Slashdot Mirror


USA Today and NYT on Linux rising

prostoalex writes "USA Today notices significant rise of Linux in the high-end enterprise environment. Although it doesn't provide obligatory pretty pictures, the paper mentions the projects at Pacific Northwest National Laboratory and NASA. Also if you've missed the New York Times Google article of the day, the expose on John Doerr from Valley's venerable KPCB talks about venture fund investing $12 million in LinuxCare. NYT quote: "That's a freight train I wouldn't want to get in front of," said Mr. Doerr, explaining the importance to having a stake in a Linux-based venture. "Probably get run over.''"

55 of 157 comments (clear)

  1. King of the Unbiased by strictnein · · Score: 4, Funny

    John Doerr from Valley's venerable KPCB talks about (his) venture fund investing $12 million in LinuxCare. NYT quote: "That's a freight train I wouldn't want to get in front of," said Mr. Doerr, explaining the importance to having a stake in a Linux-based venture.

    Slashdot.org: King of the unbiased quotes

    Next article: We ask Linus if Linux is l33t and Windows sux0rz

    1. Re:King of the Unbiased by GileadGreene · · Score: 2, Funny

      According to Linus even Linux "sux0rz". It just "sux0rz" less than anything else.

  2. Freight train? by sczimme · · Score: 5, Funny


    NYT quote: "That's a freight train I wouldn't want to get in front of," said Mr. Doerr, explaining the importance to having a stake in a Linux-based venture. "Probably get run over.''"

    Unlike all those other fluffy freight trains that one could "get in front of" with no consequences. I imagine his last name is pronounced "derrr" (see 'duh' [colloquial]).

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
    1. Re:Freight train? by frenetic3 · · Score: 4, Funny
      "Probably get run over."
      Well, thank God he clarified that for us. I thought the freight train would start prancing and singing show tunes.

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    2. Re:Freight train? by Black+Rabbit · · Score: 3, Funny

      The Linux Freight Train: "I think I can, I think I can..."

    3. Re:Freight train? by Omega1045 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Check this out:

      KC Article on Doerr

      From the article: His investment into Google might qualify as the best venture investment ever made -- a huge return of roughly $3 billion, or 240 times the initial $12.5 million he invested.

      I think it is Doerr, pronounce ka-ching.

      --

      Great ideas often receive violent opposition from mediocre minds. - Albert Einstein

    4. Re:Freight train? by Short+Circuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I hate it when people start throwing around talk of huge profits. Last time, it spawned a lot of companies later called ".bomb"s...

      Not that I think Google will fail...but a massive rush of investment into Linux businesses could lead to another serious round of hype.

  3. Old! :) by dorward · · Score: 4, Funny

    What I was going to say:

    Version 2.6, already running in some test settings

    Eh? Hasn't 2.6 been officially stable for quite a while? Does it run quite of a lot of production systems?

    Oooooh!

    5/3/2004

    A two month old article! Well done slashdot!

    What I realised just before I hit submit:

    Ngggg! Why can't people use ISO date format? That is the silly month/day/year format.

    1. Re:Old! :) by Anonytroll · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, we say "Day/Month". In Germany we say "on 5th June". Of course I cannot speak for other countries/languages.

    2. Re:Old! :) by pesc · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why can't people use ISO date format? That is the silly month/day/year format.

      The ISO format is YYYY-MM-DD. Big-endian, like how we write other numbers, or times. Sorts easily.

      See the ISO date format campaign.

      An interesting alternative is to do what VMS does: 4-MAY-2004 No ambiguity when you spell out the month (VMS uses three letter abbreviations). But it's not culture neutral of course...

      --

      )9TSS
    3. Re:Old! :) by wine · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In Holland we use the DD/MM/YYYY-notation and can only pronouce it as "5 juni". The much used phrase 9/11 is confusing because in our book it should refer to "9 november".

      The only reason I can think of DD/MM/YYYY is more logical than MM/DD/YYYY is because the increasing size of the time spans. But than again, in the common HH:MM:SS notation the sizes are decreasing.

      As other readers pointed out YYYYMMDD is very nice for sorting. Others say ISO should be used. But even then MM and DD can still be confusing.

      I opt for star dates. ;)

    4. Re:Old! :) by wass · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yeah, that's exactly my point. Your date order is only marginal better than the standard American system, unless you happen to write times backward.

      How would you normally write 16 minutes and 35 seconds after 3 pm? Either 3:16:35 or 15:16:35 (depending on 24-hour time being used or not). Here in USA we would say this time as "three-sixteen pm" or maybe "three-sixteen pm and 35 seconds".

      The American format is annoying, I agree. (I'm American). In my computer data files and scientific notebooks I use format YYYY-MM-DD, and occasionally for frequenctly-created files YYYY-MM-DD-HH-MM (second MM is minutes). So that's why I had a problem with your system, as it would cause the exact same kind of problem.

      A parent post above mentioned that the reason American date formats are like this is that we tend to say June 5th, and I guess Europeans and others tend to say 5th of June. But time here in USA is hour:minute (10:34). So the only real inconstincy in the American system is the position of the year, which should come first instead of at the end.

      How would you write and say the time and date? I imagine it too would have inconsistencies.

      --

      make world, not war

    5. Re:Old! :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Right, MySQL invented that. I hear they also have this new thing called "transactions" they've been working on.

    6. Re:Old! :) by dorward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seriously, people know what year it is, so saying "Two-thousand four, May fifth" is a big fat waste of time

      Given the context is the written word, and that documents will (hopefully) persist beyond one week - the reader probably won't know that the document was written in 2004 unless the document says so.

    7. Re:Old! :) by PitaBred · · Score: 4, Funny

      I use an Aztec calendar, you insensitive clod

  4. Re:Wow. what is Microsoft going to do? by grub · · Score: 5, Funny


    Their response? Bankrolling SCO for a few more years.

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  5. Re:Wow. what is Microsoft going to do? by two_stripe · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, according to the banner add at the top of this page, Windows Server has a cheaper TCO than linux.

    Maybe they'll just advertise on /. more often?

  6. begs the question ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Has any of the companies the John Doerr has launched every paid a dividend?

    Or is this just Silicon Valley Russian Roulette all over again?

    1. Re:begs the question ... by nelsonal · · Score: 4, Informative

      You were probably being facetous, but back in the day one of his first venture investments was in Compaq, which paid a dividend prior to their acquisition by HP. HP, of course pays a dividend as well. Pretty sad that you have to go back to his first venture investments (in 1980 to find a dividend paying company). Intuit could afford to and will likely begin to pay a dividend in the next few years.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    2. Re:begs the question ... by smallpaul · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Paying a dividend is only one way of rewarding shareholders. The other is to reinvest in growth. No early investor of Microsoft complained that it took them years (decades?) to pay a dividend. The trick is for the company and the shareholders to both recognize when further growth is unlikely.

    3. Re:begs the question ... by nelsonal · · Score: 2, Informative

      They haven't needed cash to invest in growth for more than 15 years. Even if you subtract their stock repurchases (really an operating expense as that is pay for their programmers and management) they haven't needed as much cash as the business generates for more than 10 years. Also, their ability to produce additional cash through investments leaves something to be desired. Windows, Office, Server tools, and bonds are the only cash generating (over their lifetime) businesses they have. Guess what the only one that is getting additional funding is the bond business.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  7. Please not another linux rising story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I would like to see Linux succeed as much as any other slashbot, but these "linux is gaining ground" and "XXXX is going to be the year of the linux desktop" stories all over the place are as old as the FreeBSD is dying posts. The next story(ies) I want to see concerning linux gaining ground is when linux surpasses its commercial competitors... specifically apple and MS. If anything I think the large number of them hurts the cause, because using solar energy as an example, years of reading about how much better things are getting and how big things are just around the corner makes you lose faith in the technology.

    1. Re:Please not another linux rising story... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      The reason you see this kind of linux propaganda is because slashdot, being part of OSDN, is up to its neck in interest in linux succeeding. Its not really a news site anymore so much as a big ad for linux.

    2. Re:Please not another linux rising story... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      The reason you see this kind of linux propaganda is because slashdot, being part of OSDN, is up to its neck in interest in linux succeeding. Its not really a news site anymore so much as a big ad for linux.


      Say. You don't suppose Slashdot expressed a pro-Linux bias well before OSDN got involved, do you? Funny, that.
  8. This isn't suprising now, is it? by MoThugz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I mean, seriously... in high-end enterprises traditionally powered by mainframes and other big iron computers, it's just waiting to be overrun by Linux.

    Sure, it can also be the *BSDs, but there's no denying that Linux is where the growth is much, much more rapid.

    Within the space of a few years, Linux already has feasible clustering technologies and tremendous kernel-level improvements (as can be seen in the 2.6 series).

    Those who can't see "the Linux advantage" in this area are just blind, or choosing to see it as a competitor to their traditional solutions, and not as a potentially profitable and cost-effective tool that it really is.

  9. Re: USA Today and NYT on Linux rising by manavendra · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I don't deny that Linux is rising. Hurrah to open source and down with evil corporations and PHBs!(err, assuming they don't exist in OSS)

    However, $12 mil is too small in today's world. The LinuxCare website does not have any customer testimonials listed. Neither is the website itself too impressive - gives you the impression of a startup. Will it crawl, walk and run? Only time will tell.

    But what's important is the disparate, yet collective impetus for individuals and organizations far and wide, into a solution that doesn't exist as a single dominant entity, but feeds upon the ever-increasing converts (or zealots).

    Let's hope, with time, not only is Linux's use spreads to corporations, but also it becomes usable and acceptable by newbie users. We all know how great and brilliant Linux is, but the true acceptance will come the day first time computer buyers will go and buy a Linux pre-installed PC.

    --
    http://efil.blogspot.com/
  10. Another Day... by cexshun · · Score: 3, Redundant

    Another article about how linux will take over the world. I love GNU/Linux as much as the next guy, but we've been seeing article like this since RH 6.0. Linux on the desktop is the king of vaporware. The article should be modded down (-1) Redundant

    1. Re:Another Day... by MoThugz · · Score: 3, Informative

      If it was yet another "corporate desktop Linux" bullpaganda, I wouldn't have bothered clicking on the article link...

      But FINALLY, it's an article about where Linux should be the OS of choice, and not where the desktop zealots think it should be.

      You did RTFA before posting now, did you?

    2. Re:Another Day... by cexshun · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Yes I did. My comment on the desktop was slightly off topic, yet still related. But my point is still valid. How long have people been saying that linux/unix is the OS of choice for corporate servers? It's not that admins don't know about linux, it's that they just don't know how to use it. You wouldn't want to install an OS as a server that you knew nothing about, now would you?

      I've talked to many other admins, and they all love the performance Linux adds to servers. But again, they just don't know how to administer linux, so they use IIS or whatever. Plus, in college, they don't teach Linux. I know at Purdue, all the classes are Visual Studio, IIS, etc. Why? Because MS gives the bookstore education copied of all their software. MS keeps the market cornered not because they are a better OS, or because linux is unknown. They dominate because they target the prime group. Students studying to be the future admins of the world.

  11. Big corporations by Elektroschock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    American provide big business stories but it usually seems to be hot air. I don't care about big business as the community depends on a few people that actually do something.

    I am not intrested in IBM urging SUN to gpl Java as IBM *easily* could provide assistence to the GNU Classpath project. And what about Jikes?

    Or Nat Friedman's anti-KDE Fud machine. Novells Suse supports KDE and he will not change that committment.

    Business stories may delight some reader, I found it rather unintresting.

    I don't think that despite for propaganda reasons big business was of any real importance. When they want provide help it's letter stamp money for them. I would like to see a real committment, i.e. manpower, code and support. I am not intrested in campaigns from the PR office.

    (While IBM's patent attorneys lobby in BXL for swpats...)

  12. The best quote! by Pranjal · · Score: 4, Interesting


    At the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory in Richland, Wash., Linux has all but taken over, said Scott Studham, associate director for advanced computing there. "When I got here three years ago, there were circa 1,000 processors here, of which four ran Linux," he said. "Now there are circa 2,000 processors, and maybe 64 of them don't run Linux."

    If this doesn't show that Linux has gained over the years then I don;t know what will.

    1. Re:The best quote! by schon · · Score: 3, Funny

      "When I got here three years ago, there were circa 1,000 processors here, of which four ran Linux," he said. "Now there are circa 2,000 processors, and maybe 64 of them don't run Linux."

      Ahh.. so what he's saying is that when he got there, they had abacuses (abaci?), and now they have Pentium-IIs?

      circa: in approximately: born circa 1900

      My question (of course), is how the hell did they get an abacus to run Linux?

    2. Re:The best quote! by Cuzzle · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I work for the laboratory and the quote is a little misleading. We actually have closer to 10,000 processors here 2,000 of which run Linux. These are the two supercomputer clusters that we have. Most of our servers and almost all the workstations have Microsoft operating systems. My group has 8 servers and about 100 workstations and only 2 servers and about 3 workstations run Linux. The supercomputers are simply incredible though!

    3. Re:The best quote! by iabervon · · Score: 4, Informative

      That link says: "circa: In approximately; about: born circa 1900"

      While not as common, "circa" is perfectly reasonable to apply to numbers.

  13. They already do! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Go to walmart.com and see pre-installed Linux machines with newbie distros! SuSE, Xandros, Linspire and Java Desktop.

    Please also try KDE 3.2 and GNOME 2.6, you will be SHOCKED how EASY THEY ARE!

  14. Linux is future by masternerd · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Linux is future for
    - Developer commnunity
    - Intelligent software and equipments (Embedded software)
    - Governments
    - Expert level users
    However, for common users linux still is away as
    - For various applications, it is not yet common to have linux version and linux drivers
    - Level of expertise (not that it is difficult but there always is resistance to change)
    - Maturity in linux.
    One thing is sure, linux march will prompt microsoft to do better in terms of price and quality.

  15. Linux is DYING by michael+path · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've decided I'm going to write an article stating "Linux is dying", citing distribution fragmenting the market, Red Hat moving to the ~$5/mo. subsciption model, the end of FreeSWAN, and SCO's litigation invoking FUD.

    I'd be full of shit, but it would be about as substanciated as some of the articles posted here on Linux lately.

    1. Re:Linux is DYING by azaris · · Score: 4, Funny

      As the result of a comment with the subject "Linux is DYING" being moderated to "+5, Insightful", Slashdot will now spontaneously implode.

      Thank you for your time.

  16. Gripe: Use of "circa" by goldspider · · Score: 3, Funny
    (offtopic rant, goodbye karma!)

    When did the words like "around", "about", and "roughly" become inadequate to convey an approximation?

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
  17. Research lab != enterprise computing by UNIXGK · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "High-end enterprise environments?" The article is about scientific research clusters (MPP), not enterprise business servers, which are typically large SMP boxes. There's a big difference between 100 one-way Linux boxes crunching numbers with Fortran and a 100-way Sun E15000 running OLTP with Oracle. The latter is a "high-end enterprise environment"; the former is not.

    1. Re:Research lab != enterprise computing by jedidiah · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, an OLTP system is remarkably similar to number crunching with a Fortran MPP. Such a system is a large collection of small operations, many of which operate on discrete sets of data.

      This is why real "high-end enterprise environments" that run such applications are deploying Linux clusters. Oracle is much better at scaling on multiple 8G systems than one 100G monster.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  18. Re: USA Today and NYT on Linux rising by Otter · · Score: 2, Informative
    However, $12 mil is too small in today's world. The LinuxCare website does not have any customer testimonials listed. Neither is the website itself too impressive - gives you the impression of a startup. Will it crawl, walk and run? Only time will tell.

    LinuxCare has been around for five years, and Kleiner Perkins was involved from the begining. It's been through multiple rounds of scandal and executive reshuffling already. It wasn't clear whether the $12M and the freight train quote are recent or from 1999. My impression is that the first is ancient news and the second is new, but maybe not.

  19. Another Close Call! by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
    I Scanned the article and read John Doerr . . .investing $12 million in LinuxCare..

    As some may now Bill Gates invests in companies like John Deere. I thought, "so that's how he's gonna get in, through the back door". Then I RTFA and said Whew!

    They play that damn Nelly and Chingy to much, when something like DEER reads as DERR and vice versa.

  20. Didn't they already go bankrupt once? by pridkett · · Score: 4, Informative

    Correcty me if I'm wrong, but didn't linuxcare already go bankrupt (or nearly so) once during the DotCom flameout? I seem to recall them having an IPO planned and then canning the IPO and laying off a large portion of their staff in the same week. The only useful thing I remember from them was their bootable business card rescue CDs.

    Heck, google doesn't even have a snapshot of text for linuxcare.com indicating it's been down for a while and was recently brought back up. In fact, the top hit for which there is a snippet is an article about linuxcare laying people off.

    Seems like some people are getting a bit too excited about the Google IPO and thinking that once again companies with no real business plan can do IPOs worth hundreds of millions of dollars. I'm sorry, but you're going to check your enthusiasm in favor or results for a little while at least.

    --
    My Slashdot account is old enough to drink...
    1. Re:Didn't they already go bankrupt once? by yoshi_mon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Seems like some people are getting a bit too excited about the Google IPO and thinking that once again companies with no real business plan can do IPOs worth hundreds of millions of dollars.

      You present a mixed message there that really is not fair to Google. They have been private and profitable for quite some time and to lump them in with "companies with no real business plan" does not help your point.

      What you point should be, imo, is that many people walking around with capital, with MBAs, or those writeing about these events have no real clue about what is really going on with IT technology and instead play there strategies off buzzwords and watered down reports.

      --

      Really, I know what I'm doing...Ohhhh, look at the shiny buttons!
  21. Considers... by grahamlee · · Score: 3, Funny
    Although it doesn't provide obligatory pretty pictures

    Hardly obligatory then, are they?

  22. New applications of Linux by justkarl · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In my free time, when not reading /., I'm an amateur producer/DJ. One program I use is called FinalScratch which implements it's own version of Linux to maximize performance. I think that hi-performance application specific apps like this, rather than using windows and outrageous system requirements, do well to implement their own shell.

    This, as well as a larger support system/better useablity for Joe User, in my opinion, is what will bring Linux into the mainstream.

  23. At the expense of HP-UX by eltoyoboyo · · Score: 5, Insightful

    From the eWeek article on January 13th, 2003: "The Pacific Northwest National Laboratory is already creating supercomputer clusters using HP rx2600 servers powered by Itanium 2 and running Linux. Scott Studham, technical lead for the lab's Molecular Science Computing Facility, said they chose Linux over HP-UX in part because they had used it in other projects. "It is very stable, very robust, and [it is] very easy to get support," Studham said."

    The rising tide of Linux at the Pacific Northwest National Laboratory came at the expense of the HP-UX. And why not? The PNNL (and NASA) employ a significant number of engineers and computer scientists at high expense. They can justify having them work on computer projects such as customizing or modifying the operating system. I would expect them to "roll their own". Using open source probably has saved taxpayers a significant amount of time and money, and may benefit us all.

    Most fortune 500 companies do not have the FTE allocations to bring in computer scientists, and instead look for packaged products and solutions.

    Bottom line: Yay for Linux!, but this is not business news.

    --
    Have you Meta Moderated t
    1. Re:At the expense of HP-UX by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2, Insightful


      Most fortune 500 companies do not have the FTE allocations to bring in computer scientists, and instead look for packaged products and solutions.


      Which is why outfits like RedHat and IBM offer their services.
  24. Government using unix derivative - not newsworthy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suppose that the government funded projects / agencies mentioned have never ever used unix before.

  25. um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't let your fanboy-ism get in the way of the truth.
    Read about those drivers on their Sourforge page:
    http://ipw2100.sourceforge.net/todo.php

    The WEP code is unstable.
    If WEP is enabled (CONFIG_IPW2100_WEP=y), it will eventually crash.
    Occassionally[sic], packets start failing decryption.
    Firmware restarts are still occuring too frequently.


    WHOO!! Go open source111!!!

  26. I like linux as much as the next guy by Gigaah · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But thinking linux is taking on the world is still a bit silly to me. Sure its gained heaps of mainstream acceptace, but to think Microsoft will let it get out of hand and become a real threat just doesn't reflect history or reality. I know the /. community myself included doesn't care for MS. However, there isn't a one that can deny the corporate giants they are and what shrewed and effective buisness men run MS. I'm not a MAC fan(never even used one) but I think Apple has a better shot IF it adopted the x86 hardware. (Just ignore the crazy guy at the bottom of the list)

  27. Other NASA uses of Linux by acre · · Score: 3, Informative

    At Johnson Space Center, the flight planning workstations are in the process of migrating from AIX to Red Hat.

    The laptops on the spacestation that are used for command and control are also moving to Red Hat from Solaris.

    Also there is a project in work to move the Mission Control Center workstations from Dec/Compaq/HP alphas runing True64 to a new platform. The two options under consideration are HP-UX and Red Hat.

  28. USA Today and Linux by garymcg · · Score: 3, Funny

    I was reading USA Today at lunch, and in the article about Frank Quattrone being found guilty for generally being sleazy, the writer states that "Frank Quattrone helped take numerous high-tech companies public, including Linux."

    Just another example of us little guys being shut out from an IPO. Not only that, it's been kept secret until now...

    --
    --If 50,000 people say a foolish thing, it is still a foolish thing.
  29. NASA Global Hawk UAV's will use linux by carn1fex · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Im making the data systems for the instruments (radars, lidars, radiometers) that are going in NASAs global hawk UAVs (the air force is hopefully going to lend us some) and im going to run it all off linux.. hooray. In reality it is the best option.. of all the cards and doohickeys going in this thing, almost all of these companies supply linux drivers now and other OS's are more randomly supported. Some do linux and vxworks, others do linux and NT etc..

    --

    ---------

    No matter how thin you slice it, its still baloney.