Slashdot Mirror
CA Dangles $1M Bounty for Ingres Conversion Tools
An anonymous reader writes "Computer Associates, on the heels of their announcement that they were moving to the service and support model, hence open sourcing Ingres, is set to announce a $1 million bounty for Ingres conversion tools [the idea being, obviously, to convert to Ingres, rather than away from it]. The bounty announcement coincides with the official announcement of the downloadability of the new, open-source Ingres. An earlier Information Week article rues the passing of Jasmine, which was a great idea, and, although perhaps a few years [maybe a decade?] ahead of its time, still the sort of thing that people like me could sure benefit from. Hint, hint..."
http://efil.blogspot.com/
Here are some others:
This is by no means a complete list. I wish I had more time for this post, but I don't think its worth the effort
Oh really? How is musing about the subtle change in tones of software companies towards open source a fanatical devotion to cause?
Sure, corporate adoption isn't what we'd like it to be. But neither do we expect things to change overnight. But the very fact that rather than standing firm against it, or suing it, they have started exploring it, smacks of a change in stance and outlook towards open source software. Pretty soon they will figure out way to make money with this change of stance. Which is what the ultimate success of open source software will be - availability of a larger pool of free software, yet the people developing it being paid.
http://efil.blogspot.com/
Assuming you're still in the mood for "bald zealotry" ...
Lambasting the proprietary front, Donofrio [senior vice president, technology and manufacturing, IBM] said, "The forces that cling to proprietary, closed ways of doing things are doing nothing to advance innovation. When you box people in, and create artificial barriers to solving problems, you can't expect creative, innovative solutions to spring forward."
Re-asserting IBM's love for Open Source systems, he explained, "Over the next decade, you'll see the open movement apply itself to all industries and disciplines. That's because it is leveling the playing field. It's telling everyone 'come and contribute to the effort.' The creation - and value - of intellectual property will be dramatically transformed. And that's not a threat, but a profound opportunity for business."
IBM Wont Use Patents Against Linux
Quoth the ever-helpful Wikipedia:
So Ingres is more than just backdoors running on 1524/tcp.Now you know. And knowing is half the battle.
-- null
Here's a full article at daemonnews about the history of postgresql.
It would be interesting if someone would benchmark these, noting the similarities and differences between the two now that ingres is open source. Also, maybe the pgsql development team could learn a thing or two by studying what CA did with ingres over the years. Maybe there is still some common code and design paradigms left between the two.
Computer Associates will buy your company, chew on it until its got all the flavor, then spit you out. My company started a data warehouse with Platinum software (great a metadata and data movement), then Platinum was bought by these guys, and CA halted development. We had to sue them to get our project money back.
CA has been buying companies for years, and not necessarily in a good way for consumers.
"At No. 4, we have Computer Associates. The current federal investigation into accounting irregularities notwithstanding, the company's longtime practice of acquiring aging technologies, slashing new development, and attempting to milk the installed base for service and support is a bigger issue. Users are trapped, CA knows it, and it does its best to take advantage of the situation."
Well guess what, what they didn't take into account was that when you're trying to sell enterprise products, it's quality, not quanity that counts. All those websites running Apache were for the most part ma and pa/joe nerd websites. Pretty much everyone running Netscape was a Fortune 500 company. Gee, guess who's gonna spend >$10K for an enterprise web solution, the 1000 guys who downloaded Apache to run their blogs and Natalie Portman tribute sites, or Bank of America?
If Apache can handle Amazon's traffic they can handle anything you or anyone else can throw at it. Don't blame Apache because your management was too cheap to purchase a decent enterprise solution. Apache is used in both ma and pop web sites as well as in the enterprise... Suggesting otherwise is pure fantasy.
You can do what you want, and write what you want, but you're not eligible for one of the prizes unless you're from one of the listed countries.
Ingres had a locking scheme that positively sucked. It had a scheme were rows existed in "pages" (re, oracle's DB_BLOCK_SIZE), and these "pages" then made up tables. If any session had write locks to more than 10 "pages" it would escalate the lock to the entire table. Caused all sorts of multiuser update issues.
Can't speak for the newer Ingres version though.
MySQL doesn't have real transaction processing mechanisms (and yes, I know about InnoDB, that that is not GPL'ed). MySQL is very fast reading data, and it's parser is pretty darn good.
Postgres does have transaction mechanisms very well implemented, though it is not as fast as MySQL for table reads.
Oracle is the gold standard, does pretty much everything a DBA might need, but gold isn't free, and neither is Oracle. You will probably need more than a platinum Visa card to get a commercial license. Maybe if you threw in your house?...
These are just my opinions.