Slashdot Mirror

← Back to Stories (view on slashdot.org)

Zero Install: The Future of Linux on the Desktop?

Posted by michael on from the plug-and-play dept.

SiegeX writes "Zero Install ,which is apart of the ROX desktop environment is not just a new packaging system, it's a whole new way of thinking; a way that I believe is exactly what Linux needs to become a serious contender for Joe User's desktop. Zero Install uses an NFS to both run *and* install apps from. The apps are all self-contained in their own directory; binaries, docs, source code and all. Once the app has been downloaded its kept in a cache from that point on to minimize delay. The beauty becomes apparent when Zero Install is combined with ROX which runs the application by just clicking on the directory it was installed to. Deleting the application along with all the other misc files is as simple as removing the directory it's contained in. This method of partitioning applications in their own directories also allows installing multiple versions of any application trivial. This is something even the greatest of technophobes could understand and use with ease."

16 of 718 comments (clear)

  1. Someone should tell Apple by SeanTobin · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone should really point this out to Steve. I think using this type on installation on Macs would increase useability by leaps and bounds.

    --
    Karma: SELECT `karma` FROM `users` WHERE `userid`=138474;
  2. I was afraid slashdot wasn't being slashdot by HappyCitizen · · Score: 2, Funny

    We haven't had a "Linux is going to take over the world" story in such a long time....

    --
    http://www.beyourowneviloverlord.tk
    http://www.frozenchickenthrowing.tk
    http://www.killercamel.tk
    1. Re:I was afraid slashdot wasn't being slashdot by ElGnomo · · Score: 1, Funny

      wow, it almost like your comment doesnt apply at all and youve been waiting to say that for a while.
      You blew your load prematurely there buddy. But dont worry, she understands, sure she does...

  3. Right on. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Now I can make my X-box even more useful

  4. WBM link by dioscaido · · Score: 1, Funny

    Anyone have waybackmachine links to DOS or Mac installation routine instructions? It might help this project a lot!

  5. Re:apps contained in their own directories.... by Kralizec · · Score: 1, Funny

    Directory contained applications are hardly anything new. Remember DOS? Those days when Microsoft didn't make it impossible to remove an entire application from your computer.

  6. A good idea, here's why... by heyitsme · · Score: 5, Funny

    It has been implemented in OS X. This is what happens when you drag a .app file (really, a folder. try to cd into one sometime) and copy it to any point on your hard disk (typically /Applications).

    Reminds me of an old joke...

    Microsoft: Where do you want to go today?
    Linux: Where do you want to go tomorrow?
    BSD (in this case, OS X): Are you guys coming or what?!?

  7. If you can make more money, do harm. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2, Funny


    The full name is "Windows Registry Copy Protection and OS Degradation Scheme". It's part of the "Treat all customers like criminals because some are criminals" Initiative.

  8. Re:Going back in time? by Kick+the+Donkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    Yeah.. Everything is stored in Program Files. Except when things are put into C:\Windows\System32. Or the Registery.

    --
    /. is a bunch of nerds at a million typewriters. It's not a political conspiracy determined to undermine your beliefs.
  9. Linux version of clippy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny
    It looks like you're trying to run an application. Would you like to:
    1. Download the latest sourcecode and compile it? (~30 minutes)
    2. Download the pre-compiled binary? (~5 minutes)
    3. Just use the version you downloaded yesterday? (~1 second)
    >3

    You've chosen to run the version you downloaded yesterday. Are you SURE you want to do that? There could be a newer version available. You can't call yourself a hacker if you don't have the latest version.

    1. Yes I'm sure. Just run the program.
    2. I might have mistyped. Show me the options again.
    3. Reboot.
    >1

    Ok, but only because you insist.

    Starting "/usr/bin/bash"...

  10. Re:This sounds perfect... by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Funny

    --
    Member of the Stop Fucking Saying 'M$' army

    Hhhm. I think your sig needs to be abbreviated.

    You should go with: M$F$M$A

    --
    When information is power, privacy is freedom.
  11. Oh Yeah, Great Idea... by Jameth · · Score: 2, Funny

    With fully self-contained apps, we could do away with those silly shared libraries, and we could also just pitch reusing simple programs. Maybe, maybe if we ditched the fifo, we would have finally removed all the flaws in UNIX!

  12. Re:This is also what Microsoft is trying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    You still Windows?

  13. Re:Similarities to Archimedes by pigpogm · · Score: 2, Funny

    I, er... didn't RTFA.

    I mustn't be new around here.

    --
    PigPog.
  14. Re:Don't bitch to Steve by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Bitch to whoever decided that that app should have an installer."

    Installers are just a "solution" to make it more difficult to copy an application to a friend ("casual piracy").

    Soon they will be asking you to insert an original CD-ROM in order to play a game, and, eventually, they will come with a way to require you to "activate" the software. Oh, wait...

  15. Grammer Trolling my own post by spun · · Score: 2, Funny

    I hate it when people don't use apostrophes correctly. It's one of my pet peeves. "It's" gets an apostrophe when it's a contraction of "it is," and loses its apostrophe when it is possesive.

    I even previewed, but it's an easy one to miss.

    --
    - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton