Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

British Chicken-Warmed Nuke

Posted by ryuzaki0 on from the chickens-is-there-anything-they're-not-good-for? dept.

darrellberry writes "During the Cold War, British researchers developed a nuclear landmine, kept operational during cold conditions by packing it full of live chickens. This story has appeared in a few UK media channels this morning. Probably an April Fools', but who knows? The bomb is supposedly on display at the National Archives in Kew, so if you live in London you can go and see for yourselves..." Also a BBC story and an older New Scientist blurb.

12 of 195 comments (clear)

  1. Not a prank by Space+cowboy · · Score: 5, Informative


    The BBC are running a separate 'this is true, honest' story, detailing other unlikely stories alongside... I like the fact that one of our railways cost more than a trip to the moon.

    Only in the UK...

    Simon

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
    1. Re:Not a prank by Fnkmaster · · Score: 3, Informative

      I think this was Google's April Fool's joke this year. I think the 1 gig email story is more likely true (though the details may be wrong, who knows).

    2. Re:Not a prank by Fishstick · · Score: 3, Informative

      > bad harvest of the italian spaghetti crop

      Swiss, and it was a bumper crop, not a "bad harvest"

      it ranks #1 on the Top 100 April Fool's Day Hoaxes of All Time

      #1: The Swiss Spaghetti Harvest
      In 1957 the respected BBC news show Panorama announced that thanks to a very mild winter and the virtual elimination of the dreaded spaghetti weevil, Swiss farmers were enjoying a bumper spaghetti crop. It accompanied this announcement with footage of Swiss peasants pulling strands of spaghetti down from trees. Huge numbers of viewers were taken in, and many called up wanting to know how they could grow their own spaghetti trees. To this question, the BBC diplomatically replied that they should "place a sprig of spaghetti in a tin of tomato sauce and hope for the best." Check out the actual broadcast archived on the BBC's website (You need the RealVideo player installed to see it, and it usually loads very slowly).

      --

      There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
      Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  2. The Times... by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Informative

    (british broadsheet), is also doing an 'honest guv' type story: http://www.timesonline.co.uk/article/0,,2-1058550, 00.html

  3. Re:Not an April Fool by AndroidCat · · Score: 2, Informative

    Of course, lack of registration makes it hard to see. Try this other site for the real story.

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
  4. Re:Why today? by wfberg · · Score: 4, Informative

    The civil service has obviously had access to these documents for a while, so why do they have to "announce" these apparently real plans on April 1st and then get all irritable and have to deny repeatedly that its an april fools joke.
    Why didn't they release the story yesterday, or couldn't they have waited until tomorrow?

    It was on BBC news yesterday.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  5. Re:April fool or foolish? by Half-pint+HAL · · Score: 2, Informative

    Because plutonium is quite expensive, quite rare and quite unstable. You wouldn't want to put plutonium anywhere near a nuclear device for fear of premature ejac^H^H^Hxplosions. HAL.

    --
    Got them moderator blues I blieve I walk out the do', With these mod-points I been gettin', I 'most never post no mo'
  6. Re:Landmine? by BenBenBen · · Score: 2, Informative
    "Landmine" is a bit of a misnomer - these devices were designed to be planted in the ground on the plains of Germany, and detonated by remote control if there ever came a time when the Sovs were in control of that area.

    Currently, Israel deploys nuclear landmines and I'd guess they're not alone. Shrub's apparent penchant for tactical nukes would suggest that there's going to be more random nuclear weapons in the future too.

    Personally, I want to see a nuclear Dambuster's bomb, in time for the next world stone skimming contest.

    --
    The Slashdot Paradox: "100% Overrated"
  7. Re:Landmine? by Scutter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Read the article.

    The seven-ton weapon, codenamed Blue Peacock, was a state-of-the art munition to be buried on the plains of northern Germany during a British retreat and detonated by remote control or timer to destroy advancing Russian forces in the event of the Third World War.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
  8. Reason WHY its an april fool by mixtape5 · · Score: 2, Informative

    1)chickens are living organisms, how are they to survive while being barried underground? if they put the chickens down they would put them down at the same time as the bomb...and the chickens can survive through the winter?? They should try to survive any day before a winter day

    --
    WoW: Scheod 70 orc warlock on Shadowmoon
  9. See you again... by muffen · · Score: 2, Informative

    Please dupe this story over and over...

    Now even non-subscribers can read the upcoming stories early

  10. Partly a Hoax, partly true! by timbos · · Score: 5, Informative
    Blue Peacock does/did exist. I have the dubious privilege of having touched the only remaining example, housed in the museum collection at AWE. The other is (and I quote the curator here) `lost'!

    It was a `landmine' designed to be set on a timer to ambush the Soviets as they advanced across Europe. It was based on the Blue Danube device that was the UK's first air-delivered nuclear weapon (essentially, they removed the fins).

    The device had up to an 8-day timer, but could also be set off locally --- either by booby trap, incase it was discovered, or a trigger. Amusingly there was a 10 second delay when you operated the trigger, just time to duck and cover :o) The chickens, though? That's clearly a hoax. Apart from anything else, the device was air and water tight.