Slashdot Mirror


HP Recall on 900,000 Notebooks

phycoman writes "900,000 HP and Compaq laptops have potential memory issues and are being recalled. The RAM chips from four manufacturers can possibly lead to system corruption and lockups. The affected notebooks are Compaq Evo Notebook N610c, Compaq Evo Notebook N610v, Compaq Evo Notebook N620c, Compaq Evo Notebook N800c, Compaq Evo Notebook N800v, Compaq Evo Notebook N800w, Compaq Evo Notebook N1000c, Compaq Evo Notebook N1000v, Compaq Presario 1500, Compaq Presario 2800, Compaq Presario x1000, Compaq Presario x1200, HP Compaq Business Notebook nx7000 and HP Pavilion zt3000. As a result, HP has created a website whick allows users to download a program to test for faulty RAM chips."

30 of 224 comments (clear)

  1. HP by mfh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I dislike HP products. We have a scanner, a camera and some other doo-dads at the office, and they all use HP technology. The problem? HP installs a crapflood of memory resident programs to handle even the most mundane tasks that could easily be handled at runtime. I would never personally buy something from HP because of their strange software policy. This is essentially Darwin in effect, folks. Nothing to see here, move along. :-)

    --
    The dangers of knowledge trigger emotional distress in human beings.
    1. Re:HP by JPriest · · Score: 4, Interesting
      P installs a crapflood of memory resident programs to handle even the most mundane tasks

      Funny you mention that, a just threw a default install of XP Pro on an old 450MHz AMD box next to me. I was amazed to see on boot it used only 56 megs of RAM. Having mostly used OEM versions, I always figured XP was more bloated than that.

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:HP by Realistic_Dragon · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Just like the real player thing*, it seems that Linux users get the better deal on drivers and crapware.

      HP Linux drivers (for the printers at least, I havent used the camera ones) are solid, HP backed, support things like the card readers and have no crapware attached.

      There seem to be quite a few cases where Linux drivers and software are actually _better_ than the Windows versions.

      *Real player for UNIX is a pretty decent piece of software.

      --
      Beep beep.
  2. Channelling Nelson by philoticjane · · Score: 5, Funny

    /me points at HP

    HA ha... /me looks at apple.com... scrolls to bottom... "Extended iBook Logic Board..."

    Oh. Damn.

    --
    Cthulu saves... in case he gets hungry later.
    ::helping geeks get laid since 1983::
  3. Say what you will but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's nice to see a company admitting there is a problem AND fixing it.

    Wouldn't suprise me if someone was threatning to blow the whistle though...

  4. HP= bad by spacerodent · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Every time I've bought an HP product I've regreted it. I even got one of their dvd burners for a mere $99 year before last (when they were ~$300 normally) and then when it broke only 3 weeks after I bought it they said it wasn't covered under warrenty. They claimed that it was covered for 1 year or until they decide the product is obsolete and no longer will be supported. Even though i'd just bought it they had decided it was too long to support any longer dispite the fact that it was still on store shelves. Then last year I got a HP 935 digital camera as a gift. It was a good little camera except for one thing. The batteries only lasted about 2-3 picutres at a time. You could wait for the amperage to build back up between sets of 2-3 pictures (usually a few minutes) but thats totally unacceptable to most people. Terrible designs and business decisions like these have destroyed any support I had left for HP. I know it's HP-Compaq now but hell would freeze over before I buy anything off them.

    1. Re:HP= bad by rasteroid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I can't believe this, a company is proactive in issuing a product recall and all you can do is think about all your bad experiences that you've had in the past? It seems to me like the problems you list are not uncommon across almost every company selling tech products across the industry. In any case, your post is quite irrelevant, because it appears that the problem regarding the memory is an industry-wide problem, not an HP-specific one.

      I take it as a good thing that HP is first to recall such a large volume of shipped products, whereas look what their main competitors in the laptop segment are up to - Dell is still "evaluating" and I've no idea what IBM is up to.

      It's a shame that the recall isn't issued by the memory/chipset manufacturers themselves, since they are primarily responsible for the flaw, even though laptop vendors in general are also somewhat responsible for letting the flaw go unnoticed for so long.

      HP doesn't have a perfect track record, but give credit where credit is due. A company that issues a comprehensive product recall, despite it being an "industry-wide problem" and despite it probably being something relatively minor/obscure (which is why it escaped detection for so long), is one that to me cares more for their products than what you've described above.

      I myself am primarily a Dell customer (which isn't saying much), but I give HP the edge in being more proactive in this particular case. For all you know, they could have just shrugged their shoulders and pointed fingers at the memory/chipset manufacturers.

      Regarding monetary losses, I'm sure there is some sort of sharing of cost-of-replacement between the various companies responsible for this product recall.

    2. Re:HP= bad by macrom · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm one for one with my HP/Compaq experiences. At a past job, I had a series of Evos, first the N600c, then the N620c (or was it the 610?). The first batch of notebooks were pretty good, but once they upgraded us to the 620's a year later, all hell broke loose. We (meaning most of the 20-odd developers) all had USB issues with external drives, blue screens, lockups, etc. I personally had my RAM modules replaces 2 or 3 times, along with my system board in the same amount. Other minor problems existed and all Compaq would do under the corporate warranty agreement was throw replacement parts at the problem. It's finally good to see they are starting to acknowledge SOMETHING is wrong, though I have a feeling that it's more than the 3rd-party memory they're blaming it on.

      Now, when I lost my job back in November, I searched around for a good, solid laptop and settled on the ZT3000, which I customized through HP's shopping site. I had a few problems with blue screens when I installed 3rd party RAM (and these problems were well "documented" and discussed on x1000formus. Swaping the memory around the 2 slots fixed the problem. Otherwise, this laptop has been the best machine I've ever owned. It's decently fast for compiling code in Visual Studio .NET, it has a gig of RAM, a WUXGA screen, a nice keyboard, it's thin, light and gets good battery life. I worked a contract for a few months where a set of office mates had these machines (one had the x1000) and they seemed to like the laptops as much as myself. I will freely admit that HP and Compaq have a bit of a reputation in the computer industry, but so far these machines seem to be pretty solid.

      Anyhow, that's my story for the HP/Compaq quality debate!

  5. Missed it by Papa+Legba · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Sometimes a guy lucks out. I bought a 1500 not to long ago. I got it with the minimum amount of RAM in it. I wanted a gig of RAM but HP wanted almost $700 for that upgrade. I decided that upgrading the screen was far more important as I could not alter that myself later at a cheap price.

    As soon as I got the laptop I orderd a gig of third party RAM from an online vendor, total cost less than $200. Installed it right away and now I don't have this problem and never have had it.

    Moral of the story: Sometime it pays to be a cheap bastard.

    --
    Papa Legba come and open the gate
    1. Re:Missed it by anticypher · · Score: 5, Interesting

      So you take your original HP 128 Meg sodimm card, mail it back to them, get a new one, and a 32Mbyte USB flash memory key with an HP logo on it for the cost of postage.

      It pays to be a cheap bastard, but one should be a greedy cheap bastard whenever possible.

      the AC

      --
      Hemos is like...sci-fi fans;he thinks technology is cool, but he hasn't bothered to understand the science it's based on
    2. Re:Missed it by vijaya_chandra · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So you take your original HP 128 Meg sodimm card, mail it back to them, get a new one, and a 32Mbyte USB flash memory key with an HP logo on it for the cost of postage.

      A really greedy cheap bastard would have sold it as soon as the card was out of the box

  6. Memory replacement, not recall by Covener · · Score: 4, Informative

    Laptops aren't being recalled, memory is. Writeup is too sensationalized

    1. Re:Memory replacement, not recall by JPriest · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If you open up the laptop to replace the RAM yourself don't you void the warranty?

      --
      Saying Java is nice because it works on all OS's is like saying that anal sex is nice because it works on all genders.
    2. Re:Memory replacement, not recall by crow · · Score: 3, Informative

      Just like an automotive recall, there's one part that's bad, and they ask you to bring it in to be replaced at their cost (parts and labor). I once had a recall on my car to replace the radiator cap. They mailed me the cap and said to take it to a dealer if I didn't want to swap it myself (apparently the original cap wouldn't release pressure if it overheated).

      A recall doesn't mean they'll replace the whole thing, just the bad part. This is a recall.

  7. Intel chipset to fault? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Hard to believe that the memory makers who hold 70% of the world market fail to produce their stuff to specs.

    Looks more like a flaw with the Intel chipsets in those notebooks, but that would be much more expensive to replace.

    If you're affected, check whether the new RAM modules aren't slower than the ones you're replacing.

  8. Now for the other manufacturers... by La+Camiseta · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Let's see how long it takes for the other manufacturers to get on the bandwagon. Especially Toshiba. They only use Samsung memory.

    (that may have been what's been causing those random lockups on my laptop. Now I know...)

  9. free 32MB flash drive by justforaday · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm surprised nobody's mentioned the free 32MB flash drive you get for their screwup.

    HP will provide one free 32-megabyte USB Flash Device for each notebook identified as having affected memory module(s). To receive this incentive, customers must complete all of the following steps for each notebook:

    Order the replacement memory module(s) through this Web site.

    Replace the affected memory module(s) without the assistance of a service partner or HP.

    Return the affected memory module(s) as directed.


    I get the feeling there're going to be a lot of flash drive RAIDs being made out of these...

    --
    I'll turn into a supernova and burn up everything. Well I'll turn into a black little hole and you'll turn into string.
  10. Downtime anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "HP's replacement program will allow a customer to receive a small kit, containing a screwdriver as well as instructions for the customer on how to replace the faulty DRAM modules, which may include 128MB, 256MB, and 512MB versions. The customer can then ship the DRAM to HP using a return envelope and receive a new module for free."

    Sooo... if I read that right (keying in on the last phrase) 900,000 laptops are supposed to go without any memory while the old memory gets shipped back, the order processed (assuming they have 1-2 million proper mem modules already on-hand) and the new memory then being shipped back. That's a ton of culmulative downtime- Ouch!

    1. Re:Downtime anyone? by silas_moeckel · · Score: 4, Informative

      Nope HP ships the part you replace and then you ship back the defective part and they ship you a 32 meg usb flash drive for your trouble and returning the bad ram.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
  11. Not the real HP anymore by uncadonna · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Everything I've encountered from HP in the last several years (certainly anything post-Carly) has been amazingly failure-prone. I've been foolish enough, on the strength of old habits and low prices, to buy a laser printer, and a desktop machine from them since then. Both failed very quickly. The institutional setting where I work has a departmental color laser, much higher end than I've ever purchased for myself. Its downtime approaches 50%; it has no less than three types of chronic problems (paper feed, intermittent connectors, and some peculiar software glitch than can be power cycled away). We are looking for a replacement and will not consider an HP machine. I paid out of pocket for a cheap USB lexmark laser in my office so I could get listings and get my work done.

    This may be a coincidence but I doubt it.

    I'm old enough to remember a time when HP products were ubiquitous in labs and scientists' offices. In those days they were paragons of good design and reliability.

    Folger's used to be a brand associated with gourmet coffee. Once the brand got bought out, it was used in a sort of goodwill mining operation to sell vile instant coffee crystals.

    This is the way of the publicly traded corporation with its short time horizons. A respected brand is just a resource to be cashed in.

    --
    mt
    1. Re:Not the real HP anymore by Foolhardy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I remember when HP used to represent quaility too. HP oscilliscopes, spectrum analyzers, calculators were sought after. There is old HP equipment still in use around here from 20+ years ago that still works great; pieces of equipment that have never had parts break.
      Of recent products: I have an HP48GX calc that is working beautifully. I have a cheapo deskjet printer that works OK; the ink prices are murder and a third party cartridge seems to have plugged some the heads causing streaks. It's still much better than the Epson color stylus 2 I had before. I also have a ZT1000 notebook computer, about 2 years old. I've had a few issues, but overall it is very stable.
      I agree that their quaility has gone down a great deal recently (with Carly+merger mostly).

      About companies that don't care about long-term reputation, only short-term profits: I worry that it is going that way too. Still, the implicit purpose of most corps is to make money for the investors.

    2. Re:Not the real HP anymore by woobieman29 · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I would have to agree with parent poster. I have used HP products over the years (Have a ScanJet 4P and LaserJet 5 that have been years-long workhorses) but my recent dealings with them on a Pavilion notebook have forced me to swear off ever buying HP/Compaq again.

      The machine in question is a Pavilion N5190 that I bought in October of 2000 for ~$2500 US. Luckily I bought an extended warranty through the dealer when I purchased this thing, because it was in and out of the shop constantly for 2 new power supplies, a new motherboard, and other issues. Note that I have had over a dozen notebooks in my time, including IBM, Fujitsu, Toshiba and Dell and I have never had even 25% of the problems that I have had with this HP Pavilion. Thank goodness that the extended dealer warranty provided for a loaner, or I would have been really screwed. As soon as the extended warranty expired, the machine stopped booting again with what appears to be a power supply issue. Since it was out of warranty I decided to pop the case off to have a look, and I immediately noticed that the hard drive is prominently marked with a sticker that says "USED". I was (and still am) FURIOUS as this was supposed to be a new machine, and the hard disc had never been replaced. When I called HP for an explanation I got bounced around to the wrong departments for DAYS until I finally got a hold of someone in the "Quality Department". This person told me that it is common practice for HP/Compaq to use USED parts that have been tested as good in their new notebooks, and that this is mentioned in their warranty paperwork. I protested that 1) The verbage regarding used parts is buried in the fine print of the warranty terms which 2) a customer will never see until they have already purchased the machine. At this point, I am wondering how many other parts in this $2500 "new" laptop are really USED.

      Call me crazy but I think this is wrong. If I am going to buy a NEW notebook, it is my expectation that all of the parts are new. I can buy machines that are refurbished if I want to, and spend a lot less money for the same machine. If a machine is being sold with USED parts in it, I feel that this should be prominently marked on the external packaging.

      How do you feel about this, Slashdot?

      --
      \/\/oobie
  12. From HP's website: by ikea5 · · Score: 5, Funny
    Program Highlights: The Memory Module Replacement Program showcases HP's unique capabilities to detect, and identify complex issues, and globally execute customized replacement programs.

    Translate: "We shipped some faulty chips, which caused bluescreens, now we will send a screw driver to everyone on our list so they can replace it themself"

  13. Why never to buy from HP by GreenPenInc · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wow, this comes right at the time when I'm buying my first laptop. Gather round and hear the sordid tale of their utter lack of customer service!

    The HP zt3000 model seemed to have the perfect balance of price and performance. I tried ordering one on their site, but since I didn't sign up simultaneously, it took me to a page where I couldn't check order status and I didn't get a confirmation email. So, I ordered my customized model over the phone the next day.

    Imagine my shock when I checked my confirmation email and found that the default configuration had been ordered instead -- $50 more expensive than my customized one, and less powerful to boot! I called back to correct it, and they said it wouldn't be a problem; they'd call *me* in 48 hours.

    48 hours and no phone call later, I called them back and was advised to cancel my order outright and place it again. I tried, but the screw-up order had placed a hold on the money, so I couldn't order again until it expired!

    At this point, their *original* mistake had cost me the better part of a week on a time-sensitive deal, so I figured I'd get them to pay for expedited shipping. Twice, I was told a supervisor would call me by such and such a time. When this failed to happen both times, I called again and requested to be put through to a supervisor. I told him what had happened and asked for free shipping so *they* could cover the mistake *they* made. And he wouldn't even give me that.

    So, to summarize, I made 13 phone calls, was told "don't call us, we'll call you" three times and it never happened, and they wouldn't even take action to correct *their* mistake which cost me all the time. At this point, I realized no laptop is worth all that crap.

    (Seems I've gotten a happy ending, though. I found a very comparable (slightly better) Dell Inspiron 8600 for slightly less, and by Googling I found a coupon for a not-insignificant 10% off! It'll arrive in a few weeks, and I can't wait to put Gentoo on it ;)

  14. HP=Pinto by CaptainFrito · · Score: 4, Funny
    "Laptops aren't being recalled, memory is. Writeup is too sensationalized"

    "Ford Pintos aren't being recalled, gas taks are. Writeup is too sensationalized"

    Uh-huh.

  15. In related news.... by commo1 · · Score: 3, Funny

    4,900,000 copies of Microsoft Windows software have potential memory leaking issues and are being kept on the marketplace. The Windows software from one manufacturer can possibly lead to system corruption, lockups and comprimised security of stored documents & personal information. The affected releases are: Longhorn (beta), all versions of XP, 2000, ME, 98SE, 98, 95OSR2, 95A, NT Workstation 4.0 & 3.X, Windows 3.x & Windows for Workgroups 3.x. All upgrade versions of the software is also affected. Windows versions below 3.0 are not affected. As a result, Microsoft has created a test which allows users to test for faulty software: If it says "Microsoft" on statup, it's defective. Microsoft officials insisted that the memory leaks were "features" intended to inform the user after approximately 300 lockups or the next release of the software (whichever comes first), the user should upgrade to the latest release.

  16. Not HP Specific by GarfBond · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If you believe them that is. Quoted from the eweek article:
    The problem is tied to the interaction of DRAM from several manufacturers and several chip sets, all designed by Intel Corp. The flaw, which could result in system lockups, is being solved through a comprehensive recall that could affect up to 900,000 of HP's notebooks, a company representative said. Although HP classified the problem as one that will affect the notebook PC industry as a whole, it appears that the company is the only one currently taking action. A representative from Dell Computer Corp. said that the company was "looking into it."
    Quoted from the HP site:
    During normal ongoing notebook testing, HP has identified a design flaw in certain industry-standard memory modules supplied by third parties that were shipped with some HP and Compaq notebooks and in memory accessories for these notebooks. Under certain conditions, these memory modules can cause the notebook to experience blue screens, intermittent lockups, or memory data corruption.
    As much as I hate HP, kudos to them for having the balls to do this, if this really *is* an industrywide problem. HP is the only place I've really noticed mentioning this though.
  17. Not HPs fault by phalse+phace · · Score: 4, Informative
    I just love how everyone's bashing HP for this flaw even if it isn't their fault.
    "The problem is tied to the interaction of DRAM from several manufacturers and several chip sets, all designed by Intel Corp."

    Shouldn't HP be commended instead since they're the only ones who are currently taking action to resolve this problem?

    "Although HP classified the problem as one that will affect the notebook PC industry as a whole, it appears that the company is the only one currently taking action. A representative from Dell Computer Corp. said that the company was "looking into it.""
  18. Sorry, no. by Kingfox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My employer purchased a few hundred of these laptops. We've been complaining to them and dropping evidence on their laps since the fall of 2002 that something was wrong. Now, nearly two years later, they finally admit that there's a problem. It's nice to see a company admitting that there is a problem and fixing it, it would have been nice to see a company admitting that there is a problem and fixing it in a timely fashion.

    These aren't laptops that they sold to consumers a few months ago. These are models that consumers have been suffering with for years, and being told that there is no problem.

  19. Always test the memory! by Doppler00 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Whenever I buy a new computer or new memory, I always run it through a memory tester I boot from a CD. It's good to run one of these for at least 24 hours. If you find any memory problems, you might want to return the product.

    It's also fun to benchmark it after the tests are done. I used SiSoftware Sandra BenchmarkHQ.

    One thing to look out for though is BIOS programs that load into memory addresses that will effect the test. I kept getting errors until I disabled my onboard IDE RAID controller, and then the memory checked out fine. I guess the controller was loading something into the memory and the test would read it back after the controller changed it.