Slashdot Mirror


Interview with Mandrake's Head Honchos

Shipud writes "Newsforge has an interview with MandrakeSoft CEO François Bancilhon, and Mandrakelinux co-founders Jacques Le Marois and Gaël Duval. Among the issues discussed are a the business model for a GPL-based public company, Mandrakesoft's shares, the role of user subscription in funding, the bankruptcy, Xfree 4.4's new non-GPL license, and more."

130 comments

  1. courtesy of LinuxWorld... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...you can hear Francois too if you like :)

    It's a good interview

    1. Re:courtesy of LinuxWorld... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      wasn't there also a /. thread about good tech interview available as sound files?

  2. Old interview. by tkittel · · Score: 2, Informative

    It is an interesting interview, but it was published more than a month ago on may 12th.

    (and I think it was also covered on /. back then).

    1. Re:Old interview. by calethix · · Score: 1

      That's a relief, I thought I was going to have to wait until next year to get Mandrake 10.

      from the interview...
      "Mandrake10 Official boxed sets will be shipped out on about May 10"

    2. Re:Old interview. by matthewn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yeah -- this interview is already out of date in at least two respects. For one, cooker now includes the x.org server. For another, their distribution deal with O'Reilly is now a matter of public record.

    3. Re:Old interview. by Shipud · · Score: 1

      I am the poster, and you are right, it's over a month old. However, I only got wind of this now, and it seemed still relevant & interesting. As far as I know, this was not covered previously on /.

      --
      /sdrawkcab si gis siht
    4. Re:Old interview. by tkittel · · Score: 1

      It appears you are right, a search on /. old stories on "mandrake" didn't turn up anything.

      I probably read it at linux weekly news then or somewhere else...

  3. sc0wned! by astrokid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I thought it was funny:

    A GPL-based business isn't the easiest model to be successful at; what makes it successful?

    FB: A GPL-based business has lots of advantages, such as benefiting from a huge contributor team who help develop and improve our products, and also communicate.

    JLM: If you look to the history of Linux distributions, you will see that the fastest growing are the ones which follow the Open Source rules. Most of the proprietary ones have completely failed. Caldera/SCO is a good example.

    --

    Chewie does not get a medal. Come on, George. Can a Wookie get a medal?
    1. Re:sc0wned! by TWX · · Score: 3, Insightful

      OpenLinux being an example of a badly assembled distribution had nothing to do with it...

      At least Slackware, even with its problems has a long history and has an avid base of followers. Debian has ease post-install administration and maintains a good place with their different versions. Gentoo has a lot of fans of the "bleeding edge". RedHat and SuSE both have good corporate and community support for those who want something pretty right out of the box.

      I didn't see Caldera OpenLinux having any of these, and there were forces resistant to fully accept the GPL as well. The only surprise is that they lasted long enough to turn into SCOX.

      --
      Do not look into laser with remaining eye.
    2. Re:sc0wned! by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      Just wanted to point out - some Gentoo followers also use it for it's ease of "post-install administration."

  4. Pitfall of VC by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Interesting

    GD: Besides not having cut costs enough and early enough, I think that the core of the problem was certainly to consider venture cash as revenues, and thus growing the MandrakeSoft structure artificially.

    Yes. Worth remembering, that one.

    1. Re:Pitfall of VC by twstdr00t · · Score: 1

      venture cash... revenue? last i check revenue was something earned.

      --

      ---------
      AlmostFreeLinux.com
    2. Re:Pitfall of VC by Fred_A · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately a lot of CEOs seem to have skipped that class.

      --

      May contain traces of nut.
      Made from the freshest electrons.
  5. MandrakeSoft by xenostar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It seems that an OSS-based company has to struggle for survival at all times. They are doing a great job, though, and eventhough I personally don't use Mandrake, I respect all the work they've done with it. Hope they come up with a solid business model and start making real money.

    1. Re:MandrakeSoft by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hope they come up with a solid business model and start making real money.

      I'm going to have to make a copy of this comment so I don't have to write it yet again the next time this comes up. Mandrake's Linux business has always done well, although I don't know what you mean by "real money". They got into trouble during the dotbomb era when they were saddled with a "world class management" who did what CxOs are supposed to do and looted the company while plunging it into debt. To Mandrake's credit, they've returned to their core Linux business and worked their way back to solvency after tossing the overpaid management overboard. There are a lot of American companies that need to do exactly the same thing.

    2. Re:MandrakeSoft by dot-magnon · · Score: 1

      I use it, though. Mandrake is a great distribution, newbies and power users alike. It has a good set of tools, and often ducks up polished as a "future looking" type of Linux distribution.

      Now, they're a bit independent in the whole distro mess, I think they might be the biggest still not-so-extremely commercial distribution while still maintaining a working business model.

      I congratulate Mandrake with exiting bankruptcy, and I hope to see a lot of this distribution in the future. It has a good one, I have no doubt ;)

  6. They're french? by Irvu · · Score: 4, Funny

    Well, you know what that means, that means we can't allow this so called "Mandrake" software to be used in the U.S. Nor any other Linux distro that might have "Parisian leanings". We should follow the lead of the Congressional Lunchroom and ban the use of all francophile software in the U.S. of A.

    From now on all linux users will be forced to switch to Microsoft's FreedomOS! which does most, ok some of the things that other stuff does but without all the pacifism.

    Microsoft's FreedomOS, yours for on $799 and up.
    Because the best way to guarantee freedom is to take away your choices.

    1. Re:They're french? by dr-suess-fan · · Score: 1

      Perhaps someone can explain to me the slight or not-so-slight bias against the French in the US I keep hearing about

      Is it just good natured ribbing. What's the source ?

      If 'The patriot' is any accurate indication of US history, I would've expected quite the opposite.

      And yes, I realize this is off-topic.

    2. Re:They're french? by jonbryce · · Score: 1, Informative

      France was opposed to the US invasion of Iraq, and since then, they have been declared "unamerican".

    3. Re:They're french? by strictnein · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      Perhaps someone can explain to me the slight or not-so-slight bias against the French in the US I keep hearing about

      France is in a power play right now and are using the UN/EU/NATO to achieve its goals. It wants to try and regain some of the its past power. The results of this have been to use their power in those orginizations to rebut much of what the US has been trying to do.

      But even before that France and America haven't always gotten along. To them we're crazy gun-toting uncultured right wing Christian criminals (even though our gun related crime has been decreasing and theirs has been increasing greatly due to a huge, uncontrollable black market for guns in Europe, flooding in from Eastern Europre). To Americans the French are snobby, elitist, socialist, and godless people who are morally bankrupt.

      If 'The patriot' is any accurate indication of US history

      No movies coming out of America should be assumed to be anywhere near truthful or accurate. Even our "documentaries" are fictional.

    4. Re:They're french? by _Neurotic · · Score: 0
    5. Re:They're french? by Tarantolato · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Perhaps someone can explain to me the slight or not-so-slight bias against the French in the US I keep hearing about

      1. Your language is different[1].
      2. Your popular press is as prejudiced against us as ours is against you[2].
      3. French foreign policy has a long history of getting in the way of American - I don't just mean the recent stuff either; it goes back at least as far as de Gaulle refusing to endorse the Normandy invasion.
      4. American tourists who come back feeling that the French have been rude to them[3].
      5. Slightly different economic models, and the feeling on each side that the other's is insane.
      6. Historical attraction of American women to foreign men.
      7. Blue-assed baboon syndrome: it's easy to hate the losing side in any important struggle.
      8. Inheritance from British anti-Americanism.
      9. Instinctive dislike of anything that reeks of "high culture".

      [1] Easier to dislike people you don't understand.
      [2] e.g. frequent use of "cowboy" as an insult. or adulation of Michael Moore coupled with the lack of similarly hyper-harsh criticism of Chirac.
      [3] Usually they only go to Paris. Which is a bit like going to New York and then forming judgements about Iowa, New Hampshire and Mississippi based on that.

    6. Re:They're french? by yamla · · Score: 5, Funny
      France was opposed to the US invasion of Iraq, and since then, they have been declared "unamerican".


      Strangely enough, the only people in the world who think this is an insult are Americans.
      --

      Oceania has always been at war with Eastasia.
    7. Re:They're french? by KnacTheMife · · Score: 0

      I'm sure there's a joke in there about competition between Mandrake and SuSE but I haven't found it yet...

      --
      -- "Someone's gotta go back for a shit-load of dimes."
    8. Re:They're french? by MoronGames · · Score: 1

      Which is okay, because, as far as I know, they're not American anways.

      --
      hey!
    9. Re:They're french? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      France was opposed to the US invasion of Iraq, and since then, they have been declared "unamerican".

      Which is okay, because, as far as I know, they're not American anway


      Yes, but that comes as a huge shock to some Americans.

      I'm joking, of course, but only in part. Americans are particularly good at assuming that people in other countries think just like they do. This probably has something to do with the relative lack of other countries nearby compared to much of the world. In the U.S. one can live hundreds of miles (600? 800?) from the nearest foreign nation. Very little of their media gets into the U.S. either (the BBC and Telemundo are about it). And of course, foreign language (and thus foreign cultural) education are not emphasized in schools here in the U.S. In other words, there's a lack of experience with that sort of thing.

    10. Re:They're french? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      > Historical attraction of American women to foreign men.

      America, the only place in the world where my gut doesn't stand in the way of getting pussy (for free). Thank you BritSpeak!

      ps: I love Linux.

    11. Re:They're french? by puppetluva · · Score: 1

      Telemundo unamerican? Telemundo is broadcast out of New Jersey. Get with the program, frenchy!

      /

    12. Re:They're french? by madpuppy · · Score: 1

      Slim Pickins, Blazing saddles......

      oh, boys? look at what I got heah!
      "were da' white women at?!"

    13. Re:They're french? by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Actually, while much of what you said has merit (esp the part about judging a coutry based on ONE famous city), number six is pretty much a general truth. Both men and Women tend to be attracted to the exotic. And a non-anoying accent alone is often enough.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    14. Re:They're french? by ruiner5000 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, well Europe has countries, we have states, and guess what people in Texas don't think like those in California, nor those in Florida or New York. It is France's close involvement with Iraq in under the table deals, poor economy, and weak leadership that has them upset, and in trouble. Yeah, in case you haven't heard the US economy is on the rise. I've been hiring. For those of you have have never taken an economics course, and don't understand flame away.

      --
      ignorance is bliss. googlefiberatx.com
    15. Re:They're french? by ecochard · · Score: 1

      > . French foreign policy has a long history of getting in the way of American Oh my god! You mean they don't think the way american people do? That's very undemocratic; Bush should make them shut up.

  7. I ordred the box set.... by gfxguy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Over two weeks ago and still haven't received it. So ask me to support them, but now two weekends (the time I have to play with linux) are gone for good while I could have ordred cheapbytes CDs and had them last week.

    --
    Stupid sexy Flanders.
    1. Re:I ordred the box set.... by filesiteguy · · Score: 1

      seems like a personal problem...

      This happens all the time and not just with Software companies.

      I took the easy route - I downloaded the community edition. Nice to see the article. I think I'll wait an hour or two to ignore the /. effect.

    2. Re:I ordred the box set.... by grqb · · Score: 2, Informative

      I ordered the powerpack cds and it took about 2.5 weeks to deliver to Canada. I'm not sure why it takes so long to hand over a small box of 6 cds to UPS. It only took UPS 3 days to deliver.

      Maybe this is a sign that Linux really is on the rise? Orders that are overloading Mandrake? ...I doubt it...It also takes forever for Mandrake to reply to emails too.

    3. Re:I ordred the box set.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      George Bush never claimed there was a link between 9/11 and Iraq.

      "The reason I keep insisting that there was a relationship between Iraq and Saddam and Al Qaeda is because there was a relationship between Iraq and Al Qaeda" -- President Bush, as reported by the NY Times today, here.

    4. Re:I ordred the box set.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course, you're going to say that Al Qaeda doesn't necessarily mean 9/11, but it's obvious that that is the conclusion drawn by the public. If Bush and co. hadn't kept trying to try Al Qaeda and Iraq together, the majority of the public wouldn't have been misled like that...

    5. Re:I ordred the box set.... by gfxguy · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Actually, Bush has said on a number of occasions, quite clearly, before we invaded Iraq, that there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11.

      Not only wasn't it a justification, he specifically stated there was no evidence of a connection. I'm just annoyed at the media today, I simply can't believe the bias. When there's so much to complain about, they still have to make things up just to bash Bush.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    6. Re:I ordred the box set.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently he has changed his mind according to CNN

    7. Re:I ordred the box set.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did they charge you, like others, 100 times the actual box amount, then feign ignorance over the place they claim does their transaction procesing? What a crock of shit.

    8. Re:I ordred the box set.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Damn ass loser anonymous coward, it serves me right for responding to AC's against my personal policy. The article you linked to clearly says EXACTLY what I said. BUSH NEVER CLAIMED A LINK BETWEEN IRAQ AND 9/11.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    9. Re:I ordred the box set.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      No, I just think it's incompetence, because the box was sitting on my porch when I arrived home, and I opened it to discover one of the discs missing.

      For anyone considering Mandrake, download it or get it from cheapbytes. If you want to support them, then go ahead and order it, but if you actually want it in a timely manner, you'll have to do it yourself.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    10. Re:I ordred the box set.... by violajack · · Score: 1

      Wow, when I ordered my 9.2 DVD (no box, just the DVD from the Mandrake website) it came 2 day air. The FedEx guy came to place 3 times in one day to make sure it got there on the second day. Either it's harder to ship the box, or things with shipping have gone downhill since 9.2 came out. I also never expected something so cool from FedEx, but I have to give the guy credit, he came by 3 times in the same day. Maybe I just got lucky. I'm sorry waiting for the box is tainting your experience. Mandrake 9.2 was the first linux I actually bought, and I'm glad it was such a good experience. It makes me highly likely to continue supporting Mandrake in the future.

    11. Re:I ordred the box set.... by sp0rk173 · · Score: 1

      What? Media is biased? Cable TV has commercials? The President is funded by terrorist corporations? I have a dog? Your mom? What?!?!

    12. Re:I ordred the box set.... by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I took the easy route - I downloaded the community edition.

      Why would you do that? The official edition is available on the FTP servers and by bittorrent. You do not want to deal with the bugs in 10.0 Community, if the first ISO will even boot. Go download 10.0 Official. The rest of us took the hits for you - take advantage of it.

    13. Re:I ordred the box set.... by clontzman · · Score: 2, Interesting

      What about this?

      [A]cting pursuant to the Constitution and [the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002] is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.

      --President Bush, in a letter to Congress outlining the legal justification for commencing war against Iraq, March 18, 2003

    14. Re:I ordred the box set.... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      [A]cting pursuant to the Constitution and [the Authorization for Use of Military Force Against Iraq Resolution of 2002] is consistent with the United States and other countries continuing to take the necessary actions against international terrorists and terrorist organizations, including those nations, organizations, or persons who planned, authorized, committed, or aided the terrorist attacks that occurred on September 11, 2001.


      include ( P ) Pronunciation Key (n-kld)
      tr.v. included, including, includes

      1) To take in as a part, element, or member.
      2) To contain as a secondary or subordinate element.
      3) To consider with or place into a group, class, or total: thanked the host for including us.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    15. Re:I ordred the box set.... by clontzman · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure if you put that in to bolster my argument or to try to counter it. If it's the former, thanks. If it's the latter, I'm confused.

    16. Re:I ordred the box set.... by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      To counter. 9/11 is included in his declaration of a war on terrorism. IOW, Terrorism as a whole != 9/11.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    17. Re:I ordred the box set.... by makomk · · Score: 1
      Actually, Bush has said on a number of occasions, quite clearly, before we invaded Iraq, that there was no connection between Iraq and 9/11.

      Perhaps not, but he sure implied it - and the media cartainly caught on. Also, he definitely said that there were links between al-Qaeda and Iraq, which was untrue (can anyone find a good link?). In fact, he still does. Well, I suppose they did communicate - IIRC the inquiry found that Saddam Hussein basically said 'fuck off' (or diplomatic equivalent thereof) whenever al-Qaeda asked for anything.

      In conclusion, if you're a politician, don't tell lies, just imply them. Maximum Deniability!

    18. Re:I ordred the box set.... by Tonytheloony · · Score: 1

      So Bush would let Dick Cheney say there is a link and all this time say the contrary?
      Stop playing on words, Bush is guilty of pretending there is a link, and you're an indoctrinated idiot.

      --
      The quickest way to become an atheist is to study the Bible thoroughly.
    19. Re:I ordred the box set.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Implications?

      No, I'm afraid unlike "nuanced" John Kerry, they have said exactly what they mean. They have flat out stated a connection between Al Qaeda and Iraq, and flat out stated that, even so, there is no evidence of any link between Iraq and 9/11. It's not reading between the lines, it's not "nuanced", it's very clear. Anyone who has paid any attention to how terrorist organizations work understand the many cells do not know what the other cells are doing. It's an unfortunately smart move on their part.

      Do you really think they are that bad? I can't imagine what 4 (or God forbid 8) years of "nuance" would do to my blood pressure.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
    20. Re:I ordred the box set.... by gfxguy · · Score: 1

      Hey, I understand that even the Democratic co-chair of the 9/11 Commission, Lee Hamilton, said that there was no justification for the tact the press was taking yesterday.

      I'll say it again, you can get mad at Bush and the Bush administration for a lot of things without having to make stuff up.

      --
      Stupid sexy Flanders.
  8. Bigger than that by wombatmobile · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I think the value of the tale goes significantly beyond Linux. It's a business story with some template lessons for how to manage venture funding (and how not to).

    Easy lessons. Hard to learn.

  9. Success may be coming for them by tarp · · Score: 2, Informative

    Kudos to Mandrakesoft for getting out of their bankruptcy situation. They certainly have the possibility of becoming a leader in Linux distributions, since Red Hat has dropped the ball to focus on enterprise linux. Does anyone remember the days when Mandrake was little more than a relabelled RedHat with some slight modifications? I would never have guessed they'd still be around.

  10. Ya listening, Apple? by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Interesting

    GD: Adopt a business model that is in harmony with Open Source Software; do not try to do proprietary with Open Source Software. And if you don't believe in OSS, don't do OSS!

    There, you've been told by a frenchman!

    I thought the principle of Open Source was anyone can use it however the hell they please.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

      No, "stratjakt", that would be Public Domain. The principle of Open Source is more Wicca than Crowley.

    2. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The principle of Open Source is more Wicca than Crowley

      That's it, I'm boycotting open source forever!

      Bahlasti! Ompehda! I fucking hate Wiccans.

    3. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which Open Source? Anyway, it's all in the license. BSD, you can take, modify and keep. GPL, you can take, modify, and keep only if you don't release it to anyone. You must give back your contributions if you release them. So, Apple is sticking to the license terms of the BSD software they use, and more. Their contributions back are strictly from their good will.

    4. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by KJE · · Score: 1
      Um, you conviniently left out the question that he was answering:

      What advice would you offer to someone who is contemplating starting a GPL-based business?

      Is Apple's a GPL-based business? Nope. Hell, the biggest OSS part of Apple's business would be their use of BSD in Darwin, which, isn't exactly under the GPL now is it? And gimme a break with the frenchman line, jeez.

    5. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by Turmio · · Score: 1

      I thought the principle of Open Source was anyone can use it however the hell they please.
      I guess you could (over)simplify that this is the spirit of Open Source. However, this certainly is not the spirit of Free Software where free software must remain free.

    6. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The principle of Open Source is more Wicca than Crowley.

      Oh wait, I get it. You mean:

      Wicca:An ye harm none, do as ye will.
      Crowley:Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law.

      That's a shitty analogy.

    7. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, it is. You can use GPL software any way you want. You can just not redistribute it without meeting some requirements....

    8. Re:Ya listening, Apple? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I thought the principle of Open Source was anyone can use it however the hell they please.

      Then you haven't read the GPL. That is why Mandrake has several versions. Some contain non-OSS material, while the download version is strictly OSS. They follow the rules. What's your point - or gripe?

  11. I can't help but wonder by bool+morpheus() · · Score: 2, Interesting

    With as much success as a company like Mandrake is having, can't companies like Microsoft see that the days of charging $400 for you OS are gone?

    --

    ----
    Ground Control to Major Tom...
    1. Re:I can't help but wonder by bool+morpheus() · · Score: 1

      Of course, by success I mean pulling themselves out of bankruptcy and whatnot.

      --

      ----
      Ground Control to Major Tom...
    2. Re:I can't help but wonder by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      And by pulling themselves out of bankruptcy you mean by begging for donations from their "fanbase", or zealots, or followers, disciples, etc..

      Yeah, I'm sure the whine and beg business model will be all the rage on Wall St this time next year, those Europeans are always ahead on the fashions!

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:I can't help but wonder by bool+morpheus() · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'd say that for the amount of financial trouble they were in, the "whine and beg" was kept pretty quiet. It wasn't like something came up every 30 minutes saying, "Give us money!".

      --

      ----
      Ground Control to Major Tom...
    4. Re:I can't help but wonder by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. The largest, most profitable, arguably most successful company in history should definitely follow the shining example set by a bankrupt startup.

    5. Re:I can't help but wonder by KnacTheMife · · Score: 0

      1) it seems to have worked somewhat... 2) At least the power visibly rests with the consumers, unlike other business models where consumers are treated like junkies

      --
      -- "Someone's gotta go back for a shit-load of dimes."
    6. Re:I can't help but wonder by calethix · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Normally I find the majority of your posts to be pretty entertaining but I don't think I would put Mandrake in the 'begging' category.
      So they have a bunch of stuff on the download page asking you to donate, big deal. It's not like every so often, you run a program and it reminds you to donate in the same fashion as some shareware.

      Personally, I would much sooner make a donation to Mandrake based on how they treat their customers than buy Microsoft software. I'm lucky enough to get the professional versions of Windows and Office through my school if I wish. On the rare ocassion that I was working on a relative's PC with the home edition of something, I found product activation to be quite annoying.

      Besides, getting out of bankruptcty wasn't just about getting more donations. They had to take a look at their business and cut out what was wasteful to survive. That by itself should be a lesson to other companies which think the only way out of a problem is to gouge their customers a little more instead of looking for internal problems.

    7. Re:I can't help but wonder by Mad_Rain · · Score: 1

      ...I like the underlying sarcasm there, but how many times did Microsoft have a brush with bankruptcy in their beginnings? They did have to compete with IBM at one point...

      --
      "What do you think?" "I think 'What, do you think?!'"
    8. Re:I can't help but wonder by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      And by pulling themselves out of bankruptcy you mean by begging for donations from their "fanbase", or zealots, or followers, disciples, etc..

      What pushed your hot button on this topic? You can make yourself feel superior by calling Linux users zealots and disciples if you want, but it won't change the tide. The fact is that Mandrake offered privileges to those users willing to pay for them. We get first access to downloads and discounts on the commercial (yes, commercial) packages as well as other perks you could see by visiting the Mandrakeclub site (but you won't).

      Even if Mandrake didn't offer the perks, I'd still support them with donations because I like the easily-installed distro, and, annualized, it's far less than I'd have to pay M$ for their inferior product. It is in my best interests to keep Mandrake in business because they have a product I want. Seems like a pretty normal business model to me. No doubt you think all those MS "disciples" who paid through the nose for Licensing 6.0 and received no upgrades got a good deal.

    9. Re:I can't help but wonder by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I couldn't agree more. The largest, most profitable, arguably most successful company in history should definitely follow the shining example set by a bankrupt startup.

      That would be better than having Mandrake follow the example of the morally bankrupt "arguably most successful company in history". Some things are more important than money, but I don't expect you to believe that.

    10. Re:I can't help but wonder by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Ah, that's very idealistic. Unfortunately, whether or not a company has morals is a moot point if they're finacially bankrupt. Change is only possible with money and power. Good people who actually have real impact on society: Larry Flynt, Howard Stern, Michael Moore. Notice that all of them have either a lot of money, a lot of influence, or both. A 60 person company on the verge of bankruptcy can't have very much impact on much of anything.

    11. Re:I can't help but wonder by hostyle · · Score: 0

      I take it you missed Marketting 101 and skipped the Advertising Where It Matters tutorials?

      --
      Caesar si viveret, ad remum dareris.
    12. Re:I can't help but wonder by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      Unfortunately, whether or not a company has morals is a moot point if they're finacially bankrupt.

      I suppose you enjoy listening to yourself talk. Mandrake is no longer in bankruptcy. Do I need to list a bunch of major companies that have gone through bankruptcy for you? The public perception of a company's morals can have a significant "impact" on its future. Take Worldcom for example.

      Good people who actually have real impact on society: Larry Flynt, Howard Stern, Michael Moore. . . . A 60 person company on the verge of bankruptcy can't have very much impact on much of anything.

      Let's see. There was a two-person company in a garage run by fellows named Hewlett and Packard. There was a two-person business run by two kids named Jobs and Wozniak. There was a guy who didn't even have a company, named Ghandi. Your definition of "impact" seems somewhat limited and your heros somewhat shallow.

  12. Debian all the way by damballah · · Score: 1

    If you hang out on the Cooker mailing list, you'll see that these guys favor the Debian way of doing things. You can see that with their new release model

  13. Bankrupcy stories by dotz · · Score: 1

    Mandrake's luckily not dead, but it's always worth to read a story, how other people didn't manage or had trouble leading business - so we can learn from their faults. You can IMO learn more from them, than from reading success stories. For example, check this one!

  14. OSDN Notice? by ProudClod · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This is the first time I've seen a link to Newsforge without the "Slashdot and Newsforge both part of OSDN" disclaimer.

    Is this an unintentional omission?

    --
    Gamers Europe - Gaming News. Reviews.
  15. They're French?! by code_monkey_steve · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does that mean we need to rename Mandrake to "Freedom Linux"?

    1. Re:They're French?! by vsprintf · · Score: 2, Informative

      Does that mean we need to rename Mandrake to "Freedom Linux"?

      Sounds like a good name to me, especially since they lost the court fight to use the name "Mandrake". Seriously. Apparently the syndicate that has the rights to "Mandrake the Magician" took exception, and the French courts agreed. And yes, I use Mandrake . . . or whatever it's going to be called.

  16. Xfree Discussed? by xthor · · Score: 1

    Among the issues discussed are... Xfree 4.4's new non-GPL license...

    I guess this is a discussion?
    FB: Yes. We disagree with the new license with regards to the GPL.

  17. This story's a month old! by Dano · · Score: 1

    This story is a MONTH old! Stop posting crusty news!

  18. FB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I used to work for a company ran by FB...didnot do so well. Spent way more money then they had a chanc e of earning. Hes a good guy...but hes started up 4 internet companies, only 1 of which was sucessful AFAIK. He was fond of outsourcing to India before it was popular too

  19. More of a "mention." by OmniGeek · · Score: 1

    I guess the news that Mandrake is planning to join the massive shift to X.org with the next Cooker version is more recent than this interview. Guess there's not much of an issue there any more.

    --

    "My strength is as the strength of ten men, for I am wired to the eyeballs on espresso."
  20. more than just opposed by asv108 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The main French government action that caused the Bush administration and others on the far right to promote anti-french behavior was the French government's opposition to a second UN resolution, authorizing the use of force in Iraq. There were plenty of other countries that were against the resolution, but France was the only member of the UN security counsel that said it would veto any attempt at a second resolution outright.

    Personally, I think what France did was a brave a noble act that should be applauded.

    1. Re:more than just opposed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      technically the french did it for the OIL.

      thats right, it was a nonwar for oil

      go read up on the french oil company (govt owned) and all the business they were doing, illegally with iraq.

    2. Re:more than just opposed by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      It wasn't brave and noble. They had oil deals in Iraq in violation the UN sanctions. They didn't want to kill thier Illicit income. Looks a lot like they were bought and paid for by Saddam to me.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
    3. Re:more than just opposed by Mycroft_VIII · · Score: 1

      Just for the record I'm only blaming the government of France, not the otherwise decent people of France who were just as sold down the river as anyone else screwed by this disgracefull act.

      Mycroft

      --
      https://signup.leagueoflegends.com/?ref=4c3ed6600b6ea
  21. Club membership... by linuxlover · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I have been a Mandrake Club member for last 2 years. My membership expires in a few days and I am re-thinking my committment.

    One thing I was dissappointed was the 'rpm voting of members'. When KDE 3.2 was released, there were no MDK packages any where in MDK website (or I couldn't find with thier search). Not even in club area. In the voting area, there were numerous requests for KDe3.2-mdk.rpms for MDK 9.2. But weeks went by without no response from MDK team. Finally I was so sick of waiting and installed through 'konstruct' (what a nice piece of software!).

    So now that MDK is making some money and they are not as 'needy' as they were couple of years back, I'll probably skip renewing my membership.

    Are there any other 'tangible' benefits for club members that I am not aware of?

    1. Re:Club membership... by Stevyn · · Score: 1

      http://richardlinux.net/

      I just discovered this one tonight. He already has the KDE 3.2.2 rpms. The 3.2.3 are comming soon apparently. It would be nice if mandrake was faster and actually released these, but I'm a poor college student and I didn't pay so I can't complain. Mandrake 10 is the easiest distro I've ever used. I'd recommend it to anyone trying linux out for the first time. I'll eventually grow up a little and switch to gentoo because of the portage system, but it's great to get your feet wet with.

    2. Re:Club membership... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what the hell does the portage system give you?

      Seriously. Source optimizations do not led to tangible real and noticeable efficiencies.

      I am tired of Gentoo folks jumping on every thread.

      And then there is the Apple line "What every Linux distribution should be". Says who? I don't want proprietary software on top of propietary hardware. When OS X runs on a few architectures and is free software, call me. Apple's prettyness will not last forever. Give us a two years and report...

    3. Re:Club membership... by Stevyn · · Score: 2, Informative

      Fair question. Before I used it I got annoyed by gentoo zealots puffing it like it was the next savior.

      So I'll make it easy and explain it. Typing "emerge " downloads the (usually) most current version, all of it's dependencies, and installs it. I've gone crazy playing cat and mouse with compiling packages from scratch to satisfy the dependencies.

      I use mandrake and their packages become out of date quickly and it's gets aggrivating. True, gentoo by default compiles everything. You can get binary packages for the big ones so you won't be compiling kde for a few days. The smaller packages don't take that long so it's not a big deal. As for the speed increase, I don't know if it's noticable.

      I hope that explains it clearly. I don't like gentoo just because a bunch of nerds on slashdot worship it. I've used it and many other distros and I've come to that conclusion on my own.

  22. Dont Insult Americans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Dont Insult the Americans , There is a reason the
    Etats-Unians call themself Americans when they are in fact The US of A and not CANADA
    ( C ourageous A merican , N oble A merican , D efender of A merica )

    There ashame of who they truely are so they try to make them self look bigger by saying where from that continent and not from that country.

  23. Tone of interview by Laxitive · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This interview was actually very refreshing, a large part due to the way in which the questions were answered:

    The bankruptcy issue loomed over MandrakeSoft for a long time. What led to the bankruptcy filing?
    FB: At the time, we had to seek protection for a simple reason: There was no more cash in bank, and our revenues were still lower than our expenses. It was a matter of a few months, but it was needed.

    Short answer: "we were broke". No doubletalk, no spin.

    MandrakeSoft made posting asking the community to help them with their financial woes. Some have said that MandrakeSoft essentially begged for money. Any truth to that?
    FB: Yes, the community of Mandrakelinux users helped us, but they get something in return: We're still here, we improved much, and we keep on providing products that fit their needs.

    Translation: yeah, we begged, but we had to, and it paid off in the end. Now we're stronger for it.

    What about the problems with NTFS in the Community Edition?
    FB: This was something that never should have made it into the CE. This should have been caught in our developmental process. We have some definite improving to do.

    I'm not pulling these quotes out to make fun of Mandrake or anything. The thing is, it's easy for companies and representatives to talk straight when they're speaking about their successes. What's hard is to acknowledge failures, and acknowledge them directly. The fact that the responders didn't try to beat around the bush, and actually answered the questions posed is extremely promising. I'm not a Mandrake user, but the fact that these guys seem to talk straight makes me trust them quite a bit more than other companies.

    If I ever have to choose a distribution to recommend to someone who is not too familiar with Linux, I think I have a pretty good idea of who I'll go with now.

    -Laxitive

    1. Re:Tone of interview by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have to admire their principles. They even say Open Source will benefit Microsoft(!)

      I wasn't so impressed with Mandrake 10 CE, unfortunately. But even so, I don't think poorly of Mandrakesoft. They just need to get the technical part of their operation down.

  24. No you Mean Etat-unians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You mean an Etats-unians , American include People from Canada to Argentina who live on the american continent. Dont insult them by bringing them down to the same level as to the majority of stupid people living in the United states.

    Thats why there country is called United-States "OF America".

    But to sum it up, go to any country and you will find some morons who hates another country due to its own stupidity alone , no real reason is needed.

    As far as other influence , your fact base is wrong , but what people watch the most on TV is Reality tv, simpson and other Internationnal show, or something similar.

    1. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      People from the Central African Republic call themselves Central Africans, despite the fact that there are many countries in Central Africa.

      Why don't people ever bitch about that?

    2. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Question is why are you ashame of who you truely are an Etats-Unians your also a country of america and that make you an american , but the United States of America dont mean your the only American.

      "OF America"

      Will never mean more then what it means.

      CANADA

      C oureageous
      A merican
      N oble
      A merican
      D efender of
      A merica

      Where not Ashame to Be Canadian and Americans , but then again where not Etats-Unians. Whe have no reason to HIDE where in America where from.

    3. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by FunkSoulBrother · · Score: 1

      Where not Ashame to Be Canadian and Americans , but then again where not Etats-Unians. Whe have no reason to HIDE where in America where from.

      that made aboslutely no sense. Can anyone decipher that?

    4. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that made aboslutely no sense. Can anyone decipher that?


      "I'm a blabbering idiot."

    5. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Its easy , well if your not clueless and stupid.( wich you seem to be )

      Anyone who live on the American continent is an American.

      You have Canadian , Etat-Unians , Mexican , Brazilian , etc ... All Americans.

      For Some reason ( Shame mostly ) the Etats-Unians never refer to themself as from the United States , but from America and being American as to make , somehow , themself look bigger ( only in there tiny little brain ) and to associate with the continents.

      I hopes it simplifies it enough for you , in your own native langage too , its not deciphering you need its a real factual education. And maybe a brain too.

    6. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by MoneyT · · Score: 1

      Parlez-vous anglais? Parce-que votre anglais et votre Français sont très terrible.

      --
      T Money
      World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
    7. Re:No you Mean Etat-unians by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks , coming from you , I am sure its a praise ;-)

  25. There not going to destroy what they created by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No the United States "OF America" whas called irelevant , stupid and above all else "UNAMERICAN".

    EVERYONE and EVERY Country whas oposed to the war in Irak exept the cureent leader of the United States GWB. Who purposely Lied , cohearsed and fabricated false intel to bring a number of other country ( Britain , Spain , etc ... ) to join them in this "ILLEGAL" ( all war are illegal , but the one sanctionned by the UN are at least legally based and on moral ground) war.

    But the Stupid Etats-Unians ( real name of the people of the United States ) always see the French as someone to pick on because the French And Canada , who whas a colony at the time Helped Create the United States. And for that they are ashame of.

    1. Re:There not going to destroy what they created by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Kid, stop playing hooky and go back to school. Your spelling sucks, your grammar sucks, your French sucks (here's a hint, the French have a specific word to describe someone from the US), your arguments are less than worthwhile, and you can't even figure out what to capitalize and what not to.

      Mais, je suppose qu'il est trop difficile pour vous.

  26. What about the club? by IncohereD · · Score: 1

    For anyone considering Mandrake, download it or get it from cheapbytes. If you want to support them, then go ahead and order it, but if you actually want it in a timely manner, you'll have to do it yourself.

    With the club membership you get access to the club mirrors for a whole year, don't have to wait for shipping, and don't cost them money on packaging, etc.

  27. Bankruptcy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Mandrake knows all about bankruptcy,that's for sure.

  28. Re:This just in by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lol

  29. Re:hahahaha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what did you think the ww2 version was a made up thing?. :)

  30. Re:courtesy of LinuxWorld... tsarkon reports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    its a sucky interview, and no one cares.

    you are a fucking loser for liking womandrake.

    fuck you. go be a loser somewhere else. /. is chock full of them, and i dont know why i try and dilute the loserdom here with my god-ness, but its probably to just say fuck you and leave you pigs in the wake of my godliness.

  31. Head Honchos ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    That's so... 70s
    But I guess you can expect that when talking about an OS based on UNIX, it'll always be nostalgic about the 70s, with its beards, sandals, lame tight tshirts and people that keep talking about boxen, bofh's, insensitive clods, soviet russia, without realizing they're just laughable fossils that nobody takes seriously anymore.