Slashdot Mirror


Sony Exits US Handheld Market

10999 writes "Today Brighthand reports that Sony will no longer develop and sell Clie handheld models to the United States market. Most certainly that means no more Clies for Europe, too."

32 of 246 comments (clear)

  1. Dumbasses by metamatic · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Well, if they hadn't removed the Bluetooth from the TH-55, I'd have bought one. *sigh*

    Now I have to wait for Palm to come up with something comparable.

    --
    GCHQ Quantum Insert installed. If only our tongues were made of glass, how much more careful we would be when we speak
    1. Re:Dumbasses by swordboy · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well, if they hadn't removed the Bluetooth from the TH-55, I'd have bought one. *sigh*

      Once again, people seem to be forgetting that Sony doesn't cater to the "one percenters" here on slashdot. The fact of the matter is that Sony probably put a lot of money into researching this decision. I bet that they've found that most of the market will be going into PDA phones and the like.

      If you haven't worked in an enterprise environment, then you haven't witnessed the dominance of Blackberries as of late. This is the future. Combined with Intel's upcoming personal server, people will have a "local replica" of all of their data to take with them. As they say in Soviet Russia, "the PC will log onto YOU". It won't matter if it isn't your PC - as long as it is "digital briefcase" compliant, it will wirelessly recognize your personal server and give you the option to log into your data set.

      Nice!

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    2. Re:Dumbasses by torpor · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Blackberries may be popular in the United States, but in the rest of the world everyone has moved on ... to smart phones.

      Of course, the convergence from PDA to phone and back again is not without its detractors...

      --
      ; -- the corruption of government starts with its secrets. a truly free people keep no secrets. --
    3. Re:Dumbasses by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You wanting something doesn't mean you're going to get it. Maybe one half of one percent of the market place cares is their PDA connects to OS X and Linux.

    4. Re:Dumbasses by uradu · · Score: 1, Insightful

      > you haven't witnessed the dominance of
      > Blackberries as of late. This is the future.

      Maybe something LIKE Blackberries, but not actual Blackberries. The company is WAY too enterprise obsessed to give a damn about average consumers. If there's a "future" in communications devices, it's more something like the Treo, a combination PDA and cell phone with GPRS or equivalent. In particular, it's got to be an open platform that can take freely or cheaply developed third party software. That's the ONLY way a platform will get enough worthwhile software. Closed platforms that lock you in to the whims of a vendor and their communications price model always tend to be extremely software deficient. Witness current multimedia enabled camera cell phones with all this horsepower and capabilities, and yet they're mostly useless for anything but good old-fashioned talking because their manufacturers and network providers haven't got a clue regarding what YOU might want to use it for, and they're certainly not going to give you the benefit of having the imagination that they themselves are lacking.

    5. Re:Dumbasses by jhobbs · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The BlackBerry is popular because it is NOT a computing device. The people using them are most certainly not the Slashdot crowd. They are white collar professionals in an enterprise enviroment. The dozen or so of my friends that carry them have few computer skills and are managers and such at various companies. Also, amoung my friends, none of them chose thier blackberry. They were given one by thier company so they would have a cell phone and now also company email whereever they are. The PDA market is still so small, outside of tech circles few people actually use them. As far as smart phones go, everyone over the age of 45 that I have shown one to got that deer-in-the-headlights oh-god-not-more-technology look. There is a reason LG is making a killing selling monochrome phones with only a couple cheesy games and an addressbook.

  2. Re:I won't miss it Sony did not keep promise by MoronGames · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I feel the exact same way! I bought an NR70, expecting to be able to use the new mem sticks when they came out, but, no! I'm stuck with 128mb sticks. Same goes for my nice cybershot camera.

    Come back when your products will do what they should.

    --
    hey!
  3. Japanese have all the best toys by pubjames · · Score: 4, Insightful


    In my recent visit to Japan, I saw loads of technology that isn't in the US yet. Why is this? Yes, I know that it is stuff that is manufacturered by Japanese companies and so it is natural that it should appear there first, but Japan seems to be the best stuff several years before the US. Is the USA not a good market for tech gadgets?

    The miniature laptops I saw just rocked, and I can't believe they wouldn't sell in the US.

    1. Re:Japanese have all the best toys by bw5353 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "It's outrageous if you really think about it. Both that the US tech sector is not trying to fight back harder, and that we're still giving business to comapnies that are giving other customers better products for no other reason other than that they are Japaneese."

      I wouldn't use the word "outrageous". It's simply the reality that the US cannot be best at everything. HiTech phones from Nokia and SonyEricsson usually appear in Finland and Sweden before they appear in the US. The US is mostly ahead the rest of the world when it comes to some things (arguably: Apple, IBM, Palm, Microsoft, burgers) but not everything (cars, phones, vacuum cleaners perhaps?).

      In Europe we have for a long time travelled from one European country to another to find cheaper, better or simply more interesting products than we find at home. But if I buy a German car, that doesn't mean I want to taste their coffee, and if I buy Italian shoes, that does not mean I want to use their phone system.

  4. Battery too small for wireless by tburt11 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    All of the handhelds that I have evaluated do not have a long enough battery life to be useful.

    A full time radio connection (wifi is an example) requires significant power resources.

    Handhelds don't have the power.

    The small Sony laptops are more appropriate. They have a useable keyboard, and they almost fit in a jacket pocket

    1. Re:Battery too small for wireless by biglig2 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      For goodness sake, there may be no significant change in your usage, but the hardware needs enormously extra ammounts of power! You've got a 320x320x65K color screen in it for one thing, even before we start to talk about the vastly increased RAM and CPU speed.

      --
      ~~~~~ BigLig2? You mean there's another one of me?
    2. Re:Battery too small for wireless by perly-king-69 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Obviously. Surely the point being that battery technology is lagging behind other hardware developments.

      --

      --
      This sig is inoffensive.

  5. Handhelds are dead! by midifarm · · Score: 4, Insightful
    I think the handwriting's been on the wall on this one for quite a while. It's become more mainstream to carry your laptop around and or your cell phone has the ability to store all your addresses and such. I've stopped using mine about a year ago in favour of my iPod. Granted I have to enter everything via my computer, but that doesn't bother me too much. I don't feel the need to carry around another $400 device just so I can have the luxury of scribbling in a name or two in my device on the fly. RIP PDA's, we loved when you were around!

    Peace

  6. Are they moving to another horizon? by Clinoti · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I think with the recent developments in Mobile phones technology, smartphones and other types of PCDs (personal communication devices), Sony may be staying their hand for entry into another concept or approach to this market.

    Their exit is extremely strange, but until we get more corroborating articles, I'm going to stick to that thought.

    --

    Let's keep in mind that patents are in place to keep lawyers employed and keep them litigating. -CatGrep

  7. Pocket PC slowly winning? by janaagaard · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Do you see this as a clear sing, that Microsofts Pocket PC is slowly winning the PDA operating system war? Or is it just that Sony couldn't turn Palm OS in to the media OS it wanted? Or perhaps something else?

    1. Re:Pocket PC slowly winning? by cosmo7 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Do you see this as a clear sing, that Microsofts Pocket PC is slowly winning the PDA operating system war?

      It shows that Sony is ahead of Microsoft in the PDA market. Sony has now caught up with Apple.

    2. Re:Pocket PC slowly winning? by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      There hasn't been a really new Pocket PC in, what, a year? More? Since HP got out of the handheld market in their own right and passed the HP name to their new beaux Compaq?

      In 2002 the better Pocket PC had 32-64M of RAM, one or two flash card slots, and a processor between 200 and 400 MHz, with a 320x240 transflective display. In 2004 the Pocket PC has, what, 64M of RAM, 1-2 flash card slots, a processor between 200 and 400 MHz, and a 320x240 transflective display... and some models have bluetooth and/or wifi.

      Even the Macintosh has a more aggressive roadmap than that!

    3. Re:Pocket PC slowly winning? by argent · · Score: 2, Insightful

      it was Compaq who made the iPAQs in the first place

      I know, and they put the HP name on the iPaq and abandoned their own Pocket PC, the Jornada... which was a much better design and had come from behind to almost parity in market share with the iPaq when they pulled the plug on them.

      In fact the big increase in market share in 2002 that lead to to the Pocket PC finally breaking 20% was due entrely to sales of the Jornada.

      the processor power of the Pocket PCs where already enough

      A 400 MHz XScale is not enough to run many modern video codecs, it's not enough to run interpreted and scripted software (javascript, java, or flash) at full speed. Microsoft and their licensees have held back the Pocket PC OS to keep it a kind of an annex of the PC, with files downloaded to the PC, transcoded to low-performance codecs or stripped down formats, and ActiveSynced to the Pocket PC.

      My Jornada 568 has more CPU power and RAM than my old laptop, and while that old P133 can't play DVDs or streaming video it *does* run a full scale version of Word 6 and Excel, and I could share files directly with people. There is no reason they couldn't have produced a Pocket PC like the recent half-VGA Linux-based Zaurus or the clamshell Sonys, and it wouldn't need to be a clamshell design to be usable thanks to the excellent quality character recognition in Pocket PC 2002.

      The latest machines are a little faster, but they're not capable of going it alone without a desktop or a laptop to provide life support. That role was passed on to the bulky "Tablet PC".

      I should have read the writing on the wall in 2000 when Microsoft spent half of "Mobius Zero" -- the PPCWB shindig -- talking about the tablet PC and smartphones instead of the Pocket PCs they were supposedly showing off... and stuck with Palm instead of wasting four years trying to make a go of it with the Jornada 548 and 568.

      Since the Compaqtion of the Jornada line, I've been looking for a Pocket PC to upgrade to... and for the past 2 years there hasn't been one that's really any better than the Joranad 568.

      Now I've "downgraded" to a Sony SJ22, and with Sony getting out of the market I'll probably be able to get a really good price on a TH55 by the end of the year... and since Palm does a good job with backwards compatibility I'll be able to use most of my software *despite* going from a Dragonball (68000) to an ARM... instead of having to start over from scratch with the 548 to 568 upgrade...

  8. Due to the rise of next generation mobile phones by Master+Of+Ninja · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The next generation mobile phones are really what killed the PDA. If you have seen the high end phones some are PDA like (Sony Ericsson P900), and even the medium range now has very good organiser and synchronisation facilities. Combine that with Java expandability and there is not much need for PDAs for most people.

  9. Steering clear of corporate market by Zaffo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When you think about it, Sony's never been into the corporate market. They're all about multimedia and entertainment, hence the upcoming PSP media handheld. PDAs have their most functional benefits in business applications. I could defnitely see them taking their Clié R&D environment and redirecting it to the market they know best: entertainment.

  10. PDAs are transitional devices anyway by btharris · · Score: 3, Insightful

    i think the handheld pda as we have known it has really just been a tranistional device anyway. its purpose, as history may remember it, was to bridge the gap into more versatile devices such as what mobile phones are becoming (and have become already). the major features of newer pdas are wireless networking capabilities such as bluetooth, 802.11, etc. but what about the most well-established and well-known networking capability of them all---the telephone? now that's wireless. just use that.

    of course i think it's rather sad to see such a well designed line of products come to an end (i personally have a sony clie), but surely sony is aware of the larger issues. the newest coolest thing they came out with was the UX-50, which when i first looked at it, i thought of it as a sub-sub-notebook. it just runs Palm OS and you can't upgrade any of the hardware. for the cost (US$600) you could easily get a bad-ass mobile phone that does all you'd need anyway---and it's a phone.

  11. Palm too much of a pain for them by dekeji · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I have owned a number of Clies and still use one as my handheld. Sony has done a spectacular job with the hardware on many of them. They also tried really hard with the software, but ultimately, they ran into too many limitations with PalmOS.

    For example, Clies ship with PicselViewer, an image and PDF viewer that lets you read and view normal image and PDF files off memory sticks, and it's actually pretty fast. Clies also ship with applications that let you back up your data to external flash memory, that let you manage your files. In the latest version, they tried to revamp the aging and somewhat limited Palm PIM applications.

    But doing any of this under PalmOS is really hard. PalmOS is essentially still a single-tasking OS with a quirky window system, severe limitations on memory management, little protection of applications from one another, and a lousy desktop synchronization architecture.

    And things keep changing even between minor PalmOS versions in weird ways: Bluetooth support, configuration applications, datebook record formats, etc. And Sony always ended up behind Palm--for example, the T3 ships with a lot of nice functionality that didn't make it into the TH-55. It must have been a nightmare for Sony.

    Ultimately, I suspect Palm was just too much of a pain for them and they didn't like playing second fiddle to Palm. I don't expect Sony to get out of the handheld market long-term, I think they'll just switch to some other platform--PocketPC, Linux, or Symbian, maybe.

  12. Probably a good thing by anjrober · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I'm a bit torn by this but overall this is a good thing. I have had many, many Sony PDAs over the years. I used an NX70V for a long time and really enjoyed it. However, as a developer, the Sony devices were a royal pain in the ass. The UI was painful to deal with. Their OS4 devices were a disaster, again, from the independent developer POV. They did move the ball forward though. They will be missed.

  13. Market Slump by Wog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Even the article suggests that the trimming of the PDA field was not unexpected, given the flat sales. And the reason is made clear by talking to PDA shoppers or even looking at this thread: Everyone is fine with what they've got.

    I'd be freaking lost without my PDA. I used a Palm 3 that I was given for a little while, then bought the Visor Deluxe when it came out, and used it until just recently. When it finally died (backlight failed) I dropped $90 on a Clie SJ-22. It's a great little PDA with a very bright white backlight that's on by default, 16meg memory, reads memory sticks, etc. I'll use it until it dies some horriffic death (hopefully in a few years) and get whatever is simple, cheap, highly-reviewed and well-supported.

    I guess the point I'm trying to make is that people use these things primarily for their original purpose: to *organise things.* The vast majority of PDA users might *like* color screens, mp3 playback, cameras, etc. But when they get to talking about it, you soon understand that they still mostly just want it to keep their lives in order. It's interesting that even many one-percenters on /. seem to be the same way. I love new tech just like anyone else, but it's a lot cheaper for me to play with the neat gizmos seperately, and not have my mishaps affect my PDA. Any other thoughts?

    1. Re:Market Slump by aallan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      But when they get to talking about it, you soon understand that they still mostly just want it to keep their lives in order. It's interesting that even many one-percenters on /. seem to be the same way. I love new tech just like anyone else, but it's a lot cheaper for me to play with the neat gizmos seperately, and not have my mishaps affect my PDA. Any other thoughts?

      My PDA is totally critical, I've got everything in there. While I backup regularly and use iSync to keep everything synchronised with my Mac Powerbook, I don't carry the Powerbook everywhere. The PDA I carry everywhere. I don't want a PDA that's flaky, adding "stuff" like camera's and do-das makes the OS flaky (look at any recent Nokia phone and compare it's stability to the older models). I want something to keep my calenda and my address book in, and work out my milage and expenses. I don't want something to play MP3's...

      Al.
      --
      The Daily ACK - Eclectic posts by yet another hacker
  14. If so, they're shooting themselves in the foot. by Thag · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The PSP is going to be the Game Gear all over again. Size and battery life will kill it.

    If Sony took down their Clie operations in order not to "compete with PSP," that only means in two years they'll be out two revenue streams.

    Jon Acheson

    --
    All opinions expressed herein are my own, and not those of my employers, who are appalled.
  15. Re:Probably going to focus on PSP. by blueZhift · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I agree, given the aggressive launch schedule Sony is trying to follow for the PSP (fall 2005 US I think), shifting resources to PSP makes sense. It wouldn't be surprising if a lot of the Clie people were working on PSP too.

    It is also likely that the PSP has a far greater profit potential than the Clie too. For the Clie they only get money on hardware and probably not too much since they have to pay PalmOS licensing fees along with competing with a dozen or so other PDAs. For PSP, they will likely lose money on the hardware but more than make it up in royalties paid by game publishers for the system. If Nintendo's success in the handheld console market is an indicator, then PSP could make some major dough for Sony.

    As for battery life, etc..., with the Clie people working on PSP, I like their chances. They've got experienced, talented people and a clear target and path laid out by current portable king, Nintendo. So on the whole, I think dropping Clie to focus on PSP is a good bet. This isn't Game Gear again by any means. Sony has far greater resources than Sega ever did and has shown that they know how to fight in the games market.

  16. LCDs? by muel · · Score: 3, Insightful

    wait wait wait - you're on to something, but you're missing the A1 numero uno priority for Sony to do this. Let's follow the train of the latest news in portable hardware, shall we?

    Sony wants to claim a huge stake in the handheld gaming market, and they know that the opening sales of the PSP will be pretty indicative of how the console will do down the line. Big launch will mean big boost in reputation, and then more third parties to develop for the PSP, more sales, yadda yadda.

    However, this article points to a huge possible dent in all systems portable this year due to a tighter supply of LCD screens. the linked article talks about Nintendo, I know, but it still drives the point home: Sony has to prioritize its allocation of LCDs, and it has to do so ASAP.

    Pretty big judgment call on Sony's part to give up a decent PDA marketshare in order to go full-force on the PSP. But, then again, considering how much $ they can pull not only with PSP sales, but also games, music and movies (many of which will come directly from Sony studios/records/etc), it seems like Sony has quite a forward-looking financial plan, and this move to re-allocate LCDs is proof positive of such forward-looking. Even if the additional movie/music stuff doesn't lift off in the States, Europe and Japan are ripe for such sales, so don't scoff at that notion too quickly.

  17. H E L L O M O D E R A T O R S ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    where are y'all?

  18. Re:Due to the rise of next generation mobile phone by Outatime · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's still a significant market out there for people who don't want the do-everything phone. I bought a Clie TJ-25 because it is a great book reader, calendar, and electronic notepad. And it was cheap--I bought just the features I wanted (no MP3 player, camera, etc.)

    It is a mistake to assume that everyone wants a phone-pda-camera-mp3 player-fm radio-refrigerator. (Well, not refrigerator.) Too much integration leads to unused features (==bloat) and wasted money. How many people buy Microsoft Office just to use Word? You'd be surprised.

  19. Re:why carry more than one thing? by aussersterne · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why carry (and recharge every night) two pocket-size electronic devices when you can carry just a single one that does both?

    Because a PDA should have a screen large enough to be useful. But that means that you may not want to carry it around all the time-- when you go on vacation, for example, or if you're just making a run to the convenience store for a twelve-pack. But of course you do want to carry your phone around all the time. Most phones right now will easily fit in a pants pocket unintrusively enough that you can jog or take a nap on a couch with them on your person. But a usably-sized PDA? Not really.

    A headset? What if you're talking to someone about something and you need to pass the conversation for a moment to your friend, standing next to you? Much easier with a traditional form phone factor. What if you're backing up a full PDA and flash card and you want to make a phone call or go somewhere while you wait for the backup to complete?

    What about battery life? Generally, you want your phone to be on all the time... but you don't want your PDA on unless you're using it, in order to maximize battery life. You've had a heavy day using your PDA at work and the battery is almost gone, but luckily work is almost over and you're going out with friends right afterward, you just need to call them to arrange a meeting place... d'oh! Battery dead, no phone all evening, unless you go home first and charge your PDA. Or feel free to reverse the scenario.

    As usual, the integration of two devices means significant compromises for both.

    --
    STOP . AMERICA . NOW
  20. my Clie was the best palm-based PDA I ever had by getnuked · · Score: 1, Insightful
    I was in the market for a new PDA a couple of months ago (my palm M100, purchased a 2 years ago was getting a little light on RAM at only 2MB!). Anyway, being a follower of palm technology I was excited to get a new tungsten E. However upon arriving at a local tech store I soon realized how awful the unit was. It had a cheap large plastic body, that was contoured (hello, this is supposed to fit in your pocket!). Although the sales dude was proud to show that he had one, it had scratches on the fake chrome paint exposing the cheap-o plastic body - what a demo!

    Anyway I scoured around the shop and came across the Clie TJ25 - what a beauty! This was the first PDA I had seen (in the sub $200 price range) with a metal shell and beautiful color screen! I was a little hesitant about the 'memory stick' (I prefer more 'open' technologies like SD or CF), yet I found some cheap 128 MB sticks at tigerdirect (which were actually lower in cost per MB than SD/CF).

    Anyway, I was really hoping to upgrade in a year or so to a new wireless/camera/MP3 Clie. Now I guess it will happen sooner than later because of the price drops as stores dump their Clie inventory. However it will be a sad day when the Clie is removed from the PDA lineup - one less great choice for those choosing palm! I just really hope we don't see Sony jump ship to the ms wince camp in a year or two!