Slashdot Mirror


The Mathematics of Futurama

mclearn writes "Did you know that the writers of Futurama have a collective set of degrees that would rival most think tanks? Here is a hilarious site on the mathematics of Futurama -- specifically this article (pdf). The same authors have also researched the mathematics of the Simpsons, mentioned on Slashdot long ago."

122 of 481 comments (clear)

  1. Smart? by SpanishInquisition · · Score: 3, Funny

    Smart enough to NOT get cancelled?

    --
    Je t'aime Stéphanie
    1. Re:Smart? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Sadly, it was more like "too smart to stay on the air." See, American television viewers don't like television shows that make them feel stupid. Instead of watching intelligent, well-written shows like Futurama, they instead watch unintelligent pablum like "American Idol."

      It's things like this that make me turn to the Internet, great liberator of properly smart programmes that were cancelled before their time.

      Sincerely,
      Seth Finklestein
      Doesn't Own Television

    2. Re:Smart? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 5, Funny

      Instead of watching intelligent, well-written shows like Futurama

      Is this the same Futurama where the lead character went back in time and had sex with his grandmother?

    3. Re:Smart? by Seek_1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      if only I had mod points.. :) (funny!!)

    4. Re:Smart? by tdemark · · Score: 5, Funny

      I think you mean "did the nasty in the past-y".

      - Tony

    5. Re:Smart? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I was going to expend some mod points on this discussion, but this deserves a reply instead.

      You can use those relative titles ("niece", "uncle", "sisters-brother", etc...) and prove that you are your own grandfather. I don't know exactly the way to prove it, I can't seem to quickly find information through Google, but I know it's been done. It's a flaw in the whole relative title system. It just shows that him going back and becoming his own grandfather is another proof of Futurama's quality writing.

    6. Re:Smart? by Cereal+Box · · Score: 2

      I think you're giving the writers a bit too much credit. The episode had nothing to do with "title flaws", I mean, the guy literally went back in time and had sexual intercourse with his grandmother. The show is intelligent, sure, but that particular plotline is not what I would consider the height of intelligent writing.

    7. Re:Smart? by LighthouseJ · · Score: 5, Interesting

      That's Fox's fault. Futurama kept on being pre-empted by sports, moved around and basically becoming a programming ragdoll for Fox. The same thing happened to Family Guy, they had less episodes made (50, compared to Futurama's 75) and they are coming back on the air. Some buzz is going around that Futurama could share in the same fate, it's possible because Fox doesn't own the rights to Futurama like they do with Family Guy. Groening and Co. just made episodes and Fox paid them to show them on Fox.

      I've watched extensive hours of The Simpsons, Futurama and Family Guy and I've come to this conclusion...

      The Simpsons is the series with the biggest environment. Have you seen the picture with about 200 people from The Simpsons on it? They mix humor with a wide spectrum of different characters and get a great show.

      Futurama has the best writing, hands down, no question about it. You listen to the commentary of why certain elements were in it, and you think to yourself "wow, that's pretty sneaky". Plus, the seamless blend of computer animation and hand-drawn animation by Rough Draft Korea makes it the best animated series.

      Family Guy has the best jokes IMO. Family Guy doesn't hold punches when they lay down jokes. The Simpsons has their funny jokes, Futurama has smart jokes, but Family Guy has gut-busting jokes that go to new heights. The only thing I'd change is put Lacey Chabert back as the voice of Meg, when I hear Mila Kunis' whiny voice, I think of Jackie, not Meg.

    8. Re:Smart? by NatasRevol · · Score: 2, Informative
      --
      There are two types of people in the world: Those who crave closure
    9. Re:Smart? by Mr.+Slippery · · Score: 4, Informative
      The episode had nothing to do with "title flaws", I mean, the guy literally went back in time and had sexual intercourse with his grandmother.

      The "grandfather paradox" (what if I went back in time and killed my grandfather - thus my father would never be born, thus I would never exist, thus I couldn't go back in time and commit the murder, so my grandfather would live, so my father would be born, so...) is a sci-fi cliche. Their take on it was great!

      Fry, trying to protect his "grandfather", ends up killing him, only to be seduced by his grandmother (believing, in his half-witted way, that since his "grandfather" is dead, his grandmother can't really be his grandmother) and becomes his own grandather. It's gross, it's ironic, it's funny.

      --
      Tom Swiss | the infamous tms | my blog
      You cannot wash away blood with blood
    10. Re:Smart? by SengirV · · Score: 2, Funny
      Is this the same Futurama where the lead character went back in time and had sex with his grandmother?

      Why yes, yes it is

      V
      V
      V
      V

      --

      Prof. Farnsworth - "Oh a lesson in not changing history from Mr I'm-My-Own-Grandpa!"

    11. Re:Smart? by Vertex+Operator · · Score: 2, Informative

      By symmetry each of his grandparents (not
      including himself) must have contributed 1/3
      of his genetic information.

      And that be the way it 'tis.

      --
      San Diego Padres, 100 Park Blvd, San Diego CA 92101

      It is pitch black. You are likely to be eaten by
    12. Re:Smart? by gnu-generation-one · · Score: 2, Insightful

      "American television viewers don't like television shows that make them feel stupid"

      Another theory is that American television viewers who agree to track their own TV usage for the ratings don't watch intelligent TV shows...

  2. Degrees? by kneecarrot · · Score: 4, Funny

    Let me guess... masters degrees in folklore and mythology?

    --

    I always save my last mod point to mod up a good troll. You people are too serious.

    1. Re:Degrees? by finkployd · · Score: 4, Informative

      Well, executive producer David Cohen has a B.S. in computer science from U.C. Berkeley, and a B.A. in physics from Harvard.

      Finkployd

    2. Re:Degrees? by ZX-3 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      > executive producer David Cohen has a B.S. in computer science from U.C. Berkeley

      In one of the DVD commentaries, he talks about an Apple ][ videogame he programmed in assembly.

    3. Re:Degrees? by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 4, Funny

      I was once part of an ill-fated theatre group, that had the misfortune of having a director with a Bachelors degree in Folklore from (yes) harvard.

      He was remarkably like the owner of the Android's Dungeon, except drunker and more into the Dead.

      He actually used the word "tripsidaisical" in a conversation with some financers. They were charmed until he pulled a beer from his coat pocket and opened it during the 10:00 am meeting.

    4. Re:Degrees? by ParisTG · · Score: 4, Informative

      I guess that explains why Bender is based on the 6502 cpu!

  3. Set of degrees that would rival most think tanks? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Translation: One of the writers has a bachelors in political science.

  4. /.'ed already. by Stitch_626 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bed they didn't calculate that!!!

    sorry....

    --
    Ohana means family. Family means nobody gets left behind or forgotten.
    1. Re:/.'ed already. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 5, Funny

      Another application of the uncertainty principle. How do you know if the site is /.ed if don't click the link. But when you click the link you chance the process, since your click might be the one that caused the /. effect.
      Now how do I get that damn cat hooked up?

    2. Re:/.'ed already. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      "I'm sorry, your fingers are too fat to type. If you wish to order a special dialing wand please mash the keyboard with your palm... now"

    3. Re:/.'ed already. by Rei · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tour guide: "And now we have entered Heisenberg's bedroom. Over in the corner is his bed. We know that he slept right there, although we don't know just how fast asleep he was."

      --
      "Who the hell is Nietzche? It's a question stupid people are asking." -- Newscaster, "Jesus Christ Supercop"
    4. Re:/.'ed already. by jcoleman · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Schroedinger's Cat is not an illustration of the uncertainty principle, nor is your example.

    5. Re:/.'ed already. by Patrik_AKA_RedX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Schrödinger's Cat was a thought experiment to demonstrate that the uncertainty principle could have macroscopic effects.

      The uncertainty principle dictates that you can't measure something without influencing it (e.g. a thermometer's reservoir doesn't have the same temperature as the liquid you're measuring and therefore will change the temperature a little bit).
      My example means you can't (remotely) "measure" if a webserver is still operating, without sending a datapacket to it. If the server was already at the very edge of its capabilities, your ping could push it over the edge and /. it. Doesn't that qualify as influencing your "measurement"?

    6. Re:/.'ed already. by jcoleman · · Score: 5, Informative

      The Heisenberg Uncertainty Principle says that you can know either the position or velocity of a subatomic particle, but not both. Further refined, the better you estimate velocity, the worse your estimate of position and vice versa.

      Schroedinger's Cat, however, illustrates the wavefunction of a quantum particle...the cat is either alive or dead, but you can't know which until you check. Whether you look or not doesn't influence the cat's mortality rate. You can say that it's the measurement (opening the box) that causes the cat to live or die, but the cat already was in that state when you checked. That is the essential problem raised by this thought experiment.

      Check this page:

      http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schr%F6dinger%27s_c at

      and note that the word "uncertainty" does not appear. Of course, it might appear on the page, and it might not...you won't know until you click on it. ;)

      So your analogy holds between the webserver and the cat, but the uncertainty principle is not involved. That is what I'm trying to clarify.

      (BTW, this is a stupid argument. Clearly we are both bored at work.)

  5. proof by Andorion · · Score: 2, Funny

    Maybe they can put those degrees to good use and write a proof on the Slashdot Effect? They should have collected plenty of data right about now...

    ~Berj

  6. SLURM by livhan28 · · Score: 5, Funny

    theres nothing like a tall glass of SLURM while your waiting for a /.'ed page to load.

    1. Re:SLURM by aslate · · Score: 5, Informative

      How about going to the Google Cache whilst you enjoy your alien-worm excrement!

    2. Re:SLURM by CableModemSniper · · Score: 3, Informative

      And here is a link to the cache of the PDF itself, for the truly lazy

      --
      Why not fork?
  7. /.ed a university already? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    HAH.

    Of course, appstate.edu ranks up there with Zeb's College of Learnin'.

  8. It was obvious to me... by scorp1us · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Since Farnsworth said at the horse track when his horse lost in a photo finish:
    "No fair! you changed the outcome by measuring it."

    It was that day that I knew that Futurama was for me, since I figure the vast majority of casual viewers watching it would not have a clue. The fact that they thew a quantum computing reference out there that would be above 99% of the viewers told me this show was different, and it was for me. It takes balls to do jokes that the majority of people won't get. And that earns my respect...
    That and the numerous Rush references...

    --
    Slashdot's rate-of-post filter: Preventing you from posting too many great ideas at once.
    1. Re:It was obvious to me... by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 5, Funny
      ...about from this point:

      "Here. Take my +1 Mace."

    2. Re:It was obvious to me... by destinedforgreatness · · Score: 2, Informative

      'The Farnsworth Paradox' is proof that Futurama is too good for mainstream viewing.
      An work of genius unappreciated by an audience forever presented with reality tv nobrainer shows.
      "I've been as dumb as Fry"
      "No I'm doesn't!"

    3. Re:It was obvious to me... by Maudib · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The fact that they thew a quantum computing reference

      Quantum computing? Sure I guess quantum computing may take advantage of such properties, but this phenominon is part of quantum mechanics writ large, not just computing.

    4. Re:It was obvious to me... by devorama · · Score: 5, Funny
      The gang goes to visit the edge of the universe. It's one of those tourist activities that you never get around to. There is a telescope looking out into the empty expanse. Fry looks into the telescope and sees a mirror image of his entire group, except everyone has a beard, as in Star Trek's evil Spock. Fry asks who they are, and Prof. Farnsworth tells him it's another universe.

      Fry: "Are there an infinite number of universes?"

      Prof. F.: "No, just the two."

    5. Re:It was obvious to me... by iocat · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You have to figure, though, that there are scores of jokes in Futurama that you don't get, or even notice, because they target different groups on the nerd/pop-culture spectrum.

      --

      Dude, I think I can see my house from here.

    6. Re:It was obvious to me... by CrazyTalk · · Score: 5, Funny
      One of my favorites (paraphrased):

      Why, thats over 200 atmospheres of pressure!

      How many atmospheres of pressure can the ship withstand, Professor?

      Well, its a spaceship. So anywhere between zero and 1.

    7. Re:It was obvious to me... by October_30th · · Score: 2, Funny
      Prof. F.: "No, just the two."

      On the commentary track someone, don't remember who, points out that while there are only two parallel universes there is actually an infinite number of perpendicular ones.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    8. Re:It was obvious to me... by hchaos · · Score: 3, Funny
      The highly intelligent, prog-rock trio or the pill-scarfing Bloat-O-Pundit?

      But Alex Lifeson is a member of Rush!

      Oh, wait....

    9. Re:It was obvious to me... by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What about when he used his super X-Ray gun (I forget what it's called...) to look inside of Bender's head and it showed a 6502 CPU?

      To quote this site:

      The key component of the NES system is the MOS 6502 CPU. This is the main processor where the game's code is executed. This CPU was very popular in the 1980's where it was used in some of the first personal computers including the Commodore 64, Apple II, and the Atari systems.


      I thought that was hilarious, but most others I've spoken to have completely missed the joke, even if they did see the "6502" number.
    10. Re:It was obvious to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      "It takes balls to do jokes that the majority of people won't get."

      Not really, because the majority of people wouldn't have realized that the geek-joke even existed.

      But that also highlights the sophistication of their jokes because the jokes are not only selective in who-gets-it, but also who-hears-it.

      To the ones who don't get it, it's just filler-dialogue, which is smart since it wont alienate or insult the intelligence of viewers who don't get-it.

    11. Re:It was obvious to me... by Ukonu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Making a joke obscure and about technology doesn't make it sophisticated.

    12. Re:It was obvious to me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I preferred the slightly subtler DnD joke a bit earlier, during the introductions:

      "Hi, I'm Gary Gygax. I'm...."

      rolls dice and checks result

      "... pleased to meet you."

  9. Google Cache by amembleton · · Score: 3, Informative

    The site seems to be slashdotted.

    Here is Googles' Cache.

  10. 10 SIN by FerretFrottage · · Score: 5, Funny

    20 GOTO HELL

    The show made me hurt with laughter so many times while the wife looked at me like I'm an ID10T. Well maybe I am, but the show made it clear why you shouldn't use GOTO statements.

    --
    "Look Lois, the two symbols of the Republican Party: an elephant, and a fat white guy who is threatened by change."
    1. Re:10 SIN by Rune+Berge · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I agree. That is one of my favourites!
      Bender also had the following framed on the wall in one episode:
      10 HOME
      20 SWEET
      30 GOTO 10

    2. Re:10 SIN by aslate · · Score: 2

      There's a lot of debate about that though as it'll give:
      HOME
      SWEET
      HOME
      SWEET
      HOME ...

      Should it read:
      10 HOME
      20 SWEET
      30 HOME
      40 GOTO 10
      But that makes it less funny.

    3. Re:10 SIN by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Let's not forget Bender's nightmare...

      Bender: "Ahhh, what an awful dream. Ones and zeroes everywhere... and I thought I saw a two."
      Fry [comforting]: "It was just a dream, Bender. There's no such thing as two."

      Who would've thought they could make a show with lots of binary jokes in it and still make it the funniest thing on TV?

      --
      Read Pynchon.
    4. Re:10 SIN by FuzzyBad-Mofo · · Score: 5, Informative

      On a similar note, but a bit more subtle is Bender's apartment number: 00100100

      (that's a '$', for the non-ASCII literate)

    5. Re:10 SIN by cynical · · Score: 2, Funny
      10 HOME
      20 SWEET
      30 GOTO 10

      My wife actually made one of these samplers for our house -- it is displayed proudly on our entryway wall.

    6. Re:10 SIN by ChristianBaekkelund · · Score: 2, Funny

      Everyone's forgetting the best math joke in the series...at one point when Fry and Amy were making out in the broom closet, behind them are two books:

      "P" and "NP"

    7. Re:10 SIN by SamSim · · Score: 5, Funny

      Best is in that haunted house, when he sees that someone has written a number in blood on the wall.

      "01011100101? What does it mean, Bender?"
      "Nothing, it's gibberish. [catches sight of the mirror image and screams] 1010011010?! Ahhhhhh!"

      1010011010 being 666 in binary. I also seem to recall him being pursued by a flying toaster and the Windows logo as he flees in terror.
  11. Mirror by Rufus211 · · Score: 4, Informative

    holy crap that was fast. Site's basically dead after 10 comments. I'm trying to get a mirror up at:
    http://www.contrib.andrew.cmu.edu/~pnelson/www.mat hsci.appstate.edu/%257Esjg/simpsonsmath/futuramama th/
    So far I have the index page and a few pictures, but they'll go up as I get them.

    1. Re:Mirror by mahbidness · · Score: 2, Informative

      The meat is in the PDF. Here's a freecached link hosted on my old school account.

      --

      "It is a solemn thought: dead, the noblest man's meat is inferior to pork."

  12. google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    link to PDF
    -=no karma whoring=-

  13. Maths & magic by doodlelogic · · Score: 4, Interesting

    This all reminds me of the old saying that at its most advanced, mathmatics is indistinguishable from magic.

    All those lovely Escher pictures similarly show the ways in which selective use of mathmatics & physics can create imaginary worlds that, while they could not necessaily occur in reality, "feel" realistic.

    Another magical view of the future was the original Futurama Exhibit at the World's Fair .

    1. Re:Maths & magic by geoffspear · · Score: 2, Informative

      That was technology, not mathematics.

      --
      Don't blame me; I'm never given mod points.
  14. Site is already dead by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 2, Funny
    dead on an .edu server? should make for some happy admins.

    here is my own .edu sacrifice to this great subject!

    FuturaMath

  15. My favourite show by Progman3K · · Score: 4, Insightful

    And it got cancelled. Typical.

    If the creators of Futurama decided to strike out on their own and sell episodes of the show on the Internet, I'd definitely buy them.

    I can only hope.

    --
    I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
    1. Re:My favourite show by Progman3K · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Cancelled meaning they are no longer producing new episodes.

      Unless you know something I don't (entirely possible).

      I know there were talks about some other network picking up the show, but I don't know what became of it.

      I've bought the first three seasons on DVD, and this is AFTER downloading all the episodes on the Internet!

      The DVDs have better picture quality, of course, and bonus material, most of which I loved the commentaries; it must be the best job in the world to work with that crew!

      --
      I don't know the meaning of the word 'don't' - J
  16. The problem by Digitus1337 · · Score: 5, Funny

    With all of the smart people making the show it only leaves dumb people to cancel the show!

    1. Re:The problem by strike2867 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm current wearing a t-shirt that says: Never underestimate the power of stupid people in large groups.

      --

      Vote for new mod!!! Score:-2,Imbecile
  17. Easy by Sebby · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Take 1 great show
    + Run it a few years
    + At the height of it's popularity: cancel it
    ---
    = Fox Network

    --

    AC comments get piped to /dev/null
    1. Re:Easy by Space_Nerd · · Score: 2, Funny

      No no no
      This is slashdot, so you must phrase that as a cliche.

      Here, ill do it for you:
      Step 1: Take one great show
      Step 2: Run it a few years
      Step 3: At the height of it's popularity, cancel it
      Step 4: ????
      Step 5: More profit for Fox Network

      There, that's better now isn't it?

      --
      Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
    2. Re:Easy by phaze3000 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Quite frankly I wish more shows did this.

      IMO there's nothing worse than a show which is long past its prime being flogged like a dead horse. All the great comedy series are great because they stopped before they got bad - Fawlty Towers, Seinfeld, The Office.

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    3. Re:Easy by schapman · · Score: 4, Interesting

      the ??? is easy to figure out: 4: Release dvd sets of all the seasons and generate renewed interest in show then bring back on air!

      --
      Wouldnt you like to be a pepper too?
    4. Re:Easy by jayhawk88 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Close, but this is more accurate:

      1. Take one Great Show that will have a built-in initial audience because of who's creating it, and stick it in the Time Slot Of Doom.
      2. Watch Great Show continually get pre-empted by NFL football, but do little to nothing to ensure that Great Show can be seen by fans at a regular day and time. Bounce Great Show around in your schedule like a pinball.
      3. Totally ignore the creator of Great Show, who's Previous Great Show almost single-handedly saved your network in it's early years.
      4. Wonder why Great Show just can't seem to get any ratings. Cancel Great Show because it's cheaper to run Previous Great Show reruns in the Time Slot Of Doom.

      The hell with Fox. There was a time that they were a pretty kick ass network, but like every other network they've fallen into the pit of Reality TV. Futurama deserves to be on Cartoon Network.

    5. Re:Easy by Geoff-with-a-G · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Yeah, they're pretty dumb. Isn't it an amazing coincidence that they're as successful as the other major networks which have been around much longer?

      Come on. I loved Futurama and I loved Firefly, and I'm pissed that they were canceled, but I can't paint it as a bad business decision. This very article (about the advanced math in the show) makes the point that it didn't really appeal to the mainstream viewer. "Mainstream" may translate to "those slack-jawed idiots who can't even code in C" in your mind, but in the coffers at a TV network "mainstream" means "the main stream of our revenue - large numbers of people who like the same stuff". And I don't think that "the height of its popularity" was ever that high. It's a big hit with geeks, but most of the non-geeks I know aren't interested or don't seem to "get it".

      Personally, I think the problem is that there is no way for people to pay different amounts for shows. When you watch network TV, you're paying with your eyes. Number of viewers determines their advertisers, and that's where they make the money. That means that a mediocre show, which will mildly appeal to everyone, is more profitable than a show which will be deeply loved by a small group of people. If the compensation was somehow better differentiated, I think we'd get better shows.

      No, I don't actually have a good system of differentiated compensation to propose, short of buying the canceled shows on DVD. Sorry.

    6. Re:Easy by SamSim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Perhaps more to the point, Cartoon Network deserves Futurama. It's the only American TV network I've yet to hear anything bad about. Man, if CN got the Simpsons too, you'd never have to change channel.

  18. google cache by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    A google.com cache link.

    Take care.
    K3n.

  19. Masters in Math by smartiq2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If I recall correctly, one of the main writters had a masters in mathematics.

    It is interesting to listen to the commentary tracks on the dvd's. For example, in "Roswell that ends well", Fry (one of the main characters) ends up going back in time and accidently kills his grandfather. While consoling his grandmother, he ends up in bed with her and thus becomes his own grandpa allowing the future to remain "intact".

    On the commentary tracks, they get into this large discussion about how they tried to find the steady state solution for the amount of DNA in Fry that was pure, and they ended up working on it for quite some time. In the end, they give an email address and ask the public for the solution.

    Then they got into a large discussion on the causality of time and how they should only time travel forward.

    Good stuff.

    1. Re:Masters in Math by calypso15 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Ken Keeler has a PhD in Applied Math and a Masters in Electrical Engineering.
      David Cohen has a bachelors in Physics and a Masters in Computer Science.
      Bill Odenkirk has a PhD in Inorganic Chemistry.
      Jeff Westbrook has a PhD in Computer Science.
      J. Burns has a bachelors in Mathematics.

      Ryan

    2. Re:Masters in Math by Trigun · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've gotta get a tivo so I can watch it before 11 at night

      Well, in lines of me being a pedantic asshole, you're watching it after 11, unless your Tivo can record the future.

      Just to test, can you record this weekends lottery numbers and post them? I want to cover all bases here.

  20. Re:bit torrent? by JamesO · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Buy the DVDs, cheapskate. Lots of people worked hard to make Futurama happen, and you want a freebie. How can you justify that?

  21. Mathematical significance of 1729 by Tree131 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1729
    When Srinivasa Ramanujan, the great Indian mathematician, was ill with tuberculosis in a London hospital, his colleague G. H. Hardy went to visit him. Hardy, trying to initiate onversation, said to Ramanujan, "I came here in taxi-cab number 1729. That number seems dull to me which I hope isn't a bad omen."

    "Nonsense," replied Ramanujan. "The number isn't dull at all. It's quite interesting. It's the smallest number that can be expressed as the sum of two cubes in two different ways." (Ramanujan recognized that 1729 = 13 + 123 as well as 93 + 103.)

    Copied from here
    I guess it was worth the 5 minutes I spent searching for it.

    1. Re:Mathematical significance of 1729 by SamSim · · Score: 5, Informative

      Erm, neither 13, 123, 93 or 103 are cubes. What you mean is 1729 = 1000 + 729 = 1728 + 1, or 1729 = 10^3 + 9^3 = 12^3 + 1^3.

    2. Re:Mathematical significance of 1729 by Rupert · · Score: 3, Informative
      Erm, what you missed is that slashcode eats unprotected carets. Undoubtedly what Tree131 meant to post was
      (Ramanujan recognized that 1729 = 1^3 + 12^3 as well as 9^3 + 10^3)
      --

      --
      E_NOSIG
  22. Re:bit torrent? by slaker · · Score: 4, Informative

    I hate to be a twit, but in this one case I'm gonna say it:
    Buy the DVDs!

    The show was funny and deserves the support of its fans.

    Man, I'll copy DVDs of crappy Hollywood movies I get from Netflix all day long, but those TV Show boxed sets I buy the day they come out. 20 or so hours of entertainment for $50 (or $20 on ebay). They seem like a pretty good deal to me.

    I've come to the conclusion that the only way that anyone will make more TV I'd actually like to watch is if I spend money on the things that have been produced already. They wouldn't keep making Star Trek crap if people weren't buying the old stuff.

    All that said, I see at least the entire first season on suprnova.org right now.

    --
    -- I wanna decide who lives and who dies - Crow T. Robot, MST3K
  23. Speaking of math.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bender: I need a calculator.
    Fry: You are a calculator.
    Bender: I need a good calculator.

  24. 1729 by Strange+Ranger · · Score: 3, Informative

    > "Well, sure. For example, Bender's serial number is 1729, a historically significant integer to mathematicians everywhere; that "joke" alone is worth six years of grad school, I'd say."

    For us non-math-geeks here's a bit on 1729

    Among other things "It is the smallest number expressible as the sum of two cubes in two different ways."

    --

    Operator, give me the number for 911!
  25. It's ParaBOX by caitsith01 · · Score: 5, Funny

    But yes, what an amazing episode.

    One of my favourite scenes is the hippie universe:

    Freakworth: "Dig it! All of you fitting in this box is like, seriously freaked up."
    Farnsworth: "Nonsense! Why, there's a whole universe in there."
    Freakworth: "Dude. There's a universe in all of us."
    Freak Amy: "Right on, professor Freakworth."
    [Professor Freakworth proffers a flower to Professor Farnsworth]
    Farnsworth: "Get a job!"

    WHY FOX WHYYYYY?????

    There are murmurs that Matt G is trying to resurrect Futurama on the Cartoon Network... let us pray that it is so.

    --
    Read Pynchon.
    1. Re:It's ParaBOX by Have+Blue · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The problem with resurrecting it on Cartoon Network is that Futurama's 2D-CG hybrid style is very, very expensive to produce (at least several million per episode). CN doesn't have that kind of money; just look at most of their homegrown shows. The only thing they've done that matches Futurama's quality is the Clone Wars cartoons, and that was a single half-hour of animation and almost certainly done with Lucas's financial backing.

    2. Re:It's ParaBOX by ePhil_One · · Score: 2, Interesting
      The problem with resurrecting it on Cartoon Network is that Futurama's 2D-CG hybrid style is very, very expensive to produce (at least several million per episode).

      That just seems amazingly doubtful. The pilot might have cost that much, to develop the style, etc., but to wrap simple cartoon textures on 3-D objects sounds pretty cheap these days. Far cheaper than paying animators to hand paint, arrange, and photograph thousands of animation cells...

      --
      You are in a maze of twisted little posts, all alike.
    3. Re:It's ParaBOX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Get the hell off of our website!

  26. Lesson This Teaches by istartedi · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Get an advanced degree in mathematics or physics, and you will come up with the idea to put "St. Pauli Exclusion Principle" on a six-pack of beer in a cartoon, and only a few geeks who like to stay up and watch Adult Swim last night will get the joke.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  27. Re:my lead pipe hurts! by Cthefuture · · Score: 4, Interesting

    That's my favorite Futurama episode. I like the ones where Fry kicks ass (the Devil's Hands one is good too).

    What a great show. It had a bad time slot and was probably too geeky for mainstream. In fact, I was part of the problem. I didn't even watch it very much when new shows were coming out. I had this "Simpsons wannabe" attitude and thought the show was OK, but nothing special. It was only years later that I discovered how great the show actually is.

    3D animation, technical references galore, very funny.

    I almost fell out of my chair when on that one episode there were a bunch of aliens (invaders or something?) coming out of a spaceship making all sorts of arcade references and such, then one goes "All your base are belong to us!"

    --
    The ratio of people to cake is too big
  28. Quote from the Simpsons by T-Keith · · Score: 2, Funny

    teen: Why did they cancel Futurama?!

    1. Re:Quote from the Simpsons by kannibal_klown · · Score: 4, Informative

      HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!

      I never laughed so hard during the Simpsons as when I heard the guy say that.

      For a recap, they're talking about how a certain cliff is popular for being used in suicides. And a geek (sounded like the Krusty-Burger fry cook shouts as he's leaping: "Why did they Cancel Futuramaaaaaaaaaaa!!!!!?????"

      I think that was a good dig by Groening. Fox really shafted them from the beginning. I think he even said so much in an interview.

      Man, I miss Futurama. I think I'm gonna watch the DVD's again when I get home tonight.

  29. Re:A vision of the future.... by mog007 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Aliens wiping out the earth was in the pilot episode. When Fry is in the cyro tube it shows the world being destroyed by flying saucers, then being rebuilt to around a bronze age and being destroyed again. I think it was mainly a satire of The Time Machine.

  30. Easy... by Animaether · · Score: 2

    Same way they could justify it for :
    1. Linux distros
    Whether they only use a small part of their bandwidth, or the whole thing, their ISP bill isn't going to get any higher. So might as well download the thing for free rather than getting the boxed set CD / DVD in the mail ... which costs money. Of course the hundreds of users doing so may drive up the bandwidth bill at the distro's server end, but hey.. not their problem.

    2. FOSS
    Same thing - how many of you have even dropped a penny into a paypal account for a FOSS project ?
    Hey, it reads 'free' right ? Why bother paying them anything ?

    3. Non-free copyrighted MP3s/OGGs -(feeble karma whoring attempt) /DIVX's
    1 & 2 were legal. This one, just like ripped Futurama episodes, isn't (save the ol' "I have it on DVD, but my dog at the DVD, so I just want to download what I had already paid for"-argument).
    But nevertheless, people do download MP3s/etc. of non-free copyrighted works off of services without payment to the copyright holders. Yes, I know, there's ITMS and whatnot, but the amount of users there (who are not the subject of this post) pales to the amount of users on 'alternative' services.

    So, really, what did you expect ? More to the point, what makes you think they feel any need whatsoever to justify it at all ?

    IP 'theft' is rampant, and though I may not agree with those who partake in it, I'm not naive enough to think that some words of ethics/wisdom are about to change these practices.

    I convinced a friend of mine not to download the leaked MS source code. First I appealed to his ethics - no luck. Then I explained how it could taint his coding practices - that worked. Gee, who'd've thunked.

    Eh. End rant. Could go on and on about this :)

  31. What the Internet is all about by October_30th · · Score: 2, Funny
    you can get all the ed2k links on here

    "You can't shut us down! The Internet is about the free exchange and sale of other people's ideas!" - Nappster nerd in I dated a Robot-episode.

    --
    The owls are not what they seem
  32. Re:bit torrent? by GarfBond · · Score: 5, Insightful
    There's more to this than one realizes. DVDs are almost the sole indicator to the distributor of how much demand there is for a TV show. Ever wonder how/why Family Guy is being brought back? It's because the DVD sales of that show were phenomenal. All those sales said to Fox "maybe this show actually *is* popular."

    If you like Futurama enough to want to see it come back, then buying the DVD is basically the only way to prove to Fox that it's worth it. It tells them a) you love the show and b) you love the show enough to spend good money on it. That last one is probably the more important bit.

    Personally, I think the slightly geekier audience of Futurama vs Family guy didn't help its dvd sales; geeks are probably more willing to search out for Bittorrents/kazaa/emule/gnutella of a show, while the mass market is content with dvds.

  33. 1729 by marksilverman · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The article refers to 1729 being "a historically significant integer to mathematicians everywhere". If you're not a mathematician, 1729 is Ramanujan's number -- the smallest natural number that can be written as a sum of cubes in two different ways:

    1^3 + 12^3 9^3 + 10^3

  34. If you want an obscure reference - Samurai Jack by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    In a Samurai Jack episode, a town folk is telling Jack there's two roads ahead of him.

    Jack: "Which road leads to the Dragon's Lair?"
    Town folk: "The left one."
    Jack: "Where does the other road lead?"
    Town folk: "Space Ace."

    If THAT ain't obscure I don't know what is.

    I was still laughing 15 minutes after that, though. :-)

    P.S.: If you didn't get that one, the keyword here is "laserdisc games".

  35. Re:Set of degrees that would rival most think tank by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 3, Informative

    RTFA, please.

    David X. Cohen, Batchelors in Math, Harvard; Masters ComSci, Berzerkeley
    Ken Keeler, PhD in Applied Math and Masters in EE
    Bill Odenkirk, PhD in Inorganic Chem
    Jeff Westbrook PhD in ComSci
    J. Stewart Burns, Batchelors in Math, Harvard; Masters in Math Berkeley

    Perhaps a bit more hard-sciency than the PolSci asshats that populate the average Think Tank.

  36. Good news by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    "Good news everyone, we're getting 500 visitors per second!"

  37. Re:Set of degrees that would rival most think tank by Dr.+Smeegee · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...aaaand I'm a choad and totally missed your joke. Glad I could post that in the blinding fog of my unearned self-regard.

  38. Aleph-null plex by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    My favorite reference was when the gang went to the movies, and it was an "Aleph-null plex". That is, the number of movie theaters was countably infinite. How horribly dorky!

    --
    Gary

  39. You forgot one part of the equation... by Gadgetfreak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    + Run "Sunday Afternoon Football" Half an hour late and not air the episode that was skipped.

    That one's a Fox trademark... complain nobody watches your show, even when you don't air it.

    --
    "No fair, you changed the outcome by measuring it!" - Professor Hubert J. Farnsworth
  40. Let the quotes begin! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    My favorite futurama quote of all time:

    Fry: Oh my god!
    Bender: Oh your god.

  41. No no no... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    They didn't all have beards, although that would have been great, they were all dressed in cowboy garb.

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  42. Re:did the network give a reason by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sorry, but it had to be done:

    Me lose brain cells? Ha ha ha ha.... why I laugh?

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
  43. links dead by Angry+Black+Man · · Score: 2, Insightful
    --
    the byproduct of years of oppression by the white man
  44. geeks by DarkHelmet · · Score: 4, Funny

    I knew the very first episode that these people were geeks when Bender was drinking liquid FORTRAN.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  45. Re:bit torrent? by realdpk · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Futurama isn't coming back, but it could tell Fox that their audience enjoys funny "mature" cartoons (mature as in not kid stuff, but not XXX either).

    Of course, nobody should buy any DVD expecting it to count as a "vote" for their favorite show. Buy it if you want it. Don't expect something to come of it. :)

  46. see, your math degree... by dekeji · · Score: 2, Funny

    is worth something after all.

  47. Re:A vision of the future.... by _xeno_ · · Score: 2, Funny
    I loved the commentary for that part of the pilot though. Paraphrased:

    - Hey, why didn't the building Fry was in get destroyed?
    - Um...
    - Uh...
    - Because... Shut up!
    [ all laugh ]

    I can't remember exactly who said what, but it was really amusing listen to them nitpick thier own show.

    --
    You are in a maze of twisty little relative jumps, all alike.
  48. Funniest moderation ever : ) by Scrameustache · · Score: 5, Funny

    10 HOME
    20 SWEET
    30 GOTO 10

    (Score:0, Redundant)


    Redundant indeed ;-)

    --

    You can't take the sky from me...

  49. I am my own grandpa by jmuzic1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://users.cis.net/sammy/grandpa.htm I remember when my teacher in high school played this while we were studying genetics.

  50. The 'Dennis Miller Ratio' by maddog2o_2o · · Score: 2, Informative

    On the Simpsons when Lisa sees Comic Book Guy's TShirt

    C:\Dos
    C:\Dos\Run
    Run Dos\Run

    LISA:Ha, only one person in a million would find that funny!
    COMIC BOOK GUY: Yes, we call that the "Dennis Miller Ratio."

    MST3K is much the same of course - references whizzing past your ears through the whole show, some you get and some you don't. And some ... well some just stun you with how perfect, and yet how obcure they are. It's like a little gift from the writers to you. :)

    Kevin

  51. Problem is that they don't give the shows a chance by Otto · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There's been a number of good shows that never really had a chance at gaining an audience.

    Take FOX's main revenue stream: The Simpsons. It didn't have a whole lot of eyeballs it's first couple of seasons. But FOX was new, and didn't have anything better to try out. It also put the Simpsons on in arguably the best time slots there could possibly be for a new show, with no heavy hitters up against it on other channels. Simpsons eventually drew the crowd. All the news propaganda and churches denouncing the show (highly controversial stuff at the time) didn't hurt either, I admit.

    Now take Futurama. They put it in possibly the worst position they could: After NFL games, pre-empted a number of times with no repeats. Heck, even my Tivo couldn't figure out when it was airing half the time. 6 or 7 of the episodes I saw for the first time was when it aired on Cartoon Network, and I loved the show! Family Guy was pretty much the same way, with the same results. They didn't give it much of a chance.

    Recently, they did the same to the show Wonderfalls. A very good show.. Produced a whole season, put it in a bad time slot, showed 4 episodes, then pulled it. That's not even a geek humor show, they just killed it dead.

    Firefly aired for what, 3 episodes? Maybe 4? And out of order as well? And I believe it was up against ER or something with equally ridiculous high ratings draw too.

    Shows have to build an audience. You don't get an instant hit overnight, or even over one season. The success of so many of these shows on DVD shows a couple of things:
    a) TV execs are morons who have no idea how to build a fanbase.
    b) Brilliant shows do have a large fanbase despite the total BS numbers that Nielsen provides.

    More than anything, the fact that shows like Firefly, which didn't even air a whole season, are selling so many DVD copies should show the inaccuracy of the Nielsen system in the first place.

    --
    - Give a man a fire and he's warm for a day, but set him on fire and he's warm for the rest of his life.
  52. Ha! It's THAT David Cohen! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Back in the very early days of alt.tv.simpsons (circa 1992), one of the regular contributors was a Dave Cohen. Already knowing that he contributed to National Lampoon ('baby elephant walk...'), I've always wondered if Futurama's D.X.C might have been him.

    (Of course, doing a Google now confirms it. I've been out of the loop for too long...)

    Cue the remark about fans becoming too involved with a favourite show... :-P :-)

    --
    Chris Baird,,(a.t.s FAQ maintainer 1992-1993)

  53. Another ultra-obscure cartoon joke by Indomitus · · Score: 3, Funny

    From 'Pinky & The Brain'

    Brain: Are you pondering what I'm pondering?

    Pinky: Oh, I think so Brain, but SNOBOL for Windows?

    SNOBOL is an early-60s era programming language. The only reason I caught that joke was one of my professors mentioned it offhand the day I saw that episode. I am forever impressed by the writers of P&tB because of this quote.

  54. Re:my lead pipe hurts! by pappy97 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "I had this "Simpsons wannabe" attitude and thought the show was OK, but nothing special. It was only years later that I discovered how great the show actually is."

    You discovered that you would like the show, not that it is great. Futurama is for geeks. It is smart in a "Geek" sort of way. The Simpsons is smart, but you don't have to be a Slashdotter to get the stuff.

    Face reality: You were right the first time, sort of. I wouldn't call it a Simpsons wannabe, but rather "Simpsons in the Future" or

    "Slashdot Simpsons."

    There is nothing special unless you are a geek. That's why Futurama won't come back. It *only* appeals to geeks (like "Firefly," but better).

  55. First Episode by Jbrecken · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recently, CN reran the first episode, and I noticed that you could actually see Nibbler's shadow before Fry falls into the cryochamber.
    If anyone has the first episode as originally aired, was the shadow always there, or did they edit that into the scene for syndication after they did the episode with the brains?

    If it was always there, I'm seriously impressed with the planning that went into the story arc.

    1. Re:First Episode by max+cohen · · Score: 4, Informative

      It was always there.

      Wonderful, isn't it?

    2. Re:First Episode by chuonthis · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have the Region 1 DVDs and the shadow is there. In fact, it is referenced in the audio commentary with shouts of "SECRET!"

  56. I'm Not alone, I hope!! by doublebackslash · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just wanna know if I was the only one that did the caculation of Fry's intrest on his 93 cents? (on a Ti-83 none the less, they used a palm, wusses)
    Also, who else here was the only one in the room cracking up hen the professor complained about the quantum finish?

    Those little things that go into futurama are what make it worth my time to watch, and that is sying a lot.

    --
    Honor system DDos. Please "ping -f 24.247.68.40&"

    --
    md5sum /boot/vmlinuz
    d41d8cd98f00b204e9800998ecf8427e /boot/vmlinuz
  57. Sum of two cubes by Loozrboy · · Score: 2, Funny

    By odd coincidence, it was just a couple days ago that I was watching "Lesser of Two Evils" and got inspired to write a little program to determine whether Bender and Flexo's serial numbers really were expressible as the sum of 2 cubes (although I didn't doubt for a moment they were... just to ruin everybody else's fun, the answers are 119^3 + 119^3 = 3370318 and 952^3 + (-951)^3 = 2716057). Astonishingly, this anecdote failed to impress a job interviewer who asked me what kinds of things I did to keep my programming skills sharp. As if I want to work somewhere that doesn't appreciate a nerdy Futurama fan!

  58. Sum Of Two Cubes by tadmas · · Score: 3, Interesting

    From the activity sheet:

    Bender: Hey robot, what's your serial number?
    Flexo: 3370318.
    Bender: No way! Mine's 2716057.
    [They both laugh. Then Fry laughs, but stops and looks confused.]
    Fry: I don't get it.
    Bender: We're both expressable as the sum of two cubes.
    Flexo: Woooh!

    In the DVD commentary, David Cohen goes on to say that it's tricky to find the cubes. Well, he's right. Here's the trick, in case you were interested:

    3370318 = 119^3 + 119^3
    2716057 = 952^3 + (-951)^3

    No one ever said the cubed numbers had to be positive.... and yes, I'm a dork for working this out!

  59. Its never coming back by gad_zuki! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Keep hoping. The animation quality on that show does not come cheap. Do you remember the ill-fated return of The Critic in Flash? It was terrible. If you cant afford good animators you can't afford good writers. You need x amount of capital to get the ball rolling and I believe Fururama was VERY expensive, moreso than the Simpsons.

    Time is also against the Futurama fans, whatever "synergy" the creative team had has changed. Its simply not feasible to expect them to suddenly do high-quality work again from such a long hiatus, and thats assuming you can even get all the people.

    Production is a very odd thing, when there's a good team they do good work. There are probably two to three episodes of Futurama which I think are low quality and the rest are really just gems. The problem is the network idiots didn't know they were holding a diamond and wouldnt give them a consistant timeslot.

    Ideally, the Simpsons should have been cancelled after the first season of Futurama and Futurama would have taken its place. There's only so much you can do with the Simpsons and its simply been done, over and over. Futurama would have given Fox a new platform to create comedy and sell lots of commercials

    They dropped the ball, and here we are. Expect the Simpsons to become a horrible shell of what it used to be (many will say its already happened) and a sad "had it coming" cancelation instead of a proud exit.