Slashdot Mirror


Newsflash: Gourmet Coffees Have Lots Of Caffeine

Evangelion writes "According to the Globe and Mail, gourmet coffees (Starbucks, Second Cup, etc) apparently have lots more caffeine than their non-gourmet competitors. One jumbo (20-oz) contains an entire day's worth of C8H10N4O2." Remember, for best effect, drink it through the day, not all at once.

33 of 500 comments (clear)

  1. I knew it! by Mz6 · · Score: 4, Funny
    --
    Hmmm.
    1. Re:I knew it! by cshark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I think the term no duh comes into play here. Starbucks and friends use coffee that is derived from espresso. Espresso tends to have more caffeine in it. I could have told you that. If you want to get angry, get angry at the soda manufacturers that put caffeine where it shouldn't be (unidentified citrus soda?) as a play to get you hooked. Last I checked oranges and corn syrup didn't naturally have caffeine in them. There was an expose about it on the local news here in Indy awhile back. They said it compares to what the tobacco industry does with nicotine. The only difference... Nobody really cares.

      --

      This signature has Super Cow Powers

    2. Re:I knew it! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 5, Informative
      Starbucks and friends use coffee that is derived from espresso.

      Wrong. "Espresso" is a technique for producing a coffee beverage. It forces hot water under high pressure through tightly-packed grounds. Espresso *does* have more caffeine than brewed coffee, mostly since it is stronger. However, the article appears to be talking about ordinary brewed coffee.

      I must agree that "Charbux" coffee is extremely over-roasted. When Cook's Illustrated did a coffee comparison, their tasters didn't like Starbucks. When they had some people that work blending coffees check them out, their opinion was that Starbux beans were higher quality than the others, but they were so burned that the result was just plain ol' nasty. I'd give a reference to the article, but it's subscription-only. It is clearly the nerd's cooking magazine, though.

    3. Re:I knew it! by Rostin · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is a common misconception. The only difference between what is usually called coffee and espresso is method of preparation. The only drink Starbucks serves that fits your description ("coffee that is derived from espresso") is an Americano, which is made from pulling a shot (or two) of espresso and adding hot water.

      To make things clearer, most brewed coffee comes from a drip machine. Water at close to boiling is "dripped" through ground, roasted coffee.

      Espresso is a whole different animal. The water is a little warmer, and instead of dripping, it is pumped under about 9 bar of pressure through a puck of finely ground coffee. The ratio of coffee to water is also far higher (so it does have more caffeine on a unit volume basis).

      Commonly coffee intended for espresso is roasted a little darker than coffee intended for drip, but it doesn't have to be.

      Caffeine content in coffee (brewed by the same method, with the same degree of grind) has mostly to do with how it is roasted (darker = more burnt = less caffeine) and what kind of bean it comes from. It is usually claimed that robustas contain more caffeine than arabicas, and also that most premium coffees are arabicas. What's confusing is that Starbucks has a reputation for burning their coffee and presumably would use higher grade arabicas. *shrug*

    4. Re:I knew it! by Phurd+Phlegm · · Score: 4, Informative
      Um, isn't this just a matter of taste? I *like* darker roasted coffee.

      To some extent, yes. However, the good-quality beans are just wasted if you char the coffee to the extent Starbucks does. The darker the roast, the less of the flavors are . . . well, "visible" is clearly not what I mean--maybe "perceptible" is. Certainly I don't want to interfere with your coffee enjoyment, but all their beans are roasted till they scream--a good roaster roasts different beans differently to enhance their characteristics.

      IFAIK Starbucks does some basic things to produce a consistently high quality product; they start with quality beans, roast them darker than is usual, grind them immediately before use, brew with more ground coffee (the thing that increases the caffeine content) and most importantly they DON'T let it sit around and get stale - they throw it out and brew fresh after an hour.

      All good, but they let the coffee stale before they use it. We have a local chain where everything is used within three or four days of roasting. Starbucks, by contrast, will tell you that freshly-roasted coffee must "age" before being used. This in my opinion is bunk--nothing is better than freshly-roasted coffee. Well, nothing that you can consume in public, to forstall the jokesters.

      Judging by the success of starbucks I'd say a lot of other people feel the same.
      Judging by that standard, McDonald's coffee is a lot better than Starbucks, and the New Beetle is a better car than the M3 (if they still make one, that is). Starbux' success is more a triumph of marketing than of sheer coffee quality. I was going to link The Onion's article "New Starbucks Opens In Rest Room Of Existing Starbucks," but it isn't available any more. Dang.
    5. Re:I knew it! by Hatta · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I must agree that "Charbux" coffee is extremely over-roasted. When Cook's Illustrated did a coffee comparison, their tasters didn't like Starbucks. When they had some people that work blending coffees check them out, their opinion was that Starbux beans were higher quality than the others, but they were so burned that the result was just plain ol' nasty.

      They have to do that to get consistancy. The point of the franchise is that everywhere you go in the country or world you get exactly the same product. They couldn't do that if they let the natural flavors come through.

      --
      Give me Classic Slashdot or give me death!
    6. Re:I knew it! by the_mad_poster · · Score: 5, Funny
      NEW STARBUCKS OPENS IN RESTROOM OF EXISTING STARBUCKS

      CAMBRIDGE, MA -- Starbucks, the nation's largest coffee-shop chain,
      continued its rapid expansion Tuesday, opening its newest location
      in the men's room of an existing Starbucks.

      "Coffee lovers just can't stand being far from their favorite Starbucks
      gourmet blends," said Chris Tuttle, Starbucks vice-president of
      franchising. "Now, people can enjoy a delicious Frappuccino or espresso
      just about any time they please ...."

      The new men's-room-based Starbucks, the coffee giant's 1,531st U.S.
      location, will be open to both men and women when not "in use." In
      addition to offering specialty coffees from around the world, it will
      serve freshly baked pastries, Italian pannini sandwiches and soups, as
      well as the rest room's usual selection of toilet paper and soap.

      According to Starbucks CEO Howard Schultz, the new location represents the
      beginning of a long-term expansion plan. "Eventually, Starbucks rest rooms
      everywhere will sell coffee," Schultz said. "But that ambitious scheme is
      at least five years down the road. In the meantime, we plan to open an
      additional location in this Starbucks' ladies' room within months, and are
      already drafting plans for a fourth restaurant along the corridor leading
      from the main seating area to the rest rooms. At some point a 'Star-bucks
      Express' window will eventually open in the walk-in closet of the men's
      room Starbucks."

      "Drink our coffee," Schultz said. "Drink it."
      --
      Alito: A vote for Alito is a punch in the eye to put that bitch back in her place!
  2. PFFFTTTTT! by darth_MALL · · Score: 5, Funny

    TH-th-th-that's a t-t-t-total load of c-c-c-crap! Stewardess! Another Venti! Now!

  3. Makes me wonder... by SCSi · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if they do this on purpose, so they can hook you then make you come back to more.. Caffeine withdrawls suck, and if the home-made stuff isnt as potent, people are pretty much the slave of starbucks (or have to drink 2x more home-made coffee)...

    1. Re:Makes me wonder... by ron_ivi · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Considering how successful tobacco, alcohol, soft-drink, etc. companies are, I'm almost surprised coffee shops didn't catch on to this "more caffeine gets people hooked faster" insight earlier.

    2. Re:Makes me wonder... by That's+Unpossible! · · Score: 4, Funny

      which is good because starbucks coffee is really gross! burnt to a crisp before brewing, yuck!

      My dad (coffee connoisseur) always complains about their "burnt coffee," and I always thought he was just trying to describe the flavor... then I bought a bag of starbucks dark roast whole bean.

      No joke, that shit (or rather, those beans) are BURNT. They were also incredibly oily. Perhaps as a side effect of being burnt (fried? :)

      (and they make their employees work when sick. super)

      I'm afraid they don't make their employees do anything; they choose to work at Starbucks.

      However, if they don't encourage their sick employees to stay home from work, that would be rather gross.

      Personally I'll stick to my Dunkin' Donuts fresh ground coffee brewed in a french press (freedom press?).

      --
      Ironically, the word ironically is often used incorrectly.
    3. Re:Makes me wonder... by Stigmata669 · · Score: 4, Insightful
      I think the intention is less dubious than trying to "hook you" and more likely that people like the caffeine high, and are more likely to spend 3.85 for a latte if they get more of a high.

      I recently bought a pound of pure Arabica bean which has a very good flavor: no bitterness even in a very strong espresso. My mother who also tried the coffee immediately didn't like it because the caffeine content is much lower in the Arabica bean (most blends have Robusto(sp?) which is very high in caffeine and has a bad/bitter flavor) so she didn't get the normal buzz. "Does this coffee work?!"

      --
      Yawn.
    4. Re:Makes me wonder... by spun · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The description is a good thing, but just like their damn cup sizes, why deviate from a perfectly good standard in naming the roast? Coffee tasting is exactly like wine tasting, in fact, and has a standard language that does borrow a lot from wine tasting. Of course, one of the descriptive terms used is 'winey' which I don't think wine tasters use. :-)

      The place I worked at in New Haven, CT, Willoughby's (An old and well respected name in the coffee biz, btw), had numerous pamphlets describing coffee tasting terms, and the different tastes of the different types and roasts of coffee. They had professional tasters who would visit the coffee producing regions of the world and the big coffee trade shows evey year and rate the coffee, deciding what to buy based on what was good (and fashionable, to be honest) that year. They do it like wine tasters, noisily slurping pure strong coffee out of little cups then spitting it out and rinsing with water in between.

      They trained us counter people really well. We kept a seperate grinder for flavored coffees so as not to contaminate the good stuff. We would always try to talk people out of buying flavored coffees and into grinding it themselves, "You know they invented flavored coffees to cover up the taste of bad beans, right? And you know it loses most of it's flavor two hours after you grind it, right?"

      We would also try to talk people out of the really expensive and over rated stuff. Guess what, folks? Kona is crap coffee, weak and flavorless. It's only expensive because it's from Hawaii and it has a mystique. Know what else? Jamaican Blue Mountain coffee is mediocre. It's almost identical to Columbian.

      My favorites have always been Guatamalan Antigua for it's complex spicy flavor, and Kenya AA for it's acidity and winey taste. Full city roast, fresh from the roaster, ground, brewed and drunk right there. If you haven't tasted really fresh roasted coffee, you haven't tasted gourmet coffee at all. Coffee loses 90% of the volatile gasses trapped in the beans within two days of roasting, unless kept in a cool, dark, airtight container, in which case it takes a week. Know why they put those valves on sealed coffee bags? IT'S TO LET THE FLAVOR OUT! Seriously, the escaped gas that contains almost all the varietal distinction and aroma has to go somewhere or the bag will explode.

      I got so addicted to the taste of fresh roasted coffe, I started roasting it at home in a cast iron skillet. Gave it up after a few months because it was too much work and made the house smell of roasting coffee (which doesn't smell nearly as nice as brewing coffee.)

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
    5. Re:Makes me wonder... by greenplato · · Score: 4, Interesting
      and they make their employees work when sick. super

      This is completely off topic, but I'll jump in with two feet... (I write as a former Starbucks partner with two years of experience from the bottom up to middle management)

      Fortune Magazine consistently rates Starbucks as one of America's top 100 employers. There is a reason; they offer excellent benefits, reasonable compensation, and a good working environment. On paper, if you look at the training programs and advancement opportunities within the company, it looks fantastic from the outside. Specifically, there are company (and health code) regulations that forbid sick people from working.

      However, these do no good within a company with an entrenched corporate culture that encourages and rewards dishonesty, bullying, cheating, and backstabbing. Unwritten rules always trump written policies making the job a joyless hell for some.

      Consider this scenario: you work at Starbucks part time, about 20 hours a week. This is the cut-off point for heath converage (a quite generous plan); partner must maintain 20 hrs/week to be eligible for this coverage. Sick leave is not available for hourly employees. So if you are sick you face the tough choice of working sick or losing your health coverage. The kicker is that managers are trained (in the informal wink and grin style) to keep many employees' hours close to this level and use this leverage to minimize employees calling in and disrupting the business. It's a devious crock but nobody has been forced to work while ill.

  4. But I do drink it all through the day.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    one large at 8 am.
    another large at 10
    another at 12
    another at 2
    another at 4
    another at 6....

  5. Coffee or Espresso? by jchenx · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder how many people actually drink straight up coffee at their gourmet coffee shops. It's been my experience here in Seattle (home to Starbucks) that most folks are ordering lattes, caramel machiattos, mochas, etc. than a regular cup o' joe.

    --
    -- jchenx
    1. Re:Coffee or Espresso? by B1ackDragon · · Score: 5, Informative

      Just so you're aware, according to the book Espresso by Petzke and Slavin-

      "Although most people assume espresso to be as strong as in caffeine as it is in flavor and aroma, it contains less than one half to one third of the caffeine in a cup of coffee brewed from robusta beans, the cheaper coffee beans used for canned coffee. Arabica beans, the high-quality beans used for espresso, have less caffeine. The dark-roast process, which concentrates the flavor of the beans used to make an espresso blend, also has the effect of burning off some of the caffeine content, so that the darker the roast, the lower the caffeine."

      Possibly not the best source of information, but for a book dedicated to the subject of espresso, its got to be pretty near the target. And I know what you mean, a lot of people drink fancy drinks as opposed to coffee, which I think actually requires a finer taste (well until you're addicted anyway, which might be the cause of the finer taste in coffee - the fact that we keep on drinking it.)

      --
      The snow doesn't give a soft white damn whom it touches. -- ee cummings
  6. Not too plausible by jmcharry · · Score: 4, Informative

    There may be a lot of caffeine in a 20oz cup, but for an equal volume gourmet coffee should have less caffeine than the cheap stuff. The reason is that it is pure arabica, while utility grade coffee contains large amounts of robusta beans. Robustas have a lot more caffeine than arabicas. That assumes, of course, that the cheap coffee is not also brewed weaker than it should be.

  7. Or a better suggestion: by maynard · · Score: 5, Informative

    Buy a coffee roaster and green beans in bulk from Sweetmarias (I have no connection with them other than as a satisfied customer), and then buy a good espresso machine like the Rancilio Silvia, then enjoy the best damn espresso drinks in life for less than $.50 cents a shot. And who the fuck is worried about caffeine overdosing anyway? If you're heart doesn't palpitate, you haven't had enough!

  8. More caffeine just because they use more coffee? by swb · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The article seemed to indicate that because they use 2 tbsp coffee per cup brewed, you end up with more caffeine than other coffee. Is that all there is to it? "GOURMET COFFEE USES MORE COFFEE AND IS THEREFORE STRONGER." Well, duh. Insert $obligatory_canadian_intelligence_insult.

    I thought perhaps there was some conspiracy where they were doping coffee with extra caffeine or something.

  9. I like coffee by ld_hrothgar · · Score: 5, Funny

    It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion, It is by the beans of Java that thoughts acquire speed,The hands acquire shaking, the shaking becomes a warning, It is by caffeine alone I set my mind in motion.

  10. Did someone page? by blackmonday · · Score: 5, Funny

    Someone just dared to call Starbucks a gourmet coffee. Stay in your seats, the coffee nazis will be arriving in 3...2...1...

  11. Re:Arabica vs. Robusta, Dark vs. Light by JungleBoy · · Score: 4, Funny

    I find that it doesn't matter what type of beans you use, as long as you make it with Water Joe and grind up a hand full of NoDoze with the beans.

    Thats the sort of thing that gets me going... And probably leads to situations like my signature.


    -JungleBoy
    --
    "You never know when some crazed rodent with cold feet might be running loose in your pants."
    -Calvin
  12. ...but why Starbucks? by TheTXLibra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You know, I can accept a certain status-quo hatred of Seattle-area based MegaCorps like Microsoft, Barnes & Noble, and so on... They are hated, for the most part, because they have money that the haters do not. There are other reasons to be sure, but it all amounts to the fact that they represent The Man, and hating The Man is en vogue.

    Why then, do so many die-hard penguins and independant bookstore shoppers insist on supporting Starbucks? If coffee has an archetypical "The Man" figure, who has way too much money, produces shoddy goods, and destroys good quality companies with its monopoly-like tendancies, it is Starbucks. They put great coffee houses out of business, the kind that you may have met some of your best friends at. They use inferior beans, cooked at too high of a temperature, for too short an amount of time, just to increase output. That's right, you're drinking a bean that was treated worse than those poor saps on WB's Superstars.

    Why God? Why of all people, do you, "The Man"-hating intellectuals, actually give them your business?

    --
    -The Libra
    "Please be patient--The future will begin momentarily."
  13. Obligatory Plug by 4of12 · · Score: 4, Informative

    for Fair Trade Certified Coffee

    Consider choosing to pay a little extra for your coffee to encourage sustainable agriculture, preserve rainforests and help out the long term social fabric of coffee growers and their families.

    --
    "Provided by the management for your protection."
  14. Confused on daily limit by Fiz+Ocelot · · Score: 4, Informative
    "There are certain advantages to caffeine but, after 300 milligrams [daily intake], you start getting into health problems," Dr. Marcone said."

    Ok so 300 is the upper limit. But...

    Health Canada recommends that adults limit their consumption of caffeine to 400 mg daily -- the equivalent of about four small cups of coffee.

    So Canadians think it's ok to drink 33% more than is healthy? And yet, they try not to call it caffine addiction. Interesting.

    1. Re:Confused on daily limit by azav · · Score: 4, Funny

      Living above the border you have to acclimate yourself to a higher latitude. The days have less sunlight and therefore the upper limit of caffeine is higher.

      Contrary to popular belief, the effect of caffeine is not hindered by cold weather nor is the Canadian metabolism less efficient as their brethren below the border.

      It has been surmised that the greater daily beer consumption by the average Canadian may also contribute to the higher maximal dose of caffeine.

      This is a recently established medicated fact.

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  15. Caffeine withdraw (Was:Makes me wonder...) by turnstyle · · Score: 4, Interesting
    "Caffeine withdrawls suck"

    Every so often I quit coffee, just to do it.

    Rather than quit cold, and get the nasty headaches, it's a heck of a lot easier to gradually reduce -- I start with my regular level, and then the next day have a bit more than half as much, and so on for a few days, till it's just a sip.

    Or, you can quit cold and get a wicked headache for a day or so...

    --
    Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  16. Green Tea by azav · · Score: 5, Informative

    I drink about 20 Oz of green tea a day and I admit, the caffeine and other teaish goodness is liquid motivation.

    It seriously can be rocket fuel and wears off smoother than coffee does.

    The tea I use needs to be purchased specially at a Chinese tea store and is not prepackaged. It is White Dragon Pearls. Little rolled balls 1/4 of an inch in diameter with young tea leaves and flowers.

    I'll put about 40 balls in a 20 Oz glass Campbells soup jar - or a mason jar and nuke for 3:30 to 4 mins. Then let it sit till it is golden - 10 - 15 mins. Filter the Tea into another 20 Oz glass and sip away. Save the leaves because you can generally brew another batch out it this. This tea does not get bitter and you can sip it all morning and into the afternoon.

    The stuff is about 40 bucks a pound but that's about 1/2 to a whole year of tea. A bargain at any price.

    And it makes me motivated AND feel good about the world. At least till it wears off. Then it's back to my unibomber style shack and dreams about getting rid of that principal Skinner.

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
  17. Illegal coffees? by babyrat · · Score: 4, Interesting
    From the Coffee FAQ


    Is there a legal limit for caffeine content?

    The answer to that is it depends on the country. A few examples of laws related to caffeine content for food and drinks include the following:

    In the United States there is a limit of 6mg of caffeine per liquid ounce in beverages. There is also a limit of 200mg in pills such as Vivrin.

    From, article, a 20oz coffee has 400 mg of caffeine, or 20 mg/oz - so would it be illegal for Starbucks to sell that same coffee in the States?

    Who knows, maybe the coffee FAQ is wrong...but it was on the internet so it must be true!

  18. Caffeine and Medicine by TheMohel · · Score: 5, Informative
    In fact, a 20-ounce jumbo cup of house blend at Starbucks or Second Cup contains almost 400 milligrams of caffeine -- the upper limit of what Health Canada says an adult can consume healthily in a day.
    ...
    "There are certain advantages to caffeine but, after 300 milligrams [daily intake], you start getting into health problems," Dr. Marcone said.
    ...
    Problems arise, he said, when people cut back. "You develop headaches, you are irritable, you seek caffeine to relieve those adverse effects," Dr. El Sohemy said.
    ...
    Health Canada recommends that adults limit their consumption of caffeine to 400 mg daily -- the equivalent of about four small cups of coffee. The health regulator says that because of its diuretic and stimulant properties coffee can cause insomnia, headaches, irritability and nervousness.

    Okay, as a physician and a caffeine user I just have to comment. I have no idea where they came up with their 400 mg/day cutoff, but it wasn't from any published data I've seen. Public health nannies have been looking for something bad about caffeine for decades. From "It'll stunt your growth" to "it'll rot your bones" they keep looking for some reason why we shouldn't drink coffee.

    The facts, unfortunately, are quite contrary. Caffeine is a drug, albeit a very benign one. Yes, you can overdose on coffee. A truly unpleasant experience, but one that is quite survivable (in large part because coffee doesn't carry very much caffeine compared to the dangerous dosing). You can overdose on No-Doz too, and that actually is more dangerous because you'll get more in before you start feeling it. Neither, however, is seen very often in actual emergency practice (other ingestants, like alcohol or Tylenol, are MUCH more dangerous in moderate overdose).

    Caffeine increases alertness and learning. It's been reliably shown to improve test scores (especially for those of us who can't think without it). Interestingly, large public-health studies have correlated a high caffeine intake with decreased gallstones and with a markedly decreased incidence of type II diabetes, although I'm not fool enough to call it causality when I only have correlation.

    And that's it. No increased cancer risk (they checked). No increased hypertension (they checked). No increased risk of coronary artery disease (they checked). No increased risk of psychiatric disease (well, okay, I didn't actually read that one, but most of us in THIS forum came by our psychopathology in other ways anyway).

    Doctors are not the world's best source of public health information. They live lifestyles that make programmers look positively healthy (I know - I do both professionally). Still, doctors don't smoke any more (seriously - it's down to a few percent) and they don't drink to excess the way they used to. Drug use is relatively uncommon (although not unheard-of, unfortunately) and seriously frowned upon. But caffeine is ubiquitous in the hospitals and clinics, and there's a good reason. Compared to the stress of getting through the day without it, most of my colleagues share my basic view, which is that there are few Good Things in this world, but coffee is definitely one of them.

  19. Re:LARGE?!? ITS VENTI GODDAMNIT!!!! by angst_ridden_hipster · · Score: 5, Funny

    Possibly True Story, with names changed to protect the guilty:

    So a certain anonymous individual went into a Starbuck's one morning last year, a bit cranky because he had to be up earlier than usual. He spoke to the individual at the cash register...

    Anon.: I'd like a medium chai, please.

    Register Person: Do you mean tall or grande?

    Anon.: I mean medium.

    Register Person: We don't sell a size called medium.

    Anon.: "Medium" is a description, not a name. You sell three sizes. I'd like the one in the middle.

    Register Person: We call that size "grande."

    Anon.: Right.

    Register Person: So what is it you'd like?

    Anon.: I'd like a medium chai, please.

    Register Person: You mean a "grande."

    Anon.: Haven't we already been through this?

    Register Person: I just would like to be certain.

    Anon.: You can be certain I'm not going to use your ridiculous trademarked name, when a descriptive adjective completely connotes my intent.

    Register Person: It's not a ridiculous name -- it's Italian!

    Anon.: Yes, and "chai" is either Chinese or Sanskrit. What's that got to do with it? The word I want in English is "medium."

    Register Person: Dude, what have you got against Italians?

    Anon.: Nothing. Well, perhaps they bear some responsibility for Madonna, but I think she's actually from New York.

    Register Person: Bay City, Michigan, actually. That'll be $3.50.

    --
    Eloi, Eloi, lema sabachtani?
    www.fogbound.net
  20. Why Americans Like Gourmet by MidnightBrewer · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Even so, research conducted in the United States shows that gourmet coffee customers are fiercely loyal. More than one in every eight patrons of gourmet coffee shops visit four or more times a week, according to the market-research firm Mintel International Group.

    This person has obviously never drank coffee in the United States. American coffee, when not served too weak, usually tastes like battery acid (or, in culinary terms, "robusta," apparently.)

    I had to realize the article was from a Canadian paper before I could understand why they were making such a big deal over gas station and donut shop coffee being weaker. In America, that is not only the norm, it barely rates above "hot water that somebody has dipped a dirty rag in."

    People, American coffee sucks. I never knew this until I lived in Germany, where the coffee you buy in your supermarket is incredibly superior for the same price as American store-bought coffee. I had to defend American coffee to my German friends because I had no idea what they meant by our coffee being weak.

    Heck, here in Japan, they sell coffee in "regular" and "American" styles, where "American" is used synonomously with "weak." I've even had the waitress at a restaurant, unprompted, apologize to me that the only coffee they have to offer is American.

    --
    "Give a man fire, and he'll be warm for a day; set a man on fire, and he'll be warm for the rest of his life