SCO's Biggest Investor Admits It Loves IP Lawsuits
Roblimo writes "A Baystar Capital spokesperson has finally admitted, directly and on the record to NewsForge reporter Chris Preimesberger, that they believe SCO's only viable asset is the potential proceeds of lawsuits against Linux users and vendors. 'We're looking for the best return we can, and we think the focus should be on IP licensing (and enforcement),' said BayStar spokesman Bob McGrath."
Hmmm, I should contact them. Maybe they are interested in my bridge selling business too ...
It's like watching Darth Vader turn evil and become the dark side as it reveals its true intentions. Soon they will become another geek household name to focus angst and hate against like MS and SCO.
> "We're looking for the best return we can, and we think the
> focus should be on IP licensing (and enforcement)"
This means in reality:
"We're patsies who believe any old crap people tell us. come to us, ask us to invest, make up a story and if it has big enough dollars at the end we'll give you heaps to get you started"
I'm contacting baystar with my idea of suing the president for presidency, because I SECRETLY won the last election, just nobody knows about it. I'm assured of victory. Trust me
Would I lie?
This is Slashdot, we don't care about such details.
My God! SCO's Biggest Investor Admits It Loves IP Lawsuits?! I am shocked! Shocked, I say!
Sincerely,
Pan Tarhei Hosé, PhD.
"Homo sum et cogito ergo odi profanum vulgus et libido."
I think they should move from SCO to the Red Cross. The Red Cross could use someone who could miraculously get blood out of a turnip.
<sig>no sig</sig>
...no one is going to sell my bridge!!! I've spent a good deal of time making a nice home under here. Grrr... ;P
Un-news
But if you buy a linux licence like EV1 did, you get a subpoena by IBM, and end up in a lawsuit.
MORAL: Stay away from the Litigous Bastards
It seems like anyone's not liking of criminal mismanagement and Pump-And-Dump rules would trump their like of IP lawsuits...
I wonder if they'll let Darl share cells with Martha Stewart?
I can count to 1023 on my hands. Ask me about #132.
Something tells me that if they oust Darl he'll.......
Sue.
I personally find their situation halarious (read: shit out of luck), and very fitting for companies wishing to profit from frivilous lawsuits.
Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley
It is my bridge and I am its troll you cannot live here without paying the toll.
[burn karma burn]
Pixels keep you awake!
Someone should spend the time to develop an RFC for a desperatly needed protocol: Lawsuit-over-IP
Baumi
They can't lose. If SCO prevails and Linux users have to pay, then they share in that income. If SCO is defeated, then they can sue Darl and company and share in the proceeds from that. Anyone would take that sort of deal. Anyone without a soul, that is.
I believe the IRS calls businesses like you describe "hobbies" as they have no intention of being profitable.