Slashdot Mirror


PeopleAggregator - An Open Source Social Network

prostoalex writes "When Orkut, LinkedIn, Friendster, Zaibatsu and Tribe.net just don't cut it, meet PeopleAggregator, an open-source, PHP-written, FOAF-based social network. There's the site and there's the source in case you decide to launch your own. I found out about PeopleAggregator reading this interview with Mark Canter on Read/Write Web today." I wish such sites would provide profile-conversion tools to encourage jumping ship from one to another.

70 of 263 comments (clear)

  1. Wow by panxerox · · Score: 5, Funny

    Another (better?) method to avoid coming in physical contact with other people.

    --
    "It's so convenient to have a system where everyone is a criminal" - A. Hitler
    1. Re:Wow by boarder8925 · · Score: 2, Funny
      Another (better?) method to avoid coming in physical contact with other people.
      AIM, Slashdot, and phpBB just were't enough.
    2. Re:Wow by Canberra+Bob · · Score: 2, Interesting

      At least with an open-source community, we will not have our socieities social structures dictated by large corporations. Face it, using the internet as our primary means of communicating is inevitable. We should at least try to keep control of our communication rather than pass control over to some corporation who treats their bottom line as more important than society as a whole.

    3. Re:Wow by l1_wulf · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Social networks are only as useful as your own perceptions. While not a proponent myself, I've seen valid declarations for and against them (in general), open or closed (to the public), etc. It seems that those that look to them for substitutions for an actual social life are typically disappointed since male to female ratios are nominal at best. On the other hand those that look to these networks as opportunities to meet people (or keep in contact with people) from varied backgrounds and locations who share interests or needs (programming help, contractors, games, etc.) generally have much better luck than say randomly talking to someone in a bar.

      If these networks were to try and cater to the lonely hearts out there, they would be no better than dating services, except they would likely prove to be disappointing in that regard, little better than just jumping into any of the myriad chat rooms out there. Perhaps this is validating invitation only networks (ala Orkut), who's to say?

      A drawback to social networks is end user propagation and activity. Maintaining, checking, browsing and so on seems, to me at least, like a time consuming activity. One which I lack the desire and the time to follow. I tend to be a bit of a hermit, often times putting my IMs as away just to concentrate on the task at hand while I sit at my computer. I suppose when the "killer" social network comes along, I'll sign up and stay, until then they remain little more than academic interests in a field that is reaching oversaturation and little innovation.

    4. Re:Wow by the+argonaut · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Face it, using the internet as our primary means of communicating is inevitable.

      Please tell me where I can get off whatever train you're riding on, because I don't think your world is or will be a very nice place to live in.

      75% of the communications I have with people are still good old fashioned face-to-face conversations, and I would venture a guess that for most people the number is not much different. For most people the internet is replacing the ways we would communicate over long distances (phone call, snail mail), but it's not, nor do I think it ever will be, a suitable replacement for real physical interactions. And if I am somehow proven wrong, please shoot me before it happens.

      I agree with everything else you said. Developers have already decimated our town squares, traditional shopping districts, and other public spaces and replaced them with malls and other quasi-public areas, where the only speech and the only activities allowed are the ones they deem to be "appropriate". Why should we let them fully enclose our virtual commons as well?

      --
      fuck you.
    5. Re:Wow by persaud · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Unless virtual is prelude to physical.

    6. Re:Wow by digitaleus · · Score: 2, Interesting
      it's hard to turn something as huge as communication into a scalar.

      The most meaningful communication generally happens face-to-face, and this is unlikely to change without some seriously dystopic biotech. However, in terms of the time I spend communicating, much of it isn't face to face, given that I sit in front of a PC all day. Rather, MSN and weblogs commenting forms a large chunk of my daily "chit chat".

  2. Looks like by xSquaredAdmin · · Score: 5, Funny

    it aggregated too many people.

    --
    Crushing dreams at the speed of sarcasm
    1. Re:Looks like by frenetic3 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Looks like a sausagefest too. Marc? Ben? Roland? Sean?

      I need Charlenes here people. Claires. Colettes. Tortured twentysomething souls who lean forward in sleazy web cam shots just to show a little cleavage.

      Work with me here! :)

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    2. Re:Looks like by pollock · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I need Charlenes here people. Claires. Colettes. Tortured twentysomething souls who lean forward in sleazy web cam shots just to show a little cleavage.

      I think you're looking for Orkut.

    3. Re:Looks like by SuperBanana · · Score: 2, Interesting
      ?it aggregated too many people.

      Friendster's got 'em beat. Their technology is so good, they don't need a slashdotting to go under.

      A few weeks back they implemented an emergency "how many degrees of separation do I want people to see" feature, and the default was pretty low. They had to do it because their MySQL database was choking for weeks to the point that you could log in, but any further activity would hang until the applet returned a connection-timed-out error.

  3. *cough* by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Slashster

    Slashster is an Open Source PHP / Mysql based FOAF.

    Congrats to PeopleAggregator for making Slashdot though. Dunno why my site didn't make front page... Heh.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  4. What's the point ? by Sonic+McTails · · Score: 2, Informative

    Even though opensource is a good thing, why make it so anyone can install it. If it's not certizilied, it's not going to make many hits or matchs. If it was two people like over /. or a message board, that would be different because you aren't looking for a stranger.

    --
    This signature was left intentionally blank.
  5. the wonders of PHP: by rokzy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Warning: mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/adodb /drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 251

    Warning: mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/adodb /drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 251

    Session: connection failed

    Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cookie - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/adodb /drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php:251) in /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/main. php on line 36

    Warning: session_start(): Cannot send session cache limiter - headers already sent (output started at /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/adodb /drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php:251) in /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/main. php on line 36

    Warning: Cannot modify header information - headers already sent by (output started at /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/adodb /drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php:251) in /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/main. php on line 37

    1. Re:the wonders of PHP: by ChibiOne · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You mean "the wonders of bad programming techniques"

    2. Re:the wonders of PHP: by justMichael · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That has nothing to do with PHP.

      That comes from an incompetent server admin.

      Rule #1 for production PHP:
      php.ini -> display_errors = Off

    3. Re:the wonders of PHP: by TardisX · · Score: 5, Informative

      Errr, surely rule #1 is to make sure you allow more mysql processes than maximum apache children?

      Is it a common php 'admin' mindset to just hide errors rather than make sure they don't happen in the first place?

      --

      Command attempted to use minibuffer while in minibuffer
  6. Nerdy friend connection? by dealsites · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What ever happened to people meeting at the mall, bars, concerts, school, etc...??

    I hate to admit it, but I imagine most of these social-network people are the nerdy type. Not that I'm saying that's bad, but most of us probably already have some nerdy friends. Why not get out and meet people in real life to havae a well-balanced friend social network?

    Although the open-source project is cool.

    --
    These are the deals you can't pass up. Real-time updates on all the best stuff. You won't be sorry! Check out the hot deal search page too!

    1. Re:Nerdy friend connection? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      What ever happened to people meeting at the mall, bars, concerts, school, etc...??

      You don't belong here.

    2. Re:Nerdy friend connection? by Siniset · · Score: 3, Insightful

      dude, i'm the nerdy one in my group of friends (those from high school) and i was the last one to join friendster, and it was only because they were all on it. It's like IMing, it used to be a nerdy thing, now is just a young-person thing...

    3. Re:Nerdy friend connection? by bcrowell · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Why not get out and meet people in real life to havae a well-balanced friend social network?
      Here are a few reasons:
      • I work. My wife works. We have two kids.
      • There are a lot of nice people in my neighborhood, but we have nothing in common with them.
      • There are a lot of nice people I work with, but they all live 40 miles away.
      • I like ultimate frisbee, but how do I find people in my area who want to play? The internet was the only way I could find.

      Note that meeting people through the internet doesn't preclude following up by meeting them in real life. Just because you talk to people on the phone, that doesn't mean you never see them face to face.

    4. Re:Nerdy friend connection? by God!+Awful+2 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Although the open-source project is cool.

      Yeah, with a name like PeopleAggregator it sounds *so* cool. I bet they spent a whole 5 minutes on that one.

      -a

  7. Reminds me of a joke... by alan_dershowitz · · Score: 5, Funny

    hearing about technical people writing "social networking" software.

    How do you tell if an engineer is an extrovert?

    He looks at YOUR shoes when he's talking.

  8. XFN by cgranade · · Score: 4, Informative

    An open-source social protocol already exists... not a site, but an XML protocol for marking links as having a social significance. The recently announced Nvu supports links with XFN information. I would love to see if this network supports XFN, so that it could tie into other XFN-compliant networks and sites.

    --

    #define DRM chmod 000

    1. Re:XFN by pldms · · Score: 2, Informative

      FOAF (which PeopleAggregator uses, as do many other sites) and it's relation to XFN are discussed here, and in depth by Leigh Dodds. It would be pretty hard to make something like PeopleAggregator using XFN since it's concerned with typing relations, not describing people. FOAF and XFN don't really compete. (btw, FOAF came first)

      --
      Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
      me a number based on the order in which I joined
  9. Note to everyone: by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    You don't need a program, website, or even a computer to make friends.
    You just open the door, go outside and...OH MY GOD, the SUN, it BURNS&..&}=20 ]} } } }&..}=3Dr}'}"}[NO CARRIER]

  10. Friendster and open source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    A bit OT, but while the friendster code may not be open, sure looks like they love it on the backend

    http://www.friendster.com/jobs/

    They even use an acronymn, LAMP, to refer to Linux, Apache, MySQL, PHP/PERL/Python

    1. Re:Friendster and open source by frenetic3 · · Score: 4, Funny

      sure looks like they love it on the backend
      mysql_pconnect(): Too many connections in /usr/web/peopleaggregator/env_production/lib/adodb /drivers/adodb-mysql.inc.php on line 251

      looks like this site just took it in the backend. :P

      -fren
      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
  11. I get too many emails already. by sulli · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can someone build a PeopleGoAwaytor (tm)?

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
    1. Re:I get too many emails already. by don.g · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean like Introvertster?

      --
      Pretend that something especially witty is here. Thanks.
  12. Re:This passes for news? by pavon · · Score: 5, Funny

    Okay... So this is yet another social network. Except it open sourced. Hell, the blurb tells you how many social networks there already are. Why does this pass as news?

    Because, since the source is open, we geeks can modify it work in ways the original author never dreamed. Like implementing a social network of one, or creating a network of AI friends. It would also be perfect for modeling the intricate relationships of the cast of ST:TNG. The possibilities are endless!

    Could you do any of that with your proprietary invitation only network? I didn't think so.

  13. Steal this book? No, steal this business! by David+Hume · · Score: 2, Interesting



    Steal This Book? No, steal this business!

    And programmers wonder why they're unemployed. :)

    Listen, this is great. I mean, I like receiving a gift as much as the next guy, but...

    I always wonder what people are thinking when they start a business like this and then immediately open source the code and make it publicly available so that anyone and everyone can immediately compete.

    Oh, wait. They're going to make their money on support. Or is it custom applications?

    And just how do you explain this to the VC? How do you word this on the prospectus?

  14. Think FOAF is fluff? It is -- but... by gregwbrooks · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ... but it can be one hell of a business tool, too. I've met people I'd never meet otherwise and gotten projects I'd never have heard about simply by starting up conversations on LinkedIn.

    If you're a cubicle rat, then yeah, I guess the whole FOAF thing seems a little too much like high school dating logistics. But if you translate introductions into opportunities and know how to write a compelling message, then some of these social networks are godsends.

    --


    "It was a summer's tale: Just a boy, his Linux, and a head full of dreams..."
  15. Social Networking Experiment by illuminata · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anybody want to be my friend :) :) :) :)??? Post below ;)!





    ... :(

    Experiment failed.

    --


    Until Slashdot fixes the funny modifier, use insightful or interesting. The poster knows your intentions.
    1. Re:Social Networking Experiment by Xeed · · Score: 3, Funny

      I will be your friend.... oh, wait...

      I can't do that, sorry. It just wouldn't work out between us.

      I've seen your past comments, and I'm just looking for someone with a little more karma. Also, your UID is a little too high for my taste. You're just not my type.

      It's not you, it's me.

      --
      ...don't question it!!!
  16. Compare to plane fare by tepples · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What ever happened to people meeting at the mall, bars, concerts, school, etc

    Not everybody knows how to drive an automobile. Not everybody drinks alcohol. Not everybody can afford tickets to those few live performances offered at venues friendly to those who either by choice or by statute do not drink alcohol. Some students ride a bus to and from school and thus do not have time to meet beforehand or afterwards.

    In addition, electronic FOAF systems are much cheaper than inter-city bus fare or airplane fare for meeting friends who have interests that aren't all that common in smaller cities of 50,000 or so.

  17. Six more degrees by digitalhermit · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I've been carrying out an experiment over the past few months to get in touch with a famous author/mathematician. He's written on the subject and it just absolutely fascinates me. The idea is to send a few letters to friends and see how quickly it can reach the destination through the hops. Theoretically you could get to the author with just six or seven hops. I sent a few letters to some associates but these got only to the third or fourth level before dying out. I'm going to increase the initial broadcast with a different, more academic oriented group this time. Software like the link shows (well, what I got before the ./ing) is almost perfect to track the results.

    On a related note, a book called "Nexus" by M. Buchanan discusses social and other networks. Decent treatment, but unfortunately no equations or numbers.

  18. In case it gets slashdotted by bluenirve · · Score: 5, Funny
    In case the site gets taken down:
    Damn.

    Oh hell. We got slashdotted. And the main site wasn't even running the current code revision. Back in a bit. 19:14CST
    oops..
  19. The most interesting people .... by EmbeddedJanitor · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I've ever come in contact with can hardly read or write (some can't do either) and are not computer savvy and don't have computers. It seems to me that internet-based "society" will be as boring, and as socially stimulating as being a white anglosaxon protestant male and attending a white anglosaxon protestant male boarding school. ie. Lotsa self and group masturbation but no clue what the real planet is about.

    --
    Engineering is the art of compromise.
    1. Re:The most interesting people .... by a+whoabot · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Self/self-group(the group is the self) masturbation for sure. Everyone just ambivalently "holds" everyone else in the group up: everything is always "postive" and weak. It's like the LiveJournal hordes, and if someone posts something that upsets their soft, narrow world-view they delete it immeadiately instead of trying to learn something. This emerging internet society, instead of being the kaleidoscopic meeting of hundreds of cultures as foretold, is just a banal droning of entertainment and pointless discussion.

  20. Re:Steal this book? No, steal this business! by frenetic3 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The value in friendster is not the technology really -- witness the number of open-source ripoffs (there are several more besides this one, even -- slashster and others have been mentioned) and so on. It's the critical mass of millions of users they've attained.

    You can have the slickest and fastest social networking site (or IM client, or p2p client, or "portal"...) in the world but without users (no, being open source is not a "feature", end users don't care), a killer feature/gimmick, or an insane marketing budget, it's useless.

    -fren

    --
    "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
  21. Re:MOD PARENT INSIGHTFUL by Lord+of+Ironhand · · Score: 3, Funny
    Any way to turn off display of males?

    apt-get remove mutt

    Ehrm...

  22. Future ideas by Trejkaz · · Score: 4, Insightful

    So true. And whereas this was an obvious Slashdot Effect joke, there is some insight hidden behind the idea.

    Obviously the concept of a social network site where the entire network has to register with one site is going to be doomed to failure in the end.

    The first problem is that in order to build a social network big enough to fit everyone interested in being registered on the network, you need a cluster big enough to store every user on the Internet. By my guess, Orkut is the only one with access to this kind of cluster size, because it is hosted by Google.

    The second problem is that as soon as you have two social network sites, you have a problem where someone wants to be on both sites. Then you add a third site and you have a problem where that person wants to be on three sites. How many social network sites are there now?

    This is the same problem we already see with instant messaging, and is why the newer, more sophisticated IM systems such as Jabber allow the servers to intercommunicate. You can be on whatever server you want, and have contacts on your list who are on whatever server they want.

    So here is my idea: distribute the social networks. A user joins the server they want, is allocated a user id which is user@domain.com, analogous to a Jabber ID, and they can add people to their network who exist on other servers.

    Communities would work similarly with community@communities.domain.com, people join a community by registering their user ID on the server which hosts the community. For instance, the Slashdot community might be slashdot@communities.slashdot.org.

    Now, if all these communities can export FOAF and RDF and agree on how to do any other kind of data manipulation, any program can easily merge cross-site data together to form larger networks if they need, and the work won't have to be done by a single server, it can be done on the client at the user's leisure.

    And more importantly, the solution will actually scale.

    Who's with me?

    --
    Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    1. Re:Future ideas by frenetic3 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      a friendster or orkut would have no incentive to do this.

      their critical mass of millions of members is their biggest asset (and the thing that is hard to acquire -- the tech part is relatively easy; witness all the knockoffs); opening it up to all other comers (i.e. their competitors) would be foolish, just as it would be foolish for AOL/AIM to open up their user base to MSN, their biggest competitor (unless both user bases were equally sized, in which case they would both benefit equally, or the smaller network paid the larger one for access.)

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    2. Re:Future ideas by TyrelHaveman · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sounds interesting. I'm too busy reading slashdot all day to implement such a thing, though.

    3. Re:Future ideas by Trejkaz · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Did anybody say Orkut and Friendster had to do it?

      Look at the situation with instant messaging. You say AOL vs. MSN are in competition and will never cooperate, but who cares? Everyone who cares about interoperation can use Jabber, and it works. We have a fully distributed IM system, which works, which AOL and MSN are just not a part of but hey, who cares?

      In the same way, every non-Orkut, non-Friendster social networking site in the world could implement this distributive feature, and the distributive nature would work despite Orkut and Friendster not implementing it.

      This lack of a feature would eventually draw people away from Orkut and Friendster unless they implemented it as well, which to me sounds like an incentive to implement it. Of course I'm not taking into account that they might be stupid. :-)

      The big difference here is that I suspect the size of non-Orkut and non-Friendster social networks is far larger than the size of non-AOL and non-MSN instant messaging networks.

      --
      Karma: It's all a bunch of tree-huggin' hippy crap!
    4. Re:Future ideas by oliverk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I agree with you both...FOAF doesn't work without interconnectivity and there's a huge disincentive for FOAF providers to open their network because the positive network effects are the entire reason behind doing this. That, of course, brings me to the open source issue.

      The backend code for Slashter and PeopleAggregator are both GPL'd. That's great and very much in the flavor of "information wants to be free." The challenge is that the relationships here are the real information, and until this is all opened up there's really no freedom.

      I met with a few MSFT reps to talk about the possibilities of Passport, and one of the diagrams they showed us had these relationships between user id and every connection you would want to make (web sites, email, chat, credit cards, online shopping, bill pay...pretty much all of it). Don't bother with the anti-MSFT stuff...I'm already a convert. But consider the big idea behind it: have one public id and one private id and free us to exchange with whomever we want. That's true freedom from the Yahoo!'s, AOLs and MSN's of the world.

      We spend a huge amount of time thinking about platforms and software that we can give away for free but maybe that doesn't really matter. I don't care so much that all of these different open source word processors work...I care that they allow me to fulfill the task at hand and share my work with others. I don't care if I use Photoshop or Gimp, but I DO care if I can share high-quality images with my clients. And I don't care if I use a Yahoo! account or a Friendster account...what I want most is to just connect with services and people and let the rest of this all be transparent. And from my perspective, this sounds like the next big opportunity for true open source work. Replicate Passport, make it bulletproof and use it to power all of these services. Then you finally take away the power from the big corporations.

      Of course, funding this indefinitely could be a problem. But you could argue the same thing about Linux...so there's a solution in there somewhere.

      --
      ---- Please be nice in case my Slashdot karma ~= my real life karma.
  23. Learn to Dance by handy_vandal · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What ever happened to people meeting at the mall, bars, concerts, school, etc...??

    I'll second this.

    I'm a nerdy, basically shy person myself.

    Learning to dance saved my social life -- talking ballroom dance here, swing and waltz and foxtrot.

    Women go for that stuff, trust me on this one. The fellow who knows how to waltz has got it made. You get to approach strangers, make conversation with them, lead them onto the dance floor, put your hands on them, your arms around them ... move them rhymthmically around the dance floor ... and they love it.

    Paradise!

    -kgj

    --
    -kgj
    1. Re:Learn to Dance by Welsh+Dwarf · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'll second that, though my stuff is traditional Celtic, but where I live, you go to an evening (called Fest-noz, or night party in Breton), and you've made half-dozen friends by 2am, generally of the opposite sex (you need a partner for quit a few of the dances after all). It's not even a case of being a great dancer, or takeing someone home with you, it's just a case of doing something together, and having fun. And that's one of the first steps towards a social life.

      --
      Ask 8 slackers a question, get 10 awnsers (a citation, but I can't remember from who)
    2. Re:Learn to Dance by Angry+Pixie · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Women go for that stuff, trust me on this one. I can validate this comment. We do love men who know how to dance, and it doesn't have to be a trendy hip-hop or house style. You can waltz, tango, or practically anything else because it shows you have a cultural side.

      But if you really want to earn points:

      1. Know something about wine. All men. ALL MEN should know about wine. At least understand the types of wine and how to evaluate a wine's flavor/

      2. Ditch the false bravado. Machismo is attractive initially, but it quickly wears.

      3. Take an interest in your date. Don't let her walk all over you, but show her you appreciate the time you're spending with her.

      4. Be clean. Shave. Use cologne sparingly. Make sure you shoes and your belt match.

      5. Be passionate about something. Have a social cause. Love poetry or literature.

      6. Open doors for ladies, but don't order our dinners without our permission.

      7. It's okay to be a geek. Geeks are sexy. They think about things, but don't brag or act superior because you know more about a subject than your date. Let her know that your geekness includes aspirations.

      8. Pay attention to our non-verbal signals. Women average about 150 non-verbal signals every minute.

      9. Don't be late, but be forgiving if we are.

      10. Above all else, do not end the date with a heart-felt, "Gawd, I'd like to finger you" while escorting your date to her door.

      And as a bonus for you college guys: don't do her homework for her, do offer to help tutor her if you'd like to help. And when you take her out on a date, don't take her to see a movie. 2 hours of silence in a theater isn't going to help her get to know you. Take her to dinner - it doesn't have to be a fancy restaurant, but it should be better than a fast food restaurant. If all you can afford is a corner dive, well, tell her. And tell her that you would (and will someday) take her to someplace much better. At least she'll know you're not just cheap, but that you are hoping for future dates. If she is worth her weight in RAM, she'll appreciate the honesty and be understanding without being judgemental. Go for a walk around town. Sit at an outside cafe and have coffee or ice cream. Go browsing through a department store 45 minutes before it closes. Buy her flowers. These are all good things.

  24. hmmmm by rnd() · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It would be very cool of the Open Source network sites had a way of generating GUIDs for each user and the ability to link together.

    --

    Amazing magic tricks

  25. Yes making funny comments on /. by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 5, Funny
    Sad bastards who get marked funny on slashdot are well known to have no contact with people let alone physical contact with either sex.

    Thank god I am not one of those.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Yes making funny comments on /. by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny
      I'd flag you troll, or informative, or insightful, or flamebait, or anything else that's not funny out of pity, but they took my mod points away when I started pretending that I had a life.

      I was only kidding... Stupid mods. I have no life! Come on guys!

      --
      /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
    2. Re:Yes making funny comments on /. by francium+de+neobie · · Score: 2, Funny

      Is this the newest Karma whore technique?

  26. What about an open source search engine instead? by ChiralSoftware · · Score: 3, Interesting
    There seem to be too many social networking sites these days. How many can one person possibly belong to? What would be cool is an open source search engine, although I don't know if that project is still active. One thing to consider is that open source works well for "products" like GNU/Linux but does not work as well for services like a social networking site. Even a service like our beloved Slashdot may use open source software but it is a commercially-operated ad-sponsored business.

    ---------
    Create your wireless web site

  27. Speaking about Marc Canter by azav · · Score: 2

    It appears his old baby, Macromedia's Director, just got it's development team dissolved/outsourced/offshored to India.

    Don't know what to think.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  28. me also by goon+america · · Score: 2, Funny
    I wish such sites would provide profile-conversion tools to encourage jumping ship from one to another.

    I wish people would go for the common good against their own best interest, too.

  29. Bad joke... by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 2, Funny
    ... an open-source, PHP-written ...

    Good Lord, I'll bet it even uses that PlySkool database, MySQL... It certainly can't be "enterprise" quality... Bahhhh!

    --
    "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
  30. Re:What is FOAF by Gorilla+with+a+Priap · · Score: 5, Informative
    Friend of a Friend

    --
    So, when you're buying antique vases, buy ones with fish. They're worth the most.
  31. But... by atomic-penguin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Is Slashdot not an Open Source Social Network?

    --
    I didn't read the article so sue me!

    --
    /^([Ss]ame [Bb]at (time, |channel.)){2}$/
    1. Re:But... by gblues · · Score: 2, Funny

      No, it's an Open Source Dork Network.

      Get it right. Sheesh.

      Nathan

  32. Re:What is FOAF by Gorilla+with+a+Priap · · Score: 2, Interesting
    --
    So, when you're buying antique vases, buy ones with fish. They're worth the most.
  33. You clearly have no idea as to who is on these by metalhed77 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    All of the friends and acquaintances I know who use social networking are NOT geeky (but then i have few geeky friends, all of whom don't use social networking). All of the people I know using these sites are totally not geeky and are mostly somewhat trendy if a bit on the counter culture side of it believe it or not. I'm 19 however, and people of my age are significantly more tech savy. Perhaps as you get into older people technophobia creeps in.

    Just go on friendster or myspace sometime and you'll notice the fact that most people there are not geeky at all, and that there's probably an even mix of boys and girls.

    --
    Photos.
  34. It's a damn good thing... by PatientZero · · Score: 4, Interesting
    ...email was invented and a widespread standard before the web appeared. Seriously, all the cool new applications on the net are completely fractured, competing with each other for eyeballs to bombard with advertisements.

    I can only hope that we, the net citizens, will eventually push back on these mega sites to get some standards produced.

    Imagine if each ISP ran a standards-compliant IM server for its users. No more "Do you use Yahoo or MSN? No, oh well, we can't chat." Instead, each IM server vendor would compete to have ISPs install their server but work with all other vendors' products instead of segregating users into disparate networks.

    --
    Freedom to fear. Freedom from thought. Freedom to kill.
    I guess the War on Terror really is about freedom!
  35. too many social networks! by boomka · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The idea behind social networks is that in theory, when everyone participates in a social network, you can easily find people through your connections.
    But once you have so many networks (and the craze is only starting) then even in theory you can't have all your friends on the same network.
    At least I know can't possibly be active on all of them.

    I think what networks are aspiring to do is unachievable because their scope is so small. We already have our social network, it's called Internet and it is successful because there is only one Internet.

    --
    Human history becomes more and more a race between education and catastrophe.
    H.G. Wells, "The Outline of History"
  36. Missing the point... by kiwioddBall · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The success of a social networking tool depends on the people that use it - it doesn't depend on whether it is open source or not... If you are wanting to meet different beautiful people I suggest you stay away from a social network where the only people who are going to join are your existing group of friends!!

  37. Update by spellraiser · · Score: 2, Informative
    Damn.

    20:21 Central
    While we scramble behind the scenes to put things back together, we'll share the slashdot love and link to other sites where you can get more information about FOAF.

    FOAF Info:

    FOAF Tools:

    Looks like I picked the wrong week to stop sniffing glue.

    19:14 Central
    Oh hell. We got slashdotted. And the main site wasn't even running the current code revision. Back in a bit.

    --
    I hear there's rumors on the Slashdots
  38. Joy of Dance by handy_vandal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It's not even a case of being a great dancer, or takeing someone home with you, it's just a case of doing something together, and having fun. And that's one of the first steps towards a social life.

    Good points.

    You make friends, you have fun.

    Sure, it can be part of a courtship ritual -- yes, you might get laid -- hell, you might even get married: I did! -- but all that stuff can seem very secondary, when the dance is swinging just right ... it's a joyous thing to do.

    -kgj

    PS - Note to newbie dancers: stop worrying about it, nobody is staring and judging. It's not that you're invisible ... but in my experience, people go dancing to have a good time, not to be "better" than other dancers. Even really good dancers! Some of the best dances I ever danced, my partner was a professional dancer, way more experienced than my amateur self ... and she made me feel like I had all the right moves. Go on, try it -- you'll like it.

    PPS - THE BIG SECRET: learn to lead. (Talking ballroom dance here -- it's different in some other forms of dance.) It's not really about steps! It's about leading ... which means, the leader decides what to do, and the follower follows. Yes yes, the way a follower follows does influence how a leader leads ... but there's the mystery, my friend: there's no way to explain leading a priori ... you simply have to do it until you get it. And when you do, the world's your oyster, mate!

    --
    -kgj
  39. Re:What is FOAF by Cajun+Hell · · Score: 2, Funny

    Foe of a Foe. Don't you want to meet your enemy's enemies? They're your friends, and good candidates for being recruited into your conspiracy.

    --
    "Believe me!" -- Donald Trump
  40. If only they would publish the data using MRN by Alien+Conspiracy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    All these social networks would be much more powerful if they could share data using a system like the Mailbox Reputation Network