Slashdot Mirror


Nextel and FCC Swap Bandwidth

evilninja writes "Techweb is reporting on the sale of 10MHz worth of bandwidth to Nextel by the FCC. One term of the agreement will solve a problem that has been frustrating the FCC for some time. Nextel will return some of their bandwidth to the public domain, since it has been interfering with local emergency channels in some areas."

33 of 124 comments (clear)

  1. the fcc by Fuzzy_Nuts · · Score: 4, Interesting

    So the FCC couldn't just force Nextel to stop useing the bandwidth that was used for emergeny channels?

    --
    ReachInternet.com Wireless, Campus Area Networks, Office Networking.
    1. Re:the fcc by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nextel did not use emergency channels, they were using cellphone channels. Emergency frequencies happens to be next beside cellphone frequencies. Guess what happens when you cram a ludicrous amount of soccer moms screeming sensless in their phone while driving? That's right, it overlaps in neighboors frequencies.

    2. Re:the fcc by silas_moeckel · · Score: 3, Informative

      More importantly they were using the channels that the FCC gave them to use for cell phones right ext to emergency channels.

      --
      No sir I dont like it.
    3. Re:the fcc by Suppafly · · Score: 2, Informative

      except if your house blocks the highway, they pay you fair market value for it.. its the same thing here.

  2. This story is so boring... by Neil+Blender · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...it hertz.

    1. Re:This story is so boring... by cytoman · · Score: 2, Funny

      you mean... *mega* hertz :-D

  3. Hopefully... by Count+of+Montecristo · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Although the article does not mention a lot of detail, I do hope that this will fix some of the reception problems i've been having in the LA Metropolitan area with Nextel.

    It used to be pretty reliable almost anywhere, although lately there were some 'lossy' spots to say the least.

    On the other hand, since i'm no iDEN expert.. will this require an upgrade to the handset's codeplug?

    --
    *shower*
    1. Re:Hopefully... by Tmack · · Score: 2, Informative
      Most of the field techs I work with have nextel phones. The reception sucks for all of them in the 4 market areas across the US I work in. Texas, Georigia, Denver, they all have crappy reception. Trying to call a tech thats got a Nextel normally requires 2 calls, the first either goes into their voicemail or gives some Nextel error message, the second usually goes through if they have a signal. And when porting (LNP) phone numbers for our customers (I work for a CLEC), the techs cant test the porting with their cellphones normally, because Nextel is one of the slowest carriers to update their translations, thus the test calls from their phones usually route to the old provider's phone block rather than the one we installed and just ported the numbers to.

      Tm

      --
      Support TBI Research: http://www.raisinhope.org
  4. This is what the FCC is for by afidel · · Score: 4, Insightful

    The spectrum is a public trust and if the FCC can eliminate the interference without killing off the company that they issued the origional spectrum to they should. Verizon is stupid for demanding that the spectrum be auctioned to the highest bidder because Nextel and the FCC are doing what is in the publics best interest.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    1. Re:This is what the FCC is for by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Then again, Verizon got most of its cell-phone bandwidth simply for being the Baby Bell company of record... not at an auction.

      It's hard to claim the "free lunch" argument when you're munching on one as well...

    2. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Detritus · · Score: 2, Informative
      Except that in most cases it isn't Nextel's fault. There are many public safety radio systems that are not designed to reliably operate in a hostile RF environment. More transmitter sites and higher quality radio equipment costs money. Doing it on the cheap saves money at the cost of coverage and reliability.

      The general rule is that if the interfering transmitter is operating within FCC rules and sound technical practices, it isn't responsible for solving interference problems that are the result of deficiencies in the equipment that is suffering the interference.

      --
      Mea navis aericumbens anguillis abundat
    3. Re:This is what the FCC is for by Bruha · · Score: 2, Informative

      Verizon is a landline company.. Verizon Wireless is a cellular company and bought all their bandwidth. They are entirely seperate companies with Vodaphone PLC owning the majority of the company not Verizon.

      Either way verizon wireless arguement is valid. Just giving Nextel a 10mhz peice of spectrum for free is a slap in the face to all the other companies that have paid billions for their specturm. Nextel cannot tell me they were not aware that there could be problems with them moving in on the 800mhz area or they dont know what a spectrum engineer is for.

    4. Re:This is what the FCC is for by LostCluster · · Score: 2, Informative

      That's a true statement about the state of Verizon Wireless today, but neglects the history of where the bulk of their bandwidth licenses come from...

      Verizon Wireless has heritage in the fact that FCC handed out the original cellular licenses in pairs in each area.. one went to the Baby Bell company of the area, and another went to a competor company. (Celluar being an unproven business at the time, the competitor slot went to the first company to stand up and be willing to invest in the technology... and there was sometimes a wait to find that newcomer.) As a result, Bell Atlantic, NYNEX and GTE (the Baby Bells who'd eventually merge into Verizon) all got into the wireless business that way. Those licenses are now in the hands of Verizon...

      As a result, much of Verizon's bandwidth wasn't won at auction either.

  5. Re:Beep Beep! by Izago909 · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm sure that walkie feature is nice for some conditions, but I swear I'm going to slap the next person in the elevator who feels like using it to gossip about who slept with whom.

  6. Bah by Billobob · · Score: 4, Funny

    Who needs emergency cha- wait, where the hell did that tornado come from...

    --
    If you have to ask, you'll never know.
  7. Public Domain? by hugesmile · · Score: 4, Informative
    Nextel will return some of their bandwidth to the public domain

    I don't think this part of the spectrum is in the "public domain" as if anyone can use it. More accurately, it's been returned to the highly regulated, unaassigned pool of the spectrum.

  8. Effects on service, etc. by Harpua22 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder if this will have much effect on Nextel's service? Previous to this, Nextel had some of the best coverage around. I am obviously no expert (as someone here is bound to point out) but is it possible that a change in the spectrum Nextel will be using will result in a change in their service? Then we have the whining. It sounds to me like some rivals (verizon) are fuming because they see their company's fortunes as being more important than the greater good of society (i.e. the ability to use emergency channels without interference) Won't Nextel incur significant costs to facilitate this switch anyway, partially offsetting what other companies see as a "giveaway"?

    1. Re:Effects on service, etc. by b1scuit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Won't Nextel incur significant costs to facilitate this switch anyway, partially offsetting what other companies see as a "giveaway"? Yes, actually. The FCC is making Nextel acquire a 2.5 Billion Dollar letter of credit, to facilitate switching all the existing sytems. $2.5B liquid dollars isn't anything to laugh about. Also, per RCRNews.com: "If the relocation costs, including Nextel's own costs plus the value of the spectrum it relinquishes, is less than $4.8 billion, Nextel will pay an anti-windfall payment to the U.S. Treasury." Basically, it's going to cost Nextel close to 5 Billion dollars to do this whole thing, one way or another. And the kicker is that they just had to shell out to do this very thing not a year ago, when they started moving people around in the 800MHZ band. We had to retune about 22 repeaters(at Nextel's expense, but it was still a pain). I have no sympathy for Nextel in this matter. They still interfere with some of our channels and it's a bitch to track down. That whole system has been nothing but a pain in our ass. 2 out of 3 of the interference problems we have are usually nextel related, and those phones make damn near everything in my office flicker or go tick tick tick tick... I'm done, I promise. :)

  9. What about customers? by bstone · · Score: 4, Insightful

    What happens to Nextel customers with phones that operate on the frequencies that they just sold back to the feds? Do the customers now "get to" buy a new phone from Nextel (with a new two year service contract, I assume)? If so, it sounds like a windfall for Nextel.

  10. Questions from the Article by Lifix · · Score: 4, Informative

    The issue here is simple: if the current allocation of frequencies is cutting into emergency services, then that needs to be fixed.

    The FCC was debating letting Nextel reorganize the 800MHz band in return for their slice. This no doubt pissed off all their competitors who had to pay millions for their GHz freqs.

    Usefull links:
    Slashdot: FCC to Reorganize 800 band.
    FCC Options and Alternatives for 800 band

    --
    In nature, there are neither rewards or punishments, there are only consequences.
  11. I see a problem with the FCC "selling" RF spectrum by Polarism · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It doesn't make much sense to me, if they are supposed to be regulating the RF spectrum, then why are they allowed to sell any of it? That's about the worst thing for the "public" you can let them do.

    If what this article is saying (it does not specifically say anything directly related to a "sale", but pretty much draws the inference on. That would mean Nextel now "owns" that part of the spectrum from the FCC?

    Just sounds fishy, hope i'm interpreting that incorrectly.

    --
    All your base are belong to Google.
  12. Nextel gets a steal by fishbert42 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    So, Nextel a mere $1.6 billion for bandwidth rights which should've cost somewhere between $3 billion or $5 billion.
    "Oh, the poor emergency responders! Of course we'll trade bandwidth with you... it's for the good of the nation."
    Give me a break!

    Verizon must be pissed.

    1. Re:Nextel gets a steal by Durrik · · Score: 3, Informative

      Verizon is probably just pissed because they don't like competition. As for the 1.6 vs 3 billion, I'm not sure its that big of a steal. The 800 MHz mobile band is much more valuable then the 1.8 GHz PCS band, from the providors point of view.

      One of the rules of RF cost/design is that as frequency goes up the electronics to increase the power and quality of the signal goes up, while the cost/size of the antennia goes down. The problem is, that the cost goes up faster for the electronics then the cost goes down for the antennia.

      So they gave up an 800 MHz block that would probably be worth at least 1.5 to 3 billion to them, and bought another block. The money almost works out the same. What would have really sucked for Nextel and probably what Verizon wanted was for them to give up the 800 MHz block. And then lose the auction for the new block, cutting Nextel out of the market and reducing competition.

      Also the higher the frequency the worse it is for distance. I can't remember the exact figures but I think for PCS you need 3 - 4 times the number of base stations as you need for the 800 MHz band.

      As for upgrading the customer's phones, it won't be much if they already support the new band as many newer phones do. If they don't the customers are going to have to get new phones. In BC when Telus upgraded their PCS base stations to 3G the old 2G phones wouldn't work. They gave out their cheep phones to the old customers and didn't make them get a new contract. Nextel can do the same thing.

      For the phones that already support the new frequency. The new frequency plan can be downloaded over the air during off hours, or even when the customer is talking on the phone.

      --
      Software Engineer & Writer of Military Science Fiction and Fantasy Blog: petermwright.com Twitter: WrightPeterM
    2. Re:Nextel gets a steal by b1scuit · · Score: 2, Insightful
      Nextel isn't really getting that great a deal. But it's not a bad deal, either.

      They're spending close to $5B in spectrum and cash for a solid 10MHz block in the 1.9GHz band. The spectrum that they're trading in (non-contiguous chunks in the 600-700MHz bands) is woth about 1.6Billion, sure. But the cost of retuning all those other license holders is gonna run close to $3.2B. And if Nextel doesn't spend that much while doing this switch, then they have to pay the diff. to the treasury in an anti-windfall payment.

      Did Nextel (and the FCC) way undervalue a solid 10MHz block in the 1.9GHz band? Yes. But Nextel isn't walking away with this spectrum, either. It's gonna cost them $4.8B to do this, any way you look at it. That's not chump change.

  13. Well you see by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 4, Insightful

    That would be against the Constitution, you know, that pesky little document that is the supreme law of the land. In Ammendment 5 it declares "nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." This is why you are paid if a city emmenent domains your house to build a highway. They'd much rather just force you out and not have to pay. That would be better for the public good, since it wouldn't require using taxpayer dollars to pay for your house. Rather unfair to you, hence why Ammendment 5 is in there.

    Well, same basic protections apply to corperations. When they buy something, be it land, or slices of RF, they expect that it then belongs to them. Now they can face emmenent domain too, but just like individuals, they need to be compensated. If you get down to it, it's just basic kindergarden level concepts of fairness. You don't take something from someone without giving them something in return.

    And trust me, you don't want a government that can just take shit for "the public good" because that WILL get abused.

  14. Nextel Plans by SolidCore · · Score: 4, Informative

    Federal regulators said that they would vote next week on a proposal aimed at resolving problems with cellphone interference in police and fire communications systems. According to an agenda released, the FCC vote will come at the agency's monthly meeting. Nextel Communications is largely blamed for causing the interference. Radios used by police, firefighters and other first responders broadcast on the same 800 Mhz spectrum as Nextel phones. So, if a radio dispatch is made at 850 Mhz near a cell tower broadcasting at 851 Mhz, the radio signal can be drowned out. The commission is expected to approve a Nextel backed plan in which the company would abandon some of its airwaves in exchange for more lucrative spectrum in a band that won't disrupt the radio communications of emergency officials. Nextel would be relocated to more valuable spectrum in the 1.9 Ghz frequency range, where most other cellular companies operate. Nextel's competitors, Verizon and Cingular Wireless, have staunchly opposed the move.

  15. Uh oh... by stienman · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nextel and FCC Swap Bandwidth

    FCC has reportedly denied having mono, and sources claim that HIV test results should be available soon.

    -Adam

  16. Somewhere in Denver... by Talisman · · Score: 3, Funny

    Dispatcher: "Unit 9, we've got a head-on collision on I-70. Multiple casualties. Can you respond?"

    Unit 9: "Roger that, dispa...zzzzzfffzzzkkkkkrkrkk...so I'm all like WHATEVER! he wasn't even cute enoug... Dispatch? Did you copy?"

    Dispatcher: "Unit 9, negative. There appears to be interfe... and then he CALLED me and asked me out aga OH hold on, got another call *click* Hello? Hey babe! Yes, I watched American Idol last night. Can you BELIVE that bitch won?!?"

    Unit 9: "Dispatch come back. Got chatter on the frequency."

    Dispatcher: "Roger that, Unit 9. Hold on a sec. (alters voice) This is Nextel customer service. Sorry to interrupt your call, but we are investigating cloned numbers and we think you may be a victim. Can you please verify your billing address for us?"

    Female teen voice: "OMIGOD where did that come from hahahaha! OMIGOD OK it's 5233 South Downing Lane."

    Dispatcher: "That will be fine, ma'am. We'll be with you shortly. Unit 9, standby. SWAT, we've got what looks like a drug deal gone bad at 5233 South Downing Lane. Advise that you have permission to use deadly force and should go in locked, cocked and ready to rock."

    SWAT: "Roger that, dispatch." (sounds of guns loading)

    Dispatcher: "Unit 9, we've got a head-on collision on I-70. Multiple casualties. Can you respond?"

    --

    "Study your math, kids. Key to the universe." -The Archangel Gabriel
  17. Re:Dumb Question by squiggleslash · · Score: 2, Informative

    No, it just means the Nextel cell phones will have to be replaced with ones that work on the new frequency. Unless Motorola has been very forward thinking...

    --
    You are not alone. This is not normal. None of this is normal.
  18. FCC to blame by Fujisawa+Sensei · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I believe that in this case the FCC is entirely to blame. Isn't it their chartered duty to make sure that crap like this doesn't happen.

    --
    If someone is passing you on the right, you are an asshole for driving in the wrong lane.
  19. Nextel, We Make a Lot of Money Change Hands by usurper_ii · · Score: 2, Informative

    Funny thing about the whole deal. I work for a 2-way radio company that has a table in a back room full of 800 Mhz radios. The radios came from companies that were using them. When Nextel purchased the 800 Mhz spectrum, we (back before I started) had to sell all of these companies new radios in a different spectrum. Well, Nextel has yet to build out in my area and it has been several years since all of this took place.

    I overheard some of our current customers complaining that they thought the whole deal was phony and created to sell them new radios. And I could see where they are coming from since Nextel didn't build out and it has been years, it does make us look a little bad (each one of the radios on that back table is hundreds of dollars, so this was a *huge* amount of money spread across a lot of companies).

    It would be almost a kind of irony if Nextel's customers had to buy new phones. First it makes companies have to spend a lot of money, then it turns around and makes consumers spend a lot of money.

    Maybe Nextel's catch phrase should be: Nextel, we make a lot of money change hands.

    (And if anyone was wondering, the 800 Mhz radios can be used for non-profit emergency-type stuff (VFD, first responders, sheriff, etc.), so my company has just started building out an 800 Mhz system and has started installing all of the radios and is eating all of the installation cost!)

    Usurper_ii

  20. Push-to-talk bandwidth by saikou · · Score: 2, Insightful

    So in worst case scenario Nextel PTT service would be hit. More grief to local construction crews, some joy for people eating out at local chinese buffet [Prr-BEEP] JOHN GET YOUR $%^$ HERE, MIKE JUST SCREWED UP THE LINING ON THE SECOND FLOOR.
    But seriously -- this plan is quite old.
    See this article (Motorola drops 800 MHz bomb)

  21. Re:Honest question: by hugesmile · · Score: 2, Funny
    I have a Nextel... the main attraction to the walkie-talkie feature is that I don't need to dial (or as a recipient, I don't need to answer).

    We rapidly established a protocol at the office where I work, in that you don't start talking without doing a silent Alert first. So if I want to walkie-talkie someone, I Alert them, they answer (if they are in a position to), and then we talk.

    This avoids the random voice blurting out in a meeting, except for MORONS who randomly Direct Connect the WRONG NUMBER (who ARE These morons??)

    Since their Direct Connect Number appears on my phone, I have added them to my phone directory (Moron1, Moron2, etc), so I can see if there are repeat offenders. When I am ready to turn in my phone for good, I am going to spend the prior week calling all these MORONS back in the middle of the night, and blurt out idiotic stuff like they did. Especially Moron3 - He has made the same mistake about 10 times!