Slashdot Mirror


Sprint Cracks Down on TTY Relay Abuses

An anonymous reader writes "Sprint thinks it has found a way to keep West African scam artists from using Sprint's deaf-relay service to defraud people." Our previous two stories have background information.

192 comments

  1. Look at my posting history and explain -1 ? by monstroyer · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Can someone tell me what's up with these west african countries? Nigeria for example, it's all over the scam radar, their area code is synonymous with scam.

    How come we don't hear of scammers from Cuba, Russia, Afghanistan, Iraq, Korea, or any of america's historical and/or current enemies? Is it a media thing to drop west african country names when they refer to these kinds of scam?

    Does Nigeria really have a monopoly on scamming stupid americans? Are their organized crime mobs this pathetic that the best they can come up with is phone and email scams? Why can't they go into drug trade or union corruption like a *real* mafia would?

    1. Re:Look at my posting history and explain -1 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      To answer your question, in West Africa, westerners
      are seen as simply sheep that need to be fleeced.
      And they figure if someone is going to fleece you,
      it might as well be them. (Got that from the Passport
      to World Band Radio).


      Generally, you need to watch out big time when dealing
      with people from these countries, even if you're
      doing a legal transaction.

    2. Re:Look at my posting history and explain -1 ? by gmack · · Score: 1

      Speaking as someone with a few Nigerian friends..
      They do it from Nigeria because they can get away with it.

      If you look through your inbox you will notice that pretty much all of the 419 scams ask you to assist in something you know will be illegial(tax evasion, identity fraud, outright embezzelment) in return for a large share of the loot.

      When the Nigerian police get the call for help they simply regard it as one crook ripping off another and don't consider it worth their while.

      So it's all pretty much a low risk proposition for them.

      Why americans? Americans tend to have an international reputation for being easy marks when it comes to sales pitches.

    3. Re:Look at my posting history and explain -1 ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why americans? Americans tend to have an international reputation for being easy marks when it comes to sales pitches.
      This would suggest that Americans are somehow "trained" to be responsive to sales pitches. Doesn't help my cynicism any.
    4. Re:Look at my posting history and explain -1 ? by spyware+scams_suck · · Score: 1
      Can someone tell me what's up with these west african countries?

      I can't speak for Nigeria or any African countries, but i traveled in the philippines, a 3rd world country like Nigeria. There is no such thing as ethics in these countries unless it's to other "poor" people like themselves. You'll see very educated internet-savvy people there with no hope for a future and so crime is rampant. Scamming somebody out of their money is real low on the totem pole of crimes in 3rd world countries. You would be crazy walking down the street there wearing a gold watch or any kind of jewelry since they'll just cut off your arm, hand or whatever to steal them. the police and government officials (equivalent to the Mafia) are scam artists themselves and regularly force the population to bribe them in order to get routine things done (like a citizen just wanting to get a simple driver's license.) Why it happens particularly in Nigeria so frequently I don't know unless it's because their government is so corrupt they're also involved with the scam artists.

      --
      * weedshare.com 50% to artists, webjay.org iuma.com CDBaby.com Epitonic.com ampcast.com
  2. Problem looks very familiar by RobertB-DC · · Score: 5, Insightful

    But one former MCI relay operator said blocking internet addresses will only be a temporary obstacle for abusers of the Internet-relay system. That's because the scam artists can continuously find alternative Internet-protocol addresses...

    I think every popular web-based service dealt with this issue years ago, including Slashdot. I guess nobody involved in setting up the TTY relay services ever ran a message board?

    "Obviously it's had the effect of cutting down these calls, but they're going to find new hosts and call back anyway... It's always going to be a cat-and-mouse game."

    Or to put it in the Slash vernacular, a troll-and-moderator game.

    Grodevant would prefer a system in which legitimate users register in advance to gain access to the system.

    Again, Slashdot provides an example of a solution. Sometimes, you need to be anonymous. But creeps and crooks are among those who prefer anonymity. So you simply flag the calls: "You have a call from a registered TTY user" vs. "You have a call from an Anonymous Coward".

    I can see why the telcos didn't put these protections in place from the beginning, though... preying on the disabled is about as low as you can get. The companies simply didn't realize that these bastards have to look up to even see "as low as you can get".

    --
    Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
    1. Re:Problem looks very familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      They're not preying on the disabled. They're phoning anyone they like.

    2. Re:Problem looks very familiar by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I can see why the telcos didn't put these protections in place from the beginning, though...

      Remember those pesky laws that guarantee confidentiality of those whom are relegated to using relay services as their only means of communication with non-TTY enabled businesses. Those laws (of course) were written for TTY/vox relay and not Internet/vox relay. That's why the blocking has to be done PRIOR to 'connect'. They'll find open proxies and come from US based addresses soon enough (no disagreement with you there).

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    3. Re:Problem looks very familiar by PaleBoy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      They are preying on the disabled in that they've been using a system designed for disabled people to use, and have consequently damaged that system. Many companies will refuse orders from deaf people now because they've been burned before.

      --
      ------ What's sadder than realizing you've filtered out your own comments?
    4. Re:Problem looks very familiar by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >many companies will refuse orders from deaf people now

      And those companies will be violating federal law barring discrimination against the disabled. I'm sure some company will implement a policy barring orders from TTY relays, until the ACLU (or even the DOJ) lays the ADA smackdown on them.

      -TG

  3. Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by eaglebtc · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the article:

    ===
    Sprint spokesman Steve Lunceford, would not detail how Sprint is trying to block the calls other than to say the company is looking at problematic Internet-protocol addresses and finding ways to block them before calls go through to operators.

    So far, the effort appears successful. The volume of Internet-relay calls has returned to the level it was in early January, before massive abuse of the system began, Lunceford said.

    ===

    This is only a temporary fix. If they're blocking specific IP addresses, then the scammers will start using proxies. I suppose they could also start blocking anything from a proxy server, but there might be legitimate deaf people using Anonymizer or similar service that would no longer be able to get through.


    Is it possible to tell whether a particular HTTP request is coming from a proxy server, without knowing the IP address? Perhaps there is a descriptor in the packet somewhere that says it is going to be forwarded beyond the "apparent" destination?

    --
    Homestarrunner.net -- It's Dot Com!
    1. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by beebware · · Score: 4, Informative

      I know our web hosting business has had quite a bit of fraud the past few days which has resulted in me finding a big list of 1,700 anonymous/open proxies and then blacklisting them/their IP addresses. Ok - it won't block every single one, but hopefully it'll block the majority/well known ones.

    2. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I suppose they could also start blocking anything from a proxy server, but there might be legitimate deaf people using Anonymizer.

      Why is it legitimate for deaf people to use an anonymizer. When normally-abled people place a phone call, they have no expectation of remaining anonymous, why should deaf people?

    3. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by bev_tech_rob · · Score: 1

      ....."This is only a temporary fix. If they're blocking specific IP addresses, then the scammers will start using proxies. I suppose they could also start blocking anything from a proxy server, but there might be legitimate deaf people using Anonymizer or similar service that would no longer be able to get through."..... Or the scammers will use zombie machines like the spammers do mostly now.....

      --
      You're messin' with my Zen Thing, man.....
    4. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by xraylima · · Score: 1

      So is Sprint going to be able to block every IP of all the internet cafes out there? Whats going to happen when they get smart enough to take over someones computer with a trojan, and just access the TTY from it?

    5. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      Care to send me that list? Rajiv>K@Sparklit.com

    6. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by RajivSLK · · Score: 1

      That should be Rajiv<>K@Sparklit.com

    7. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because they are disabled, you insensitive clod!

    8. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      He tried to send it to you, but you're on his blacklist.

    9. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Maybe a deaf person wants to have phone sex. Maybe he wants to be an anonymous whistle blower but can't use just an ordinary pay phone on a street. Who knows. Just because people might not normally have a need to be anonymous doesn't mean that they always won't have a need.

    10. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by shepd · · Score: 1

      Here's a good list (I use it for idiotic sites like ShowTime that block Canadians):

      http://www.proxy4free.com/index.html

      And another one:

      http://www.multiproxy.org/

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    11. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really the only thing I can think of would be to somehow get the client to "betray" it's real originating IP - like embed a Java or JavaScript applet that attempts to connect using a different, not easily randomly proxied protocol like SSH running on a non-standard port. Somehow embed the session ID in the 2nd protocol, and match it up to the web session's ID. If the 2 IP's don't match and/or if the embedded IP shows up on the forbidden list, reject web session.

      Of course, this would also reject legitimate web proxies and may not work depending on firewall config for some people, but I guess you can't have everything :)

    12. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Shurhaian · · Score: 1

      If they're using TTY over IP, they should just get on IRC or something if they want "phone sex". Eliminate the middle man. Probably cheaper as well.

      But yes. There are times in which people expect to be anonymous when placing a phone call, and the deaf should be no exception.

      --
      NB: YMMV. IANAL. Take the above with a grain of salt.
    13. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Maybe a deaf person wants to have phone sex

      Dude, you have just given a whole new meaning to "three-way" in this circumstance.

    14. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      If you're inclined to do phone sex in plaintext, why not just hop onto IRC and do it with someone who is also inclined to do it in plaintext, rather than dealing with an intermediary? It's not like it's the least bit difficult to find someone to "hot chat", though they may be far from what they represent themselves to be. However, this is just as true of phone sex workers, who generally have only one common attribute (they're of the specified gender), and fake everything else as necessary. If you're already using a website to make the call, just launch a Java IRC client instead.

      As for anonymity, that went out the window for normal telephone service a long time ago. Sure you can block your Caller ID, but most people won't even take your call, assuming (reasonably) that it's a marketer or survey drone out to interrupt their dinner. Why can't the operator announce the IP address and the reverse lookup results at the beginning of the call, and let the recipient decide whether or not to handle that call? If scammers start using anonymizing proxies, they will quickly become as shunned as people with Caller ID blocked, and for the same reasons. If they don't, then just the fact that they are "calling" internationally will raise all sorts of alarm bells.

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    15. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Err, exactly this is why the OPL exists, albiet originally for IRC. There is also the CBL, which lists about a million open proxies and compromised machines.

      I suggest you check up on how a DNSBL works and find out about them. They publish a constantly updated list of such proxies and other things, mainly for filtering out spam but can be used to filter out anything you don't want from an open proxy using DNS protocols.

      As you can appriciate, having a constantly updated list is preferable to a static list of 1000.

      There's no reason why Sprint couldn't use the OPL, Sorbs, NJABL, CBL or any of the other open proxy DNSBL's out there.

    16. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Yes, but it's possible to write privacy protection laws that assure that the embarassing-but-legal phone sex call stays private, but the funny-smelling caller who insists $1,000,000 of product be shipped to Nigeria right away can be reported.

    17. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by phaze3000 · · Score: 1

      The SpamHaus xbl contains known open proxies (and open relays too, it's designed for spam blocking). You might want to look at blocking access to IPs on this list. It's updated very frequently, twice per hour I believe, and whilst it's obviously not going to catch everything it's certainly very useful.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    18. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by phaze3000 · · Score: 1
      Why can't the operator announce the IP address and the reverse lookup results at the beginning of the call, and let the recipient decide whether or not to handle that call?

      What's that you say? I have a call from 213.122.57.107, host213-122-57-107.in-addr.btopenworld.com? Hmm, let me think.. no, I don't think that's an open relay, I'll accept!

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    19. Re:Blocking IP addresses? Only a matter of time... by phorm · · Score: 1

      The deaf horndog will still need to pay for that service... being traced back to either his phone for billing or likely a credit card - no anonymity.

      The whistle-blower can still pass along juicy tidbits.... just have identification required for those making monentary transaction (again, CC = no anonymity).

  4. Nigerian fraud. by Lotharjade · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess we will just have the Nigerian fraud to keep us company. Glad that one will never go away. Ive almost come to enjoy seeing emails with it in the message. sigh...

    --
    Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
    1. Re:Nigerian fraud. by Lotharjade · · Score: 1

      But they are more reliable than friends. Always there to ask to move millions of dollars. sigh... Its rather comforting in a way... kind of like death and taxes.

      --
      Party at O'zorgnax's Pub! Buy me a Slurmtini aye?
  5. Reduction in fraudulent sales overseas, I hope. by The+I+Shing · · Score: 4, Funny

    I hope we'll be seeing a reduction in scenarios like the Midwestern couple who owns a jewelry store:

    Wife: Honey, the deaf Nigerian man is on the phone and he wants another $10,000 worth of raw diamonds. He wants to put the order on five different credit cards.

    Husband: Hot-diggidy! Another vacation in Malibu!

    --
    You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    1. Re:Reduction in fraudulent sales overseas, I hope. by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Wife: Honey, the deaf Nigerian man is on the phone and he wants another $10,000 worth of raw diamonds. He wants to put the order on five different credit cards.

      Husband: Hot-diggidy! Another vacation in Malibu!


      The store wouldn't react that way. If they ship diamonds to the fraudster, they're going to get burned because those stolen credit card transactions might get approved at first, but will be charged back eventually. If they smelt fraud, they'd hang up and refuse the order...

  6. Free Calls by p00p+at+instable.net · · Score: 1, Troll

    I hope this doesn't mean no more free calls ;)

  7. Uh yeah simple... by WwWonka · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sprint thinks it has found a way to keep West African scam artists from using Sprint's deaf-relay service to defraud people

    Uh yeah simple...

    You don't allow anyone from West Africa to purchase $30,000 or more worth of laptops from the US!

    Duh.

    1. Re:Uh yeah simple... by LostCluster · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, these hackers need only be sucessful once to net thousands in profits. They can be rejected 99.9% persent of the time, but that still nets them an average of hundreds of dollars per attempt.

      That's why spammers can keep going too. They only need a small fraction of payouts to win...

  8. Mod parent down - troll by foo12 · · Score: 3, Informative

    It's a cut-and-paste of a comment from a previous story

  9. Hmmm by sv25 · · Score: 0

    You're telling me these have been scams all along?! Oh boo...

  10. Of course... by Tuxedo+Jack · · Score: 4, Funny

    There's more fun things to do with a TTY operator than just 419 scams.

    Phone sex with a TTY operator relaying the action... ho, boy. I just hope that the operator in the middle's an uber-prim-and-proper woman who blushes like mad at the whole thing.

    --

    Striking fear in the authors of godawful fanfiction, I am here, appearing in darkness, Tuxedo Jack!
    1. Re:Of course... by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 1

      I think a bored and hormonal 21 year old would make the whole experience more enjoyable...would almost be like phone sex with TWO people at once

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    2. Re:Of course... by PalmerEldritch42 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, I have done this. A deaf acquaintance of mine used to call me all the time and we would try to see how far we could go before the operator would stop translating. Sometimes, we'd get someone who would enjoy it.. Sometimes, we'd get the uber-prim-and-proper type. Those were by far the most fun.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas une sig.

      :wq!

    3. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Phone sex with a TTY operator relaying the action..."

      That's the horniest thing I read all day... [goes off to *think*]

    4. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      My friends and I pranked a TTY operator one time. We used to go around looking for payphones that accepted incoming calls so we could prank people - "If you ever want to see your son again, put the money in the wastebasket behind you and walk away" - and we found a block of payphones that accepted incoming calls and had a TTY keyboard.

      I started a free TTY call to one of the other payphones, where my friend picked up, and we pretended to be a couple having a really bad fight. Towards then end, the operator gave up on keeping up with us swearing at each other. Whats funnier still, is that the operator seems to have thought it was completely real. That was one of the funniest things I've ever done.

    5. Re:Of course... by Obfuscant · · Score: 2, Interesting
      There's more fun things to do with a TTY operator than just 419 scams.

      I was amazed to hear the guy at the local computer store tell me that they had problems with this. They were getting calls from people trying to order laptops with bad checks. He said they now ask the operator what areacode the caller is in and refuse any call not from the local area. I remember him saying that New York state was a big source of problems.

      He also said that he expected this solution to be just a band-aid.

    6. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the least fun were the ones where you could hear the operator calling to the other operators, like, "Hey, it's those two geeks pretending to have phone sex again, come and listen, this is so funny!"

    7. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Actually, I have done this. A deaf acquaintance of mine used to call me all the time and we would try to see how far we could go before the operator would stop translating. Sometimes, we'd get someone who would enjoy it.. Sometimes, we'd get the uber-prim-and-proper type. Those were by far the most fun.

      You know what's even funnier? That your deaf friend was jerkin off the whole time you were typing. Ha ha. You're so gay.

    8. Re:Of course... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I was amazed to hear the guy at the local computer store tell me that they had problems with this. They were getting calls from people trying to order laptops with bad checks. He said they now ask the operator what areacode the caller is in and refuse any call not from the local area. I remember him saying that New York state was a big source of problems.

      He also said that he expected this solution to be just a band-aid.

      COUGH. BULLSHIT. COUGH. Oh excuse me!

      Just for your information, relay operators are not allowed to disclose calling from numbers. (I'm an operator.)

  11. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, it's something I typed after the article text. Is it a crime?

  12. Re:Already starting to go slowly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The "Props to Gay N*****" part probably... article texts should be posted as anonymous anyway.

  13. Re:Already starting to go slowly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The only purpose of the post was to get karma while using that sig. It's a troll.

  14. W00t by forkazoo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    These TTY scams take up a ton of time for the person who answers the phone. We get about ten TTY scam calls per week, and about 1 legit deaf call per month. That adds up to a lot of wasted time.

    1. Re:W00t by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Easy solution: If you receive a TTY call, the first thing you ask is what country they are calling from. If the answer is one you suspect indicates a scam, hang up. No more time wasted than from some guy calling to ask how late the store is open, and the legit calls still get through.

      Yeah, they can lie to keep you on the phone, but if they do and then try to order something you'll know from the shipping address, so it wouldn't do them much good.

  15. Here's an idea.... by phaetonic · · Score: 1

    Implement a one-time password that expires after X minutes of generating it.

    ie - deaf person contacts sprint operator, and proves he or she is deaf by faxing disability papers from the government. They now will have an account with Sprint's TTY service, and before using it, they simply call an 800 number and enter their social security number and PIN number they chose. This will generate a random password they can enter when making a TTY call that will expire 10 minutes after, or maybe after it is used once.

    i realize this information can be used by scammers who steal it in whatever way, but it should cut down on the total number of scammers, by quiet a bit too.

    1. Re:Here's an idea.... by chris_mahan · · Score: 2, Interesting

      And how do the deaf dial the 800 number without using tty? mmm?

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:Here's an idea.... by lish2 · · Score: 4, Informative

      You (and a lot of people) are missing a key fact: the relay service is ALSO legitimately used by hearing people to call deaf people. You can't just require everyone who uses the service to "prove you're deaf", or whatever.

    3. Re:Here's an idea.... by Galvatron · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I wasn't aware that deafness impaired pressing buttons on a keypad. How would they use TTY if they can't type?

      I suppose there's a risk that they wouldn't know if they'd dialed a wrong number, and therefore might start keying in their login/pin at an incorrect number. Scammers would likely start registering all of the one-off numbers around that 800 number. Plenty of phones these days do display the number as you dial it though, so that's not insurmountable.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    4. Re:Here's an idea.... by Lev13than · · Score: 2

      You (and a lot of people) are missing a key fact: the relay service is ALSO legitimately used by hearing people to call deaf people. You can't just require everyone who uses the service to "prove you're deaf", or whatever.

      It's easy - the operator just has to call them back. If they answer the phone, they aren't deaf.

      --
      When you have nothing left to burn you must set yourself on fire
    5. Re:Here's an idea.... by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Oh, they can dial allright. But how do they get the random password?

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    6. Re:Here's an idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Deaf people never live with hearing people?

    7. Re:Here's an idea.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Through the tty how else? Deaf people need to have the tty device! Duh.

      Otherwise they cant make ANY phone calls with or without Sprint or TTY operator help. Think about it. The Sprint operator types the conversation so that the deaf person can read what the other person is saying. The operator reads out what the deaf person types to the other party .. so this eliminates the need for everybody else to have TTY devices in order to speak to deaf people.

    8. Re:Here's an idea.... by Galvatron · · Score: 1
      Oh, I blipped over the one time password part. That's just stupid. They ought to just get a permanent password in the mail or something. And by calling that number they are automatically authorizing the receipt of TTY calls to their number, so non-deaf people can call them.

      Or maybe it still wouldn't work on a practical level, I'm really not that familiar with the situation. Still, it does seem like there ought to be a better solution than a blacklist.

      --
      "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than that of whether a submarine can swim" -EWD
    9. Re:Here's an idea.... by Ruzty · · Score: 1

      Ummm, the scam doesn't work from spoken to TTY. There is no reason for stopping the voice to TTY calls.

      -RUsty

      --
      The Master (Angelo Rossitto) in Mad Max Beyond Thunderdome, "Not shit, energy!"
    10. Re:Here's an idea.... by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 1

      "And how do the deaf dial the 800 number without using tty?"

      What use is a phone call, Mr Anderson...

    11. Re:Here's an idea.... by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      I know this is probably a troll, but phones for deaf people are equipped with non-auditory signaling systems-- flashing lights, for example. Radio DJs also use these sometimes, or at least I did when I worked as a DJ.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    12. Re:Here's an idea.... by Mal-2 · · Score: 1

      And that stops someone else in the house from answering the phone HOW?

      Mal-2

      --
      How is the Riemann zeta function like Trump rallies? Both have an endless number of trivial zeros.
    13. Re:Here's an idea.... by PeteEMT · · Score: 1

      Pure Genius, that

      Off to find my papers from the government

      PS The reason for using IP-Relay is it doesnt require a TTY. If you have a TTY, you'd likely use 711.

      --
      Pete
  16. Back in the day... by Xentax · · Score: 1

    ...this was the sort of thing that could provoke an international incident, even a war. Though, I'll concede Helen of Troy might have a bit more literary appeal than Joe Bloe Nigerian Scammer Dude.

    Now, we suck it up and try to live with it, or work around it.

    Has civilization taken a step forward, or a step backwards? Seriously.

    Xentax

    --
    You shouldn't verb words.
    1. Re:Back in the day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, maybe if there was oil in Nigeria-- oh, wait....

  17. Re:Sure this will stop West African scammers by richard_za · · Score: 3, Informative

    As a South African, let me assure you we are annoyed by West African/Nigerian just as much as anywhere in the world. Arguably Xenophobia (against Nigerians) is today a larger problem todya then racism was for us in the past.

  18. Big question, however.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is how it can be illegal to report illegal activity. I mean, if I use this service to, say, hire a killer to get rid of my annoying wife, then there's nothing they do about it?

    Sorry but if that isn't fucked up then I don't know what is.

    1. Re:Big question, however.... by Maestro4k · · Score: 1
      • ...is how it can be illegal to report illegal activity. I mean, if I use this service to, say, hire a killer to get rid of my annoying wife, then there's nothing they do about it?

        Sorry but if that isn't fucked up then I don't know what is.

      You seem to not realize what the service is intended for -- deaf Americans. To insure that deaf citizens are afforded the same privacy a non-deaf citizen would have on the phone the laws strictly forbid disclosing any information about the caller or call's contents. Yes that means someone could try to use it to setup a hit on their wife, but a non-deaf person can do the same thing on the phone (if they're dumb enough). If you were deaf you would want those protections so that personal information that comes up during a phone call isn't leaked to the world at large.

      When the laws were passed no one foresaw this kind of abuse ocurring and congress and the FCC/FTC (whichever overseas this) are being their normal slow selves about reacting.

  19. Parent is known troll, see comment. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Comment here.

  20. Short term solution by Mr_Silver · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I read that the main problem was that even when the operators knew it was a scam, their rules stated that they must finish the call.

    So for an effective short term solution change these rules so that any operator who believes that it's a scam can (after some procedures have been followed) terminate the call.

    I'm all for alternative solutions too, but this will make some headway into solving the issue. After the scammers know that you'll terminate the call as soon as it becomes evident then they'll look elsewhere.

    --
    Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
    1. Re:Short term solution by RobertB-DC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So for an effective short term solution change these rules so that any operator who believes that it's a scam can (after some procedures have been followed) terminate the call.

      Here on Slashdot, there's a strong "screw the rules" bent, as evidenced by the latest copy-protection crack.

      So I'm surprised nobody's suggested that the operators simply tell the obvious scammers to go take a flying leap. What's the scammer going to do, report them? "Hello, my name is, um, let's call me John, and the TTY operator won't let me purchase the diamonds I so desperately need to acquire. By the way, can I have your checking account number so I can transfer my dead uncle's estate to a Swiss account?"

      --
      Stressed? Me? Of course not. Stress is what a rubber band feels before it breaks, silly.
  21. Re:I was almost a victim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Not worth my karma points.... :)

    It took you an HOUR to figure this out and cut it "short"?

    It would have been MAYBE a 30 second phone call with me. MAYBE.

  22. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, lay off the caffeine. You're being hypersensitive and wasting too much time reading your past posts, hoping to whore some karma.

  23. So now we (the disabled) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    have to register with the government? I know of a government that tried that once ... Nazi Germany. (Godwin's Law, this tripe (dupe, but 3x) is over)

  24. MOD PARENT DOWN by Zak3056 · · Score: 1, Informative

    It should be noted that the above post is ripped from the previous article, and was originally posted by n1ywb. The original post can be read here.

    Parent is a karma whore.

    --
    What part of "shall not be infringed" is so hard to understand?
  25. Tough Issue by freejung · · Score: 1
    This is one of those difficult issues where it's going to be almost impossible to throw out the bathwater without throwing out some of the babies as well. What if someone in Nigeria actually wants to purchase $30,000 worth of laptops? It's not impossible.

    However, since use of this service is not a right, but a privilege, it seems fair to go ahead and throw out some of the babies, and let them get back in the bath on an individual basis. If you get blocked from using the service, there ought to be someone you can call to establish that you are using it for legitimate purposes. As long as they have that, seems to me they can implement whatever filters they see fit.

    1. Re:Tough Issue by chris_mahan · · Score: 1

      Ah, fax machine.
      Web site.
      If you are a deaf nigerian, the odds are you don't have 30 grand. But if you did, you'd be able to scribble something for your brother/dad/uncle/cousin/business partner to the effect of: can you call this guy and buy the machines?

      Again, it's like saying that a deaf american with 8 million dollars has to make a tty call to order 12 laptops from Dell. Yeah, I think he has an assistant.

      Anyway, I think that using a TTY without being disabled should carry a hefty sentence.

      --

      "Piter, too, is dead."

    2. Re:Tough Issue by bmetzler · · Score: 1
      What if someone in Nigeria actually wants to purchase $30,000 worth of laptops? It's not impossible.

      The TTY Relay service is legally only usuable in the US. So, even if a deaf Nigerian wanted to order $30,000 of computers, they couldn't use the TTY Relay service.

      -Brent
    3. Re:Tough Issue by L0stm4n · · Score: 0

      They have plenty of money in Nigeria! Havent you read the news?

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/2004/03/31/harvard_ pr of_scams/
      http://www.kpvi.com/index.cfm?page=nbch eadlines.cf m&ID=18172
      http://www.wral.com/money/2856534/deta il.html
      http://www.coshoctontribune.com/news/stor ies/20031 206/localnews/776413.html

      --
      superman runs linux
    4. Re:Tough Issue by freejung · · Score: 1
      You're absolutely right, of course, which is why I don't think implementing these filters is a problem. That this story was posted in YRO implies that there is some sort of question as to whether these filters are interfering with people's rights. While the Nigerian buying laptops is a clear case, there will always be borderline cases which are not so easy to distinguish, and of course the scammers will learn to mimic these cases. This is why it's an issue. Nonetheless, I think the filters are a good idea.

      This sort of fraud probably does carry a hefty sentence. The trick is catching them.

    5. Re:Tough Issue by freejung · · Score: 1

      Even poor countries still have rich people. That's the beauty of capitalism. But as I said before, I see no reason not to block these calls anyway.

    6. Re:Tough Issue by freejung · · Score: 1
      The TTY Relay service is legally only usuable in the US

      Ah, well, I didn't know that, sorry. I should have used a different example. There are still going to be some false-positive results from any filtering system you could implement. But in this case it's well worth it, since most of the filtered calls really will be scams.

    7. Re:Tough Issue by pjrc · · Score: 3, Informative
      What if someone in Nigeria actually wants to purchase $30,000 worth of laptops? It's not impossible.

      Unlikely as it is, they have to pay with their own money... not stolen credit cards!

      Our little site gets these Nigerians attempting to purchase with stolen credit cards. It's pretty easy to spot, as we've never has a legitimate order to Nigeria... but it's an annoyance.

      Eventually, I ended up logging their IP numbers and now I just drop any packet that appears to have originated in Nigeria. Worked pretty well so far... might have to imclude open proxies if they start using them. For anyone else faced with the same problem, here's a little list:

      # firewall out all Nigerian ISPs and Cybercafes
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 212.100.64.0/19 -j DROP # Cyberspace Limited (Nigerian internet cafe)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 195.166.224.0/19 -j DROP # Linkserve Nigeria Limited (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 216.139.176.112/29 -j DROP # Q-KON (South Africa)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 81.199.82.0/23 -j DROP # Communication Trends Nigeria Ltd. (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 81.199.84.0/22 -j DROP # Communication Trends Nigeria Ltd. (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 81.199.88.0/23 -j DROP # Communication Trends Nigeria Ltd. (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 81.199.90.0/24 -j DROP # Communication Trends Nigeria Ltd. (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 212.96.2.0/19 -j DROP # Communication Trends Nigeria Ltd. (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 217.117.8.0/18 -j DROP # Communication Trends Nigeria Ltd. (ISP)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 192.116.89.0/24 -j DROP # Sky2net (UK Satellite ISP serving Nigeria)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 192.116.91.0/24 -j DROP # Sky2net (UK Satellite ISP serving Nigeria)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 192.116.94.0/24 -j DROP # Sky2net (UK Satellite ISP serving Nigeria)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 192.116.98.0/23 -j DROP # Sky2net (UK Satellite ISP serving Nigeria)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 192.116.120.0/21 -j DROP # Sky2net (UK Satellite ISP serving Nigeria)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 192.116.128.0/23 -j DROP # Sky2net (UK Satellite ISP serving Nigeria)
      /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 62.128.175.10/23 -j DROP # Iway Africa (south africa and nigeria)
    8. Re:Tough Issue by pjrc · · Score: 1
      Even poor countries still have rich people. That's the beauty of capitalism.

      Yep, indeed. And these rich people often end up being in a coup, or are jailed/exiled in a power struggle, or just die of old age. Their wealth is almost always left laying around in a bank account or other financial institution, in a sort of financial limbo... leaving their heirs with no alternative but to seek out foreign assistance to seize those funds that are rightfully their inheiritance. These are good natured folks, of course, who are more than willing to share a generous portion of their newfound wealth with whomever is helpful enough to lend a hand completing such an ugent transaction.

      But before they die, be it natural causes or malicious power struggle, these rich people, who are forced to store their unusual wealth in such stealth accounts (that aren't readily accessible to their next of kin), suffer difficulty in actually spending their money. Since it's in these special holding accounts, to actually buy anything, they have to regularily rotate through lots of credit cards... often buying that "I don't care what it is as long as it's the top of the line" batch of laptops with several of these credit cards.

    9. Re:Tough Issue by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Anyway, I think that using a TTY without being disabled should carry a hefty sentence.

      TTYs are used for incoming as well as outgoing calls... Hearing people have many perfectly legitimate reasons to call using a TTY.

      That being said, from what I know, most hearing people who have to call more than once will just buy the TTY box and be done with it.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:Tough Issue by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 1

      > Even poor countries still have rich people. That's the beauty of capitalism.

      As a general rule (although with some exceptions), rich people in poor countries have very little to do with capitalism.

      Chris Mattern

    11. Re:Tough Issue by freejung · · Score: 1
      rich people in poor countries have very little to do with capitalism

      How can you be rich without having anything to do with capitalism? What non-capitalist bank are you going to put your money in? What non-capitalist investments are you going to invest in?

      I see what you mean, of course, which is that the fact that there are rich people in poor countries has little to do with the free market. But not all capitalism is free-market capitalism. Indeed, it could be argued that none of it is.

      Besides, many of the rich people in poor countries got rich by selling out their people and natural resources to multinational corporations. How could that be unrelated to capitalism?

    12. Re:Tough Issue by swmccracken · · Score: 1

      Check out http://www.blackholes.us/ and http://countries.nerd.dk/
      - country based DNSBL data.

      For example, http://www.blackholes.us/zones/country/nigeria.txt

  26. Why is anonymity an issue? by Henry+Stern · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Whenever I make a telephone call, for whatever purpose, it is associated with my telephone number. Thus, I am accountable for the use of my communications equipment.

    Why should it be different for people using TTY services? Provisions for anonymity only allow people to abuse the telephone system.

    1. Re:Why is anonymity an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Provisions for anonymity only allow people to abuse the telephone system."

      Same for the Internet, though its a hard sell to this crowd.

    2. Re:Why is anonymity an issue? by NinjaPablo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The problem is scammers are using websites which let you make TTY calls. The source number traces back to a legitimate website used by both the deaf and scammers. Blocking that number will stop the scammers, but also stop deaf people using the service.

      --
      SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
    3. Re:Why is anonymity an issue? by Tenebrious1 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Right, the parent is saying why allow such anonymous access? When a non-deaf person makes a phone call, their phone number, the number they called, the duration of the call, all that info is logged. Yet calls through TTY are not.

      TTY users should have privacy in their calls, but that does not mean they should have complete anonymity to make such calls. Requiring them to register and login to TTY relay websites isn't any different from the rest of us having to give all our details to the telco to get a phone line. There's privacy in the calls, but not the fact we're making a call and to whom the call is made.

      --
      -- If god wanted me to have a sig, he'd have given me a sense of humor.
    4. Re:Why is anonymity an issue? by NinjaPablo · · Score: 1

      I'm all for registering to make TTY calls via websites. While it might be a pain to setup initially, it's the only viable neutral solution (better than having TTY operators drop a call if they 'think' it's a scam)

      --
      SmashTech - No smashing of tech involved
    5. Re:Why is anonymity an issue? by Mr+Guy · · Score: 1

      Not to mention, doesn't some of that nasty nasty Patriot Act require tracability in the phone system?

      Operator: Hello, this is the righteous wrath of Red Front calling to order fertilizer.

    6. Re:Why is anonymity an issue? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Right, the parent is saying why allow such anonymous access? When a non-deaf person makes a phone call, their phone number, the number they called, the duration of the call, all that info is logged. Yet calls through TTY are not.


      TTY users should have privacy in their calls, but that does not mean they should have complete anonymity to make such calls. Requiring them to register and login to TTY relay websites isn't any different from the rest of us having to give all our details to the telco to get a phone line. There's privacy in the calls, but not the fact we're making a call and to whom the call is made.


      Normal TTY (Tele TYpewriter) calls are all billed, and logged, similar to any other call. For example a deaf person calls 711. Their number shows up just like any other using ANI.

      Problems occur now due to calls which originate from internet relay services.

      Internet relay should be illegal. It didn't exist a few years ago. It has only changed the world for the worse. Do away with it.

  27. Unfortunately.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    I hope we'll be seeing a reduction in scenarios like the Midwestern couple...

    Unfortunately, we will se NO reduction in lame jokes from Californicates and New Yuckers like you...

    1. Re:Unfortunately.... by The+I+Shing · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, we will se NO reduction in lame jokes from Californicates and New Yuckers like you...

      Would a donut make you feel better?

      --
      You are in error. No-one is screaming. Thank you for your cooperation.
    2. Re:Unfortunately.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Unfortunately, we will se NO reduction in lame jokes from Californicates and New Yuckers like you...

      Californicates is right. We do get plenty. Unlike you, Herb.

  28. What about deaf scam artists? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    AFTER ALL THIS MIGHT EXPLAIN
    WHY SOME SCAM ARTISTS LIKE
    TO SHOUT... :)

    Here is an honest scammer:

    DEAR MADAME

    I AM DEF AND DISABLED DUE TO
    A TERRIBLE TRAFFIC ACCIDENT
    THAT OCCURED ON JULY 21ST IN
    LAGOS CITY.

    MY LEGS WERE PULVERISED WHEN
    A BEER LORRY CAREENED OFF THE
    ROAD AND INTO MY STALL.

    I AM NOW REDUCED TO ENJOINING
    FOREIGNERS WITH CONSIDERABLY
    MORE WEALTH THAN MYSELF FOR
    CERTAIN FORMS OF ASSISTANCE.

    I DO NOT HAVE $50MM IN A BANK.
    I DO NOT EVEN HAVE AN ACCOUNT.
    BUT YOU ARE STILL WELCOME TO
    SEND ME SOME MONEY. US$2000
    WOULD BE WELCOME.

    NOTE I AM DIRECTING THIS THRU
    SPRINT BECAUSE I DID NOT GO
    SCHOOL AND CANNOT WRITE.

    THE OPERATOR HAS KINDLY PUT
    EVERYTHING INTO CAPITALS SO
    THAT YOU CAN HEAR ME BETTER.

    SIGNED
    OBAY D. OBASANJO

  29. Pranks as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Kids in my highschool used to have phone sex over that system.

  30. Just in case you have not heard about "419" by Curly-Locks · · Score: 4, Funny

    Wonderful scam on scammers: check this out - Ha ha ha ha . Some guy out there is a genius, funniest site in years.

  31. Re:Assassins needed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  32. Many people don't know about these scams by snoopyjd · · Score: 1

    I think that the scams are more effective if they come from a conutry that people don't automatically associate with crime/scams. Obviously if you are aware of these scams you will associate Nigeria with these, but you are not their targets. If Joe@AOL gets an email asking for money to be sent to Russia, he may think twice.

    --
    LIVE, Love, die
  33. Do like we do for other countries by Ra5pu7in · · Score: 2, Insightful

    REFUSE to accept credit card transactions for non-U.S. customers (primarily those in nations well-known as scamming bases). If they want $30,000 in laptops, they can handle the banking necessary to get a loan and make a wire transfer. Also, the symptoms of these scammers is that they seldom have clear descriptions of what they want. I don't know a single legitimate business that would fork out $30,000 for "whatever your most expensive laptop is".

    I don't handle the finance end of things, but I would suggest calling the bank and reporting such a suspicious transaction. The bank then calls the customer and verifies that the intended purchase is legitimate. This would hamper these guys in two ways: You wouldn't accept the card and now the legitimate card-holder knows the number is stolen.

    BTW -- what are credit card companies doing to deal with these scammers? How can that many stolen credit card numbers (with those kinds of balances) exist and not have MasterCard or Visa heavily on the tails of the perps?

    --
    I was taking one day at a time, but then several days got together and ambushed me. (from a Rhymes with Orange comic)
    1. Re:Do like we do for other countries by dgatwood · · Score: 1
      The Nigerian scammers would love to get your bank account number for a wire transfer. Then, they can rip you off royally. How do you think the whole 911 email scam thing works?

      No, the right answer is that all transactions from overseas must be paid with an international money order (postal or Western Union).

      Period. No exceptions.

      --

      Check out my sci-fi/humor trilogy at PatriotsBooks.

    2. Re:Do like we do for other countries by b0bby · · Score: 1

      Visa & MC don't really care - they just charge it back to the merchant.

    3. Re:Do like we do for other countries by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There is a huge amount of people in Europe who buy goods from Web-based stores in US. I know people who have a CC only for that purpose (especially now that the euro / dollar is so high). Make their life harder and they will stop buying (if the hassle is greater than the price difference they will buy there).

  34. Re:Already starting to go slowly by i_am_pi · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Uh no, a "-1, Troll" is definitely different than a "-1, Overrated".

    Overrated's don't go into metamod, overrated's are less stigmatizing than Trolls, Overrated is spelled differently, etc. I could go on for a few hours.

  35. Explain what?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
    D00d, 419 isn't an area code. It's the numbered section of Nigeria's penal code that makes the 'Nigerian scam' illegal. See here.

    Perhaps you have not gotten the 300+ Emails that I have gotten ... all people from or claiming to be from Nigeria. (There have been arrests for Nigerian scammers that are Europeans claiming to be from Nigeria). Thus 'Nigerian scam'.

    Perhaps you are relegated to posting at -1 because of the inflamatory way in which you ask questions. Claim that three-digit area-codes could apply to Africa *they don't*, and seem to imply that there is a conspiracy against Nigeria (which is the origination of the classic Nigerian scam). Read the FAQ I linked above and educate yourself.

  36. Re:Already starting to go slowly by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Also, if you want Karma Whore, check out Lost Cluster. Two out of his most recent 35 comments are below 1.

  37. hardware based challenge/response system by pneuma_66 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    In the past, anyone who needed to use the tty system had to own a piece of hardware to communicate to the relay, however, now with internet based relay calls, they only need to access a computer hooked up to the net.
    I think the requirement for specialized hardware is the key to ending the abuse of the system. My idea would be to use a device, where the relay gives you code, and then you input it into the device, and it spits out a response. This would still keep the calls anonymous, but, would add a level of security to stop the scammers.

  38. But now how will I know by foidulus · · Score: 1

    When my obscure relatives who were involved with shady deals die?

  39. Ummm... "internet protocol addresses?" 8) by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 0

    (From the article)
    ...the company is looking at problematic Internet-protocol addresses and finding ways to block them

    What's this new "Internet-protocol address," and how do I get one?!? ;)

    --
    Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
    1. Re:Ummm... "internet protocol addresses?" 8) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your computer is broadsating one. Danger!

    2. Re:Ummm... "internet protocol addresses?" 8) by MCZapf · · Score: 1

      Ummmmm, you don't know what an IP address is? You act as if the Arizona Daily Star used the term incorrectly, but they didn't.

    3. Re:Ummm... "internet protocol addresses?" 8) by torqer · · Score: 1

      Yes, it was actually refreshing to see a mainstream news article where technology wasn't misrepresented, and actually used the correct terminology.

    4. Re:Ummm... "internet protocol addresses?" 8) by Not_Wiggins · · Score: 1

      Sheesh... shoot for tongue-in-cheek...

      I think I need a Total Care Package to go with my Internet Protocol statement.

      (still too subtle? ;) )

      --
      Diplomacy is the art of saying, "Nice doggie!" until you can find a rock.
  40. Re:Sure this will stop West African scammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A person from Nigeria is Nigerian. Someone from Niger is Nigerien. Note that the first i is long, and the g is a j sound, like "general," not like "good," so it doesn't sound even remotely like "nigger."

  41. This is fine, but.... by dacarr · · Score: 1

    When is it that Sprint is going to educate and "empower" their phone operators to cut off the scandalous calls? This kind of action, I feel, would have a more daunting effect on 419 trollers.

    --
    This sig no verb.
    1. Re:This is fine, but.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read the earlier /. articles referenced in the topic.

      There's a federal law which requires them to conduct the call, no matter what the subject matter.

  42. Re:Sure this will stop West African scammers by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh absolutley. What with the blacks being virtual slaves to the charming, piggy-eyed Boers.

    Yep a few scam emails is far worse.

  43. Financial Survival of the Fittest by mabu · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I still don't understand why people fall for these scams. As far as I'm concerned, it's a litmus test for stupidity. Anyone foolish enough to ship $30k worth of equipment to a person they don't know in a foreign country without checking the integrity of the transaction deserves to lose their money and learn from the experience.

    One of the sites on my server is a classified ad site, and we've had several reports of people getting fleeced with the Nigerian forged-cashiers check overpayment scam. Again, why someone selling something would accept overpayment and then wire the difference back to the party or their agent is beyond stupidity. Ironically the best thing that could happen to these people is for them to get ripped off so some of that naivety will be summarily stripped from their barnacle-encrusted brains.

    I'm not saying the scammers should be allowed to operate, but any action taken by "authorities" should be considered more of a favor for stupid people, than a responsibility. No amount of enforcement or technology will ultimately keep a fool and his money from being separated.

    1. Re:Financial Survival of the Fittest by Saeed+al-Sahaf · · Score: 1
      Anyone foolish enough to ship $30k worth of equipment to a person they don't know in a foreign country without checking the integrity of the transaction deserves to lose their money and learn from the experience.

      This isn't the point. The point is that the TTY operators are not permitted to drop the calls. But I do wonder about XYZ Company that spends a HOUR (example given many times) with theses scammers before terminating the call. I mean, since when can it possibly take more than 10 minutes MAX determining that a sales call is bullshit, TTY or otherwise?

      --
      "Who are in control, they are not in control of anything - they don't even control themselves!" - Glen Beck
    2. Re:Financial Survival of the Fittest by arfuni · · Score: 1

      I don't feel that the idiots falling for fraud is the problem. It's the thousands of U.S. taxpayer dollars that flush down the drain each day paying for this crap.

  44. Why won't it be somewhat or even mostly effective? by swb · · Score: 1

    It strikes me that this is a crime that's decidedly low-tech, not high tech, and that the people behind it don't have the resources or skill to scan for open proxies or other methods of subterfuge to accomplish it.

    So why won't this be successful?

  45. Re:article text by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahhaaaa, you stupid Karma Whore, thought you would get points out of this????

  46. No, it is a right by Animats · · Score: 1
    since use of this service is not a right, but a privilege

    No, it is a right. It's required by the Americans with Disabilities Act. That's why turning it off for these scammers is so hard.

    1. Re:No, it is a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Heh, I always knew it was my right to phone in bomb threats to my school safely and anonymously via a deaf-person relay :) What a world we live in. (And yes, I have done this before).

    2. Re:No, it is a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's required by the Americans with Disabilities Act

      OK, good point. But it is not a universal right. It is only a right for deaf people. Would it not, then, be reasonable to require that people prove that the right applies to them before they can use the service, in the same way that you need a handicapped sticker to park in handicapped parking?

      Don't get me wrong, I'm all in favor of a broad interpretation of freedom of speech. But I think it's very important to make the (arbitrary) distinction between rights and privileges, and between universal rights and limited rights. Otherwise, you give fodder to those who would limit real, universal rights by giving them an excuse for saying, "we can't protect these rights, because doing so encourages crime."

    3. Re:No, it is a right by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
      Yes and No - basic communication is something that deaf people need to do regardless of origination. If a deaf person is at a public library terminal (not unlikely), how are they to provide thier 'credentials'? Userid/password over a library network is a bad thing, and many library terminals won't allow SSL connections because of security issues (defeats content filters).

      --
      Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    4. Re:No, it is a right by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is it a right conferred on Nigerians? After all, we're talking about the Americans with Disablities Act.

  47. Re:Sure this will stop West African scammers by richard_za · · Score: 1

    Today is Freedom Day (10 years of democracy) in South Africa, we inaugurated our third democratically elected president (Thabo Mbeki, this will be his second term - 2 terms is the maximum allowed by our constitution). The election was totally peaceful, and has been declared free and fair both by the Independant Electoral Commission and several international monitoring organisation. Note: No hanging chads! No offense: your a couple of years out of date. It is true that we achieved "regime change" by peaceful means, and thus Afrikaaners (also know as Boers about 100 years ago) are still in relatively good positions. Our economy is in much better position then ever before.

  48. Area code? by J'raxis · · Score: 1
    It's not an area code, it's the section of the legal code, as the page you linked to even points out:
    A Five Billion US$ (as of 1996, much more now) worldwide Scam which has run since the early 1980's under Successive Governments of Nigeria. It is also referred to as "Advance Fee Fraud", "419 Fraud" (Four-One-Nine) after the relevant section of the Criminal Code of Nigeria, and "The Nigerian Connection" (mostly in Europe). However, it is usually called plain old "419" even by the Nigerians themselves.
    (Emphasis added.)
  49. SpamAssassin by gral · · Score: 1

    :-) Works for my email. Why not for a TTY? Heck they are probably sending the same message they send to my inbox numerous times.

    Just send a message on occassion, with:

    Blocked 299413 Spam and Transfered 0

    That way people can "SEE" the difference.

    --
    Scott Carr
  50. Yeah, but it's pretty sick sometimes... by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    I think that one of the most disgusting images on the 'net can be found at that site.

    (note: Image is safe for work. Contains no nudity or profanity. It merely contains a phrase that is utterly revolting and could cause nausea, vomiting and a desire to dig your eyeballs from your skull with a spoon if you understand the reference made in it).

  51. Re:Sure this will stop West African scammers by Dimensio · · Score: 1

    Our economy is in much better position then ever before.

    Of course it is. You have all these rich businessmen dropping dead, leaving their money in your banks and not specifying any next of kin or leaving a will. I received two solicitations in a rwo for two different dead men's fortunes, each valued at $50,000,000!

    (note: I'm pretty sure that the scammer in question, who claimed to work in a bank in South Africa, is actually in Nigeria. I have reasons for suspecting this beyond "all of them are in Nigeria". I'm just being silly here)

  52. Subsidized service = automatic abuse by XavierItzmann · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The IP TTY relay service costs taxpayers $1.39 per minute.

    It is available for free to anyone, anywhere, 24x7.

    They will even make long distance calls on your behalf.

    Is anyone truly surprised that the system gets abused? Think about it. You, the taxpayer, are paying for scams, phone sex, student college jokes, and pizza. Is this how you want your tax dollars spent?

    --
    The next pasture is always greener
  53. Re:Fun with TTY --- worth +5 to me! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that laugh was worth +5 to me. gutless deaf lovers modded you down to -1 and YOU WERE ON TOPIC

  54. Bullshit... by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 1
    I would like to call bullshit on this one.

    While relay is anonymous (just as anonymous as a person-to-person call) - that means just like any other person to person call, the local police can still order a search warrant for your IP address. Then the Police will still knock on your door in short order, and you will be arrested (after your computer has been searched for evidence of tampering/open relay, etc).

    So, you can talk-the-talk, but if you did something like this and got away with it - you were going through at least one more layer of obfuscation. Otherwise, you probably aren't at your computer anymore to get this reply... (Hi officer - I tried to tell him he's being stupid).

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
  55. They have the *same* expectation of privacy... by zipwow · · Score: 1

    Disabled people using this system have (and should have) the same expectation of privacy that normally-abled people do.

    That is to say, unless a warrant has been already served for the purpose of tapping the line, no part of the call will be monitored or recorded. This is the expectation guaranteed by the law for everyone.

    This system for the deaf requires an actual *person* to be involved in the process, as well as special equipment. The law protects the deaf user, requiring that the assisting person conduct themselves in specific ways, specifically regarding their memory of the call as inadmissable in court, and unusable for any purpose. This assures the deaf user the same expectation of privacy as the hearing user.

    It's all about equality. Now, if you're willing to give up *your* expectation of privacy in order to fix this system, that's another discussion altogether.

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  56. Perhaps... by zipwow · · Score: 1

    Perhaps all the /.'ers realized that the first time some operator made a mistake, flagging a deaf school adminstrator buying laptops perpahs, that they'd be in violation of the federal law applying to these operators?

    Nah, that can't be it.

    -Zipwow

    --
    I don't know which is more depressing, that 2/3 didn't care enough to vote, or that 1/2 of those that did are crazy.
  57. I am hard of hearing, not deaf, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I am somewhat familiar with the deaf world (definitely moreso than hearing folks). What if you have 1 or 2 deaf friends? Is it worth it to spend 300-700 dollars (US) on a device that only can call them, and that may not work calling internationally, in Texas (some TTYs sold in Texas use "TurboCode", not Baudot), etc?

  58. I am a Sprint relay operator... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    To give you an idea of the intelligence level of the people who setup the www.sprintrelayonline.com service, let me describe their "temporary plan" to combat these bastards. Before outdial we were required to type (WHAT CITY AND COUNTRY R U CALLING FROM Q).

    The first internet call of the day I get, I type my little phrase and the person types back (after 1-2 mins of delay which is a clear sign they are far away) New York, USA. I outdial to some electronics store and the guy starts with his scam and then adds... and could you please give me the total including shipping to Nigeria. I fucking hung up. Yes, I hung up on the fucking electronics store, then hung up on the Goddamn bastard Nigerian. FCC can lick my balls. I was really fucking pissed off.

    I could get fired. I could also get thrown in jail for punching someone in the nose, but that wouldn't stop me if they started talking shit about my mom. You can only push people so far. I'm not even supposed to be talkign about this but I am so frustrated you can't imagine. Most deaf people don't even use Sprint Relay Online.

    It's a fact I can't remember the last time I took a call through Sprint Relay Online that wasn't fraud, or some idiot doing a prank call. They might as well just unplug that fucker.

  59. Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Radiohead, Peter Gabriel, local 974(Peoria, IL, USA) needs your help. You can never go home but you can have a good time where your at. We love ya. local 974

    Thanks Slashdot, we've always known you were goood people. I can see it. I can see IT.

    1. Re:Help by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh yeah, 974@kellymail.org

  60. Re:Sure this will stop West African scammers by Stregone · · Score: 1

    Well duh. Dunno why my brain didn't think of the obvious. Was pretty tired at the time, lol.

  61. Input from a TTY veteran... by arfuni · · Score: 3, Informative

    I worked for one of the internet relay companies for a year and a half. The nature of the service really prevents a lot of options that seem common sense to techies unfamiliar with the ADA (Americans with Disabilities Act). The internet service needs to emulate the anonymous call setup - no logins, IDs, etc., unless you want to profile yourself or use spell dialing. Registration isn't allowed. The services can (but often don't) block IP ranges, but I think we all know how easy that is to get around. Using a proxy with a dial up connection from Africa makes the service incredibly slow.. so they are prone to drop out, although a lot of fraud callers will keep up 10 conversations at one time. Their strategy is making hundreds of calls and eventually one gullible American is going to fall for the scam. One successful $5,000 fraud a week is a lot more than they could make there. These calls are NOT going to stop as long as there are internet relay services. The big relay companies make money of each call even if they're fradulent, so they have no incentive to block the service other than to stop the tide of bad press and quitting employees. It's a wonderful service for the deaf and speech disabled (TTY phone technology is a joke), but I think it's a matter of opinion as to whether or not it's worth the flood of American taxpayer dollars going down the drain to pay for fraud.

  62. Extremely minor nit by achurch · · Score: 1

    /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 212.96.2.0/19 -j DROP
    /usr/local/sbin/iptables -A INPUT -s 217.117.8.0/18 -j DROP

    These look like typos--the third octet will get zeroed out by the netmask. Are you sure you entered them correctly?

  63. Need to clear something up... by Perseid · · Score: 1

    There's a detail that some of you are missing, and, as a former operator, I feel I ought to clear it up:

    What's being discussed in these articles is NOT TTY relay. IP relay is a website that theoretically works just as if it were a TTY from the point of view of the consumer.

    This is good for the deaf people because they don't need a TTY every time they need to make a phone call. All they need is web access. This is bad, on the other hand, because Nigerians can use it, as well as 13 year olds who like to hear adults say 'penis'.

  64. Anonymity with Visa? by phorm · · Score: 1

    Hmmm, well first of all, if scammers are using Visas (stolen or not) to make purchases, then the assumption of anonymity of legit callers doing the same is a bit low.

    That is to say, if somebody calls to use the TTY service without using a Visa, whatever, anonymous. If somebody calls to make a Visa purchase... his/her ID is tied to the credit card.

    So the solution would really be to do some of the following:

    a) Assign special ID's/passwords for those legit callers using the system, but have them required only for monentary transactions (again, in which case the Credit Card is an identifier anyhow).

    b) As per with many online stores: only ship to the billing address(es) listed with the CC company.

  65. Two URLs by beetle496 · · Score: 1
    The link cited in the previous story lead points to whatever is the current City Paper feature. The better read is Out of Africa: International Scam Artists Steal Big Money Through a New Telephone Service for the Deaf -- and AT&T and the State of Maryland Benefit.

    And I can't believe no one has posted the link to the Internet Relay under discussion! Feel free to try it yourself...

    --
    I paid the going retail price for a Windows screen reader and got a free Unix computer!