Slashdot Mirror


Star Trek XI: Romulan Wars?

Tycoon Guy writes "TrekToday reports that the next Star Trek movie will deal with the war between Earth and the Romulans that led to the founding of the Federation. According to Rick Berman, the film will be 'set before the time of Kirk, but will not be connected with Enterprise.' So how will they make this fit with the Classic Trek episode Balance of Terror, in which we learned that no human ever saw the face of a Romulan during the Romulan Wars?"

19 of 753 comments (clear)

  1. Uh.... by raehl · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe the Romulans wear Vulcan disguises?

    1. Re:Uh.... by freqres · · Score: 5, Funny

      That sounds supisciously like Sci-Fi pr0n to me.

      --
      Rampant Ninja related crimes these days...Whitehouse is not the exception
    2. Re:Uh.... by PierceLabs · · Score: 4, Funny

      Nah, it is clear that all Romulan warships of the time used weapons that emitted BLINDEON particles.

  2. Many options for resolving the conflict by gbulmash · · Score: 4, Funny
    So how will they make this fit with the Classic Trek episode Balance of Terror, in which we learned that no human ever saw the face of a Romulan during the Romulan Wars?

    1: Facial cloaking devices that bend light around the head
    2: Bandannas ("this here's a stick-up, human")
    3: Big helmets!
    4: The hero slingshots around the sun, goes back in time, and unveils Romulan faces, negating the old episode. Yes, it's a time paradox, but if "First Contact" could get away with telling Zeffrem Cochran about his future...
    5: Ignore old Trek on the assumption that only the geekiest fans would remember that episode and the rest wouldn't care.

    - Greg

  3. West Wing episode 4.10 "Arctic Radar" by spoonyfork · · Score: 5, Funny
    West Wing episode 4.10 "Arctic Radar"

    JANICE
    I'm not obsessed, you know.

    JOSH
    I'm sorry?

    JANICE
    I'm not obsessed. I'm just a fan, and I care.

    JOSH
    What's your name again?

    JANICE
    Janice.

    JOSH
    I'm a fan. I'm a sports fan, I'm a music fan and I'm a Star Trek fan. All of them. But here's what I don't do. Tell me if any of this sounds familiar: "Let's list our ten favorite episodes. Let's list our least favorite episodes. Let's list our favorite galaxies. Let's make a chart to see how often our favorite galaxies appear in our favorite episodes. What Romulan would you most like to see coupled with a Cardassian and why? Let's spend a weekend talking about Romulans falling in love with Cardassians and then let's do it again." That's not being a fan. That's having a fetish. And I don't have a problem with that, except you can't bring your hobbies in to work, okay?

    JANICE
    Got it.
    --
    Speak truth to power.
    1. Re:West Wing episode 4.10 "Arctic Radar" by KingAdrock · · Score: 4, Funny


      JOSH
      Except on Star Trek holidays.
    2. Re:West Wing episode 4.10 "Arctic Radar" by julesh · · Score: 4, Funny

      Now that's irony. A West Wing geek quoting West Wing making fun of Star Trek geeks. So, what are your favourite 10 West Wing episodes? ;)

  4. Re:Kill all the crew... by blowdart · · Score: 5, Funny
    Simple.

    Berman : "How do I fix this"

    Braga : "Particle of the week"

  5. The Simpsons' answer by gspr · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Ah yeah well, whenever you notice something like that, a wizard did it."
    -"But in episode AG4..."
    "WIZARD!"

  6. Re:Kill all the crew... by B3ryllium · · Score: 4, Funny

    omg, not INTERFEREONS! And interfereometric waves!

  7. Re:They killed off Data!? by CommanderData · · Score: 4, Funny

    Reports of my death have been greatly exaggerated...

    --
    Urge to post... fading... fading... RISING!... fading... fading... gone.
  8. Improving Star Trek, the idiot's guide: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Shoot Rick Berman in the face with a nuke cannon.
    2. Bring back Gates McFadden. Irish people rock.
    3. Bring back Patrick Stewart. Bald english people rock.
    4. Bring back Jeri Ryan. Walking plot-elements rock, occasionally.
    5. Bring back Leonard Nimoy. It's only logical.
    6. Bring back whoever the hell played Kira in DS9. We need aggresive people who dont mind kicking ass.
    7. Bring back whoever played Worf. Same thing as Kira.
    8. Elimate time travel. Blame Q. Then elimate Q as well, blame time travel.
    9. Make the Borg kick ass again.
    10. More action. If I wanted advice on parenting, decisions, whatever, I'd visit my mother. Stop talking and kill those idiots.
    11. Bring Garibaldi and Marcus Cole from B5 into the series. They are awesome. Ivanova would be nice too, but she and Kira would likely kill eachother within five minutes.
    12. Leave the script to Mel Brooks.
  9. Re:Romulan faces by PortHaven · · Score: 5, Funny

    Some clarification on the historical documents you refer to:

    a) there has been discovered a historical error of 4 yrs in the records, WWIII in fact began on 2001

    b) over the years the dialect changes of BASIC has caused some confusion. Recent discoveries have also shed light that the war did not start "after Khan" but rather in "Afghanistan"

    Just as our historical documents (textbooks, films, etc) are full of errors so are the ones of the 23rd and 24th centuries...

  10. Re:*NERD ALERT* by reverius · · Score: 5, Funny

    You're on Slashdot. The Nerd Alert is unnecessary.

    Did you think this was "News for Normal People, Stuff that Isn't Geeky"?

  11. Let Pixar do it by Gzip+Christ · · Score: 4, Funny
    XI - that would make it another odd numbered star trek movie. I hold no hope for it....
    What they should do is just stick with X. I propose the following naming scheme for the next few Star Trek sequels:
    • Star Trek X: Leopard
    • Star Trek X: Puma
    • Star Trek X: Jaguar
    • Star Trek X: Panther
    • Star Trek X: Tiger
    The trick is to not vary the modulus of the version number but to vary the fur color instead.
  12. Re: Who cares about "classic" trek? by Dr.+GeneMachine · · Score: 5, Funny
    >>I don't particularly like the original Star Trek
    >Let me guess....you use emacs, right?

    And there, at first unnoticed in a somewhat offtopic thread on /., it happened. The combination of two flamebaits, the Star-Trek-TOS-vs.-later-series and vi-vs.-emacs debates. Little did the original posters know about what they unleashed, a critical flame-mass triggering the worlds first thermonuclear flamewar. Centuries did it take for historians to recover the way of events from mostly degraded hard disks. Up to now it is heavily debated in the scientific community, whether "frist ps0t!" had anything to do with this, and what kind of deities the mighty "vi" and the world-shattering "emacs" represented...

    --
    This comment does not exist.
  13. This being Star Trek... by ScottGant · · Score: 4, Funny

    They use boilerplate story programs:

    "The Crew of the _______(insert catchy ship name here) finds out that the _________(1.transporter 2.holodeck 3.matter-antimatter thingy 4.dylithim crystals) has/have gone haywire and they only have 5 seconds to respond or be destroyed.

    During the crisis, they find the only way to save themselves is to _______(1. go back in time 2. somehow create a time-warp to go back in time 3. Accidentally go back in time 4. Have Q come to the rescue and send them back in time.)

    There is a middle part of the story that we'll just make up as we go until then end where right at the last moment, when things seem that the ship is in certain doom and with the added pressure of the entire known universe in jepardy, they simply reverse the _________(put techno speak thingy there) with the ________(place another techno speak thingy here) and in theory it should put everything right, but only after the huge time counter on the bridge counts down to 1 second left.

    Last line of course is _______(put in old literary sea-faring reference here)."

    --

    "Music is everybody's possession. It's only publishers who think that people own it." - John Lennon.
  14. Re:Kill all the crew... by zakezuke · · Score: 4, Funny

    I'm overreacting a bit. Every time there's a Slashdot story about Enterprise, somebody get's modded up to +5 for complaining about continuity. I get frustrated when I think about how somebody can have Trek's vaguely defined timeline from the original series memorized to the minutist detail, but they don't remember the events of one of Star Trek's most popular movies.

    The movies are easier to remember (ok I had to check the startrek.com site to remember them all)

    1. The search for v'ger (aka a plot)
    2. The Search for K'han
    3. The Search for Spock
    4. The Search for Whales
    5. The Search for God
    6. The Search for Shakesphere
    7. The Search for William Shatner
    8. The Search for Vulcans
    9. The Search for Little Picard

    And the rule of thumb, even numbered trek films don't suck (as much).

    --
    There is no sanctuary. There is no sanctuary. SHUT UP! There is no shut up. There is no shut up.
  15. Re:Kill all the crew... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 4, Funny

    They don't even notice when they get beaten over the head with the whole temporal cold war concept that was established in episode 1

    Personally I disliked Jar Jar being in the star trek timeline.