Slashdot Mirror


Mexican Attorney General Gets Microchip in Arm

novakreo writes "Rafael Macedo de la Concha, Mexico's Attorney-General, now has a non-removable microchip in his arm, to track his movements and to give him access to a new crime database, according to Bloomberg. The article says that eventually around 160 Mexican officials will have a chip implanted." (Wired and CNN are both running the very similar Reuters report, too.)

78 of 410 comments (clear)

  1. Great... by EvilTwinSkippy · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, when someone REALLY wants access to the system, all they'll need is a saw.

    --
    "Learning is not compulsory... neither is survival."
    --Dr.W.Edwards Deming
    1. Re:Great... by peragrin · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most Saws don't work well on humans and would cause scars. You need a fine tooth long blade in a Sawzall, in order to quickly producea clean wound.

      Oh wait did yo want him to live afterwards???

      In that case never mind. An axe will work just as well.

      --
      i thought once I was found, but it was only a dream.
    2. Re:Great... by Scorchio · · Score: 3, Funny

      Don't worry. They've gone to great lengths to let the whole world know it's implanted in his arm, when actually it's in his left leg.

    3. Re:Great... by tehcyder · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I don't think any gang with the nerve to kidnap the Attorney General would worry too much about gouging his arm a little.

      --
      To have a right to do a thing is not at all the same as to be right in doing it
    4. Re:Great... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      what i want to know is these mexicans that are getting micro chips, will they be receiving some micro salsa to go with that?

      bada boom crash!

    5. Re:Great... by StuckInSyrup · · Score: 2, Funny

      There must be some security issue, in case his arm is severed. I think the acces to the chip is granted when he licks his own elbow.

      --
      Ni.
    6. Re:Great... by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      That's not his leg.

      *NOW* how's his security?

      --

      I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

    7. Re:Great... by ThatsNotFunny · · Score: 2, Funny

      I likes to use a Sling Blade. Some people call it a Kaiser Blade, but I likes to call it a Sling Blade. Mmm Hmm. You got any of them French Fried Pertaters? Mmm Hmm.

      --
      "Was it a millionaire who said 'Imagine No Posessions?'" -- Elvis Costello
    8. Re:Great... by SEWilco · · Score: 2, Interesting
      being able to track him no matter where he went

      Does someone think that this chip can be read from further than two meters away?

  2. Yeah well... by nametaken · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...EVERYTHING is removeable. The question is what happens when you do.

  3. How to cause panic (evil and slightly offtopic) by CdBee · · Score: 4, Funny

    Record his transponder signal, and throw a copy of his chip over the border fence into the USA...

    --
    I have been a user for about 10 years. This ends Feb 2014. The site's been ruined. I'm off. Dice, FU
  4. His is a beautiful mind? by YetAnotherName · · Score: 2, Interesting
  5. Thoughts... by mirko · · Score: 2, Interesting
    1. If he gets kidnapped, I guess I know what will be sent as a proof of his detention... I just hope he didn't have it implanted in his writing (and pizza^Wtortilla-eating) arm.
    2. Is this the same chip that the Okinawese scholards are supposed to get ?
    --
    Trolling using another account since 2005.
  6. Not necessarily by brunes69 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The technology exists such that they could in theory make this thing only operate when pysically attached to the body ( say, powered off of blood or bloodflow ), and only operate when in contact with his specific blood type.

    So to use it, a perpetraitor would have to a) Kidnap him, b ) cut off his arm, c) surgically graft the thing into someone else with the same blood type.

    Hopefully by that point they'd have de-activated his chip.

    I imagine in a few years we'd even be able to make these things DNA specific.

    1. Re:Not necessarily by uberdood · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Even if it was tied to his DNA for operation, I still don't see how the chip is non-removable. If it can be inserted INTO the body, it can be removed.

      --
      "Population 1,656"
  7. Can't be removed? by jerith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "can't be removed" -- I doubt that. *Anything* can be removed from the human body if the remover the required skill and doesn't really care about collateral damage.

    I suddenly have a mental image of a Mexican criminal trying to get into a government installation carrying an arm...

    1. Re:Can't be removed? by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

      I suddenly have a mental image of a Mexican criminal trying to get into a government installation carrying an arm...

      If he doesn't get in there, he can just go to a convenience store to commit an "armed" robbery.

      --
      Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
    2. Re:Can't be removed? by kyknos.org · · Score: 4, Funny

      "In the case of Mexico, where the vast majority of its citizens have sub-average intelligence" you are an American and Bush voter, aren't you?

      --

      SHE does throw dice.
    3. Re:Can't be removed? by Bob+Cat+-+NYMPHS · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, he is a racist or an idiot. After that, it doesn't matter what he is or who he votes for.

      You, on the other hand, smear both Americans and Bush voters as being like this racist idiot guy. Pot Kettle Black.

    4. Re:Can't be removed? by philbert26 · · Score: 2, Insightful
      "In the case of Mexico, where the vast majority of its citizens have sub-average intelligence" you are an American and Bush voter, aren't you?

      Yes, I'm sure that someone with a phobia of Mexicans will vote for Bush. The right wing are really happy with his policies on immigration.

    5. Re:Can't be removed? by Colonel+Cholling · · Score: 4, Funny

      You, on the other hand, smear both Americans and Bush voters as being like this racist idiot guy. Pot Kettle Black.

      *ahem* That's "Pot Kettle African-American," you insensitive clod.

      --

      I am Sartre of the Borg. Existence is futile.
  8. Welcome to the Future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Why is it sci-fi movies of years past tend to predict the future

    terminator/2, cafe flesh etc etc :)

    Anyways im still waiting for the flying cars..

  9. Mark of the devil!!! by mystereys · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm just waiting for the conspiracy theorists on this one:

    It's the sign on the devil! Apocalypse is upon us! Major League Baseball really is tracking our movements!

    --
    "Righteous speed demon and trust fund party darling of justice"
  10. tracking? by AmigaAvenger · · Score: 3, Interesting

    anyone else doubt the tracking ability of this thing? it would need both a fairly decent rx/antenna, and also a fairly good transmitter to get that info back out. since mexico isn't known for the incredible cell coverage, the incoming part would at least have to be gps. outgoing could be cell, but would be better served by satellite also. So they fit two satellite radio devices into this guy, complete with high gain antennas?

    1. Re:tracking? by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Well, the article says as he goes about the city. I imagine the chip readers are installed at the doors to various governmental buildings. Between that and tracking his official car, they can follow his whereabouts pretty effectively.

      As to range, I keep reading people saying it's only a very short distance, yet I have heard they have some good rfid now they can place on goods inside of steel locked containers and read them effectively outside the container. That's decent range and power, and I am sure they probably have much better ones that aren't common public knowledge yet. And yes, using the skin as the antenna and part of the transmitting power source would be effective, you would imagine.

  11. Re:I for one... by no+reason+to+be+here · · Score: 2, Informative

    Federali wouldn't be a word in Spanish. Maybe Italian or Latin, but not Spanish. I think the Spanish word would be Federales.

  12. Reboot? by FuzzyShrimp · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, do you kick hin in the ass to reboot the thing?

  13. A chip to "give him access" ? by Gothmolly · · Score: 4, Funny

    What, with an internal heads-up-display, a la the Terminator
    I am Attorney Sancho Panza of Borg, prepare to be indicted!

    --
    I want to delete my account but Slashdot doesn't allow it.
  14. Wow! Another "cyborg"! by djkitsch · · Score: 2, Informative

    It looks like he's giving Professor Kevin Warwick a run for his money...

    Next step: interfacing with computers using mind control!

    --
    sig:- (wit >= sarcasm)
  15. Microchip in arm by Avada+Kedavra · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Civilian contractors in Iraq need this technology
    not Mexican Attorney Generals.

  16. I can tell you one thing by adeyadey · · Score: 2, Funny

    This guy really does have a chip on his shoulder..

    (ok ok arm, its close..)

    Seriously though, is there really any justification for this? Is this not something that can be achieved by other, less obtrusive methods?

    --
    "You lied to me! There is a Swansea!"
  17. Upgrades by iCharles · · Score: 3, Informative
    I've always had a problem with implantable technologies for non-medical purposes (i.e. not pacemakers, replacement valves, etc.). Basically, you wind up with
    • Having to make all sorts of backward compatibility on a single standard.
    • Competing standards requiring multiple implants. (and you thought browser wars were bad!)
    • Surgery every few years to upgrade (would Best Buy take an old implant back?)
    • A lot of old chips collecting in your arm, leg, neck, etc.
  18. yes but.. by Mr.+Smokey+Mcpot · · Score: 5, Funny

    can you run linux on Him? Now that's what I call an Embedded solution.

    1. Re:yes but.. by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2, Funny

      Imagine a beowulf cluster of attorney generals!

      Sorry.

  19. not only useless but dangerous by koan · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How hard is it to block the signal? kidnap them throw them in a foil lined body bag then scan later in a basement to remove.
    I guess in one sense you could mail them the chip to prove you have the official.

    --
    "If any question why we died, Tell them because our fathers lied."
  20. El hermano mayor le está mirando. by pragma_x · · Score: 3, Funny

    En Rusia soviética, el microchip le programa!

  21. A fine assasination tool by mrmeval · · Score: 3, Insightful



    ``The system is already in place and I already have it,'' he said. ``It's only for access, for security and so that I can also be located at any moment anywhere I am.''

    If I have the key I can drop an NLOS on you ass baby!

    http://www.raytheon.com/products/nlos/

    --
    I'd go on a Vegan diet but the delivery time from Vega is too long. --brownkitty
  22. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Homeland security soons [sic] hopes, through coersion [sic], fear, FUD, false warnings and money, to install trackable microchips in every Mexican by the year 2020.

    I suppose you intended this a humor, but I fear you're right. I suspect Homeland Security -- or actually, the U.S. Treasury, may even be behind this.



    From the article: The chip can't be removed, but will be deactivated after Macedo's term as attorney general expires, he said.

    Now, did Mexico implant 160 government employees with non-removable chips at the behest of the Bush Administration?

    According to Fox News (emphasis orthogonal's):

    WASHINGTON -- The Bush administration announced Tuesday [6 July 2004] that it has resumed sharing a wide range of financial information with Mexico with the aim of trying to catch money launderers (search), drug dealers and terrorist financiers.

    In April, the United States had suspended sharing such information with Mexico, dealing a blow to cross-border crime fighting, which had resulted in the arrests of several high-profile drug lords.

    The U.S. government did so after sensitive information provided by the [U.S.] Treasury Department's Financial Crimes Enforcement Network was leaked by Mexican officials. After the suspension, the network outlined a set of steps that Mexico should take before the United States would agree to resume information-sharing.

    The Treasury Department said Tuesday that Mexico has since taken steps to safeguard sensitive financial information it receives from the United States and other countries.


    Were employees told to get the chip or to find another job? Especially bad is that the chip can be "deactivated" but not removed. Even deactivated, can it be detected? Conversely, if it can't be detected after detection because it has its, for instance, own power source which is turned off by deactivation -- unlike RFID chips which reflect the powered signal of a detector --, what do you do when the power runs out? Stick in yet another chip?

    I realize the price of dealing with a superpower can be high, but I never imagined that it would be as high as treating your country's citizens like livestock.

    This is terribly dehumanizing. Employees no longer just have an employee number, then have serial number like any animal on a feedlot, like any other cog in a machine -- and they don't just have it, they have it inside them. This is dystopian science fiction reified.

    The chip is reminiscent of the terrible and also un-removable serial number tattoos that Nazis forced on Jews and other concentration camp inmates.

    And I'm sure certain Christians will recall the "Number of the Beast" in the Christian Book of Revelation.

    Regardless of the recollections that spring to mind, this is a horrible defeat for humans and for humanity, and a great victory for the omnipresent, omnipotent "Big Brother" State.

    Shout out against this now -- shout to the roof tops -- or in ten years you'll have to decide between getting a chip of your own or losing your job -- and in twenty years, some bland man from Homeland Security will tell you that for "security reasons, you understand" you have no choice at all to refuse a chip.
  23. I want a MOD CHIP too!!! by erroneus · · Score: 2, Funny

    Then I can play all the cool games! Right now I can't play worth a flip.. ...this is about the new playstation right? Maybe I should go back and read the article...

  24. This is Old News by Prince+Vegeta+SSJ4 · · Score: 2, Funny

    THIS has been done before.

    We can rebuild him. We have the technology.

    We have the capability to make the world's first Bionic man.

    Rafael Macedo de la Concha will be that man.

    Better than he was before.

    Better . . . stronger . . . faster.

    duh nah nah nah nahhhh...

  25. Re:Next election by godglike · · Score: 2

    Well he is Mexico where they have changed party once in 70+ years, IIRC.

    When Ashcroft getting one? We REALLY want to know where he is all the time...

  26. This will stop.... by mseeger · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Hi,

    this will stop as soon as terrorist use RFID sensors to "trigger personalised" bombs.

    A few months ago i was consultant for a goverment agency. They were plannng to install RFID chips into the cars of VIPs to save them from stopping at the parkhouse entrance of that agency. The goal was to avoid stops and deny snipers a shot. We were able to convince them that this was "not a good idea" ®SMALL>TM.

    Regards, Martin

    1. Re:This will stop.... by blackest_k · · Score: 2, Interesting

      so thinking about this if an rfid is implanted in a tyre or other car part or maybe an item of clothing it would be possible to design a smart bomb that would only blow when a particular Rf tag (person) came into range.

      or how about an rftag smart minefield.
      say each us serviceman has an rf tag on his dog tag then a mine field could be laid which would be inhibited by the presence of the rf tag and totally lethal to the enemy whoever that might be.
      or conversely triggered. of course the mines could be rf tagged as well so you can collect them up later.

  27. Hmm... by chendo · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... Upgrades.

    *cue martial arts fighting scenes*

    --
    Founder of Mirror Moon - Tsukihime Game Trans
  28. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by vidarh · · Score: 2, Insightful
  29. "Non-removable" by alex_tibbles · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The article does not specify how it is made non-removable. Perhaps it reacts to air (but not blood etc!). Any ideas? Perhaps they just claim that to dissuade people chopping him up to get his security access...

  30. well, the plan is for.... by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... everyone to get the chip obviously. They know in advance it would be resisted, so to mitigate that, they have to first chip the ones who will be enforcing the mass chipping. That means the paramilitary the overt military and the police, and they have to start at the top in those orgs so that the orders will be followed. Every step of the mass chipping has to be taken precisely. They scare the parents into chipping the youngest. They force the highest levels in government to get the chip. The police and military get it, so that they can say "what citizen, you rdfuse the chip? WE got the chip, so if we can do it, you can do it", along those lines. We've seen the plans coming soon to chip cops hands so that that chip will activate their "smart" guns, so only the cop can use them. Special forces in the military are the first to be getting the chip. Criminals will be getting the chip soon, to track them inside the jail, then outside forever. As they enforce the chips in these unique areas, eventually enough of the population will have them so that the rest may be mandated to get them, perhaps to tie in with a universal ID system.

    One step at a time, how they do most things.

    This topcop down there being chipped might be related to corruption in mexico, no idea, seems reasonable enough though. It is obvious that we are seeing an outright complete merging of the countries, any sort of "border" now is becoming moot, so perhaps they will be trying out the more extreme measures down in mexico first, to work out the bugs, see what sort of techniques are more efficient.

  31. Re:Next election by huge · · Score: 2, Informative
    This guy seems to be assuming that he will never be our of office. An unremovable microchip giving access to a crime database seems a bit out of place for a private citizen.
    The article clearly states that it can be deactivated once he leaves the office.
    --
    -- Reality checks don't bounce.
  32. Just a PR stunt by James+Lewis · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I think this is obviously just a PR stunt by the Mexico officials to make it look like they are "doing something" about the crime in their country, when in fact this doesn't really help at all.

  33. Sounds like a bluff by color+of+static · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Think about it. You want to threaten the bad guys, who are a little less educated and a whole lot more guilable then you are. In that light you concoct a story that makes it sound like this database is being watched with "superhuman" effeciency by the head in each district. Throw in the part about tracking and non removable to make kidnapping seem dangerous, and you keep the officials safe on top of it.

    This sounds like it is the high tech version of the "This is protected by an alarm system." sticker. Instead of just buying them and sticking them on your windows, you do a press conference.

  34. Hostage protection? by TrentL · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually, this could be a good idea for people who are afraid they are going to be taken hostage. If I had to go to Iraq, I wouldn't mind having a chip in me so I could get rescued if I were taken hostage.

    1. Re:Hostage protection? by TopShelf · · Score: 3, Informative

      Exactly - and in much of Central and South America, kidnapping for ransom is a large and growing problem. I sometimes travel internationally on business, and there's no way I'd head down there these days. Fortunately for me, I usually head to Scandanavia. I'll let the Swedish Bikini Team take me hostage anytime...

      --
      Stop by my site where I write about ERP systems & more
    2. Re:Hostage protection? by carlos_benj · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If I had to go to Iraq, I wouldn't mind having a chip in me so I could get rescued if I were taken hostage.

      I thought there needed to be proximity before they could be detected and they didn't work well through barriers like walls.

      If that's the case, you should get two chips so they can find your head as well as your body once they're tossed out into the open....

      --

      --

      As a matter of fact, I am a lawyer. But I play an actor on TV.

    3. Re:Hostage protection? by SEWilco · · Score: 3, Informative

      The chip can only be detected at a distance of a few meters. It would help you in getting rescued only if the rescuers are waving a detector over everyone in the room.

    4. Re:Hostage protection? by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      Mexico is definitely in North America. You, know that trade deal you guys signed ~10 years ago, the one with the giant sucking sound? Canada-US-Mexico? NAFTA? North American Free Trade Agreement? ok, you got it now!

    5. Re:Hostage protection? by Kevin+Mitnick · · Score: 2, Informative

      alright, just don't try calling any Mexicans Central Americans, trust me.

  35. Scary. by bfg9000 · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the Article: Mexico's Attorney General Rafael Macedo de la Concha said he had a non-removable microchip implanted in his arm as a security measure to track him throughout Mexico and to give him access to a crime data bank.

    They say they'll have access to the network, but apparently, in Soviet Mexico, THE NETWORK WILL HAVE ACCESS TO *THEM*.

    Just say NO to the Mark of the Beast, kids. Especially if it's running Microsoft.

    --

    I'm not normally an irrational zealous dickhead, but I figure "When in Rome..."

  36. implantable batteries by zogger · · Score: 2, Interesting
    using that as a search term, you get 18,800 hits on google. And here is a New Scientist reference about rechargeable implantable batteries, that are recharged from inside the body using your body heat. This is a small copy/paste from that article: "The "biothermal battery" under development by Biophan Technologies of West Henrietta, will generate electricity using arrays of thousands of thermoelectric generators built into an implantable chip. These generators exploit the well-known thermocouple effect, in which a small voltage is generated when two of the junctions between two dissimilar materials are kept at different temperatures."

    Seems like the "limitations" of range and power to RFID tags that people kept saying would make them impractical for mass universal chipping are being overcome at a fast rate.

  37. Now THAT'S a Switch by Rob+Carr · · Score: 2, Interesting
    The article says that eventually around 160 Mexican officials will have a chip implanted."

    The usual FUD is that the politicians would get all the citizens implanted with chips, and that they would be able to spy on our every movement.

    Mexico has come up with the concept of implanting the politicians so that the citizens can spy on their every movement.

    This is a definite improvement, if you ask me.

    --
    This sig seemed like a good idea at the time....
  38. The Barcelona Method by replicant108 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    As somebody on another forum astutely observed, the way that this will be sold at first is by "chip = vip" method.

    Expect non-removable chips to become a chic accessory in the next few years.

  39. Right tool for the right problem! by Tackhead · · Score: 4, Funny
    > If you['re] gonna cut it out odds are you don't really cares what happens to him. I say use an ax. It'll be more fun that way.

    When the only tool you have is a hammer, every problem looks like a nail.

    When the only tool you have is a shotgun, every problem looks for the nearest exit.

    But when the only tool you have is an axe, every problem looks like hours of gleeful, giddy, glorious fun!

  40. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by aero6dof · · Score: 2, Insightful

    What? Mexico has a problem with "significant government corruption and organized crime" (including BTW judges and other officials being assasinated) and the solution is to put a location tracking device on the officials? Am I missing something here?

  41. Re:Tracking by GPLDAN · · Score: 3, Insightful

    hedless man:

    1. My take on it is that they mean "not trivially removeable", like a wristwatch. It's under the skin, I doubt it's grafted to the bone.

    2. His RFID code can be read to allow him access to the bank. It's a heck of a lot better than a driver's license as ID.

    3. Kidnapping is a HUGE problem in Mexico. huge. Hollywood put Denzel Washington in a movie, "Man on Fire" - about the kidnapping rings in Mexico. Vincente Fox has been asked to crack down on the issue. Mexican police are shot at about as often as U.S. forces in Baghdad, i.e. just about daily. You just don't read about it unless you read Spanish newspapers, like La Raza or others. At this point, RFID might be a minor deterrent to kidnapping. But it might just persuade potential enemies to just kill him outright in the street. In fact, they may put a hit on the guy JUST TO SEND A MESSAGE.

    I see a world like the one in Minority Report within my lifetime, and I'm 35. The Gap has a electronic voice that greets you as you walk in. Every subway car you board goes into a database. Every transaction your credit card makes goes through a heuristic filter for abnormal pattern matching, and certain kinds of deviations get you reported automatically to the government. RFID is just the means to make it happen.

  42. Re:Bush & Mexico by Abreu · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...And he supports NAFTA, which most people would agree benefits Mexico at least slightly more than the U.S.

    Absolutely not! NAFTA benefits the US far more than it benefits Mexico. The US has been blocking a lot of mexican products and services from entering the country because of protectionist lobbying.

    Just one example: USian truck drivers can enter Mexico without any trouble since day one of NAFTA, Mexican truck drivers are being blocked from entering the US because of lobbying from the teamsters union. Therefore, both US and Mexican producers trying to sell products to either side have to hire USian transports...

    Of course nobody has recourse on the WTO against the US, since the WTO is US-based and has never decided against the US in a trade dispute... Combined with the fact that mexican politicians would never do anything to upset Uncle Sam...

    --
    No sig for the moment.
  43. More like... by Xhad · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yo para una doy la bienvenida a nuestros overlords mejicanos del cyborg.

    (Apologies in advnance for my terrible Spanish)

  44. Or, he could just memorize a password by Fear+the+Clam · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...a non-removable microchip in his arm, to ... give him access to a new crime database...

    Somewhere in Mexico, an IT guy is laughing his ass off.

  45. Re:Mark of the beast and all that jazz... by bbobjoe · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Incorrect. The NT with exception of very early Bibles has been translated ONCE. I have a copy of the Critical Greek NT. That flags Manuscripts and their age. Most modern Bibles NIV, NASB, etc... Are heavily based on Codex Siniaticus (4th Century), Codex Vaticanus, and Codex A (5th Century) from Egypt. And various fragments from ealier. Translators do NOT keeping copying other works. The NIV was not a KJV copy. In fact the KJV is based on late Greek Manuscripts from the 11 - 15th Centuries. Although they agree about 99% statisically They NIV translators went back the said Manuscripts and translated. And it does mean right hand and forehead. Only 1-1.5% of the text of OT or NT is disputed and none of it affects any doctrine.

  46. Regarding Mark of the Beast by Landaras · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Everytime a topic like this comes up, a lot of people mention the Mark of the Beast or other references to Revelation.

    Many are jokes, a few feign seriousness, and there are sometimes one or two that appear to be truly righteously indigant (on Christian grounds) in regards to the technology.

    I personally don't touch eschatology, as I have better things to do with my time, but I thought I would repeat (or rather, paraphrase) the insight of a non-Christian poster of several months ago.


    Why do you fundamentalists get up in arms about this supposed 'Mark of the Beast' or that intepreted 'Sign of the End Times?'

    You say that you want Jesus to come back, but your messiah said himself that he won't return until these things come to pass.

    Stupid Christians. No End Times = No Return of Christ. You shouldn't be fighting this technology.

    You should be cheering this on.


    Not making any judgment calls (as a Christian myself), but thought I would repeat the insight for the benefit of all.

    - Neil Wehneman
    1. Re:Regarding Mark of the Beast by el_gregorio · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Basically, the fundamentalists oppose the "mark of the beast" because they believe those who allow themselves to be branded with it will go to Hell. the Bible claims this mark will be mandatory in order to participate in commerce. so, the fundamentalists believe there will come a time when you must accept the mark and a fate in hell, or reject it and be persecuted and unable to live in society.

      --
      "You want a toe? I can get you a toe by three o'clock... with nail polish."
  47. That was long due by varjag · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now, if they only equipped politicians with detonation collars..

    --
    Lisp is the Tengwar of programming languages.
  48. Re:But how many US officials have the chip?.. by Rich0 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Although I agree that implanting people with chips is pretty dehumanizing, if you agree to a particular job you have to agree with the particular terms of employment, no matter how absurd, if you don't like it then find a new line of work its that simple.

    I dunno. Suppose your kids are starving and the only job in town has an indentured servitude clause in their contract. Should that be legally permissible?

    You might suggest that the slave employer is at least taking care of his slaves instead of letting them die. However, I'd argue that it is immoral to allow somebody to die of starvation at your doorstep if you have the ability to render immediate aid to prevent this. Sure, I can't be the savior of the world, but if I see a man bleeding to death on the sidewalk of my house and don't even call an ambulence, what does that say of my character?

    Some employment conditions should be illegal simply becuase they are inhuman. Employers have a tremendous amount of power - particularly over those without highly in-demand talents or skills. You or I may be able to design computer software or something of high value. Some people are working hard just to be a Walmart greeter. Most normal people are somewhere in-between.

    Workplaces are something to be regualted for certain. That doesn't mean that we need expensive regulation that doesn't serve any benefit. However, to just say that an employer-employee relationship isn't anybody's business but their own is very naieve...

  49. Not Sure the Story is True by monk · · Score: 2, Interesting

    While he may have said these things in an interview for whatever reasons the claims sound a little odd to me. He claims that he, "...can also be located at any moment anywhere I am," with this system. If you think about that claim he's saying this chip somehow communicates with receivers which can track him. It can't be a passive RFID chip as their would have to be readers everywhere to power it, so we might assume it's an active chip. Where is the network of readers in place to track him all over Mexico? Maybe we can assume it uses cell towers. Does mexico have the cell location technology in place in the towers yet? Also, if you have a cell phone you have probably charged it at least every few days. With just an ID to transmit, let's assume his battery lasts longer, maybe weeks. Is he inserting a battery in his arm every few weeks? I don't think so. He might be charging the thing through a pair of coupled coils? Even so, wet tissues and skin don't make for a great environment for a transponder. That's why we don't implant tags in cattle among other reasons. The tags in small pets can only be read within a few inches.

    I think the current technology is just not up to this claim. Maybe the statement is an anti-kidnapping, psychological warfare tactic.

    --
    [-- Trust the Monkey --]
  50. Technically possible? I don't think so. by Gray · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I agree. It's almost certainly 99% BS. Maybe there is an RFID-type chip in his arm for accessing that database, that's fairly moot. There are lots of exciting way to protect databases and none of them are 100%.

    The tracing Mexico wide aspect is the tip off. Although everybody wants to think otherwise, I'm fairly sure that's just not technically possible.

    Passive RFID style chips are good up to 9 meters max. Even at 100 times that, it'd be next to useless for nation wide tracking.

    You can't stick a transponder of any decent power inside a person without a power supply.

    It's a bluff trying keep him unkidnapped and privacy advocate types off his back.

  51. People are overlooking the really important point by mcc · · Score: 2, Funny

    MEXICO WILL SOON BE RULED ENTIRELY BY CYBORGS. Is nobody noticing this? I mean, we can finally scratch an entry off the list of "things that we would have expected to happen in the 21st century". We may not have flying cars or meals in pill form yet, but at least Mexico is now living in the plot of a comic book.

    [Mexican mecha-attorney general] With this new microchip I have had implanted in me, I have become more powerful than ever imagined. I can track my movements, as well as access a new crime database.
    [Reporter] But Señor Macedo, aren't you worried about there being ill effects?
    [Mexican mecha-attourney general] Yes, that's why I have also had an "inhibitor chip" installed, so that I control the RFID chip-- instead of it controlling me.

  52. Re:Bush & Mexico by philbert26 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Of course nobody has recourse on the WTO against the US, since the WTO is US-based and has never decided against the US in a trade dispute...

    The WTO has never ruled against the US? Maybe they favour the USA over Mexico, but they sure don't give the USA a free pass in disputes with Europe.

    Combined with the fact that mexican politicians would never do anything to upset Uncle Sam...

    Are you sure?

    Has cynicism become the new naivety?

  53. Turn him into a video game by coinreturn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Tracking him with a website would be great fun (a-la the Sims). Also handy for any potential assassin.

  54. Re:Homeland Security masterplan by forgetmenot · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Don't fight it. Join it. Yup... when they start forcing RFID chips into my body, I'll add another 1,000,000 or so of my own all so the whitenoise will drown out the signal of the original.
    I should make sure that would work first though, shouldn't I.

  55. I can see it now! by sirgoran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    A sudden rash of Mexican officials having their arms cut off and the "secret" database being accessed and hacked. Nice business model folks!

    1. Implant security chip in arm, tell world about it
    2. Be found anywhere
    3. Access Secure database via chip
    4. Rebels cut off arm
    5. ???
    6. No Profit! Country in disrepair..
    Oh wait...

    -Goran

    --
    Carpe Scrotum - The only way to deal with your competition.