Slashdot Mirror


GPS Coke Can X-Rayed

carbolic writes "WiFi-Toys.com and Engadget have posted a link to X-ray images of the GPS Coke can that has security people all up in arms. The GPS Coke can looks a little bit like an IED (improvised explosive device). The PDF file posted on security company Blackwater USA's site shows several views of the can and compares it to an IED. And for thoroughness, the PDF shows a regular can of Coke X-rayed, too."

46 of 291 comments (clear)

  1. dirty bomb by crazyray · · Score: 4, Informative

    it may be tinfoil-hat'ist, but couldnt a coke can be a miniture http://www.dirtybombdetector.com/ dirty coke bomb?

    1. Re:dirty bomb by mooniejohnson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Oh, you mean Diet Coke? There's a "dirty bomb" if ever I drank one...

      --

      Elmo knows where you live!

    2. Re:dirty bomb by Bi()hazard · · Score: 4, Funny

      Anyone who takes a look at the PDF will see there's little room for confusion between the can and the example explosives. The explosives, packed with explosive charge, contain material throughout the can, but the GPS Cokes are hollow. Actually I'm disappointed, you win the contest and you don't even get to drink a coke? sheesh.

      The controversy over GPS Cokes is just another example of our society's terror complex. It bears all the hallmarks of an unhealthy obsession that would lead an individual to a psychiatrist-not that I'd know about those-but these sorts of things tend to catch on at the societal level, as history shows us. Even though there has not been a major terrorist attack on US soil since 2001, a handful of cans of coke that could potentially look suspicious create a national spectacle. These things supposedly look like IUD's? What's the worst that could happen if an IUD ends up in the wrong place? Only minor bloodshed. Compare it to what happens in our automobiles every night. Look at the statistics sometime, and you'll realize psychology is the primary factor here-what matters is what you think about, not what actually is.

      Oh yes, that's right, the worst is as follows: The lucky contest winner has his can confiscated and destroyed as a potential IUD. He spends the night, and possibly several more nights until a court date, in a holding cell. The surrounding building is shut down, potentially paralyzing traffic in a major city in the middle of rush hour. (Yes that has happened, read down to see another poster's link about a suitcase getting lost and being "suspicous") This kind of thing has become routine, even expected in modern society. Nobody considers it an outrage when excessive measures are taken to combat an imaginary problem at great expense to society.

      We live in times when the world's most powerful nation is obsessed with the potential threat of an IUD. Are the IUD scare mongers the same ones that can't get over the horror of gay marriage and want to amend the constitution over it? They can't even accept the existence of birth control. The IUD and other "dire threats" like it have become a political tool used to manipulate the masses. You might hope that Kerry takes the election, simply so that we won't have the existing administration playing the terror card on every single issue as they have proven so fond of doing. An actual encounter with something containing an IUD might be shocking to most slashdotters, but think about why-you've never seen anything that could contain IUD. The odds are infinitesimal. Considering how little actual terrorism has been occurring in the US, clearly it's time to put things in perspective. A pragmatic foreign policy combined with old-fashioned enforcement of existing peacetime laws will be sufficient to keep order. Overreaction, fear, and excessive measures will paralyze the country, damage the economy, reduce consumer confidence, and most important of all, take a painful toll on individual Americans. This is the country of the individual, is it not?

      I'm not using an IUD. I never intend to, and I'm not going to live in fear of the consequences of IUD's. I for one refuse to live in fear of amenorrhea, irregular bleeding, cramping, partially expelled strings, and other side effects that can occur with progestin-releasing IUDs, which can be considered a frightening biological weapon. It's only frightening if you don't realize that you're a billion times more likely to die of a heart attack than an IUD.

    3. Re:dirty bomb by orthogonal · · Score: 5, Informative

      I'm not using an IUD. I never intend to, and I'm not going to live in fear of the consequences of IUD's. I for one refuse to live in fear of amenorrhea, irregular bleeding, cramping, partially expelled strings, and other side effects that can occur with progestin-releasing IUDs, which can be considered a frightening biological weapon. It's only frightening if you don't realize that you're a billion times more likely to die of a heart attack than an IUD.

      I'm not usually one to feed the trolls, but yours was brilliantly subtle.

      One question: did the article originally use the acronym "IUD" (intrauterine device), later corrected to "IED" (improvised explosive device) -- and thus your post was a satire on the Slashdot editors -- or did you just count on moderators not noticing the difference?

      Until I read your last paragraph, I wasn't even quite sure you hadn't made the mistake and had merely coincidently written descriptions that could apply either to IUDs or IEDs (the best of course, "An actual encounter with something containing an IUD [for those who modded the parent "Interesting": IUDs are "contained" in vaginas, or, more generally, sexually active women, so this is a slam at the stereotypical Slashdot geek] might be shocking to most slashdotters, but think about why-you've [sic] never seen anything that could contain IUD."

      Admittedly, you did throw in a pretty obvious clue "They can't even accept the existence of birth control. The IUD and other "dire threats" like it have become a political tool used to manipulate the masses"" but one that could be conceivably seen as a Lefty Slashdotter extending (legitimately, in my eyes) a critique of the Bush administration.

      Again, most trolls are a waste of time and earn their down mods, but this construction definitely deserves +5 Funny -- but not +4 Interesting (2 "Interesting"s, one Funny), which it was when I read it.

    4. Re:dirty bomb by bagel2ooo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The sad thing is that all these giving into fears and rampant paranoia sound exactly like things that terrorists and terrorist acts are meant to instill. Kind of a shame that such a large group of the populace ended up going right into the main plan of terrorism. In a manner, they are supporting it with near the amount (if not the vehemence) of those that contribute directly.

      --
      ( o ) one could say I'm rather baked
    5. Re:dirty bomb by jeaton · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually I'm disappointed, you win the contest and you don't even get to drink a coke? sheesh.


      A few years back, the local Dr. Pepper bottler had a contest where you could randomly win a Dr. Pepper t-shirt if you bought a can of Dr. Pepper from a vending machine. Some random cans in machines were replaced with identical-sized cans that contained a t-shirt, and 50 cents (presumably so that you could buy a real can of Dr Pepper).

      The part where they screwed up is that instead of including two quarters, they gave you a half dollar coin. The machines were unable to take a half dollar, so now you were left with a t-shirt and a 50-cent piece, and nothing to drink. Oops.
    6. Re:dirty bomb by Fooby · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [for those who modded the parent "Interesting": IUDs are "contained" in vaginas, or, more generally, sexually active women, so this is a slam at the stereotypical Slashdot geek]

      IUDs are placed inside the uterus, not the vagina, dumbass. That's why they're called "intrauterine devices." Sheesh, you're proving your own case about the sexual ignorance of slashdotters.

      Although I imagine placing an IUD in a woman's vagina would be very effective birth control, sex with a plastic contraction stuck in your vagina would be very discouraging for both parties involved.

  2. IED? by eidechse · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Is this actual demolition/weapons/forensic lingo or is this just supposed to sound 'informed'?

    1. Re:IED? by Alcohol+Fueled · · Score: 5, Informative

      Yep, its actual demolition lingo. IED stands for Improvised Explosive Device. :)

      --
      Ah am not a crook! (\(-__-)/)
    2. Re:IED? by Zorilla · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, being in the military, IED is just one of many acronyms that get thrown around. We always hear about UXOs, ECPs, MOPP levels, NBCCD, GVOs, JS-List suits, MXS, LRS, AMXS, 2PamCl, CMSAF, MCPON, AWACS, LMRs, LRMs, AFIs, MOS, AFSC, AOR, TRS, MTF, CJR, NCOIC, CGO, CWDE, BAH, BAS, CSC...

      You ever see that piece Andy Rooney did?

      (By the way, it stands for improvised explosive device)

      --

      It would be cool if it didn't suck.
    3. Re:IED? by volteface · · Score: 5, Informative

      Well, here's the wiki entry for it. It's a real term. I don't know who it's used by (demolitions experts, etc.), but it wasn't made up on the spot. Whether or not it was recently coined, I don't know, but it wasn't just made up for people to "sound important".

    4. Re:IED? by SlashdotLemming · · Score: 2, Informative

      the question was whether people who actually work in demolition/weapons/forensics use this acronym, or whether it's just been made up (recently, in the current war) for people to use to sound important

      It's nothing new. Common use in the military (pre 9/11)

  3. *Sigh* by Emperor+Tiberius · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Honestly. There are only a few hundred of these, and people are flipping out. Most of the things flying around are totally inaccurate. The cans come in a box, not your typical vending machine. So if companies are really security concious, they'll check employees with coke packs. Seriously though, how many people that work at those "high-level" (sic) facilities, bring 6/12 packs to work everyday.

    1. Re:*Sigh* by DerekLyons · · Score: 3, Informative
      The cans come in a box, not your typical vending machine. So if companies are really security concious, they'll check employees with coke packs. Seriously though, how many people that work at those "high-level" (sic) facilities, bring 6/12 packs to work everyday.
      Quite a few I'd imagine.

      When I was on SSBN 655, many folks would take a box or two of their favorite soda's to sea with them. (All we had for soda was fountain machines with generic (cola, lemon-lime, etc.) syrups. It's nice to have a taste of home when you are [mumble] feet under the North Alantic.) When I worked at TTF-Bangor, those of us in the Weapons Training Dept kept a refrigerator stocked with soda because that was cheaper than buying from the machine.
    2. Re:*Sigh* by LaForce · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The chance is there though and I for one wouldn't like to be in the position of having to explain it.

      I agree entirely. I know that I'd be very embarrassed if I had to explain how I didn't notice the can I packed was made of plastic and had a big hole on the side with a button in it.

    3. Re:*Sigh* by Cerebus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Seriously though, how many people that work at those "high-level" (sic) facilities, bring 6/12 packs to work everyday.


      A lot.

      Secure facilities are a pain in the butt to get in and out of, for obvious reasons. As a result, most facility personnel run snack bars inside the secured area. These snack bars buy supplies in bulk, usually from SAM's or Costco or similar big-box stores. Depending on size, these little co-ops can go through several hundred sodas per week.

      --
      -- Cerebus
    4. Re:*Sigh* by SEWilco · · Score: 2
      When I was on SSBN 655...

      "Sir, now that the mission is over can we surface and activate my winning can to see if they're able to deliver my car within 30 minutes?"

  4. So? by arakon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "It may look like a IED to a layman..."

    Um so? I imagine a lot of things could look like an explosive to a "Layman". Ever seen the inside of a CRT monitor or a TV? Imagine how much C4 you could hide in that.

    This is just plain silly.

    Are we moving to a society that fears anything that could potentially look like a bomb to an uneducated twit?

    --
    "If I were bound by all laws everywhere I'm sure I would have committed a capital crime somewhere."
  5. That helps a lot... by Cybershark302 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    now I know what to make my IED look like so it looks like one of those coke cans on an X-ray...that'll help a lot with getting past security...doesn't anyone else think that giving EVERYONE photos of this to make sure you don't confuse one with an explosive is a bad idea? now people that may be interested in building explosives have a design to shoot for...sure that's all tinfoil hat kinda fear, but aren't those the people X-raying cans in the first place?

    1. Re:That helps a lot... by mabinogi · · Score: 3, Insightful

      So how are you going to manage that?

      If you look at the X-Rays, the main difference between a real explosive device, and the GPS coke can, is that the GPS coke can just has electronics and batteries.
      An explosives device has electronics, batteries and.......explosives...

      Unless you're just gonna make an explosive device by overloading some capacitors I don't think there's much chance of anyone making the mistake.

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
    2. Re:That helps a lot... by kevinadi · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Nitro Glycerine is highly unstable. It does explode for no apparent reason other than it feels like it. Canning it is not practical or even possible.

      Although nitro does make a pretty good explosive. To make it stable, put some sawdust in it and you have a dynamite (IIRC).

      I'm not an expert, but I think there's no high power explosive material that isn't a solid. So far I've never heard of a liquid one.

      Damn there's so much words like "Explosives" in this post alone, the echelon network will be busy moderating everything here :)

  6. Sheesh. by The+Human+Cow · · Score: 5, Funny

    What are they worried about? Can't they just disarm the IED by tapping on the lid?

    --
    The Human Cow - bringing you scrumtrelescence since 1995
  7. Re:GPS coke can? by jgardn · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You posted a knee-jerk reaction.

    What causes starvation and poverty is not the lack of food. There is more than enough food. It is the lack of a free market to transport that food to market efficiently.

    In America, we have all kinds of systems to get the food to your dinner plate. These include the food processing and food transporting industries. Just as important is advertising and price setting. by advertising the availability of food, Americans are able to discover the rich variety of foods available.

    In Kosovo and other countries, starvation is caused by the lack of a free market. Right now, terrorists threaten any free trade. Just stepping outdoors is risking your life. In other places, farmers are not allowed to grow the foods they want to and sell them at whatever price they want. People are not allowed to traffic in food trade, and are not allowed to build up processing plants to process foods. It is either terrorism, civil war, or bad policy that causes this, but the end result is all the same.

    If you would really like to help the Kosovoans, send in some footsoldiers to weed out and eliminate the terrorists. Allow the people a chance to have a free election, encouraging things like civil discourse and not killing the opponent. Stabilize the security of the country first.

    Next, you must enact policies that will allow the free market to thrive.

    As you can see, whether or not the Coca-Cola company advertises a campaign for a contest has little bearing on the economy in Kosovo. Your comment was not only stupid, it was actually counterproductive.

    --
    The radical sect of Islam would either see you dead or "reverted" to Islam.
  8. Xrays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Anyone care to explain xray photos in full color? In all the images, the PCBs are green, the coke is brownish, etc... how the hell does an xray machine do color? or are they simply colored after the fact for clarity?

    1. Re:Xrays? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      xrays can be shown as either color OR the standard black and white, depending on the machine. Bomb Disposal teams use color xray machines for greater safety to the member disarming the device. (you can see the circuits, connections, wires, etc better in color)

      hope that helps!!

      from ******

  9. Re:GPS coke can? by dekeji · · Score: 3, Insightful

    It is the lack of a free market to transport that food to market efficiently.

    Yes, and do you know who is responsible for that? The US and Europe, with their lavish farm subsidies. If Western nations ever allowed the free market to operate in developing nations, problems with food and poverty in the world would be greatly reduced.

    In America, we have all kinds of systems to get the food to your dinner plate.

    We also have enormous government subsidies, paid for by tax payers, to keep farmers happy and in business. It may be good for ensuring a reliable food supply domestically (and give the number of wars we fight, not exactly a bad idea either), but it is causing huge economic problems elsewhere.

  10. Hey my car looks like a car bomb by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Lots and lots of cars look like the type somebody would make into a bomb including mine. (car bombs are always made out of white vans or white sedans). I think all non bomb devices that look like they _could_ be a bomb should have a sticker on them saying "This device in not a bomb". That way, the security people would have an easier job doing what they do. Whatever that is other than complain.

  11. why fly if you just won a car? by axonal · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The promotion with these coke cans is that you get a GMC equinox right? First off, if I had one of these cans, I don't think I'd take a flight and run it through the x-ray machine before I thought about pressing the button to claim my prize. I think as soon as I take this soda out of the package, and see, HEY! I WON MY PRIZE! I'll press the button. Thus, the Coca-Cola Prize Squad will come by, collect my can of technological glory and nicely deposit my newly won SUV. So why would I wanna take my can and run it through the x-ray machine?
    Those of you that may think that terrorists could run their "IEDs" through the x-ray machine to get past security. It wouldn't make sense, since the reason I just explained before. If it was REALLY a REAL GPS coke can, it wouldnt be there, since the person would have already claimed their prize as soon as they see it. Thus, it has to be a bomb otherwise.

  12. Re:GPS coke can? by DrSkwid · · Score: 2, Interesting

    In other places, farmers are not allowed to grow the foods they want to and sell them at whatever price they want.

    We call this place the European Free Trade Area. Farmers are paid to *not* grow food and food is destroyed to stablise prices. OTOH world's largest retail chain Wal-Mart, a non EU company, using it's buying power to dictate (i.e. lower) the wholesale price if it's food supplies. What a complete fuck up. Rich landowners are paid by the taxpayers to have their land lie fallow and those that grow get screwed on the price.

    There is a political malcontent being stirred up in the center-right press about the cost of East Europeans gaining access to the social security of the EU as though it will bleed our economy dry. Yet these payments are dwarfed by the payouts in farming subsidy ($6bn of which go to 5 people - yes individuals like the Duke of Westminster!) a subject on which they stay quiet (no surprise).

    ssshh don't you know there's a war on

    war on drugs, war on terror, whatever happened to peace ?

    sigh

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  13. Re:GPS coke can? by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

    "With so many people in the world today facing starvation and mass death from lack of nutrition, it literally sickens me to the stomach to see things like this."

    A.) Coke != America. It's a company.
    B.) Can't fight starvation without a strong economy.
    C.) It's one thing to say that corps making a lot of money should donate more, it's another to say they should stop marketing and put the money into other people's pockets. What happens when they grow dependent on it, then the lack of marketing suffocates the source of income?

    My post is off-topic, I accept that. It's worth the karma hit to tell you how short-sighted you're being. I don't want people to starve, either. We agree on that point. I agree that more sharing could happen. But, "What will Americans throw money away on next"? Grow up. I know for a fact you don't come from a country that's dedicating all its resources to the rest of the world. Give the USA a little credit, our economy is benefitting a LOT of people & countries through frivilous commercialism. Just ask anybody who thinks we're importing too much.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  14. PDF Mirror by EvilCabbage · · Score: 2

    Just in case that one breaks, here's another.

    It should take the abuse with good humour.

  15. Re:GPS coke can? by Blastrogath · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yeah, we realy should have checked with those other nations before deciding our domestic policies. Shame on us for wanting food if we ever go to war again.

    We should try to help other nations feed themselves, not complain that the "scraps" of our economy aren't being distributed evenly enough to feed them. Give a man a fish and you feed him for a day etc. etc.

    --
    "The price good men pay for indifference to public affairs is to be ruled by evil men." -Plato
  16. Okay I am confused. what is the point? by SmallFurryCreature · · Score: 3, Funny
    If security sees something they don't trust then they call the bomb experts. Simple. Better a false alarm then having a plane blow up.

    This seems to give the X-ray operators the idea that some cans can contain electronics. So all a terrorist now has to do is make his detonator be as neat as the coke can, thanks to the handy photo's and a x-ray operator will think "oh a suspicous thing oh no wait I seen that presentation this is one of them cans no need to check further".

    I wonder about the "normal" can x-ray. Why is it all orange? Can x-rays pass through aluminium but not coca cola? For gods sake what have I been drinking all this time that stops x-rays?

    So the perfect IED device is a can with a double wall, explosives inside, coke on the outside.

    --

    MMO Quests are like orgasms:

    You may solo them, I prefer them in a group.

    1. Re:Okay I am confused. what is the point? by pjt33 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Water blocks EM radiation fairly well - I believe it can only go through a quarter of a wavelength of water. Hence the US Navy's use of ELF for communicating with submarines.

    2. Re:Okay I am confused. what is the point? by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      If security sees something they don't trust then they call the bomb experts. Simple. Better a false alarm then having a plane blow up.

      This seems to give the X-ray operators the idea that some cans can contain electronics.

      Yep.

      So all a terrorist now has to do is make his detonator be as neat as the coke can, thanks to the handy photo's and a x-ray operator will think "oh a suspicous thing oh no wait I seen that presentation this is one of them cans no need to check further".

      Nope.

      The FIRST lesson for operators is that a can full of electronics MIGHT not be a bomb, and might not be known to the poor sap who had one in his carry-on lunch. So don't throw the lucky winner up against the wall and start punching him when he complains that he'll miss his plane.

      Second: This tells the operators how to tell the DIFFERENCE between a can-bomb and a can-phone, so they don't even need to open the box if it's the latter.

      Of course they won't just let the guy through with the phone. They'll haul him and his luggage aside and compare the image to their handouts of that PDF file. If they get a mismatch they'll still call the bomb squad. But if they get a match they'll tell him it looks like he got the lucky can, but we gotta open the bag to check it - and watch him call for his car.

      Watching the harried commuter decide between making his non-refundable-ticket air flight and getting the free SUV (and camera crew) delivered to the airport would make a GREAT break from a boring day of looking at X-rays of business suits and toothbrushes.

      --
      Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  17. Useful Information by _archangel · · Score: 5, Interesting

    To some extent, I can see the usefulness of this information. Back in summer of 2000, I was setting up DSL at my new apartment, and my ISP was going to ship the DSL modem to me.

    I came home from work one day to find two ambulances, two fire trucks, and a number of police vehicles throughout the fairly spread out apartment complex. Luckily, they were concentrated toward the front while my apartment was near the back of the complex. I was just able to enter my apartment without crossing the lines. On my way in, I asked an officer what was going on, and he said that there was a suspicious package that they were checking out.

    After about an hour, a policeman knocks on my door and asks me to come with him. When we arrived at the center of activity, I found out that the postman had delivered my DSL modem to the wrong address. Not only had he delivered it to the wrong address, but he placed the brown box label-side down on the doorstep of a police officer's apartment. The bomb squad did not know what it was after taking the X-rays, so they fired a water bullet into it. When nothing more happened, they decided it was safe and found my address on the package and got me. One of the bomb squad team told me that they were going to circulate the X-rays because they had never seen X-rays of these things before.

    When I got back to my apartment I plugged in the modem and everything worked perfectly. The modem had been double-boxed and bagged, and the outer box took the brunt of the damage.

    1. Re:Useful Information by crazyray · · Score: 2, Funny

      you may have thought they were over-reacting, but perhaps they assumed you were running Windows ME without patches. (plase mod this funny, its a joke)

    2. Re:Useful Information by _archangel · · Score: 2, Informative

      I have no idea what one actually looks like, but when I got the shipping box and modem, the shipping box was torn and wet, and the inside contents were wet. Thankfully, the inner box was no too damaged and the modem was wrapped in plastic. According to this web page http://www.emergency.com/CHBMBSQD.htm, "A disruptor can fire water or slugs at a package with pinpoint accuracy and is supposed to be able to break apart the circuitry of an explosive device." Thankfully, the modem was well packed and survived.

  18. Re:GPS coke can? by DeepHurtn! · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Just because America isn't feeding them doesn't make it Americas fault they can't feed themselves.

    It isn't quite so simple, though -- the western world (not just America -- I'm not an American either) does do harm to poorer countries through farm subsidies and other unfair trade practices. These make it basically impossible for many poor countries to develop a self-sufficient agricultural sector.

  19. Coke can telephones and radios... by mikael · · Score: 2, Insightful

    How is this any different from those novelty coke can telephones and coke can radios. Once the object is hidden inside a hand-luggage bag, what the outer surface looks like isn't going to make any difference to an X-ray machine.

    --
    Vintage computer adverts: http://www.vintageadbrowser.com/computers-and-software-ads
  20. IUD - ? Intra Uterine Device ? by Gopal.V · · Score: 2, Funny
    An IUD ??

    An actual encounter with something containing an IUD might be shocking to most slashdotters, but think about why you've never seen anything that could contain IUD. The odds are infinitesimal.

    Yeah, right :) ...

    The only thing an IUD is going to kill is a few million sperm ... but a single man produces enough to fertilize all women in Europe between 18 and 35 . But what if an IED kills HIM !!! *paranoia*

    PS: how a "single" man produces sperm is another question altogether....
  21. The real purpose of this.. by wfberg · · Score: 3, Funny

    is to enable those people who encounter such "suspect" cans of soda during their routine X-ray scanning for security purposes to identify them, in order to prevent a false alarm. X-ray operators should now have no need to call in the bomb squad, they can simply confiscate the suspect can themselves, for security reasons, and activate it, for security reasons, and keep the prize themselves.

    Strictly for security reasons, you see.

    --
    SCO employee? Check out the bounty
  22. EOD Perspective by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am an Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technition (military bomb squad) and I would just like to add that the Coca-Cola company was very helpful in the disemination of imformation to all security agencies. The device is not a threat, lack of information about this device is a threat.

  23. Re:Buttons by vericgar · · Score: 2, Funny

    It comes in those 12 or 24 packs of cans. You buy the entire pack and one of the cans in the box is the bomb, er winner...

  24. No, it's the UN that's responsible for that. by Ungrounded+Lightning · · Score: 2, Insightful

    It is the lack of a free market to transport that food to market efficiently.

    Yes, and do you know who is responsible for that? The US and Europe, with their lavish farm subsidies. If Western nations ever allowed the free market to operate in developing nations, problems with food and poverty in the world would be greatly reduced.


    No, what's responsible for that - in Kosovo at least - is the UN's arms embargo. By disarming everybody who wasn't supported by an outside group (typically a large country), they left them at the mercy of those who WERE supported by such powers, and who wanted to eliminate them. Thus starvation, and genocide.

    That's one special case. But there are plenty of other special cases.

    For instance: Iraq under Sadam. Turns out (as siezed documents show) many of the high UN officials - and high officials from various UN member countries - were on-the-take from the Oil-for-Palaces program - whose gravy train ended with the invasion. For over a decade the UN stood by while Sadam slaughtered Iraqui citizens - and many of the members opposed the invasion right up to the end (then made nicey-nice to join in on the reconstruction gravy-train once the bribes stopped flowing). Any bets on how much of that was due to bought politicians rather than principled opposition?

    Or take Biafra: Millions starved into death or plague, or masacred (with MACHETTIES - who needs guns?) because disarmament rendered them helpless before organized military opposition.

    Starvation doesn't come from "greedy corporations" "wasting money". They'd LOVE to feed the world - they'd make MORE MONEY that way!

    Starvation comes from government and proto-government intervention, through misguided policies or outright planned genocide.

    The solution to genocide is allow the potential victims - which means EVERYBODY - to arm themselves for their own defense. The solution to starvation is to eliminate the governmental obstacles to people feeding themselves, whether by raising their own food or earning enough after-confiscation cash to buy it from others.

    And the obstacle to both is governmental force, implemented either by malicious people or people too ignorant or stupid to understand that the SECOND-order effects of government programs often completely swamp and reverse the expected FIRST-order effects.

    --
    Bantam Dominique roosters crow a four-note song. Once you've heard it as "Happy BIRTHday" you can't NOT hear it that way
  25. Re:I have other concerns. by kd5ujz · · Score: 2

    I would not be surprised if AL-queda did not frequent slashdot, for "up to the minute cutting edge ideas".

    --
    -William
    God is everything science has yet to explain.