Slashdot Mirror


The Mathematics of Futurama

mclearn writes "Did you know that the writers of Futurama have a collective set of degrees that would rival most think tanks? Here is a hilarious site on the mathematics of Futurama -- specifically this article (pdf). The same authors have also researched the mathematics of the Simpsons, mentioned on Slashdot long ago."

73 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. Smart? by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 3, Funny

    Smart enough to NOT get cancelled?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Smart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly, it was more like "too smart to stay on the air." See, American television viewers don't like television shows that make them feel stupid. Instead of watching intelligent, well-written shows like Futurama, they instead watch unintelligent pablum like "American Idol."

      It's things like this that make me turn to the Internet, great liberator of properly smart programmes that were cancelled before their time.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Doesn't Own Television

    2. Re:Smart? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 5, Funny

      Instead of watching intelligent, well-written shows like Futurama

      Is this the same Futurama where the lead character went back in time and had sex with his grandmother?

    3. Re:Smart? by tdemark · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean "did the nasty in the past-y".

      - Tony

    4. Re:Smart? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's Fox's fault. Futurama kept on being pre-empted by sports, moved around and basically becoming a programming ragdoll for Fox. The same thing happened to Family Guy, they had less episodes made (50, compared to Futurama's 75) and they are coming back on the air. Some buzz is going around that Futurama could share in the same fate, it's possible because Fox doesn't own the rights to Futurama like they do with Family Guy. Groening and Co. just made episodes and Fox paid them to show them on Fox.

      I've watched extensive hours of The Simpsons, Futurama and Family Guy and I've come to this conclusion...

      The Simpsons is the series with the biggest environment. Have you seen the picture with about 200 people from The Simpsons on it? They mix humor with a wide spectrum of different characters and get a great show.

      Futurama has the best writing, hands down, no question about it. You listen to the commentary of why certain elements were in it, and you think to yourself "wow, that's pretty sneaky". Plus, the seamless blend of computer animation and hand-drawn animation by Rough Draft Korea makes it the best animated series.

      Family Guy has the best jokes IMO. Family Guy doesn't hold punches when they lay down jokes. The Simpsons has their funny jokes, Futurama has smart jokes, but Family Guy has gut-busting jokes that go to new heights. The only thing I'd change is put Lacey Chabert back as the voice of Meg, when I hear Mila Kunis' whiny voice, I think of Jackie, not Meg.

    5. Re:Smart? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Informative
      The episode had nothing to do with "title flaws", I mean, the guy literally went back in time and had sexual intercourse with his grandmother.

      The "grandfather paradox" (what if I went back in time and killed my grandfather - thus my father would never be born, thus I would never exist, thus I couldn't go back in time and commit the murder, so my grandfather would live, so my father would be born, so...) is a sci-fi cliche. Their take on it was great!

      Fry, trying to protect his "grandfather", ends up killing him, only to be seduced by his grandmother (believing, in his half-witted way, that since his "grandfather" is dead, his grandmother can't really be his grandmother) and becomes his own grandather. It's gross, it's ironic, it's funny.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
  2. Degrees? by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me guess... masters degrees in folklore and mythology?

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:Degrees? by finkployd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, executive producer David Cohen has a B.S. in computer science from U.C. Berkeley, and a B.A. in physics from Harvard.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:Degrees? by ZX-3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > executive producer David Cohen has a B.S. in computer science from U.C. Berkeley

      In one of the DVD commentaries, he talks about an Apple ][ videogame he programmed in assembly.

    3. Re:Degrees? by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was once part of an ill-fated theatre group, that had the misfortune of having a director with a Bachelors degree in Folklore from (yes) harvard.

      He was remarkably like the owner of the Android's Dungeon, except drunker and more into the Dead.

      He actually used the word "tripsidaisical" in a conversation with some financers. They were charmed until he pulled a beer from his coat pocket and opened it during the 10:00 am meeting.

    4. Re:Degrees? by ParisTG · · Score: 4, Informative

      I guess that explains why Bender is based on the 6502 cpu!

  3. Set of degrees that would rival most think tanks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Translation: One of the writers has a bachelors in political science.

  4. /.'ed already. by Stitch_626 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bed they didn't calculate that!!!

    sorry....

    --
    Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten.
    1. Re:/.'ed already. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another application of the uncertainty principle. How do you know if the site is /.ed if don't click the link. But when you click the link you chance the process, since your click might be the one that caused the /. effect.
      Now how do I get that damn cat hooked up?

    2. Re:/.'ed already. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Schrödinger's Cat was a thought experiment to demonstrate that the uncertainty principle could have macroscopic effects.

      The uncertainty principle dictates that you can't measure something without influencing it (e.g. a thermometer's reservoir doesn't have the same temperature as the liquid you're measuring and therefore will change the temperature a little bit).
      My example means you can't (remotely) "measure" if a webserver is still operating, without sending a datapacket to it. If the server was already at the very edge of its capabilities, your ping could push it over the edge and /. it. Doesn't that qualify as influencing your "measurement"?

    3. Re:/.'ed already. by jcoleman · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that you can know either the position or velocity of a subatomic particle, but not both. Further refined, the better you estimate velocity, the worse your estimate of position and vice versa.

      Schroedinger's Cat, however, illustrates the wavefunction of a quantum particle...the cat is either alive or dead, but you can't know which until you check. Whether you look or not doesn't influence the cat's mortality rate. You can say that it's the measurement (opening the box) that causes the cat to live or die, but the cat already was in that state when you checked. That is the essential problem raised by this thought experiment.

      Check this page:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%F6dinger%27s_c at

      and note that the word "uncertainty" does not appear. Of course, it might appear on the page, and it might not...you won't know until you click on it. ;)

      So your analogy holds between the webserver and the cat, but the uncertainty principle is not involved. That is what I'm trying to clarify.

      (BTW, this is a stupid argument. Clearly we are both bored at work.)

  5. SLURM by livhan28 · · Score: 5, Funny

    theres nothing like a tall glass of SLURM while your waiting for a /.'ed page to load.

    1. Re:SLURM by aslate · · Score: 5, Informative

      How about going to the Google Cache whilst you enjoy your alien-worm excrement!

    2. Re:SLURM by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Informative

      And here is a link to the cache of the PDF itself, for the truly lazy

      --
      Why not fork?
  6. It was obvious to me... by scorp1us · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Farnsworth said at the horse track when his horse lost in a photo finish:
    "No fair! you changed the outcome by measuring it."

    It was that day that I knew that Futurama was for me, since I figure the vast majority of casual viewers watching it would not have a clue. The fact that they thew a quantum computing reference out there that would be above 99% of the viewers told me this show was different, and it was for me. It takes balls to do jokes that the majority of people won't get. And that earns my respect...
    That and the numerous Rush references...

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:It was obvious to me... by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...about from this point:

      "Here. Take my +1 Mace."

    2. Re:It was obvious to me... by Maudib · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fact that they thew a quantum computing reference

      Quantum computing? Sure I guess quantum computing may take advantage of such properties, but this phenominon is part of quantum mechanics writ large, not just computing.

    3. Re:It was obvious to me... by devorama · · Score: 5, Funny
      The gang goes to visit the edge of the universe. It's one of those tourist activities that you never get around to. There is a telescope looking out into the empty expanse. Fry looks into the telescope and sees a mirror image of his entire group, except everyone has a beard, as in Star Trek's evil Spock. Fry asks who they are, and Prof. Farnsworth tells him it's another universe.

      Fry: "Are there an infinite number of universes?"

      Prof. F.: "No, just the two."

    4. Re:It was obvious to me... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 5, Funny
      One of my favorites (paraphrased):

      Why, thats over 200 atmospheres of pressure!

      How many atmospheres of pressure can the ship withstand, Professor?

      Well, its a spaceship. So anywhere between zero and 1.

    5. Re:It was obvious to me... by hchaos · · Score: 3, Funny
      The highly intelligent, prog-rock trio or the pill-scarfing Bloat-O-Pundit?

      But Alex Lifeson is a member of Rush!

      Oh, wait....

    6. Re:It was obvious to me... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What about when he used his super X-Ray gun (I forget what it's called...) to look inside of Bender's head and it showed a 6502 CPU?

      To quote this site:

      The key component of the NES system is the MOS 6502 CPU. This is the main processor where the game's code is executed. This CPU was very popular in the 1980's where it was used in some of the first personal computers including the Commodore 64, Apple II, and the Atari systems.


      I thought that was hilarious, but most others I've spoken to have completely missed the joke, even if they did see the "6502" number.
    7. Re:It was obvious to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It takes balls to do jokes that the majority of people won't get."

      Not really, because the majority of people wouldn't have realized that the geek-joke even existed.

      But that also highlights the sophistication of their jokes because the jokes are not only selective in who-gets-it, but also who-hears-it.

      To the ones who don't get it, it's just filler-dialogue, which is smart since it wont alienate or insult the intelligence of viewers who don't get-it.

  7. Google Cache by amembleton · · Score: 3, Informative

    The site seems to be slashdotted.

    Here is Googles' Cache.

  8. 10 SIN by FerretFrottage · · Score: 5, Funny

    20 GOTO HELL

    The show made me hurt with laughter so many times while the wife looked at me like I'm an ID10T. Well maybe I am, but the show made it clear why you shouldn't use GOTO statements.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    1. Re:10 SIN by Rune+Berge · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. That is one of my favourites!
      Bender also had the following framed on the wall in one episode:
      10 HOME
      20 SWEET
      30 GOTO 10

    2. Re:10 SIN by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's not forget Bender's nightmare...

      Bender: "Ahhh, what an awful dream. Ones and zeroes everywhere... and I thought I saw a two."
      Fry [comforting]: "It was just a dream, Bender. There's no such thing as two."

      Who would've thought they could make a show with lots of binary jokes in it and still make it the funniest thing on TV?

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    3. Re:10 SIN by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Informative

      On a similar note, but a bit more subtle is Bender's apartment number: 00100100

      (that's a '$', for the non-ASCII literate)

    4. Re:10 SIN by SamSim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best is in that haunted house, when he sees that someone has written a number in blood on the wall.

      "01011100101? What does it mean, Bender?"
      "Nothing, it's gibberish. [catches sight of the mirror image and screams] 1010011010?! Ahhhhhh!"

      1010011010 being 666 in binary. I also seem to recall him being pursued by a flying toaster and the Windows logo as he flees in terror.
  9. Mirror by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

    holy crap that was fast. Site's basically dead after 10 comments. I'm trying to get a mirror up at:
    http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~pnelson/www.mat hsci.appstate.edu/%257Esjg/simpsonsmath/futuramama th/
    So far I have the index page and a few pictures, but they'll go up as I get them.

  10. Maths & magic by doodlelogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This all reminds me of the old saying that at its most advanced, mathmatics is indistinguishable from magic.

    All those lovely Escher pictures similarly show the ways in which selective use of mathmatics & physics can create imaginary worlds that, while they could not necessaily occur in reality, "feel" realistic.

    Another magical view of the future was the original Futurama Exhibit at the World's Fair .

  11. My favourite show by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it got cancelled. Typical.

    If the creators of Futurama decided to strike out on their own and sell episodes of the show on the Internet, I'd definitely buy them.

    I can only hope.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  12. The problem by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    With all of the smart people making the show it only leaves dumb people to cancel the show!

  13. Easy by Sebby · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Take 1 great show
    + Run it a few years
    + At the height of it's popularity: cancel it
    ---
    = Fox Network

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Easy by schapman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the ??? is easy to figure out: 4: Release dvd sets of all the seasons and generate renewed interest in show then bring back on air!

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    2. Re:Easy by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Close, but this is more accurate:

      1. Take one Great Show that will have a built-in initial audience because of who's creating it, and stick it in the Time Slot Of Doom.
      2. Watch Great Show continually get pre-empted by NFL football, but do little to nothing to ensure that Great Show can be seen by fans at a regular day and time. Bounce Great Show around in your schedule like a pinball.
      3. Totally ignore the creator of Great Show, who's Previous Great Show almost single-handedly saved your network in it's early years.
      4. Wonder why Great Show just can't seem to get any ratings. Cancel Great Show because it's cheaper to run Previous Great Show reruns in the Time Slot Of Doom.

      The hell with Fox. There was a time that they were a pretty kick ass network, but like every other network they've fallen into the pit of Reality TV. Futurama deserves to be on Cartoon Network.

    3. Re:Easy by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, they're pretty dumb. Isn't it an amazing coincidence that they're as successful as the other major networks which have been around much longer?

      Come on. I loved Futurama and I loved Firefly, and I'm pissed that they were canceled, but I can't paint it as a bad business decision. This very article (about the advanced math in the show) makes the point that it didn't really appeal to the mainstream viewer. "Mainstream" may translate to "those slack-jawed idiots who can't even code in C" in your mind, but in the coffers at a TV network "mainstream" means "the main stream of our revenue - large numbers of people who like the same stuff". And I don't think that "the height of its popularity" was ever that high. It's a big hit with geeks, but most of the non-geeks I know aren't interested or don't seem to "get it".

      Personally, I think the problem is that there is no way for people to pay different amounts for shows. When you watch network TV, you're paying with your eyes. Number of viewers determines their advertisers, and that's where they make the money. That means that a mediocre show, which will mildly appeal to everyone, is more profitable than a show which will be deeply loved by a small group of people. If the compensation was somehow better differentiated, I think we'd get better shows.

      No, I don't actually have a good system of differentiated compensation to propose, short of buying the canceled shows on DVD. Sorry.

  14. Masters in Math by smartiq2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I recall correctly, one of the main writters had a masters in mathematics.

    It is interesting to listen to the commentary tracks on the dvd's. For example, in "Roswell that ends well", Fry (one of the main characters) ends up going back in time and accidently kills his grandfather. While consoling his grandmother, he ends up in bed with her and thus becomes his own grandpa allowing the future to remain "intact".

    On the commentary tracks, they get into this large discussion about how they tried to find the steady state solution for the amount of DNA in Fry that was pure, and they ended up working on it for quite some time. In the end, they give an email address and ask the public for the solution.

    Then they got into a large discussion on the causality of time and how they should only time travel forward.

    Good stuff.

    1. Re:Masters in Math by calypso15 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ken Keeler has a PhD in Applied Math and a Masters in Electrical Engineering.
      David Cohen has a bachelors in Physics and a Masters in Computer Science.
      Bill Odenkirk has a PhD in Inorganic Chemistry.
      Jeff Westbrook has a PhD in Computer Science.
      J. Burns has a bachelors in Mathematics.

      Ryan

  15. Re:bit torrent? by JamesO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy the DVDs, cheapskate. Lots of people worked hard to make Futurama happen, and you want a freebie. How can you justify that?

  16. Mathematical significance of 1729 by Tree131 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1729
    When Srinivasa Ramanujan, the great Indian mathematician, was ill with tuberculosis in a London hospital, his colleague G. H. Hardy went to visit him. Hardy, trying to initiate onversation, said to Ramanujan, "I came here in taxi-cab number 1729. That number seems dull to me which I hope isn't a bad omen."

    "Nonsense," replied Ramanujan. "The number isn't dull at all. It's quite interesting. It's the smallest number that can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different ways." (Ramanujan recognized that 1729 = 13 + 123 as well as 93 + 103.)

    Copied from here
    I guess it was worth the 5 minutes I spent searching for it.

    1. Re:Mathematical significance of 1729 by SamSim · · Score: 5, Informative

      Erm, neither 13, 123, 93 or 103 are cubes. What you mean is 1729 = 1000 + 729 = 1728 + 1, or 1729 = 10^3 + 9^3 = 12^3 + 1^3.

    2. Re:Mathematical significance of 1729 by Rupert · · Score: 3, Informative
      Erm, what you missed is that slashcode eats unprotected carets. Undoubtedly what Tree131 meant to post was
      (Ramanujan recognized that 1729 = 1^3 + 12^3 as well as 9^3 + 10^3)
      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
  17. Re:bit torrent? by slaker · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate to be a twit, but in this one case I'm gonna say it:
    Buy the DVDs!

    The show was funny and deserves the support of its fans.

    Man, I'll copy DVDs of crappy Hollywood movies I get from Netflix all day long, but those TV Show boxed sets I buy the day they come out. 20 or so hours of entertainment for $50 (or $20 on ebay). They seem like a pretty good deal to me.

    I've come to the conclusion that the only way that anyone will make more TV I'd actually like to watch is if I spend money on the things that have been produced already. They wouldn't keep making Star Trek crap if people weren't buying the old stuff.

    All that said, I see at least the entire first season on suprnova.org right now.

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  18. Speaking of math.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bender: I need a calculator.
    Fry: You are a calculator.
    Bender: I need a good calculator.

  19. 1729 by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 3, Informative

    > "Well, sure. For example, Bender's serial number is 1729, a historically significant integer to mathematicians everywhere; that "joke" alone is worth six years of grad school, I'd say."

    For us non-math-geeks here's a bit on 1729

    Among other things "It is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  20. It's ParaBOX by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But yes, what an amazing episode.

    One of my favourite scenes is the hippie universe:

    Freakworth: "Dig it! All of you fitting in this box is like, seriously freaked up."
    Farnsworth: "Nonsense! Why, there's a whole universe in there."
    Freakworth: "Dude. There's a universe in all of us."
    Freak Amy: "Right on, professor Freakworth."
    [Professor Freakworth proffers a flower to Professor Farnsworth]
    Farnsworth: "Get a job!"

    WHY FOX WHYYYYY?????

    There are murmurs that Matt G is trying to resurrect Futurama on the Cartoon Network... let us pray that it is so.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
  21. Lesson This Teaches by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get an advanced degree in mathematics or physics, and you will come up with the idea to put "St. Pauli Exclusion Principle" on a six-pack of beer in a cartoon, and only a few geeks who like to stay up and watch Adult Swim last night will get the joke.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  22. Re:my lead pipe hurts! by Cthefuture · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's my favorite Futurama episode. I like the ones where Fry kicks ass (the Devil's Hands one is good too).

    What a great show. It had a bad time slot and was probably too geeky for mainstream. In fact, I was part of the problem. I didn't even watch it very much when new shows were coming out. I had this "Simpsons wannabe" attitude and thought the show was OK, but nothing special. It was only years later that I discovered how great the show actually is.

    3D animation, technical references galore, very funny.

    I almost fell out of my chair when on that one episode there were a bunch of aliens (invaders or something?) coming out of a spaceship making all sorts of arcade references and such, then one goes "All your base are belong to us!"

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
  23. Re:A vision of the future.... by mog007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Aliens wiping out the earth was in the pilot episode. When Fry is in the cyro tube it shows the world being destroyed by flying saucers, then being rebuilt to around a bronze age and being destroyed again. I think it was mainly a satire of The Time Machine.

  24. Re:bit torrent? by GarfBond · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There's more to this than one realizes. DVDs are almost the sole indicator to the distributor of how much demand there is for a TV show. Ever wonder how/why Family Guy is being brought back? It's because the DVD sales of that show were phenomenal. All those sales said to Fox "maybe this show actually *is* popular."

    If you like Futurama enough to want to see it come back, then buying the DVD is basically the only way to prove to Fox that it's worth it. It tells them a) you love the show and b) you love the show enough to spend good money on it. That last one is probably the more important bit.

    Personally, I think the slightly geekier audience of Futurama vs Family guy didn't help its dvd sales; geeks are probably more willing to search out for Bittorrents/kazaa/emule/gnutella of a show, while the mass market is content with dvds.

  25. 1729 by marksilverman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article refers to 1729 being "a historically significant integer to mathematicians everywhere". If you're not a mathematician, 1729 is Ramanujan's number -- the smallest natural number that can be written as a sum of cubes in two different ways:

    1^3 + 12^3 9^3 + 10^3

  26. If you want an obscure reference - Samurai Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a Samurai Jack episode, a town folk is telling Jack there's two roads ahead of him.

    Jack: "Which road leads to the Dragon's Lair?"
    Town folk: "The left one."
    Jack: "Where does the other road lead?"
    Town folk: "Space Ace."

    If THAT ain't obscure I don't know what is.

    I was still laughing 15 minutes after that, though. :-)

    P.S.: If you didn't get that one, the keyword here is "laserdisc games".

  27. Re:Set of degrees that would rival most think tank by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 3, Informative

    RTFA, please.

    David X. Cohen, Batchelors in Math, Harvard; Masters ComSci, Berzerkeley
    Ken Keeler, PhD in Applied Math and Masters in EE
    Bill Odenkirk, PhD in Inorganic Chem
    Jeff Westbrook PhD in ComSci
    J. Stewart Burns, Batchelors in Math, Harvard; Masters in Math Berkeley

    Perhaps a bit more hard-sciency than the PolSci asshats that populate the average Think Tank.

  28. Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Good news everyone, we're getting 500 visitors per second!"

  29. Re:Set of degrees that would rival most think tank by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...aaaand I'm a choad and totally missed your joke. Glad I could post that in the blinding fog of my unearned self-regard.

  30. Aleph-null plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite reference was when the gang went to the movies, and it was an "Aleph-null plex". That is, the number of movie theaters was countably infinite. How horribly dorky!

    --
    Gary

  31. Let the quotes begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite futurama quote of all time:

    Fry: Oh my god!
    Bender: Oh your god.

  32. Re:did the network give a reason by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, but it had to be done:

    Me lose brain cells? Ha ha ha ha.... why I laugh?

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  33. Re:Quote from the Simpsons by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Informative

    HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

    I never laughed so hard during the Simpsons as when I heard the guy say that.

    For a recap, they're talking about how a certain cliff is popular for being used in suicides. And a geek (sounded like the Krusty-Burger fry cook shouts as he's leaping: "Why did they Cancel Futuramaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!?????"

    I think that was a good dig by Groening. Fox really shafted them from the beginning. I think he even said so much in an interview.

    Man, I miss Futurama. I think I'm gonna watch the DVD's again when I get home tonight.

  34. geeks by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew the very first episode that these people were geeks when Bender was drinking liquid FORTRAN.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  35. Re:bit torrent? by realdpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Futurama isn't coming back, but it could tell Fox that their audience enjoys funny "mature" cartoons (mature as in not kid stuff, but not XXX either).

    Of course, nobody should buy any DVD expecting it to count as a "vote" for their favorite show. Buy it if you want it. Don't expect something to come of it. :)

  36. Funniest moderation ever : ) by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

    10 HOME
    20 SWEET
    30 GOTO 10

    (Score:0, Redundant)


    Redundant indeed ;-)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  37. Another ultra-obscure cartoon joke by Indomitus · · Score: 3, Funny

    From 'Pinky & The Brain'

    Brain: Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

    Pinky: Oh, I think so Brain, but SNOBOL for Windows?

    SNOBOL is an early-60s era programming language. The only reason I caught that joke was one of my professors mentioned it offhand the day I saw that episode. I am forever impressed by the writers of P&tB because of this quote.

  38. Re:my lead pipe hurts! by pappy97 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I had this "Simpsons wannabe" attitude and thought the show was OK, but nothing special. It was only years later that I discovered how great the show actually is."

    You discovered that you would like the show, not that it is great. Futurama is for geeks. It is smart in a "Geek" sort of way. The Simpsons is smart, but you don't have to be a Slashdotter to get the stuff.

    Face reality: You were right the first time, sort of. I wouldn't call it a Simpsons wannabe, but rather "Simpsons in the Future" or

    "Slashdot Simpsons."

    There is nothing special unless you are a geek. That's why Futurama won't come back. It *only* appeals to geeks (like "Firefly," but better).

  39. First Episode by Jbrecken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recently, CN reran the first episode, and I noticed that you could actually see Nibbler's shadow before Fry falls into the cryochamber.
    If anyone has the first episode as originally aired, was the shadow always there, or did they edit that into the scene for syndication after they did the episode with the brains?

    If it was always there, I'm seriously impressed with the planning that went into the story arc.

    1. Re:First Episode by max+cohen · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was always there.

      Wonderful, isn't it?

  40. Sum Of Two Cubes by tadmas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the activity sheet:

    Bender: Hey robot, what's your serial number?
    Flexo: 3370318.
    Bender: No way! Mine's 2716057.
    [They both laugh. Then Fry laughs, but stops and looks confused.]
    Fry: I don't get it.
    Bender: We're both expressable as the sum of two cubes.
    Flexo: Woooh!

    In the DVD commentary, David Cohen goes on to say that it's tricky to find the cubes. Well, he's right. Here's the trick, in case you were interested:

    3370318 = 119^3 + 119^3
    2716057 = 952^3 + (-951)^3

    No one ever said the cubed numbers had to be positive.... and yes, I'm a dork for working this out!

  41. Its never coming back by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep hoping. The animation quality on that show does not come cheap. Do you remember the ill-fated return of The Critic in Flash? It was terrible. If you cant afford good animators you can't afford good writers. You need x amount of capital to get the ball rolling and I believe Fururama was VERY expensive, moreso than the Simpsons.

    Time is also against the Futurama fans, whatever "synergy" the creative team had has changed. Its simply not feasible to expect them to suddenly do high-quality work again from such a long hiatus, and thats assuming you can even get all the people.

    Production is a very odd thing, when there's a good team they do good work. There are probably two to three episodes of Futurama which I think are low quality and the rest are really just gems. The problem is the network idiots didn't know they were holding a diamond and wouldnt give them a consistant timeslot.

    Ideally, the Simpsons should have been cancelled after the first season of Futurama and Futurama would have taken its place. There's only so much you can do with the Simpsons and its simply been done, over and over. Futurama would have given Fox a new platform to create comedy and sell lots of commercials

    They dropped the ball, and here we are. Expect the Simpsons to become a horrible shell of what it used to be (many will say its already happened) and a sad "had it coming" cancelation instead of a proud exit.