Slashdot Mirror


In-Flight Wi-Fi Makes its Debut

mindless4210 writes "German airline Lufthansa will become the first carrier to provide Boeing's Connexion service to its passengers. The service will be unveiled on May 17 on non-stop flights from Munich to Los Angeles, with plans to outfit their entire fleet over the next year. Passengers will be able to purchase access using their credit cards and Wi-Fi enabled laptops. The cost is set at $30 for the entire flight or $10 for 30 minutes."

43 of 336 comments (clear)

  1. Whole new world.. by baudilus · · Score: 5, Funny

    mid-air LAN party!!

    1. Re:Whole new world.. by Otto · · Score: 5, Funny

      I really don't want people yelling out "Look out for the rocket!" during my flights, personally.

      --
      - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
    2. Re:Whole new world.. by frenetic3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Anyone know what the latency (ping times) would be on the Connexion service? Would it be like satellite (hundreds of ms?) (I know parent was referring to the plane's LAN in which latency is negligible, but what about communications to the rest of the world?)

      -fren

      --
      "Where are we going, and why am I in this handbasket?"
    3. Re:Whole new world.. by NanoGator · · Score: 5, Funny

      "mid-air LAN party!!"

      Finally! Geeks can join the Mile High club! Too bad it won't have the same significance...

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    4. Re:Whole new world.. by baudilus · · Score: 4, Informative
      from the CBB FAQ (currently /.ed):
      What is the Connexion by Boeing service infrastructure?
      * Airborne system: airborne antennas, airborne servers, routers, and associated wiring.
      * Ground system: network operations center, associated satellite uplink and downlink equipment, and business operation center.
      * Space system: leased satellite transponders.
      It looks like they do use satellites, but they also seem to have ground NOC's and antennae. They don't say which is used for what, but it's safe to assume that it won't be as fast as my optonline connection :D
    5. Re:Whole new world.. by Shakrai · · Score: 4, Interesting

      mid-air LAN party!!

      I'm sure your just joking around to get your +5 funny FP but in all seriousness why would you pay Lufthansa $30 to have a mid-air LAN party? If you wanted to have a LAN party (not a bad idea on a eight hour+ flight -- I'd do it if I had a few friends tagging along with me) and they allow Wi-Fi on the plane then why not setup your own Ad-Hoc network that doesn't cost you anything? Unless you need access to the Internet (which you won't for a LAN Party) why give them the money?

      That's a pretty interesting idea too. If they are going to allow you to broadcast in the 2.4Ghz range on the airplane then they can't refuse to let you do this. Could be interesting on those long flights. Now your only problem is how long your battery will last :)

      Another (slightly evil) idea would be to have one person buy the Internet access and then share it with the rest of his buddies using a second wireless NIC and the aforementioned ad-hoc network. I wonder if they'd get peeved if you did this? Kinda doubt they'd find out but what's the worst they could do? Boot you off? Something tells me that the crew has better things to do then monitor the Wi-Fi network to make sure you aren't sharing it.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    6. Re:Whole new world.. by paul248 · · Score: 3, Funny

      A NOC on the ground is completely unnecessary. They just have to copy the Internet onto the satellites before launching them.

    7. Re:Whole new world.. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Informative

      They will refuse to allow this. None of your discussion of enforcability is relevant to what I said, as I didn't make any claims about how or if they would enforce this rule. I'm pretty sure that setting up your own wi-fi network on a plane would not be allowed, so I don't see why them having their own network would change this.

      I wouldn't mind hearing why they refuse to allow this. I only responded so quickly because you made a one line comment of "Yes they can" without anything to back it up. What reason would they have to _not_ allow you to do this? What would be next? Refusing to allow people sitting next to each other to use a crossover cable or IR-link? What possible reason would they have to do this other then pure greed?

      Besides my whole point all along was that you don't need to be associated to their AP to play LAN games. It's not "setting up your own wi-fi network" -- you aren't bringing an AP to the party and plugging it in. I don't see why they would refuse to allow you to do this (obviously the RF isn't a factor if they have Wi-Fi in the first place) or how such a rule could be enforced given that many laptops have internal wi-fi systems and there would be no obvious indication that an ad-hoc network was actually functional.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
    8. Re:Whole new world.. by Shakrai · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Today, they don't let you use electronics during takeoff and landing. What possible reason do they have not to let me use my gameboy or my discman? None. But they don't want to deal with certifying every possible piece of electronics that might or might not be safe because it's not worth the trouble and the risk of being wrong is so high. Similarly, anything involving broadcasting over radio frequencies is going to make them uncomfortable, unless it's the specific application they've set up.

      Understood but you still aren't answering the question of how are they going to know you are doing this. I wasn't suggesting that you hack their internet access -- I was suggesting that you setup a private ad-hoc network to communicate with your buddies on the plane. There is simply no way they are going to know that you are doing this.

      As for "What possible reason would they have to do this other then pure greed?" Isn't "pure greed" enough? They are providing you a way to have wireless that they have set up and verified is safe. You are trying to get around paying for it in a way that they are not confident is safe. They aren't going to like that.

      What am I trying to get around paying for? They are selling me Internet Access. What if I only want to be able to send ICMP echos to my friend in 6B? It's still a moot point as I maintain that there is no way they could tell that you were doing this. If they start allowing wi-fi on the plane do you really think they will notice if somebody sets up a little ad-hoc network? If they are allowing wi-fi in the first place it's obviously safe.

      --
      I want peace on earth and goodwill toward man.
      We are the United States Government! We don't do that sort of thing.
  2. Wink wink by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does this mean that us nerds can now join the "mile high club"?

    1. Re:Wink wink by josh3736 · · Score: 4, Informative

      I don't believe your own right hand counts for admission to the mile high club.

  3. Plane 2 Plane by SirChris · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Any use for plane to plane communications? quickly sending your vital stats, etc. or just as a log of who you have passed.

    1. Re:Plane 2 Plane by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Any use for plane to plane communications? quickly sending your vital stats, etc. or just as a log of who you have passed. "

      Incoming Message from user NanoGator
      ___________________________________

      If u can recieve dis message, UR 2 FRICKEN CLOSE!!!!!!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. Interesting... by Sv-Manowar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can't wait till someone acidentally starts controlling the plane with MS Flight simulator
    "Pull up!, Pull up!"

    1. Re:Interesting... by Soko · · Score: 4, Funny

      Captain: Ummm... Where did you say we were?
      Navigator: My instruments read that we're over LAX.
      Captain: Then why the FUCK are we over Hawaii?
      Navigation Screen: *LOL, d00dz! U R too dumb t00 n0t uze W1|\|d0z3 on ur navsystems!! hanhan, surfs up!!!*

      Soko

      --
      "Depression is merely anger without enthusiasm." - Anonymous
    2. Re:Interesting... by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 5, Funny
      Can't wait till someone acidentally starts controlling the plane with MS Flight simulator

      You mean *Crashing* the plane don't you

      Either

      • Microsoft Flight Simulator has encountered errors and needs to close
      • or...
      • Microsoft Windows XP has detected a new device (plane) and is unable to find a driver for it
  5. feels strange by Chuck+Bucket · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I used to look forward to flights because it gave me time to get lost in a book while sipping some whiskey. now I'll be answering (and dealing with) crap from work? I'm not sure if I'll do this; some times you just can't reach me (this is why all of my phones are off when I'm asleep).

    CVS

    1. Re:feels strange by TopShelf · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Sad days, indeed. Instead of the old, "coffee, tea, or me?" it's become "coffee, tea, or 802.11b?"

      It would seem our priorities are getting seriously out of whack.

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
  6. How long will it be.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    ...before we start hearing horror stories about sitting next to sketchy guys who are checking out pr0n on the plane?

    1. Re:How long will it be.... by Gr33nNight · · Score: 4, Funny

      You dont need the internet to check put porn on a website. Why do you think people have 6 120-gig hard drives on their PC? Not that I am saying I have 6 120-gig hard drives on my computer full of Jenna Jameson DIVX, organized by year or anything.

    2. Re:How long will it be.... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...before we start hearing horror stories about sitting next to sketchy guys who are checking out pr0n on the plane?

      May 17th.

  7. The guys doing flyovers for wifi hotspots. by linzeal · · Score: 5, Funny
    Will have a moving target now, this ought to be fun. Maybe we will see cessnas darting in and out of 747 flight paths to get free internet access, right?

    1. Re:The guys doing flyovers for wifi hotspots. by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Funny

      Maybe you could just follow behind them and just below their slipstream off to the sides like geese. You'd get an improvement in efficiency and free WiFi.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    2. Re:The guys doing flyovers for wifi hotspots. by ryanwright · · Score: 4, Funny

      Only on /. can two people named "Penguinshit" and "drinkypoo" have a meaningful, intelligent conversation about the flight characteristics of aircraft, air turbulance and subsequent problems associated with navigating a larger craft's slipstream.

      --
      -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig
  8. Interference by RobPiano · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I would love to have wifi on a long flight and $30 isn't completely unreasonable for a flight from Germany to California. This is all fine, but can someone explain to me if we can have wifi on a flight, why can't I have my CD player turned on when the plane first takes off? I've never understood how a CD player could mess with their equipment very much, but I can imagine wifi being a bit of a problem...

    1. Re:Interference by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Its much easier to explain to the general populus that NO electronics can be used during take off, as opposed to explaining a whole list of items that can't be used.

    2. Re:Interference by UrgleHoth · · Score: 5, Funny

      I get around this restriction by bringing aboard my trusty old victrola.

      --

      Dogma - "let's just say we'd like to avoid any empirical entanglements."
  9. stealing the connection by jridley · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can see people who don't want to pay for the connection sniffing someone's traffic, then cloning their MAC address and surfing for free after the guy switches off.

    1. Re:stealing the connection by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Interesting

      What about proxying?

      If you're flying with office mates, one buys service time, and proxies the other(s).

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  10. pr0n! by joda · · Score: 3, Funny

    wohee, now i don't need to wait for the hotspots in arrivals ...

    --
    Buy all your crazy japanese videogames from
  11. VoIP by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are the odds that VoIP ports are either blocked or the latency makes it unusable? The airline industry has put quite a bit of effort into explaining why Airphone is The Only Right Way to talk from a plane.

    "Ladies and gentlemen, we must ask that you not use your laptop as a phone over the internet as it... may cause cancer."

  12. Flash vs. no Flash by Big+Nothing · · Score: 4, Informative

    A Flash-free website with information on Boeing Connexion can be found here.

    --
    SIG: TAKE OFF EVERY 'CAPTAIN'!!
  13. Re:Pricey by krisp · · Score: 4, Insightful

    You still don't have an electrical outlet. Lets hope you have 9 hours of battery life to get your money worth!

  14. Re:How long by drinkypoo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    put two wifi cards in your laptop and run an open "ap", and everyone with you (or optionally, everyone) can use the service for the price of just you.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  15. Why you can't listen on takeoff & landing by k2dbk · · Score: 5, Informative
    I've never understood how a CD player could mess with their equipment very much...
    I once asked why, and was told that they don't want you to not be able to hear any announcement that might be made during those "critical" times.
  16. Re:Have you ever used an Airphone by nacturation · · Score: 3, Informative

    It took about 10 attempts to get it to work, the instructions were inaccurate, when something went wrong it just produced a random tone... when i actually got it to work the call was so noisy I could hardly make out a word she said.

    Worst $10 call ever...


    Next time that happens, call your credit card company and reverse the charges due to "service not as advertised". Lufthansa (or whoever provides the service) will then have to eat the cost of the call. If more and more people do this, it'll force them to either drop the service (due to chargeback costs) or improve the quality.

    --
    Want to improve your Karma? Instead of "Post Anonymously", try the "Post Humously" option.
  17. Across the country for $200 you have to be kidding by razmaspaz · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the airfare, which on any flight is ample

    You can cross the country for ~$200. That's cheap by any standard. Seriously. how can you say that airlines are overcharging and should be adding services for free. The idea that you can get from New York to LA in 6 hours. That is madness. Tell that to the pioneers that took 6 months and spent hundreds of dollars (in 1850's money) and they would shit a brick.

    If anything you should get free airplane flights with your starbucks. They are the ones overcharging. $2-3 for a cup of coffee. At that price it better come with some pr0n.

    --
    I tried for 5 years to come up with a clever sig...only to realize that I am not clever.
  18. PPP multilink over Air phones by Danathar · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bah...

    I'm getting decent speeds by taking three airphones (three seat wide section) and using a uunet dialup account to bind all three together using ppp multilink. I just charge the airtime back to my company!

    I tried to use more phones from the passengers seats infront and behind me....but the cords are too short! DAMN!!

  19. To save 30 bucks after spending $900 on tickets? by tempshill · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I don't think spoofing is a very great concern. The point of Lufthansa installing this is that business customers will fly Lufthansa and not BA. It's not to get thirty bucks.

  20. Analysis by wowbagger · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, to do security one must think like the bad guys. So let us put on our black hats for a moment.

    Only fairly well off people will fork over $30 to feed their Internet addiction - most of all the super-type-A types who cannot tell the difference between "being busy" and "being productive".

    Most of those people will be running Windows, probably Win98 or WinXP.

    So, if I just sit back, wait for them to get their mail, sniff the password they use for email, and then use that password in an attempt to access their computer, I will probably get right in.

    Then I can Trojan their machines (for later access to the inside of whatever corporate network they use), download their My Documents folder and desktop, and see what I can dig up.

    The beautiful thing about this is that I have every excuse to be close to these people for extended period times, then I get off the plane and go my own way, never to cross the guys path again. /me removes black hat

    Gosh, I am SO glad I am not in IT management....

  21. 10$ for 30 mins? by nurb432 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Isn't that a bit high? Seems like its expensive to just check your spam, err email..

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  22. Re:Entirely bizarre - why not Ethernet? by mean+pun · · Score: 4, Informative
    Given that each seat already has a myriad of cabling going to it, I simply can't see why they've opted for WiFi connectivity - other than as a gimmic.

    Two good reasons are weight and maintenance. All that extra wiring may be a small fraction of total takeof weight, but why waste it, when you can get paid for air freight or burn less fuel? Also, keeping all those connectors functioning is much harder than keeping a wireless access point running.

    Oh, and installing all that wiring would require a lot of expensive maintenance time, whereas installing a wireless access point is fairly simple.

  23. Re:Doesn't this interfere with by ryanwright · · Score: 3, Funny

    When was that last time you could get more then five hundred feet from your access point.

    When I used a coat hanger, pringles can, home-made drive circuit and powered by a 12v deep cycle marine battery. I can't /wait/ to bring that on the plane! "Haha, you wussies, I've got a clear signal from the plane all the way back here at the security checkpoint! Yeah, I rock, you all.. hey, wait a minute. No no, let me go! GAH! MY LAPTOP! NO NO DON'T PUT THE LATEX GLOVES ON AGAIN!! HEEELLPPP!!!"

    --
    -Ryan, with the unoriginal sig