Slashdot Mirror


Overseas Crooks Abuse TTY Phone Service

Rick Zeman writes "The Arizona Daily Star is reporting on how 419 scammers and credit card thieves are abusing the US' TTY service which enables hearing-impaired citizens to make phone calls with the help of an intermediary operator. 'The callers try to use stolen credit-card numbers to make big purchases of merchandise from American companies. The operators often suspect fraud, but they can't just hang up. Federal rules require them to make the calls and keep the contents strictly confidential.' Yes, Virginia, they have no shame...."

22 of 304 comments (clear)

  1. We've gotten this by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Informative

    At the computer shop I run we've literally recieved hundreds of these phone calls. The conversation typically goes like this (but relayed, so it takes forever)

    Do you sell laptops?
    No, we don't sell any laptops.
    How about desktops?
    Yes, we do desktops.
    Will you ship overseas?
    No, no overseas shipments.
    Ok..ok...how about Los Angeles.
    We can do that.
    Ok, I have credit card, I can pay now.
    We'd need some sort of verification that you are the cardholder.

    The conversation goes downhill from there. The first few times we took it seriously, but since then we've refused to take relay calls. If we hear the operator say "This is a relay call" we interrupt and say "Sorry, we don't take relay calls" and then HANG UP. If you don't hang up, the operator will say "hold" while they type out the message and then wait for a response. Waste..of...goddamn...time. Slamming the reciever down helps. If there's any people who genuinely use the service...sorry, we just can't afford to spend hours wading through these phone calls to get to you.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:We've gotten this by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 4, Informative

      They could be fired/jailed for that. When I worked as a Relay Operator, the main things stressed were Confidentiality and Transparency. You are NEVER NEVER allowed to talk to either end. Your job is a telephone line. You can't answer questions, you can't do anything. If you get asked questions, you basically have to tell the person that you are a telephone line and don't know anything, and to ask the person who they are talking to. Or my favorite thing to do was just type the questions that they asked me to the TTY user.

      --
      //FIXME: Bad .sig
    2. Re:We've gotten this by fo0bar · · Score: 4, Informative
      I have several deaf friends who use both TTY relay services and the newer internet relay services. And because of this, admittedly I use the internet relay services occasionally. While this is technically an abuse of the system, as I myself am not deaf, it can be a real convieience. One thing to mention, if you do use these services, deaf or not, is to be POLITE. Remember, this is a throwback of the original TTY services, so there is a certain formality to the conversation. Use the proper etiquette, and be sure to thank the CA (communication assistant) at the end of the conversation. This must be an incredibly boring and tedious job, so at lease use a little manners when dealing with them.

      That being said, I would recommend at least listening to the first sentence of the caller before thinking about hanging up. Just yesterday I called a local computer shop to check the price of a power supply, and the conversation was quick and polite. (I doubt nigerian scammers would want to buy a $60 power supply and ask about the store hours). Here's approximately how a conversation goes: (other end begins with a colon)

      : dialing... 1... 2... answered... (male) thank you for calling computershop inc. how can i help you q ga
      hello. what is your lowest price on a 500 watt power supply q ga
      : let me check one moment (hold music) I have one for 59 90 ga
      thank you. and what time are you open until tonight q ga
      : 6 pm ga
      thanks a lot ga to sk
      : thank you (call ended)
      : ga or sk
      ca thank you sk
      : sksk

      A little terminology: "ga" means "go ahead", "q ga" is asking a question, "ga to sk" is signaling that you wish to end the conversation ("sk" meaning "stop keying"), "ga or sk" is essentially the CA asking "is there anything else I can do for you?", at which point I thank him/her and signal the end of the conversation. "sksk" is the final signal that the conversation is over.

    3. Re:We've gotten this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative
      as a CA you could be fired and perhaps jailed (I don't know the law) but in real life you almost certainly won't. I was a CA for a summer and yes they do stress confidentiality and transparency but in our office that rule was much more honored in the breach. Of the dozens of people working there only 2 were the hard-asses who would flat out refuse to relay anything that wasn't typed to them by the deaf person on the other and of the tty.

      Most hearing people who call the service make comments to the operator and most operators respond to them while remaining generally faithful to the fact that they're only supposed to be conduits. Because for a lot of people that's just human nature.

      Additionally, a lot of the deaf people have serious trouble with spelling and the operators have to puzzle out what they're trying to say. This involves some give-and-take with the hearing person on the phone which also often leads into those moments of operator to hearing person contact (it is VERY common for the hearing person to feel a little bad for the operator trying to make sense of badly mangled english and to make a to that effect meant only for the operator ... it might be horrible and illegal and jail-worthy in terms of the letter of the law, but that's not how it worked in every day practice when I was there)

      All that being said, everyone was faithful to the spirit of the endeavor, that of being a pass through. I'm not talking about long conversations between the operator and the hearing person, i'm talking about much smaller stuff.

  2. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 2, Informative

    50 state governments are in the USA, not to mention countless county and city governments,
    all of which supply aid in some form to those with special needs.

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  3. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Abm0raz · · Score: 2, Informative

    well, there's the federal, all 50 states, the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, American Samoa, several other protectorates. This doesn't count the several thousand county, township, borough, and city governments per state.

    -Ab

    --
    Nothing fails quite like prayer.
  4. Some Good Examples of Deaf Relay (TTY) Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can be found here:

    http://phonelosers.org/sound.html

    Specifcally this one which would probably get you a trip to camp X-ray today

    Phone_Losers_of_America_0118_Deaf_Relay_Commuter_A irline.mp3

  5. Re:What a horrible job. by JanneM · · Score: 3, Informative

    Um, yes. By law, and by the very job specification they had when applying, they do have to do this. It's not like it's a huge surprise, right: "Oh mai gahd! A human wants to talk about sex! With a member of the opposite gender!!"

    Assistants to disabled people have dealt with this for a long time; there is even accepted codes of conduct for various situations (basically, assistants should have a similar moral outlook as their bosses, or they will likely not be able to work together over time).

    --
    Trust the Computer. The Computer is your friend.
  6. Re:What a horrible job. by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 4, Informative

    I worked as a relay operator for about 9 months before I quit because it was ridiculous.

    Mind you, this wasn't normal tty relay. This was IP-Relay, which allows anyone with a computer to use it as a tty basically.

    Because I've signed NDA's and don't really want to break federal law, I can't go into detail about any calls, but I think I can safely say that what the article describes is pretty accurate.

    Also, As for sex lines, that's not too common with IP-Relay. What is common though is bored high school kids calling each other and being very creative with what they make you say/type.

    It's funny for a while, and not that bad of a job, but a lot of it is tedious, dull, and annoying (Touchtone menus...AARGH).

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
  7. Yes, Hang up! by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you don't want to take the call, the best thing you can do is hang up. It saves the operator (me at one time) a lot of time and frustration.

    If the person calls back 2 or 3 times, you might want to take the call, however. The scammers/people who aren't who they say they are won't have you do that. The real deaf people are used to that, so they have you call back a few times in hopes to get a different person who will take the call, or give you a chance to convince the person to talk.

    But if you still have no intention of taking the call, just hang up, saying as little as possible.

    It saves the operators a lot of trouble.

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
  8. Re:Simple Fix... by ShortSpecialBus · · Score: 2, Informative

    That doesnt work at all.

    What they use is the free internet relay service, which lets you use your computer as a TTY.

    www.ip-relay.com is one.

    ATT also has one, someone earlier posted the URL.

    --
    //FIXME: Bad .sig
  9. Re:TTY stands for by Neil+Blender · · Score: 2, Informative

    TTY = Teletypewriter

  10. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Informative

    Devil's Advocate here...

    Maybe we need to rethink the whole 'equal access' thing. Why jump through hoops to give the disabled to nearly every segment of society? So they can feel 'normal'? They aren't... that's part of the definition.

    I mean, what's the point? What is the justification here? I'm not asking this to make flames or troll here... I honestly want to know why this is considered to be a good and desirable thing?

    --
    I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
  11. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by abb3w · · Score: 5, Informative

    Free TTY services be allowed to issue usernames and passwords to their customers,

    Yes. Requiring some sort of proof that the service is needed as you suggest might also be desirable.

    keep text logs of the conversations,

    No.

    As I recall my sign language instructor explaining, the TTY Relay Service operator (and, I suppose, anything they might keep a hypothetical log with) is legally considered to be part of the telephone. They are NOT allowed to discuss anthing they hear; and any testimony they give about anything they have heard prior to a wiretap warrant being issued is legally inadmissable. You can be planning a murder, and the operator just has to relay the messages back and forth. It's a condition of legal privilege similar to those of spouses, doctors, lawyers, and the Secret Service.

    Allowing mandatory logging would effectively put a bug into the phone of every deaf person who has need of this service. Any regulation or legislation permitting this would be struck down in court as a violation of the equal protection and reasonable search clauses.

    As for the phone companies doing it themselves, they are under what is called "common carrier protection"-- they make no judgements over what to carry, they just send the voices back and forth, whether it's a call to mom or a death threat. Yes, harrassing calls are illegal, but the phone company only can take action AFTER the recipient complains. Logging, and revoking access based on use, would remove the Telco common carrier protection, and they REALLY don't want to do that. Not to mention the incidental that this might get them sued for civil rights violations under that pesky equal protection clause again.


    This report does lead me to wonder, however. I recall being informed by a professor who specializes in history of computing that the phone phreak community back in the 1970's to 1990s was had a very large blind community. While speculations on the cause of that are moot to the matter at hand, there might actually be a group of deaf/hard-of-hearing folk who are gathering around this new (and even less moral) illegal activity. If so, it would be depressing.

    Disclaimer: I am not a lawyer, I just argue with one.

    --
    //Information does not want to be free; it wants to breed.
  12. sites fighting the 419 scammers by chongo · · Score: 2, Informative
    Some people are fighting back against the 419 scammers. For general information about fighting 419 scam: Here are a few sites dedicated to exposing 419 scammers in an interesting and/or amusing way:
    --
    chongo (was here) /\oo/\
  13. Re:What a horrible job. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative
    No, the TTY operator must say EXACTLY what is written, in the first person.

    It's hard to get used to talking to a person whom is, in effect, acting.

  14. Re:No authentication leads to abuse... by awtbfb · · Score: 4, Informative

    That's 200000-700000 people using an older type of tty terminal.

    Since this is /. I'll chime in here with some clarifying information. TTYs are not what most /.ers would consider a tty. To communicate with the old, unfortunately almost standard, Baudot style TTY, you need to buy a special modem. Baudot is dog slow (45.45 Baud) and a fast typist can easily out-type the protocol. At the receiving end it is incredibly painful to wait for someone to get through a long sentence. Newer, proprietary, fast protocols (e.g., TurboCode) have removed this bottleneck, but computer compatibility still requires hardware.

    This hardware requirement why internet relays are so nice - you can just use a regular computer without messing with extra gear and you can call from just about anywhere. Furthermore, you can now access the internet relays via smartphones and PDAs, thus giving users a truly mobile option.

  15. Internal IP-Relay memo regarding certain threats: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Filename: troubleshooting_bombthreat.doc
    Design Date: 08/01/01
    Designer: Face

    CALL SET-UP

    Condition: Caller states there is a bomb

    Follow Center procedure to call supervisor
    Ask WHEN WILL BOMB EXPLODE Q GA
    Ask WHERE IS BOMB NOW QQ GA
    Ask WHAT DOES BOMB LOOK LIKE Q GA
    Ask WHAT KIND OF BOMB IS IT QQ GA
    Ask WHAT WILL CAUSE BOMB TO EXPLODE Q GA
    Ask DID YOU PLACE THE BOMB QQ GA
    Ask WHY Q GA
    Ask WHAT IS UR ADDRESS Q GA
    Ask WHAT IS UR NAME Q GA

    NOTE Tone of voice/background sounds/type of language used

    Allow Operations manager/supervisor to take over

    IF DURING A CALL, A CALLER STATES THERE IS A BOMB IN THE RELAY CENTER

    Relay call as usual

    Remember CONFIDENTIALITY IS A FEDERAL MANDATE!

    GETTING STARTED CALL PROCESSING BILLING OPTIONS TROUBLE SHOOTING ABBREVIATIONS BOMB THREAT

  16. here's why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    1.) I pay taxes, so since the telephone system/roads/etc are subsidized by my money, I should be able to use them. This is also why federal parks are free for the disabled; most paths are inaccessible, so it's like a rebate for the tax money we spend on it.

    2.) If I can work (because your tax $s help pay for a car I can drive, or because I can use a phone, or whatever), that's cheaper than putting me on welfare.

    3.) Because if you ignore the disabled (as society too often does) you lose out on, say, Stephen Hawking, or other "valuable" disabled folks.

    Without meaning to invoke Godwin's Law ... you're coming mighty close to the kind of ideas that Hitler and other eugenicists advocated, and still advocate. The Jews were not the only group he tried to murder.

  17. I, sirs, am a relay operator. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    So I have to put in my 250,000 lira. Mind you, this is never going to be noticed, due to my happy anonymity.

    BUT:

    I work for MCI Worldcom as a relay operator. More specifically, the California Relay Service (CRS). Our center handles calls from IP-RELAY.com (so do the Arizona Relay, the Tennessee Relay, and the Wisconsin Relay, if anyone cares). So all day, it's prank calls and Nigerian scammers. There are a few deaf people using the service, but not many. The signal-to-noise ratio is much too low, so to speak. I make a few measly dollars and hour to put up with this sort of shit. (But at least the health benefits are okay)

    It's always Ghanans and Nigerians. Every single fucking time. Not Koreans or Israelis or anyone else. Most are in Accra, Ghana.

    They buy very few computers, despite what the article says. Mostly, they call printing shops to order blank T-shirts. I'm not really very sure why printing, silkscreening, and embroidery shops would even sell blank white T-shirts in the first place, but they do. Did I mention it's always XXL and XXXL shirts? Don't let those Sally Struthers commercials fool you; people in Ghana are fucking CHUBBY.

    Today, it was wedding dresses. I'm curious why people don't get suspicious when someone wants to order 6 wedding gowns over the phone. Especially when they don't care what sizes or styles, just the price. Not extra large, though, oddly enough, so maybe they're not all as chubby as it seems.

    Some days it's shoes. Some days it's designer perfume. Or gold wristwatches. And some days it is in fact computers.

    And 99% of the time, the credit card is declined. And 90% of the time when that happens, the fucking moron at whichever shop I'm calling will actually ask the person if they have another card. They always have a spare, sometimes with a completely different name.

    Things to look for, if you're a store:

    - The scammer will always ask to have the shop run the credit card while they are on the line. This means, in stores with only one line, that the credit card machine will AUTOMATICALLY approve the card if it passes whatever obscure checksum process they go through. Nice trick.

    - The scammer will, if pressed for a phone number, say that it's not currently working. They don't claim to be deaf and have no phone, which is actually pretty common among the deaf. Instead, they give a phone number with too many digits to be a US number, or an email address. This email address will be composed of a foreign-sounding name, but it will NOT match the name the person gave on the card.

    - The total price will be just shy of $10,000 to avoid hitting the card's limit, OR it will be some multiple of that, and the scammer will have several cards.

    So, every now and then the scammer gets someone to ship him something, be it a half dozen BMW radiators or a $9000.00 Bernina commercial grade sewing machine. He gets his payoff. Congratulations, you stupid sons of bitches, you've successfully stolen things. What do you do with the money?

    You give it to terrorists, of course, so they can go to pilot school. Allah Akbar! (or whatever) Thank goodness for weak extradition treaties, otherwise this wouldn't be possible.

    So do the executives at MCI know about all of this? Of course. The government is giving them a whole fucking load of money every day to keep the relay centers open. Hope it's worth it, guys. As for me, I'm out of there as soon as I get my book written (never).

  18. a bit confused... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    How is using TTY any different than ordering over the phone? I could (and have) taken my mother's credit card and ordered things with her card. She has a female name ,I have a female voice. I could have been any female that stole the card. I dont see how ordering through TTY relay service allows for more scamming than ordering over the phone does?

    I think i'm missing something.. :-/

    Moreover, I'd like to add, as a child of 2 deaf parents, that is extremely frustrating and saddening when companies hang up on the relay service. Deaf people are PEOPLE. Would you hang up on a hearing person for trying to place an order? Extremely, extremely rude..

  19. Re:legality of aiding in illgeal things by sky_fire · · Score: 2, Informative

    I used to work for the Relay service and it was illegal to report ANYTHING short of a bomb threat on the facility you are currently working in. As far as the legality is concerned the relay agent is nothing more than a piece of the wire. They keep grief counselors on campus all the time because of some of the crap we had to relay.

    Even judges can't legally compell agents to do anything other than relay the conversation. I had one attempt to swear me in once before he would let me relay the call. The manager of my center had to quote to law to the judge before he would give up on insisting I had to be sworn in.
    (and since I wasn't actively relaying a conversation no this isn't confidential.)

    Of course this may have changed since the whole terrorism acts but I doubt it. The advocates are relatively powerful for keeping agents as nothing more than a piece of the wire.

    --
    -- Proud member of the Jello Sex Cult.