Slashdot Mirror


Dual Channel Memory Shootout

MDT48 writes "Ever wondered if that expensive low latency memory was worth the cash? These guys have rounded up almost every memory module out there and hammered them. Must have taken them ages, and takes almost as long to read, well worth the effort though."

17 of 204 comments (clear)

  1. TrustedReviews? by angst7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Never heard of them. But they sound reliable!

    --
    StrategyTalk.com, PC Game Forums
    1. Re:TrustedReviews? by PhrostyMcByte · · Score: 4, Funny

      Hey, if it's anything like Trusted Computing, it has to be good!

    2. Re:TrustedReviews? by Ari_Haviv · · Score: 2, Funny

      In other news...forthcoming Microsoft Windows Longhorn to be renamed Microsoft Windows Trusted Edition.

      --
      Join Team Mozilla #38050 Folding@home
  2. Now Nobody will RTFA by IcEMaN252 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Most people don't even read the short articles!

    --
    CitrusTV (http://www.citrustv.net): the Nation's Oldest & Largest Entirely Student-Run Television Station
    1. Re:Now Nobody will RTFA by eddy · · Score: 5, Funny

      There's articles?!

      --
      Belief is the currency of delusion.
  3. Memory review cache? by Bill_Royle · · Score: 4, Funny

    I suppose asking for a cached copy of this article would be a bit too ironic, right?

    1. Re:Memory review cache? by swordboy · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well, check out the article text once again:

      Ever wondered if that expensive low latency memory was worth the cash?

      Shouldn't that be cache ?

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  4. /.ed by Quixote · · Score: 4, Funny

    Their server could sure use some of that memory now...

  5. how convenient by rd4tech · · Score: 5, Funny

    they put everything into 33 darn pages so it can be mirrored easily...

  6. Re:Individual chip variation by Artega+VH · · Score: 2, Funny

    RTFA! They tested everyone piece of RAM in every possible configuration...

    DUH...

    --
    groklaw, wired and slashdot. The holy trinity of work based time wasting.
  7. Re:Results by randyest · · Score: 2, Funny
    --
    everything in moderation
  8. Re:Mushkin? by Dominatus · · Score: 3, Funny

    They prefer the term "Little People" now

  9. Re:Google saves by Frogbert · · Score: 4, Funny
    whoever moded the parent offtopic, have you at least clicked on the link?
    The site is /.ed, the parent is posting a GOOGLE cache link.
    How can it be offtopic?


    Did you even click the link?
    "ViewSonic VP2290b - High-Resolution TFT"

    The only way you could be more offtopic is if it contained gay cowboys eating pudding!
  10. Re:Ooh, shiny thing! by Orick · · Score: 2, Funny


    I'd tell you which stick was the best, but I don't remember. Must have picked the wrong one for my new brain mod....

    --
    Kirby Reviews

  11. Re:Mid Line Recommendation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Any memory brand who's name in Dutch and German means horney should be good.

  12. and now by Anubis350 · · Score: 3, Funny

    These guys have rounded up almost every memory module out there and hammered them

    and now they're being hammered....

    --
    "goodbye and hello, as always" ~Prince Corwin, from Zelazny's Amber series
  13. Re:I was going to mod you up.... by randyest · · Score: 1, Funny

    Keep the karma points; I don't need them. This just happens to be a subject I researched in detail recently and, instead of finding a great, in-depth, up-to-date review here on /. that would make me say "why didn't I read this before buying," I get this old article, with insanely misinformed posts that make me wonder why I bother with tech articles here.

    But you're kinda right. I brought home chocolate mousse cake from Appetito and ate it a little while ago. It rocked, but was heavily sugary. And my wife fell asleep before I noticed, so no nookie tonight. I'll be OK -- thanks for caring though :)

    --
    everything in moderation