Slashdot Mirror


SETI@home Turns Five Today

mfh writes "Five years ago today, SETI@home launched a comprehensive program to search for Extra Terrestrial life in the universe, using millions of home computers to help compile useful data that could some day lead to the discovery of advanced extra terrestrial life. Since inception, SETI@home has found 2,568 persistent Gaussians, possible radio transmissions from a distant planet. SETI began in 1960 with the efforts of Cornell University astronomer Frank Drake, whose Project Ozma became the first modern SETI experiment in history."

22 of 275 comments (clear)

  1. obligatory space balls quote by Steve_Jobs_HNIC · · Score: 5, Funny

    "we ain't found shit!"

  2. Just not on company PC's by mainfr4me · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Cool stuff, until I found one of our managers had installed it on all of the computers in his department. The boss is still upset about that one, although he does do it on his home PC's.

  3. Let's get it out of the way by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I for one welcome our new Gaussian overlords!

  4. Five years, eh? by bobhagopian · · Score: 5, Funny

    Those bastards I'm competing against have accumulated thousands of years of credits.

  5. Boring by N3koFever · · Score: 5, Funny

    I ran SETI@home for months but I got bored when I didn't find any aliens. What's the point of the game?

  6. and.. by MasTRE · · Score: 5, Funny

    In related news, ET turns 22 today

    --
    Must-not-watch TV!
  7. Re:Defect by dumeinst · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet the aliens have better computers. When we find them, they'll be able to simulate all that protein folding in SECONDS.

  8. 19638 Units and running strong by DrWily · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My friend convinced me to start running SETI on any system I came in contact with to see how they benchmark against servers we buy. Right now I run four clients on my home systems and at least three clients at work. It's been fun watching the numbers crank away and comparing our newer systems to when we started some years ago.

  9. A new project by millahtime · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe we need to redirect SETI. We should spend all computing cycles finding intelegent life in Washington.

    1. Re:A new project by gears5665 · · Score: 5, Funny

      As voters, we only have ourselves to blame.

  10. Where are the results? by maynard · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The status and update page sat nearly a year without any change until May 17th when they posted an update explaining why they haven't released any results from last year's Arecibo run. I realize it takes time to collate data. And given the very high and unpredictable latency of the their distributed processing system, I understand why it might take a long time to push data out and get results back. Still, since the project was originally slated to run two years, then extended to five, yet why have we (the public) seen so few results from this program? Even negative results would be of interest. Maybe I'm missing something here, since I don't pay very close attention to the project, but I sure would like to see more published details including core data and methodology instead of a pretty web site and irregular status updates. JMO. --M

  11. i hate to say it... by nappingcracker · · Score: 5, Interesting
    its been said before, but-

    wouldnt it be better to donate cycles to something like folding@home, parkinsons and alzheimers disease protein research?

    i dont mean to belittle seti, i think its a wonderful project, and maybe this arguement falls deaf on geek ears (aliens vs disease- woh, war of the worlds:) but id like to see more terran problems solved, no?

    ps i donate all my unused cycles to folding (over genome project, i personally feel that we're going to screw something up with the whole genetic genome geewiz junk)

    --
    |plastic....or gasoline?|
    1. Re:i hate to say it... by Stevyn · · Score: 5, Funny

      Um, the aliens have those cures. that's why we're looking for them

      DUH!

    2. Re:i hate to say it... by Dracolytch · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Having been part of seti@home for quite a while, I had thought about switching... But decided not to.

      Why does society break up into researching different things? Why shouldn't we find the #1 killer disease, focus ALL of our money at it, solve that, and move on? Sure, it's not as simple as that, but it also goes down to drive.

      We work with charities and groups that touch our lives, soul or imagination. When friends and family are stricken with a disease, we are more likely to donate to a group trying to cure that disease.

      Ultimately it comes to this: SETI is a dream that I share with the founders of the project. It's something I could see myself persuing in some other life. It's a lottery that, if you win, you don't know what the prize will be. Maybe it will re-focus our community a bit more away from commercialism, and more towards exploration and discovery. Maybe we win nothing.

      I'm in it for the journey, not the destination.

      ~D

      --
      This sig has been enciphered with a one-time pad. It could say almost anything.
  12. Aah, the memories... by Stack_13 · · Score: 5, Funny
    This reminds me of the time when I was *really* enthusiatic about Seti@home. Having a shell account on a university mainframe, I devised a clever script which launched setiathome client every night at 8 PM, and terminated them at 8 AM.

    Problem was that something went slightly wrong with the Solaris server resulting in a crash of the server. This was probably unrelated to my setiathome processes (?), but one of the memory dump files had my user ID on them. Nearly lost my privileges - luckily the university IT folks were kind enough to let me off with just a warning.

  13. Re:Defect by Martin+Blank · · Score: 5, Informative

    It's called BOINC (Berkeley Open Infrastructure for Network Computing), and it's still in beta, but progressing. I have it on one of my systems, but it's only working on one project right now. Aside from the occasional software update, I've not touched it in a month or two, so I'm not sure if they've implemented any more projects.

    --
    You can never go home again... but I guess you can shop there.
  14. Re:Defect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    20% to aliens, 80% to cancer research and 20% to medically related research
    I've dedicated 103% of my CPU time to selecting three numbers that actually add up to 100%...
  15. Re:Top Secret by mrzaph0d · · Score: 5, Funny

    what's really weird, is when you decode what they're saying it works out to "i-d-10-t", which is the same as an error code i got from the tech support desk..

    --
    this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
  16. my best gag ever. by joper90 · · Score: 5, Funny

    readining this reminds me of my best joke on a work mate ever.

    He was always forever installing bloody seti on every machine server in the building..

    So i played a joke, installed a app on his machine which at random points (i controlled) ping up and say it had found a singnal etc etc etc.. i used the seti gfx etc etc.

    He got really excited, so of course we went one stage further.. The seti app told him that the signals were getting sent off for analysis, and someone would contact him shortly.

    We then (other had now joined in) continued to make him jump out of his seat and explain "its happened again." while the rest of tried to stop laughing.

    So an spoofed email address was setup and we emailed him from seti.. told him they were getting looked at etc..

    Over the period of a couple of weeks we got the noise off the film contact, and mixed it with white noies.. luckly he had not seen contact. it started off really quite quiet in the background, and each email it got better and more and more clearer.

    It was genuis.. we couldn't stop laughing.. he was telling his friend family etc etc etc that hed discovered possible alien life contact..

    Of course.. we then relised we had gone slighly too far and had to tell him..

    he was not a happy bunny..

  17. Re:Possible radio transmission? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 5, Funny

    > Does anyone know anything more about "possible radio transmissions from a distant planet"?

    All they got so far was this:

    "Dear sentient:

    Having consulted with my colleagues and based on the information gathered from the Altair IV Chambers Of Commerce And Industry, I have the privilege to request for your assistance to transfer the sum of 47,500,000.00 (forty seven million, five hundred thousand Rigellian quatloos) into your accounts [...]"

  18. the real value of SETI by Dan+Crash · · Score: 5, Insightful

    SETI@home has been getting dissed a lot lately. "Why are you wasting your cycles on this useless project?" some geeks ask. "Why aren't you spending them predicting climate change, fighting AIDS or curing Alzheimer's? You could be saving people from anthrax, smallpox, Ebola, or SARS."

    These are all noble goals, worth pursuing. But SETI has a noble goal that doesn't get talked about very much.

    Most SETI research so far has been focused on the so-called "Water Hole", the quietest part of the radio spectrum which happens to fall between the radio spikes of hydrogen and hydroxyl, around 1.4 gigahertz. If there's another water-based civilization out there, it's easy to see that this is a logical place to broadcast or listen. (Projects like Danny Hillis' Clock of the Long Now enable me to imagine a future in which we broadcast a message of our own, someday.)

    "So what happens if you listen and you don't hear anything?" you ask. Well, even if we drain the Water Hole and find nothing, we'll still have learned a great deal from the process. We'll know there likely aren't any civilizations remotely like us in our galaxy. We'll know that previous civilizations, if there were any, were not able to sustain themselves. We'll know that intelligent life is fleeting and precious in the universe. And this should make us think hard about our own civilization.

    If we're ever forced to acknowledge that there are no intelligent radio signals in the universe, then we must also acknowledge that the odds of our own survival just became much bleaker. Knowing that space is quiet means it's more important for us to be careful than we thought. The longer we search without finding any intelligent signals, the more likely it becomes that intelligent civilization isn't some pretty 4th of July sparkler; it's nitroglycerin, waiting to explode. This is incredibly valuable knowledge, life or death knowledge that's worth going after.

    The biggest reason to look for a signal in the first place isn't to commune with E.T., but out of pure self-interest. Any number of systems failures could wipe us out as a species, from a single well-designed terrorist plague to GMOs with unforeseen environmental consequences. How do we as a society learn to play nice with technology? Has anyone else in the universe done it? If we found evidence that someone out there had, it would stand as a beacon, showing that we can probably do it, too. And if we don't find a signal, it means a bell is probably tolling our end somewhere, and we'd better think long and hard how to change that.

    So feel good about SETI. It's not just about searching for aliens, it's about searching for a cure for extinction.

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  19. Well I've found plenty of things by Sigfried_Blip · · Score: 5, Interesting

    "we ain't found shit!"

    I like noise. In fact I am fascinated by it.

    My viewpoint of the seti@home project is that they are a great source of high quality Radio Telescope signals. I let their program do it's science and I get to keep the work units. Seems like a fair trade. So far I have archived 5762 work_unit.sah files (~1.5 GB). Why?

    Because I am an amateur SETI enthusiast and I wasn't satisfied with just watching the screensaver. Gaussians, spikes, triplets, phooey! I wanted to do more. So I collect every work unit and I analyze them myself with the baudline signal analyzer. It can read the .sah data files and it has a cool auto Doppler drift algorithm, nice displays, ...

    Despite the common mixing trough at 1.4200 GHz, and the stationary harmonic bleed-in interference, I have found a lot of interesting things in the data. Every now and then I run into a weak signal with a non-terrestrial Doppler drift rate. Sometimes they wiggle or pulse. Is it ET? Probably not, but it is exciting and fun. I should make a webpage of pictures.

    [Disclaimer: Yes, I am an author of baudline and this is a blatant product plug.]