Slashdot Mirror


La Pucelle Tactics Publisher Explains Alleged U.S. Censorship

Thanks to 1UP for its interview with La Pucelle: Tactics publisher Bill Swartz regarding alleged censorship to the PlayStation 2 SRPG from the developers of Disgaea, after an eToychest interview with the game's Japanese producer revealed: "We did take out a very few things we felt would cause problems in North America." Following sustained noises of discontent on the GameFAQs messageboards, it's explained: "Alloute wore cross earrings a few times and we took them out. We also removed a few other cross accessories and changed a handful of devices that looked like crosses (unless you looked carefully) to devices that looked a little less like crosses." Swartz laments: "There are well organized forces that work hard to punish software makers and sellers for what they consider religious transgressions", and clarifies the changes were "...not things that either carried meaning to the game's original audience or were in any way part of the substance of the game."

68 comments

  1. explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why would crosses be something to censor for America?

    1. Re:explain please by croddy · · Score: 1
      from the fine summary:

      Swartz laments: "There are well organized forces that work hard to punish software makers and sellers for what they consider religious transgressions"

    2. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      Yes, and why would it be a religious transgression?

    3. Re:explain please by 0x0d0a · · Score: 4, Informative

      Because people were wearing them decoratively in the game, and hard-core Christians can be incredibly mule-headed about forcing their views on other people when it comes to casual use of religious symbols. What if the bad guy likes to wear clothing with a cross on it, wears a full-black outfit (not uncommon for a Japanese game) and looks like a priest? C'mon, this is the nation that had Christian fundamentalists banning Harry Potter from school libraries because it contained "witchcraft".

      I wonder how feasible it would be to make this switchable. We currently have "Kid mode" switches in many games. I wonder how feasible it would be to have a "Christian mode" to disable the display of content that Christians might be offended by.

      <rant>Man, I wish that people could practice their religions in peace, and not force their religious views on other people (like stuff like this and banning of abortions).</rant>

    4. Re:explain please by NNKK · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As a Christian, I can tell you they can practice in peace, and many of us do; as do many Jews, Muslims, etc. In fact, important parts of my personal religious beliefs are that religion has no place in government, and that trying to force religion on others is inexcusable.

      I have no explanation for you about those that do try to force their beliefs on others. All I can say is please don't paint us all with the same brush.

      For what it's worth, aside from it not being my place to tell a company what it can or can't put in a game, I find the controversy generated by things like crosses in games to be fundamentally ridiculous. People are ascribing far too much importance to objects that lack inherent meaning. If I could say one thing to the people that get so worked up over it, I would ask them why they seem so much more concerned about earthly objects than their relationship with God.

    5. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thankyou!!! That was great to hear.

    6. Re:explain please by Mechanik · · Score: 4, Funny

      I wonder how feasible it would be to have a "Christian mode"

      I think we're safe. Most FPS games already have a God mode...

      /me ducks...

      Mechanik

    7. Re:explain please by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      it, wears a full-black outfit (not uncommon for a Japanese game) and looks like a priest

      In the last season of Buffy the Vampire Slayer, there was a caracter called The Priest who worshipped an entity called the First Evil, or something like it. He was dressed as a normal priest also. He was a pretty neat caracter if you ask me. Might be one of the best vilain the show ever carried. I've never heard anyone complain about his striking ressemblance to a real priest. But then, I don't live in the US and here in Quebec (Canada), people don't care much about religion. Well, people under 50 at least.

    8. Re:explain please by JFMulder · · Score: 1

      People are ascribing far too much importance to objects that lack inherent meaning
      While I'm not a hardcore Christian (sometimes not Christian at all), I don't think that saying that the symbol of the man who suffered a lot to wash us from our sins lacks an inherent meaning... It's THE most important symbol of the Christian religion, and is expected to be respected as much as a country flag, maybe even more. As are other religious symbols from other religions.

      But anyway, this whole thing is ridiculous. I like when games and movies uses religion to create a better setting for the story. As long as it's done in an artistic manner, I don't mind.

    9. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Basically anywhere south of Tennessee and east of the Mississippi River in the U.S., if you start Taking The Lord's Name (or symbols) In Vain, you're going to run into trouble with the fundamentalist Christian crowd. (Note the distinction between fundamentalist Christian and just plain ol' ordinary Christian.) IIRC, a Southern Baptist minister once called for a boycott on Mighty Mouse because he believed the super-powered cartoon character was doing cocaine. Not exactly the same thing, I know, but it shows the dedication of the fundies to protect you from what they believe is Immoral (like, say, everything except praying). I think this is who Swartz (and Mastiff Games by extension) is referring to and trying to appease.

      Personally, I don't really care, so long as the plot and basic tenets of the story remain intact.

      Oh, and I find it personally very ironic that people who misinterpret the Bible suddenly believe themselves capable of infallibly interpreting everything else. Call it flamebait, call it a troll, but it's just something to think about.

    10. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't think that saying that the symbol of the man who suffered a lot to wash us from our sins lacks an inherent meaning... It's THE most important symbol of the Christian religion, and is expected to be respected as much as a country flag, maybe even more.

      And why is the flag of a country to be respected?

      I'm being serious. The USA is the only country I can think of where the flag is considered sacred. I hear things about schoolchildren being forced to swear allegiance to this flag and, as a European, I'm just bewildered. Set fire to a Tricolore or a Union Jack and the French or British people will think, oh, he's making a political statement. Set fire to the Stars and Stripes and you'll have Americans frothing at the mouth and acting like you just admitted to forcing nuns to boil babies in their own urine.

      Flags aren't sacred - they're bits of cloth with pretty patterns on them. Crosses aren't sacred - they're just one pattern that commonly appears on flags. I'm a Christian too, but as far as I'm concerned when I see someone "desecrating" a cross it's just, well, someone pathetic doing something silly and pointless. It doesn't hurt God, why should it bother me?

    11. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      And that's where sunday school lead you astray. It's not that he died on the cross, it's that in doing so we are given permission to set down regret, free ourselves from self-doubt, and to dare to be better people. The fact that he died on the cross is an almost irrelevent quirk of geography. The theory goes that the story would have been the same, only the minor details would have been different no matter where Jesus was, or WHEN. The crucifix is no more the embodyment of Christianity no more than the Star Spangled Banner is the embodyment of the United States of America. It's the icon for the application if you will.

    12. Re:explain please by SansTinfoilHat · · Score: 1

      Did they think that if they changed the appearance of crosses that this Fantasy Strategy RPG from Japan would be popular with the religious right?

    13. Re:explain please by Stormwatch · · Score: 1

      Hell, just imagine someone showing up there with a Bad Religion t-shirt!

    14. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Oh BS. You'll get the same minority fired up in those countries as you get over here. I thought you continental jackasses had this completely objective unbiased news.... Same song different chior I guess.

      For your personal edification, moron, the proper way to handle a united states flag that has touched the ground is to burn it. This has been the case for a LONG time.

      The Pledge of Allegence is hardly about a flag.

      The correct and original version is:

      I pledge allegiance to my Flag,
      and to the Republic for which it stands:
      one Nation indivisible,
      With Liberty and Justice for all.

      It's about the unity of a people and a repbulic a few decades removed from one of the bloodiest conflicts of the modern era. We can argue over the utility of loyalty oaths by children, or the unseemlyness of Caesar taking up religion to distract people from social ills. But the message is a good one. I like it in latin better, e pluribus unum, and were I devil king of children I might start every school day *that* way. But it ain't about a flag.

      What's really funny is, it makes sense that you don't understand that. Not just that the American Civil war might seem esoteric to European children. But it's what makes America a superpower, and Europe not. When the shit hits the fan, we know which team we play for. When the shit isn't hitting the fan, we're in competition with each other. One continent's arrogance is another's introspection.

    15. Re:explain please by BCoates · · Score: 1

      (massive generalizations from minimal personal experience follows)

      From what I understand of European politics--which is not a terrible lot--Americans draw the border of acceptable politcal positions much more narrowly. Americans recognise burning the flag as a political statement, too, but it's part of a set of politics that are themselves sacred. Aside from cluless rebellious kids, people who don't want to be part of that are not welcome in our community.

      That's at least for Americans who burn the flag. When someone outside the US burns the flag, it's viewed less as "I strongly disagree with US policy", as "If I were brave and/or powerful enough, I would physically attack you".

    16. Re:explain please by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      I have no explanation for you about those that do try to force their beliefs on others. All I can say is please don't paint us all with the same brush.

      Maybe if you'd speak out against "the others" from time to time, instead of implicitly supporting them by silence, we might be less inclined to paint you with the same brush.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    17. Re:explain please by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Because people were wearing them [crosses and cross-like designs] decoratively in the game

      And this differs from the hardcore Bible-quoting, cross-bearing T-shirts with catchy "slogans" like "Pray Hard" and the ilk.... how, exactly?

      A lot of secular companies use cross designs in their stuff-- it's prominent in skater culture, if Tony Hawk Pro Skater's "create-a-skater" mode is to be believed-- so why aren't we seeing uproar there? Come to think of it, there's a move in THPS called the "Christ Air"-- not one word out of the fundamentalists.

      Man, I wish that people could practice their religions in peace, and not force their religious views on other people (like stuff like this and banning of abortions).

      Ditto, but like the other poster said, you probably mean that you wish fundamentalists could just let people do their own thing. The Muslims who are nice to everyone, the Christians who volunteer out of an internal moral sense and not just to say "Yay, we're Christian, worship with us or burn in hell!", and all the other devout religious folks who just go as they please without bothering anyone are cool by me.

      And all things considered we're a hell of a lot better off in dealing with religion in games than we used to be. We're no longer so repressed that we relegate organized religion to the ranks of NPCs who exist solely to help the player... the church (fictionalized or not) fits in a lot more prominently in games, RPGs especially.

      You know what I think would be an excellent RPG? Playing the role of a team of Vatican agents, investigating a series of alleged miracles; maybe it could be traced back to a fictional coverup or something. I haven't really fleshed out the idea too well just yet. But it'd be an interesting concept, I think.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    18. Re:explain please by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      You know what I think would be an excellent RPG? Playing the role of a team of Vatican agents, investigating a series of alleged miracles; maybe it could be traced back to a fictional coverup or something. I haven't really fleshed out the idea too well just yet. But it'd be an interesting concept, I think.

      I kinda do too, but...

      "Stigmata: The Movie: The Game" :-)

    19. Re:explain please by danila · · Score: 1

      It doesn't hurt God, why should it bother
      And certainly not as much as the original crusifiction did. Seriously, you are absolutely right here. Stars, stripes and crosses are just geometric primitives. To believe that they have any value or meaning besides what we personally ascribe to them is foolish.

      Just like words, geometric (and other) symbols can be useful in a limited context, such as in diplomacy, in military service, etc. Hence special rules for setting the flags on the table when you have negotiations, for respecting the flag of the military unit, etc.

      But overall, let's not overstate the importance of these symbols, use them as symbols when we want to communicate our ideas to others, and let them be simple geometric shapes otherwise.

      --
      Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
    20. Re:explain please by shadowcabbit · · Score: 1

      Weird. That's the second time today, in two completely unrelated conversations, that Stigmata has come up. I may just have to see it, now.

      --
      "Why Subscribe?" Good question...
    21. Re:explain please by Brother+Grifter · · Score: 1

      Ask your pastor or local preacher if he feels the same way as you do. If he doesn't, than think twice about paying your tithe (if you pay a tithe). Funding these fundamentalist preachers need to stop.

      When a nutty Christian preacher starts running his mouth about issues protected by the constitution, he needs to get a nudge to clam it up.

      You don't want a few "bad apples" to create a controversial face to Christianity, nor do you want to support those individuals when their talking about usurping the idea of separation of church and state with their remarks about video games, censorship, etc...

    22. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You can't pin it all on the fundies, although I wouldn't expect anything less from Slashdot.

      At stake is the "psychological well-being" of non-Christian or non-religious kids who are being "forced" to look at crosses while playing their wittle video games. Innocent tikes are at risk because of exposure like this, you know.

      In fact, I'd go out on a limb and say that it's not a purely Christian thing at all. Remember the recent problems that Sikh groups had with that one shitty game whose name I can't remember, where bad guys were running around in turbans? Other examples include the American removal of a seemingly benign track of Muslim-sounding chants from the final revision of Zelda: Ocarina of Time for the N64 and GameCube, and the American removal of Stars of David from the floors in Final Fantasy. It's an across-the-board thing for the U.S., not just "those Southern hick idiots fucking things up for Slashdotters again."

    23. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      He just did. Or did you not read that part?

    24. Re:explain please by NNKK · · Score: 2, Interesting

      As the anonymous poster noted, I just did. And I do so any time it comes up, though you'd have no way of knowing that.

      Admittedly it doesn't seem like you often see those that share my beliefs speaking out. Part of the problem is that they often don't see what is happening. Another part is external pressure. Yet another is that a lot are better people than I am and spend much of their time helping others. The biggest problem though, is that we don't really have a voice.

      Fundamentalists are loud -- very loud. And they get propped up by other fundamentalists in influential places. Moderate and liberal voices get drowned out by those screaming about how evil everyone else is.

      Do you know who I am? No, because I'm basically nobody. I'm an 18-year-old primary-school-dropout sysadmin that writes Perl and runs an extremely tiny, 4-day-old web hosting company in southeastern Washington State (seventh level of hell, if you're wondering; I want to be back west of the Cascades). My biggest claim to fame is having written an automation system for webcomics in use by maybe half a dozen sites, none of them wildly popular.

      You don't hear me because I'm not somebody one listens to. I don't grab media attention when I rant about Christian fundamentalists or come out in support of gay marriage. I have no influence.

      You hear me now only because you looked in the right place at the right time. I'm afraid I don't know how to fix that.

    25. Re:explain please by kenthorvath · · Score: 1
      You hear me now only because you looked in the right place at the right time. I'm afraid I don't know how to fix that.

      It's hard to speak to those who are unwilling to listen and it is even harder to change the minds of those who have not opened them. People with closed minds usually are not rational, and their belief structure is generally formed either early in life vis-a-vis dogmatic inheritance or by popular opinion because they are too weak to think for themselves. If you want more people to hear what you have to say (and are willing to face the possibility that you are wrong in your views, in return) then start with those to whom you are closest: friends, family, etc... Change their minds, and the cycle will continue and spread like a virus of rationality. One doesn't need to be a political activist with a cause to may a change in the world.

    26. Re:explain please by NNKK · · Score: 1

      I don't formally belong to any church, nor do I attend regularly, but the one I grew up in and retain some ties to (Seventh-Day Adventist) has a lot to do with my seemingly liberal beliefs. Any pastor in a major congregation that preached censorship and legislation of religion and morality would likely find himself looking for a new job.

      Unfortunately, with a membership of something like 13 million world-wide (and I do mean world-wide, a ton of those people are *outside* the United States), the SDA church is quite small, and in the US is mostly known for its health care and to a lesser extent education systems, which make great ambassadors, but the people there have better things to do with their time than issue strongly-worded public statements, especially since they're already concerned about the mixing of politics and religion. Also, people often don't realize some places are SDA-operated unless they've actually been there for any amount of time (Loma Linda, for example).

    27. Re:explain please by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      As the anonymous poster noted, I just did.

      When I said "you" , I meant the plural as in "all y'all".
      As Barry Goldwater once remarked, "A good Christian would punch Jerry Falwell in the mouth".

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    28. Re:explain please by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      No kidding. The fish logo thing supposedly has much more relevance, yet it's used all over the place and no one seems to care.

      --
      True story.
    29. Re:explain please by Deraj+DeZine · · Score: 1

      Either that or your friends will begin to avoid you. I know if one of my friends started preaching to me (whether it be religion, politics, or open source software, or some combination of the three), I'd start being "busy" whenever I saw them and generally just try and get the point across that I disagree with them. Yes, I'm assuming I would disagree with them, but I think that's a safe assumption given that anyone who feels strongly enough about a religion or political party to push force their beliefs on people that they supposedly like probably does not have an open mind.

      --
      True story.
    30. Re:explain please by BCoates · · Score: 1
      When a nutty Christian preacher starts running his mouth about issues protected by the constitution, he needs to get a nudge to clam it up.
      No irony here, ladies and gentlemen, move along.
    31. Re:explain please by dfghjk · · Score: 1

      There's a big difference between "respected" and "sacred". School kids aren't forced to swear allegiance, either. They are allowed to opt out (at least theoretically). I would say that plenty of other countries have a greater sense of nationalism than the US does.

      Flags are respected as symbols of nations out of convention. Although it is arbitrary there is nothing wrong with it. Personally I feel that respect is due to any nation's flag, not just my own.

    32. Re:explain please by kenthorvath · · Score: 1

      There is a big difference between forcing beliefs on someone and engaging in an intellectual conversation between a willing party. If you are making your friends uncomfortable by discussing something, then their minds are not really open to the topic to begin with. And preaching is another matter entirely. I have never met a priest or preacher that was willing to face the possibility that he was wrong about his beliefs - blind faith is the archnemesis of reason and the bane of intellectual discourse.

    33. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In that case, you'll respect Osama for being brave enough to physically attack you.

    34. Re:explain please by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's still only a symbol. Faith is inside you, and that's the meaningful part. IMHO, anyway.

  2. Might Explain... by osullish · · Score: 4, Funny

    The delay with Duke Nukem, They're tidying up the level with the Stripper nuns in the mosque....

    --
    It's hard enough to remember my opinions, never mind the reasons for them..
  3. It's hard to say what the problem really is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Given the games visibility it's hard to imagine a church group on a letter writing campaign this early in the process. There's the soccer mom factor where in people with far too much time on their hands and not enough sense to use it well are asked their opinions on products which will be used by other demographics. And of course the headless suit factor which is practically the definition of following and never catching the wave.

    I'd bet the latter. More likely they ran into some Walmart-esque troubles. (Hiring illegals because they're cheap and keep their traps shut is a Christian thing to do. Cosmo is communist, but products made exclusively by prison labor in China are all-American.)

    It might be something for Sega or Nintendo's american brances to do, help other games cross the pacific. They could have either another subsidiary kind of like their own off brand Disney vs Buena Vista, or just do it on the downlow like how boeing finances used Airbus planes.

  4. It's like flag burning... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    or all kinds of things.

    They can't get past the 6th grade tit-for-tat of it. Sure burning the flag can be a powerful insult. But it can also be a gesture of honor as when a flag is soiled (or even just touches the ground) and is burned. (Which can also have tragic consequences). Someone wants them to feel bad, so they do. Because for whatever reason it's not possible to make the other people offending them feel bad, they want to enjoin the general behavior that made them feel bad. What that completely ignores is they had a choice to feel bad or not. Like your faith, if I may presume, the wellspring they're searching the outside world for lays within. Lacking the feeling, they need something to focus on or identify with. To have that challenged probably feels like an unwelcome intrusion in to what is ones personal space.

    Look at the extent this goes to in the muslim third world. Women wearing heavy opaque sacks in 100 degree heat, enduring mutilation, and being butchered when a family member rapes them to preserve some sense of honor. And we've our less graphic pecidillos too.

  5. Xenosaga by jetfuel · · Score: 3, Interesting

    There was something a little more drastic done in Xenosaga.
    **SPOILERS**
    There's a scene in which the main antagonist nano-liquifies his arm and jams it into the abdomen of a young-girl-type character. In the original Japanese version it's pretty disturbing and pretty obviously suggestive. The US version replaced this scene was changed to him simply "absorbing" data from her brain through the air. It's been said that some of the creators actually prefer the gentler version.
    Two other scenes were edited similarly. There is a full description with screenshots at Zenosaga.com.

    1. Re:Xenosaga by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

      Xenosaga (and gears) is also steeped in judeo christian mythology/legend/scripture. The thing is it gets by all the crazies who would complain about it because they aren't educated enough in their own religion to even catch the references.

      This is a generalization, I know, but it's also generally true!

    2. Re:Xenosaga by Genom · · Score: 2, Interesting

      IIRC there was a similar controversy over Xenogears shortly after release in Japan, regarding the possibility of a US release. I remember reading articles saying "It'll never fly in the US..." and "The christian groups won't stand for it..."

      You know what? Square released it over here anyway (thanks Square!), and there wasn't a lick of uproar in the mainstream media that I can remember. Then again, Xenogears was pretty much a niche game, as opposed to FF games that get tons of publicity.

    3. Re:Xenosaga by BCoates · · Score: 1

      I've never played it, but I know a Conservative WASP who loves that series of games.

  6. God Damned Christians! by Oz0ne · · Score: 1

    ... hehe I guess that's ironic.

  7. Paranoia by BCoates · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It strikes me that self-imposed preemptive censorship (the MPAA's rating system, ESRB, the Hays Commission, the Comics Code Authority, Professor Felten, Cable TV standards & practices...) in America is reliably more draconian than any successful government censorship regime.

    Perhaps the mainstream media outlets need to take a hint from the porn industry, tell the govenrment to screw off, and accept the occaisional raid+fine (if it even goes that far) as an advertising expense? "You heard about it on 20/20, now play it! the disgusting new action game BANNED in MICHIGAN!"

  8. Appalling by Calydor · · Score: 1
    It is when software makers have to take these things into account that they get scared of innovation in the games as well, and we end up with a stagnating genre.

    Also, I'm willing to bet my right arm that it's the censored version that'll reach Europe, too. Besides Europeans being much, much less fanatical about such - honestly - pointless things.

    --
    -=This sig has nothing to do with my comment. Move along now=-
  9. Evangelion by bludstone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While its not a videogame, I sometimes wonder why I dont see "neon genesis evangelion" attacked for its heavy use of christian religious symbols. (not that they mean anything.)

    Maybe Its just under their radar.

    --

    no .sig
    1. Re:Evangelion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe it just sucked.

    2. Re:Evangelion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You must be a Dragonball fanboy...

    3. Re:Evangelion by DeadScreenSky · · Score: 1

      It really is just under their radar in America (which is where this kind of thing matters to people). When a couple of episodes were shown on Cartoon Network, the religious iconography was completely removed, AFAIK. I would be curious to know how people have responded to it being broadcast in countries like Australia, and whether it was censored for religious reasons as well.

      (I believe Evangelion was shown uncut on public television in San Francisco or LA, but those aren't the kinds of places that complain about that stuff. :D )

      It will be interesting to see if the eventual live-action version features the same kind of imagery. The cross-shaped explosions, etc. all lent Eva a certain charm that would be really missed if they play it safe. Even just having the invaders called Angels and be minions of an, err, enemy called Adam could piss off some people.

      --
      There is no excellent beauty that hath not some strangeness in the proportion. -- Francis Bacon
  10. Crossed Out by robbway · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as I hate censorship, this is a minor change to the game. What's really odd is that they removed the crosses from the church scene! It appears the use of Christian symbology is taken out of context for most Japanese and therefore they blanket-remove them instead of understanding where they're gratuitous. It's also a shame they're removing things that look like crosses, because like Freudian Psychology (mostly bunk), you see certain common shapes everywhere because they're practical. Stop at the next intersection and ponder this.

  11. Oh no by Hard_Code · · Score: 0, Troll

    The Matrix used religious iconography!
    BURN IT BURN IT

    We must not challenge people's assumptions about symbols! Think of the children!

    --

    It's 10 PM. Do you know if you're un-American?
  12. Wondering by sithkhan · · Score: 1

    This type of incorrect usage of the word censorship bothers me. The GOVERNMENT censors people. Individuals and corporations, by definition, cannot bring censorship onto something. If a company changes its product in response to critisicm by a potential market, that's called refining the product. If you want to state that a comapny has the right to manufacture its product the way it sees fit, you are 100% correct (excepting government regualtions and rules). But, if the changes would increase their market share, then the company is more likely to do it. This story is only getting any traction on /. because "There are well organized forces that work hard to punish software makers and sellers for what they consider religious transgressions".

    --

    is it that bad seein a hot chick again? if i see a hot chick walkin down the hall i dont say "repost"
    1. Re:Wondering by MMaestro · · Score: 1
      The GOVERNMENT censors people. Individuals and corporations, by definition, cannot bring censorship onto something.

      True, but it is the voice of the people which controls the government (at least thats the way its supposed to work) and the government in turn censors things as the public wants it.

      Yell, scream, and bitch about something loud enough with enough people and you can get anything censored. Ban smoking in public areas. Raise/Lower the legal drinking/smoking age. Raise/Lower the speed limit on the certain street. Ban a book in schools because it uses the word 'nigger' (Uncle Tom's Cabin). Etc etc.

    2. Re:Wondering by sfjoe · · Score: 1

      Individuals and corporations, by definition, cannot bring censorship onto something.

      That would be true except that, in the USA, the government is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the corporations.

      --
      It's simple: I demand prosecution for torture.
    3. Re:Wondering by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Too glib a distinction, at a certain point. I agree in general that this is self-censorship based on a vocal political bloc in US society punishing its enemies in the marketplace and PR spheres.

      But individuals and corporations can effectively censor to the extent that they use what power they have as individuals and organizations to restrict the discourse of other around them. If I as an individual threaten to shoot you if you say something, I've censored you. If I as a corporation threated to begin a massive lawsuit if you publish an article critical of my product, and you can't afford the cost to you and your family of defending it, then I've effectively censored you (viz. SLAPP suits).

      The boundary between "government" and "not government" is not anywhere as straightforward or clear as your definition seems to suggest, either.

    4. Re:Wondering by Doctor_Jest · · Score: 1

      Your example is considerably more serious than removal of crosses from a game (pre-emptively). The former is of course protected by the First Amendment, as is the latter, but no one told the latter to do anything. If they had left them in, and not mentioned it, do you think anyone who was offended would notice? I certainly feel the corporate censorship (SLAPP suits and the like) much more grievous than someone not seeing a cross in a video game. That's Japan editorializing what bothers Americans.

      There's no outcry for removal of crosses from games that I have ever heard. This sort of thing just smells like cultural ignorance on the part of Japanese. Sure there might be a group somewhere... but sheesh, there's a group for everything. We've got fringe groups burning SUVs,vandalizing them in the name of the "earth" or something. There's always SOMETHING that'll offend someone. :)

      The Japanese just don't know what is a hot-button enough item to remove from their games. :)

      --
      It's the Stay-Puft Marshmallow Man.
  13. Anime Star of David by spitzak · · Score: 1

    I have noticed several times in Anime (especially older Anime from the 80's) that it appears the makers have confused the Star of David with the Pentagram, and had characters drawing it on the floor with candles to summon demons, or wearing pendants with it that have paranormal powers. Did anybody ever comment on this, did it raise any kind of controversy, or what?

    1. Re:Anime Star of David by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The "Star of David" is used as a mystic symbol in the occult. It is a symbol of power, and commonly used in Kabalah.

  14. Well. by SuiteSisterMary · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There's censorship, and there's localization. Don't confuse the two.

    For example, where an American would say 'can you throw this in, to sweeten the deal,' the equivalent Japanese phrase would be 'can you throw this in, to add a little sexy blush to the deal.'

    The first phrase would be a perfectly good translation of the second phrase, but not a transliteration. So which is the more appropriate? Depends on what you're going for.

    Well, Christian symbology means more to the average North American than it does to the average Japanese, even the Christian ones. Actually, they tend to be pretty pragmatic; you see your Christian priest for this, your Shinto priest for that, and your local Budhist monk for the other.

    --
    Vintage computer games and RPG books available. Email me if you're interested.
  15. i almost expected by WormholeFiend · · Score: 2, Interesting

    i almost expected that the main problems would be with the name of the title...

    La Pucelle means "the [female] virgin".

    I didnt RTFA, but I guess this is a game about Joan of Arc, aka La Pucelle d'Orleans?

  16. Christian symbols in Japanese games by danila · · Score: 1

    I can attest that Japanese seriously don't give much shit about Christian symbols. It's just that Christian girls are another stereotype you can use in games - you have tomboy girls, childhood friends, smart chicks with glasses, older (20+) women, cute 15 y.o. girls, etc. :) I remember at least two hentai games I personally played that featured Christian girls (with very noticeable Christian symbols). One of them was even a nun that had sex with the main character in the church. :) And since I played the American version, apparently the publishers didn't see it fit to censor it (though they make sure that all girls are 18+, even if it means replacing "14 y.o." with "18 y.o." in the text without changing the pictures or the story :] ).

    Just my two yen.

    --
    Future Wiki -- If you don't think about the future, you cannot have one.
  17. MOD PARENT UP by Rayonic · · Score: 1

    Excellent summation of the issue.

  18. Nintendo Censorship by RotJ · · Score: 3, Informative
    Nintendo's been known to remove crosses from a game no matter what the context. I'm surprised they let games use the letter "t". For example, in Earthbound they removed a red cross from a hospital. Actually, Mother 2/Earthbound went through a lot of changes from Japan to North America. Here are some other instances of Nintendo's game changes and censorship. And This page (Google cache) shows Nintendo of America's old video game content guidelines, along with examples of games that were changed to meet each of those guidelines.

    I didn't know Sony Playstation had these problems, considering they released Xenogears, which depicted the crucifixion of furry critters.

    1. Re:Nintendo Censorship by jonwil · · Score: 1

      Another example of Nintendo censorship is the game Duck Tales.

      In a pre-release version of the game, the coffins in the Transylvania level had crosses on them. But in the final released version, that was changed so they had "R.I.P." on them instead.

  19. Re: Why censor by kojiko · · Score: 1

    americans are notorious for being the most politically correct, easiest to offend people on the good planet Earth. For every cross there needs to be a star of david. For every white person there has to be a latino, black, and asian. Equality is more important than the artists's take on the game in this country. Take Two already had to pay the Haitan government for Anti-Haitan stereotypes in GTA3 and it's making the other developers nervous (btw, this is my first post here!! happy to swing by the nerd section of the internet... it's right where i belong!)

  20. History of the Pledge by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

    Here's a quick link on the rather convoluted history of the Pledge.

  21. Is that the babies' urine or the nuns'? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'm being serious. The USA is the only country I can think of where the flag is considered sacred. I hear things about schoolchildren being forced to swear allegiance to this flag and, as a European, I'm just bewildered. Set fire to a Tricolore or a Union Jack and the French or British people will think, oh, he's making a political statement. Set fire to the Stars and Stripes and you'll have Americans frothing at the mouth and acting like you just admitted to forcing nuns to boil babies in their own urine.

  22. Christian symbols in Anime by Antisthenes · · Score: 1

    For the Anime with possibly the most Judeo-Christian symbology, check out Neon Genesis Evangelion; some of the Christian and Kabala elements are important to the story, but many seem to have no real significance. Evangelion is not for children, but even shows like Sailor Moon had a scene excised where four characters were suspended on crystal crosses.