Slashdot Mirror


Wireless Music/Media Player Roundup?

robmueller asks: "Like most of you here on Slashdot, I've got my entire music collection on my PC, and would like to share it around the house to at least my lounge room stereo. While the AirPort Express is still a month away (mid July), and the lack of a remote control seems like a problem for a stereo away from the computer, there's a number of other devices out there already; D-Link DSM-320, Squeeze Box, Actiontec, Virtuoso MC-500 (uh... looks like the Actiontec), and a standard 'we hooked it up for 5 minutes' review of several more devices here. However, I want to hear from people who have actually used one, and what they liked, didn't like, ease of use, audio only, is audio & video useful? etc. So who's using one of these things?"

47 comments

  1. Why spend the extra money by sporktoast · · Score: 3, Interesting

    With a streaming setup, you need a much more expensive computer device to receive anything. FM radios are a dime a dozen. You are unlikely to listen to more than one stream at once.

    What you want is something like this . Plug it into the sound-out of a cabled media computer (or, heck, a Wireless Music/Media Player, if you feel the need to comply with the latest buzzwords). Put the computer wherever you have the space (closet, basement, attic) and keep your stereo clutter-free. Tune the FM transmitter to a free space low on the dial (89.3 or so), and listen to your streams on any stereo in/around/outside the house. So long as you aren't stepping on any other nearby frequencies, and the reception drops off significantly enough before you get more than a few houses away, you shouldn't have much worry about complaints.

    Or you can drag your Wireless Music/Media Player out into the backyard the next time you want to host a barbecue. Of course, "wireless" doesn't usually apply to power cables and wall warts.

    --
    In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    1. Re:Why spend the extra money by naden · · Score: 3, Funny

      Because the quality of those FM transmitters isnt the best.

      And I'm sure as you know all Slashdot readers have $100K stereo equipment which is too high end for crappy MP3, AAC or FM transmitters.

      So I'm sorry .. if its not streaming OGG it just ain't cutting the mustard.

      --
      Funtage Factor: Purple
    2. Re:Why spend the extra money by rkhalloran · · Score: 1

      Another option is this, which looks like a set of USB speakers to your PC, and sends the audio stream on FM. Cheap and straightforward. Yes, I know it's a cheap FM transmitter, but it'll handle streaming audio just fine, and save me messing around with YA device at the A/V cabinet.

    3. Re:Why spend the extra money by mrzaph0d · · Score: 1

      free space low on the dial (89.3 or so)

      damnit, i already have trouble hearing 89.3 that station as it is. :)

      --
      this is just a placeholder till i send back my real sig from the future.
    4. Re:Why spend the extra money by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is not some dinky portable iRock-type thing, running on AAA batteries, with just enough juice to get from your mp3 player on the front passenger seat to the car stereo that is only a few feet away. This is the sort of thing that gyms use to let you listen to BET on your headphones without everyone else on their treadmills having to get jiggy with you. This is the kind of things new subdivisions set up in the model home so that you can listen in your car when you drive by.

      These are more powerful, less subject to interference, have a Phase Loop Lock (PLL) circuit that keeps the signal solid. After that, the antenna you choose becomes the biggest issue. Use a yard-sale cast-off PC, throw your favorite light distro on it and stick it in the attic, with the transmitter hanging off of it.

      For controls, use a web interface to your media player software, and you can hit it from any PC on your network. You can run streams, local MP3 or OGG files, internet radio, XM satellite radio, whatever. Put the smarts in the flexible, inexpensive, commodity hardware and hide it away.

    5. Re:Why spend the extra money by hackstraw · · Score: 1

      I will implement a FM trasmitter, its too cheap and utilitarian not to. But, I also want a high quality connection as well.

  2. The fact still remains .. by naden · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Songs bought from iTMS can only be played on your stereo using Airport Express.

    So I'm happy to wait the three weeks until it arrives, as iTMS + Airport Express + Bluetooth Phone + Sailing Clicker + Powerbook is just ubercool.

    Or in other words: "It really whips the llama's ass"

    --
    Funtage Factor: Purple
  3. HP DMR EW-5000 by prostoalex · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bought an HP Digital Media Receiver from Buy.com on their special sale for $100. Wireless connectivity, composite audio, S-Video, what more can one want?

    Well, turns out, a lot. For one, the data was not exactly streamed through the unit, which I properly connected to my stereo system and TV. The local MP3 files and local JPEG pictures was the only thing that HP Receiver played, so if you wanted to broadcast a Shoutcast stream or Real Video stream, you were out of luck.

    None of the DRMed files worked either, so two WMAs that I have purchased from Napster would have to be ripped to CDs, re-ripped into MP3s and then loaded onto a local PC with wireless connection for that HP Media Receiver to pick up.

    I returned the item for a refund after a few days. Waste of money. Until full-blown audio streaming and any kind of video playback is supported together with multiple formats (OGG including), there's little incentive in getting a Media Receiver when a WiFi-enabled laptop plugged into stereo and TV will do the job even better.

  4. Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by tieke · · Score: 5, Informative

    I looked at all those options as well, and decided that with the way the market is going, there will be a more kick-arse version of anything I buy within 6 months. (I'm not just talking standard technology advances better, I'm talking everyone getting into the field better)

    I know that you specified wireless, (which I considered, as I already have an 802.11g AP plugged into my network) but for now I have ended up getting a Hauppage MediaMVP and putting in a run of cat5 to it.

    The MediaMVP is basically just a small remote-control driven, network-connected set-top box which plays content from a server on a win2000/xp machine. Linux drivers have been made though, and the built in mpeg decoder makes it a good combo for the standard Hauppage PVR cards.

    On the positive side, the sound quality is good, and the price is hard to beat ($99 retail, can be found for less).

    Unfortunately the interface is shit. Very basic mp3 browsing - can move through the directories and playlists on your shared computer and select songs/playlists/directories. Unfortunately, there is no real skipping while playing several songs - the default setup if you choose a song is to play that one song and then stop. You can choose to play all songs in a directory, (shuffled if you wish), but it deosn't let you skip songs - if you choose another song, it just plays that one. The "skip" button just moves to the next page on the directory listing - an even worse interface on this first generation device than on my other first generation devices from preceding years.

    The gui should however get better with firmware releases - already the latest firmware lets you add streaming radio stations (although not realaudio) and play divx files (although these have to be transcoded by your server). The MVP internals run on linux as well, so there are good possibility of future improvements.

    As I said - there's quite a few similar devices coming out at the moment (eg this buffalo one ), and in six or seven months there will undoubtedly be something much better - but if I really want one of those I can buy it then, and I consider $99 a good price for 6-7 months of music.

    1. Re:Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by Captain+Splendid · · Score: 1
      Parent is absolutely right, this sector of the market is nowhere near enough mature. We're still, IMO, in the iPod "phase" of things. I reckon we're stilla t least a year away from a decent (ie stabel and feature-rich) sub-$100 device that streams everything one could desire.

      To my mind, the slimp3 devices seem to fit this bill, but the price will have to come down some before they can start cornering the market.

      The FM transmitter idea is a good one, but even if it performs flawlessly, it's still a stop-gap measure.

      Bottom line: Hack something together as cheap as you can for right now, but don't settle down with anything permanent just yet.

      --
      Linux, you magnificent bastard, I read the fucking manual!
    2. Re:Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I just bought the Hauppage MediaMVP yesterday and tested it on my 802.11b network. It works fine that way for music and pictures, but, of course, that isn't quite enough bandwidth for video, so my MPEG-2 video recorded by my TV card stutters.

      I *might* be able to get it to work decently if I upgrade to 802.11g (which I'm planning to do anyway, soon), but instead I'm going to run cat5 from my computer room to living room which I thought I would never have to do since I went wireless.

      I used the out-of-the-box software for the MediaMVP just long enough to get really annoyed by it (about 10 minutes), then went to their website and downloaded the latest beta. Tons of improvement, but it still has quite a ways to go. As the parent poster said, navigating mp3's is a real pain -- if you are 75% down a long list of directories, open a subdirectory, then hit back, you are at the top of the long list again. One thing they added in the beta was using the numeric buttons as percentages of the list, so the '8' key moves you 80% of the way down the list. Better, but a "remember where you were" would be so much nicer.

      I suppose that what I really need to do is spend some time on my PC organizing directories and playlists so they can be easily navigated remotely.

      I haven't tried the Internet radio feature in the beta, but I'm dragging cable this weekend so I can give the video streaming a good test.

      For the record, I am using an ATI TV Wonder card on my PC hooked up to basic cable and the Beyond TV 3 PVR software for recording and I'm very happy with that setup.

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
    3. Re:Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      That's sensible. Wait til the technology market stabilizes. Always something better coming down the pike, and cheaper, too. I'm still getting by with my Compaq portable, because the laptop sector of the market is nowhere near enough mature. I mean, they don't really have biometrics down yet.

    4. Re:Hauppage MediaMVP or wait a while by cmpalmer · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Just a followup on my own post -- don't know if anyone cares or not...

      I decided to not run the cat5 and instead upgraded to 802.11g and rearranged my setup. Video streaming is working great so far, even when someone is watching TV or browsing on the server computer. The MediaMVP UI still sucks, but it does what it needs to do and the picture quality on my 42" rear projection HDTV is acceptible (not archive quality, but definitely watchable quality). Any problems with quality are purely due to the source recordings and not to the MediaMVP box as the same files burned to DVD look exactly the same.

      I also set-up the Internet radio functions with a random selection of stations found on Shoutcast and was quite impressed with the audio quality, but then I'm no audiofile and am easy to please. They certainly sound better through my surround sound system than they do on my PC speakers. It can't handle RealAudio streams and the station must have a single URL that directly accesses the stream (which can be hard to find for some stations, the Shoutcast ones you can just right-click on play or listen and add the station to the MMVP favorites share).

      A few more gripes about the MediaMVP UI. There are no useful status indicators (connecting, buffering, etc.), so when you select a radio station, you just have to wait 5-30 seconds to see if it connects. If it doesn't, you never know, you just have to try another one. Secondly, the beta SW I'm running has hung up twice and got in a weird state once (could navigate, but couldn't play anything). Power on/off "fixed" it both times. The colors and contrast are a bit harsh, too, so I worry a bit about burn-in. It does have a screensaver, but I'm paranoid. When listening to MP3 or Internet radio, I just start it playing, then turn off the TV...

      --
      -- stream of did I lock the front door consciousness
  5. What would be really awesome by foidulus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Would be something that not only streams music, but can also stream karaoke! Think about it, it would be so awesome if you could go to the iTunes music store from your laptop, d/l a song(normal version, plus karoake file with lyrics and timing, and even music video if appropriate, or you could do like the karaoke bars do in Japan and just put generic videos of people on the screen), then send it up on your bigscreen tv(and nice speakers) using an airport express kind of device. The sales of songs to drunk people on the iTunes music store would go through the roof! I mean, if you really want a song, what are you going to do, go to a p2p network to try to find a legit karaoke version or just go to the iTMS(since you will probably already have iTunes open) and buy the song.
    Come on Steve, lead the pack!

  6. yer whAT? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    hold...your "lounge room"? is this where you lie around in your zoot suit, by any chance?

  7. Xbox by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Airport Express is nice because I can control it from the computer. I usually sit on the couch with the stereo going.

    However, my solution was a modded Xbox, which makes an excellent media center. It takes some soldering, but then the Xbox becomes a game/media center.

  8. OSS homebrew... by emphatic · · Score: 2, Informative

    i'm in the same boat. i have a huge collection of digital music (ripped all my CD's) that i want to play in different rooms. bonus points for my backyard patio for BBQ's.

    here is what i'm going to use:

    1) cheap laptops
    2) cheap wifi cards
    3) XMMS
    4) netjuke (for the main 'streaming' app)
    5) LIRC (linux infrared remote control)
    6) XMMS-LIRC plugin

    this way, i'll have a remote to control xmms from, i have access to all my tunes in one place (not in a separate database for each remote device) AND the laptops can act as photo frames when i'm not listening to tunes (screensaver w/ photos, etc).

    i've looked into every single one of those devices that we keep seeing and they all have either limiting features, or a high cost. also, many required a custom streaming app to be used on the main server application.

    i like netjuke, but if i don't like it, i can use some other web-based tool. i like xmms, but if i don't like it, i could use something else. control man... control :)

    1. Re:OSS homebrew... by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      I was headed down that road until I realized that the sound quality from those laptop soundchips wasn't going to get any better by hooking up to better and better speakers/amps. An external device with a good DSP is worth it.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  9. Creative Sound Blaster Wireless Music by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I recently picked up one of these from the local CompUSA; it works beautifully and the [RF not IR!] lcd remote is just awesome.
    Creative Sound Blaster Wireless Music
    It's fairly pricey - running $200 - but [in my opinion] worth it. It works with your [existing?] WiFi network, which is convenient as well.
    Just my $0.02. :)

  10. Slimdevices' Squeezebox by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 3, Informative

    As I've mentioned before, I purchased one of these recently and I can't recommend it more highly. It plays every music format I can think of, using the server computer to resample obscure ones into a format it understands, on the fly. It can read and save Winamp playlist files, for convenience, and it can play streamed content off of the Internet. There are even plugins written that allow you to browse the Shoutcast.com streams and Internet Music Archive, and play those streams, all from the player's interface. And yes, the server software can interface with iTunes, and I imagine can play iTunes-purchased songs.

    My only gripe is that the software seems less stable than it could be under all circumstances, but I run the nightly builds, so I can't really complain. =)

    I think the thing that sets the Squeezebox apart from many of the other devices out there is its interface. Although a computer is required for the backend, you need never actually deal with the SlimServer program if you don't want to; almost every bit of configuration and management can be done from the player, with the remote. This is a big selling point for me, as it completely eliminates the need for me to have any electronics around aside from the Squeezebox itself and the stereo.

    I should also mention that the software supports synchronization between different players, and that there's a GUI Java player (SoftSqueeze) that can run on any computer so that you can synchronize that computer with any number of hardware players. I know this is functional because I did it myself, just this week while I was doing chores around the house.

    Anyway, that's my reasoning. I love the thing, and would gladly buy it again in a heartbeat. There are going to be many networked media players, but for me, the interface and the server software definitely tip the scales in favor of the Squeezebox.

    1. Re:Slimdevices' Squeezebox by Stinking+Pig · · Score: 1

      There is nothing better out there, bar none.

      However, it can't play the encrypted stuff from Apple unless it's running on an Apple. Don't look at Slim Devices, you're the one who bought DRM.

      --
      "Nothing was broken, and it's been fixed." -- Jon Carroll
  11. you're missing the control aspect by RMH101 · · Score: 1

    ...unless you're doing it via a wifi laptop, which is overkill. the slimp3 devices et al add the option of hifi-like controls, something that's glaringly absent in apple's new offering. i don't want to have to leave my laptop on or at home when i'm out so the missus can stream audio - i want a small device with a "PLAY" button on it and an LED display of track names.

  12. SliMP3 by stephend · · Score: 1

    I have the SliMP3, the wired precursor to the Squeezebox and reviewed it on mywebsite.

    In summary, I think it's great. My main complaint when I got it was the price, but the Squeezebox now costs less than the SliMP3.

  13. To TV or not to TV by grefft · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The problem that I've found with most of the remote streaming devices is that they need to have a television nearby to control them. As a person who finds television mindnumbing and don't even own one, is there a good streaming product that doesn't need a TV at all? Perhaps one with it's own graphics display to show cover art when browsing?

  14. Squeezebox by real+gumby · · Score: 2, Informative

    I have several of the predecessor device to the squeezebox, the SliMP3. It's great. Even has a high WAF -- my wife asked me to put one in her office too.

    Oh yea, it can read your iTunes DB so it knows your songlists and shoutcast radio stations and the like. The server software is all GPLed so you can tweak it (the guys at slimdevices integrate lots of user-contributed changes). It can't play your iTMS songs though unless you know how to use google. For that, your only alternative is the Apple device.

    They're easy to use, quite reliable, and plug straight into the stereo. What more is there to say about it?

    All in all, a real winner.

  15. Access required by Hig · · Score: 1

    I have been using a laptop around the house with a wi-fi (802.11b) connection to a PC upstairs.As the PC was located in the backroom I could get a great signal down to the bottom of my garden (about 25 meters). All my tunes available, great. Then, broadband became available in my area (north west UK) so the two PC set-up evolved into a wf-fi network complete with access-point and ADSL modem. The downside is that the phoneline comes into the front of the house so that's where the modem and access point live. The signal has now degraded such that I'm considering another access point upstairs to serve the back garden (it's still great around the house). I'm also thinkinig of getting one of those USB FM-transmitters, not unlike those used with the iPod. The plan is to have a cheap radios around the house (esp. the bathroom) that can tune into the signal and I can ditch the laptop except as a juke-box front-end. Has anyone else used such a transmitter with any success? My wi-fi based music collection has been a hit when friends come around as the playlist allows everyone to queue tunes instead of being subjected to my Hawkind collection :-)

  16. Prismiq by stinkwinkerton · · Score: 3, Informative

    I use the prismiq and like it a lot. Unfortunately, you have to have a television hooked up to it, and the media interface isn't the best in the world. However, they run linux on it, it is wired or wireless (your wireless card), they publish the source, it can play internet radio, rhapsody, mp3, slideshows, divx, vobs, and other .avi, you can program your own plugins for decoding, and is, in general, pretty cool. And surf the web. From what I understand, the PC does most of the transcoding then sends it to the media player. Bunch of good reviews from various magazine sources. Check out www.prismiq.com and www. prismiq.org. And, no, I don't work for the company.

    --
    "Look! There! Evil, pure and simple from the Eighth Dimension!" --Buckaroo Banzai
  17. iPod & iTrip by Mark+Hood · · Score: 1

    And just tune your stereo to a quiet FM slot... (you do have an integrated receiver, don't you? :) )

    You have the iPod in your hand or by your sofa, and can do much more with it than with most remotes (set up playlists, choose the next album, see what song's currently playing, etc). You don't need the TV on to listen to music, which is a plus.
    You can even leave the iPod in a dock charging, or pass it around people at a party to 'add a few songs to the playlist' - much neater than most solutions.

    Otherwise - If you want to see what you're doing, you need a very smart remote (Sony Multi_CD changers upload the CD list to the remote so you can pick a CD from a list, I don't know of any 'music streamers' that do this) or a link into your TV to show the track info.

    If you're happy with 'next track' and nothing else, you can manage with something like this.

    Mark

    --
    Liked this comment? Why not buy me something nice
  18. xbox! by muggy2 · · Score: 1

    My remote media player of choice is an xbox running Xbox Media Centre.

    Get a cheap 2nd hand xbox & DVD remote and away you go. Stream music & videos from your server elsewhere (yes, it even supports ogg!). Also supports streaming media for the occasional radio station. Very impressive indeed - I can't praise it enough.

  19. Dlink products by the_hose · · Score: 1

    Dlink appears to have several products that may be of interest here, has anyone used these?

    Specifically, they have two "wireless audio adapters":
    http://www.dlink.com/products/category .asp?cid=7#c id_70 ...as well as a product that looks like the bee's knees - the "Wireless Media Player" supporting wired & wireless, and video formats including xvid! And, it looks like it's only $200.
    http://www.dlink.com/products/?pid=318

    1. Re:Dlink products by bluGill · · Score: 1

      D-Link is to be avoided by linux guys. The ACX driver guys said so. (look it up if you don't belive me) Thats reason enough in my book to avoid everything they do. (Not just the products that don't work, but even the ones that do)

    2. Re:Dlink products by the_hose · · Score: 1

      Well, I'm unlikely to avoid a mfr just "because the ACX driver guys said so". I'm not 100% certain what sort of sin they are accused of, but it appears to be a small squabble over a specific TI chip in one of their wireless cards that Dlink is unable/unwilling to provide driver authors with details on. I sympathize, but given that it's a localized issue with a viable reverse-engineering effort, it seems a bit petty to boycott the rest of Dlink's perfectly adequate products.

      If I've overlooked something more serious, by all means expalin yourself. In the absence of more damning material, however, I'll continue to use Dlink equipment. What's my alternative, Linksys and Netgear? (See recent hubbub over router insecurities and the totally inappropriate responses of both those companies).

      FWIW, I think we have a better chance of seeing truly open media platforms comming from networking equipment manufacturers than from AV equipment manufacturers...

  20. Cheap old computer by ParadoxDruid · · Score: 1

    My desktop is in my bedroom, and houses my entire media collection. But I wanted music throughout the house.

    So down in the family room, I set up an old computer, with a set of good speakers and a PCI TV-out card (thank you Froogle!). I then slapped a 802.11b card into the old box and viola-- I can play music streamed off my computer and watch videos on my TV (occasional lag on large videos-- I should upgrade to 802.11g).

    As for a remote control? Froogle and eBay came to the rescue. I now have an old AST/Logitech Computer IR remote control. There's quite a few freee IR remote control programs floating around, so it was no worry I couldn't get any software with it.

    It's a great setup, and it cost me only ~$120. (I already had the old computer and speakers, so I needed a TV-out card, a wireless adapter, and the remote control).

    --
    This statement is solely an opinion. Kindly take it as such in all cases.
  21. I do this with my PocketPC by Marxist+Hacker+42 · · Score: 1

    On my IPAQ, it's just a matter of creating a shortcut to the shared folder behind the firewall on my 802.11b setup. The IPAQ has a headphone out, and I use Windows Media Player to manage the playlists and serve the content to whatever stereo I want.

    --
    SJW: a person who perceives an injustice, and while correcting it, commits a greater injustice.
  22. what I really want.... by dmjunkie · · Score: 1

    Ok...I love my IPOD....in the car and at the gym! What I don't love is my IPOD at home. I too have all my music on my PC and can play it just fine when I am on my pc. But I want it everywhere in my house. Having it stream off my computer is ok with me, having to GO TO MY PC to change the music is not ok.

    The airport express seems like a steping stone to something greater. I always do a ton of research before I buy any technology. I waited a year for the IPOD, and it has proven to be the best! Those other products mentioned just seem to fall short. I want something where I can control my music easily anywhere in the house.

    The only thing I have found so far is something called a zone player and controller from Sonos www.sonos.com. However, is it real, or is it just a fancy website with great photoshoped images? Why hasn't apple done something like this, or is that what they are planning? I have a hard time even considering a product from a company I haven't heard of. Does anyone else know anything about Sonos? Are they legit? Are there any other companies doing something like what they claim to have?

    1. Re:what I really want.... by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

      I'll pitch the Squeezebox some more..

      What exactly do you mean by controlling your music easily from anywhere in the house? The Squeezebox player can be completely controlled with only a remote control (no TV necessary), and it even has a mini-stereo (i.e. headphone) jack if you don't want to deal with a big stereo system. Perfect for sitting outside by the pool or something.

      If you mean having multiple players working together, the Squeezebox does that too. You can have two or more players linked in any configuration, and the SlimServer software will treat all of the linked players as one unit; they share playlists and play controls, so pausing one will pause all of the others. In fact, you can use the Java Squeezebox emulator running on a computer as a member in a group, or even have groups of exclusively emulated players. I use this functionality on occasion to have the same music playing on my stereo, my computer, and the cheapie media computer in my garage, and I can control all of them from any location.

      Or, if you want even more control, the SlimServer software serves a web-based playlist and configuration interface, which you can access from anywhere on the Internet, of course. They even have a handheld template, which is plenty functional on my Axim's web browser and allows me to control all of those linked players without being near any of them.

      In fact, from checking on that Sonos product you linked to, I think I've already got the same functionality with my synchronized players and PocketPC to control them. Of course, I do have to have a wireless network, but I had one of those already anyway. =)

    2. Re:what I really want.... by dmjunkie · · Score: 1

      Ok..so the scenario I want to address is the one where, like you, I have all my music on my computer.

      I have speakers and some sort of box (squeezbox or sonos or TBD) in a bunch of rooms. I am sitting on my couch, and want to play some music. What I want to be able to do is, from my couch, pick up some sort of remote and browse through all my music (basically an ipod in the hand). From that remote, I want to be able to play music throughout my house, and if I decide to, also play different music in different rooms, setup playlists, ect.

      Is Squeezebox able to do all of this out of the box? It sounds like you setup your own wireless network with a PocketPC to basically control the music that is on your hard drive. Does it work well, or is it truely a custom job that requires a lot of setup and personal configuration? I want something advanced enough that I can do what I want, but also simple enough out of the box, that all my friends and family can use it.

    3. Re:what I really want.... by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

      The key is really not the Squeezebox, but the SlimServer software that it connects to. It keeps track of all the players connected to it, and allows you to manage playlists individually or for a synchronized group from a central location.

      To answer your question, I'd like to describe how I use my setup. The Squeezebox has an LED display (2x40, I believe) that is easily readable from across the room. I can sit down and pick up the remote, turn on the Squeezebox, and then either load a saved playlist, browse through my music, search for a specific song, or load up an Internet radio stream. All of these activities are intuitive and simple (the search functionality uses the number buttons on the remote to input letters in the same way as cell phones without predictive spelling), and anybody should be able to handle loading up a playlist with a quick introduction.

      This is all possible with one Squeezebox and the included remote. For more complex configurations, you can use the web-based frontend that the SlimServer software provides, which allows you to manage playlists and control all connected devices, either synchronized or independently. For example, I can do a search based on artist name (which is easier with actual keys), and browse through the results to form a particular playlist, which I can then save to my Saved Playlists folder and load into any Squeezebox. If I have linked players, they will share a playlist and controls; if I do not have them linked, they will have individual playlists and be able to be controlled independently. Also, the web-based interface includes all of the functionality of the remote, such as play, pause, next track, on/off, etc.

      But you don't have to take my word for any of this. The SlimServer software is written in Perl and available under the GPL from SlimDevices for download here. There is also a Java Squeezebox emulator called SoftSqueeze available here, which completely emulates the interface of an actual Squeezebox and is indistinguishable to the server. Download the server software, play around with having a SoftSqueeze player running on a couple of computers, and see how you like it. There's also an active community of third-party developers writing plugins and fixing bugs, so if there's a particular feature you want, a helpful suggestion on the mailing list might work wonders.

      Let me know if there's anything else you have questions about. I love my little toy, and am more than happy to extol its virtues at every opportunity. =)

    4. Re:what I really want.... by jacobdp · · Score: 1

      The Squeezebox has an LED display (2x40, I believe)

      The Squeezebox does not have an LED. It's a VFD - Vacuum Flourescent Display - which is way, way brighter and more readable than an LED or backlit LCD.

      Of course, it's way more expensive as well; the one in the Squeezebox costs almost $100 in single quantity. Well worth it, though.

    5. Re:what I really want.... by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

      Fair enough.

      Thank you for the information. =)

    6. Re:what I really want.... by dmjunkie · · Score: 1

      ok...so I understand that the important thing is the software in being able to control the different devices. Once again though, you keep mentioning emulators and installing on a couple of computers. That does not seem to be an out-of-the-box solution. My mom, who has problems with VCRs sometimes, would not be able to use this. And you mention the squeezebox can be read across the room. I have a 30 foot living room. Even with 20/15 vision, I cannot see the displays on my other components.

      I decided to call Sonos support to see if they had any information, and talked to a guy named Dave who cleared a lot of this up. They too have software out of the box that can run on a PC, that sort of looks like a typical itunes/musicmatch/media player interface that can also control every zone player in the house and play music individually or synced in any or all zones.

      The really cool thing Dave told me is that you don't need to install the software at all (I don't like installing software if I don't have to). All you have to do is share your music folder on your computer or other network storage device, and then the controller will automatically find the music and allow you to control any of the zoneplayers right from the controller.

      He said, I could setup the entire thing in 20 minutes or less. He said, all I have to do is plug one zoneplayer directly into my network, then put the other zone players anywhere in the house. All they need to do is have power and speakers. Then just share your music folder or install the software. Then there is a short 1 minute setup to associate the controller with the zone players. He said I could then just sit on my couch with the controller, and play different music in any of the rooms, or sync any or all to each other. By the way, I also asked about his mention of just needing a zone player and speaker in other rooms, and what I didn't realize is that I don't need an amp in every room that has these. Although it has line outs for any room with an amp, it also has its own built in amp that can power my speakers if I want. very cool!

      Sounds like the setup you have does something very similar to this, except that this is out-of-the-box and I don't need to look across the room to see what is playing or is available for me to play. It sounds like you know your stuff though when it comes to this. I would love for you to call their support number (800-680-2345) or look at their site and tell me if I am indeed missing something.

    7. Re:what I really want.... by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

      It sounds like the Sonos setup is what you're looking for, then. I like the Squeezebox very much, but I don't want to persuade you to buy something you don't need.

      Out of the box, you get the Squeezebox player and a remote. Once you've installed the server software, you can listen to any music files you've made available on the Squeezebox. This is all made very simple by the instructions and interfaces. For a more extensive system like Sonos sells, you would need either multiple Squeezeboxes (at $200-250 a pop), or computers with the emulated software on them; either would work, and then you could control everything from any of the Squeezeboxes or any web browser, including one on a handheld device. This is not out-of-the-box functionality, and although it is not really complicated, it sounds like a more complex setup than you'd like to have.

      I do wish you good luck with whatever setup you decide on; you should submit a review if it ends up meeting your needs well. =)

    8. Re:what I really want.... by dmjunkie · · Score: 1

      Thanks...I will have to do some more research. I guess different needs call for different solutions.

      I will post a review on whatever I decide on getting.

      I think one thing we have in common though is the vision to see that this is the next big thing. Digital Music in your entire house is the next big arena for companies to tackle. It is evident by what some of the companies are starting to come out with, that they are testing the waters (like Apple Airport Express). Seems like Sonos decided not to test the waters, but just jump right in.

      I am sure it is the next logical step for Squeezebox to expand their technology to do what Sonos is doing.

    9. Re:what I really want.... by FreeForm+Response · · Score: 1

      I'd love to see it. I think the Squeezeboxes are too expensive to put one in every room just yet, but if they can bring the price down (by introducing a headless version perhaps), they'd have a winning setup.

  23. eBay'ed PowerBook As Remote Control by cmholm · · Score: 1
    In my case, I've been weighing Airport Express+iTunes 4.6 vs. a Squeezebox, and I wanted to know whether the boatload of various 128, 192, and 256 kbs mpeg files I've got were going to sound good enough to bother streaming to my mid-range stereo. In addition, if I didn't get a Squeezebox, I wanted a cheap and moderately non-butt ugly way of remote controlling iTunes.

    Fortunately I'd already picked up a Powerbook 3400 on eBay ($65) and an Oronoco Wavelan card from a garage sale ($5) as a Debian/PPC plaything.

    On the MacOS 9 boot partition, I added iTunes 1.1, IE 5, the Macast mp3 player, and "iHam on iRye". If I could run iTunes 4.5 on the Powerbook as well as the iMac in the upstairs office, my job would be done, but I was left with trying out a number of streaming servers. Many of the servers on OSX use iTunes as a backend (nicecast, for instance), which sucks up added CPU cycles on my 400MHz iMac, and with the three I tried, I couldn't quite figure out the correct URL to connect to from the Powerbook. I looked at gnump3d, which doesn't use iTunes, but haven't tried it yet. I had played with the Squeezebox' server, the slimserver, a year ago, so gave the update another try. The instructions provided a URL format even I could grok, and the resulting stream played on both iTunes 1.1 and Macast on the Powerbook. Using IE (or whatever browser), I can surf to the Slimserver's web interface to select playlists, and after plugging the Powerbook's line out into my stereo, the result wasn't too bad.

    What makes a really slick remote control is iHam on iRye, an iTunes 4.x remote control that works on MacOS 9.x and X. Not Windows, for better or worse. It provides an iTunes-like interface, and it seems I can even select webcasts. Provided that the Airport Express' stereo line out provides a signal of at least the same quality as the PB 3400, I may have found my ultimate solution.

    --
    Luke, help me take this mask off ... Just for once, let me butterfly kiss you with my own eyes.
  24. Roko and Play@TV by Christopher_G_Lewis · · Score: 1

    I've been looking at the Roku HD1000 and the Play@TV NMP-4000.

    Basically, I'm looking at archiving my 1,800+ cd on to hard drive and storing them in a box (well, lots of boxes) some where and not having to go fetch the one I want to play. Pictures on the TV would be nice, but I want the TV to display the artist/album list. Playing video would be nice, but not necessary.

    I'm also not interested in wireless, just wired (I ran cat5e to every room in the house :-).

    The HD1000 actually supports HiDef TV at 720p and 1080i. Supposed to be quite nice for showing off your tv. Not so sure how it works with Audio stuff. Linux kernel, developer SDK, looks cool :-) Doesn't look like it's got a lot of umph, however (see the referenced about creating a swap file on a CF card - yuk).

    The Play@TV NMP-4000, while having a crappy name, looks like it supports the audio stuff better. It's highest resolution is S-Video out, but that's OK.

    Both support digital audio out, which is cool.
    I certianly would like a comparison site on these, but haven't found any.

    Or if either company wants some free advertising, send me a demo unit and I'll write something up!

  25. Onkyo Amplifiers by JohnEsch · · Score: 1

    Onkyo amplifiers have the ability to plug directly into your computer network. You then have full control And full Audiophile sound from your system. It is awesome and thats from experience, not hearsay. All the way from South Africa