for that chip, it would fly in comparison to even the fastest PIII!

    1. Re:notice the AES hardware encryption... by dont_think_twice · · Score: 1

      Somebody needs to write a Linux driver for that shit! That would be so badass.

      no diggity

    2. Re:notice the AES hardware encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      the chip has a standard x86 instruction set as far as i can tell... all the mini-itx boards load up linux fine anyway

    3. Re:notice the AES hardware encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go back and read VIA's webpage (linked in the /. story) about the PadLock encryption thingy. That's not normal x86 instruction set!

    4. Re:notice the AES hardware encryption... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that shit ... badass ... sweet and all

      Hey nigger, are you a homosexual? I know of an organization looking for members. Search Slashdot for "GNAA".

    5. Re:notice the AES hardware encryption... by tkw954 · · Score: 1
      It appears that some sort of linux driver just became available and that "PadLock ACE encrypts at rates of up to 12.5 Gigabits per second (Gbps) with a 1GHz VIA C3 processor, more than eight times faster than the best software AES implementation from a power hungry 3GHz Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 processor based system that encrypts at a rate of a mere 1.5 Gbps."

      However, I haven't tried the program and I have no idea just what it actually does, as it is only avaiable for Windows and Redhat 9.0. I imagine that the source will be "available" to "approved" developers.

      Watch the viaarena.com forums.

  11. More news and pictures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Check out www.mini-itx.com for more info on this and a soon-to-be-released Nanode design.
    Oh, in anticipation of the inevitable Beowulf post, scroll down the mini-itx page a bit...
    Well, mini-itx based rather than nano-itx, but still.

  12. The Nanode System by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    at Mini-itx,
    Nanode

  13. Re:useless to me by stecoop · · Score: 1

    Yeah - reminds me of the late past away EMachines (now Gateway) that soldered the CPU to the board.

    When the boards get smaller along with PCI cards that are half-height then I'll show more interest.

  14. IPv6 by Zathras26 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A few people earlier today were wondering why anyone would need IPv6, since IPv4 "obviously has enough address space". Developments like this should pretty clearly demonstrate that that's not the case. It probably won't be too terribly long before even your fridge will need an IP so you can program your refrigerator to know when it needs to order more groceries and the like. And that's just practical applications; toy and game manufacturers are going to go nuts with this.

    1. Re:IPv6 by DAldredge · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You know, it's not that hard to buy the food yourself...

    2. Re:IPv6 by Zathras26 · · Score: 1

      You know, it's not that hard to buy the food yourself...

      No, it isn't, but having your fridge order it and then deliver it will save a lot of time and hassle, so it's going to happen eventually. We've already got home grocery delivery in some areas -- you order your groceries thru the grocery store's web site, then have them deliver it. This is for people like me who find it either too time-consuming or too much of a hassle (or both) to go to the grocery store.

    3. Re:IPv6 by Migrant+Programmer · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Please explain to me why my fridge needs a publicly addressable IP.

    4. Re:IPv6 by Zathras26 · · Score: 1

      Maybe it wouldn't... I suppose household appliances could do their thing with private address space. But I was just trying to make a point, that IP-enabled devices are going to become ever more-widespread, which was one of the implications of this new form-factor. Most of the new gadgets and toys that have it will require IPs for one reason or another, and at least some of them won't be able to do their thing with private addresses (e.g., cell phones).

    5. Re:IPv6 by JPriest · · Score: 1

      In case my grandmother needs technical help with it and I don't want to walk her through it over the phone?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    6. Re:IPv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your HOUSE would have an IP and a NAT and behind that is all your appliances.

      Thats more realistic.

    7. Re:IPv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You want your fridge in a publicly routed address space, behind no SNATing device? Kill yourself, please.

    8. Re:IPv6 by Zathras26 · · Score: 2, Funny

      For some reason, I didn't think of NATting until after I posted that. Must not have had enough coffee. I think suicide would be a slight overreaction to such an oversight, however. ;-)

    9. Re:IPv6 by threephaseboy · · Score: 1

      Just because it isn't in the public address space doesnt mean that it would be accessable. Using NAT where everyone has the same "private" address range is just plain evil. With real firewalls and not the dumb "router/firewall" you get for $20 at frys, everyone could have a "public" unique address for every device in the house, and still be protected against hackers etc in the same way you are now with NAT.

      --
      .
    10. Re:IPv6 by twelveinchbrain · · Score: 1

      Because it would be an absolute pain to have to manage all of the port forwarding configuration if your future home had 1,000 networked devices installed in it. The future networked home will involved networked light bulbs, networked light switches, networked faucets, networked windows, networked power outlets, the whole works.

      You may want to contract with a company to manage all of these devices for you, rather than manage them all yourself. So, for instance, they would mail you just-in-time lightbulb replacements.

      Or, perhaps you want to be able to query the status of your products from outside your home. Forgot what model of DVD player is in the bedroom? Want to see if your baby's asleep? Query them from outside.

      As another poster said, none of this public addressability implies that the devices are insecure. Security and addressability are NOT mutually exclusive.

      --
      Not Found
      The requested URL /signature.html was not found on this server.
    11. Re:IPv6 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because your wristwatch is only smart enough to point directly to a peer?

  15. Re:useless to me by markclong · · Score: 5, Informative

    It does seem to have a mini-pci slot on the bottom according to this. This could make for one cool car computer for DVDs, mp3s, and GPS navigation. Low power consumption, low heat dissapation, and good performance for audio and DVDs.

  16. The Pineapple system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As this picture shows it would be good for Suse users

  17. Heat? by hermeshome.se · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anyone know how they plan to cool the CPU? Passive or active cooling? I am not an expert on VIAs CPUs at all. Hopefully they wont be as bad as AMDs first 1GHz...

    And are there any cases ready to deliver, that support this new "standard"?

    1. Re:Heat? by hermeshome.se · · Score: 4, Informative

      I'm sorry, RTFA!

      "None of these processors require a cooling fan, which means that the PC can be substantially quieter than other computers based on processors requiring cooling fans."

      Bah.

    2. Re:Heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it uses a heatsink, just like the other Eden chips on the current mini-itx boards...

    3. Re:Heat? by Illissius · · Score: 2, Informative

      Passive, that's the entire point. Their 1GHz CPU consumes 7W. (Yes. Seven. Which happens to be the same as Transmeta's Efficeon.) By comparison, Intel's current ~3GHz P4s consume around 70-80W, and their new (Prescott core) P4s over 100W.

      --
      Work is punishment for failing to procrastinate effectively.
    4. Re:Heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      and the 533 MHz Eden chip only use about 2 Watts... too bad they don't make laptops with this chip (at least i don't think they do)

    5. Re:Heat? by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 2, Informative

      The thing consumes 2.5Watts. For comparison, a 3.2GHz P4 consumes approximately 100W, a current Itanium-2 approximately 150W, and a Pentium-M "centrino" 1.4Ghz chip: 28W. So, to answer your question, hell, you could attach a single flattened penny to this thing and it would keep it from overheating :)

      --
      ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    6. Re:Heat? by JPriest · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And a 1GHz via C3 is also comparable to a 400 MHz celeron.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    7. Re:Heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not entirely true..

      The low end mini-itx boards are fanless @ 500-600MHz.
      The faster 1GHz boards have heat sinks with fans, which are not particularly quiet. So, this will be a nice improvement on those.

      Hopefully they will make mini-itx boards with these CPU's. They even had prototype boards with two of these tiny CPU's, that would be cool.

    8. Re:Heat? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The VIA chips are slower, but not nearly as much as you think. I have two boxes that I use daily, and don't notice that much difference between them. Unless celerons are faster than durons, but I'm skeptical about that...

      BTW, here's the /proc/cpuinfo for both chips. The AMD is only 50% faster in bogomips, which sounds about right to me.

      533 MHz VIA Eden chip:

      vendor_id CentaurHauls
      model name VIA Samuel 2
      cpu MHz 533.365
      cache size 64 KB
      flags fpu de tsc msr cx8 mtrr pge mmx 3dnow
      bogomips 1064.96

      AMD Duron:

      vendor_id AuthenticAMD
      model name AMD Duron(tm) Processor
      cpu MHz 797.183
      cache size 64 KB
      flags fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 mmx fxsr syscall mmxext 3dnowext 3dnow
      bogomips 1592.52

    9. Re:Heat? by smallfries · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not really. The 1Ghz nehemiah next to me has no problems decoding divx movies that a P3-500 can't handle. I'm not sure exactly, but I think its about the same as a P3-800.

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
    10. Re:Heat? by puetzk · · Score: 1

      there's at least one - the lindows mobile PC (which is really an eNote OEM rebadged). Dunno i there are any others. This is based on the VIA eden chips, though I don't recall whether it is the ezra-t core or the newer antuar/nehemiah core. http://info.lindows.com/mobilepc/mobilepc.htm http://www.sub300.com/port.htm

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
    11. Re:Heat? by 10Ghz · · Score: 1

      Older Via-CPU's were REALLY slow. They had half-speed FPU's for example. Current 1GHz CPU's are considerably better. They have SSE-support and full-speed FPU's. No, they are not speed-monsters when compared to Intel or AMD (even when comparing clock-for-clock), but they are "fast enough", while running really cool. And the built-in encryption-engine is REALLY fast (fater than hi-end P4 for example).

      --
      Lesbian Nazi Hookers Abducted by UFOs and Forced Into Weight Loss Programs - -all next week on Town Talk.
    12. Re:Heat? by erl · · Score: 1

      Is that the CPU or the entire MoBo that consumes 2.5W?

      It would be really cool if it were possible to build a somewhat big, but still portable device to 'prototype' things like MP3 players, etc.

      I wounder what kind of power solutions you could do and how many hours of runtime you could get. Even if it is a 'backpack' computer.

      Ok, so it would be similar to a laptop, but more customizable probably in terms of power configuration etc.

    13. Re:Heat? by smallfries · · Score: 1

      Errr ;^) That was my point. The article is about the Nehemiah processor, the only difference for the new form factor is that there is a new package for the chip. I was arguing that they are "fast enough".

      --
      Slashdot: where don knuth is an idiot because he cant grasp the awesome power of php
  18. Pictures by molafson · · Score: 2, Informative

    Here's some pictures and specs from the Nano-ITX PC that Mini-ITX.com is selling.

  19. Unknown risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm taking a wait-and-see attitude to these Nano-ITX boards. I think the long-term health risks of using these are unknown. There are some scientists that think inhalation of these motherboards can cross the blood-brain barrier. Remember the Slot 1 fiasco and all those babies born with appendages? Let your buddies go with the bleeding edge and if they don't sprout a third eye or six finger after a few months, you can start implementing safely (and cheaper).

    1. Re:Unknown risks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just as long as there are no flipper babies.

  20. Perfect size for a... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Home PBX with Asterisk.
    Part of a smart home security system.

  21. Take it one step further; share what you filter by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    DSPAM is one of these statistical filters (like spamprobe and CRM114) that can perform virtually perfect filtering of spam/non-spam you receive.

    Now that you are free of spam yourself, may I suggest that you take it one step further and share your data with the anti-spam community; the WPBL project lets many users report the IPs sending them spam and non-spam in realtime using a couple simple scripts installed in procmail.

    Our central database then publishes a real-time list of spam sources (the IP blocklist). Unlike spamcop, WPBL is entirely based upon automatic decisions made by statistical filters, 24/7. The resulting blocklist is already used by many ISPs; and you can also use it to block spamming IPs at your own server.

  22. This isn't news. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We already read the same exact thing, but in different words and headline over a week ago. This new article brings nothing new to the table except for a slightly misleading headline.

    The's forum.**

    ** - Not that a 15 year old is less intelligent than anyone else, just young people tend to not have their heads glued on straight when it comes to business and law. Wisdom takes time to build.

    1. Re:This isn't news. by eclectro · · Score: 1


      Yes, but some of us are counting the days that we will be able to get our hands on one.

      Any little scrap of news is welcome.

      --
      Take the cheese to sickbay, the doctor should see it as soon as possible - B'Elanna Torres, "Learning Curve"
  23. John Doe lawsuits by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That seemed like an odd comment, certainly they are doing this with permission from the record companies, much as iTunes did.

  24. In Australia they also rise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Of course it depends which way your head is up, or down - sometimes they go sideways in both directions.

  25. Re:That's okay - Holy cow 40 Million lines of code by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give MS a frickin' break....MS said there is going to be something like 40 *million* lines of code...

    Just out of curiosity, I counted the lines of code (both c & assembler, all processors) of the 2.6.4 kernel. It is less than 5.5 million.

    40 million lines of code. There's all the reason I ever need to not use it.

    With 40 million lines of code, you never fix bugs, the best you can hope for is to relocate them to a really obscure place.

  26. Re:It's more than just the engine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had a problem with my '99 cavalier; the engine would drop it's RPMs by several hundred every once in a while; almost, but not quite, enough to stall.

    Took it in to the dealer, they said 'is the check engine light on?'

    'Nope,' I replied, 'but here's what it's doing...'

    'Sorry,' came the reply. 'If the check light's not on, there's no diagnostic codes for us to look up. We can't fix it unless we know what's wrong.'

  27. Re:Very cool, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Something to consider about Japan and their rise in technology, is that since the end of WWII, they haven't had a military to take up financing, (or resources, or R&D, etc..) thus leaving the government, and the culture as a whole, to focus on something else...like business and technology.

  28. Re:This is news??? Who the fuck cares! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Why is slashdot determined to report every single trivial detail when it comes to Microsoft?"

    They're trying to prove to the world that Microsoft is incompetent and evil. Those of us that use Windows must all be real morons who don't know shit, so they're hoping that by pointing out that Steve Ballmer double-parked we'll finally "see the light!" It wouldn't bother me except that it is generally assumed that my choice to use Windows 2000 wasn't voluntary. Slashbots think that Microsoft's monopoly put a Windows box on my desk at both home and at work. Yeah, there might be some truth to it. But seriously, if Windows was the big lump of shit that the people stuck in the past imagine it to be, I wouldn't be able to do 3D rendering on it.

    I agree with you that the petty "anything that can be spun against Microsoft" campaign is childish and obnoxious, but in this case, it was nice to find out why Hotmail was down. It's also nice to know when the next big worm breaks. Slashdot's helped me stay protected for years now.
    I just hope one day Slashdot will take Microsoft a little more seriously instead of the righetous BS that I need to be running GNAA/Linux even though my work software isn't running on it.

    *sigh* This post isn't going to be visible for very long. Pity. At least it felt good to let it out.

  29. A distributed shell ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... was mentioned a few months back in one of the magazines I pick up almost monthly (forget which one out of the several it was).

    I think the shell was called dsh. I believe this is the project site: http://dsh.sourceforge.net/

    Are the aims of this fault tolerant shell and dsh the same? I'm not a programmer, but I'm trying to teach myself *nix system administration.

    Eventually I'm hoping to cluster some older x86 systems I'm going to get at auction together for a Beowulf cluster. It sounds to me like one if not both of these two shells might come in handy!

  30. Re:Media player an essential part of the OS??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    IIRC, that's basically what the Commission said - right after RealNetworks demonstrated how to strip WMP from the OS. I'm amazed MS even bothered claiming it - I can only surmise that (a) they have non-geek lawyers or, (b) "we tried that lie with IE, and the dumb judge bought it, so let's try it again and see if we befuddle those dumb Euros".

  31. Does this sound familiar? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft (circa 2001): "With this new licensing model, you buy "software assurance" so if a new version is released in the next two years, you're entitled to a free upgrade"

    Uh huh...I see that's working out nicely...

  32. Re:useless to me by pla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    useless to me. No PCI, PCMCIA, or ISA slots? Seems like just a toy.

    With built-in IDE, USB, sound, ethernet, and video, what do you need a PCI slot for? And considering the trend micro-ATX boards took, you can expect to see dual or quad ethernet and SCSI support within a few months.

    Yes, I realize devices other than those three exist, but if you need them, you've probably missed the point of such a small board... Low power, passive cooling, quiet, small and portable... Loading it up with other toys (such as throwing in a high-end (and hot, and power-sucking) video card for gaming) kinda removes most of the advantages. If you want a "real" high-end desktop-class machine, you still need to get a standard ATX board.

    And if you really need some expansion capabilities, you always have USB - You can get just about anything in a USB form these days.

  33. Re:The real problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the best answer the 'If nobody would by this stuff...' argument was:

    Spam works on the level of 1 in 10,000. The general population contains a far higher rate of mental illness, senility, and retardation.

    You'll never cure spam by 'education' of any sort. There are some people who are just too crazy or too stupid to learn.

  34. Re:useless to me by quelrods · · Score: 0

    how is this a problem? Everything is integrated. It would make a great car computer!

    --
    :(){ :|:&};:
  35. Re:I wonder if this will catch what Mozilla misses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Thunderbird's latest builds have an improved spam filter using some ideas from SpamBayes, it's substantially improved from the older filter.

  36. Re:It's Okay, I guess by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Exactly.
    I am not a Nerd. I am a "digitician":)

  37. Legality of... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's the legality of An Anti-DoS Tool That Returns Fire? It sounds pretty vigilante to me, but what sort of laws would be applicable to it?

  38. Re:I guess that'll show em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    GNAA/Linux really has very few problems with userspace backward compatibility. What did you have in mind?

    Merely my brief experience with Gentoo, when they first upgraded glibc (from 2.2 to 2.3 iirc) and broke half the packages, then downgraded it again and broke everything else. This is really a pet peeve: aren't minor versions supposed to be compatible? And a zillion similar but smaller-scale annoyances, well expressed by Bill Paul many years ago and the years haven't eased the pain all that much.

    And BSDs are more likely to introduce binary incompatibilities

    Clearly you haven't used the BSDs. You may have library incompatibilities between major versions, but just install the earlier "compat libraries" and you're set. I upgraded from FreeBSD 4 to FreeBSD 5 -- a huge upgrade, over 2 years in the making -- and all my software just worked, even complex stuff like KDE and Mozilla that had been compiled under 4.x.

  39. Re:I know you need to be paid for your time, but.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    All down to the cost of labour and the costs of running a business, I'm afraid.

    I don't know what it's like in the US, but here in the UK, the cost of new PCs is making PC "repairs" uneconomic if the repairer wants to charge rates similar to those of plumbers and the like (to put some numbers on that, a typical rate for a plumber is 60GBP per hour, and a new PC costs from 300GBP, with monitor and preloaded copy of whatever the latest flavour of Windows is; how much work do you reckon can do in under 5 hours?)

    Of course, this does discount the stupid and the penny-wise-pound-foolish, whom are probably the best cash cows out there for any business.

    --

  40. Apple ./. IBM Microprocessor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ... Territo said. "It's like the difference between an Apple microprocessor and an IBM microprocessor."

    Hmmh, and I thought Apples G5 Microprocessors come from IBM...

  41. Re:useless to me by Krunch · · Score: 1

    What about a Soekris ? It has mini-PCI.

    --
    No GNU has been Hurd during the making of this comment.
  42. Where will the Boehemians sit? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Seems a little techie for the cool, grungy Boehemians, reading their Kerouac. Where will they go?

  43. Re:Pictures - stop the teasing by Prisoner+9 · · Score: 1

    Ah!!!!! Pictures. More pictures. I've been looking at pictures of these since NOVEMBER 2003. The puddle of drool on the floor is already deep enough to support a diverse ecosystem of fish. STOP TEASING US. When will these things be shipping so we can play?

  44. Re:IPv6 (Worse than you think) by G4from128k · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A few people earlier today were wondering why anyone would need IPv6, since IPv4 "obviously has enough address space". Developments like this should pretty clearly demonstrate that that's not the case. It probably won't be too terribly long before even your fridge will need an IP so you can program your refrigerator to know when it needs to order more groceries and the like.

    Absolutely. In fact, your fridge might demand an entire subnet. Smaller, cheaper boards drive appliance makers to a federated, modular architectures in which every new function has its own CPU. Your fridge might need range of IPs addys if it has an ice maker, RFID-reading intelli-chiller, home-message center, Kalory-Kounter terahertz sensor array, Phreshness Gas Sensor, Open-Door SMS alert sender, remote shopping list VPN website, etc.

    Its just much easier to make a bunch of modules that sit on a network than create a bloatware central system that has wires for every conceivable add-on function.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  45. imagine a beowulf cluster of those... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it would fill up all of soviet russia!

  46. Tons of uses... by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Here's some ideas:

    -Homebrew $200 firewalls (routers, gateways, etc) with much, much greater capabilities than those little D-Link units.
    -Personal NAS devices that, again, are mega-cheap and tiny
    -home automation devices: c'mon, who hasn't dreamed of fully automating their house?
    -motorcycle-based GPS system anyone?
    -cheapass public terminal systems: incorporate one of these into an LCD screen?
    -smaller tablets, laptops with longer battery life? Sure there's not much computational power, but if you're just doing surfing or doing office chores...
    -add a single wifi chip/small antenna and you have instant access point. I bet Starbucks would love this idea. Instant, easy, cheap wireless internet.

    Now, personally, I think these things could be great building blocks for doing distributed computing research. You could build a rather large network of these tiny things into a standard ATX tower, and have yourself a portable beowulf cluster, or hell, nice little units to experiment with distributed computing ideas. I can see it now: a couple of 8-drive HDD external bays, with each slot housing full systems!

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    1. Re:Tons of uses... by sir_cello · · Score: 1


      Most of your ideas are bad ideas: the Nano-ITX would be a fine firewall, but a complete overkill because the rest of its functionality would be unused. There are plenty of other devices that are better placed to be a nuts'n' bolts firewall. The great thing about the explosion of types of computing devices on the market is that you can choose just the right one for your needs: e.g. if you were building a grid computing cluster, you'd be wasting money using a nano-ITX, better to go for something even more bare bone and likely to be 1/10th the price.

      Where the Nano-ITX really would shine is as a multimedia device: i.e. next generation set-top box, media server, etc. You look at the specs and that's what they're aiming at.

      More than likely, the house is going to look like:

      - firewall+AP+etc device - CF based style DSL AP / etc, offering wifi + giga ethernet;
      - big grunt P3.* - desktop workstation, for multimedia, etc; have decent but not high storage, giga-ethernet connected;
      - personal SAN - multi-GB dedicated storage for the entire home network - personal files, movies, mp3's, etc: includes automatic backup mechanism (or, buy a remote network based backup ...), giga-ethernet connected, plus direct access wifi
      - a couple of tablet PC's - wifi, for sitting on the couch surfing the net, probably have no storage;
      - somehow wireless phone (wifi, dect or whatever) works into this setup for seamless VOIP;
      - maybe a few LCD screens, all wifi

      There are going to niches for all sorts of devices in the home.

    2. Re:Tons of uses... by kinema · · Score: 2, Interesting
      a portable beowulf cluster
      Take a look at PROTEUS. It's a 12 node massively parallel Mini-ITX cluster. It was built by Glen Gardner. According to Glen it has the processing power of between four and six 2.6GHz Pentium IV boards. The nodes run FreeBSD 4.6 and use MPICH 1.2.5.2 for message passing.
    3. Re:Tons of uses... by the_ed_dawg · · Score: 1

      Someone has already made a cluster out of mini-ITX machines. While it may not be the fastest cluster in the world, I bet my university would rather throw a bundle of these into a small closet, rather than dedicate a huge lab to a bunch of ATX cases... especially given our space problems.

      --
      There are two types of people: those prepared for the zombie apocalypse and those who will be eaten.
    4. Re:Tons of uses... by KidSock · · Score: 1

      Nonsense. What a waste of resources. Also, you clearly don't know what it really costs. What would you rather have - a 2.5 GHz Wintel Dell workstation ($399 deal right now) or one of these which will probably cost more when you get a case and memory and a disk....?

    5. Re:Tons of uses... by oasisbob · · Score: 1
      -Homebrew $200 firewalls (routers, gateways, etc) with much, much greater capabilities than those little D-Link units.
      I agree that there are tons of possibilites for the Nano-ITX boards, but I don't think a custom $200 firewall/router is one of them... They only have one ethernet port, and I don't see an easy way to add more. (Yes, USB is an option, but yuck. Is it really worth it?) I've never heard of a regular Ethernet mini-pci NIC before.

      Want a hackable router? Why not consider something more along the lines of the Linksys WRT54G. I've had mine for about a month and I love it. $80, runs Linux, and includes 802.11g.

    6. Re:Tons of uses... by SpacePunk · · Score: 1

      All that text just to say "Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!"

    7. Re:Tons of uses... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      FYI & FWIW Proteus is based on LONEWOULF which was put in service just about a year ago. Glen and Burt have had my plans since then and for some reason refuse to acknowledge that:

      http://sonic.net/~ax/woulf

    8. Re:Tons of uses... by dukerobillard · · Score: 1
      I can see it now: a couple of 8-drive HDD external bays, with each slot housing full systems!

      That's been possible for a while. Terrasoft Solutions, the people who port Redhat to the PPC, sell a computer that come in a 5.25" CD-ROM-style enclosure.

    9. Re:Tons of uses... by ldspartan · · Score: 1

      12 nodes? Massively parrelel? Thats not how I'd put that....

      Maybe... Parrelel at all?

      --
      lds

  47. Cost? by nurb432 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Didnt see it mentioned how much these things will be.

    If they are more then 100 bucks or so, they wont be too useful for the 'embedded market' they are trying to enter. ( plus they are still a tad too big and power hungry for that.. )

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Cost? by Doppler00 · · Score: 1

      Not necessarily. Embedded systems are typically running Pentiums or slower CPU's. Just looking at the size of this board, it looks almost the same size as a PC104 form factor. If via could develop to that spec there may be a market for a very high performance embedded system. Their processors could also be designed for much lower power specs if you aren't as concerned with performance (run at quarter speed or lower).

      Also, if you could purchase an embedded system for only $100 that would be a pretty good deal. Most embedded systems go for much more than a standard PC because they are not as much of a commodity.

    2. Re:Cost? by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

      Big? Power-hungry? 2.5 watts is certainly not power-hungry. And as for big, this thing's 6x6". It could fit in my cable modem.

      --
      ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
  48. Re:useless to me by Pike65 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As long as someone has the brains to slap two ethernet ports in it it'd make a handy firewall/router in a convenient itty bitty size. The box I have currently doing routing is an old IBM PC Server and it's so big I have to keep all my stuff away from it in case it undergoes gravitational collapse . . .

    --
    "If being a geek means being passionate about something, then I pity those who aren't geeks." - Pike65
  49. Portable Beowulf cluster? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Would you rather plow the same area (an full ATX box) with one strong ox (a fast CPU) or 1024 chickens (these units) pulling the load?

    1. Re:Portable Beowulf cluster? WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Depending on the nature of the problem, the 1024 chickens may prove to be a more viable solution. Not to mention, the added redundancy. You lose that ox and you're up shit creek. But thme chickens, there's plenty to go around, even if you eat one every week!
      Plus, with chickens, you get eggs for free...

  50. No DVI :( by another_henry · · Score: 1

    I love the form factor but when will motherboard manufacturers as a whole produce something with integrated video that supports DVI for flat-panel displays? Integrated video sucks for games of course but it's fine for office work, and that's exactly where the sharp text from an LCD screen is needed most. The DVI port supports analog screens too, so why isn't it being used?

    --
    "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    1. Re:No DVI :( by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

      LCD monitors can use VGA interface, as almost all have a VGA input or a converter cable. Compare this with CRT monitor, which usually lack a DVI-VGA converter, and you realise that you reach a bigger market with VGA than you do with DVI.

      --
      ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    2. Re:No DVI :( by sprprsnmn · · Score: 3, Informative

      It doesn't need DVI as it has 2 LVDS ports on the board itself.

    3. Re:No DVI :( by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Ah, but the quality is so much better with the digital connection. It's digital all the way rather than digital -> analog -> digital.

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    4. Re:No DVI :( by another_henry · · Score: 1

      Thanks for the heads-up :)

      --
      "Studies have shown that people who eat peanuts live longer than those who do not eat."
    5. Re:No DVI :( by Manic+Miner · · Score: 1

      I don't think this machine is aimed at the LCD screen market. All the via mico and nano boards have S-Video out on them. These kind of machines, especially the cool looking nanode, are designed to sit in your lounge and be connected up to the TV. Once they release a price, and assuming I can afford one, that will be my aim. Buy one, install linux, wire up to the TV and install one of the great linux media station packages.

      --
      If you ever drop your keys into a river of molten lava, let'em go, because, man, they're gone.
  51. Re:useless to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I have a couple soekrises. The miniPCI slot has wireless. The PCI slot one has NOTHING in the PCI.

    Oh, via USB (using a 4801 or a PCCARD in the 45x1 series) gives me digital audio out (thank you mr edirol)

    Why would I want a PCI slot that was designed for rather large desktops anyway? It seems like a toy.

    Were the nano-ITX to have a slot, perhaps somehting a tad more robust than PCI would be good. VME boards used to take quite a bit of industrial shaking. ISA would pop out at the least vibration.

    USB looks like a grand interface - I can read lots of IO, A/D and IR via a festival of USB and rs232 ports all attached via one USB plug.

  52. Re:useless to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not a replacement for an extra ethernet port, but one could always attach one of these

  53. Re:useless to me by Pottsynz · · Score: 1

    The main reason I'd want such a small board would be some sort of set-top box project involving MythTv or such like. Hence a pci slot is necessary for a tv tuner, well unless they start putting those on motherboards too (unlikely).

  54. More info by ispel · · Score: 1

    See here for a hi-res picture (warning, it is 600k ).

    In case you were wondering, it uses laptop-style SODIMM memory.

    1. Re:More info by Ironsides · · Score: 1

      Do my eyes decieve me or do I see a 3-Pin FAN connector (just below chip that reads:'SSC-10050') on the mother board. right next to wha apears to be an RCA jack.

      --
      Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    2. Re:More info by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      Funny thing is the CPU is one of the smaller chips on the board and I am quite sure it does the most :)... VIA needs to start scaling down the rest of their chips now :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
    3. Re:More info by puetzk · · Score: 1

      probably - many of the mini-itx cases are have a case exhaust fan, probably many of the nano-itx ones will too. So it makes sense to still provide one fan header even if the CPU doesn't need its own.

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
  55. Ok blah blah blah by MajorDick · · Score: 0

    I love when a new product is announced they get me all excited, I mean I would buy a couple of these tonight IF I COULD FIND A FRIGGIN PRICE ! People do generally like to know what something costs , unless youre buying a Bose Acoustic Wave radio, then youre better off not knowing what it costs.

  56. DVD Playback by colinramsay · · Score: 1

    I see it's got MPEG playback built in, but what's the real-world performance of these systems going to be? This is significantly smaller than anything that's gone before and it could be a pretty sweet device to sit under my TV... if it performs right.

    1. Re:DVD Playback by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

      Hardware MPEG2/4 == set top DVD playback. I would be very surprised if these things had trouble playing back DVDs.

      --
      ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
    2. Re:DVD Playback by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

      ...and should have no problem playing Divx.

      mmm, hardware mpeg4...

    3. Re:DVD Playback by puetzk · · Score: 1

      it's basically the same system (architecturally, obviously it's quite a bit smaller physically) as the existing epia-ME6000/M10000 (nehemia processor, unichrome video, etc), so you ought to be able to find plenty of reviews for performance comparison.

      --
      The Matrix is going down for reboot now! Stopping reality: OK. The system is halted.
    4. Re:DVD Playback by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

      Funny thing about DIVX is that since it has features like Qpel and psychedelic effects, hardware support for it's actually not that great

      --
      ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
  57. Too late! :) by timothy · · Score: 1

    If you want a computer on a bike, you need not wait for nano-ITX :)

    Try this google search for lots of cool stuff on Steve Roberts, ueber-nomad. He has shifted a lot of effort to boats now, but I prefer Behemoth :)

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
    1. Re:Too late! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      ueber-nomad

      He's a hobo?

  58. Re:useless to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ISA? C3s may not be high-end processors, but they deserve better than ISA. *laughs* ISA

  59. Linux support by IntergalacticWalrus · · Score: 1

    So how's the Linux support for these babies? Last time I checked, Via's mini-itx boards had quite flaky Linux support, ie. binary drivers for redhat 8.0 only and other stupid shit like that.

    I'm really interested in building a computer out of this, but if I can only use half of the builtin hardware due to shitty and/or non-existant Linux drivers, I'm not going to buy it.

    1. Re:Linux support by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Indeed. I'm wondering whether VIA is going to pull their finger out and actually offer some active support to the development of XFree86 drivers, for example. I've had VIA EPIA (Mini-ITX) systems for quite some time now, but it's only in the last month or so that native video chipset support has become available for them in XFree86. Presumably VIA funds the development of their own Windows drivers -- is it too much to ask that they aid in the development of X drivers just by releasing some programming specs? I like VIA's stuff a lot, but their all-too-common policy of "details on how to actually use this stuff are a closely guarded and valuable trade secret" ticks me off.

      --
      proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  60. distributed research platform: by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Design a custom 4U case, and mount these blade-style in the case, each with a tiny little 2 or 4GB flash drive. I'm willing to bet that a 4U half-depth case could support 12 of these things, with a low-power redundant PSU to power the array. Get a 72U rack, fill it with these things, and you have 216 systems on a single half-depth rack, consuming ~600 watts of power.

    Oh god, would I love to build such an array...oh baby...

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
  61. Re:useless to me by e+r+i+k+0 · · Score: 1

    I blew out my onboard video port once on a motherboard with no ISA, PCI, or AGP slots. Video cards aren't available as USB devices yet, IIRC. What would you do with a probably $100-$150 paperweight with just Ethernet/serial port connectivity?

    Don't mention diskless terminals - how am I supposed to play any good game (except NetHack) on an 80x25 screen?

  62. Do you really need Linux? by ^BR · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because if any free Unix (sue me SCO!) will do OpenBSD already supports that (since 3.4, and way faster support coming in 3.5).

  63. under $100 by nurb432 · · Score: 1

    Here is an example.. www.tecel.com

    PIC Boards are cheap too...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  64. Re:useless to me by cpjackso · · Score: 1

    It has a mini pci on the bottom. I'm wanting to use one as a movix box - it's perfect with it's SVideo out, probably digital audio and - **WHAT I MOST LIKE** - Serial ATA which I've got on my other PCs and works like a dream. None of the Mini-ITX's seem to have Serial ATA yet.

  65. Re:IPv6 (Worse than you think) by Zathras26 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Uh oh... now you've got me worried. What happens when a script kiddie hacks into my fridge and orders a million gallons of ice cream in my name? I suppose if it's a Microsoft Fridge (tm), it's going to need frequent patching. Or I could use an Apple Macintosh Fridge, which will be more secure but hold only a few kinds of food.

  66. Better link for first system by cmacb · · Score: 1

    I had trouble finding this from the supplied link, this one works much better:

    Nanode Computer

    I can see getting one of these. Finally a PC with the slickitude of the Apple iCube, and NO FAN!

  67. Re:useless to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
    With built-in IDE, USB, sound, ethernet, and video, what do you need a PCI slot for?


    Oh, come on, get real! PCI is only a small part of the problem. I need an ISA slot for my EGA card. And no MCA slots either! Where the fuck will my token ring card go without Microchannel???


    Next thing I'll hear is that it doesn't even have a way to attach it to my cassette drive.

  68. Re:useless to me by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    I have been planning a tiny box since I first saw the specs on the nano-itx, back in September.

    There is a proprietary mini-pci tuner card out, but it only works with another set top box.

    There are USB TV tuners. I have seen mixed reviews of them. Seems the ATI one is best, but some people have issues with them.

    I like having all the addons via USB. I can make the base box (MB, laptop HD and slim DVD) very small. If I need a tuner, plug one in. If I need another device, plug it in too. As long as it comes in USB...

    Ahh, a pc the size of a large paperback.

  69. Re:useless to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hmmm, maybe a new motherboard would be the right answer. Sounds like it was a cheapo to begin with.

  70. hear, hear by timothy · · Score: 1

    I'm glad that 802.11 is becoming closer to a standard option on (esp. portable) hardware. The lack of external antenna options when it's built in is a pain, though: my fancy new wireless card with antenna jacks is cool so long as there's a PCMCIA slot to stick it into, but I can't use it in my iBook, only my x86 laptop.

    I used to care about having a slot (or a serial port) for a modem, but nowadays, wireless and ethernet takes care of that even if it's a modem the data is eventually going over, because an external modem hooked to a base station is a more flexible solution anyhow.

    What I would like to see in these things though is 1) a PCMCIA slot (or two); despite what I just said about modems, I have a couple of PCMCIA modems and ethernet cards, would be nice to be able to use them to extend a system and 2) CF card slot (or two), likewise, so I could use the CF 802.11 card from my Zaurus, could dump in digital photos without a dangling reader, etc.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  71. cool! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    good excuse for me to setup an obsd box :-)

  72. Sorry by EvilAlien · · Score: 1

    I, for one, welcome our new tiny form factor Overlords.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  73. Re:useless to me by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 1
    What would you do with a probably $100-$150 paperweight with just Ethernet/serial port connectivity?

    Throw it away and buy a new one. Did you just wake up and discover we've gone to a disposable consumer electronics society? If your TV dies you buy a new one. If your radio dies you buy a new one. If your motherboard dies you buy a new one. Be glad you can still replace the motherboard as a component instead of the entire computer being tied to it as a disposable item. Besides, $100-$150 isn't really a lot of money anymore

  74. Size by Ironsides · · Score: 1

    Any one know what size hard drive this thing will use? If it is a standard 3.5", they could drastically shrink it if they went with those Toshiba hard drives that are 0.85". Would also decrease power consumption too.

    I see a market for these as portable testing tools. Like a FLUKE or something similar. Especially if they add a laptop battery to it.

    --
    Fly me to the moon Let me sing among those stars Let me see what spring is like On jupiter and mars
    1. Re:Size by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

      IDE :) The size of the drive has nothing to do with the protocol they use :) Heck I have allways wanted soemone to build a multi terabyte mass storage IDE device that could be as big as a Foot stool as long as it was right next to cheap :) Its the connectors that change :)

      --
      Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  75. Re:IPv6 (Worse than you think)(Even Worse) by G4from128k · · Score: 1

    Uh oh... now you've got me worried. What happens when a script kiddie hacks into my fridge and orders a million gallons of ice cream in my name? I suppose if it's a Microsoft Fridge (tm), it's going to need frequent patching. Or I could use an Apple Macintosh Fridge, which will be more secure but hold only a few kinds of food.

    LOL! And perhaps Linux fridge would only accept plain-text standardized food found for free on the road side?

    But the script kiddie/Home appliance problem might be worse than you think. What happens when a script kiddie turns the oven on to 500 degrees (remote controlled for warming food) while you are out. Wiping out the home directory is one thing, burning down the home is another.

    --
    Two wrongs don't make a right, but three lefts do.
  76. Mini-PCI? by Cpt_Kirks · · Score: 1

    Just what is available in mini-PCI format?

    I haven't found more that wireless and lan cards.

    1. Re:Mini-PCI? by wolrahnaes · · Score: 1

      http://www.soekris.com/ has a Mini-PCI based hardware encryption device, the vpn1211.

      It is designed to be used with their micro-systems (which are much better suited for the frequently suggested task of being a firewall, due to the available dual NICs), but miniPCI is miniPCI, and there are experimental linux drivers (as well as full driver support for Open/NetBSD)

      --
      I used to get high on life, but I developed a tolerance. Now I need something stronger.
    2. Re:Mini-PCI? by xsecrets · · Score: 1

      and with the built in aes hardware encryption that the nano-itx board has why would you want to whaste your minipci slot for that? It would be much better served with a wireless card to make it into an AP or another lan card to make it into a firewall/vpn device.

  77. Nice firewall by failedlogic · · Score: 1

    Would be nice to see one of these boards with dual on-board NICS. Combined with a CD-ROM or Flash memory storage, would make a nice small Firewall system.

  78. Network DivX Player by amembleton · · Score: 1

    How about booting one of these off a CF card and running it as a silent Network based DivX player? No fans or hard-disk and it has a TV-Out! :D

    *This isn't my idea. I just took it from Jonty, thanks mate.

    1. Re:Network DivX Player by sxpert · · Score: 1

      it has PXE, so you can boot from the network... that should be good enough :D

  79. Re:useless to me by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 0

    Besides, $100-$150 isn't really a lot of money anymore

    It is if you're a student, or unemployed.

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  80. Re:useless to me by e+r+i+k+0 · · Score: 1
    Besides, $100-$150 isn't really a lot of money anymore

    Yes, it is. Some people aren't as well off as you seem to be. Consider the average wage in India - less than $5 (Am) per day.

  81. Re:useless to me by BuckaBooBob · · Score: 1

    PCI?!? ISA?!?! do you realize tjose slots are longer than the board?!?!? and your PCMCIA slot would take up most of the space on the board... What on earth is it really missing.. Its aimed at a multimedia device and seems to have most everything you would need to do its job... They have totally hit the mark of what the needs of the masses are.. But it does seem to be missing a game port :) but the kb/ms can do with some tweaking :)

    But the real question is can it save you money on your car insurance!

    --
    Who needs WiFi when we can have Packet Over Sheep! http://datacomm.org/PoS-InternetDraft.txt
  82. Re:useless to me by NerveGas · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I once had the DMA controller on a motherboard go bad on me. Do you think that I've stopped buying motherboards without replaceable DMA controllers?

    Just because you once blew out the onboard video doesn't mean that every motherboard will have that happen, or even any more than a very few motherboards.

    Besides, you're just as likely to blow a regular video card as you are to blow the VGA on this board - and that regular video card might just cost *more* to replace than this entire mortherboard!

    If anything, I've found most computer hardware to be much more resiliant and hard to "blow" than I would have imagined. I've hot-(un)plugged just about every type of PC interface there is without damaging the computer (sometimes on purpose, sometimes on accident). And if I went into the stories of things I've seen people do without damaging a computer, your eyes would probably pop out of your head.

    The only thing I've had damaged by hot-(un)plugging was one particular model of monitor from one particular vendor. They weren't designed well, and they'd go "pop" quite often if you plugged them in to a running computer. However, that hasn't stopped me from doing it with some uncountable number of monitors, and no others have ever given me any problem.

    Besides, don't tell me that you'd never buy an Opteron for fear that the memory controller in it would get blown, rendering the rest of the CPU useless.... :)

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  83. Build your own laptop? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cool! Now I can strip out some of my old laptops (like, say, the Itronix XC6250 with a tamper proof screw driver) and fit this nifty mobo inside. If I can just figure out how to interface the LCD display, I'm set. No longer will I deal with trying to conform linux to Itronix's slow board when I can get something else to run in their rugged casing. :)

    Unless...you guys know of someone who sells rugged laptop chassis parts?

  84. Re:useless to me by NerveGas · · Score: 1

    One more thing... whatever gave you the idea that diskless terminals were stuck on an 80x25 screen?

    If you're thinking of a "dumb terminal", that's one thing - but "diskless" and "dumb" are two different things. There's nothing stopping you from booting into your full-fledged GUI on a diskless terminal.

    Look more into the client-server model of X-windows. You'll find that you can even run your GUI very nicely on a relatively dumb terminal

    Shoot, if these things are cheap enough, I've already given a good bit of thought to buying several to use as diskless terminals in my home. I could always buy some $50 clunkers from the thrift store, but they're big, noisy, and use a lot of power. These would be much cooler, in several different senses.

    steve

    --
    Oh, you're not stuck, you're just unable to let go of the onion rings.
  85. Re:useless to me by Phrogger · · Score: 2, Insightful

    >With built-in IDE, USB, sound, ethernet, and video, what do you need a PCI slot for? And considering the trend micro-ATX boards took, you can expect to see dual or quad ethernet and SCSI support within a few months.

    I'd need a PCI slot for a Hauppauge PVR-350 card for a MythTV (http://www.mythtv.org). Small size, no fan, this board would be great otherwise for building a PVR.

  86. Puh-lease! by MarsCtrl · · Score: 1
    Mini-ITX has some pictures here
    Mini-ITX? C'mon, that is, like, so six orders of magnitude ago.
    --

    I was going to put a sig here, but I had already submitted the message.
  87. Price for MythTV compatabile/fast enough system? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Q1: Can any of the via eden cpus handle a myth TV type of workload

    Q2: Can any of these systems handle a decent SVCD and VCD mpeg2 hardware encoder board/usb plugin?

    Q3: How noisy is the system (cpu fan, power supply fan, etc)

    Q4: Any limitations on putting it into a standard audio/video cabinet - (heat dissapation)

    Q5: Can a myth tv system be built with this for $500.00?

    Q6:

  88. Re:useless to me by Brandybuck · · Score: 1

    And if you really need some expansion capabilities, you always have USB - You can get just about anything in a USB form these days.

    Yes, and those "just about anything"s only work under Windows XP.

    As other people have posted elsewhere, until these manufacturers start publishing complete specs or sticking to standards, they're pretty much useless for Linux and BSD users.

    --
    Don't blame me, I didn't vote for either of them!
  89. Re:useless to me by pla · · Score: 1

    I'd need a PCI slot for a Hauppauge PVR-350 card for a MythTV (http://www.mythtv.org).

    Well, technically, yes, you would.

    However, USB and ethernet TV-tuner hardware exists.

    Additionally, for your particular use, you need to consider the power supply... At least with micro-ATX, you usually also get a very weak power supply, on the order of 80W (though you can certainly get a bigger one, you'll start needing active cooling on the PS, and if you use more, you'll need active cooling in the case, too). Throw in a pair of monster HDDs, and watch the PS die.

    I would also question why you need a tiny board for such a use - A pizza-box style ATX case fits in (physically and thematically) just fine in a typical AV setup.

    So, I consider yours a valid point (I'd like to do the same, eventually), but I'd have to say that the combinations of non-motherboard harware available still make a plain ol' ATX board more suitable for use in a home-brew PVR.

  90. "Nano"? by jridley · · Score: 1

    Doesn't look 1 billionth the size of a normal ITX board to me. Should be about the size of a very small dust speck.

    1. Re:"Nano"? by TeknoHog · · Score: 1

      What's a normal ITX? I've never seen one. (Posting from a Mini-ITX.)

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
    2. Re:"Nano"? by jridley · · Score: 1

      Well, one can assume that it's smaller than baby-AT. Take baby-at as a maximum size, hell, take full size AT, the old ones that totally fill an AT case. One billionth of that.

      Oh well, it was a weak joke to start with, and between the two of us we killed it off.

  91. Vapourware ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    There have been stories about this board for months - but no mention of pricing.


    Apart from the possibility that the current production run is committed to the Phantom Game console (and hence no commercial pressure on VIA to sell to anyone else) this is getting annoying.

  92. Re:useless to me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Run the box headless as a server. I did that with my SFF box. I installed linux on it, removed the monitor, and soley accessed it via my LAN.

  93. I'm disappointed . . . by UnknowingFool · · Score: 1

    not by the size of the Nanode or the nano-itx board but by the lack of Beowulf/Xgrid comments.

    --
    Well, there's spam egg sausage and spam, that's not got much spam in it.
  94. Re:useless to me by thynk · · Score: 1

    What would you do with a probably $100-$150 paperweight with just Ethernet/serial port connectivity?

    Ummm.... VNC?

    --

    Good judgment comes from experience, and a lot of that comes from bad judgment.
  95. Still Mini-ITX form factor by kriston · · Score: 1

    The board is still 12cm by 12cm, the same size as the Mini-ITX form factor. The board is the thing carrying the "nano" designation.

    --

    Kriston

    1. Re:Still Mini-ITX form factor by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Mini-ITX is 17cm x 17cm. This is significantly smaller.

    2. Re:Still Mini-ITX form factor by sprprsnmn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Standard Mini-Itx (Eden, Nehemiah, etc) are 17cm x 17cm. This board is 12cm x 12cm, which is roughly half the size.

    3. Re:Still Mini-ITX form factor by Emil+Brink · · Score: 1

      ~> dc
      17 17 * 12 12 * 6k/pq
      2.006944
      Heh. Around these parts, I think that's actually reason to at least drop the "roughly". It's half the size, to at least three significant digits. ;^)

      --
      main(O){10<putchar(4^--O?77-(15&5128 >>4*O):10)&&main(2+O);}
  96. SIGH by medelliadegray · · Score: 1

    i can not wait till they release a version of these with 2x nic's, and preferably a real PCI slot.

    i want to make an uber NAS/Firewall/Gateway which will be more friendly toward power consumption (and ears) vs my p2 system.

    i am half tempted to just get the mini-itx CL, and buy a hardware crypto card, and take my chances and see if one of the PCI riser cards with 2 slots will work, so i can throw in a wi-fi connection as well... or sped half as much and get the original mini-itx board, and due w/o hardware crypto.

    --
    Troll, Troll, go away and flame again some other day
  97. Re:useless to me by erlenic · · Score: 1

    You wouldn't even need a game port, there are plenty of joysticks with USB connectors on them. In fact, I'd guess that almost all joysticks are USB now.

  98. Re:Price for MythTV compatabile/fast enough system by amix · · Score: 2, Informative

    Dude! Why don't you just read the specs ?

    It's got an MPEG2/MPEG4 chip, okay ?!

    Q1: Yes

    All C3 "Nehemiah" CPUs starting at 1GHz can do this. I assume, since I do not use MythTV. I use the C3 on a full-fledged server and used it for KDE/Desktop work for months. I had no problems replaying standard MPEG2/MPEG4. The EPIA boards have an MPEG2 decoder, the new ones will have MPEG4 in addition. The new CPU will be faster then the one I use.

    Q2: Yes. Many people use a TV card with MPEG2 encoder on their EPIA systems

    Q3: Noiseless if you cool it passive

    Q4: No, people have done it with the even larger EPIAs

    Q5: That depends on your skills and desired features. The Nano-ITX board *might* cost around USD200-250 at introduction. Got this from a sales-guy at a Mini-ITX shop I know.

    --
    Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
  99. Re:useless to me by amix · · Score: 1

    No. You missed the point. Sorry!

    The Nano-ITX is no match!

    As for portable: It is too large

    As for SFF: It is too small, useless in most occasions.

    Nano-ITX is too large for portables. In fact, all this buzz about this board leaves me cold. Several companies in the IPC business do PIII based systems with all the interfaces of a generic ATX, plus two PCMCIA, plus dual LAN, incl. Mini-PCI for years. They are even smaller as this one, but not aimed at the mass-market. Sadly.

    I am currently running a low-power, passive cooled qiuet and small system on a VIA C3 "Nehemiah". The availability of three PCI on the VIA C3M266-L ATX board (no AGP) allows for:

    • 2nd NIC, using a special NIC with embedded firewall on it (SNapgear PCI630)
    • 4ch S-ATA RAID Controller with cache and XOR
    • WLAN Card

    This is my "workgroup" server in my living room. Thus I built the case myself. I get a fax-printer-file-mail-web-etcetera-server with a seperate firewall and WLAN access-point plus fast and secure RAID-5 and the option to hotswap the fourth S-ATA disk (use it for backup), thanks to VIAs efforts in the low-power market. I cool it passive. It's noiseless ! I modded the PSU.
    However, while I do not consider this system (NanoITX) as useless "noiseless" and "low power" won't be the features to sell this. Where I see it being adopted is in cars or boats.

    As for noiseless: I am wondering where VIA keeps its C5P hidden. That is the same CPU core as on the NanoITX but was planned for So370 and SMP. I would love to exchange my current Mobo/CPU against a similare mobo with dual C5P for this application.

    .
    --
    Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
  100. Re:useless to me by amix · · Score: 1

    Why don't you get an EPIA (same manufacturer) ? They can be passiveley cooled and come with 1x PCI. Price is a little higher, of course (includes CPU).

    --
    Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
  101. But it is not per-impression anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you do not click on the adds, you are not doing anyone any favors either.

    I do not own a credit card as a matter of principle. For this reason, products sold online are useless to me beyond brand recognition.

    I have never purchased a product that I saw in an unsolicited internet ad.

    Show me new razors, new toothpaste, new food, or something, and it might influence my purchasing decisions.

    But beyond the essentials I simply do not make purchases.

    1. Re:But it is not per-impression anymore by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, you are also an atypical web user. So why are you opinion matter?

  102. NanoITX + 1x PCI = VIA EPIA by amix · · Score: 1

    Why don't you folks, who need a PCI just get an EPIA ? NanoITX is 120mm x 120mm in size. EPIA is 170mm x 170mm, can be cooled passively (most, some reuqire a little modding) and feature one PCI.

    --
    Hello?? Fred?! Is this you?
    1. Re:NanoITX + 1x PCI = VIA EPIA by HoneyBunchesOfGoats · · Score: 1

      What would be interesting (though I know it'd be impossible for the first boards, since they've been in R&D for months now) is if they put a 1x PCI-express slot on there; it's definitely small enough to fit.

      Something I personally would like to see is all the ports on the back of the board turned into headers, with ribbon cables to mount the ports anywhere you want. You could put them in a row on the back, and only use the ones you need or want.

    2. Re:NanoITX + 1x PCI = VIA EPIA by TeknoHog · · Score: 1
      Something I personally would like to see is all the ports on the back of the board turned into headers, with ribbon cables to mount the ports anywhere you want. You could put them in a row on the back, and only use the ones you need or want.

      Good point. I have an EPIA MII and it has plenty of headers onboard, such as parallel, extra USB, extra 1394, LVDS. I find most of the back-panel ports useful so I don't mind the current setup. The problem is getting those extra dongles for the actual ports; in the end the headers are just non-standard variants, and who wants non-standard? For example, if I want a parallel port on my MII, I'll either have to buy one made by VIA or roll my own, neither of which is the most convenient option.

      --
      Escher was the first MC and Giger invented the HR department.
  103. Re:useless to me by Coolnquiet · · Score: 1

    If I read the articles correctly, it has a mini-PCI slot on the underside.

  104. Re:Price for MythTV compatabile/fast enough system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What concerns me is that hardware manufactures add in special features, e.g., a mpeg4 decoder chip, that do not work well or only work in limited situations.

    Is there any mpeg2 hardware encoder card that can do 30fps at 480 x 480 or higher that works with this motherboard?

  105. Via Eden chip be perfect for a Multi Core CPU? by nihilistcanada · · Score: 1

    With it small die size and ultra low power needs wouldnt the Eden CPU be perfect for a multi-core cpu? How hard would it be to modify it to do this? You could put 4 or more cpus on it and take up the die real estate of a regular cpu.

  106. Re:useless to me by MartinB · · Score: 1

    Something like a Tranquil Smooth Server perhaps? Mini-ITX based, with Smoothwall Corporate pre-installed.

    Pictures

    --

    The only thing you can accurately describe as "Scotch" is a sticky tape made by 3M. And it's

  107. Mini-PCI to PCI by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Just to top people complaining, there is a Mini-PCI to PCI convertor available here combined with a flexible Mini-PCI extender then you're all set for PVR-350 and MyhtTV goodness!!

  108. motorcycle-based GPS system anyone? by firestarter · · Score: 1

    I already have a full GPS system on my motorcycle - complete with autorouting etc.

    You guys are living in the past! :-)

  109. Re:Price for MythTV compatabile/fast enough system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Just wanted to correct you on a fact that I've seen a lot of people get wrong.

    You mention that "The EPIA boards have an MPEG2 decoder, the new ones will have MPEG4 in addition."

    The EPIA boards (and quite a few other gfx chipsets: ati, nvidia etc ..) do NOT have a mpeg2 decoder onboard !!

    What they have is "integrated hardware based MPEG-4/2 acceleration" -- taken from http://mini-itx.com/news/nanode/

    Which, simple means that the card has 2 features a viable:

    some sort of fast copy acceration (aka fast bitblt)
    some sort of hardware scaling (like the Xv extension for X)

    I haven't looked into whats diffrent with there new boards that adds MPEG4 acceration. New hardware features ? or just some MPEG4 codecs that use the acceration features ?

  110. OT Strange Name by LinuxHam · · Score: 1

    Boy, Glen seems to like the sound of his name, from this feedback form to your post. It has a creepy Branch Davidian feel to it. Also, I once lived near Glen Gardner New Jersey, which wins the Google popcon in a big way. Maybe that's why it creeps me out.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  111. Re:IPv6 (Worse than you think) by prelelat · · Score: 1

    "Or I could use an Apple Macintosh Fridge, which will be more secure but hold only a few kinds of food."

    A bowl of apples.

  112. It Doesn't. ALL appliances should be natted!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Morons!

    OK. I'm officially tired of the

    "We need more address space because my will need an ip address in the future."

    Right after we scrap all the security work everyone's been doing for the last 20 years.

    NEXT!?

  113. Bull. Shit. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here are the drivers.
    "In case the driver binary does not work properly or contains bugs, its source code is available for users to modify and compile"
    and here are the tech specs.

    go knock yourself out

  114. I know that quote 8p by da5idnetlimit.com · · Score: 1

    Obviously 8)

    --
    It takes 40+ muscles to frown, but only four to extend your arm and bitchslap the motherfucker
  115. VIA support Open Source weakly by The+Famous+Brett+Wat · · Score: 2, Informative
    Just in case anyone takes the AC above too seriously, here are a bunch of more-informative links.

    On hunting around, I found the EPIA Linux Howto, which is a January 2004 publication (apparently), and fairly nifty. In the chapter on video support, the editor interjects with a clarifying comment about hardware MPEG support, stating, "The source code is available to large OEM customers under NDA/licensing agreements. It is not available to end-users." Strike one for open source.

    The video drivers for EPIA-M boards can be downloaded from their CLE266 Linuxpage. There is a note about source code at the bottom of this page. They say the following about full source code access: "Users need to sign Binary License Agreement (BLA) and Source Code Addendum (SCABLA) to obtain the source. Typically, only requests from companies developing product for sale will be approved." Strike two for open source.

    But there's a more limited source release available, apparently, and for that you need to go to the VIA Open Source Developer's Data Request Form. Here you will be warmly greeted with the following notice, accompanied by a honking great form full of mandatory personal information fields.

    VIA want to make available code and other resources to appropriate open source developers. In order to be accepted into the programme and have downloads made available, requests must be made via this form.

    Once the form is complete, has been submitted and reviewed, your application may be approved. If successful you will receive an e-mail to the address specified by you on this form. This mail must be responded to otherwise your access will not be enabled.

    VIA's open source support is weak at best. Maybe there are good reasons why they are obliged to put obstacles in the way of everything, rather than just providing the damn code, but their pitch as given leaves me pretty cold. I like their stuff, but I'm sick of half-baked software support.

    --
    proof, n. A demonstration that a conclusion is implied by certain premises and axioms.
  116. This guy is obviously a troll. I mean really, he by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    spelled everything correctly and didn't even misspell
    "a lot". Couldn't even put in one statement that
    used lose. Wow. Deep cover troll for sure.
    Be careful folks.

  117. As long as you're using the network by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    why even have a harddrive? Boot something
    off the network, even a knoppix image
    would work great.

  118. Confusing? by Tellalian · · Score: 1

    From the article, it seems he's suing everyone except the people who actually created the libelous content. Anyone know why?

  119. Re:It's more than just the engine by msim · · Score: 1

    your engine idle was running a bit lean.
    If it was carby, i would have suggested you tweak the idle adjustment screw. Get the twonkers to make your idle a bit richer, another alternate is to use the idle adjustment screw and up the revs by 100-150. see if that works as a temporary measure. :-)

    that is unless you've aleready gotten it fixed.

    --

    Life is like a box of chocolates, you never know when your gonna get food poisoning.
  120. Re:IPv6 (Worse than you think) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Your fridge might need range of IPs addys if it has an ice maker, RFID-reading intelli-chiller, home-message center, Kalory-Kounter terahertz sensor array, Phreshness Gas Sensor, Open-Door SMS alert sender, remote shopping list VPN website, etc.

    Yeah, just like my computer needs a range of IP addresses to act as a web server, SMB server, FTP server, SMTP relay, DNS server and Gnutella peer.

  121. Re:Price for MythTV compatabile/fast enough system by ErroneousBee · · Score: 1

    Last time I looked, someone at VIA (or whereever) were working with the mplayer guys to allow mplayer to use the hardware accelleration. The 1Ghz chip was 'just' capable of playing a dvd without skipping, although heat became a problem.

    Some info here: http://www.viaarena.com/?PageID=373#libddmpeg

    --
    **TODO** Steal someone elses sig.