Slashdot Mirror


The Black Plague Batted .500 Its Rookie Year

ElDuderino44137 writes "Hey, kids, got the summer blues? The CIA isn't the only one with a kids' page to keep you busy. The Centers for Disease Control have the full set of collectible infectious disease trading cards. Mix 'em, match 'em, trade 'em, recoil in abject horror from 'em."

31 of 74 comments (clear)

  1. Finally... by brilinux · · Score: 4, Funny


    Something to go with my stuffed microbes!

  2. I can hear it now... by hookedup · · Score: 4, Funny

    MOM! Tommy got Ebola again! Tell him to share!

  3. A new meaning of... by Leffe · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... gotta catch 'em all ;)

  4. Well... by daeley · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't know about you, but I am *so* not eating the bubblegum that comes with these!

    --
    I watched C-beams glitter in the dark near the Tannhauser gate.
  5. Criminal collectable cards by Bob_Robertson · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Here I thought that those "Most Awful Criminals" cards were in bad taste.

    Reading the back of the Anthrax card, it's just propaganda for kids to show mommy and daddy so they won't defund the CDC.

    Bob-

    --
    The Ludwig von Mises Institute. The reasoning individuals economics
    1. Re:Criminal collectable cards by MindStalker · · Score: 3, Insightful

      How is stating that anthrax has been used in bioterrorism propaganda. It really did happen you know.

  6. Doesn't this already go on? by RegalBegal · · Score: 2, Funny

    except it's with STDs.

    girl, you WISH i'd trade The Ninja for your Warts, get that thing away from me!!

    we could even incorporate it into a card game.

    I'll trade my level 34 Master Ninja for your 55 +strength Herpulox.

    get me some buttah baby i'm onna ROLL!!!

    --
    "It'll destroy you if you try to make it mean anything to anyone but yourself." - Henry Rollins
  7. Kids these days... by I_Love_Pocky! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Get all of the cool toys. Why didn't they have this when I was growing up?

  8. Anyone remember asking for the Plague? by Ieshan · · Score: 3, Funny

    Perhaps off topic, but does anyone else remember going to the bookstore during the Camus section of senior-year english class and asking for The Plague?

    1. Re:Anyone remember asking for the Plague? by Txiasaeia · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heh, I got you one better. One sociology class of mine had a required text on call at the library called "Sex in the Snow" (actual book, check it out on Amazon). We were forbidden by the prof to ask the librarians, "Do you have Sex in the Snow" or "Can I have Sex in the Snow" or "Can I check out Sex in the Snow" or any such variation. Turned out there was no bloody way of asking for the book without just writing down the call number.

      --
      Condemnant quod non intellegunt.
    2. Re:Anyone remember asking for the Plague? by LSD-25 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Why couldn't you say, "I'm looking for a book called 'Sex in the Snow.'"

  9. Pet Peeve by cephyn · · Score: 3, Informative

    No such thing as the "black plague" --

    There is the Black Death, referring to a specific pandemic of Bubonic Plague in Europe in 1347-1350.

    --
    Moo.
    1. Re:Pet Peeve by zaroastra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the mistake is classifying the black plague as bubonic plague. (a very common misconception because of what they have taught us in schools)
      I saw a program where they explained why the black plague of late middle ages couldn't have been the bubonic plague.
      The black plague simptoms and "modus operandi" was far more related to the haemorrhagic plague than bubonic plague.
      A fast google search rendered these items:
      Black Death blamed on man, not rats
      Bubonic plague didn't cause the Black Death
      But im sure that if you look further, you will find more info.

      --
      I'm trying to get modded "Interesting Flamebait Informative and Insightful Redundant Troll" *-* Please Help *-*
    2. Re:Pet Peeve by cephyn · · Score: 2, Insightful

      that second link tries to say it wasnt plague, but pretty much ends up saying it was -- they say the symptoms COULD be from plague but MIGHT not have been. And its been well documented that plague can EASILY spread from human to human, especially in pneumonic form. And plague infection could display symptoms very similar to hemo fever in septecemic form. bubonic plague is one type of infection from yersinia pestis. Pneumonic is a different one (lungs) and septecemic is the third (blood) -- septecemic has been documented as being the nastiest, killing 90% in 24-36 hours, causes bleeding like a hemo fever, and is passed through body fluids (like vomiting blood).

      So the articles are saying that the spread was too fast for plague, but there are types of plague infections which could do it. They say not enough rats died, but there are plenty of documented events of mass rat death during the Black Death. They wonder why it spread most on roads, well, rats often hid in wagons filled with hay or food, or crawled in leaving fleas behind, etc etc etc. And it may have spread animal to animal in the outlying areas, but animals don't often write things down. People do, and they concentrate on roads and towns.

      Those articles, IMO, are sketchy AT BEST.

      --
      Moo.
    3. Re:Pet Peeve by zaroastra · · Score: 2, Informative

      here, i even found you a paper on it!
      (proving that the black death was not the bubonic plague that is)

      --
      I'm trying to get modded "Interesting Flamebait Informative and Insightful Redundant Troll" *-* Please Help *-*
  10. Re:huh? by HyperbolicParabaloid · · Score: 2, Informative

    And did you know that it is not know for certain that "The Black Death" even was bubonic plague? Scientisits and historians now assume that the epidemic that swept through Europe was that disease, but since European medicine at the time was, shall we say, non-scientific, it is impossible to know with certainty what the diease really was. I believe (no, I can't cite any sources) that there are problems in the hisotical record with the bubonic plague theory, and even some other contenders for the actual cause of the epidemic.

    --


    -------------------------
    A person of moderate zeal
  11. Re:My own Pet Peeve by jmitchel!jmitchel.co · · Score: 2, Funny

    It's not at all certain that the black death was caused by the bubonic plague.

    There you go again, debasing our heros. Our children need diseases to aspire to.

  12. It's even factually correct. by devphil · · Score: 4, Informative


    More or less. The Black Death wiped out one-third to one-half of [any given European / West Asian / Middle Eastern geographical area], with the exceptions of Poland and Scotland, which didn't get touched.

    Something to tell the next kid you find singing "ring around the rosey," a nursery rhyme about the Plague. :-)

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:It's even factually correct. by cephyn · · Score: 4, Informative

      actually not true at all.

      check it out

      --
      Moo.
    2. Re:It's even factually correct. by Blakey+Rat · · Score: 3, Informative
      Something to tell the next kid you find singing "ring around the rosey," a nursery rhyme about the Plague. :-)


      Snopes. Snopes. Snopes, snopes, snopes, snopes, snopes.

      Who do you check before posting a dubious "fact?"

      SNOPES!
  13. Yersinia pestis is a contender. by John+M+Ford · · Score: 2, Informative

    Oh, the things that are not known for certain... :)

    While there is some new-ish research that might indicate otherwise, my understanding is that the research and its findings are not being very well received.

    Still very interesting.

    -John

    --
    I may disagree with what you have to say, but I shall defend, to the death, your right to say it. jya.com/ap.htm
    1. Re:Yersinia pestis is a contender. by cephyn · · Score: 5, Informative

      not all deaths attributed to the Black Death were from yersinia pestis, no argument there. With people dying in droves, almost any death at that time was attributed to The Black Death.

      As for a hemorragic fever being responsible, it is of course possible but highly unlikely. It would have to be an extremely exotic fever as no known hemo fever can survive through the cold european winter.

      Europe also was coming out of a time of extreme famine just prior to the onset of the Black Death, so its likely that many individuals were chronically malnourished with weakened immune systems. So, it wouldn't take anything more exotic than a foreign plague bacillus to really wreak havoc.

      --
      Moo.
  14. Some major-leaguer's are missing by Bowling+Moses · · Score: 4, Funny

    I don't get their criteria for giving out the cards. Some major-league diseases are missing like tuberculosis and cholera, but they give some small-time (yeah yeah it's not small if you've got it) diseases their own card. Damnit, I want a 1918 influenza card! It killed millions worldwide--a very pricey card I'm sure.

    1. Re:Some major-leaguer's are missing by slashjames · · Score: 2, Informative

      I agree. It originated from near where I am (Fort Riley, Kansas). Also has the dubius honor of contributing to the end of WWI from both sides having too many sick troops to mount a campaign.

  15. Clearly, designed for children by jtheory · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...by people who don't have a great understanding of children.

    I think this would have given me nightmares when I was a kid (check out page 2, with the thick white membrane in the throat of the Diptheria sufferer, or the backwards-bent leg of the Polio girl)... but I think the helpful translations of scientific words would have made up for it. This snippet (from the Cyclosporiasis blurb) is a fine example:
    You may get this disease from eating food or swallowing water that has been contaminated with feces (poop). About a week after you get this parasite, you may start to feel sick and have diarrhea.

    Yeah, I'm sure the kid knows what "contaminated" means... come on, guys. Though I will forgive them not trying to explain "diarrhea" using small words.
    --
    There are only 10 types of people: those who understand decimal, those who don't, and, uh, 8 other types I forget.
  16. Re:huh? by zaroastra · · Score: 2, Insightful
    fast google search will render you:
    this, and this

    The true nature of the "Black Death" was long a mystery, but early in the 20th Century, after doctors had found and described bubonic plague in India, experts jumped to the conclusion that a more virulent form of that disease, endemic in rats and transmitted to humans by their fleas, was the real culprit.
    This was a comforting conclusion, because it meant it was a bacterial disease with a complicated life cycle, easily contained by hygiene and antibiotics. But it never actually made sense, because the standard treatment for the Black Death, tried and tested over three hundred years, was to quarantine affected families and villages for forty days. That could not have worked if it were carried by rats, which do not respect quarantines. So two years ago Professors Christopher Duncan and Susan Scott of Liverpool University suggested in their book, Biology of Plagues, that the Black Death was really an Ebola like virus, a haemorrhagic fever transmitted directly from person to person.
    --
    I'm trying to get modded "Interesting Flamebait Informative and Insightful Redundant Troll" *-* Please Help *-*
  17. Don't Stop There! by Madcapjack · · Score: 2, Funny
    Wait until they come out with the action figures.

  18. Fascinations by mhollis · · Score: 3, Informative

    Children quickly become fascinated with things that are a part (and sometimes a horrible part) of their lives. One could say that the purpose for children is to go forth and gather diseases from schools so that they might infect their parents. And so do adults, as in the case of the Black Death and the pandemics of bubonic plague that swept Europe.

    A prime case of this type of fascination is in the art of the time, such as that of Hieronymus Bosch and others who began drawing images of intense suffering and disease.

    The death caused by these pandemics may also be seen as beneficent, as it gave rise to increased rights for the peasantry, the creation of a "middle class" and the concept of general human rights, which lead to the end of the feudal system of governments. The nobility could no longer compel peasants to work their land just for their protection and the peasantry demanded actual pay for work.

    This also gave rise to the general usage of sirnames that stuck throughout generations, as the kings would tax their noblemen on the basis of the potential in numbers of persons on their lands, instead of only on the size of their holdings. When the kings revenue collectors were faced with seventeen "Johns" they would assign names to them on basis of their employment, where they lived, or how they looked instead of who their father or master was.

    One can usually find the etymology of one's sirname in the common tongue of this period.

    --
    Gods don't kill people, people with gods kill people.
  19. and a Fun Game! by Petrol · · Score: 2, Informative

    I found this game (Black Death) some years ago. If I recall correctly it started out as a simulation of how disease spreads. It was turned into a game and every once in a while I whip it out to horrify my more 'sensible' friends. Great fun, well worth the $10 I spent a decade ago.

    --
    ...and that's the end of our show. Donk!
  20. Re:Infectious Disease? by Wirr · · Score: 3, Informative
    Since when is an ulcer an infectious disease?

    Since the discovery of Helicobacter pylori, which indeed causes ulcers.

    The link I gave doesn't say so, but as far as I know it is strongly suspected that it is indeed contagiuous.

  21. That snopes article sucks. by CoolGuySteve · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Usually Snopes articles are really good but that one's pretty weak.

    Up until the end where a folklorist is quoted, it's extremely speculative, basing almost all its evidence on the fact that the rhyme didn't appear in print until the 1880s. Arguing over the year claimed by an urban legend (or at least the version that they chose to knock down) is pretty pedantic and poorly thought out in this case.

    For example, it's much easier to make light of a plague that happened 2 centuries earlier, just as many of the posters here have done. It's also quite possible that nobody had written the rhyme down before 1881 despite its existance, contrary to snopes' arbitrary claims.

    The Grimm brothers didn't publish their collection until the early 1800s even though many of the tales had existed long before that. The Hunt translation (the most popular english translation around that era) didn't come until the mid to late 19th century. It seems folk tales and nursery rhymes were in vogue at the time.

    The red herring is that snopes exagerates the time span by referring to the 14th century plague rather than the more recent 17th century one. It would take a lot of drama out of their argument if they couldn't write about "five centuries" and "six centuries".

    They also dismiss the issue based on a lot of superficial differences. For example:

    The word "ashes" cannot be "a corruption of the sneezing sounds made by the infected person" and a word used for its literal meaning. Either "ashes" was a corruption of an earlier form or a deliberate use; it can't be both.


    Fuck off. Why not? The verse "Catch a tiger by the toe" has a disturbingly more racist variation. The use of the word "tiger" is both a linguistic corruption of an earlier form and a deliberate use.

    Moreover, the "ashes" ending of "Ring Around the Rosie" appears to be a fairly modern addition to the rhyme; earlier versions repeat other words or syllables instead (e.g., "Hush!", "A-tischa!", "Hasher", "Husher", "Hatch-u", "A-tishoo") or, as noted above, have completely different endings.


    Wow, a few of those sound a lot like sneezing to me. Snopes is also ignoring the regional differences that this probably comes from. I drink pop and use kleenex while others drink soda and use tissues. Before TV and radio, these differences were more prevalent and evolved over time. And for the love of Pete, it's not like we ever obscure morbid concepts in language. That practice passed away a while back.

    As for the folklorist, he explains the ring game and how the rhyme fits. That's not enough to claim the rhyme has no other meaning, he just describes its purpose.

    The article doesn't present any concrete evidence to show why the plague interpretation is not a valid one, just that the verses are more recent than the 1300s. Considering the line "The nursery rhyme 'Ring Around the Rosie' is a coded reference to the Black Plague." is marked with a big red "False", they sure do a shitty job of addressing the issue.

    IMO, treating this snopes article as a solid fact is worse than doing so with the original presumption. It's annoying that they can get away with making such loose arguments just because they wear the magic skeptic hat.