I need Charlenes here people. Claires. Colettes. Tortured twentysomething souls who lean forward in sleazy web cam shots just to show a little cleavage.
Those, and a few hundred other sites were submitted by some of the kind people mentioned at the bottom of the page.
Besides that, someone who makes it impossible to visit a disgusting website is a sicko?
I suppose you object to the following as well? # For example, to block unpleasant pages, try: 127.0.0.1 oralse.cx 127.0.0.1 www.oralse.cx 127.0.0.1 goatse.cx 127.0.0.1 www.goatse.cx
Or even better, simply add
199.239.136.212 www.nytimes.com
199.239.136.212 nytimes.com
to your hosts file to fix the "problem" for all normal nytimes.com URLs. The only negative side effect is that the front page no longer works.
Slashdot Mirror
I haven't seen it. Got a .torrent handy?
graffe.com suggests searching for inurl:"ViewerFrame?Mode=".
You can do slightly bettter by searching for inurl:"MultiCameraFrame?Mode=", as mentioned on Metafilter.
You can add the relevant ad servers to your hosts file:
127.0.0.1 adservices.google.com
127.0.0.1 googleadservices.com
127.0.0.1 pagead.googlesyndication.com
127.0.0.1 pagead1.googlesyndication.com
127.0.0.1 pagead2.googlesyndication.com
127.0.0.1 pagead3.googlesyndication.com
127.0.0.1 www.googleadservices.com
Considering the U2 branded iPod, I expect to see Ireland come online first.
"How will this affect evolution?"
Assuming that you meant to say "effect", unless you mix our DNA this will have absolutely no effect on evolution.
You aren't talking about the conscious subjective aspect of an emotion considered apart from bodily changes by any chance, are you?
In that case, feel free to use this version that uses "0.0.0.0" instead.
Am I the only one who expected the parent to come up first on this search?
I'm not convinced that "scientist" is an accurate description of the "US researcher" involved.
A google search for Robert Sarmast doesn't exactly inspire confidence.
There's a discussion about this discussion over in the Gmail community at Orkut.com.
I need Charlenes here people. Claires. Colettes. Tortured twentysomething souls who lean forward in sleazy web cam shots just to show a little cleavage.
I think you're looking for Orkut.
It would be nice if at least the headline and the summary matched.
Seriously. Are you people really getting so much spam every day that the "delete" button just doesn't do it for you?
In short, yes.
I think you may be confused about the effect of a rising Canadian dollar. If the dollar continues to go up, importing an iPod should get cheaper.
New RPMs and RedHat's security advisory for for 7.1, 7.2, 7.3 and 8.0 can be found here.
Redhat has finally posted patched RPMS on their errata pages. Scroll down and select your release.
Those, and a few hundred other sites were submitted by some of the kind people mentioned at the bottom of the page.
Besides that, someone who makes it impossible to visit a disgusting website is a sicko?
I suppose you object to the following as well?
# For example, to block unpleasant pages, try:
127.0.0.1 oralse.cx
127.0.0.1 www.oralse.cx
127.0.0.1 goatse.cx
127.0.0.1 www.goatse.cx
Seeing as people don't seem interested in posting links to archive.nytimes.com, you can always fix the reg. required problem using your hosts file.
Simply add:
199.239.136.212 www.nytimes.com
199.239.136.212 nytimes.com
The only negative side effect is that the front page no longer works. You can always fix that by also adding:
199.239.136.245 frontpage.nytimes.com
Check out someonewhocares.org/hosts/ for more hosts file goodness.
Or even better, simply add
199.239.136.212 www.nytimes.com
199.239.136.212 nytimes.com
to your hosts file to fix the "problem" for all normal nytimes.com URLs. The only negative side effect is that the front page no longer works.
Check out http://someonewhocares.org/hosts/ for more hosts file goodness.
1985: Nintendo Thumb
...unless of course you try to look at the results.
Check out the Public Domain Information Project for information on copyright and public domain issues as they pertain to music.
The difference is that Strauss' music is in the public domain.
Check out PD Info for answers to most of your questions about public domain music.
In particular, notice that Strauss is listed under s .