Slashdot Mirror
Moon Rocket Scrubbed and Blown Dry
loid_void writes "Reutersis is reporting that a giant Apollo moon rocket that never got off the ground is about to get a face-lift after years of rusting away in the Texas heat and humidity at the Johnson Space Center.
Workers will construct a shelter for the Saturn V rocket and give it the equivalent of a "blow dry" in the first steps to preserve the relic of NASA's golden age, said Allan Needell, Apollo program curator for the Smithsonian Institution's National Air and Space Museum.
The 363-foot-long behemoth has lain on its side in front of JSC since 1977, a favorite sight of tourists, but also a victim of the elements.
Instead of launching astronauts to the moon as it was built to do, it has become a slowly fading hulk of peeling paint and corroded metal where birds live and plants sprout, Needell said on Wednesday during a visit to the rocket.
"There's a lot of biology growing on there," he said, pointing out streaks of algae staining the rocket's white skin."
How cool would it be to sink a Saturn V rocket as an artificial reef!
I wonder if they'll have any involvement. After all they single-handedly restored the Liberty Bell 7 (their link here. And also helped with the restoration of the Apollo 13 as well. When you tought of Kansas, you probably didn't think of space now did ya?
Your hair look like poop, Bob! - Wanker.
I drive past it several times a week (down Saturn Drive for the locals), and it just makes me sick to see it in the shape it's in. Thank God it's finally going to be taken care of and treated as the treasure it is. The pictures don't do justice to the damage being done to the ship.
By the way, as a teenager, I was horrified to hear that they were going to display it on its side. I thought for sure that it was going to be displayed upright. What a dweeb I was (am?). Yeah, that would be great: make it so you could only see the bottom. And then there's the problems it would cause with low-flying aircraft, (lots of them, including those annoying advertizement-pulling planes). Oh, and we get hurricanes down here in these parts.
A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
It all depends.
;) ) but it may not be at NASA's behest.
The 60s/70s are definately the infancy of humanity in space. They hopefully are *not* the only golden age of humanity in space.
They may, however, be the golden age of NASA, when NASA could do no wrong.
It all depends on the next 20 years, I'd say. Will NASA continue to be the only road to space, or will National Geographic or the Discovery Channel be able to mount their own space missions? I mean, the last space IMAX film made 50 million. That doesn't buy you much now, but if launch costs are down, you might be able to fund a mission just for the IMAX film.
It's really an open question for me if the government, academia, or private industry is best suited to really explore space. Each one has their drawbacks, but so far the government has been in the driver's seat.
So yeah, there's probably room for a even-more-golden age in the future (call it the palladium age
Our current Babylon-5-esque best hope for space is probably the garage hacking of Scaled COmposites and Armadillo Aerospace.
Gentoo Sucks
The best way to honor the memory of "NASA's golden age" would be to top it.
NASA does excellent unmanned science, but the moon shot, cool as it was, wasn't good science or space policy.
Good thing private efforts are starting to pick up the slack.
I must add that the most awe-inspiring thing to me is that all the construction, design and launch was done on slide rules.
They ought to auction it on ebay. I wonder what it would go for...
If God had meant for man to see the sunrise, He would have scheduled it later in the day.
When I was at Marshall Spaceflight Center in Huntsville, Al., they used to test the SSME (Space Shuttle Main Engines) at a test stand a few miles from my building. I was amazed at the power and noise of the SSMEs until an oldtimer told me what it was like when they tested one of the Saturn V engines: He said your coffee cup would literally bounce off of the desk, and forget talking on the phone during a test fire. And that was just the one engine. Imagine what it was like when they all fired at the same time...
A clever person solves a problem, A wise person avoids it. -Einstein
There's a good statement to be made here about the implied social contract that a representative government makes with it's citizens. As the US population continues to grow, the percentage of people with no marketable skills will likewise continue to increase. And if our society is going to support the idea that we can keep producing more people despite the fact that there are less resources available for them, we need to find a way to keep everyone happy and feeling productive, without overburdening the government or creating a negative social status (welfare).
Put simply, the government needs to be able to support people who want to be artists, writers, musicians, hobbyists, explorers, naturalists, scientists, inventors, or any other interest that involves individual dedication and creativity. The product of the work those people do would be public domain, benefitting everyone, without consuming many resources or putting taxpayer's money to poor use. Meanwhile, anyone with a line on a normal form of employment or who wished to retain ownership of their works would follow the normal, self-supported way of life we all try to have today. Anybody could choose which path to take, and the cost of the system is not as high as you think - it doesn't take much money to pay someone a basic income to relax at home and write poetry. And by supporting people's interests we would be encouraging people to follow them, rather than paying based on the number of children a welfare family can crank out, as we do today.
Until recently, Oxford, Cambridge and other universities in the UK were completely free for citizens to attend. Graduates of those institutions could go on to hold a post with the government, researching various things for a moderate income for all their lives. This is the way things should be, not requiring students to pay hundreds of thousand of dollars to feed the over-inflated salaries of university administrators and who then must accept positions that often encourage them to bend their ethics for the purposes of a greedy individual or corporation.
The government _SHOULD_ be "wasting" millions of dollars paying people to do things like develop a space program. It has benefited us all and cost us much less than the 'war on terror', which has left us only with degraded individual freedoms, dead men and women from mostly lower-income families and more millions into the bank accounts of the businessmen who engineered the whole thing. Thank you, Cheney.
-Elentar
The wheel it turns, around and around, with an ancient rumbling sound.
I worked at the Johnson Space Center for two years, back in 1976-1978, and I was there when they brought in the Saturn V.
... really annoyed, saddened, and angry that NASA has let this vehicle rot away.
This was actual flight hardware that was supposed to have gone to the moon for the Apollo 18 mission. When they brought it in, it still had red "Remove before flight" tags hanging from various places.
I am
I could not see the Gantry, so I had to wait 'till it came over the trees. It was a moonless night. The moment it was ignited, and minutes before I saw it, the sky turned an acetylene-yellow and night became as day. Had I been driving on Interstate 95 there is no doubt I could have turned of my lights and drivrn in complete safety at 70+ MPH: it was THAT bright. About 30 seconds later, the groundwave hit and set of every car alarm in the neighborhood, made every garage door rattle and got every dog withing miles howlin' thier arses off. About a minute or so afterwards, the rumble of the motors was heard.
An additional minute passed before it came over the trees and headed North.
What a beast of a machine. I bet the Saturn was at least twice as impressive.
Rock-N-Roll!!!
Yeah...I think this beast is worth saving.
Wikipedia has an extremely informative entry on the Saturn V, which includes a neat table of Saturn V launches and a note about the three Saturn Vs on display. Quoting:
Currently there are three Saturn Vs on display:
* At the Johnson Space Center made up of first stage of SA-514, the second stage from SA-515 and the third stage from SA-513
* At the Kennedy Space Center made up of S-IC-T and the second and third stages from SA-514
* At the US Space & Rocket Center, Huntsville, Alabama made up of S-IC-D, S-II-F/D and S-IVB-D (all test stages not meant for actual flight)
Of these three, only the one at the Johnson Space Center is fully comprised of stages that were meant to be launched.
The third stage of the JSC Saturn V is the one that was removed from SA-513 in 1973 to make room for Skylab.
I've lived in Clear Lake for my whole life, and the Saturn V at JSC is a familiar landmark. I can't imagine my drive to work without it, and it's a good thing that NASA is going to clean it up. It is a truly awesome sight.
Correction: the Alabama Saturn V is at the Space & Rocket Center in Huntsville, not at Marshall.
Also, it's the one laying down at the back of the property. The vertical Saturn V is a replica.
I say lets build another and go back. Not going back is like the Vikings and the Spaniards going to the Americas once and never returning. Humans have always pushed the boundaries further back. But now it just seems we're lazy and greedy. I also think we should do more to explore the oceans. That's just as challenging. Imagine what we could learn.
All the launched Saturn V first and second stages are somewhere on the ocean floor. I doubt if they're at reef depth, though.
The clearance system sounds logical. It is not. It is completely arbitrary. -- John Bolton