Slashdot Mirror


City-Sized Asteroid to Pass Earth This Fall

FiniteLoop sends a collection of links about a city-sized asteroid named Toutatis which will approach - but miss - Earth this September. MSNBC also has a story, and JPL and the Near Earth Object program have more information.

91 of 340 comments (clear)

  1. Toutatis for Celestia? by Allen+Zadr · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Where can I get a Celestia add-on for this asteroid?

    --
    Kinetic stupidity has a new brand leader: Allen Zadr.
    1. Re:Toutatis for Celestia? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'm afraid I couldn't find the path files (3ds model is available though) for this body. However, Celestia 1.3.2 is currently in beta testing, and it now has support for JPL's "Ephemeris" orbital data that might be usable instead of Celestia's .xyz trajectories. There seem to be some interesting stuff in a Google search. Maybe you can download 1.3.2 (I could only find a Windows binary) and read up / ask at the Celestia forums for more help about where to get Ephemeris data, and how to use it.

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    2. Re:Toutatis for Celestia? by Jugalator · · Score: 3, Informative

      After posting this, I found a page that might be a start... :-)

      http://ssd.jpl.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/eph

      Click "Target Body" and enter "Toutatis". The body will be found, and you can then request the data. The question is what (if any) options to enable for it, etc...

      --
      Beware: In C++, your friends can see your privates!
    3. Re:Toutatis for Celestia? by TrevorB · · Score: 4, Interesting

      I was about to ask where you could get the Orbiter add-on for the asteroid. I've not heard of Celestia. I might have to check it out.

      Does Celestia let you land on the asteroid? Does it let you compute your own interplanetary transfer orbits?

      (A warning to the newbie... Orbiter's learning curve is *very* steep, but well worth it. Getting the trans-jovian transfer orbit burn just right was pretty cool. Landing on Io was even cooler.)

    4. Re:Toutatis for Celestia? by MenTaLguY · · Score: 2, Informative

      Celestia doesn't really do anything with orbital mechanics. You just click and zoop around. It's very pretty though.

      --

      DNA just wants to be free...
    5. Re:Toutatis for Celestia? by crem_d_genes · · Score: 3, Informative

      (4179) Toutatis 2453278.07 2004 Sept.29.57 0.01036 8 oppositions, 1988-2000 MPO 6175 (4179) Toutatis

      From this link.

      The parent page has many links of interest.

    6. Re:Toutatis for Celestia? by jpkeating · · Score: 2, Informative

      For Celestia I can't say, but you can get ephemerides for most astronomy programs from http://cfa-www.harvard.edu/iau/MPEph/MPEph.html . Just type Toutatis into the big box near the top, pick your program down below, and click on Get ephemerides.

  2. City sized? by hot_Karls_bad_cavern · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would it have been that hard to find a moderately well known city to use for the comparison? Paris sized? Or Rose Bud, Arkansas sized?

    Not trolling...just asking :-)

    1. Re:City sized? by Caseylite · · Score: 5, Informative

      A little under 5 square miles, according to the article. Culver City, California Alma, Texas Lexington, South Carolina Pine Ridge, South Carolina Lake Worth, Florida In other words, a small city.

    2. Re:City sized? by PopCulture · · Score: 5, Informative

      Toutatis is about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide (4.6 by 2.4 kilometers).

      So its probably closer in size to downtown Rose Bud, Arkansas (certainly excluding the busteling suburban Rose Bud outlying areas)

      --

      Here's to finally giving Bush his exit strategy in November
    3. Re:City sized? by metlin · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Its quite unlikely to be as big as Paris or any other bigger city - the article clearly states its the size of a *small* city.

      On Sept. 29, 2004 an asteroid the size of a small city will make the closest known pass of such a very large space rock anytime this century.

      The article also says that -

      Toutatis is about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide (4.6 by 2.4 kilometers).

      Therefore, I think a small town would rather be more appropriate than a small city. Most cities today cover atleast tens of miles, if not hundreds. But then again, its relative.

      What scares me is the following line from the site -

      Researchers can't predict far enough into the future to rule out Toutatis ever slamming into Earth, so it is listed officially as a Potentially Hazardous Asteroid. NASA says it won't hit for at least the next six centuries.

      Six centuries is an awfully short time, and maybe encouraging space programs and building stations outside of Earth is probably a good idea.

    4. Re:City sized? by jonman_d · · Score: 4, Insightful


      What scares me is the following line from the site...[snip]
      Six centuries is an awfully short time...


      You've got to figure that if we can, with today's technology, figure out its path for the next 600 years, then by that time has elapsed, we'll probably be able to figure out its path for at least 1000 years. Even if we don't advance that far, 600 years is still plenty of time to figure out a plan for saving the planet (although something tells me that, the way the human race/governments work, we'll wind up waiting until the last 20 years, anyhow).

    5. Re:City sized? by stevesliva · · Score: 4, Funny

      It is definitely the size of several dozen libraries of congress and will pass withing a few moon units. However, scientists can predict its path to the less than the width of a human hair, so do not fear.

      --
      Who do you get to be an expert to tell you something's not obvious? The least insightful person you can find? -J Roberts
    6. Re:City sized? by metlin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Ofcourse! Actually, you are quite right in the last count.

      Figuring out the path is not the issue, doing something about it is. Unfortunately, even if the space organizations did figure out (I do not know if they have already figured this out or not, yet), there is no guarantee that they will make it public for a while.

      Nothing better to stir up those religious zealots saying that in FooBar years the world is going to come to an end. And even the saner public would most certainly be quite paranoid if such a prediction were to come to pass.

      That is what makes it far worse than actually knowing about it - a large segment of the population may still remain ignorant and oblivious to this. And given the brilliant red-tape that exists in most government agencies, I really wonder if we would be doing anything about it (except, ofcourse, fund a bunch of religious institutions and proclaim that some voice in the sky is going to save us all).

    7. Re:City sized? by wronskyMan · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yes, but if it hits, how many VW Beetles worth of damage will it cause?

      --
      --- You shall know the truth, and the truth shall make you mad- Neal (not Cowboy) Boortz
    8. Re:City sized? by kmankmankman2001 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Hey, it could have been much worse. Just be thankful it isn't Oprah-sized.

      --
      "The bigger the lie, the more they believe." - Det. Bunk
    9. Re:City sized? by penguinoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

      > What scares me is the following line from the site -

      >>Researchers can't predict far enough into the future to rule out Toutatis ever
      >>slamming into Earth, so it is listed officially as a Potentially Hazardous
      >>Asteroid. NASA says it won't hit for at least the next six centuries.

      Yes, the solar system is actually chaotic. It is only slightly chaotic, and orbital periods are very long, so I doubt that this is much of a concern.

      BTW, if one ever does reach an orbit that will collide with us, we will have something useful to do with all those nukes, no?

      --
      Don't waste your vote! Vote for whoever you want, unless you live in a swing state it won't matter anyways
    10. Re:City sized? by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Insightful
      the article clearly states its the size of a *small* city.
      Ok, but what's that in Volkswagens? ;-)
      --
      You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
    11. Re:City sized? by josh_freeman · · Score: 3, Interesting

      With my somewhat limited knowledge of orbital mechanics (i.e I've taken classical mechanics and played KSpaceDuel a bunch), it seems the best way to handle this is not to try to move the asteroid on approach, but to propell it further away from earth on it's outward leg of orbit. Say we knew asteroid $FOO was going to strike earth in 2020, 5 orbits from now. we would use far less fuel nudging it faster as it left past Earth (and hence into a larger orbit) than trying to decelerate and/or modify the orbit of a huge rock heading our way.

      Of course, we're still trying to move several million metric tons of iron with what amounts to an overgrown bottle rocket, so what do I know?

    12. Re:City sized? by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 2, Funny

      >(LOC)

      Yeah, but LOC count really doesn't mean much.

      How many function points big is the city?

    13. Re:City sized? by Saeger · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Six centuries is an awfully short time

      Hahahahahah! 600 years? Not a lot of time? ... AhhhhHahahhahaahah!!!

      I've got your short-term & long-term right here.

      --

      --
      Power to the Peaceful
    14. Re:City sized? by xargoon · · Score: 4, Funny

      Damnit, can't you americans adopt SI already! ;)

    15. Re:City sized? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny
      >>BTW, if one ever does reach an orbit that will collide with us, we will have something useful to do with all those nukes, no?

      I know something useful you could do with a closing italics tag right now!

    16. Re:City sized? by SamSim · · Score: 3, Funny

      Roughly the same as eight Statues of Liberty, or twelve football fields.

    17. Re:City sized? by dustmite · · Score: 4, Insightful

      If it's heading straight for Earth, you have to deflect it enough to get past the full radius of Earth. If it's heading away from Earth on the previous cycle, you only need to deflect it by a *tiny* amount, and that tiny amount will result in it passing a huge distance from Earth on the next time round. This is simply because the distance travelled after deflection is applied is so much greater, i.e. a 0.1 degree deflection applied to the full length of an entire orbital cycle (sin(0.1) * DISTANCE) (that value needs to be larger than EARTHRADIUS, so the larger DISTANCE is the better). If it's already headed straight for earth, you have perhaps only a tiny fraction of DISTANCE.

      Also if you do it on the previous cycle and mess up, you still have more chances. If you do it when it's headed straight for Earth already, you only get one chance to do it right.

      Another factor is if you accidentally cause the asteroid to break up, a huge part of it may still hit Earth if it's headed for Earth. That risk is reduced or removed if it's heading away from Earth.

    18. Re:City sized? by metlin · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Thank you for the link! I have read Kurzweil's Age of Spiritual Machines, where he discusses something like this.

      Well, but I said that 600 years is short because -

      1. We need to get off this rock at a short notice, not just a few of us but most of us.

      2. We would need to either have good space stations that can sustain us (short term) or terra-form a nearby planet (within our reach) or find a way to travel to another sector of the galaxy containing planets that are Earth-like. Remember, we will be going away for good.

      3. Assuming that our population merely doubles, and we make spaceships that will take just half of the people away, each capable of 10,000 people (which is quite a reasonably high estimate) - we will need 500,000 ships. Thats an awful lot of resources that will be needed, both energy and material.

      4. I have completely ignored the need for us to save such things as historical artifacts and memoirs from the home, etc. This is merely for the people.

      The scale for such a transfer would be staggering, and no matter how advanced we are, we will need -

      (a) Star Trek like travel (Warp/transporters)
      (b) Steady yet reliable source of food and energy
      (c) Sufficient space for such an endeavour
      (d) Sufficient *time* for such an endeavour

      Therefore, no matter what, it will be a really really mammoth task - could atleast take 50+ years. We take years to build a freeway, or a skyscraper. Assuming we somehow have cool technology that could make this even 10000x faster, we will still need atleast 50-100 years for something on this scale to be built.

      Hence my argument that six centuries is an awfully short time!

      *whew*

    19. Re:City sized? by grozzie2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      An asteroid the size of Tautatis traveling at cosmic velocities would puncture the earth. It would take less than a second for it to hit the crust after it entered the atmosphere.

      You really need to check the facts before you say things like this. Orbital velocities are in the range of 17,000 mph, and solar system escape is on the order of 28,000 mph. These numbers are close, and I'm to lazy right now to dig up exact numbers, but, google will find it for you if you want to split the hairs. Since the asteroid in question is on a solar orbit, by definition, it's velocity will be at/below 28,000 mph. Now do some simple math.
      28,000 mph divided by 3600 sec/hr = 7.7 miles per second.
      Atmosphere is generally given to be 60 miles deep.
      60 miles divided by 7.7 miles/second = 7.79 seconds

      Soo, in the worst case, velocities approaching solar system escape, and a vertical impact, transition time from atmosphere entry to surface impact (ignoring the friction and deceleration from the atmospheric entry) will be AT LEAST 7.79 seconds. A trajectory that is not vertical will increase that time in atmosphere. To achieve your 1 second from entry interface to impact, the item would have to be travelling on the order of 216,000 mph, and arrive on a perfectly vertical trajectory. This combination of trajectory and velocity will pretty much rule out any early detection of such a beast incoming.

      As for nuclear missle launch, the rockets attached to nuclear missles do not have enough power to escape earths atmosphere

      Again, quite wrong. Ballistic misslies RELY on escaping the atmosphere to achieve ballistic trajectories. What they dont do, is achieve orbit, because that wont result in 'dropping on the target'. Most are capable of achieving orbit by simply lightening the payload.

    20. Re:City sized? by Vellmont · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Why would you teraform a lifeless rock and move billions of people to it if you can just move the asteroid a bit and avoid it hitting the earth? 600 years is plenty of time to develop the technology to do this, and enough time to do it slowly (minimum energy expenditure). I've heard some ideas that merely changing the light reflectivity of the rock would change its orbit.

      --
      AccountKiller
    21. Re:City sized? by Zabu · · Score: 3, Informative

      The reply to your comment is right.
      Lets say the 7.7 miles/sec for the asteroid hits earth along its orbit(I don't know the validity of this, but giving the benefit of the doubt). Earth is traveling at around 18.2 miles/sec. That makes the distance between them shrink at about 27 miles per second. So it is more like 2 seconds to break the atmosphere and hit earth, but it is more likely not to actually make contact. It would probably just burn the earth for miles.
      This is assuming that it is morning at ground zero of the impact site, a maximum
      Interesting Link

      --
      It's all good.
    22. Re:City sized? by I+don't+want+to+spen · · Score: 3, Funny

      You mean in 600 years, everyone reading this could be dead?

      --
      Don't go to a brothel if you want to buy broth
  3. Familiar territory by Caseylite · · Score: 4, Funny

    Someone call Bruce Willis!

  4. Ironic name by AdmiralNacho · · Score: 3, Informative

    "The only thing us Gauls have to fear is the sky falling on our heads"

  5. Catch that puppy by nizo · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I always thought it would be cool to catch one of these asteroids and plunk it into a nice orbit for scavanging or using as a huge horkin' space station. However nudging it into orbit would be bad if you misjudged and plunked it down on someone (which in turn could be a great way to get rid of somebody you don't like and make it look like an accident, but that is another story).

    1. Re:Catch that puppy by jwitch · · Score: 2, Funny
      That would be a good plan. Put a naquadah-heavy asteroid on a collision course with Earth.


      No wait... that's been done already

    2. Re:Catch that puppy by tunabomber · · Score: 4, Funny

      President Bush: Well, a city-size asteroid has landed on Fallujah. It's so sad but so conv- I mean what are the odds!?

      --

      pi = 3.141592653589793helpimtrappedinauniversefactory71 ...
    3. Re:Catch that puppy by jwitch · · Score: 2, Funny

      Give me a leaver long enough...

  6. Sure. It'll miss. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    But, they fail to mention that it is of such size as to have sufficient gravity that when it passes, it will rip the oceans from the face of the earth and carry them off into space.

    All you doubters are gonna be mighty thirsty. It's going to be a hot dry 2005!

    1. Re:Sure. It'll miss. by Gulik · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, they fail to mention that it is of such size as to have sufficient gravity that when it passes, it will rip the oceans from the face of the earth and carry them off into space.

      Oooh! Oooh! I get to be Thundarr!

  7. But miss!?! by LqqkOut · · Score: 5, Funny
    > Will approach - but miss - Earth.

    ACK! "But Miss" sounds like a negative statement. I, for one, wouldn't feel the least bit sad if we're excluded from the city-sized-meteor-strikes-planet team.

    --

    -- In Soviet Russia, radio listens to YOU!

  8. Hmmm by sv25 · · Score: 5, Funny

    All of these misses... Geez, the universe sure does have bad aim!

  9. It's coming right for us! by DrugCheese · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Would they tell us if it was going to hit? Why wouldn't they? Why would they?

    --
    *DrugCheese rants*
    1. Re:It's coming right for us! by fishy+jew · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think it's a very interesting question.

      If "they" tell us, they can be sure that the whole world is going to break down: riots, suicides, etc... pretty much a total collapse of social structure.

      The reasons not to? First of all, it's mean (unethical). Second of all, what if letting the problem be known could potentially help solve it?

      I think that, in this case, if I were "they" and it was absolutely known and confirmed that impact would kill everyone on the planet, I would go ahead and let the news out. Let everyone have some fun before they all die at the same time...

      --


      Nike. Just jew it.
    2. Re:It's coming right for us! by cexshun · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Hmmm. An interesting question. However, with all the civilian observatories out there with university astrophyisists(sp?), one would imagine the information would be leaked if it was going to hit. You know there's be some hippy assistant to a university astronomer saying, "The good people of Earth deserve to know!" And, with all this publicity, I'd say every telescope in the world is trained in on it right now. And, even if they kept it quiet, it'd be hard to miss something this size and proximity to Earth, even by an amateur astronomer.

    3. Re:It's coming right for us! by Ingolfke · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course we're not going to tell you... there's only so much room here in this secret shelter... oh wait... doh!

    4. Re:It's coming right for us! by LaCosaNostradamus · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Yes, exactly, why would they (the idiosyncratic "them")?

      Depending on the severity of the strike, the response will always be governed by Elitist Cataclysmic Logic:

      SAVE US FIRST AND SCREW EVERYBODY ELSE.

      Any strike from an object detected by telescopes will be particulary severe ... you can depend upon at least a 10MT explosion in the lower atmosphere. But with objects sized like Toutatis, the strike will be a groundripper in the 100s of MTs.

      Such an event means that stock portfolios are likely to tank.

      I mean, seriously, stop laughing for a moment and think it through. The globalist elite don't stand by and let their wealth be decimated; if something even 10% of the size of Toutatis were coming, the effect upon the people of Earth would be fierce. People's involvement in the economic and social structure would severely compromise the highly artificial existence of the authority of the wealthy.

      Since real-world catastrophes are likely to adversely affect the parasitical existence of the global elite, then with something as large as Toutatis I can only expect attempts at a news blackout (and a disinformation campaign, which is even more effective) for a while until the point is moot (i.e. the thing is so close that even small, un-confiscated telescopes and binoculars can see it, or it hits).

      To use a for-example, let's say Toutatis is coming to hit us. The elite would hear about it pretty early, since the larger scopes are run by institutions and academic elites, and those are strongly connected to "them". Since Toutatis would likely strike ocean and cause thousands of billions of dollars in damage from the tidal waves, the elite will immediately put a lock on the knowledge.

      To do so, the acacdemics (certainly notorious for eruptions of dissent) would have to be controlled and discredited. The major scopes in the world will be put under lock and key simply by contacting other government entities. In fact, the act of "let's turn our scopes upon Toutatis to track it to confirm the rumor" would be the plain-view method of justifying this takeover. Various government and elite agents will show up and simply use their authority to put a lock on the data.

      Concurrent with the start of this control campaign, will be the disinformation one. False data will be generated by several sites through their controlling agents, to confuse the correct data from other sites. It will also serve to counter sites that escape control, like from the actions of some nutbag academic who thinks he's serving the "greater good" by collecting and reporting the correct data.

      And with the disinformation campaign, the issue of interal dissenters will also be addressed. More people producing conflicting data is great for that, but the issue gets even more clouded when agents step forward and confess to the fraud. With enough of this kind of thing, the public won't know what to think ... which is the entire point, since a confused and uncertain public tends to not act at all.

      After that, things get more militant. Smaller scopes will get into the game, and by then their naivete will get the better of them, letting the police, military and intelligence services get into the act (purely on orders, and we all know how much injustice happens on the basis of "I have my orders") by visiting and confiscating their scopes by one means or another. The equipment can be taken or broken; the operators can be arrested; and the operator can be enlisted in "confirmation efforts" which would just be an attempt to keep them quiet by controlling their output data.

      Well, this kind of thing can bubble along quite merrily for ... months. Perhaps a year. And faced with armageddon, months of notice can make all the difference for the survival of the elite. Underground bunkers can be readied; resources can be swallowed up into them at large rates (paid for with money that

      --
      [You have a stable society when some nut guns down a schoolyard and the law doesn't change.]
  10. City-sized? by morcheeba · · Score: 2, Funny

    On Sept. 29, 2004 an asteroid the size of a small city ...
    Toutatis is about 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide (4.6 by 2.4 kilometers).


    Well, most small cities are about 30 feet thick (about 10 feet of plumbing underground, plus a two story building above-ground), so I'm not so worried.

  11. Cause Mishaps? by Kjuib · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Is this going to set stuff off? The Ocean Tides? Car Alarms?

    --
    - Your stupidity got you into this mess, why can't it get you out? -Will Rogers
  12. Toutatis was formerly known as... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...Anna Nicole, but was recently renamed.

  13. The real quetstion by thebra · · Score: 4, Interesting
  14. Seem familiar.. Did they run out of names? by douthat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    We've seen Toutatis before:

    1989, 1992, 2004

    http://www.iki.rssi.ru/solar/eng/toutatis.htm

    Oh! it looks like this headline will come every four years... just enough time for people to forget :)

    Check it out

    --
    She loves me: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688C0 She loves me not: 09F911029D74E35BD84156C5635688BF ...
  15. This demands a BTAF strip! by Walkiry · · Score: 2, Funny

    As in Bob The Angry Flower:

    http://www.angryflower.com/astero.gif

    --
    ---- Take the Space Quiz!
  16. Cheap new ISS.... by isotope23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Too bad we cant capture it and put it in a lagrange point.

    Makes more sense to do it that way than shuttle all the crap up from earth....

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
    1. Re:Cheap new ISS.... by dsanfte · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you have any idea how much energy would be required to steer/stop an object of that size? It would be unimaginable.

      --
      occultae nullus est respectus musicae - originally a Greek proverb
    2. Re:Cheap new ISS.... by sbaker · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, let's see. (Apologies for rough math!)

      It's roughly a cylinder 2.9 miles long x 1.5 miles in cross-sectional diameter. That's a volume of about 21 cubic kilometers...21 giga-cubic-meters. A cubic meter of basalt rock weighs in at 2800kg under earth gravity...so we are up to something like 5.5 tera-newtons of mass.

      We know that:

      Force = mass x accelleration
      dist = accelleration x time x time / 2

      What saves you when you are trying to move something like this is that 'time-squared' term. Doubling the time over which you push on the rock quadruples the distance you finally move it by. This means that a tiny accelleration applied over a long time is the way to go (not a multi-megaton nuclear blast applied over a millisecond).

      The rock has a huge mass - but the force you need is the mass times the accelleration - so that tiny accelleration times that huge mass gets you into the realm of reasonably small forces...but you have to plan on applying them for many YEARS.

      To deflect this rock by a couple of earth radii, (say 10,000 km) over 100 years, needs a tiny (but continuous) accelleration of .0000000000001 meters per second per second - and even for a rock that big, that's only about half a newton/meter of force - that's *nothing*, a car engine can do a couple of hundred Newton/meters.

      So - the most gentle of pushes - if applied over a 100 years is plenty.

      This also eliminates any risk of smashing it to bits - and gives you plenty of time to correct any mistakes, refuel your motor, etc.

      Of course if you leave it until the final year before impact before you act, you need 10,000 times as much power (still do-able with enough 'bolt-on' rockets I think - but maybe you could break it up with that much force).

      If you let the politicians argue about who'se going to pay for it until a month before impact, you need a million times as much power and it's obviously too late.

      That's why we need LOTS of notice if one of these brutes coming close. 600 years is enough - but I'd definitely get very nervous if it was only 100 years away.

      --
      www.sjbaker.org
  17. Coming this fall??? by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Funny

    OMG, is there enough time to make the TV movie???

    --
    Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  18. 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide by exp(pi*sqrt(163)) · · Score: 4, Funny

    Are they sure it's completely flat?

    --
    Doesn't it make you feel good to know that our freedoms are protected by politicans, lawyers and journalists.
  19. Wow... by sczimme · · Score: 2, Funny


    Just like presidential elections!

    (I kid, of course: there's no way to escape election hoopla - carefully distinguished from useful content - for at least 2 of the 4 intervening years.)

    --
    I want to drag this out as long as possible. Bring me my protractor.
  20. God of War by sssmashy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Asterix and Obelix fans may recall that Toutatis, a name frequently invoked by those indomitable Gauls, is in fact the ancient French god of war, growth and prosperity.

    Invoking Toutatis during battle was supposed to bring about certain victory for the pre-Christian French warriors. Which is why it is such an appropriate moniker for a comet that appears just once every 500 years... ;-)

    1. Re:God of War by zboubi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Also note that the Gauls often feared that the sky might fall on their head. Let's just hope they were wrong !

    2. Re:God of War by automandc · · Score: 2, Funny
      Or, as Chief Vitalstatistix would say:

      "By Toutatis! The Sky is falling on our heads!"

      --
      I'm a lawyer with excellent karma. Something's gotta be wrong.
    3. Re:God of War by infinite9 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Of course, being a French asteroid, we can be sure that it would never hit us on account of
      the enevitable asteroid strike.

      oh hell, I have karma to burn...

      Of course, being a French asteroid, it will never hit us, just smell bad as it goes by. :-D

      or, similarly...

      Of course, being a French asteroid, it will never actually hit us because it would simply surrender once we declared war.

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    4. Re:God of War by This+is+outrageous! · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Behind the name :

      By 1989, I had already started numbering Apollo objects using gaulish gods. One which I had not used was Toutatis since I thought it was an invention of Goscinny and Uderzo, authors of the well known comic book series "Les aventures d'Asterix". There are several dozens sites about this comic book series, you may want to look at few of them :


      One of their constant saying is "By Toutatis", another one is that their only fear is that the sky may fall onto their heads.
      I discovered my ignorance of gaulish culture when I learned that Toutatis was ( or had been ) a real God. I also learned that the citation in Asterix was not a joke, but that it had been reported by some historians of Alexander the great who had met some gaulish warriors ( who had once invaded Italy and Great Britain ).
      One of the first thing we learned about Toutatis was its record low inclination. This meant that it is indeed ( in a remote future ) a good candidate to fall onto our heads. The name stuck almost immediately at the telescope when I proposed it. Toutatis, also sometimes spelled "teutates" is a totemic deity, to which human sacrifices were made.
      Don't be misled, very few french persons do know about the cruel god Toutatis, but most will talk to you about Asterix and his friends if you come to swear " By Toutatis ! ", provided you get the right (i.e. french) accent...

      --
      This is...

      O
      U
      T
      R
      A
      G
      E
      O
      U
      S

      !

  21. Don't worry... by jared_hanson · · Score: 2, Funny

    A recent attempt to fuse the tectonic plates failed and caused the oceans to drain into fault lines. We are keeping the oceans for ourselves!

    --
    -- Fighting mediocrity one bad post at a time.
  22. Yup by fiannaFailMan · · Score: 5, Funny

    The dinosaurs are extinct cos they didn't have a space programme.

    --
    Drill baby drill - on Mars
    1. Re:Yup by Geoffreyerffoeg · · Score: 4, Funny

      How do you know they are extinct? Maybe they had a space program, left for another plnet, and let the Earth be hit by the asteroid. There'd've been enough bodies of already dead dinosaurs for us to find.

    2. Re:Yup by rpj1288 · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no no, you've got it all wrong. It was the dolphins that left!

      --
      Marvin knew: "Think of a number, any number..."
    3. Re:Yup by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 4, Funny

      THey're not extinct, they're just hiding behind your funiture.

  23. To put things into perspective... by Saeger · · Score: 4, Funny
    A "city-sized" asteroid is about the size of:

    • 0.01 Texas'
    • 2000 Rock of Gibraltar's
    • 5000 Library Of Congress's
    • 10000 Empire State buildings
    • 20000 Football Stadiums
    • 150000 Houses
    • 300000 Semi Trucks
    • 2300000 "New Beetle's"
    • 2500000 VW Bugs
    • 30 Oprah's || CowboyNeal's
    (unit conversions came out of my ass just, like most stats)

    --

    --
    Power to the Peaceful
    1. Re:To put things into perspective... by Keighvin · · Score: 2, Funny

      Actually it's 25 Oprahs. Wait, now it's 823. ARGH, now it's back down to 24!

      --
      Any spoon would be too big.
  24. Planet sized rock to pass our asteroid... by tttonyyy · · Score: 4, Funny
    ...depending on your frame of reference. Perhaps they're just relieved at missing our planet? :)

    Obviously I've been spending too much time playing this.

    --
    biopowered.co.uk - catalytically cracking triglycerides for home automotive use since 2008. Just say no to big oil!
  25. Re:NUKE FIRST!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's the only way to be sure.

  26. Bottom of the seventh... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Funny


    And another swing and a miss by the Kuiper belt, the Kuiper belt is batting a .0000001 ERA against small blue planets over the course of this aeon. Of course the last hit that wasn't called foul was a grand-slam homer which cleared the field for a couple of seasons.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
  27. Actually by ziondreams · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, it appears every 4 years.

    --
    01000001 01011001 01000010 01000001 01000010 01010100 01010101
  28. Re:Gravity by f97tosc · · Score: 3, Informative

    Isn't there enough mass here to affect the tides? 2.9 miles long and 1.5 miles wide is quite a bit of area, especially if it's condensed.

    Quick order of magnitude calculation: Radius ~10^3 times smaller than moon -> ~10^9 times smaller mass than moon if comparable material.

    Also closest distance is 4 times greater than moon and gravity scales as distance squared so the tidal affects of this thing ought to be of the order 10^-10 times as strong as those from the moon - in other words impossible to notice.

    Tor

  29. Re:We should be safe... by Fearless+Freep · · Score: 5, Funny

    God does not play dice with the universe... ...He plays billiards

  30. Reckon We'd Hear About it by Greyfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If it were going to hit us? They probably wouldn't tell anyone, since they can't do anything about it anyway. You'd just see a suspicious number of politicians planning to spend some vacation time in "our underground bunker in the mountains."

    --

    I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

  31. Gotta keep your eye on the ball, son! by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Problem is, Upper Management knows there's a problem, but since they don't like it when people panic and stop attending their local salt-mines, they make a point of keeping events like this at a very low profile.

    I imagine it will be more difficult to do this as things continue to heat up.


    -FL

  32. A more practical thought... by NotQuiteReal · · Score: 2, Funny
    Why don't you just make a million dollars without having to pay taxes, or carve a boat from a block of wood?

    In case you don't know how to do either of those, I'll tell you [regards to Monty Python, etc]

    1) Make a million dollars. Don't pay taxes.
    2) Get a block of wood. Carve away all the bits that don't look like a boat.

    Nothing personal, nizo, I am just whoring for a funny moderation, but basically what you have just said is slight variation on a slashdot meme:

    1) ?
    2) use the asteroid for cool stuff.
    3) profit!

    --
    This issue is a bit more complicated than you think.
  33. Research opportunity by DustinB · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "...it will zoom by our planet within a million miles, or about four times the distance to the Moon."

    It would be cool if they could plant monitoring devices and instruments on it and then collect the data when it comes back around in four years.

  34. Re:Religion? by metlin · · Score: 2, Insightful

    :) That brought a smile to my face. And to answer your question, well not too much!

    However, it is quite funny that my comment was merely an observation of how eschatological religions would react to a situation like this, and the fact that it modded down once again proves that religious zealots abound this place.

    It is the truth, religions and religious zealots would proclaim something or the other and cause mass uprisings, and that is probably one good reason why even if the space agencies knew about such a thing, they should not let it out.

    And the last statement was merely an observation - with the current administration being right-wing conservative, and the religious climate in the rest of the world, no matter what comes to pass, people will use "faith" as an excuse and throw money at religious godheads and godmen.

    I do not see any nation (well, maybe with the exception of China) where people will rather not spend money on religion than on real solutions - that is what pisses me off. If half the faith and the funds were directed towards legitimate purposes, it would atleast make the world a better place.

  35. What might happen if it hit by the+pickle · · Score: 2, Interesting

    For all the people worring about massive worldwide destruction, have a gander at the Asteroid Impact Simulator

    Assumptions:

    -- the asteroid would be travelling at a "typical" velocity on impact, or about 17 km/s
    -- the asteroid is primarily composed of dense rock, rather than solid iron
    -- it impacts Earth at about a 45-degree angle
    -- it hits land, not water (actually not too likely, considering Earth's surface is 75% water)

    ...then you're looking at some pretty serious earthquakes and lots of broken windows within a 1000-km radius, but the worst damage would be confined to about a 250-km radius.

    Of course, this also assumes that the asteroid wouldn't break apart in the atmosphere. This thing isn't the most stable, solid asteroid ever -- the space.com article even makes mention of how narrow its "waist" is, and that it might simply be two large chunks that collided gently, sticking together because of gravity. If that's the case, it would almost certainly break apart and its impact wouldn't be nearly as severe.

    It would take a much bigger space rock than this to wipe out humanity.

    p

  36. If it hits Los Angeles by Ralph+Spoilsport · · Score: 4, Informative
    And you're here with me in San Francisco, this is what would happen, according to the impact calculator:

    Thermal Radiation:

    Time for maximum radiation:
    3.29 seconds after impact

    Visible fireball radius:
    8.4 km = 5.2 miles
    The fireball appears 2.4 times larger than the sun

    Thermal Exposure:
    1.19 x 105 Joules/m2

    Duration of Irradiation:
    77 seconds

    Radiant flux (relative to the sun):
    1.5

    Seismic Effects:

    The major seismic shaking will arrive at approximately 161.0 seconds.
    Richter Scale Magnitude: 9.1 (This is greater than any shaking in recorded history)
    Mercalli Scale Intensity at a distance of 805 km: IV. Hanging objects swing. Vibration like passing of heavy trucks; or sensation of a jolt like a heavy ball striking the walls. Standing motor cars rock. Windows, dishes, doors rattle. Glasses clink. Crockery clashes. In the upper range of IV wooden walls and frame creak.
    V. Felt outdoors; direction estimated. Sleepers wakened. Liquids disturbed, some spilled. Small unstable objects displaced or upset. Doors swing, close, open. Shutters, pictures move. Pendulum clocks stop, start, change rate.

    Ejecta:

    The ejecta will arrive approximately 436.0 seconds after the impact.

    Average Ejecta Thickness:
    2.7 cm = 1.04 inches

    Mean Fragment Diameter:
    1.4 mm = 0.0561 inches

    Air Blast:

    The air blast will arrive at approximately 2683.3 seconds.
    Peak Overpressure:
    39729.6 Pa = 0.3973 bars = 5.6416 psi
    Max wind velocity:
    73.5 m/s = 164.5 mph Sound Intensity:
    92 dB (May cause ear pain)

    Damage Description:

    Wood frame buildings will almost completely collapse. Glass windows will shatter. Up to 90 percent of trees blown down; remainder stripped of branches and leaves.

    So: In a nut shell:
    the asteroid smacks LA. A great cheer is heard round the world - that idoitic show Friends is finally off the air, and now nature is here to make sure it never sees re-runs. A fitting punishment, much like that space byport problem meted out for Really Bad Poetry. So, all in all, the erasure of Los Angeles isn't such a bad thing, in the greater scheme of things - no more Meg Ryan movies, Bruce and Demi vapourised - aaaah - not so bad at all!

    The problem is:
    on the horizon would be a largish fireball, and things here in SF would get really warm for about a minute or two. Then 2 minutes and 41 seconds later, an earthquake hits, the likes of which makes 1906 look like a joyride. Then about 5 and a half minutes later gravel comes flying out of the sky at supersonic speed. Then about 45 minutes later the wind hits at 165 miles per hour, pretty much scouring the bay area of anything left alive.

    So, while it would completely wipe LA off the map (YAY!!!) and leave a crater 35 miles wide ( |{3vv|_ !!! ) it will first lightly toast (boo!) then pulverise with hypersonic gravel (EEEK!!) then shake to pieces (Bad. Reeeally Bad) and then blow away (Suckage!) the Bay Area.

    Therefore, it is incumbent on the Bay Area to find a way to stop such a rock from hitting the earth, because, as we all know, such disasters only hit two cities: Tokyo and LA. And given that Tokyo is being continuously reduced to rubble by those giant lizards, Moths and Turtles, it's the rocks we have to watch out for.

    RS

    --
    Shoes for Industry. Shoes for the Dead.
  37. What would be left after 60 million years? by jmichaelg · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Your post got me to thinking - if the dinosaurs had been sentient, what evidence would they have left behind that they had built cities, space programs etc.? Would a reptilian Vesuvius survive for 60 million years? Would we recognize it as such if we found it?

    1. Re:What would be left after 60 million years? by dustmite · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Your post got me to thinking - if the dinosaurs had been sentient

      Aren't you mixing the concepts of "sentient" and "intelligent" a bit? It seems quite plausible (and perhaps even reasonable to assume) that many less intelligent Earth animals than us (e.g. dogs or pigs or elephants) are sentient, but they don't have the intelligence required for creating complex industrialised civilisations.

      Hmm .. if we assume they had built cities or perhaps even small villages, how much evidence of those structures would remain today? Probably nothing if they had reached about the same level of technological advancement that humans were in the year 1900. Even big things like pyramids will probably be long gone (unless buried?). Now we have things like plastics and huge landfills, yet even most modern plastics degrade in "only" tens of millions of years. If humans vanished off the face of the Earth today, I think our buildings and other structures will be long gone in 60 million years, even a long-developed area such as London will probably have been reclaimed by trees, plants, grass etc. However, we will definitely have permanently altered virtually all of the planet's ecosystems, that will be evident. And certain spots where there are high densities of pollutants (e.g. plastics or chemical pollutants) will probably still have higher densities of those things, leaving evidence of their locations. The crumbled rubble of huge cities like London or New York will, if buried over time, probably leave some sort of permanent layer of sediment with "interesting" chemical make-up.

      So that's a weird thought, if dinosaurs had reached 1900-levels of technology, and lived in cities and villages and had a global trade system, there might actually be virtually no evidence of it now. Or maybe I'm wrong, haven't thought about it much.

    2. Re:What would be left after 60 million years? by ColaMan · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Well, presuming that they advanced to (or beyond) a bronze age, they'd need minerals that you'd most easily get by mining and refining, and the evidence of previous mining of a mineral deposit would be easily spotted by a geologist 60 million years later (a lot of strata disruption,shattered rock indicating the use of explosives, trace mineralisation with no "body" in the centre... etc.)

      --

      You are in a twisty maze of processor lines, all alike.
      There is a lot of hype here.
    3. Re:What would be left after 60 million years? by dustmite · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You're assuming that their civilisation would be like modern Western civilisation. Why would they necessarily be doing mining on such a scale as to need explosives? Would they even need that many minerals? I mean, we generally don't, only minimally so for industrial uses, and who is to say that dinosaurs would have cared about jewelry? You can have farming, villages, housing and trade without minerals, and with only a minimum of metals (yes you can, study history). African civilisations have been forging metal tools for thousands of years without explosives. Study human history a bit, there have thousands of different types of civilisations and civilisation infrastructures, and we've only recently used explosives for mining. Look at the evidence left behind by most vanished human civilisations - it's pitiful, normally amounting to a few remains of buildings and some pottery, and not much else, if there is anything at all - and these are all less than 10,000 years old - only 0.01 percent of 65,000,000 years.

    4. Re:What would be left after 60 million years? by hesiod · · Score: 2, Funny

      > I don't think a T-Rex would have much use for a bow and arrow.

      Toothpicks?

  38. OT: request for knowledge! by B5_geek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Howdy all,
    Reading this article got me thinking about how often we hear about these 'near-misses' well odds are we had just as many 'near-misses' for the last 100 years.

    Well I witnessed a very unusual event about 21 years ago.

    I was "camping" in our back yard with a school-chum (we were about 10 years old at the time) and late in the night (11pm - 1am Eastern) We saw in the south-west sky (Southern Ontario near Detroit, MI) a bright orange object. (Bright orange because it was obviously in the semi-shadow of the Earth, bent light thing)

    It was about the size of a soccer-ball (held 4' away) and very high in the sky. We saw it BOUNCE twice and disappear over the western horizon.

    No flames from the atmosphere, but it was covered with impact craters. (It looked like a mini version of the moon) Very cool stuff that I will never forget.

    Who/Where/How can I bring this to (vague information and all) to find out exactly what it was? I don't remember hearing anything about it in the news the next day, but I was probably more interested in GI Joe.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." ~Plato (427-347 BC)
  39. Teaching... by ballpoint · · Score: 2, Informative
    For physics sake, dude, get your dimensions right.

    weighs in at 2800kg under earth gravity ?
    5.5 tera-newtons of mass ?
    half a newton/meter of force ?
    car engine doing a couple of hundred Newton/meters ?

    weight (a mass under acceleration) is measured in Newton (kg.m/s/s, not kg)
    mass in kg (not in newton)
    force in Newton (not in newton/meter)
    torque in Nm (Newton times meter, not Newtons per meter)

    Explain what the torque of a car engine has to do with moving an asteroid, unless you have found a place to stand on and use Archimedes' lever ?

    --
    Flourescent (adj): smelling like ground wheat.
  40. Target practice! by Hogbert · · Score: 2, Insightful

    One of these near-miss asteroids _should_ be used for real life evaluation of asteroid nudging.

    1) Plan beforehands, reserve ammunition
    2) *kapow*
    3) Analyze and learn.

    A stone like this would provide excellent material for evaluating different methods; is it better to nuke the stone, mount a rocket or do something else.

    Hogbert

    --
    Microserf: 18.5% slashdot corrupt
  41. how about "magsailing" a rock to safety? by perfessor+multigeek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Well, given that this thred was started by a superconductivity guy, it seems only natural to ask, how about inducing an itty bitty (relatively) current across said asteroid if it is indeed mostly iron (some aren't, ya know) and try to get the induced magnetic field aligned to get it to shift path within the solar system's ambient fields? After all, we're talking about a LONG period of time and a tiny shift in direction. I'm too lazy to do the numbers, but seems to me that rockets of any sort might be a needlessly brute force approach. (And yes, I *did* just reread Flynn's Lodestar .)

    Rustin

    --
    Data is the lever, rigor the fulcrum, brains the force that drives it all.